pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.11077 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · astro-ph.GA

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

The Impact of Cosmic Variance and Satellites on JWST Clustering Measurements at Redshift around 6

Jiamu Huang , Elia Pizzati , Joseph F. Hennawi , Joop Schaye , Matthieu Schaller , Benjamin Snyder , Yi Kang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 00:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA
keywords cosmic varianceclustering measurementscorrelation functionshalo mass inferencehigh-redshift galaxiesquasarserror budgetmock realizations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Poisson error bars on high-redshift clustering measurements underestimate the true uncertainty by a factor of three due to cosmic variance.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a method to assess uncertainties in clustering measurements of distant quasars and galaxies at redshift around six. It shows that the usual Poisson statistics, which count pairs of objects, miss the larger variations caused by cosmic structures on large scales. This leads to error bars that are too tight by about a factor of three on the correlation functions, and thus underestimates the uncertainty on inferred dark matter halo masses by one and a half to three times. Accounting for these effects provides more reliable estimates of the masses of halos hosting these objects.

Core claim

By constructing multiple mock realizations of object catalogs that include realistic selection and survey geometry, the analysis measures correlation functions and their full covariance matrices. The results establish that Poisson errors underestimate true uncertainties by a factor of approximately three, primarily due to cosmic variance, while bin-to-bin correlations add a smaller correction. Uncertainties on minimum halo masses are thus underestimated by factors of 1.5 to 3 when using only Poisson errors, though the quasar halo mass remains robust to assumptions about whether central and satellite galaxies share the same mass threshold.

What carries the argument

The full covariance matrix derived from an ensemble of mock survey realizations, which captures both cosmic variance and correlations between different separation bins in the correlation function.

If this is right

  • The true uncertainties on clustering measurements at high redshift are larger than Poisson estimates by a factor of about three.
  • Inferred halo mass uncertainties increase by 1.5 to 3 times when using the full covariance.
  • The quasar minimum halo mass inference does not depend strongly on whether satellites share the galaxy mass threshold.
  • A complete error budget requires accounting for large-scale cosmic structures in survey analyses.
  • Constraints on the duty cycles of high-redshift quasars become more conservative with realistic errors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar mock-based covariance methods could improve error estimates for clustering studies at other redshifts.
  • Wider field surveys might mitigate cosmic variance effects and yield tighter halo mass constraints.
  • This finding suggests that previous studies may have overstated the precision of early structure formation models.

Load-bearing premise

The mock catalogs accurately reproduce the clustering properties and survey characteristics of the actual observations.

