pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.10492 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.mes-hall· physics.optics

Recognition: no theorem link

Perspective on tailoring quantum coherence with electron beams

Nahid Talebi
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 04:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.optics
keywords quantum coherenceelectron beamssemiconductorsentanglementtwo-dimensional materialsquantum qubitsstrong coupling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Electron beams in microscopes can probe and manipulate quantum coherence and entanglement in semiconductors and two-dimensional materials.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that electron beams open a route to examine and control how semiconductor quantum qubits interact with their surroundings. This matters because better control of those interactions could support practical table-top quantum computing hardware. It reviews recent work showing that beams can deliver quantum-coherent probes of excitations and strong-coupling regimes in semiconductors and two-dimensional materials. The central perspective is that the same beams can be turned to tailor entanglement and correlations among quantum systems.

Core claim

Electron beams in electron microscopes have opened up a new avenue for the quantum-coherent probing of semiconductor excitations and strong-coupling effects, and they offer a route to manipulate the entanglement and correlations between quantum systems.

What carries the argument

Electron-beam probes inside electron microscopes, which interact with semiconductor quantum qubits to sustain coherence while reading out or altering excitations and entanglement.

If this is right

  • Table-top quantum computing hardware can exploit electron-microscope probes for qubit-environment control.
  • Strong-coupling effects between quantum systems become directly accessible through beam-induced coherence measurements.
  • Entanglement engineering in semiconductors and two-dimensional materials can proceed without relying solely on optical fields.
  • Correlations between multiple quantum emitters can be tuned by adjusting beam parameters such as energy and focus.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Hybrid platforms that combine electron microscopy with existing semiconductor fabrication lines could emerge for on-chip quantum state preparation.
  • The approach might extend to other beam-based techniques, such as ion or photon beams, for cross-validation of coherence control.
  • Time-resolved beam scanning could map spatial variations in entanglement, offering a diagnostic tool for material defects that affect qubit performance.

Load-bearing premise

Electron-beam interactions can achieve and maintain quantum coherence and entanglement control in real semiconductor systems without rapid decoherence or damage dominating the process.

What would settle it

A controlled experiment that either demonstrates sustained entanglement manipulation via an electron beam or shows that decoherence and damage always destroy the coherence on the relevant timescale.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.10492 by Nahid Talebi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Ramsey interferometry by the sequential interaction of the EDPHS radiation (green pulse) and the moving electron with a single defect. (b) Ramsey interference fringes of the CL signal versus the photon energy and lateral wavenumber acquired at depicted delays between the EDPHS radiation and the electron beam [13]. 𝑘|| a b [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) A scheme for merging shaped electron beams with two sequential optical pulses generated from EDPHS, for performing two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy of single solid-state qubits. (b) Generating entanglement between qubits via coherent interaction of an electron beam with a resonator combined with two qubits. ℏ𝜔 𝜏1 𝜏2 e - |𝑔ۧ |𝑒ۧ |𝑔ۧ |𝑒ۧ e - Resonator Qubit#1 Qubit#2 a b [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Examining and controlling the interaction between semiconductor quantum qubits and their environment can boost semiconductor quantum technologies, which have many applications in table-top quantum computing hardware. Electron beams in electron microscopes have opened up a new avenue for the quantum-coherent probing of semiconductor excitations and strong-coupling effects. Here, I provide a brief overview of recent advancements in electron-beam probes for investigating quantum coherence in semiconductors and two-dimensional materials, complemented by my perspective on using electron beams to manipulate the entanglement and correlations between quantum systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a perspective article reviewing recent experimental advancements in using electron beams from electron microscopes to probe quantum coherence, excitations, and strong-coupling effects in semiconductors and two-dimensional materials. It then offers the author's forward-looking perspective on employing these interactions to manipulate entanglement and correlations between quantum systems, with the goal of advancing semiconductor-based quantum technologies.

