pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.23005 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-24 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.dis-nn· cond-mat.mtrl-sci· physics.chem-ph

Design Principles for Enhanced Quantum Transport with Site-Dependent Noise

Maggie Lawrence , Elise Wang , Dvira Segal This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 11:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.chem-ph
keywords quantum transportenvironmental noisedephasingopen quantum systemsLindblad master equationlocalizationsite-dependent noisesteady-state flux
0
0 comments X

The pith

Site-dependent dephasing noise enhances quantum transport efficiency beyond uniform noise levels in lattices with energy ramps or disorder.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates how to optimize environmental dephasing to assist steady-state quantum transport in one-dimensional chains that would otherwise suffer from localization due to destructive interference. Rather than fixing a single dephasing strength everywhere, it treats the dephasing rate at each site as an adjustable parameter and finds the profile that maximizes population flux under a Lindblad master equation. For ramped potentials, short-range tunneling favors alternating high-low dephasing, while long-range tunneling favors a steadily increasing profile away from the source; disordered landscapes require stronger dephasing precisely at the most detuned sites when tunneling is short-range. In every case examined, the optimized local rates produce both higher flux and a more spatially extended steady-state population than any uniform rate. The work therefore frames spatially structured noise as a concrete control knob for balancing coherence and transport in open quantum systems.

Core claim

Within the Lindblad framework, independent local dephasing operators applied to each site of a lattice with either a linear ramp or random on-site energies can be chosen to maximize the steady-state current. For nearest-neighbor tunneling on a ramp, an alternating dephasing pattern is optimal; for long-range tunneling the optimal pattern rises with distance from the injection site. In disordered chains, sites with large energy offsets need elevated dephasing under short-range hopping. Across all regimes the site-optimized pattern yields higher transport efficiency than uniform dephasing while simultaneously increasing the spatial spread of the steady-state density matrix.

What carries the argument

Site-dependent dephasing rates realized as local Lindblad jump operators that broaden energy levels selectively to suppress destructive interference and overcome detuning.

If this is right

  • Optimal dephasing patterns depend on both the range of coherent tunneling and the type of energy landscape.
  • Higher transport is accompanied by greater spatial delocalization of the steady-state population.
  • Local dephasing acts by broadening selected energy levels, thereby reducing effective detuning and destructive interference.
  • The same optimization principle applies equally to short-range and long-range coherent couplings.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Structured noise could be realized in quantum-dot or cold-atom arrays by applying site-addressable laser or magnetic fields that control local decoherence.
  • The approach suggests a general design rule for open-system devices: engineer the environment spatially rather than globally to steer both transport and coherence.
  • Extensions to time-dependent or spatially correlated noise profiles remain open for further efficiency gains.

Load-bearing premise

Independent local dephasing rates at each site can be engineered and optimized without introducing extra system-environment couplings or non-Markovian back-action beyond the Lindblad description.

