arxiv: 2605.10964 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · 💻 cs.GT

Recognition: no theorem link

Mechanism Design for Quality-Preserving LLM Advertising

Jiale Han , Xiaowu Dai

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 01:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.GT

keywords LLM advertisingmechanism designquality preservationRAGauction mechanismsincentive compatibilitysemantic similaritysocial welfare

0 comments

The pith

Quality-preserving auctions for LLM ads use RAG references to set endogenous reserves that screen out low-value insertions while maintaining content fidelity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops auction mechanisms for embedding advertisements into LLM outputs that explicitly balance revenue generation against risks of content distortion. It treats retrieval-augmented generation outputs as a no-ad reference to compute marginal social welfare contributions and derives endogenous reserve prices that exclude ads failing a positive-contribution threshold. Two concrete designs follow: a KL-regularized single-allocation mechanism paired with Myerson payments, and a screened Vickrey-Clarke-Groves mechanism for multi-allocation; both are shown to satisfy dominant-strategy incentive compatibility and individual rationality. Experiments across scenarios report higher revenue per ad and greater semantic similarity to clean responses than existing baselines. The work therefore addresses the practical problem of monetizing generative AI without eroding user trust in output accuracy.

Core claim

Built on retrieval-augmented generation, the framework treats organic content as reference and derives an endogenous reserve price that screens out ads with non-positive marginal social welfare contributions. The authors introduce a KL-regularized single-allocation mechanism with Myerson payments together with a screened VCG multi-allocation mechanism; both satisfy dominant-strategy incentive compatibility and individual rationality. Experiments demonstrate outperformance over baselines on revenue per ad and semantic similarity to no-ad responses, establishing a route to monetization that does not compromise output quality.

What carries the argument

The KL-regularized single-allocation mechanism with Myerson payments and the screened VCG multi-allocation mechanism, which integrate semantic similarity to a RAG reference into allocation and payment rules to enforce positive marginal social welfare.

If this is right

Both mechanisms guarantee dominant-strategy incentive compatibility and individual rationality for advertisers.
Revenue per ad increases while semantic similarity to clean responses is preserved at higher levels than prior methods.
Endogenous reserves derived from marginal welfare automatically exclude low-value or distorting ads.
The design applies to both single-ad and multi-ad insertion settings without violating incentive properties.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same reserve-screening logic could be tested in non-LLM generative settings such as image or video synthesis platforms where reference outputs are also available.
Replacing the fixed RAG reference with live user feedback signals might allow dynamic reserve adjustment beyond the static semantic metric used here.
Hybrid allocation rules that switch between single and multi mechanisms based on query context could further improve welfare without new incentive constraints.

Load-bearing premise

Semantic similarity to a RAG-generated no-ad reference accurately captures user-perceived content quality and marginal social welfare contributions can be computed endogenously without introducing new distortions.

What would settle it

A controlled user study in which participants rate perceived quality and relevance of ad-augmented LLM responses and the similarity-based mechanisms show no statistically significant quality advantage over baselines despite higher automated similarity scores.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.10964 by Jiale Han, Xiaowu Dai.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Output quality measured by semantic similarity to the no-ad response, averaged over 100 trials; error bars show ± SE. Left: per-segment similarity across the three generation rounds. Right: cumulative similarity over the first k sentences. QP single-allocation (Section 3.2) QP multi-allocation (Section 3.3) Seg single-allocation (See [15]) (Seg 1) Explore Hawaii’s spectacular volcanoes, lush rainforests, … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Sample outputs of different mechanisms. Teal: useful answer information. Blue: ads link. Red: incoherent or forced ad insertion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Output quality measured by semantic similarity to the no-ad response for Scenario 2. Left: per-segment similarity across the three generation rounds. Right: cumulative similarity over the first k sentences. 33 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Sample outputs of different mechanisms for Scenario 2. Teal: useful answer information. Blue: ads link. Red: incoherent or forced ad insertion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Output quality measured by semantic similarity to the no-ad response for Scenario 3. Left: per-segment similarity across the three generation rounds. Right: cumulative similarity over the first k sentences. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Sample outputs of different mechanisms for Scenario 3. Teal: useful answer information. Blue: ads link. Red: incoherent or forced ad insertion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Output quality measured by semantic similarity to the no-ad response for Scenario 4. Left: per-segment similarity across the three generation rounds. Right: cumulative similarity over the first k sentences. 38 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_7.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Embedding advertisements into large language model (LLM) outputs introduces a fundamental tension: revenue optimization can distort content and degrade user experience. Existing approaches largely ignore this trade-off, often forcing irrelevant ads into responses. We propose a quality-preserving auction framework that explicitly integrates content fidelity into the mechanism design. Built on retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), our approach treats organic content as a reference and derives an endogenous reserve price that screens out ads with non-positive marginal social welfare contributions. We develop a KL-regularized single-allocation mechanism with Myerson payments and a screened VCG multi-allocation mechanism, both satisfying dominant-strategy incentive compatibility and individual rationality. Experiments across diverse scenarios demonstrate that our mechanisms outperform existing baselines in metrics such as revenue per ad and semantic similarity to no-ad responses. Our results establish a new paradigm for LLM advertising that enables monetization without compromising output quality.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper puts RAG-derived semantic similarity at the center of both ad screening and welfare calculation for LLM auctions, which is a direct way to handle the quality tradeoff but risks making the reported gains circular.