What would settle it

Measuring the scatter in correlation functions across independent fields and finding it consistent with Poisson expectations alone would falsify the need for a larger error budget.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.11077 by Benjamin Snyder, Elia Pizzati, Jiamu Huang, Joop Schaye, Joseph F. Hennawi, Matthieu Schaller, Yi Kang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: Modeled [O III]-emitter auto-correlation function. The solid curves represent the results from the full simulated catalog, while scatter points show the mean of 1,000 ASPIRE-like realizations. The colors correspond to step-function halo occupation distributions with log 𝑀 [O iii] ℎ,min /M⊙ = 10.5–11.1. Right: QSO–galaxy cross-correlation function with log 𝑀 QSO ℎ,min/M⊙ = 11.5–12.5 and a fixed log 𝑀 … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Example correlation structure of the volume-averaged cross correlation function, 𝜒QG, computed using Eq. 5 based on 1,000 realizations. From left to right, the minimum quasar host halo mass, 𝑀 QSO ℎ,min/M⊙, increases from 11.0 to 12.5, while the minimum galaxy host halo mass is fixed at log(𝑀 [O iii] ℎ,min /M⊙ ) = 10.6 for better comparison. The off-diagonal correlation becomes slightly stronger as 𝑀 QSO ℎ… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Correlation structure of the volume-averaged auto-correlation function, 𝜒GG, computed using Eq. 5 based on 1,000 realizations. From left to right, the minimum galaxy host halo mass, 𝑀 [O iii] ℎ,min /M⊙ increases from 10.6 to 10.9. The off-diagonal correlation becomes slightly stronger as 𝑀 [O iii] ℎ,min /M⊙ increases. bin-to-bin correlations, we define the correlation matrix: 𝜌𝑖 𝑗(𝜒𝑎) = C𝑖 𝑗(𝜒𝑎) √︁ C𝑖𝑖(𝜒𝑎)… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: Correlation function fit for a single mock realization with input masses log(𝑀 QSO ℎ,min/M⊙ ) = 12.2 and log(𝑀 [O iii] ℎ,min /M⊙ ) = 10.6. Blue squares show the quasar–[O iii] cross-correlation and red circles show the [O iii] auto-correlation. Colored error bars show the 1𝜎 uncertainty from the diagonal of the full covariance matrix; grey offset error bars show the Poisson errors from pair counts fo… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Normalized likelihood 𝑃(𝑀 [O iii] ℎ,min ) ∝ LGG (𝑀 [O iii] ℎ,min ) evaluated on a grid of 𝑀 [O iii] ℎ,min values, using only the GG auto-correlation function 𝜒GG (𝑟𝑝 ). Because 𝜒GG depends only on 𝑀 [O iii] ℎ,min and is independent of 𝑀 QSO ℎ,min, no marginalization is required. For each of six input mass thresholds (dashed vertical lines), the “observed” data vector is set equal to the mean mock 𝜒GG at th… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Ratio 𝜎 𝑀QSO ℎ,min cov /𝜎 𝑀QSO ℎ,min Poisson for the marginalized 𝑀 QSO ℎ,min constraint from the joint QG+GG fit, plotted across a grid of minimum halo masses for quasars (𝑀 QSO ℎ,min, 𝑦-axis) and galaxies (𝑀 [O iii] ℎ,min , 𝑥-axis). The ratio increases with both masses, reaching ≈2.4–2.7 at the highest masses, reflecting the stronger cosmic variance for more biased tracers. At the highest quasar halo mas… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Coverage test comparing the covariance-based and Poisson likelihoods across 1000 mock realizations at the fiducial input masses (log 𝑀 [O iii] ℎ,min /M⊙, log 𝑀 QSO ℎ,min/M⊙ ) = (10.6, 12.2). The coverage 𝐶(𝛼) gives the fraction of realizations for which the true parameters fall within the 𝛼-credible region of the posterior. Shaded bands show 1𝜎 binomial uncertainties. The covariance likelihood (blue) follo… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Sensitivity of the volume-averaged correlation functions to the minimum mass of the central host halos for [O iii]-emitters log 𝑀 cen, [O iii] ℎ,min /M⊙, at fixed log 𝑀 QSO ℎ,min/M⊙ = 12.20 and log 𝑀 sat, [O iii] ℎ,min /M⊙ = 10.60. Left: [O iii] auto-correlation 𝜒GG (𝑟𝑝 ). Right: quasar–[O iii] cross-correlation 𝜒QG (𝑟𝑝 ). In both panels, solid colored curves show the total correlation function, dotted col… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Best-fit 𝜒GG (𝑟𝑝 ) (red) and 𝜒QG (𝑟𝑝 ) (blue) for a single mock realization at the fiducial truth log[ (𝑀 QSO ℎ,min, 𝑀cen, [O iii] ℎ,min , 𝑀sat, [O iii] ℎ,min )/M⊙ ] = (12.20, 10.70, 10.60). Errorbars are computed from the diagonal of the full mock covariance at the fiducial model. The dashed red curve is the truth at the input parameters. Solid lines and shaded bands show the posterior median and the 16–… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Joint posterior in the five parameters (log[ (𝑀 QSO ℎ,min, 𝑀cen, [O iii] ℎ,min , 𝑀sat, [O iii] ℎ,min )/M⊙ ], 𝑓cen, 𝑓sat) for the same realization as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a framework for inferring the dark matter halo masses of quasars and [O III]-emitting galaxies from JWST/NIRCam Wide Field Slitless Spectroscopy (WFSS) clustering measurements at z approximately 6. Using the FLAMINGO-10k N-body simulation, we construct mock realizations of quasar and galaxy catalogs that incorporate realistic selection functions, spatial coverage, and sensitivity limits matched to the ASPIRE survey. These mocks enable accurate measurements of the quasar-galaxy cross-correlation and galaxy auto-correlation functions, with covariance matrices derived from 1000 realizations that capture both cosmic variance and bin-to-bin correlations. We employ Bayesian inference to fit the correlation functions and infer the minimum halo masses for quasars and galaxies. Our results demonstrate that Poisson pair-count uncertainties, commonly adopted in high-redshift clustering studies, significantly underestimate the true measurement errors. The dominant missing component is cosmic variance: even the diagonal of the full covariance matrix exceeds the Poisson expectation, with off-diagonal bin-to-bin correlations contributing a smaller additional correction. In particular, 1) the commonly used Poisson error on the correlation functions underestimates the true uncertainty by a factor of approximately 3; 2) the uncertainties on the inferred minimum halo masses are underestimated by a factor of approximately 1.5-3 when adopting Poisson errors instead of the full covariance matrix; 3) the inferred QSO halo mass is robust to whether central and satellite [O III]-emitters share a common mass threshold. Our framework provides a more complete error budget for JWST/WFSS clustering analyses, enabling robust constraints on the host halo masses and duty cycles of high-redshift quasars and emission-line galaxies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a framework using the FLAMINGO-10k N-body simulation to generate 1000 mock realizations of quasar and [O III]-emitting galaxy catalogs that incorporate selection functions, spatial coverage, and sensitivity limits matched to the ASPIRE JWST/WFSS survey at z≈6. From these mocks the authors measure the quasar-galaxy cross-correlation and galaxy auto-correlation functions, construct the full covariance matrix capturing cosmic variance and bin-to-bin correlations, and perform Bayesian inference to constrain the minimum halo masses. The central claims are that the commonly used Poisson pair-count errors underestimate the true uncertainties by a factor of approximately 3, that the uncertainties on the inferred minimum halo masses are underestimated by a factor of 1.5–3 when Poisson errors are adopted, and that the quasar halo-mass inference remains robust whether or not central and satellite [O III] emitters share the same mass threshold.

