pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.08918 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-09 · 🪐 quant-ph

Quantum Transport in Disordered Spin Networks: Emergent Timescales and Competing Pathways

Roi Nevo , Brett Min , Maggie Lawrence , Dvira Segal , Nir Bar-Gill This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 03:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum transportdisordered spin networksrelaxation timescaleseffective detuningdipolar interactionslocal dephasingspin bathstight-binding model
0
0 comments X

The pith

Strong internal hybridization in spin clusters generates effective detuning that parametrically slows global relaxation in disordered networks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies quantum transport of a spin impurity through small spatially disordered networks of spins using a two-dimensional tight-binding model with dipolar interactions and local dephasing. Geometric disorder creates hierarchical couplings, with tight clusters connected only weakly to the rest of the network, which separates the dynamics into fast local equilibration and much slower global relaxation. A minimal three-site model traces the longest timescale to strong hybridization inside the cluster, which produces an effective detuning that blocks transfer across the weak links, especially when dephasing is weak. Simulations of random configurations and nonequilibrium steady-state calculations confirm that such hierarchies can extend relaxation times by orders of magnitude. The results matter for energy and information flow in nanoscale spin systems and small open quantum baths.

Core claim

Using a two-dimensional tight-binding model with dipolar interactions and local dephasing, geometric heterogeneity in small spin networks produces hierarchical coupling strengths and separation of dynamical timescales. A minimal three-site model shows that strong internal hybridization generates an effective detuning suppressing transfer to weakly coupled sites, yielding a parametrically enhanced relaxation time in the weak-dephasing regime. Nonequilibrium steady-state transport calculations and simulations of disordered configurations corroborate this picture, demonstrating orders-of-magnitude slowing of relaxation when hierarchical couplings are present.

What carries the argument

Effective detuning from strong internal hybridization in a three-site cluster, which suppresses weak inter-cluster transfer and produces parametrically longer relaxation.

If this is right

  • Cluster-level equilibration occurs faster than global network equilibration.
  • Relaxation time becomes parametrically enhanced specifically in the weak-dephasing regime.
  • Nonequilibrium steady-state currents slow by orders of magnitude when hierarchical couplings are present.
  • Geometry and connectivity control the emergence of multiple transport timescales in open spin systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same detuning mechanism could appear in larger or three-dimensional disordered spin networks and affect transport in solid-state spin baths.
  • Controlled experiments with small spin ensembles, such as those realized in diamond defects, could directly test the predicted orders-of-magnitude differences in relaxation.
  • Network design for quantum information transfer might use geometry to tune cluster hybridization and thereby control relaxation rates.