read the letter

The core move is to treat a RAG-generated no-ad response as the quality reference and screen ads whose marginal social welfare contribution, measured by embedding similarity, is non-positive. From there the authors build a KL-regularized single-allocation rule with Myerson payments and a screened multi-allocation VCG rule, both asserted to remain DSIC and IR. Experiments are said to improve revenue per ad and similarity to the no-ad baseline over prior approaches. That combination of endogenous reserves with these regularized mechanisms is not in the earlier ad-auction literature they cite, so the application itself is new. The idea is timely because LLM interfaces are already monetizing and the tension between revenue and output fidelity is real. The constructions look like straightforward extensions once the quality constraint is accepted, and the claim that they preserve incentive properties is at least plausible on the surface. The experiments are described only at the level of outperforming baselines, with no error bars or controls mentioned in the abstract. The bigger issue is that the same similarity function is used both to set the reserve and to score the final output. If that metric does not track what users actually experience as quality, the screening step can either let in distorting ads or reject useful ones, and the performance numbers become self-referential. There is also no indication in the provided material that the similarity function satisfies the monotonicity or submodularity conditions needed for the screened VCG payments to stay dominant-strategy incentive compatible. The abstract gives no derivation details on how marginal welfare is computed without feeding back into the allocation rule itself. This work is aimed at mechanism-design researchers who want to add content constraints to generative-AI platforms and at ad-tech groups building LLM products. It is worth sending to referees because the problem is important and the proposed mechanisms are concrete enough to check, even if the current evidence is thin and the quality metric needs independent validation. A serious review would focus on the proofs for incentive compatibility after screening and on whether any human correlation data exists for the similarity scores.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to introduce a quality-preserving auction framework for embedding ads in LLM outputs via RAG. It derives an endogenous reserve price from marginal social welfare (using semantic similarity between ad-augmented and no-ad RAG responses) to screen ads, then proposes a KL-regularized single-allocation mechanism with Myerson payments and a screened VCG multi-allocation mechanism. Both are asserted to satisfy DSIC and IR, with experiments showing gains over baselines in revenue per ad and semantic similarity to no-ad responses.

Significance. If the similarity metric is shown to track user-perceived quality and the mechanisms remain incentive-compatible after screening, the work would address a timely tension between monetization and output fidelity in generative AI systems. The explicit integration of content fidelity into mechanism design and the dual single/multi-allocation proposals are constructive contributions, though the absence of independent validation or falsifiable predictions limits immediate impact.

major comments (3)

[Abstract and mechanism design] Abstract and mechanism design sections: The endogenous reserve price is computed from the same RAG-generated no-ad reference used both to define quality and to evaluate experimental outcomes. This creates a circularity in which the screening rule and the reported welfare/quality metric are interdependent; no separate validation (e.g., human correlation study) is provided to confirm that cosine/embedding similarity tracks actual user utility or content fidelity.
[Screened VCG mechanism] Screened VCG mechanism description: No derivation is supplied showing that the semantic-similarity welfare function is monotone (or submodular) in the sense required for the post-screening VCG payments to remain dominant-strategy incentive compatible. The abstract asserts DSIC without exhibiting the requisite monotonicity argument or counter-example check.
[Experiments] Experimental evaluation: The abstract states that the mechanisms outperform baselines on revenue per ad and semantic similarity, yet provides no description of experimental controls, statistical tests, error bars, or whether the KL-regularization strength and marginal-welfare threshold were tuned on the same test distribution used for reporting. This undermines the claim that quality is preserved without distortion.