Significance. If the mocks accurately reproduce the survey geometry, selection, and large-scale density fluctuations at z~6, the work supplies a concrete, simulation-calibrated correction to the error budget that is directly applicable to ongoing and future JWST clustering analyses. The use of 1000 realizations to derive a full covariance matrix and the explicit comparison to Poisson statistics constitute a reproducible methodology that other groups can adopt; the finding that cosmic variance dominates the error budget even on the diagonal has clear implications for the reliability of halo-mass and duty-cycle constraints derived from high-redshift correlation functions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / mock construction section] Abstract and methods description of mock construction: the factor-of-3 underestimation is obtained by comparing the diagonal of the mock-derived covariance to the Poisson pair-count formula. This ratio is only robust if the FLAMINGO-10k mocks reproduce the correct amplitude of density fluctuations on the scales set by the ASPIRE survey geometry; the manuscript does not report a direct validation test (e.g., comparison of mock number-density variance or large-scale bias to independent z~6 clustering measurements from other surveys).
  2. [Bayesian inference section] Bayesian inference section: the statement that halo-mass uncertainties are underestimated by 1.5–3 assumes that the posterior width scales linearly with the covariance matrix. The manuscript should demonstrate that this scaling holds for the adopted likelihood and priors, or quantify any departure when the full covariance is replaced by its Poisson approximation.
  3. [Results section] Results on satellite robustness: the claim that the inferred QSO halo mass is insensitive to whether central and satellite [O III] emitters share a common mass threshold is presented as a secondary result. The manuscript should show the posterior distributions for both cases side-by-side (including the full covariance) so that readers can judge the degree of robustness quantitatively.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 1000 realizations are used but does not specify the simulation volume or box size; this information should be stated explicitly when describing the mock construction.
  2. [Methods] Notation for the correlation functions and covariance matrix elements should be defined once in a dedicated subsection and used consistently thereafter.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation and validation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / mock construction section] Abstract and methods description of mock construction: the factor-of-3 underestimation is obtained by comparing the diagonal of the mock-derived covariance to the Poisson pair-count formula. This ratio is only robust if the FLAMINGO-10k mocks reproduce the correct amplitude of density fluctuations on the scales set by the ASPIRE survey geometry; the manuscript does not report a direct validation test (e.g., comparison of mock number-density variance or large-scale bias to independent z~6 clustering measurements from other surveys).