Significance. If the proposed avenue proves viable, the perspective could help stimulate interdisciplinary research by highlighting electron-beam probes as a spatially resolved complement to optical and electrical methods for coherent control in quantum materials. The manuscript earns credit for synthesizing recent experimental work on electron-beam interactions with quantum systems, providing a concise overview that may guide future experiments. However, its significance is tempered by the absence of quantitative discussion on feasibility.

major comments (1)
  1. [Perspective on manipulation] The central perspective on using electron beams to manipulate entanglement and correlations (as stated in the abstract and developed in the forward-looking section) rests on the assumption that beam-sample interactions can support coherent, unitary evolution on relevant timescales. No estimates, Fermi-golden-rule calculations, or citations to measured decoherence rates (T2) or damage thresholds under typical microscope beam currents and energies are provided, leaving open whether phonon/plasmon excitation or defect creation would dominate before useful manipulation occurs.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract could more explicitly separate the review of existing advancements from the novel perspective on entanglement manipulation to improve readability for readers unfamiliar with the subfield.
  2. [Overview of advancements] A short table or bullet list summarizing the key cited experimental works (beam energies, materials, observed coherence signatures) would help readers quickly assess the current state of the art referenced in the overview.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and for recognizing the manuscript's synthesis of recent experimental work on electron-beam probes. We agree that a more quantitative discussion of feasibility strengthens the forward-looking perspective on entanglement manipulation and have revised the manuscript to address this.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Perspective on manipulation] The central perspective on using electron beams to manipulate entanglement and correlations (as stated in the abstract and developed in the forward-looking section) rests on the assumption that beam-sample interactions can support coherent, unitary evolution on relevant timescales. No estimates, Fermi-golden-rule calculations, or citations to measured decoherence rates (T2) or damage thresholds under typical microscope beam currents and energies are provided, leaving open whether phonon/plasmon excitation or defect creation would dominate before useful manipulation occurs.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the perspective assumes coherent interactions are possible on relevant timescales and that the original manuscript lacked quantitative support for this. As a forward-looking perspective rather than a detailed theoretical study, the focus was on highlighting potential rather than exhaustive modeling. To address the concern, we have added a paragraph in the forward-looking section providing order-of-magnitude estimates for coherent interaction windows under typical microscope conditions (beam currents ~1-100 pA, energies ~100 keV), citing measured T2 times in semiconductor quantum dots and 2D materials from the literature, and referencing studies on electron-beam-induced damage thresholds and inelastic scattering rates. While we do not include full Fermi-golden-rule calculations for specific protocols (as these are highly system- and geometry-dependent and would require dedicated follow-up work), the added discussion indicates that low-current regimes may allow a window for coherent effects before dominant phonon/plasmon or damage processes. This revision provides a more balanced assessment while preserving the perspective's intent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No derivations or predictions present; perspective paper is self-contained with no circularity.

full rationale

This is a perspective paper providing an overview of recent advancements and forward-looking suggestions on using electron beams to probe and manipulate quantum coherence in semiconductors and 2D materials. The abstract and structure contain no equations, derivations, fitted parameters, predictions of new quantities, or load-bearing claims that reduce to self-citations or inputs by construction. All content is descriptive and referential to external prior work without re-deriving or renaming results internally. No steps qualify as circular under the enumerated patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new mathematical models, free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced; the paper is a non-technical perspective on experimental approaches.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5366 in / 888 out tokens · 29755 ms · 2026-05-12T04:42:23.732539+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Recently , the interaction of free -electrons with optical nanostructures has evolved from a tool for nano -spectroscopy toward a platform for exploring quantum coherence [7-13]

    Introduction and Motivation Over the past decade, remarkable progress has been achieved in resolving excitonic, plasmonic, and polaritonic dynamics in semiconductors and two -dimensional materials with unprecedented spatial resolution using electron beams [1-6]. Recently , the interaction of free -electrons with optical nanostructures has evolved from a t...

    work page

  2. [2]