What would settle it

A controlled experiment that measures the steady-state population current (or flux) in a lattice with tunable local dephasing and finds that uniform rates match or exceed the flux obtained from any site-optimized profile would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.23005 by Dvira Segal, Elise Wang, Maggie Lawrence.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Three-site example of transfer behavior. (a) Energy structure in the form of a ramp with equidistant energy levels. view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Development of WS localization: Lattices with view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Population flux as a function of uniform dephasing view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Enhancing transport in a ramp potential for systems with power-law tunneling view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Analysis of coherence length and population flux in view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Development of Anderson localization in a disordered lattice of view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Population flux as a function of uniform dephasing view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Enhancing transport in an energetically disordered system with site-optimized dephasing. view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Distribution of all optimized view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Histogram of coherence lengths (left) and view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Boxplots of population flux improvements against binned coherence length ratios for disordered systems with view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: (a) Histogram of local energy mismatches view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Analysis of coherence length and flux in disordered view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: Overcoming WS localization in systems with power-law tunneling with powers of view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Overcoming Anderson localization in systems with power-law tunneling with powers of view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: Ramp system: Chains with view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17: Population flux as a function of uniform dephasing view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18: Overcoming WS localization in systems with power-law tunneling (a1-a3) view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Environmental noise can enhance transport, an effect known as environmental noise-assisted quantum transport. Most theoretical studies focus on optimizing system parameters under spatially uniform system-environment coupling. Here, instead, we optimize the environmental noise itself by allowing for site-dependent dephasing. We investigate steady-state transport in one-dimensional lattices with either ramped or disordered energy landscapes, considering both short- and long-range coherent tunneling. In the absence of environmental effects, in the thermodynamic limit these systems can exhibit localization, and thus suppressed transport, arising from destructive interference. Using a Lindblad master equation framework, we implement local dephasing optimized to maximize steady-state population flux. We find that for ramp potentials, short-range tunneling favors selective dephasing on alternating sites, whereas long-range tunneling benefits from a dephasing profile that increases with distance from the injection site. In energetically disordered systems, strongly detuned sites require enhanced local dephasing under short-range tunneling to facilitate transport. In all cases, we find that site-optimized dephasing allows higher transport efficiency than uniform dephasing, and it is accompanied by increased spatial delocalization of the steady state. Our results provide microscopic insight into the interplay between coherent dynamics and environmental noise. Dephasing broadens energy levels locally, helping to overcome detuning and destructive interference. More generally, we establish spatially-structured environmental noise as a strategy for controlling both quantum transport and state coherence in open systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims that, within the Lindblad master equation on finite 1D lattices with ramp or disordered onsite energies and either short- or long-range coherent tunneling, numerically optimizing independent local dephasing rates yields higher steady-state population flux than uniform dephasing. Distinct optimal dephasing profiles are reported (alternating sites for short-range ramps, distance-increasing for long-range, enhanced dephasing on strongly detuned sites for disorder), accompanied by greater spatial delocalization of the steady state. The improvement is attributed to local level broadening that mitigates destructive interference and detuning.

Significance. If the numerical results are robust, the work supplies concrete, profile-specific design rules for spatially structured noise that improve transport efficiency beyond the uniform-noise paradigm. It thereby extends the noise-assisted transport literature with microscopic insight into the interplay of coherence, detuning, and local dephasing, and offers a practical strategy for controlling both flux and delocalization in open quantum systems. The direct numerical maximization of steady-state flux under the Lindblad equation is a clear methodological strength.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods] Methods section: the manuscript provides no information on the lattice sizes employed, the numerical method used to obtain the steady-state density matrix (e.g., vectorization and linear solve versus iterative solvers), or the convergence criteria and tolerances of the optimization routine over the dephasing rates. These details are load-bearing for the central efficiency claims.
  2. [Results] Results, ramp-potential figures: the reported superiority of the alternating-site dephasing profile over uniform dephasing is shown only for the optimized values; no systematic scan or comparison against other structured profiles (e.g., linear or random) is presented to establish that the reported profile is globally optimal rather than a local maximum.
  3. [Disorder results] Disorder section: the claim that strongly detuned sites require enhanced local dephasing is supported by the optimization output, but the paper does not quantify how the improvement scales with disorder strength or with the number of detuned sites, leaving the generality of the design principle unclear.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the systems 'can exhibit localization... in the thermodynamic limit,' yet all presented data are for finite chains; a brief statement on finite-size scaling or extrapolation would strengthen the connection to the thermodynamic-limit motivation.
  2. [Model] Notation for the dephasing rates (presumably γ_i) and the flux observable should be defined explicitly in the main text before the optimization results are discussed.
  3. [Figures] Figure captions for the optimal dephasing profiles should include the numerical values of the maximized flux and the corresponding uniform-dephasing benchmark for direct comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. The points raised are helpful for improving clarity and strengthening the presentation of our results. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods] Methods section: the manuscript provides no information on the lattice sizes employed, the numerical method used to obtain the steady-state density matrix (e.g., vectorization and linear solve versus iterative solvers), or the convergence criteria and tolerances of the optimization routine over the dephasing rates. These details are load-bearing for the central efficiency claims.