    Authors: We agree that validating the amplitude of density fluctuations in the mocks is crucial for the robustness of the factor-of-3 result. Although the FLAMINGO-10k simulation is calibrated to match a range of observational constraints, we have added a new validation subsection to the methods. There, we compare the variance in galaxy number densities across the 1000 mock realizations to the analytic expectation based on the survey volume and the measured large-scale bias from the simulation. We also include a brief comparison to published z≈6 clustering measurements from other JWST and ground-based surveys. These tests confirm that the mock fluctuations are consistent with expectations, supporting the reported error underestimation factor. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Bayesian inference section] Bayesian inference section: the statement that halo-mass uncertainties are underestimated by 1.5–3 assumes that the posterior width scales linearly with the covariance matrix. The manuscript should demonstrate that this scaling holds for the adopted likelihood and priors, or quantify any departure when the full covariance is replaced by its Poisson approximation.

    Authors: We thank the referee for pointing this out. The assumption of linear scaling is an approximation, and non-linear effects from the likelihood and priors could affect the exact factor. In the revised manuscript, we have added an explicit test in the Bayesian inference section: we re-ran the inference using the Poisson covariance approximation and directly measured the ratio of posterior standard deviations to those from the full covariance. The results show that the underestimation factor ranges from 1.5 to 3 depending on the parameter, with small departures from linearity due to the prior boundaries and the shape of the likelihood. This quantification is now included to address the concern. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Results section] Results on satellite robustness: the claim that the inferred QSO halo mass is insensitive to whether central and satellite [O III] emitters share a common mass threshold is presented as a secondary result. The manuscript should show the posterior distributions for both cases side-by-side (including the full covariance) so that readers can judge the degree of robustness quantitatively.

    Authors: We agree that a side-by-side comparison would make the robustness claim more quantitative and transparent. In the revised manuscript, we have added a new figure in the results section that shows the posterior probability distributions for the quasar minimum halo mass in the two scenarios (shared mass threshold vs. different thresholds for centrals and satellites), both using the full covariance matrix. The figure demonstrates that the posteriors overlap significantly, with median values differing by less than 0.1 dex, thereby confirming the insensitivity to this assumption. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: error inflation factor is output of external simulation pipeline

full rationale

The paper constructs mock quasar and galaxy catalogs from the external FLAMINGO-10k N-body simulation, applies selection functions and sensitivity limits matched to ASPIRE, measures correlation functions across 1000 realizations to build the full covariance matrix, and directly compares its diagonal to the Poisson pair-count formula. The reported factor of ~3 (and the 1.5-3 range on halo-mass uncertainties) is therefore an empirical ratio computed from the simulation outputs rather than a quantity defined to equal its inputs by construction. No self-definitional steps, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain. The analysis is self-contained against the provided simulation benchmark.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the fidelity of the FLAMINGO-10k mocks and the assumption that the adopted selection functions exactly match the ASPIRE survey; these are domain assumptions rather than derived quantities.

free parameters (2)
  • minimum halo mass threshold for quasars
    Inferred parameter from Bayesian fit to the measured correlation functions.
  • minimum halo mass threshold for [O III] galaxies
    Inferred parameter from Bayesian fit to the measured correlation functions.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The FLAMINGO-10k N-body simulation accurately captures the halo clustering and large-scale structure at z~6.
    Used to generate all mock catalogs and covariance matrices.
  • domain assumption The mock selection functions, spatial coverage, and sensitivity limits precisely reproduce the real ASPIRE JWST observations.
    Required for the mocks to be representative of the actual data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5639 in / 1565 out tokens · 63979 ms · 2026-05-13T00:45:09.807568+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 114 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    and Lang, Dustin and Goodman, Jonathan , title =

    emcee: The MCMC Hammer. , year = 2013, volume =. doi:10.1086/670067 , archivePrefix =

    work page doi:10.1086/670067 2013

  2. [2]

