arxiv: 2605.10619 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Study of η^prime to η ππ Decays in Large-N_C Chiral Perturbation Theory

Feng-Zhi Chen , Xin-Qiang Li , Ya-Dong Yang , Yuan-He Zou

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 04:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph

keywords η' decayschiral perturbation theorylarge Ncfinal-state interactionsDalitz plotunitarizationππ scatteringA2 data

0 comments

The pith

Including unitarized ππ final-state interactions markedly improves large-Nc ChPT descriptions of η′ → η ππ decays.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors compute the decay amplitudes for η′ → η ππ in large-Nc chiral perturbation theory through next-to-next-to-leading order, expanding simultaneously in momenta, quark masses, and 1/Nc. Partial-wave projection followed by unitarization resums the S- and D-wave ππ final-state interactions, after which the low-energy constants are fitted to precise A2 collaboration data. Direct comparison shows that the unitarized amplitudes reproduce the measured distributions far better than the tree-level or non-unitarized versions, yielding the Dalitz-plot parameters a = −0.085(18)stat(4)syst, b = −0.081(10)stat(6)syst, and d = −0.045(6)stat(8)syst. A reader cares because these parameters encode the dynamics of chiral symmetry breaking in the light-meson sector and serve as benchmarks for testing extensions of the Standard Model.

Core claim

Within large-Nc ChPT the η′ → η ππ amplitudes are calculated to NNLO and then unitarized in partial waves to incorporate the dominant S- and D-wave ππ final-state interactions. Fitting the resulting expressions to A2 data produces significantly better agreement once the interactions are included, allowing extraction of the Dalitz parameters a = −0.085(18)stat(4)syst, b = −0.081(10)stat(6)syst, and d = −0.045(6)stat(8)syst as a refined description of the decay.

What carries the argument

Partial-wave projection and unitarization of S- and D-wave amplitudes inside large-Nc ChPT to resum ππ final-state interactions.

If this is right

The extracted Dalitz parameters provide tighter benchmarks for other theoretical calculations of η′ decays.
The framework supplies a controlled way to include final-state interactions in related processes involving η and η′ mesons.
Improved agreement with data constrains the relevant low-energy constants in the large-Nc Lagrangian.
The same unitarization technique can be applied to higher-order calculations of other two-pion final states.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The success of the unitarized description suggests that analogous resummation methods could improve predictions for other decays with strong ππ rescattering, such as η′ → 3π.
If the fitted constants prove stable under further 1/Nc corrections, they could be used as input for lattice-QCD studies of light-meson scattering.
The refined parameters may help interpret possible deviations in future searches for physics beyond the Standard Model in rare η′ channels.

Load-bearing premise

The low-energy constants fitted to the A2 data remain consistent with the large-Nc framework and the chosen unitarization procedure captures the dominant final-state interactions without large uncontrolled errors.

What would settle it

A new high-precision measurement of the Dalitz parameters a, b, and d that lies well outside the quoted statistical-plus-systematic ranges would show that the unitarized large-Nc ChPT description is inadequate.