    Authors: We agree that these details are necessary for full reproducibility and to underpin the efficiency claims. In the revised manuscript we will expand the Methods section to specify the lattice sizes used (N = 4–20 sites, with explicit values for each figure), state that the steady-state density matrix is obtained by vectorizing the Lindblad superoperator and solving the resulting linear system with a direct sparse solver, and describe the optimization as a bounded global search (differential evolution with population size 20, tolerance 10^{-6} on the objective, and dephasing rates constrained to [0, 10] in natural units). revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results, ramp-potential figures: the reported superiority of the alternating-site dephasing profile over uniform dephasing is shown only for the optimized values; no systematic scan or comparison against other structured profiles (e.g., linear or random) is presented to establish that the reported profile is globally optimal rather than a local maximum.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that optimality is not demonstrated by exhaustive comparison. Our numerical procedure employs a global stochastic optimizer with multiple random restarts, and the reported profiles emerge consistently; nevertheless, to address this concern directly we will add supplementary panels (or a new figure) that compare the optimized flux against fluxes obtained from linear, random, and constant-gradient profiles for representative ramp strengths. These comparisons will show that the optimizer-found profiles yield measurably higher steady-state flux. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Disorder results] Disorder section: the claim that strongly detuned sites require enhanced local dephasing is supported by the optimization output, but the paper does not quantify how the improvement scales with disorder strength or with the number of detuned sites, leaving the generality of the design principle unclear.

    Authors: We accept that scaling information would clarify the generality of the design rule. In the revised version we will include additional data (new panels or a short subsection) showing the relative flux improvement (site-optimized versus uniform dephasing) as a function of disorder variance for fixed N and as a function of the fraction of strongly detuned sites. This will quantify the robustness of the enhanced-dephasing principle across a range of disorder strengths. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results from direct numerical optimization

full rationale

The paper's claims arise from setting up the Lindblad master equation on finite 1D lattices, numerically optimizing site-dependent dephasing rates to maximize steady-state population flux, and comparing the resulting efficiencies and delocalization to the uniform-dephasing baseline. This workflow is self-contained: the flux is computed directly from the steady-state solution of the master equation, the optimization is a standard numerical procedure with no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, and no load-bearing steps reduce to self-citations or self-definitional relations. The abstract and described methodology contain no equations or arguments that equate outputs to inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the standard Lindblad master-equation description of local dephasing; no free parameters are fitted to external data and no new entities are postulated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption System dynamics are governed by a Lindblad master equation with site-local dephasing operators.
    This is the conventional framework for modeling pure dephasing in Markovian open quantum systems.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5566 in / 1171 out tokens · 61282 ms · 2026-05-08T11:50:41.691379+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantum Transport in Disordered Spin Networks: Emergent Timescales and Competing Pathways

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Geometric heterogeneity in small disordered spin networks with dipolar couplings and dephasing produces separated dynamical timescales, with a parametrically long relaxation time arising from effective detuning in str...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    physical

    It enforces a constant flow of carriers entering site 1 and leaving siteN, both at a rate constantγ l. Different combi- nations of injection and extraction sites may lead to different transport behaviors; see Refs. [66, 97]. We chose the ends of the chain for the extraction and injection sites, in order to achieve transport over the longest distance allow...

  2. [2]

    trajectories

    Simulations In Figs. 1(b)-(d), we present the population fluxη=γ lρ3,3 as a function ofΓ 2 andΓ 3; with only two free parameters, the population flux landscape can be easily visualized. The results are shown for three values of the tunneling range pa- rameter,α= 1,α= 3, andα= 5, corresponding to long- , intermediate-, and short-range tunneling, respective...

  3. [3]

    First, we focus on the nearest neighbors (NN) case, corresponding toα= 5

    Analytical results: Nearest neighbor tunneling We support numerical observations by analytically solv- ing the approximate transport problem. First, we focus on the nearest neighbors (NN) case, corresponding toα= 5. Relevant simulation results are shown in Fig. 1(d). We use the energy structure as depicted in Fig. 1(a), defining ∆ =|ε 2 −ε 1|=|ε 3 −ε 2|an...

  4. [4]

    Analytic results: Long range tunneling We now consider the case of long range (LR) tunneling, re- lated toα= 1, with relevant results depicted in Fig. 1(b). For simplicity, here we use identical values for the tunneling energies,J=J 2 =J 1. Under assumptions of small tunnel- ing energy and leak rates compared to energy levels difference and dephasing,J, γ...