    In this context, two individual approaches have been pursued

    Electron Beams as Coherent Probes Probing coherent dynamics of quantum systems such as quasi-two-level systems requires a coherent pump, so that its interaction with the quantum system generates a coherent superposition of its individual states, but also probes that enable direct read-out of that coherence . In this context, two individual approaches have...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Toward Quantum Control and Entanglement More ambitiously, the interaction mechanisms could be extended toward two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy, by integrating an EDPHS capable of generating two sequential optical pulses (Fig. 2a). This could be achieved for example by combining Smith -Purcell radiation sources with adaptable mirrors, which reflects...

    work page

  4. [4]

    These advanced characterization techniques open new pathways toward a de eper understanding of quasiparticle interactions and correlations in materials

    Future Directions The growing interest in exploiting electron microscopes for quantum-sensitive measurements offers exciting possibilities—not only for exploring material systems with enhanced sensitivity but also for probing and tailoring quantum correlations in condensed -matter platforms. These advanced characterization techniques open new pathways tow...

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Electron -beam spectroscopy for nanophotonics,

    A. Polman, M. Kociak, and F. J. García de Abajo, "Electron -beam spectroscopy for nanophotonics," Nature Materials, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1158 -1171, 2019/11/01 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41563-019-0409-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41563-019-0409-1 2019

  6. [6]

    Interaction of electron beams with optical nanostructures and metamaterials: from coherent photon sources towards shaping the wave function,

    N. Talebi, "Interaction of electron beams with optical nanostructures and metamaterials: from coherent photon sources towards shaping the wave function," Journal of Optics, vol. 19, no. 10, p. 103001, 2017/09/12 2017, doi: 10.1088/2040-8986/aa8041

    work page doi:10.1088/2040-8986/aa8041 2017

  7. [7]

    Charting the Exciton – Polariton Landscape of WSe2 Thin Flakes by Cathodoluminescence Spectroscopy,

    M. Taleb, F. Davoodi, F. K. Diekmann, K. Rossnagel, and N. Talebi, "Charting the Exciton – Polariton Landscape of WSe2 Thin Flakes by Cathodoluminescence Spectroscopy," Advanced Photonics Research, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 2100124, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/adpr.202100124

    work page doi:10.1002/adpr.202100124 2022

  8. [8]

    Tailoring the Band Structure of Plexcitonic Crystals by Strong Coupling,

    F. Davoodi, M. Taleb, F. K. Diekmann, T. Coenen, K. Rossnagel, and N. Talebi, "Tailoring the Band Structure of Plexcitonic Crystals by Strong Coupling," ACS Photonics, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 2473-2482, 2022/07/20 2022, doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.2c00586

    work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.2c00586 2022

  9. [9]

    Wedge Dyakonov Waves and Dyakonov Plasmons in Topological Insulator Bi2Se3 Probed by Electron Beams,

    N. Talebi, C. Ozsoy -Keskinbora, H. M. Benia, K. Kern, C. T. Koch, and P. A. van Aken, "Wedge Dyakonov Waves and Dyakonov Plasmons in Topological Insulator Bi2Se3 Probed by Electron Beams," ACS Nano, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 6988 -6994, 2016/07/26 2016, doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b02968

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b02968 2016

  10. [10]

    2D Borophene: In -Plane Hyperbolic Polaritons in the Visible Spectral Range,

    Y. Abdi, M. Taleb, M. Black, S. Hajibaba, M. Moayedi, and N. Talebi, "2D Borophene: In -Plane Hyperbolic Polaritons in the Visible Spectral Range," Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 35, no. 39, p. e13016, 2025/09/01 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202513016

    work page doi:10.1002/adfm.202513016 2025

  11. [11]

    Shaping quantum photonic states using free electrons,

    A. Ben Hayun, O. Reinhardt, J. Nemirovsky, A. Karnieli, N. Rivera, and I. Kaminer, "Shaping quantum photonic states using free electrons," Science Advances, vol. 7, no. 11, p. eabe4270, 2021, doi: doi:10.1126/sciadv.abe4270

