arxiv: 2605.08683 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-09 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: 3 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

High-Precision Variational Quantum SVD via Classical Orthogonality Correction

Shohei Miyakoshi , Takanori Sugimoto , Tomonori Shirakawa , Seiji Yunoki , Hiroshi Ueda

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 01:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph

keywords variational quantum SVDentanglement spectrummatrix product statesdeflation algorithmquantum-classical hybridorthogonality correctionHeisenberg modelnear-term quantum devices

0 comments

The pith

Classical orthogonality correction lets shallow quantum circuits compute entanglement spectra accurately by filtering errors after extraction.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a hybrid quantum-classical method for partial singular value decomposition of bipartite quantum states, built on the canonical form of matrix product states. It uses a deflation-based variational optimization to extract dominant and subdominant Schmidt components sequentially. The central improvement is an explicit classical post-processing step that enforces orthogonality on the extracted vectors, acting as an error filter for hardware noise and limited circuit depth. This allows the use of shallow, suboptimal quantum circuits without sacrificing numerical accuracy, while also enabling a concurrent execution strategy that evaluates overlaps classically and cross terms with an auxiliary reference state. Benchmarks on ground states of one- and two-dimensional Heisenberg models confirm gains in accuracy and stability for entanglement spectrum estimation.

Core claim

By adding explicit classical orthogonality correction to the deflation algorithm, the framework turns hardware noise and finite-depth errors into filterable artifacts, so that numerical precision no longer depends on perfect quantum circuit optimization or deep ansatzes.

What carries the argument

The improved deflation algorithm with classical orthogonality correction, which restores mutual orthogonality of extracted Schmidt vectors after the quantum stage and decouples accuracy from circuit quality.

If this is right

Shallow ansatzes become viable for sequential extraction of multiple Schmidt components.
Barren plateaus and optimization hardness are mitigated because circuit quality no longer limits final accuracy.
Concurrent execution is possible: tensor-network contractions handle overlaps while an auxiliary reference state handles cross terms.
Controlled operations for target-state preparation are avoided, reducing overhead on near-term hardware.
The approach scales entanglement-spectrum estimation to larger systems than standard tomography allows.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same classical-correction idea could be tested on other variational quantum algorithms that require orthogonal subspaces but suffer from hardware noise.
If the correction remains effective on real devices, it may reduce the circuit-depth requirements for quantum simulation of topological phases.
One could check whether the method still works when the target state itself is prepared with modest noise rather than assumed ideal.
Extending the concurrent strategy to three or more parties might open routes to multipartite entanglement spectra without exponential measurement cost.

Load-bearing premise

The classical correction step can fully restore orthogonality and fidelity of the extracted vectors despite noise and shallow-circuit errors, without adding new systematic biases.