Load-bearing premise

A small finite two-dimensional network with only dipolar interactions and purely local dephasing captures the essential physics of real disordered spin systems without needing longer-range couplings or non-Markovian bath dynamics.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of relaxation times in a controlled three-spin system with strong internal hybridization versus uniform weak couplings, under weak dephasing, showing whether the hybridized case exhibits parametrically longer relaxation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.08918 by Brett Min, Dvira Segal, Maggie Lawrence, Nir Bar-Gill, Roi Nevo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: summarizes the integrated transfer diagnostics for Configuration B. We focus on initialization at the site 5 and follow the transfer measure T5i . We also study the inverse survival measure at each site, T −1 ii . These met￾rics are presented as functions of the dephasing strength Γ. To connect these measures to the time domain dy￾namics, in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Another site (colored in red) serves as the ex￾citation site. So far, this corresponds to our standard setup. To enable a controlled investigation of hierarchi￾cal relaxation dynamics, we introduce an additional spin, referred to as the gateway site. It is placed in the vicinity of the excitation site, with a tunable coupling J between them. We vary J by adjusting the distance between the excitation and g… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: (c), for large J this time grows linearly with J. Beyond scaling relations, we find that the parameter choices ϵbath ≈ 2 × 10−4 and ϵlink ≈ 8 × 10−3 provide a consistent description of the data. These values are in reasonable agreement with the case study presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: (c), where no systematic dependence of Γ∗ (the dephasing strength at which Tii is minimized) on N is observed. This size-independence indicates that the optimal de- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: FIG. 21 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: FIG. 23 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: FIG. 25 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_25.png] view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: FIG. 26 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_26.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantum transport in disordered systems poses intriguing fundamental questions about the interplay of disorder, interactions, and decoherence, with important implications for nanoscale energy transfer and quantum information transfer. Here, we investigate the emergence of multiple transport timescales in the dissipative dynamics of a spin impurity coupled to a small, spatially disordered network of spins. Using a two-dimensional tight-binding model with dipolar interactions and local dephasing, we demonstrate that geometric heterogeneity leads to hierarchical coupling strengths and pronounced separation of dynamical timescales. By analyzing different metrics for dynamics, we identify distinct relaxation timescales associated with cluster-level equilibration and global equilibration. A minimal three-site model reveals the physical origin of the longest timescale: strong internal hybridization generates an effective detuning that suppresses transfer to other weakly coupled sites, yielding a parametrically enhanced relaxation time in the weak-dephasing regime. We corroborate this picture with nonequilibrium steady-state transport calculations and simulations of disordered spin configurations, demonstrating orders-of-magnitude slowing of relaxation when hierarchical couplings are present. Our results highlight the central role of geometry and connectivity in spin networks and open quantum systems in general, and provide experimentally relevant predictions for relaxation times in small spin baths.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates quantum transport in small disordered spin networks via a 2D tight-binding model with dipolar interactions and local dephasing. It shows that geometric heterogeneity produces hierarchical couplings and separated dynamical timescales, with cluster equilibration distinct from global equilibration. A minimal three-site model is used to derive that strong internal hybridization creates an effective detuning suppressing transfer to weakly coupled sites, yielding parametrically enhanced relaxation times in the weak-dephasing regime. This picture is supported by nonequilibrium steady-state calculations and ensemble simulations of disordered configurations, which exhibit orders-of-magnitude slowing when hierarchical couplings are present.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the work provides a transparent physical mechanism linking geometry, disorder, and decoherence to emergent slow timescales in open quantum systems. This is relevant for nanoscale energy transfer and spin-bath dynamics in quantum information contexts, and the parametric enhancement offers falsifiable predictions for relaxation rates in small networks.

major comments (2)
  1. [minimal three-site model] Three-site model derivation (the minimal model section): the adiabatic elimination yielding the effective detuning assumes a clear separation J ≫ γ and J ≫ residual external couplings. The disordered 2D dipolar ensemble does not enforce this hierarchy uniformly; configurations with comparable couplings will invalidate the perturbative step, and the slowest Lindblad eigenvalue will not exhibit the claimed parametric enhancement. The manuscript should either restrict the ensemble to verified hierarchies or quantify the fraction of samples where the assumption fails.
  2. [simulations of disordered spin configurations] Numerical simulations of disordered configurations: the reported orders-of-magnitude slowing is presented without error bars on the slowest eigenvalue or explicit checks that the weak-dephasing regime (γ small) is maintained across the sampled disorder realizations. If post-selection of configurations with strong internal hybridization is implicit, this must be stated and the selection criterion quantified.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract] The abstract and introduction use 'parametrically enhanced' without a precise definition (e.g., scaling with a specific small parameter); this should be clarified with reference to the analytic expression for the longest timescale.
  2. [model definition] Notation for the dipolar interaction strength and dephasing rate γ is introduced without an explicit table of symbols; a short notation table would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. The points raised regarding the assumptions in the minimal model and the statistical robustness of the simulations are well taken. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation while preserving the central claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [minimal three-site model] Three-site model derivation (the minimal model section): the adiabatic elimination yielding the effective detuning assumes a clear separation J ≫ γ and J ≫ residual external couplings. The disordered 2D dipolar ensemble does not enforce this hierarchy uniformly; configurations with comparable couplings will invalidate the perturbative step, and the slowest Lindblad eigenvalue will not exhibit the claimed parametric enhancement. The manuscript should either restrict the ensemble to verified hierarchies or quantify the fraction of samples where the assumption fails.