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abe4270 2021

  12. [12]

    Imprinting the quantum statistics of photons on free electrons,

    R. Dahan et al., "Imprinting the quantum statistics of photons on free electrons," Science, vol. 373, no. 6561, p. eabj7128, 2021, doi: doi:10.1126/science.abj7128

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abj7128 2021

  13. [13]

    Probing electron-photon entanglement using a quantum eraser,

    J.-W. Henke, H. Jeng, and C. Ropers, "Probing electron-photon entanglement using a quantum eraser," Physical Review A, vol. 111, no. 1, p. 012610, 01/09/ 2025, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.111.012610

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.111.012610 2025

  14. [15]

    Phase -locked photon – electron interaction without a laser,

    M. Taleb, M. Hentschel, K. Rossnagel, H. Giessen, and N. Talebi, "Phase -locked photon – electron interaction without a laser," Nature Physics, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 869 -876, 2023/06/01 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41567-023-01954-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-023-01954-3 2023

  15. [16]

    Roadmap for Quantum Nanophotonics with Free Electrons,

    F. J. García de Abajo et al., "Roadmap for Quantum Nanophotonics with Free Electrons," ACS Photonics, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 4760 -4817, 2025/09/17 2025, doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.5c00585. 7

    work page doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.5c00585 2025

  16. [17]

    Ultrafast phonon -mediated dephasing of color centers in hexagonal boron nitride probed by electron beams,

    M. Taleb et al., "Ultrafast phonon -mediated dephasing of color centers in hexagonal boron nitride probed by electron beams," Nature Communications, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 2326, 2025/03/08 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57584-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-57584-1 2025

  17. [18]

    Quantum sensing of electron beams using solid-state spins,

    D. C. Jakob M. Grzesik, Charles Roques-Carmes, Eric I. Rosenthal, Guido L. van de Stolpe, Aviv Karnieli, Giovanni Scuri, Souvik Biswas, Kenneth J. Leedle, Dylan S. Black, Robert L. Byer, Ido Kaminer, R. Joel England, Shanhui Fan, Olav Solgaard, Jelena Vučković, "Quantum sensing of electron beams using solid-state spins," arXiv:2508.13112, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [19]

    Controlling quantum systems with modulated electron beams,

    D. Rätzel, D. Hartley, O. Schwartz, and P. Haslinger, "Controlling quantum systems with modulated electron beams," Physical Review Research, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 023247, 06/28/ 2021, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.023247

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.023247 2021

  19. [20]

    Free-Electron--Bound-Electron Resonant Interaction,

    A. Gover and A. Yariv, "Free-Electron--Bound-Electron Resonant Interaction," Physical Review Letters, vol. 124, no. 6, p. 064801, 02/13/ 2020, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.064801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.064801 2020

  20. [21]

    Ramsey interference in a multilevel quantum system,

    J. P. Lee et al., "Ramsey interference in a multilevel quantum system," Physical Review B, vol. 93, no. 8, p. 085407, 02/04/ 2016, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.085407

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.085407 2016

  21. [22]

    Improving a Solid -State Qubit through an Engineered Mesoscopic Environment,

    G. Éthier-Majcher et al., "Improving a Solid -State Qubit through an Engineered Mesoscopic Environment," Physical Review Letters, vol. 119, no. 13, p. 130503, 09/28/ 2017, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130503

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.130503 2017

  22. [23]

    Reconstruction of non -classical cavity field states with snapshots of their decoherence,

    S. Deléglise et al., "Reconstruction of non -classical cavity field states with snapshots of their decoherence," Nature, vol. 455, no. 7212, pp. 510 -514, 2008/09/01 2008, doi: 10.1038/nature07288

    work page doi:10.1038/nature07288 2008

  23. [24]