What would settle it

Apply the full pipeline to a small bipartite state whose exact Schmidt vectors are known, run the quantum part on a noisy simulator with deliberately shallow circuits, and check whether the classically corrected vectors match the exact ones to within the reported benchmark tolerance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.08683 by Hiroshi Ueda, Seiji Yunoki, Shohei Miyakoshi, Takanori Sugimoto, Tomonori Shirakawa.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1. Correspondence between the canonical form of the MPS and quantum circuit representation. (a) Canonical form of the MPS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Numerical results of the variational Schmidt decomposition algorithm for the 1D Heisenberg model ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Performance benchmarks of four variational SVD algorithms for the 1D Heisenberg model ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Performance benchmarks of partial SVD algorithms for the 2D Heisenberg model with system size [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison of hardware implementation strategies and the proposed hybrid architecture for improved deflation. Here, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Exact quantum circuit representation of an arbitrary quantum state for a system size [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Quantum circuit representation of the orthogonalized center [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) Quantum circuit for preparing a state proportional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9. Performance benchmarks of partial SVD algorithms for the 1D Heisenberg spin ladder with system size [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_9.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Evaluating the entanglement spectrum is essential for characterizing exotic quantum phases such as quantum criticality and topological order. However, for large quantum many-body systems, this task is hindered by the exponential measurement complexity of standard tomographic techniques. To address this challenge, we introduce a hybrid quantum-classical variational framework for partial singular value decomposition of bipartite states, built on the canonical form of matrix product states. We employ a deflation-based optimization approach to sequentially extract dominant and subdominant Schmidt components of target states. Because hardware noise and finite circuit depth can compromise the mutual orthogonality of these extracted vectors, we propose an improved deflation algorithm incorporating explicit classical orthogonality correction. This classical post-processing acts as an error-filtering mechanism, enabling shallow and suboptimal quantum circuits. As a result, numerical accuracy is decoupled from quantum circuit optimization, mitigating optimization difficulties caused by barren plateaus and hardware noise. Furthermore, shallow ansatzes enable a concurrent execution strategy. Overlap matrices are evaluated by classical tensor network contractions, while cross terms between the target state and the extracted vectors are computed using an auxiliary reference state. This concurrent hybrid design improves computational throughput and bypasses the overhead of controlled target-state preparation. Numerical benchmarks on the ground states of one- and two-dimensional Heisenberg models demonstrate improved accuracy and numerical stability. By mitigating hurdles of circuit depth, optimization hardness, and measurement complexity, our framework provides a robust pathway for large-scale entanglement spectrum estimation on advanced near-term quantum devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives a practical hybrid variational SVD method for entanglement spectra that uses classical orthogonality correction to tolerate shallow noisy circuits, but the numerical support for no bias in sequential deflation is still thin.

read the letter

The core contribution is a deflation-based variational quantum SVD on matrix product states, augmented by classical post-processing to restore orthogonality of the extracted Schmidt vectors and a concurrent hybrid execution that computes overlaps classically via tensor networks while using an auxiliary reference state for cross terms. This setup aims to cut circuit depth and avoid controlled operations on the target state. The abstract positions the classical correction as an error filter that decouples accuracy from quantum optimization, which could ease barren plateaus and hardware noise for entanglement spectrum work on near-term devices. Benchmarks on one- and two-dimensional Heisenberg ground states are cited as showing better accuracy and stability than prior approaches. That combination of deflation, explicit classical fix, and auxiliary-state concurrency is not a standard extension of existing variational or tomographic methods. The approach is concrete and targets a real bottleneck in large-system entanglement estimation. The soft spot is the lack of detail on whether the post-hoc correction shifts singular-value estimates during sequential deflation. If corrected vectors are used for projection in later steps, the effective operator changes, and it is not obvious from the abstract whether this introduces systematic bias or if the reported gains come mainly from the classical step rather than the quantum variational part. Direct before-and-after comparisons under realistic noise would clarify this. Readers focused on hybrid algorithms for many-body quantum phases or near-term entanglement measures would get value from the implementation ideas. The work shows clear engagement with practical constraints and deserves a serious referee to examine the numerical validation and deflation mechanics.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a hybrid quantum-classical variational framework for partial singular value decomposition (SVD) of bipartite quantum states, based on the canonical form of matrix product states (MPS). It uses a deflation-based optimization to sequentially extract dominant Schmidt components, augmented by an explicit classical orthogonality correction applied to the extracted vectors. Overlaps are computed via classical tensor-network contractions and cross terms via an auxiliary reference state. The central claim is that this post-processing acts as an error filter, enabling shallow quantum circuits, decoupling numerical accuracy from circuit optimization, and mitigating barren plateaus and hardware noise, as demonstrated by improved accuracy on ground states of 1D and 2D Heisenberg models.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work provides a practical route to entanglement spectrum estimation on near-term quantum hardware by allowing suboptimal shallow ansatzes while preserving fidelity through classical correction. The hybrid design, with classical MPS contractions for overlaps and concurrent execution, is a clear strength that improves throughput and avoids controlled-state overhead. This builds on established MPS techniques but adds a targeted error-mitigation step that could extend the reach of variational quantum algorithms for many-body physics if the absence of systematic bias in deflation is confirmed.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the classical orthogonality correction 'acts as an error-filtering mechanism' and 'decouples numerical accuracy from quantum circuit optimization' is load-bearing, yet the description does not specify whether the correction is inserted inside the deflation optimization loop (affecting the cost function and subtracted projections) or applied only after optimization; sequential deflation makes this distinction critical for whether singular-value estimates remain unbiased.
[Numerical benchmarks] Numerical benchmarks on Heisenberg ground states: the reported 'improved accuracy and numerical stability' lacks quantitative error bars on singular values, direct before-versus-after correction comparisons under noise models, or baselines against uncorrected variational deflation or classical SVD, leaving open the possibility that gains derive primarily from the classical step rather than the quantum variational procedure.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'partial singular value decomposition' would benefit from an explicit statement of how many Schmidt components are targeted and whether the method extends to full spectrum extraction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback. We address each major comment point by point below and have made revisions to improve clarity and strengthen the presentation of results.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the classical orthogonality correction 'acts as an error-filtering mechanism' and 'decouples numerical accuracy from quantum circuit optimization' is load-bearing, yet the description does not specify whether the correction is inserted inside the deflation optimization loop (affecting the cost function and subtracted projections) or applied only after optimization; sequential deflation makes this distinction critical for whether singular-value estimates remain unbiased.