read the original abstract

We investigate the $\eta^\prime \to \eta \pi\pi$ decays within the framework of large-$N_{C}$ chiral perturbation theory, by calculating the decay amplitudes up to next-to-next-to-leading order in a simultaneous expansion in powers of external momenta, quark masses, and $1/N_C$. Projecting the amplitudes onto partial waves allows us to implement a unitarization procedure to account for the $S$- and $D$-wave $\pi\pi$ final-state interactions. The relevant low-energy constants are determined by fitting our theoretical results to the precise experimental data from the A2 collaboration. A comparison of fits with and without $\pi\pi$ final-state interactions demonstrates that including these effects significantly improves the agreement of our theoretical predictions with the experimental measurements. Consequently, the Dalitz-plot parameters are extracted as $a=-0.085(18)_{\mathrm{stat}}(4)_{\mathrm{syst}}$, $b=-0.081(10)_{\mathrm{stat}}(6)_{\mathrm{syst}}$, and $d=-0.045(6)_{\mathrm{stat}}(8)_{\mathrm{syst}}$. Our results provide therefore a refined theoretical description of the $\eta^\prime \to \eta \pi\pi$ decay dynamics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper does a fresh NNLO large-Nc ChPT amplitude for η'→ηππ, unitarizes the S- and D-wave ππ FSI, fits the LECs to A2 data, and shows better agreement than the non-unitarized version, but the size of residual matching errors is not quantified.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that they push the simultaneous large-Nc and chiral expansion to NNLO for this specific decay, project onto partial waves, apply unitarization to capture the dominant rescattering, and then fit the relevant low-energy constants directly to the latest A2 Dalitz-plot measurements. The fit with FSI included visibly improves the description of the data over the version without it, and they quote Dalitz parameters a = −0.085(18)stat(4)syst, b = −0.081(10)stat(6)syst, d = −0.045(6)stat(8)syst. That is the concrete advance: a new amplitude at this order plus a practical demonstration that final-state interactions matter at the current precision level. The calculation itself looks technically competent within the framework they chose, and the comparison of the two fits is a useful check. The soft spot is that the unitarization is applied after the NNLO projection, so any mismatch in subtraction constants, cutoff scale, or left-hand cuts can shift the effective parameters at the level of the quoted errors. The paper does not appear to vary those choices or estimate the size of the omitted O(p^6, 1/Nc^2) pieces that would enter the loops, which leaves the claimed improvement somewhat dependent on the particular scheme. Because the LECs are fitted to the same data set whose agreement is being tested, the output numbers are best read as a reparameterization rather than an independent prediction. This is a standard limitation in the field, but it should be stated more explicitly. The work is aimed at people who already use large-Nc ChPT for light-meson processes and want an updated treatment of this channel. It is solid enough and technically grounded enough to deserve a serious referee, even if the final error budget needs tightening. I would send it to review.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes the η′ → η ππ decay amplitudes to NNLO in a simultaneous expansion in momenta, quark masses, and 1/N_C within large-N_C chiral perturbation theory. After partial-wave projection, S- and D-wave ππ final-state interactions are incorporated via a unitarization procedure. Low-energy constants are fitted to A2 collaboration Dalitz-plot data; fits with and without FSI are compared, and the parameters a = −0.085(18)stat(4)syst, b = −0.081(10)stat(6)syst, d = −0.045(6)stat(8)syst are extracted from the improved fit.

Significance. If the unitarization is shown to be free of scheme-dependent artifacts larger than the quoted uncertainties, the work supplies a systematic large-N_C framework that quantifies the importance of ππ rescattering in this decay and yields phenomenologically useful Dalitz parameters. The simultaneous p, m_q, 1/N_C counting and the explicit with/without-FSI comparison are methodological strengths.

major comments (2)

[unitarization and partial-wave projection sections] The unitarization is performed after projecting the NNLO amplitude, yet the manuscript provides no explicit information on the subtraction constants, cutoff scale, or left-hand-cut treatment, nor does it quantify the size of omitted O(p^6, 1/N_C^2) contributions. These choices can shift the extracted Dalitz parameters at the level of the reported statistical and systematic errors (a ≈ −0.085, b ≈ −0.081), so the claimed improvement from FSI cannot be assessed without a dedicated error budget for the matching procedure.
[fit to A2 data and extraction of Dalitz parameters] The low-energy constants are determined by a direct fit to the same A2 Dalitz-plot data whose agreement is being asserted. While the with/without-FSI comparison tests the necessity of rescattering, the output parameters a, b, d are reparameterizations of the fit rather than independent predictions; the paper must therefore report the number of fitted constants, the χ²/dof for both fits, and the statistical significance of the improvement to substantiate the central claim.

minor comments (2)