    Authors: We agree that the adiabatic elimination in the three-site model requires a clear separation of scales (J ≫ γ and J ≫ residual couplings) for the effective detuning to be valid. The minimal model is presented as an illustrative derivation of the mechanism rather than a universal description of every configuration. In the ensemble simulations, the pronounced slowing of the slowest eigenvalue is observed specifically in realizations exhibiting strong internal hybridization and hierarchical couplings, consistent with the geometric heterogeneity emphasized in the abstract and main text. To address the concern, we will add a supplementary analysis in the revised manuscript that quantifies the fraction of sampled configurations satisfying a hierarchy criterion (e.g., the ratio of the largest intra-cluster coupling to the largest external coupling exceeding 5). We will also show that the parametric enhancement of the relaxation time correlates strongly with this measure, thereby clarifying the regime of applicability without restricting the ensemble a priori. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [simulations of disordered spin configurations] Numerical simulations of disordered configurations: the reported orders-of-magnitude slowing is presented without error bars on the slowest eigenvalue or explicit checks that the weak-dephasing regime (γ small) is maintained across the sampled disorder realizations. If post-selection of configurations with strong internal hybridization is implicit, this must be stated and the selection criterion quantified.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for statistical rigor in the ensemble results. The simulations sample configurations from the full disordered ensemble without post-selection; the orders-of-magnitude slowing appears as a natural consequence in those realizations where geometric heterogeneity produces strongly hybridized clusters. In the revised manuscript we will (i) report error bars on the slowest Lindblad eigenvalue, computed as the standard error of the mean over the ensemble, and (ii) include an explicit check of the weak-dephasing condition by showing the distribution of relevant J/γ ratios across samples. We will also add a scatter plot correlating a quantitative hierarchy measure (ratio of intra- to inter-cluster couplings) with the observed relaxation time, thereby making transparent that the effect is tied to the presence of hierarchical structure rather than any hidden selection. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: timescales derived from direct master-equation analysis and minimal-model diagonalization

full rationale

The paper obtains the longest relaxation timescale by numerically solving the Lindblad master equation on disordered networks and on a minimal three-site subsystem, then interpreting the slow eigenvalue via hybridization-induced detuning in the weak-dephasing limit. This follows from the explicit Hamiltonian (dipolar couplings) plus local dephasing dissipator without redefining the target quantity in terms of itself. Nonequilibrium steady-state currents and ensemble simulations supply independent corroboration. No load-bearing self-citation, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or ansatz smuggled via prior work appears in the derivation chain. The skeptic concern about rate hierarchies is a validity question, not a circularity reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model rests on standard open-quantum-system assumptions plus the specific choice of dipolar form and local dephasing; no new entities are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Dipolar interaction form is an adequate approximation for the spin-spin couplings in the network.
    Invoked when setting up the two-dimensional tight-binding Hamiltonian.
  • domain assumption Dephasing is local and Markovian.
    Used to define the dissipative dynamics throughout the calculations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5508 in / 1373 out tokens · 50968 ms · 2026-05-12T03:11:29.751489+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 116 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Liouvillian spectrum Dissipative dynamics can be characterized by analyz- ing the eigenvalues and eigenstates of the Liouvillian, Eq. (4). The decay rate, denoted byγ, is given by the neg- ative real part of each eigenvalue, while the imaginary part determines the corresponding oscillation frequency. We present our results for configuration A in Figs. 18-...

    work page

  2. [2]

    MFPT and residence times We study the dynamics using the following measures: population dynamics from a certain initial condition, pu- rity of the state Tr[ρ(t) 2], and and measures for survival and transfer times, which we now define by modifying the traditional definitions of the mean first passage time. Consider anN+ 2 site system; the network itself i...