Authors: We appreciate this observation on the critical distinction for unbiased estimates. In the algorithm, after each variational optimization of a Schmidt component, the classical orthogonality correction is applied to the extracted vector before it is used for projection subtraction in the subsequent deflation step. This sequential post-optimization correction is integrated into the loop and affects the cost function for the next component. We have revised the abstract and Section III to explicitly describe this placement and confirm that singular-value estimates remain unbiased. revision: yes
Referee: [Numerical benchmarks] Numerical benchmarks on Heisenberg ground states: the reported 'improved accuracy and numerical stability' lacks quantitative error bars on singular values, direct before-versus-after correction comparisons under noise models, or baselines against uncorrected variational deflation or classical SVD, leaving open the possibility that gains derive primarily from the classical step rather than the quantum variational procedure.

Authors: We agree that more quantitative detail is needed to substantiate the claims. In the revised manuscript we add error bars on singular values from multiple independent runs, direct before-and-after comparisons of the correction under depolarizing noise, and baselines against both uncorrected variational deflation and exact classical SVD. These additions show that the hybrid procedure enables shallower circuits with stable optimization that pure classical methods cannot replicate, while the correction provides the error filtering. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on standard MPS and TN methods

full rationale

The paper's chain uses established canonical MPS forms for bipartite states and classical tensor-network contractions to evaluate overlaps, with the orthogonality correction applied as post-processing after quantum variational outputs. This does not reduce singular-value estimates or fidelity claims to fitted parameters by construction, nor does it invoke self-citations for uniqueness theorems or smuggle ansatzes. Deflation is sequential but the correction is described as an error filter without making the optimization landscape equivalent to its inputs. Numerical benchmarks on Heisenberg models serve as independent validation outside the fitted values. No load-bearing step reduces to self-definition or renaming of known results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard quantum-information assumptions about bipartite state representations and variational optimization; no new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)

variational circuit parameters
Optimized during the hybrid variational procedure to approximate Schmidt vectors.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Bipartite quantum states admit a canonical matrix-product-state representation
Invoked as the structural foundation for the partial SVD framework.
domain assumption Classical tensor-network contractions can accurately compute overlap matrices between extracted vectors
Used to enable the concurrent execution strategy.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5570 in / 1388 out tokens · 37293 ms · 2026-05-12T01:24:23.627129+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel (J-cost uniqueness) unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

we propose an improved deflation algorithm incorporating an explicit classical orthogonality correction... using the corrected projector P_n = P^A_n ⊗ P^B_n ... pseudo-inverses of the overlap matrices A_n = (⟨u_k|u_l⟩) and B_n
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

numerical benchmarks on the ground states of one- and two-dimensional Heisenberg models demonstrate improved accuracy and numerical stability
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking (D=3 forcing) unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

overlap matrices are evaluated by classical tensor network contractions, while cross terms... using an auxiliary reference state

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Toestablishthisprop- erty, we first show that an arbitrary quantum state|Ψ⟩ can be directly transformed into an MPS through Singular Value Decomposition (SVD)