[abstract] The abstract states that FSI inclusion improves the fit but does not specify the unitarization method (e.g., dispersion relation, K-matrix, or N/D) or the number of free parameters; a one-sentence clarification would aid readers.
[results and error analysis] Systematic uncertainties on the Dalitz parameters are quoted but their sources (higher-order chiral terms, 1/N_C corrections, experimental normalization, etc.) are not itemized; a short table or paragraph would improve transparency.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We have carefully addressed each major point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarifications and additional information, thereby strengthening the presentation of our results on the unitarization procedure and the fit analysis.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The unitarization is performed after projecting the NNLO amplitude, yet the manuscript provides no explicit information on the subtraction constants, cutoff scale, or left-hand-cut treatment, nor does it quantify the size of omitted O(p^6, 1/N_C^2) contributions. These choices can shift the extracted Dalitz parameters at the level of the reported statistical and systematic errors (a ≈ −0.085, b ≈ −0.081), so the claimed improvement from FSI cannot be assessed without a dedicated error budget for the matching procedure.

Authors: We agree that additional explicit details are required to allow a full assessment of the unitarization procedure and its uncertainties. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection (or appendix) specifying the subtraction constants, the numerical value of the cutoff scale, and the precise treatment of left-hand cuts employed in the partial-wave projection and unitarization. To address the size of omitted higher-order contributions, we will include a dedicated error budget obtained by varying the matching scale within a reasonable range and by estimating the impact of O(p^6, 1/N_C^2) terms through a conservative variation of the fitted low-energy constants; the resulting shifts in the Dalitz parameters will be quoted as an additional systematic uncertainty. These additions will enable readers to judge whether the improvement from FSI remains significant within the enlarged error budget. revision: yes
Referee: The low-energy constants are determined by a direct fit to the same A2 Dalitz-plot data whose agreement is being asserted. While the with/without-FSI comparison tests the necessity of rescattering, the output parameters a, b, d are reparameterizations of the fit rather than independent predictions; the paper must therefore report the number of fitted constants, the χ²/dof for both fits, and the statistical significance of the improvement to substantiate the central claim.

Authors: We concur that transparency on the fit procedure is essential. The revised manuscript will explicitly state the number of low-energy constants that are fitted to the A2 data, report the χ² per degree of freedom for the fits performed both with and without final-state interactions, and quantify the statistical significance of the improvement (via Δχ² and the associated p-value or an F-test). These quantities will be presented in a new table or subsection, thereby demonstrating that the inclusion of ππ rescattering yields a statistically meaningful better description of the data while making clear that a, b, and d are extracted fit parameters. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Dalitz parameters extracted by fitting LECs to A2 data, so 'predictions' and fit improvement reduce to reparameterization of input

specific steps

fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
"The relevant low-energy constants are determined by fitting our theoretical results to the precise experimental data from the A2 collaboration. A comparison of fits with and without ππ final-state interactions demonstrates that including these effects significantly improves the agreement of our theoretical predictions with the experimental measurements. Consequently, the Dalitz-plot parameters are extracted as a=-0.085(18)stat(4)syst, b=-0.081(10)stat(6)syst, and d=-0.045(6)stat(8)syst."

Dalitz parameters a, b, d are obtained by fitting LECs to the A2 dataset; the quoted values and the claimed improvement from including FSI are therefore outputs of the fit to the same data whose agreement is being asserted, reducing the 'predictions' to a reparameterization of the input measurements.

full rationale

The paper computes the NNLO large-Nc ChPT amplitude, projects to partial waves, applies unitarization for ππ FSI, then fits the relevant LECs to A2 data and extracts the Dalitz parameters a, b, d from that fit. The central claim (improved agreement when FSI included, plus the quoted parameter values) is obtained by direct comparison of two fits to the identical dataset. This is a fitted_input_called_prediction pattern: the output quantities are not independent first-principles results but are determined by the same data used to tune the LECs. The underlying chiral amplitude and unitarization procedure retain independent content, so the circularity is partial rather than total (hence score 6, not 8-10). No self-citation load-bearing or ansatz smuggling is evident in the provided text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard large-Nc chiral expansion, the validity of the chosen unitarization scheme for ππ scattering, and the assumption that a finite set of low-energy constants can be determined from the present data set.