    work page

  3. [3]

    This expression admits an equivalent spectral represen- tation

    Integrated relaxation and transfer measures We consider open system dynamics generated by a Li- ouvillian superoperator ˆL, ˙ˆρ(t) =ˆLˆρ(t),ˆρ(t) =e ˆLt ˆρ(0).(A5) Assuming that population in the physical subspace de- cays at long times, as ensured for example by introducing an absorbing trap, ⟨i|ρ(t→ ∞)|i⟩= 0,∀i(A6) the time integrated density matrix is ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    20 the histogram of all pair- wise couplings,J ij across the bath

    Pairwise coupling distribution We first examine in Fig. 20 the histogram of all pair- wise couplings,J ij across the bath. AsNincreases at a fixed density, the distribution develops an additional weight at smallJ ij values. This is expected: Enlarging the system adds more distant pairs, and since the inter- action decays as a power law with distance, thes...

    work page

  5. [5]

    row-wise

    Local observables To focus on local effects, we now analyze site re- solved observables defined “row-wise” from the Hamil- tonian matrix. We define the following observables: S(1) i = X j̸=i |Jij|, S (2) i = sX j̸=i |Jij|2, M i = max j̸=i |Jij|. (B1) 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 1 100 S(1) i 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08Probability per bin N=10 N=20 N=30 N=40 FIG. 21.His...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Global extreme statistics We define the maximum coupling of theN-spin bath as J(bath) max = max i,j |Jij|.(B2) In contrast to local observables, the histogram ofJ (bath) max systematically shifts toward larger values asNincreases; see Fig. 24. This behavior is expected since the total number of pairwise couplings scales asN 2, and therefore the probabilit...

    work page

  7. [7]

    (ii) Global extreme couplings scale with system size

    Physical interpretation The combined analysis of local and global observables leads to clear conclusions: (i) Local geometric statistics are controlled by density and remain invariant withN. (ii) Global extreme couplings scale with system size. Appendix C: Ensemble statistics of finite spin baths: Fixed radius The analysis presented in Figs. 25-26 corresp...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Creatore, M

    C. Creatore, M. A. Parker, S. Emmott, and A. W. Chin, Efficient biologically inspired photocell enhanced by de- localized quantum states, Physical Review Letters111, 253601 (2013)

    work page 2013

  9. [9]

    Fruchtman, R

    A. Fruchtman, R. G´ omez-Bombarelli, B. W. Lovett, and E. M. Gauger, Photocell optimization using dark state protection, Physical Review Letters117, 203603 (2016)

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    A. D. Sio and C. Lienau, Vibronic coupling in organic semiconductors for photovoltaics, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics19, 18813 (2017), published on 26 June 2017

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    D. M. Rouse, E. M. Gauger, and B. W. Lovett, Optimal 25 power generation using dark states in dimers strongly coupled to their environment, New Journal of Physics 21, 063025 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Cavassilas, D

    N. Cavassilas, D. Suchet, A. Delamarre, J.-F. Guille- moles, F. Michelini, M. Bescond, and M. Lannoo, Opti- mized operation of quantum-dot intermediate-band so- lar cells deduced from electronic transport modeling, Physical Review Applied13, 044035 (2020)

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Hu and A

    L. Hu and A. Mandelis, Advanced characterization methods of carrier transport in quantum dot photo- voltaic solar cells, Journal of Applied Physics129, 10.1063/5.0029440 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0029440 2021

  14. [14]

    Bose, Quantum communication through an unmod- ulated spin chain, Phys

    S. Bose, Quantum communication through an unmod- ulated spin chain, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 207901 (2003)

    work page 2003

  15. [15]

    R. J. Chapman, M. Santandrea, Z. Huang, G. Corrielli, A. Crespi, M.-H. Yung, R. Osellame, and A. Peruzzo, Experimental perfect quantum state transfer, Nature Communications7, 11339 (2016)