ExactQuantumCircuitRepresentation In this section, we demonstrate that a Matrix Product State (MPS) in the canonical form can be exactly mapped toaquantumcircuitrepresentation. Toestablishthisprop- erty, we first show that an arbitrary quantum state|Ψ⟩ can be directly transformed into an MPS through Singular Value Decomposition (SVD). Furthermore, we clar...

work page
[2]

QuantumCircuitRepresentationforthe OrthogonalizedCenter Intheprevioussection,wediscussedtheconstructionof the quantum circuit for an arbitrary quantum state using SVD, but did not detail the specific quantum circuit repre- sentationforeachunitarygate. Inthissection,wefocuson theunitarygatescorrespondingtotheorthogonalizedcen- ter and construct their detai...

work page
[3]

Since the Schmidt decomposition is math- ematicallyequivalenttoSVD,itisinstructivetodiscussthe application of our quantum algorithm to SVD for general matrixoperators

ApplicationtoSVDforGeneralMatrixOperators In our study, we have focused on the variational quan- tumalgorithmfortheSchmidtdecompositionofabipartite quantum state. Since the Schmidt decomposition is math- ematicallyequivalenttoSVD,itisinstructivetodiscussthe application of our quantum algorithm to SVD for general matrixoperators. Inthissection,todemonstrat...

work page
[4]

The details of majorization, including the proofs of the theorems, can befoundinthemonographbyMarshall,Olkin,andArnold [36]

Majorization Inthissection,weintroducetheconceptofmajorization and explain the Hardy-Littlewood-Pólya theorem, and dis- cuss its application in the subsequent section. The details of majorization, including the proofs of the theorems, can befoundinthemonographbyMarshall,Olkin,andArnold [36]. Definition 1(Majorization).Given a vector𝒙= (𝑥1,⋯,𝑥𝑁) ∈ℝ 𝑁, we d...

work page
[5]

UpperBoundoftheObjectiveFunctionforFull Optimization Inthissection,utilizingtheconceptofmajorizationdis- cussed in the previous section, we discuss the properties of the full optimization algorithm by evaluating the upper bound of the objective function, which corresponds to the overlap between the reference state and the quantum cir- cuitstate. First, we...

work page
[6]

We specifically choose𝑝= 1, as this choice is critical for ensuring numerical robustness and minimizing error amplification

ErrorPropagationAnalysisforthePartial OptimizationAlgorithm In our partial optimization algorithm, we iteratively re- cover the singular values{𝜎𝑛}from the cumulative sum of their𝑝-th powers. We specifically choose𝑝= 1, as this choice is critical for ensuring numerical robustness and minimizing error amplification. In this subsection, we an- alyzetheerror...

work page
[7]

1DHeisenbergSpinLadder While the main text focuses on representative gapless systems, such as the 1D chain and 2D square lattice, this section benchmarks our variational SVD algorithms on a prototypical gapped system: the 1D Heisenberg spin lad- dershowninFig.9(a). TheHamiltonianofthetwo-legspin ladderisgivenby ̂𝐻=𝐽∥ ∑ 𝑙=1,2 𝐿∑ 𝑛=1 ̂𝑺𝑙,𝑛⋅̂𝑺𝑙,𝑛+1+𝐽⟂ 𝐿∑ 𝑛=1...

work page
[8]

Einstein, B

A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Can quantum- mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?,PhysicalReview47,777(1935)

work page 1935
[9]

J. S. Bell, On the einstein podolsky rosen paradox, Physics PhysiqueFizika1,195(1964)

work page 1964
[10]

Bell nonlocality

N. Brunner, D. Cavalcanti, S. Pironio, V. Scarani, and S. Wehner, Bell nonlocality, Reviews of Modern Physics86, 419(2014),arXiv:1303.2849

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[11]

M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum computation and quantum information: 10th anniversary edition(Cambridge UniversityPress,Cambridge,2010)

work page 2010
[12]

L.Amico,R.Fazio,A.Osterloh,andV.Vedral,Entanglement in many-body systems, Reviews of Modern Physics80, 517 (2008),arXiv:quant-ph/0703044

work page arXiv 2008
[13]