    A Molecular Beam Resonance Method with Separated Oscillating Fields,

    N. F. Ramsey, "A Molecular Beam Resonance Method with Separated Oscillating Fields," Physical Review, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 695-699, 06/15/ 1950, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.78.695

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.78.695 1950

  24. [25]

    Electron -driven photon sources for correlative electron -photon spectroscopy with electron microscopes,

    J. Christopher, M. Taleb, A. Maity, M. Hentschel, H. Giessen, and N. Talebi, "Electron -driven photon sources for correlative electron -photon spectroscopy with electron microscopes," Nanophotonics, vol. 9, no. 15, pp. 4381-4406, 2020, doi: doi:10.1515/nanoph-2020-0263

    work page doi:10.1515/nanoph-2020-0263 2020

  25. [26]

    Electron -beam-induced quantum interference effects in a multilevel quantum emitter,

    H. B. Crispin and N. Talebi, "Electron -beam-induced quantum interference effects in a multilevel quantum emitter," Physical Review B, vol. 112, no. 4, p. 045419, 07/17/ 2025, doi: 10.1103/xtgl-vccr

    work page doi:10.1103/xtgl-vccr 2025

  26. [27]

    Probing quantum -coherent dynamics with free electrons,

    H. B. Crispin and N. Talebi, "Probing quantum -coherent dynamics with free electrons," arXiv:2512.24883, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  27. [28]

    In situ electron -beam lithography of deterministic single -quantum-dot mesa-structures using low-temperature cathodoluminescence spectroscopy,

    M. Gschrey et al. , "In situ electron -beam lithography of deterministic single -quantum-dot mesa-structures using low-temperature cathodoluminescence spectroscopy," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 102, no. 25, 2013, doi: 10.1063/1.4812343

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4812343 2013

  28. [29]

    Revealing multiple classes of stable quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride with correlated optical and electron microscopy,

    F. Hayee et al., "Revealing multiple classes of stable quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride with correlated optical and electron microscopy," (in eng), Nat Mater, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 534-539, May 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41563-020-0616-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41563-020-0616-9 2020

  29. [30]

    Photon superbunching in cathodoluminescence of excitons in WS2 monolayer,

    S. Fiedler et al. , "Photon superbunching in cathodoluminescence of excitons in WS2 monolayer," 2D Materials, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 021002, 2023/03/08 2023, doi: 10.1088/2053 - 1583/acbf66

    work page doi:10.1088/2053 2023

  30. [31]

    Cathodoluminescence monitoring of quantum emitter activation in hexagonal boron nitride,

    S. Roux et al., "Cathodoluminescence monitoring of quantum emitter activation in hexagonal boron nitride," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 121, no. 18, 2022, doi: 10.1063/5.0126357

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0126357 2022

  31. [32]

    Visible Light from Localized Surface Charges Moving across a Grating,

    S. J. Smith and E. M. Purcell, "Visible Light from Localized Surface Charges Moving across a Grating," Physical Review, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 1069 -1069, 11/15/ 1953, doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.92.1069

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.92.1069 1953

  32. [33]

    Optical excitations in electron microscopy,

    F. J. García de Abajo, "Optical excitations in electron microscopy," Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 209-275, 02/03/ 2010, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.209

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.209 2010

  33. [34]

    Inelastic ponderomotive scattering of electrons at a high-intensity optical travelling wave in vacuum,

    M. Kozák, T. Eckstein, N. Schönenberger, and P. Hommelhoff, "Inelastic ponderomotive scattering of electrons at a high-intensity optical travelling wave in vacuum," Nature Physics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 121-125, 2018/02/01 2018, doi: 10.1038/nphys4282

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys4282 2018

  34. [35]

    Inelastic electron scattering at a single -beam structured light wave,

    S. Ebel and N. Talebi, "Inelastic electron scattering at a single -beam structured light wave," Communications Physics, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 179, 2023/07/15 2023, doi: 10.1038/s42005 -023- 01300-2. 8