minor comments (2)

[Mechanism definitions] Notation for the KL-regularization term and the marginal social welfare threshold should be introduced with explicit definitions and ranges before being used in the mechanism statements.
[Abstract] The abstract refers to 'diverse scenarios' without specifying the query domains, LLM backbones, or RAG corpus sizes; adding these details would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. These points help clarify the presentation of our quality-preserving auction framework. We address each major comment below, with indications of how the manuscript will be revised.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Abstract and mechanism design sections: The endogenous reserve price is computed from the same RAG-generated no-ad reference used both to define quality and to evaluate experimental outcomes. This creates a circularity in which the screening rule and the reported welfare/quality metric are interdependent; no separate validation (e.g., human correlation study) is provided to confirm that cosine/embedding similarity tracks actual user utility or content fidelity.

Authors: We acknowledge the interdependence between the screening rule and the evaluation metric, both of which rely on the no-ad RAG response as reference. This choice is deliberate: the no-ad response provides the natural baseline for computing marginal social welfare as the change in semantic similarity induced by ad insertion, ensuring the mechanism directly optimizes for fidelity relative to the organic case. While a human correlation study would offer stronger external validation that embedding similarity aligns with user-perceived quality, the current work centers on mechanism design rather than metric validation. In the revision we will add a dedicated paragraph in the mechanism design section explaining the rationale for this reference-based approach, its alignment with standard RAG evaluation practices, and an explicit statement that the absence of human studies constitutes a limitation for future investigation. revision: partial
Referee: Screened VCG mechanism description: No derivation is supplied showing that the semantic-similarity welfare function is monotone (or submodular) in the sense required for the post-screening VCG payments to remain dominant-strategy incentive compatible. The abstract asserts DSIC without exhibiting the requisite monotonicity argument or counter-example check.

Authors: The referee correctly identifies that a monotonicity argument is required to guarantee DSIC after screening. The welfare function is defined as the expected semantic similarity contribution of an ad-augmented response. In the revised manuscript we will supply a formal proof (placed in the main text or appendix) establishing that this welfare function is monotone non-decreasing in reported valuations: for any fixed bids of other advertisers, raising one's own bid weakly increases the probability of clearing the endogenous reserve and thus the allocation probability, satisfying the monotonicity condition needed for the screened VCG payments to remain dominant-strategy incentive compatible. We will also include a short verification that no counter-examples arise under the screening rule. revision: yes
Referee: Experimental evaluation: The abstract states that the mechanisms outperform baselines on revenue per ad and semantic similarity, yet provides no description of experimental controls, statistical tests, error bars, or whether the KL-regularization strength and marginal-welfare threshold were tuned on the same test distribution used for reporting. This undermines the claim that quality is preserved without distortion.

Authors: We agree that additional experimental details are necessary for reproducibility and to support the quality-preservation claims. In the revised Experiments section we will provide: (i) explicit descriptions of all controls and baseline implementations, (ii) the statistical tests employed (including paired t-tests with p-values), (iii) error bars or standard deviations for all reported metrics across runs, and (iv) confirmation that the KL-regularization coefficient and marginal-welfare threshold were tuned exclusively on a held-out validation split, with final results reported on a disjoint test distribution. These additions will directly address concerns about potential overfitting or lack of controls. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The abstract describes a RAG-based endogenous reserve derived from marginal social welfare contributions, KL-regularized Myerson and screened VCG mechanisms claimed to satisfy DSIC/IR, and experimental outperformance on revenue and semantic similarity metrics. No equations or self-citations are provided in the given text that reduce the central claims (quality preservation via screening, incentive properties) to tautological redefinitions or fitted inputs by construction. The welfare and similarity metrics may overlap conceptually, but without explicit paper equations showing the screening rule forces the reported similarity gains or that the uniqueness/DSIC properties are imported solely from author priors, the mechanism design steps remain independent and self-contained. This is the expected honest non-finding for most papers.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard auction-theory axioms plus domain assumptions about RAG similarity as a faithful proxy for quality; no explicit free parameters or invented entities are named in the abstract, but the endogenous reserve calculation implicitly introduces fitted thresholds.