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    X. Li, Y. Ma, J. Han, T. Chen, Y. Xu, W. Cai, H. Wang, Y. Song, Z.-Y. Xue, Z.-q. Yin, and L. Sun, Perfect quan- tum state transfer in a superconducting qubit chain with parametrically tunable couplings, Phys. Rev. Appl.10, 054009 (2018)

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    Mohseni, P

    M. Mohseni, P. Rebentrost, S. Lloyd, and A. Aspuru- Guzik, Environment-assisted quantum walks in pho- tosynthetic energy transfer, The Journal of Chemical Physics129, 174106 (2008)

    work page 2008

  18. [18]

    M. B. Plenio and S. F. Huelga, Dephasing-assisted transport: quantum networks and biomolecules, New Journal of Physics10, 113019 (2008)

    work page 2008

  19. [19]

    Caruso, A

    F. Caruso, A. W. Chin, A. Datta, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Highly efficient energy excitation trans- fer in light-harvesting complexes: The fundamental role of noise-assisted transport, The Journal of Chemical Physics131, 105106 (2009)

    work page 2009

  20. [20]

    A. W. Chin, A. Datta, F. Caruso, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Noise-assisted energy transfer in quantum networks and light-harvesting complexes, New Journal of Physics12, 065002 (2010)

    work page 2010

  21. [21]

    A. W. Chin, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Coher- ence and decoherence in biological systems: principles of noise-assisted transport and the origin of long-lived coherences, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal So- ciety A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sci- ences370, 3638 (2012)

    work page 2012

  22. [22]

    J. Wu, R. J. Silbey, and J. Cao, Generic mechanism of optimal energy transfer efficiency: A scaling theory of the mean first-passage time in exciton systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 200402 (2013)

    work page 2013

  23. [23]

    Mattioni, F

    A. Mattioni, F. Caycedo-Soler, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Design principles for long-range energy transfer at room temperature, Physical Review X11, 041003 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Mohseni, A

    M. Mohseni, A. Shabani, S. Lloyd, and H. Rabitz, Energy-scales convergence for optimal and robust quan- tum transport in photosynthetic complexes, The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics140, 035102 (2014)

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    Trautmann and P

    N. Trautmann and P. Hauke, Trapped-ion quantum sim- ulation of excitation transport: Disordered, noisy, and long-range connected quantum networks, Physical Re- view A97, 023606 (2018)

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    Zerah-Harush and Y

    E. Zerah-Harush and Y. Dubi, Universal origin for environment-assisted quantum transport in exciton transfer networks, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters9, 1689 (2018)

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    Zerah-Harush and Y

    E. Zerah-Harush and Y. Dubi, Effects of disorder and interactions in environment assisted quantum transport, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023294 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Cygorek, M

    M. Cygorek, M. Cosacchi, A. Vagov, V. M. Axt, B. W. Lovett, J. Keeling, and E. M. Gauger, Simulation of open quantum systems by automated compression of arbitrary environments, Nature Physics18, 662 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    A. Kurt, M. A. C. Rossi, and J. Piilo, Quantum trans- port efficiency in noisy random-removal and small-world networks, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and The- oretical56, 145301 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Cao and R

    J. Cao and R. J. Silbey, Optimization of exciton trap- ping in energy transfer processes, The Journal of Phys- ical Chemistry A113, 13825 (2009)

    work page 2009

  31. [31]

    Lawrence, M

    M. Lawrence, M. Pocrnic, E. Fung, J. Carrasquilla, E. M. Gauger, and D. Segal, Discovery of energy land- scapes toward optimized quantum transport: Environ- mental effects and long-range tunneling, Phys. Rev. Res. 8, 013163 (2026)

    work page 2026

  32. [32]

    Rebentrost, M

    P. Rebentrost, M. Mohseni, I. Kassal, S. Lloyd, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Environment-assisted quantum transport, New J. Phys.11, 033003 (2009)

    work page 2009

  33. [33]