  5. [5]

    [4∆2 (3Γ2 + Γ3) + Γ2 (3Γ2 2 + 5Γ2Γ3 + 2Γ2 3)] +O(J 3).(8) Expanding this result inΓ 3 we get ηLR(Γ3 <Γ 2) = 4Γ2 J 2 3 (4∆2 + Γ2

  6. [6]

    Specifically, when∆<Γ 2 we get ηLR(Γ3 <Γ 2,∆<Γ 2)≈4J 2/3Γ2.(10) For identical dephasing we get from Eq

    + 112∆4 + 8∆2Γ2 2 + 3Γ4 2 J 2 Γ3 18∆2 (4∆2 + Γ2 2)2 +O(Γ 2 3).(9) Since the second term is positive, we conclude that imple- mentingΓ 3 benefits transport. Specifically, when∆<Γ 2 we get ηLR(Γ3 <Γ 2,∆<Γ 2)≈4J 2/3Γ2.(10) For identical dephasing we get from Eq. (8), ηLR(Γ2 = Γ3) = 8Γ2 11∆2 + 2Γ2 2 J 2 (16∆2 + Γ2

  7. [7]

    ,(11) thus, when,∆<Γ 2 ηLR(Γ3 = Γ2,∆<Γ 2)≈16J 2/5Γ2,(12) which is larger than the comparable limit, Eq. (10). We con- clude that under a long range tunneling process, particle trans- fer is higher when dephasing is enacted on both sites, 2 and 3, contrasting the nearest neighbor tunneling limit. Generalizing, the main insight from this exercise is that in...

  8. [8]

    Here, we continue with the exploration of site-optimized dephasing strength to further enhance transport

    examined the case with randomly-placed onsite dephas- ing. Here, we continue with the exploration of site-optimized dephasing strength to further enhance transport. We consider a finite system of 12 sites, observing signatures of localization physics. Within this setting, we investigate how locally-tuned dephasing can be used to optimize transport. A. Rep...

  9. [9]

    Creatore, M

    C. Creatore, M. A. Parker, S. Emmott, and A. W. Chin, Effi- cient biologically inspired photocell enhanced by delocalized quantum states, Physical Review Letters111, 253601 (2013)

    2013

  10. [10]

    Fruchtman, R

    A. Fruchtman, R. G ´omez-Bombarelli, B. W. Lovett, and E. M. Gauger, Photocell optimization using dark state protection, Physical Review Letters117, 203603 (2016)

    2016

  11. [11]

    A. D. Sio and C. Lienau, Vibronic coupling in organic semi- conductors for photovoltaics, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics19, 18813 (2017), published on 26 June 2017

    2017

  12. [12]

    D. M. Rouse, E. M. Gauger, and B. W. Lovett, Optimal power generation using dark states in dimers strongly coupled to their environment, New Journal of Physics21, 063025 (2019)

    2019

  13. [13]

    Cavassilas, D

    N. Cavassilas, D. Suchet, A. Delamarre, J.-F. Guillemoles, F. Michelini, M. Bescond, and M. Lannoo, Optimized oper- ation of quantum-dot intermediate-band solar cells deduced from electronic transport modeling, Physical Review Applied 13, 044035 (2020)

    2020

  14. [14]

    Hu and A

    L. Hu and A. Mandelis, Advanced characterization methods of carrier transport in quantum dot photovoltaic solar cells, Journal of Applied Physics129, 10.1063/5.0029440 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0029440 2021

  15. [15]

    S. Lei, K. Yu, B. Xiao, M. Zhang, H. Tao, L. Hu, L. Zou, Q. You, X. Wang, X. Liu, J. Liu, and R. Yang, Temperature- dependent transition of charge transport in core/shell struc- tured colloidal quantum dot thin films: From poole–frenkel emission to variable-range hopping, Applied Physics Letters 121, 10.1063/5.0100130 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0100130 2022

  16. [16]

    Y . Yang, Y . Zheng, W. Cao, A. Titov, J. Hyvonen, J. R. Man- ders, J. Xue, P. H. Holloway, and L. Qian, High-efficiency light-emitting devices based on quantum dots with tailored nanostructures, Nature Photonics9, 259 (2015)