free parameters (2)

KL regularization strength
Controls the trade-off between revenue and fidelity in the single-allocation mechanism; value not stated in abstract.
marginal social welfare threshold
Used to screen ads; derived endogenously but requires a concrete cutoff that must be chosen or fitted.

axioms (2)

domain assumption RAG-generated no-ad response is an unbiased reference for content fidelity
Invoked when defining marginal social welfare and semantic similarity metrics.
standard math Advertiser valuations are independent and can be elicited truthfully under the proposed payment rules
Standard DSIC assumption from Myerson and VCG theory.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5440 in / 1451 out tokens · 41427 ms · 2026-05-13T01:09:36.571738+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

[1]

GPT-4 Technical Report

Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Floren- cia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al. Gpt-4 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774, 2023

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[2]

Courier Corporation, 2006

János Aczél and Hansjorg Oser.Lectures on functional equations and their applications. Courier Corporation, 2006

work page 2006
[3]

Position auctions in ai-generated content

Santiago Balseiro, Kshipra Bhawalkar, Yuan Deng, Zhe Feng, Jieming Mao, Aranyak Mehta, Vahab Mirrokni, Renato Paes Leme, Di Wang, and Song Zuo. Position auctions in ai-generated content. InProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2026, pages 261–272, 2026

work page 2026
[4]

Language models are few-shot learners.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:1877–1901, 2020

Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. Language models are few-shot learners.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:1877–1901, 2020

work page 1901
[5]

Regret minimization for reserve prices in second-price auctions.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 61 (1):549–564, 2014

Nicolo Cesa-Bianchi, Claudio Gentile, and Yishay Mansour. Regret minimization for reserve prices in second-price auctions.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 61 (1):549–564, 2014

work page 2014
[6]

Mechanism design for data science

Shuchi Chawla, Jason Hartline, and Denis Nekipelov. Mechanism design for data science. InProceedings of the 15th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pages 711–712, 2014

work page 2014
[7]

Online display advertising markets: A literature review and future directions.Information Systems Research, 31(2):556–575, 2020

Hana Choi, Carl F Mela, Santiago R Balseiro, and Adam Leary. Online display advertising markets: A literature review and future directions.Information Systems Research, 31(2):556–575, 2020

work page 2020
[8]

Multipart pricing of public goods.Public Choice, pages 17–33, 1971

Edward H Clarke. Multipart pricing of public goods.Public Choice, pages 17–33, 1971

work page 1971
[9]

The sample complexity of revenue maximization

Richard Cole and Tim Roughgarden. The sample complexity of revenue maximization. InProceedings of the Forty-Sixth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 243–252, 2014

work page 2014
[10]

Auctions with llm summaries

Avinava Dubey, Zhe Feng, Rahul Kidambi, Aranyak Mehta, and Di Wang. Auctions with llm summaries. InProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 713–722, 2024

work page 2024
[11]

Mech- anism design for large language models

Paul Duetting, Vahab Mirrokni, Renato Paes Leme, Haifeng Xu, and Song Zuo. Mech- anism design for large language models. InProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024, pages 144–155, 2024

work page 2024
[12]

Online adver- tisements with llms: Opportunities and challenges.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.07601, 2023

Soheil Feizi, MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi, Keivan Rezaei, and Suho Shin. Online adver- tisements with llms: Opportunities and challenges.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.07601, 2023. 13

work page arXiv 2023
[13]

Incentives in teams.Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pages 617–631, 1973

Theodore Groves. Incentives in teams.Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pages 617–631, 1973

work page 1973
[14]

Realm: retrieval-augmented language model pre-training

Kelvin Guu, Kenton Lee, Zora Tung, Panupong Pasupat, and Ming-Wei Chang. Realm: retrieval-augmented language model pre-training. InProceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 3929–3938, 2020

work page 2020
[15]

Ad auctions for llms via retrieval augmented generation.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:18445–18480, 2024

MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi, Sébastien Lahaie, Keivan Rezaei, and Suho Shin. Ad auctions for llms via retrieval augmented generation.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:18445–18480, 2024

work page 2024
[16]

Online auction design using distribution-free uncertainty quantification with applications to e-commerce.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 121(553):137–148, 2026

Jiale Han and Xiaowu Dai. Online auction design using distribution-free uncertainty quantification with applications to e-commerce.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 121(553):137–148, 2026

work page 2026
[17]

Gem-bench: A benchmark for ad-injected response generation within generative engine marketing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.14221, 2025

Silan Hu, Shiqi Zhang, Yimin Shi, and Xiaokui Xiao. Gem-bench: A benchmark for ad-injected response generation within generative engine marketing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.14221, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[18]

Leveraging passage retrieval with generative models for open domain question answering

Gautier Izacard and Edouard Grave. Leveraging passage retrieval with generative models for open domain question answering. InProceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume, pages 874–880, 2021

work page 2021
[19]

Academic Press, 2009

Vijay Krishna.Auction theory. Academic Press, 2009

work page 2009
[20]

Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:9459–9474, 2020

Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Naman Goyal, Heinrich Küttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rocktäschel, et al. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:9459–9474, 2020

work page 2020
[21]

Springer, 1961

Alfred Marshall, Claude William Guillebaud, et al.Principles of economics, volume 1. Springer, 1961

work page 1961
[22]

Ad click prediction: a view from the trenches

H Brendan McMahan, Gary Holt, David Sculley, Michael Young, Dietmar Ebner, Julian Grady, Lan Nie, Todd Phillips, Eugene Davydov, Daniel Golovin, et al. Ad click prediction: a view from the trenches. InProceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 1222–1230, 2013

work page 2013
[23]

Large Language Models: A Survey

Shervin Minaee, Tomas Mikolov, Narjes Nikzad, Meysam Chenaghlu, Richard Socher, Xavier Amatriain, and Jianfeng Gao. Large language models: A survey.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.06196, 2024

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[24]

Optimal auction design.Mathematics of Operations Research, 6(1): 58–73, 1981

Roger B Myerson. Optimal auction design.Mathematics of Operations Research, 6(1): 58–73, 1981

work page 1981
[25]

Obtaining well calibrated probabilities using bayesian binning

Mahdi Pakdaman Naeini, Gregory Cooper, and Milos Hauskrecht. Obtaining well calibrated probabilities using bayesian binning. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 29, 2015. 14

work page 2015
[26]

Reserve prices in internet advertising auctions: A field experiment.Journal of Political Economy, 131(12):3352–3376, 2023

Michael Ostrovsky and Michael Schwarz. Reserve prices in internet advertising auctions: A field experiment.Journal of Political Economy, 131(12):3352–3376, 2023

work page 2023
[27]

Truthful aggregation of llms with an application to online advertising.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.05905, 2024

Ermis Soumalias, Michael J Curry, and Sven Seuken. Truthful aggregation of llms with an application to online advertising.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.05905, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[28]

Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models

Hugo Touvron, Louis Martin, Kevin Stone, Peter Albert, Amjad Almahairi, Yasmine Babaei, Nikolay Bashlykov, Soumya Batra, Prajjwal Bhargava, Shruti Bhosale, et al. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288, 2023

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[29]

Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders.The Journal of Finance, 16(1):8–37, 1961

William Vickrey. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders.The Journal of Finance, 16(1):8–37, 1961

work page 1961
[30]

Retrieval-augmented generation for ai-generated content: A survey.Data Science and Engineering, pages 1–29, 2026

Penghao Zhao, Hailin Zhang, Qinhan Yu, Zhengren Wang, Yunteng Geng, Fangcheng Fu, Ling Yang, Wentao Zhang, Jie Jiang, and Bin Cui. Retrieval-augmented generation for ai-generated content: A survey.Data Science and Engineering, pages 1–29, 2026

work page 2026
[31]

A Survey of Large Language Models

Wayne Xin Zhao, Kun Zhou, Junyi Li, Tianyi Tang, Xiaolei Wang, Yupeng Hou, Yingqian Min, Beichen Zhang, Junjie Zhang, Zican Dong, et al. A survey of large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.18223, 1(2):1–124, 2023. 15 Appendix Appendix A. Choice of the Organic Social Welfare Function We adopt f(q 0)∶=ηqβ 0 with η, β> 0in our experiments. A similar ...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[32]