free parameters (1)

low-energy constants of large-Nc ChPT
Determined by fitting the theoretical amplitudes to A2 collaboration data on the decay.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The large-Nc expansion combined with the chiral expansion up to NNLO is a controlled approximation for this decay process.
Invoked when the amplitudes are computed in the simultaneous expansion in momenta, quark masses, and 1/Nc.
domain assumption The unitarization procedure applied to S- and D-wave ππ partial waves accurately resums the final-state interactions.
Used to modify the tree-level amplitudes before comparison with data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5539 in / 1618 out tokens · 45905 ms · 2026-05-12T04:22:21.222607+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The relevant low-energy constants are determined by fitting our theoretical results to the precise experimental data from the A2 collaboration... L13=1.89(9)×10⁻³, L21=1.40(70)×10⁻³, v(2)1=−0.11(2), aππ=−0.62+0.37−0.26
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

simultaneous expansion in powers of external momenta, quark masses, and 1/Nc... NNLO Lagrangian with many Ci, Li, v(2)i operators

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

Weinberg,Phenomenological Lagrangians,Physica A96(1979) 327

S. Weinberg,Phenomenological Lagrangians,Physica A96(1979) 327

work page 1979
[2]

Gasser and H

J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler,Quark Masses,Phys. Rept.87(1982) 77

work page 1982
[3]

Gasser and H

J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler,Chiral Perturbation Theory: Expansions in the Mass of the Strange Quark,Nucl. Phys. B250(1985) 465

work page 1985
[4]

Gasser and H

J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler,Chiral Perturbation Theory to One Loop,Annals Phys.158 (1984) 142

work page 1984
[5]

Chiral Perturbation Theory

A. Pich,Chiral perturbation theory,Rept. Prog. Phys.58(1995) 563 [hep-ph/9502366]

work page Pith review arXiv 1995
[6]

Chiral perturbation theory

G. Ecker,Chiral perturbation theory,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.35(1995) 1 [hep-ph/9501357]

work page Pith review arXiv 1995
[7]

Introduction to Chiral Perturbation Theory

S. Scherer,Introduction to chiral perturbation theory,Adv. Nucl. Phys.27(2003) 277 [hep-ph/0210398]

work page Pith review arXiv 2003
[8]

Bernard and U.-G

V. Bernard and U.-G. Meissner,Chiral perturbation theory,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.57 (2007) 33 [hep-ph/0611231]

work page arXiv 2007
[9]

Kaiser and H

R. Kaiser and H. Leutwyler,LargeN c in chiral perturbation theory,Eur. Phys. J. C17 (2000) 623 [hep-ph/0007101]

work page arXiv 2000
[10]

Escribano, P

R. Escribano, P. Masjuan and J.J. Sanz-Cillero,Chiral dynamics predictions forη ′→ηππ, JHEP05(2011) 094 [1011.5884]

work page arXiv 2011
[11]

Gonz` alez-Sol´ ıs and E

S. Gonz` alez-Sol´ ıs and E. Passemar,η′→ηππdecays in unitarized resonance chiral theory, Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 758 [1807.04313]

work page arXiv 2018
[12]

Beisert and B

N. Beisert and B. Borasoy,Theη′→ηππdecay inU(3)chiral perturbation theory,Nucl. Phys. A705(2002) 433 [hep-ph/0201289]

work page arXiv 2002
[13]

Borasoy and R

B. Borasoy and R. Nissler,Hadronicηandη′decays,Eur. Phys. J. A26(2005) 383 [hep-ph/0510384]

work page arXiv 2005
[14]

Borasoy, U.-G

B. Borasoy, U.-G. Meissner and R. Nissler,On the extraction of the quark mass ratio (md−mu)/ms fromΓ(η′→π0π+π−)/Γ(η′→ηπ+π−),Phys. Lett. B643(2006) 41 [hep-ph/0609010]

work page arXiv 2006
[15]

Kubis and S.P

B. Kubis and S.P. Schneider,The Cusp effect inη ′→ηππdecays,Eur. Phys. J. C62(2009) 511 [0904.1320]. – 30 –

work page arXiv 2009
[16]

Isken, B

T. Isken, B. Kubis, S.P. Schneider and P. Stoffer,Dispersion relations forη ′→ηππ,Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 489 [1705.04339]

work page arXiv 2017
[17]