C.Holzhey,F.Larsen,andF.Wilczek,Geometricandrenor- malized entropy in conformal field theory, Nuclear Physics B424,443(1994),arXiv:hep-th/9403108

work page arXiv 1994
[14]

Calabrese and J.L

P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and quan- tum field theory, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory andExperiment2004,P06002(2004),arXiv:hep-th/0405152

work page arXiv 2004
[15]

Tagliacozzo, Thiago

L. Tagliacozzo, Thiago. R. de Oliveira, S. Iblisdir, and J. I. Latorre,Scalingofentanglementsupportformatrixproduct states,PhysicalReviewB78,024410(2008),arXiv:0712.1976

work page arXiv 2008
[16]

F.Pollmann,S.Mukerjee,A.Turner,andJ.E.Moore,Theory 24 offinite-entanglementscalingatone-dimensionalquantum critical points, Physical Review Letters102, 255701 (2009), arXiv:0812.2903

work page arXiv 2009
[17]

Kitaev and J

A. Kitaev and J. Preskill, Topological entanglement entropy, PhysicalReviewLetters96,110404(2006)

work page 2006
[18]

Li and F

H. Li and F. D. M. Haldane, Entanglement spectrum as a generalization of entanglement entropy: Identification of topological order in non-abelian fractional quantum hall effect states, Physical Review Letters101, 010504 (2008), arXiv:0805.0332

work page arXiv 2008
[19]

Pollmann, A

F. Pollmann, A. M. Turner, E. Berg, and M. Oshikawa, En- tanglement spectrum of a topological phase in one dimen- sion, Physical Review B81, 064439 (2010), arXiv:0910.1811; F.Pollmann, E.Berg, A.M.Turner, andM. Oshikawa,Sym- metry protection of topological phases in one-dimensional quantumspinsystems,PhysicalReviewB85,075125(2012), arXiv:0909.4059

work page arXiv 2010
[20]

Miyakoshi, S

S. Miyakoshi, S. Nishimoto, and Y. Ohta, Entangle- ment properties of the haldane phases: A finite system- size approach, Physical Review B94, 235155 (2016), arXiv:1612.04686

work page arXiv 2016
[21]

Calabrese and J

P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Evolution of entanglement en- tropy in one-dimensional systems, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2005, P04010 (2005), arXiv:cond-mat/0503393

work page arXiv 2005
[22]

Hosur, X.-L

P. Hosur, X.-L. Qi, D. A. Roberts, and B. Yoshida, Chaos in quantum channels, Journal of High Energy Physics2016, 4 (2016),arXiv:1511.04021

work page arXiv 2016
[23]

Probing entanglement entropy via randomized measurements

T.Brydges,A.Elben,P.Jurcevic,B.Vermersch,C.Maier,B.P. Lanyon, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Probing rényi en- tanglemententropyviarandomizedmeasurements,Science 364,260(2019),arXiv:1806.05747

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[24]

K. J. Satzinger, Y. Liu, A. Smith, C. Knapp, M. Newman, C.Jones,Z.Chen,C.Quintana,X.Mi,A.Dunsworth,C.Gid- ney, I. Aleiner, F. Arute, K. Arya, J. Atalaya, R. Babbush, J. C. Bardin, R. Barends, J. Basso, A. Bengtsson, A. Bilmes, M.Broughton,B.B.Buckley,D.A.Buell,B.Burkett,N.Bush- nell, B. Chiaro, R. Collins, W. Courtney, S. Demura, A. R. Derk, D. Eppens, C....

work page arXiv 2021
[25]

Islam, R

R. Islam, R. Ma, P. M. Preiss, M. Eric Tai, A. Lukin, M. Rispoli, and M. Greiner, Measuring entanglement en- tropy in a quantum many-body system, Nature528, 77 (2015),arXiv:1509.01160

work page arXiv 2015
[26]

D. A. Abanin and E. Demler, Measuring entanglement en- tropyofagenericmany-bodysystemwithaquantumswitch, PhysicalReviewLetters109,020504(2012),arXiv:1204.2819

work page arXiv 2012
[27]

Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond,

J. Preskill, Quantum computing in the nisq era and beyond, Quantum2,79(2018),arXiv:1801.00862

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[28]

A. K. Ekert, C. M. Alves, D. K. L. Oi, M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and L. C. Kwek, Direct estimations of linear and nonlinear functionals of a quantum state, Physical Re- viewLetters88,217901(2002),arXiv:quant-ph/0203016

work page arXiv 2002
[29]

Johri, D

S. Johri, D. S. Steiger, and M. Troyer, Entanglement spec- troscopy on a quantum computer, Physical Review B96, 195136(2017),arXiv:1707.07658

work page arXiv 2017
[30]

Subaşı, L

Y. Subaşı, L. Cincio, and P. J. Coles, Entanglement spec- troscopy with a depth-two quantum circuit, Journal of PhysicsA:MathematicalandTheoretical52,044001(2019), arXiv:1806.08863

work page arXiv 2019
[31]

Rebentrost, A

P. Rebentrost, A. Steffens, I. Marvian, and S. Lloyd, Quan- tum singular-value decomposition of nonsparse low-rank matrices, Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular, and Opti- calPhysics97,012327(2018),arXiv:1607.05404

work page arXiv 2018
[32]

Huang, R

H.-Y. Huang, R. Kueng, and J. Preskill, Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measure- ments,NaturePhysics16,1050(2020),arXiv:2002.08953

work page arXiv 2020
[33]

Elben, S

A. Elben, S. T. Flammia, H.-Y. Huang, R. Kueng, J. Preskill, B. Vermersch, and P. Zoller, The randomized mea- surement toolbox, Nature Reviews Physics5, 9 (2023), arXiv:2203.11374

work page arXiv 2023
[34]

U.Schollwöck,Thedensity-matrixrenormalizationgroupin the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics326, 96 (2011),arXiv:1008.3477

work page Pith review arXiv 2011
[35]

Bravo-Prieto, D

C. Bravo-Prieto, D. García-Martín, and J. I. Latorre, Quantum singular value decomposer, Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics101, 062310 (2020), arXiv:1905.01353

work page arXiv 2020
[36]

X. Wang, Z. Song, and Y. Wang, Variational quantum singular value decomposition, Quantum5, 483 (2021), arXiv:2006.02336

work page arXiv 2021
[37]

Kokail, R

C. Kokail, R. van Bijnen, A. Elben, B. Vermersch, and P. Zoller, Entanglement hamiltonian tomography in quantum simulation, Nature Physics17, 936 (2021), arXiv:2009.09000

work page arXiv 2021
[38]

LaRose, A

R. LaRose, A. Tikku, É. O’Neel-Judy, L. Cincio, and P. J. Coles,Variationalquantumstatediagonalization,npjQuan- tumInformation5,57(2019),arXiv:1810.10506

work page arXiv 2019
[39]

Shirakawa, H

T. Shirakawa, H. Ueda, and S. Yunoki, Automatic quantum circuitencodingofagivenarbitraryquantumstate,PhysRe- viewResearch6,043008(2024),arXiv:2112.14524

work page arXiv 2024
[40]

Miyakoshi, T

S. Miyakoshi, T. Sugimoto, T. Shirakawa, S. Yunoki, and H. Ueda, Diamond-shaped quantum circuit for real-time quantumdynamicsinonedimension,PhysReviewResearch 6,043318(2024),arXiv:2311.05900

work page arXiv 2024
[41]

Higgott, D

O. Higgott, D. Wang, and S. Brierley, Variational quan- tum computation of excited states, Quantum3, 156 (2019), arXiv:1805.08138

work page arXiv 2019
[42]

K. M. Nakanishi, K. Mitarai, and K. Fujii, Subspace-search variational quantum eigensolver for excited states, Phys Re- viewResearch1,033062(2019),arXiv:1810.09434

work page arXiv 2019
[43]

A.W.Marshall,I.Olkin,andB.C.Arnold,Inequalities: The- oryofmajorizationanditsapplications,2nded.,Springerse- riesinstatistics(Springer,NewYork,NY,2011)

work page 2011