    A. R. Coates, B. W. Lovett, and E. M. Gauger, Local- isation determines the optimal noise rate for quantum transport, New Journal of Physics23, 123014 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [35]

    Design Principles for Enhanced Quantum Transport with Site-Dependent Noise

    M. Lawrence, E. Wang, and D. Segal, Design principles for enhanced quantum transport with site-dependent noise, arXiv preprint (2026), arXiv:2604.23005 [quant- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  35. [36]

    C. Zu, F. Machado, B. Ye, J. Greiner, R. Markham, J. Choi, J. Koˇ sata, C. H. Baldwin, M. Zaletel, and N. Y. Yao, Emergent hydrodynamics in a strongly interacting dipolar spin ensemble, Nature597, 45 (2021)

    work page 2021

  36. [37]

    A. R. Coates, B. W. Lovett, and E. M. Gauger, From goldilocks to twin peaks: multiple optimal regimes for quantum transport in disordered networks, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics25, 10103 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [38]

    Y. Cho, D. Jasrasaria, K. G. Ray, D. M. Tennant, V. Lordi, J. L. DuBois, and Y. J. Rosen, Simulating noise on a quantum processor: interactions between a qubit and resonant two-level system bath, Quantum Sci- ence and Technology7, 045001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [39]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, Decoherence, inThe Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007) Chap. Decoherence, pp. 219–282

    work page 2007

  39. [40]

    Nitzan,Chemical Dynamics in Condensed Phases: Relaxation, Transfer, and Reactions in Condensed Molecular Systems, Oxford Graduate Texts (OUP Ox- ford, 2013)

    A. Nitzan,Chemical Dynamics in Condensed Phases: Relaxation, Transfer, and Reactions in Condensed Molecular Systems, Oxford Graduate Texts (OUP Ox- ford, 2013)

    work page 2013

  40. [41]

    Manzano, A short introduction to the lindblad mas- ter equation, AIP Advances10, 025106 (2020)

    D. Manzano, A short introduction to the lindblad mas- ter equation, AIP Advances10, 025106 (2020)

    work page 2020

  41. [42]

    Rivas and S

    A. Rivas and S. F. Huelga,Open Quantum Systems: An Introduction, 1st ed., SpringerBriefs in Physics (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011) p. 97

    work page 2011

  42. [43]

    Cai and T

    Z. Cai and T. Barthel, Algebraic versus exponential de- coherence in dissipative many-particle systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 150403 (2013)

    work page 2013

  43. [44]

    Bonnes, D

    L. Bonnes, D. Charrier, and A. M. L¨ auchli, Dynami- cal and steady-state properties of a bose-hubbard chain 26 with bond dissipation: A study based on matrix prod- uct operators, Phys. Rev. A90, 033612 (2014)

    work page 2014

  44. [45]

    ˇZnidariˇ c, Relaxation times of dissipative many-body quantum systems, Phys

    M. ˇZnidariˇ c, Relaxation times of dissipative many-body quantum systems, Phys. Rev. E92, 042143 (2015)

    work page 2015

  45. [46]

    Mori and T

    T. Mori and T. Shirai, Resolving a discrepancy be- tween liouvillian gap and relaxation time in boundary- dissipated quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 230604 (2020)

    work page 2020

  46. [47]

    Mori and T

    T. Mori and T. Shirai, Symmetrized liouvillian gap in markovian open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 230404 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [48]

    Xiao and C

    D.-W. Xiao and C. Chen, Metastability in the dissipa- tive quantum rabi model, Phys. Rev. A113, 013735 (2026)

    work page 2026

  48. [49]

    B. Zhou, X. Wang, and S. Chen, Exponential size scaling of the liouvillian gap in boundary-dissipated systems with anderson localization, Phys. Rev. B106, 064203 (2022)

    work page 2022

  49. [50]

    Zhou, Universal predictors for mixing time more than liouvillian gap (2026), arXiv:2601.06256 [quant- ph]