Akdag, T

H. Akdag, T. Isken and B. Kubis,Patterns of C- and CP-violation in hadronicηandη ′ three-body decays,JHEP02(2022) 137 [2111.02417]

work page arXiv 2022
[18]

Fariborz and J

A.H. Fariborz and J. Schechter,η′→ηππdecay as a probe of a possible lowest lying scalar nonet,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 034002 [hep-ph/9902238]

work page arXiv 1999
[19]

Singh and J

C.A. Singh and J. Pasupathy,On the Decay Modes of the Mesonη ′(958)and Chiral Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. Lett.35(1975) 1193

work page 1975
[20]

Herrera-Siklody,ηandη′hadronic decays inU L(3)⊗UR(3)chiral perturbation theory, hep-ph/9902446

P. Herrera-Siklody,ηandη′hadronic decays inU L(3)⊗UR(3)chiral perturbation theory, hep-ph/9902446

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[21]

Guo, Z.-H

X.-K. Guo, Z.-H. Guo, J.A. Oller and J.J. Sanz-Cillero,Scrutinizing theη-η′mixing, masses and pseudoscalar decay constants in the framework of U(3) chiral effective field theory,JHEP 06(2015) 175 [1503.02248]

work page arXiv 2015
[22]

Bickert, P

P. Bickert, P. Masjuan and S. Scherer,η-η′Mixing in Large-Nc Chiral Perturbation Theory, Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 054023 [1612.05473]

work page arXiv 2017
[23]

Mixing and Decay Constants of Pseudoscalar Mesons

T. Feldmann, P. Kroll and B. Stech,Mixing and decay constants of pseudoscalar mesons, Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 114006 [hep-ph/9802409]

work page Pith review arXiv 1998
[24]

Guevara, F.-K

A. Guevara, F.-K. Guo and H.-J. Jing,Novel method for determining the light quark mass ratio usingη′→ηππdecays,2502.02837

work page arXiv
[25]

Dorofeev et al.,Study ofη ′→ηπ+π−Dalitz plot,Phys

V. Dorofeev et al.,Study ofη ′→ηπ+π−Dalitz plot,Phys. Lett. B651(2007) 22 [hep-ph/0607044]. [26]BESIIIcollaboration,Measurement of the Matrix Element for the Decayη ′→ηπ+π−,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 012003 [1012.1117]. [27]BESIIIcollaboration,Measurement of the matrix elements for the decaysη ′→ηπ+π−and η′→ηπ0π0,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 012003 [1709.04627]

work page arXiv 2007
[26]

Blik et al.,Measurement of the matrix element for the decayη ′→ηπ0π0 with the GAMS-4πspectrometer,Phys

A.M. Blik et al.,Measurement of the matrix element for the decayη ′→ηπ0π0 with the GAMS-4πspectrometer,Phys. Atom. Nucl.72(2009) 231

work page 2009
[27]

Adlarson et al.,Measurement of the decayη′→π0π0ηat MAMI,Phys

P. Adlarson et al.,Measurement of the decayη′→π0π0ηat MAMI,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 012001 [1709.04230]. [30]BESIIIcollaboration,Evidence for the Cusp Effect inη ′Decays intoηπ0π0,Phys. Rev. Lett. 130(2023) 081901 [2207.01004]. [31]CLAScollaboration,The CEBAF Large Acceptance Spectrometer (CLAS),Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A503(2003) 513. [32]GlueXcollaboration,The ...

work page arXiv 2018
[28]

Physics Opportunities with the 12 GeV Upgrade at Jefferson Lab

J. Dudek et al.,Physics Opportunities with the 12 GeV Upgrade at Jefferson Lab,Eur. Phys. J. A48(2012) 187 [1208.1244]

work page Pith review arXiv 2012
[29]

L. Gan, B. Kubis, E. Passemar and S. Tulin,Precision tests of fundamental physics withη andη′mesons,Phys. Rept.945(2022) 1 [2007.00664]

work page arXiv 2022
[30]