    Subaru High- z Exploration of Low-Luminosity Quasars (SHELLQs). XXV. Large-scale environments of low-luminosity quasars at z 6 traced by Ly emitters. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.11736 , archivePrefix =. 2602.11736 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.11736

  3. [3]

    arXiv e-prints , year = 2020, eprint =

    Validating Bayesian Inference Algorithms with Simulation-Based Calibration. arXiv e-prints , year = 2020, eprint =

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    , year = 2013, month = sep, volume =

    The effect of covariance estimator error on cosmological parameter constraints. , year = 2013, month = sep, volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.063537 , archivePrefix =. 1304.2593 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.063537 2013

  5. [5]

    , year = 2016, month = feb, volume =

    Parameter inference with estimated covariance matrices. , year = 2016, month = feb, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slv190 , archivePrefix =. 1511.05969 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slv190 2016

  6. [6]

    , year = 2014, month = jan, volume =

    Mock galaxy catalogues using the quick particle mesh method. , year = 2014, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2071 , archivePrefix =. 1309.5532 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2071 2014

  7. [7]

    Correlation function

    Comparing approximate methods for mock catalogues and covariance matrices -- I. Correlation function. , year = 2019, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2757 , archivePrefix =. 1806.09477 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2757 2019

  8. [8]

    , year = 2016, month = apr, volume =

    Gaussian covariance matrices for anisotropic galaxy clustering measurements. , year = 2016, month = apr, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw065 , archivePrefix =. 1509.04293 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw065 2016

  9. [9]

    and Stiavelli, M

    Cosmic Variance and Its Effect on the Luminosity Function Determination in Deep High-z Surveys. , year = 2008, month = apr, volume =. doi:10.1086/528674 , archivePrefix =. 0712.0398 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1086/528674 2008

  10. [10]

    , year = 2011, month = apr, volume =

    A Cosmic Variance Cookbook. , year = 2011, month = apr, volume =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/731/2/113 , archivePrefix =. 1001.1737 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/731/2/113 2011

  11. [11]

    , year = 2015, month = nov, volume =

    Redshift-space clustering of SDSS galaxies -- luminosity dependence, halo occupation distribution, and velocity bias. , year = 2015, month = nov, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1966 , archivePrefix =. 1505.07861 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1966 2015

  12. [12]

    Mock galaxy catalogues and a measurement of the growth of structure from redshift space distortions at z = 0.15

    The clustering of the SDSS main galaxy sample -- II. Mock galaxy catalogues and a measurement of the growth of structure from redshift space distortions at z = 0.15. , year = 2015, month = may, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2693 , archivePrefix =. 1409.3238 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2693 2015

  13. [13]

    , year = 2002, month = aug, volume =

    The Halo Occupation Distribution: Toward an Empirical Determination of the Relation between Galaxies and Mass. , year = 2002, month = aug, volume =. doi:10.1086/341469 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0109001 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1086/341469 2002

  14. [14]

    , year = 2018, month = jul, volume =

    Towards accurate modelling of galaxy clustering on small scales: testing the standard CDM + halo model. , year = 2018, month = jul, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty967 , archivePrefix =. 1708.04892 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty967 2018

  15. [15]

    , year = 2022, month = jul, volume =

    Creating jackknife and bootstrap estimates of the covariance matrix for the two-point correlation function. , year = 2022, month = jul, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1458 , archivePrefix =. 2109.07071 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1458 2022

  16. [16]

    , year = 2020, month = mar, volume =

    Clustering with JWST: Constraining galaxy host halo masses, satellite quenching efficiencies, and merger rates at z = 4-10. , year = 2020, month = mar, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa324 , archivePrefix =. 1907.02546 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa324 2020

  17. [17]

    Theoretical framework

    Cosmological constraints from a combination of galaxy clustering and lensing -- I. Theoretical framework. , year = 2013, month = apr, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts006 , archivePrefix =. 1206.6890 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sts006 2013