    2015

  17. [17]

    R. A. Bush, E. D. Ochoa, and J. K. Perron, Transport through quantum dots: An introduction via master equation simula- tions, American Journal of Physics89, 300 (2021)

    2021

  18. [18]

    M. A. Bahadou, A. E. Allati, and K. E. Anouz, Quantum trans- port through a quantum dot coupled to a pair of supercon- ducting topological nanowires, Physica Scripta100, 045920 (2025)

    2025

  19. [19]

    L. D. Contreras-Pulido and M. Bruderer, Coherent and inco- herent charge transport in linear triple quantum dots, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter29, 185301 (2017)

    2017

  20. [20]

    J.-M. Wang, R. Wang, and J.-Q. Liang, Spin-polarized quan- tum transport through an aharonov–bohm quantum-dot-ring, Chinese Physics16, 2075 (2007)

    2075

  21. [21]

    N. R. Abdullah, A. H. Fatah, and J. M. A. Fatah, Effects of magnetic field on photon-induced quantum transport in a sin- gle dot-cavity system, Chinese Physics B25, 114206 (2016). 17

    2016

  22. [22]

    M ´ath´e, D

    L. M ´ath´e, D. Sticlet, and L. P. Z ˆarbo, Quantum transport through a quantum dot side-coupled to a majorana bound state pair in the presence of electron-phonon interaction, Physical Review B105, 155409 (2022)

    2022

  23. [23]

    S. Chen, H. Xie, Y . Zhang, X. Cui, and G. Chen, Quantum transport through an array of quantum dots, Nanoscale5, 169 (2013)

    2013

  24. [24]

    P. R. Eastham, A. O. Spracklen, and J. Keeling, Lindblad the- ory of dynamical decoherence of quantum-dot excitons, Phys. Rev. B87, 195306 (2013)

    2013

  25. [25]

    P. W. Anderson, Absence of diffusion in certain random lat- tices, Phys. Rev.109, 1492 (1958)

    1958

  26. [26]

    Kramer and A

    B. Kramer and A. MacKinnon, Localization: theory and ex- periment, Rep. Prog. Phys.56, 1469 (1993)

    1993

  27. [27]

    Lahini, A

    Y . Lahini, A. Avidan, F. Pozzi, M. Sorel, R. Morandotti, D. N. Christodoulides, and Y . Silberberg, Anderson localization and nonlinearity in one-dimensional disordered photonic lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 013906 (2008)

    2008

  28. [29]

    G. H. Wannier, Dynamics of band electrons in electric and magnetic fields, Rev. Mod. Phys.34, 645 (1962)

    1962

  29. [30]

    Emin and C

    D. Emin and C. F. Hart, Existence of wannier-stark localiza- tion, Phys. Rev. B36, 7353 (1987)

    1987

  30. [31]

    Gl ¨uck, A

    M. Gl ¨uck, A. R. Kolovsky, and H. J. Korsch, Wannier–stark resonances in optical and semiconductor superlattices, Physics Reports366, 103 (2002)

    2002

  31. [32]

    Bandyopadhyay and S

    M. Bandyopadhyay and S. Dattagupta, Dissipative quantum transport in a nanowire, Phys. Rev. B104, 125401 (2021)

    2021

  32. [33]

    Davidson, A

    S. Davidson, A. Fruchtman, F. A. Pollock, and E. M. Gauger, The dark side of energy transport along excitonic wires: On- site energy barriers facilitate efficient, vibrationally mediated transport through optically dark subspaces, The Journal of Chemical Physics153, 134701 (2020)

    2020

  33. [34]

    Davidson, F

    S. Davidson, F. A. Pollock, and E. M. Gauger, Eliminating radiative losses in long-range exciton transport, PRX Quantum 3, 020354 (2022)

    2022

  34. [35]

    Aubry and G

    S. Aubry and G. Andr ´e, Analyticity breaking and anderson localization in incommensurate lattices, Annals of the Israel Physical Society3, 133 (1980)

    1980

  35. [36]

    P. G. Harper, Single band motion of conduction electrons in a uniform magnetic field, Proceedings of the Physical Society A 68, 874 (1955)

    1955

  36. [37]