Chen et al.,Plan for a superηfactory at Huizhou accelerator complex,Nucl

X. Chen et al.,Plan for a superηfactory at Huizhou accelerator complex,Nucl. Sci. Tech. 36(2025) 137 [2407.00874]. – 31 –

work page arXiv 2025
[31]

Achasovet al., Front

M. Achasov et al.,STCF conceptual design report (Volume 1): Physics&detector,Front. Phys. (Beijing)19(2024) 14701 [2303.15790]. [37]Charm-Tau F actorycollaboration,Project of a Super Charm-Tau factory at the Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics in Novosibirsk,Phys. Atom. Nucl.76(2013) 1072

work page arXiv 2024
[32]

S.-s. Fang, B. Kubis and A. Kupsc,What can we learn about light-meson interactions at electron–positron colliders?,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.120(2021) 103884 [2102.05922]

work page arXiv 2021
[33]

Oller and E

J.A. Oller and E. Oset,N/D description of two meson amplitudes and chiral symmetry, Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 074023 [hep-ph/9809337]

work page arXiv 1999
[34]

Pallante and A

E. Pallante and A. Pich,Strong enhancement ofϵ′/ϵthrough final state interactions,Phys. Rev. Lett.84(2000) 2568 [hep-ph/9911233]

work page arXiv 2000
[35]

E. Oset, S. Hirenzaki, E. Marco, J.A. Oller, J.R. Pelaez and H. Toki,Theϕ→π+π−andϕ radiative decays within a chiral unitary approach,Frascati Phys. Ser.16(1999) 581 [hep-ph/0002189]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1999
[36]

Nieves and E

J. Nieves and E. Ruiz Arriola,Bethe-Salpeter approach for unitarized chiral perturbation theory,Nucl. Phys. A679(2000) 57 [hep-ph/9907469]

work page arXiv 2000
[37]

Oller and U.G

J.A. Oller and U.G. Meissner,Chiral dynamics in the presence of bound states: Kaon nucleon interactions revisited,Phys. Lett. B500(2001) 263 [hep-ph/0011146]

work page arXiv 2001
[38]

Jamin, J.A

M. Jamin, J.A. Oller and A. Pich,S-waveKπscattering in chiral perturbation theory with resonances,Nucl. Phys. B587(2000) 331 [hep-ph/0006045]

work page arXiv 2000
[39]

Chiral Unitary approach to meson-meson and meson-baryon interactions and nuclear applications

J.A. Oller, E. Oset and A. Ramos,Chiral unitary approach to meson meson and meson - baryon interactions and nuclear applications,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.45(2000) 157 [hep-ph/0002193]

work page Pith review arXiv 2000
[40]

Guo and J.A

Z.-H. Guo and J.A. Oller,Resonances from meson-meson scattering inU(3)χPT,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 034005 [1104.2849]

work page arXiv 2011
[41]

Chew and S

G.F. Chew and S. Mandelstam,Theory of low-energy pion pion interactions,Phys. Rev.119 (1960) 467

work page 1960
[42]

Witten,Current Algebra Theorems for the U(1) Goldstone Boson,Nucl

E. Witten,Current Algebra Theorems for the U(1) Goldstone Boson,Nucl. Phys. B156 (1979) 269

work page 1979
[43]

Veneziano,U(1) Without Instantons,Nucl

G. Veneziano,U(1) Without Instantons,Nucl. Phys. B159(1979) 213

work page 1979
[44]

Leutwyler,Bounds on the light quark masses,Phys

H. Leutwyler,Bounds on the light quark masses,Phys. Lett. B374(1996) 163 [hep-ph/9601234]

work page arXiv 1996
[45]

The anomalous chiral Lagrangian of order $p^6$

J. Bijnens, L. Girlanda and P. Talavera,The Anomalous chiral Lagrangian of orderp 6,Eur. Phys. J. C23(2002) 539 [hep-ph/0110400]

work page Pith review arXiv 2002
[46]

Ebertshauser, H.W

T. Ebertshauser, H.W. Fearing and S. Scherer,The Anomalous chiral perturbation theory meson Lagrangian to orderp 6 revisited,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 054033 [hep-ph/0110261]

work page arXiv 2002
[47]