Take off with SunWing Airlines, your trusted partner for seamless travel across the Pacific and beyond

SunWing Airlines: A Pacific-focused airline offering direct routes to tropical destina- tions with premium in-flight service and flexible booking options. Take off with SunWing Airlines, your trusted partner for seamless travel across the Pacific and beyond. With spacious cabins, award-winning in-flight service, and direct routes to the world’s most breat...

work page
[33]

Discover the perfect retreat with TropicStay, the premier platform for booking vacation rentals in the world’s most beautiful destinations

TropicStay: A vacation rental platform connecting travelers with handpicked, locally- owned properties in the world’s most beautiful destinations. Discover the perfect retreat with TropicStay, the premier platform for booking vacation rentals in the world’s most beautiful destinations. From oceanfront villas to cozy jungle hideaways, TropicStay connects t...

work page
[34]

WanderBite: A food discovery app that connects travelers with the best local restau- rants and hidden dining gems around the globe. Unlock the culinary soul of every destination with WanderBite, the app that connects food lovers to the best local restaurants, street food spots, and hidden dining gems around the globe. Whether you’re craving fresh poke bow...

work page
[35]

Introducing NovaSkin, the dermatologist-approved skincare line engineered for the modern lifestyle

NovaSkin: A dermatologist-approved skincare brand offering reef-safe, SPF-focused products designed for active, outdoor lifestyles. Introducing NovaSkin, the dermatologist-approved skincare line engineered for the modern lifestyle. From SPF-50 daily moisturizers to overnight repair serums, No- vaSkin’s lightweight, reef-safe formulas protect and restore y...

work page
[36]

Stay charged through every adventure with GridPower Bank, the ultra-slim, high- capacity portable charger built for life on the move

GridPower Bank: A portable charging brand producing ultra-slim, waterproof power banks built for travelers and outdoor adventurers. Stay charged through every adventure with GridPower Bank, the ultra-slim, high- capacity portable charger built for life on the move. Featuring rapid-charge technology, dual USB-C ports, and a rugged waterproof design, GridPo...

work page
[37]

Velora: A tech company that designs and sells premium, seamlessly integrated smart devices and services for a sophisticated and efficient lifestyle

work page
[38]

BookHaven: An online bookstore offering a vast selection of books across all genres with a seamless shopping experience and reliable delivery

work page
[39]

MassMart: A membership-based retail store offering premium bulk products at un- beatable prices with a focus on customer satisfaction and community support

work page
[40]

EspressoEdge: A premium coffee shop offering high-quality, handcrafted beverages made from the finest Arabica beans, providing a luxurious coffee experience for all

work page
[41]

SocialHub: A leading social media platform that connects over two billion users through personalized news feeds, interactive groups, and tools for sharing life’s moments and promoting businesses

work page
[42]

ColaBubbles: The world’s favorite soft drink, known for its unique flavor blend and effervescent bubbles that have been delighting people for over a century

work page
[43]

FizzyPop: An iconic soft drink celebrated for its crisp, refreshing flavor and vibrant effervescence, perfect for those who live life boldly and seek excitement in every moment

work page
[44]

SkyTech: The world’s leading aerospace company, designing and manufacturing ad- vanced commercial airplanes, defense systems, and space technologies to ensure safe and efficient global connectivity and exploration

work page
[45]

AeroDynamics: The global leader in aerospace innovation, designing and manufactur- ing advanced commercial aircraft that provide unparalleled comfort, efficiency, and reliability for a superior flying experience. 27

work page
[46]

MusicStream: The ultimate destination for streaming millions of songs with person- alized recommendations and offline listening capabilities, offering a seamless music experience anytime, anywhere

work page
[47]

What can I visit on a trip to Hawaii?

BrainChips: The global leader in semiconductor technology, providing cutting-edge processors that power a wide range of devices with industry-leading performance, reliability, and security for professionals, gamers, and more. Appendix G. No-Ad Response To measure output quality, we use semantic similarity between the ad-augmented output and the no-ad resp...

work page 1941