    Y.-N. Zhou, Universal predictors for mixing time more than liouvillian gap (2026), arXiv:2601.06256 [quant- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2026

  50. [51]

    E. M. Kessler, G. Giedke, A. Imamoglu, S. F. Yelin, M. D. Lukin, and J. I. Cirac, Dissipative phase transi- tion in a central spin system, Phys. Rev. A86, 012116 (2012)

    work page 2012

  51. [52]

    Fitzpatrick, N

    M. Fitzpatrick, N. M. Sundaresan, A. C. Y. Li, J. Koch, and A. A. Houck, Observation of a dissipative phase transition in a one-dimensional circuit qed lattice, Phys. Rev. X7, 011016 (2017)

    work page 2017

  52. [54]

    Haga, Oscillating-mode gap: An indicator of phase transitions in open quantum many-body systems, Phys

    T. Haga, Oscillating-mode gap: An indicator of phase transitions in open quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. B110, 104303 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [55]

    Mori, Liouvillian-gap analysis of open quantum many-body systems in the weak dissipation limit, Phys

    T. Mori, Liouvillian-gap analysis of open quantum many-body systems in the weak dissipation limit, Phys. Rev. B109, 064311 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [56]

    Minganti, A

    F. Minganti, A. Biella, N. Bartolo, and C. Ciuti, Spec- tral theory of liouvillians for dissipative phase transi- tions, Phys. Rev. A98, 042118 (2018)

    work page 2018

  55. [57]

    T. Fink, A. Schade, S. H¨ ofling, C. Schneider, and A. Imamoglu, Signatures of a dissipative phase tran- sition in photon correlation measurements, Nature Physics14, 365 (2018)

    work page 2018

  56. [58]

    J. T. Young, A. V. Gorshkov, M. Foss-Feig, and M. F. Maghrebi, Nonequilibrium fixed points of coupled ising models, Phys. Rev. X10, 011039 (2020)

    work page 2020

  57. [59]

    Shibata and H

    N. Shibata and H. Katsura, Dissipative spin chain as a non-hermitian kitaev ladder, Phys. Rev. B99, 174303 (2019)

    work page 2019

  58. [60]

    K. Wang, F. Piazza, and D. J. Luitz, Hierarchy of re- laxation timescales in local random liouvillians, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 100604 (2020)

    work page 2020

  59. [61]

    N. D. Hartmann, J. L. Li, and D. J. Luitz, Fate of dissi- pative hierarchy of timescales in the presence of unitary dynamics, Phys. Rev. B109, 054203 (2024)

    work page 2024

  60. [62]

    O. E. Sommer, F. Piazza, and D. J. Luitz, Many-body hierarchy of dissipative timescales in a quantum com- puter, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 023190 (2021)

    work page 2021

  61. [63]

    T. Haga, M. Nakagawa, R. Hamazaki, and M. Ueda, Quasiparticles of decoherence processes in open quan- tum many-body systems: Incoherentons, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 043225 (2023)

    work page 2023

  62. [64]

    F. Ares, P. Calabrese, and S. Murciano, The quantum mpemba effects, Nature Reviews Physics7, 451 (2025)

    work page 2025

  63. [65]

    L. K. Joshi, J. Franke, A. Rath, F. Ares, S. Murciano, F. Kranzl, R. Blatt, P. Zoller, B. Vermersch, P. Cal- abrese, C. F. Roos, and M. K. Joshi, Observing the quantum mpemba effect in quantum simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 010402 (2024)

    work page 2024

  64. [66]

    Zhang, G

    J. Zhang, G. Xia, C.-W. Wu, T. Chen, Q. Zhang, Y. Xie, W.-B. Su, W. Wu, C.-W. Qiu, P.-X. Chen, W. Li, H. Jing, and Y.-L. Zhou, Observation of quantum strong mpemba effect, Nature Communications16, 301 (2025)

    work page 2025

  65. [67]