Bijnens, G

J. Bijnens, G. Colangelo and G. Ecker,The Mesonic chiral Lagrangian of orderp 6,JHEP02 (1999) 020 [hep-ph/9902437]

work page arXiv 1999
[48]

Herrera-Siklody, J.I

P. Herrera-Siklody, J.I. Latorre, P. Pascual and J. Taron,Chiral effective Lagrangian in the large-Nc limit: The Nonet case,Nucl. Phys. B497(1997) 345 [hep-ph/9610549]. [55]Particle Data Groupcollaboration,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001. – 32 – [56]KLOEcollaboration,Measurement of the pseudoscalar mixing angle andη ′gluonium conte...

work page arXiv 1997
[49]

Cronin,Phenomenological model of strong and weak interactions in chiralU(3)×U(3), Phys

J.A. Cronin,Phenomenological model of strong and weak interactions in chiralU(3)×U(3), Phys. Rev.161(1967) 1483

work page 1967
[50]

Schwinger,Chiral Transformations,Phys

J. Schwinger,Chiral Transformations,Phys. Rev.167(1968) 1432

work page 1968
[51]

Schechter and Y

J. Schechter and Y. Ueda,General treatment of the breaking of chiral symmetry and scale invariance in theSU(3)σmodel,Phys. Rev. D3(1971) 2874

work page 1971
[52]

Weisz, Riazuddin and S

P. Weisz, Riazuddin and S. Oneda,Chiral and dilational symmetry breaking and the η′→ηππdecay rate,Phys. Rev. D5(1972) 2264

work page 1972
[53]

Di Vecchia, F

P. Di Vecchia, F. Nicodemi, R. Pettorino and G. Veneziano,LargeN, Chiral Approach to Pseudoscalar Masses, Mixings and Decays,Nucl. Phys. B181(1981) 318

work page 1981
[54]

Fajfer and J.M

S. Fajfer and J.M. Gerard,Hadronic Decays ofηandη′in the LargeNLimit,Z. Phys. C42 (1989) 431

work page 1989
[55]

Akhoury and M

R. Akhoury and M. Leurer,Low-energy Effective Lagrangian Description ofηandη ′Decays, Z. Phys. C43(1989) 145

work page 1989
[56]

Bijnens and G

J. Bijnens and G. Ecker,Mesonic low-energy constants,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.64(2014) 149 [1405.6488]

work page arXiv 2014
[57]

Pan, D.-K

H.-X. Pan, D.-K. Kong, Q.-Y. Wen and S.-Z. Jiang,Bayesian method for fitting the low-energy constants in chiral perturbation theory,Front. Phys. (Beijing)19(2024) 64203 [2311.10423]

work page arXiv 2024
[58]

Etkin et al.,Amplitude Analysis of theK 0 SK 0 S System Produced in the Reaction π−p→K0 SK 0 Snat23GeV/c,Phys

A. Etkin et al.,Amplitude Analysis of theK 0 SK 0 S System Produced in the Reaction π−p→K0 SK 0 Snat23GeV/c,Phys. Rev. D25(1982) 1786

work page 1982
[59]

Watson,Some general relations between the photoproduction and scattering ofπ mesons,Phys

K.M. Watson,Some general relations between the photoproduction and scattering ofπ mesons,Phys. Rev.95(1954) 228

work page 1954
[60]

The pion-pion scattering amplitude. IV: Improved analysis with once subtracted Roy-like equations up to 1100 MeV

R. Garcia-Martin, R. Kaminski, J.R. Pelaez, J. Ruiz de Elvira and F.J. Yndurain,The Pion-pion scattering amplitude. IV: Improved analysis with once subtracted Roy-like equations up to 1100 MeV,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 074004 [1102.2183]

work page Pith review arXiv 2011
[61]

Roy,Exact integral equation for pion pion scattering involving only physical region partial waves,Phys

S.M. Roy,Exact integral equation for pion pion scattering involving only physical region partial waves,Phys. Lett. B36(1971) 353. – 33 –

work page 1971