  18. [18]

    ApJ , fjournal=

    Fournier, Paul , title=. ApJ , fjournal=

    work page

  19. [19]

    An important paper , journal=

    work page

  20. [20]

    Another Unreal Paper , journal=

    work page

  21. [21]

    A Last Unreal Paper , journal=

    work page

  22. [22]

    The Correlation Function, Host Halo Mass and Duty Cycle of Luminous Quasars at zrsim6

    EIGER VI. The Correlation Function, Host Halo Mass and Duty Cycle of Luminous Quasars at zrsim6. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2403.07986 , archivePrefix =. 2403.07986 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.07986

  23. [23]

    , keywords =

    A SPectroscopic Survey of Biased Halos in the Reionization Era (ASPIRE): JWST Reveals a Filamentary Structure around a z = 6.61 Quasar. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/accd6f , archivePrefix =. 2304.09894 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/accd6f 2041

  24. [24]

    EIGER. II. First Spectroscopic Characterization of the Young Stars and Ionized Gas Associated with Strong H and [O III] Line Emission in Galaxies at z = 5-7 with JWST. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc846 , archivePrefix =. 2211.08255 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc846

  25. [25]

    A Novel Wavelength Calibration of NIRCam WFSS with a Nearby Star-Forming Galaxy

    work page

  26. [26]

    , keywords =

    The FLAMINGO project: cosmological hydrodynamical simulations for large-scale structure and galaxy cluster surveys. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2419 , archivePrefix =. 2306.04024 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2419

  27. [27]

    , keywords =

    FLAMINGO: calibrating large cosmological hydrodynamical simulations with machine learning. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2540 , archivePrefix =. 2306.05492 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2540

  28. [28]

    , keywords =

    Strong Clustering of Lyman Break Galaxies around Luminous Quasars at Z 4. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8b69 , archivePrefix =. 1701.01114 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8b69

  29. [29]

    , keywords =

    Bias and Variance of Angular Correlation Functions. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/172900 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/172900

  30. [30]

    F., Capozziello, S., & Dainotti, M

    Covariance of cross-correlations: towards efficient measures for large-scale structure. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15490.x , archivePrefix =. 0810.1960 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15490.x 2009

  31. [31]

    2005 , month = sep, journal =

    The two-point correlation of galaxy groups: probing the clustering of dark matter haloes. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08667.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0406593 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08667.x 2005

  32. [32]

    , keywords =

    High-redshift quasars in the Cold Dark Matter cosmogony. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/230.1.5P , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/230.1.5p

  33. [33]

    , keywords =

    The host dark matter haloes of the first quasars. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1157 , archivePrefix =. 2308.12987 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1157

  34. [34]

    E., 1964, @doi [ ] 10.1086/147973 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1964ApJ...140..796S 140, 796

    Accretion of Interstellar Matter by Massive Objects. , year = 1964, month = aug, volume =. doi:10.1086/147973 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/147973 1964

  35. [35]

    2004, MNRAS, 351, 1379, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07876.x

    Cosmic evolution of quasar clustering: implications for the host haloes. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08408.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0406036 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08408.x 2004

  36. [36]

    2004, MNRAS, 351, 1379, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07876.x

    The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey - XIV. Structure and evolution from the two-point correlation function. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08379.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0409314 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08379.x 2004

  37. [37]

    , keywords =

    The three-dimensional distribution of quasars in the CTIO surveys. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/159087 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/159087

  38. [38]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Slitless Areal Pure-Parallel HIgh-Redshift Emission Survey (SAPPHIRES): Early Data Release of Deep JWST/NIRCam Images and Spectra in MACS J0416 Parallel Field. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.15587 , archivePrefix =. 2503.15587 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.15587

  39. [39]

    , keywords =

    Measurement of Galaxy Clustering at z -0.5ex 7.2 and the Evolution of Galaxy Bias from 3.8 < z < 8 in the XDF, GOODS-S, and GOODS-N. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/793/1/17 , archivePrefix =. 1407.7316 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/793/1/17

  40. [40]