    X. Li, X. Li, and S. Das Sarma, Mobility edges in one- dimensional bichromatic incommensurate potentials, Phys. Rev. B96, 085119 (2017)

    2017

  37. [38]

    D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Collo- quium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entangle- ment, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 021001 (2019)

    2019

  38. [39]

    yoon Choi, S

    J. yoon Choi, S. Hild, J. Zeiher, P. Schauß, A. Rubio-Abadal, T. Yefsah, V . Khemani, D. A. Huse, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Exploring the many-body localization transition in two dimen- sions, Science352, 1547 (2016)

    2016

  39. [40]

    I. V . Gornyi, A. D. Mirlin, and D. G. Polyakov, Interacting electrons in disordered wires: Anderson localization and low- ttransport, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 206603 (2005)

    2005

  40. [41]

    D. A. Abanin, W. De Roeck, and F. Huveneers, Theory of many-body localization in periodically driven systems, Annals of Physics372, 1 (2016)

    2016

  41. [42]

    Morandotti, U

    R. Morandotti, U. Peschel, J. S. Aitchison, H. S. Eisenberg, and Y . Silberberg, Experimental observation of linear and non- linear optical bloch oscillations, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 4756 (1999)

    1999

  42. [43]

    Schwartz, G

    T. Schwartz, G. Bartal, S. Fishman, and M. Segev, Transport and anderson localization in disordered two-dimensional pho- tonic lattices, Nature446, 52 (2007)

    2007

  43. [44]

    Martin, G

    L. Martin, G. Di Giuseppe, A. Perez-Leija, R. Keil, F. Dreisow, M. Heinrich, S. Nolte, A. Szameit, A. F. Abouraddy, D. N. Christodoulides, and B. E. A. Saleh, Ander- son localization in optical waveguide arrays with off-diagonal coupling disorder, Optics Express19, 13636 (2011)

    2011

  44. [45]

    J. Gao, I. M. Khaymovich, A. Iovan, X.-W. Wang, G. Kr- ishna, Z.-S. Xu, E. Tortumlu, A. V . Balatsky, V . Zwiller, and A. W. Elshaari, Coexistence of extended and localized states in finite-sized mosaic wannier-stark lattices, Phys. Rev. B108, L140202 (2023)

    2023

  45. [46]

    Mukherjee, A

    S. Mukherjee, A. Spracklen, D. Choudhury, N. Goldman, P. ¨Ohberg, E. Andersson, and R. R. Thomson, Modulation- assisted tunneling in laser-fabricated photonic wannier–stark ladders, New Journal of Physics17, 115002 (2015)

    2015

  46. [47]

    Billy, V

    J. Billy, V . Josse, Z. Zuo, A. Bernard, B. Hambrecht, P. Lugan, D. Cl ´ement, L. Sanchez-Palencia, P. Bouyer, and A. Aspect, Direct observation of anderson localization of matter waves in a controlled disorder, Nature453, 891 (2008)

    2008

  47. [48]

    Chab ´e, G

    J. Chab ´e, G. Lemari´e, B. Gr´emaud, D. Delande, P. Szriftgiser, and J. C. Garreau, Experimental observation of the ander- son metal-insulator transition with atomic matter waves, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 255702 (2008)

    2008

  48. [49]

    F. L. Moore, J. C. Robinson, C. Bharucha, P. E. Williams, and M. G. Raizen, Observation of dynamical localization in atomic momentum transfer: A new testing ground for quantum chaos, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 2974 (1994)

    1994

  49. [50]

    Manai, J.-F

    I. Manai, J.-F. Cl ´ement, R. Chicireanu, C. Hainaut, J. C. Gar- reau, P. Szriftgiser, and D. Delande, Experimental observa- tion of two-dimensional anderson localization with the atomic kicked rotor, Physical Review Letters115, 240603 (2015)

    2015

  50. [51]

    A. H. Karamlou, J. Braum ¨uller, Y . Yanay, A. Di Paolo, P. M. Harrington, B. Kannan, D. Kim, M. Kjaergaard, A. Melville, S. Muschinske, B. M. Niedzielski, A. Veps ¨al¨ainen, R. Winik, J. L. Yoder, M. Schwartz, C. Tahan, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavs- son, and W. D. Oliver, Quantum transport and localization in 1d and 2d tight-binding lattices, npj Quantum In...