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005 2023

  35. [36]

    Strong Interaction of Slow Electrons with Near -Field Light Visited from First Principles,

    N. Talebi, "Strong Interaction of Slow Electrons with Near -Field Light Visited from First Principles," Physical Review Letters, vol. 125, no. 8, p. 080401, 08/18/ 2020, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.080401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.080401 2020

  36. [37]

    Electrons herald non-classical light,

    G. Arend et al., "Electrons herald non-classical light," Nature Physics, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1855- 1862, 2025/11/01 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41567-025-03033-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-025-03033-1 2025

  37. [38]

    Waveguide quantum electrodynamics: Collective radiance and photon -photon correlations,

    A. S. Sheremet, M. I. Petrov, I. V. Iorsh, A. V. Poshakinskiy, and A. N. Poddubny, "Waveguide quantum electrodynamics: Collective radiance and photon -photon correlations," Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 95, no. 1, p. 015002, 03/10/ 2023, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.95.015002

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.95.015002 2023

  38. [39]

    Phase-matched electron–photon interactions enabled by 3D-printed helical waveguides,

    M. Taleb, M. Samadi, and N. Talebi, "Phase-matched electron–photon interactions enabled by 3D-printed helical waveguides," Nanophotonics, vol. 14, no. 20, pp. 3279 -3286, 2025, doi: doi:10.1515/nanoph-2025-0297

    work page doi:10.1515/nanoph-2025-0297 2025

  39. [40]

    A Multi -Dimensional Cathodoluminescence Detector With 3D Printed Micro-Optics on a Fiber,

    P. H. Bittorf, F. Majstorovic, P. Ruchka, H. Giessen, and N. Talebi, "A Multi -Dimensional Cathodoluminescence Detector With 3D Printed Micro-Optics on a Fiber," Advanced Quantum Technologies, vol. 9, no. 4, p. e00889, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.202500889

    work page doi:10.1002/qute.202500889 2026

  40. [41]

    A hybrid single quantum dot coupled cavity on a CMOS-compatible SiC photonic chip for Purcell-enhanced deterministic single-photon emission,

    Y. Zhu et al., "A hybrid single quantum dot coupled cavity on a CMOS-compatible SiC photonic chip for Purcell-enhanced deterministic single-photon emission," Light: Science & Applications, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 86, 2025/02/14 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41377-024-01676-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41377-024-01676-y 2025

  41. [42]

    Toward Atomic -Resolution Quantum Measurements with Coherently Shaped Free Electrons,

    R. Ruimy, A. Gorlach, C. Mechel, N. Rivera, and I. Kaminer, "Toward Atomic -Resolution Quantum Measurements with Coherently Shaped Free Electrons," Physical Review Letters, vol. 126, no. 23, p. 233403, 06/11/ 2021, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.233403

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.233403 2021

  42. [43]

    Probing the symmetry of the potential of localized surface plasmon resonances with phase -shaped electron beams,

    G. Guzzinati, A. Béché, H. Lourenço -Martins, J. Martin, M. Kociak, and J. Verbeeck, "Probing the symmetry of the potential of localized surface plasmon resonances with phase -shaped electron beams," Nature Communications, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 14999, 2017/04/12 2017, doi: 10.1038/ncomms14999

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms14999 2017

  43. [44]

    Free-electron quantum optics,

    R. Ruimy, A. Karnieli, and I. Kaminer, "Free-electron quantum optics," Nature Physics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 193-200, 2025/02/01 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41567-024-02743-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-024-02743-2 2025

  44. [45]

    Electron-assisted probing of polaritonic light–matter states,

    J. Abad-Arredondo and A. I. Fernández -Domínguez, "Electron-assisted probing of polaritonic light–matter states," Nanophotonics, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 2015 -2027, 2024, doi: doi:10.1515/nanoph-2023-0907

    work page doi:10.1515/nanoph-2023-0907 2015