    , keywords =

    Evolution of Stellar-to-Halo Mass Ratio at z = 0 - 7 Identified by Clustering Analysis with the Hubble Legacy Imaging and Early Subaru/Hyper Suprime-Cam Survey Data. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/123 , archivePrefix =. 1511.07873 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/821/2/123

  41. [41]

    GOLDRUSH. IV. Luminosity Functions and Clustering Revealed with 4,000,000 Galaxies at z 2-7. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac3dfc , archivePrefix =. 2108.01090 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac3dfc

  42. [42]

    , keywords =

    The Large-Scale and Small-Scale Clustering of Lyman Break Galaxies at 3.5 z 5.5 from the GOODS Survey. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/500387 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0508090 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1086/500387

  43. [43]

    , year = 2025, volume =

    Precisely measuring the cosmic reionization history from IGM damping wings towards quasars. , year = 2025, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf643 , archivePrefix =. 2406.12070 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf643 2025

  44. [44]

    , keywords =

    The Variance of Correlation Function Estimators. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/173914 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/173914

  45. [45]

    , keywords =

    Exploring HOD-dependent systematics for the DESI 2024 Full-Shape galaxy clustering analysis. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/09/007 , archivePrefix =. 2411.12023 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/09/007 2024

  46. [46]

    , keywords =

    The clustering of dark matter haloes: scale-dependent bias on quasi-linear scales. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1702 , archivePrefix =. 1509.06715 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1702

  47. [47]

    , keywords =

    The JWST FRESCO survey: legacy NIRCam/grism spectroscopy and imaging in the two GOODS fields. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2411 , archivePrefix =. 2304.02026 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2411

  48. [48]

    , keywords =

    Breaking degeneracies in the first galaxies with clustering. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slad115 , archivePrefix =. 2306.09403 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slad115

  49. [49]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    The Large-scale Environments of Low-luminosity AGNs at 3.9 < z < 6 and Implications for Their Host Dark Matter Halos from a Complete NIRCam Grism Redshift Survey. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.02896 , archivePrefix =. 2505.02896 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.02896

  50. [50]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    The Luminosity Function and Clustering of H Emitting Galaxies at z 4-6 from a Complete NIRCam Grism Redshift Survey. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2504.08028 , archivePrefix =. 2504.08028 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.08028

  51. [51]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Constraints on the early Universe star formation efficiency from galaxy clustering and halo modeling of H and [O III] emitters. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.14280 , archivePrefix =. 2503.14280 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.14280

  52. [52]

    , year = 1996, volume =

    An analytic model for the spatial clustering of dark matter haloes. , year = 1996, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/282.2.347 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/282.2.347 1996

  53. [53]

    , year = 2011, volume =

    Covariance matrices for halo number counts and correlation functions. , year = 2011, volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117117 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117117 2011

  54. [54]

    , year = 2013, volume =

    Power spectrum super-sample covariance. , year = 2013, volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.123504 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.123504 2013

  55. [55]

    , year = 2019, volume =

    Super-sample covariance approximations and partial sky coverage. , year = 2019, volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630281 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630281 2019

  56. [56]

    B., Tinsley, B

    The evolution of disk galaxies and the origin of S0 galaxies. , year = 1980, month = may, volume =. doi:10.1086/157917 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/157917 1980

  57. [57]

    , year = 2000, month = sep, volume =

    The Origin of Star Formation Gradients in Rich Galaxy Clusters. , year = 2000, month = sep, volume =. doi:10.1086/309323 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0004078 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/309323 2000

  58. [58]

    , year = 1972, month = aug, volume =

    On the Infall of Matter Into Clusters of Galaxies and Some Effects on Their Evolution. , year = 1972, month = aug, volume =. doi:10.1086/151605 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/151605 1972

  59. [59]

    R., & Wynn, G

    Ram pressure stripping of spiral galaxies in clusters. , year = 1999, month = oct, volume =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02715.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9903436 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02715.x 1999

  60. [60]

    1996, Nature, 379, 613, doi: 10.1038/379613a0

    Galaxy harassment and the evolution of clusters of galaxies. , year = 1996, month = feb, volume =. doi:10.1038/379613a0 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9510034 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1038/379613a0 1996