    2022

  51. [52]

    Guo, Z.-Y

    X.-Y . Guo, Z.-Y . Ge, H. Li, Z. Wang, Y .-R. Zhang, P. Song, Z. Xiang, X. Song, Y . Jin, L. Lu, K. Xu, D. Zheng, and H. Fan, Observation of bloch oscillations and wannier-stark localiza- tion on a superconducting quantum processor, npj Quantum Information7, 51 (2021)

    2021

  52. [53]

    P. Song, Z. Xiang, Y .-X. Zhang, Z. Wang, X. Guo, X. Ruan, X. Song, K. Xu, Y . Y . Gao, H. Fan, and D. Zheng, Coherent control of bloch oscillations in a superconducting circuit, PRX Quantum5, 020302 (2024)

    2024

  53. [54]

    Mohseni, P

    M. Mohseni, P. Rebentrost, S. Lloyd, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Environment-assisted quantum walks in photosynthetic en- ergy transfer, The Journal of Chemical Physics129, 174106 (2008)

    2008

  54. [55]

    M. B. Plenio and S. F. Huelga, Dephasing-assisted transport: quantum networks and biomolecules, New Journal of Physics 10, 113019 (2008)

    2008

  55. [56]

    Caruso, A

    F. Caruso, A. W. Chin, A. Datta, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Highly efficient energy excitation transfer in light- harvesting complexes: The fundamental role of noise-assisted transport, The Journal of Chemical Physics131, 105106 (2009)

    2009

  56. [57]

    Rebentrost, M

    P. Rebentrost, M. Mohseni, I. Kassal, S. Lloyd, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Environment-assisted quantum transport, New Journal of Physics11, 033003 (2009). 18

    2009

  57. [58]

    A. W. Chin, A. Datta, F. Caruso, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Noise-assisted energy transfer in quantum networks and light-harvesting complexes, New Journal of Physics12, 065002 (2010)

    2010

  58. [59]

    J. Wu, F. Liu, Y . Shen, J. Cao, and R. Silbey, Efficient energy transfer in light-harvesting systems, i: optimal temperature, reorganization energy and spatial-temporal correlations, New Journal of Physics12, 105012 (2010)

    2010

  59. [60]

    J. Wu, F. Liu, J. Ma, R. J. Silbey, and J. Cao, Efficient en- ergy transfer in light-harvesting systems: Quantum-classical comparison, flux network, and robustness analysis, Journal of Chemical Physics137, 174111 (2012)

    2012

  60. [61]

    J. Moix, J. Wu, P. Huo, D. Coker, and J. Cao, Efficient en- ergy transfer in light-harvesting systems, iii: The influence of the eight bacteriochlorophyll on the dynamics and efficiency in fmo, The Journal Of Physical Chemistry Letters2, 3045 (2011)

    2011

  61. [62]

    A. W. Chin, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Coherence and de- coherence in biological systems: principles of noise-assisted transport and the origin of long-lived coherences, Philosophi- cal Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Phys- ical and Engineering Sciences370, 3638 (2012)

    2012

  62. [63]

    R. d. J. Le ´on-Montiel, I. Kassal, and J. P. Torres, Impor- tance of excitation and trapping conditions in photosynthetic environment-assisted energy transport, The Journal of Physi- cal Chemistry B118, 10588 (2014)

    2014

  63. [64]

    Mattioni, F

    A. Mattioni, F. Caycedo-Soler, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Ple- nio, Design principles for long-range energy transfer at room temperature, Physical Review X11, 041003 (2021)

    2021

  64. [65]

    Mohseni, A

    M. Mohseni, A. Shabani, S. Lloyd, and H. Rabitz, Energy- scales convergence for optimal and robust quantum transport in photosynthetic complexes, The Journal of Chemical Physics 140, 035102 (2014)

    2014

  65. [66]

    Zerah-Harush and Y

    E. Zerah-Harush and Y . Dubi, Universal origin for environment-assisted quantum transport in exciton trans- fer networks, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters9, 1689 (2018)

    2018

  66. [67]