    D. Liu, J. Yuan, H. Ruan, Y. Xu, S. Luo, J. He, X. He, Y. Ma, and J. Wang, Speeding up quantum heat engines by the mpemba effect, Phys. Rev. A110, 042218 (2024)

    work page 2024

  66. [68]

    Medina, O

    I. Medina, O. Culhane, F. C. Binder, G. T. Landi, and J. Goold, Anomalous discharging of quantum batteries: The ergotropic mpemba effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 220402 (2025)

    work page 2025

  67. [69]

    A. K. Chatterjee, S. Takada, and H. Hayakawa, Mul- tiple quantum mpemba effect: Exceptional points and oscillations, Phys. Rev. A110, 022213 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [70]

    A. K. Chatterjee, S. Takada, and H. Hayakawa, Quan- tum mpemba effect in a quantum dot with reservoirs, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 080402 (2023)

    work page 2023

  69. [71]

    Wang and J

    X. Wang and J. Wang, Mpemba effects in nonequilib- rium open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033330 (2024)

    work page 2024

  70. [72]

    Longhi, Quantum mpemba effect from non-normal dynamics, Entropy27, 10.3390/e27060581 (2025)

    S. Longhi, Quantum mpemba effect from non-normal dynamics, Entropy27, 10.3390/e27060581 (2025)

    work page doi:10.3390/e27060581 2025

  71. [73]

    Calabrese, The quantum mpemba effect in closed sys- tems: from theory to experiment, Journal of Statisti- cal Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2026, 034002 (2026)

    P. Calabrese, The quantum mpemba effect in closed sys- tems: from theory to experiment, Journal of Statisti- cal Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2026, 034002 (2026)

    work page 2026

  72. [74]

    Ma and J

    W. Ma and J. Liu, Quantum mpemba effect in parity- time symmetric systems, Phys. Rev. B112, 214310 (2025)

    work page 2025

  73. [75]

    Yu, T.-R

    Y.-H. Yu, T.-R. Jin, L. Zhang, K. Xu, and H. Fan, Tun- ing the quantum mpemba effect in an isolated system by initial-state engineering, Phys. Rev. B112, 094315 (2025)

    work page 2025

  74. [76]

    Y. Li, W. Li, and X. Li, Ergotropic mpemba effect in non-markovian quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A112, 032209 (2025)

    work page 2025

  75. [77]

    T. V. Tscherbul and P. Brumer, Long-lived quasista- tionary coherences in a v-type system driven by inco- herent light, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 113601 (2014)

    work page 2014

  76. [78]

    T. V. Tscherbul and P. Brumer, Partial secular bloch- redfield master equation for incoherent excitation of multilevel quantum systems, J. Chem. Phys.142, 104107 (2015)

    work page 2015

  77. [79]

    Merkli, H

    M. Merkli, H. Song, and G. P. Berman, Multiscale dy- namics of open three-level quantum systems with two quasi-degenerate levels, Journal of Physics A: Mathe- matical and Theoretical48, 275304 (2015)

    work page 2015

  78. [80]

    Dodin, T

    A. Dodin, T. V. Tscherbul, and P. Brumer, Quantum dynamics of incoherently driven v-type systems: Ana- lytic solutions beyond the secular approximation, The Journal of Chemical Physics144, 244108 (2016)

    work page 2016

  79. [81]

    Gerry, M

    M. Gerry, M. J. Kewming, and D. Segal, Understand- ing multiple timescales in quantum dissipative dynam- ics: Insights from quantum trajectories, Phys. Rev. Re- search6, 033106 (2024)

    work page 2024

  80. [82]

    Ivander, N

    F. Ivander, N. Anto-Sztrikacs, and D. Segal, Hyperac- celeration of quantum thermalization dynamics by by- 27 passing long-lived coherences: An analytical treatment, Phys. Rev. E108, 014130 (2023)

    work page 2023

Showing first 80 references.