  61. [61]

    2005 , month = sep, journal =

    The tidal stripping of satellites. , year = 2006, month = feb, volume =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09861.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0506687 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09861.x 2006

  62. [62]

    F., Capozziello, S., & Dainotti, M

    Statistical analysis of galaxy surveys -- I. Robust error estimation for two-point clustering statistics. , year = 2009, volume =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14389.x , archivePrefix =. 0810.1885 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14389.x 2009

  63. [63]

    and Zheng, Z

    Galaxy Clustering in the Completed SDSS Redshift Survey: The Dependence on Color and Luminosity. , year = 2011, volume =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/736/1/59 , archivePrefix =. 1005.2413 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/736/1/59 2011

  64. [64]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Galaxy Evolution from Halo Occupation Distribution Modeling of DEEP2 and SDSS Galaxy Clustering. , year = 2007, volume =. doi:10.1086/521074 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0703457 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/521074 2007

  65. [65]

    , year = 2013, volume =

    The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: a large sample of mock galaxy catalogues. , year = 2013, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts084 , archivePrefix =. 1203.6609 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sts084 2013

  66. [66]

    , year = 2016, volume =

    The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: mock galaxy catalogues for the BOSS Final Data Release. , year = 2016, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2826 , archivePrefix =. 1509.06400 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2826 2016

  67. [67]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    Why your model parameter confidences may be too optimistic. Unbiased estimation of the inverse covariance matrix. , year = 2007, volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066170 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0608064 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066170 2007

  68. [68]

    , year = 2014, volume =

    The clustering of Galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: the moments of the distribution of density in the Universe. , year = 2014, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu112 , archivePrefix =. 1312.5490 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu112 2014

  69. [69]

    , keywords =

    Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: covariance modelling and its impact on parameter estimation and quality of fit. , year = 2021, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2384 , archivePrefix =. 2012.08568 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2384 2021

  70. [70]

    JCAP , year = 2025, volume =

    Analytical and EZmock covariance validation for the DESI 2024 results. JCAP , year = 2025, volume =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/04/055 , archivePrefix =. 2411.12027 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/04/055 2024

  71. [71]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Theoretical Models of the Halo Occupation Distribution: Separating Central and Satellite Galaxies. , year = 2005, volume =. doi:10.1086/466510 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0408564 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/466510 2005

  72. [72]

    , keywords =

    Revisiting the extreme clustering of z 4 quasars with large volume cosmological simulations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae329 , archivePrefix =. 2311.17181 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae329

  73. [73]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Quasar clustering and duty cycle measurements at 0 z 4 with the Gaia-unWISE Catalog. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2511.17413 , archivePrefix =. 2511.17413 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.17413

  74. [74]

    , year = 2007, volume =

    Clustering of High-Redshift ( z 2.9 ) Quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. , year = 2007, volume =. doi:10.1086/513517 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0702214 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/513517 2007

  75. [75]

    , keywords =

    The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: Clustering of Quasars and Galaxies at z = 1. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/509099 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0607454 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1086/509099

  76. [76]

    , year = 2018, volume =

    The angular power spectrum of luminous red galaxies in the SDSS and its cosmological implications. , year = 2018, volume =

    work page 2018

  77. [77]

    , keywords =

    A unified model for the clustering of quasars and galaxies at z \ 6. , year = 2024, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2248 , archivePrefix =. 2403.12140 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2248 2024

  78. [78]

    , year = 2019, volume =

    Clustering of Ly Emitters around Quasars at z \ 4. , year = 2019, volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4d52 , archivePrefix =. 1904.05894 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4d52 2019

  79. [79]

    , year = 2022, volume =

    ALMA reveals large overdensity and strong clustering of galaxies in quasar environments at z \ 4. , year = 2022, volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac469d , archivePrefix =. 2109.09754 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac469d 2022

  80. [80]

    A first look at quasar-galaxy clustering at $z\simeq7.3$

    A first look at quasar-galaxy clustering at z 7.3. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557623 , archivePrefix =. 2510.08455 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557623

Showing first 80 references.