    Manzano, Quantum transport in networks and photosyn- thetic complexes at the steady state, PLOS ONE8, e57041 (2013)

    D. Manzano, Quantum transport in networks and photosyn- thetic complexes at the steady state, PLOS ONE8, e57041 (2013)

    2013

  67. [68]

    Kassal and A

    I. Kassal and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Environment-assisted quan- tum transport in ordered systems, New Journal of Physics14, 053041 (2012)

    2012

  68. [69]

    Werren, W

    N. Werren, W. Brown, and E. M. Gauger, Light harvesting enhanced by quantum ratchet states, PRX Energy2, 013002 (2023)

    2023

  69. [70]

    Tomasi, D

    S. Tomasi, D. M. Rouse, E. M. Gauger, B. W. Lovett, and I. Kassal, Environmentally improved coherent light harvest- ing, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters12, 6143 (2021)

    2021

  70. [71]

    Viciani, M

    S. Viciani, M. Lima, M. Bellini, and F. Caruso, Observation of noise-assisted transport in an all-optical cavity-based network, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 083601 (2015)

    2015

  71. [72]

    D. N. Biggerstaff, R. Heilmann, A. A. Zecevik, M. Gr ¨afe, M. A. Broome, A. Fedrizzi, S. Nolte, A. Szameit, A. G. White, and I. Kassal, Enhancing coherent transport in a photonic network using controllable decoherence, Nature Communica- tions7, 11282 (2016)

    2016

  72. [73]

    Tang, X.-W

    H. Tang, X.-W. Shang, Z.-Y . Shi, T.-S. He, Z. Feng, T.-Y . Wang, R. Shi, H.-M. Wang, X. Tan, X.-Y . Xu, Y . Wang, J. Gao, M. S. Kim, and X.-M. Jin, Simulating photosynthetic energy transport on a photonic network, npj Quantum Information10, 29 (2024), received: 06 May 2023; Accepted: 19 February 2024; Published: 11 March 2024

    2024

  73. [74]

    Maier, T

    C. Maier, T. Brydges, P. Jurcevic, N. Trautmann, C. Hempel, B. P. Lanyon, P. Hauke, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Environment- assisted quantum transport in a 10-qubit network, Physical Re- view Letters122, 050501 (2019)

    2019

  74. [75]

    D. D. Blach, V . A. Lumsargis-Roth, C. Chuang,et al., Environment-assisted quantum transport of excitons in per- ovskite nanocrystal superlattices, Nature Communications16, 1270 (2025)

    2025

  75. [76]

    Sundelin, M

    S. Sundelin, M. A. Aamir, V . M. Kulkarni, C. Castillo- Moreno, and S. Gasparinetti, Quantum refrigeration powered by noise in a superconducting circuit, Nature Communications 17, 10.1038/s41467-025-67751-z (2026)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-67751-z 2026

  76. [77]

    C. M. Langlett and S. Xu, Noise-induced universal diffusive transport in fermionic chains, Phys. Rev. B108, L180303 (2023)

    2023

  77. [78]

    S. L. Jacob, L. P. Bettmann, A. M. Lacerda, K. Zawadzki, S. R. Clark, J. Goold, and J. J. Mendoza-Arenas, Dephasing- assisted transport in a tight-binding chain with a linear po- tential, Frontiers in Physics12, 10.3389/fphy.2024.1474018 (2024)

    work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2024.1474018 2024

  78. [79]

    Teretenkov and O

    A. Teretenkov and O. Lychkovskiy, Exact dynamics of quan- tum dissipative xx models: Wannier-stark localization in the fragmented operator space, Phys. Rev. B109, L140302 (2024)

    2024

  79. [80]

    ˇZnidariˇc, Dephasing-induced diffusive transport in the anisotropic heisenberg model, New Journal of Physics12, 043001 (2010)

    M. ˇZnidariˇc, Dephasing-induced diffusive transport in the anisotropic heisenberg model, New Journal of Physics12, 043001 (2010)

    2010

  80. [81]

    ˇZnidariˇc and M

    M. ˇZnidariˇc and M. Horvat, Transport in a disordered tight- binding chain with dephasing, The European Physical Journal B86, 67 (2013)

    2013

Showing first 80 references.