arxiv: 2605.11416 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · 💻 cs.CL

Recognition: no theorem link

Freeze Deep, Train Shallow: Interpretable Layer Allocation for Continued Pre-Training

Yu-Hang Wu , Qin-Yuan Liu , Qiu-Yang Zhao , Bo Jiang , Jiang-Feng Yang , Qing-Wei Cong

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 02:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CL

keywords continued pre-traininglayer-wise allocationLLM interpretabilityfreezing layersshallow trainingLayerTracerknowledge preservationC-Eval benchmark

0 comments

The pith

Training shallow layers while freezing deep layers outperforms full-parameter updates in continued pre-training of LLMs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents LayerTracer as a way to diagnose which layers in a language model handle task execution and how stable they are during training. Analysis shows deep layers are where tasks are critically executed yet remain stable against changes. Three experiments then test different strategies, finding that training only the shallow layers and freezing the deep ones gives better scores on Chinese knowledge benchmarks than updating all parameters or training the deep layers instead. This approach cuts training costs while better preserving the model's original knowledge, providing practical guidance for adapting large models with limited resources.

Core claim

Deep layers serve as critical and stable regions for task execution in LLMs. By freezing these deep layers and training only the shallow ones during continued pre-training, performance on C-Eval and CMMLU exceeds both full fine-tuning and the strategy of freezing shallow layers instead. A hybrid model case further confirms that high-quality pre-trained components placed in deep layers help retain core capabilities.

What carries the argument

LayerTracer, an architecture-agnostic framework that locates task execution positions in layers and measures their sensitivity to quantify representation evolution and stability patterns.

Load-bearing premise

The patterns of deep-layer criticality and stability identified by the diagnostic tool apply broadly enough to justify the allocation choice across models and continued pre-training scenarios.

What would settle it

Running the same controlled trials on a different model architecture or English-language benchmarks and finding that freezing shallow layers or full updates performs better would challenge the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.11416 by Bo Jiang, Jiang-Feng Yang, Qing-Wei Cong, Qin-Yuan Liu, Qiu-Yang Zhao, Yu-Hang Wu.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: The architectures of Qwen3 model and Qwen3.5 model. Qwen3 adopts a single architecture, while Qwen3.5 is a hybrid architecture with a 3:1 ratio of Full Attention to Linear Attention. tion: the lack of interpretable guidance for layerwise freeze–train allocation during continued pretraining. Thus, small and medium-sized teams are forced to rely on empirical heuristics when determining which layers to fre… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Overview of the LayerTracer framework. (a) Baseline projection: hidden states at each layer are projected [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Distribution details in the AntSynNET dataset, where 500 samples are evenly divided into 10 groups of 50 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Illustration of the proposed zone-strategy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: The architectures of Nemotron-Qwen model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Training loss curves across three layer-wise allocation strategies on the CCI3.0-HQ corpus. (a) Train [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Robustness analysis under Top-50 probability support on the AntSynNET dataset, where 500 samples [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Layer-wise TP and LS profiles of Qwen3- 710M-Base. The light green region denotes the shallow layer used in the midpoint split, where LS is relatively stronger and layers are more sensitive to perturbation. The light red region denotes the deep layers, where TP becomes more prominent and task evidence is mainly consolidated. The dashed line marks the 50% split used in the main experiments. The inset repor… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Selective layer-wise updates are essential for low-cost continued pre-training of Large Language Models (LLMs), yet determining which layers to freeze or train remains an empirical black-box problem due to the lack of interpretable guidance. To address this issue, we propose LayerTracer, an architecture-agnostic diagnostic framework that reveals the evolution patterns of layer-wise representations and stability by locating task execution positions and quantifying layer sensitivity. Analysis results reveal that deep layers act as critical regions for task execution and maintain high stability against disruptive updates. Guided by this finding, we conduct three controlled continued pre-training trials to compare diverse freeze-train strategies, demonstrating that training shallow layers while freezing deep layers consistently outperforms full-parameter fine-tuning and the opposite allocation on both C-Eval and CMMLU benchmarks. We further present a hybrid model case study, which validates that placing high-quality pre-trained modules in deep layers effectively preserves inherent knowledge of the model. This work delivers a low-cost and interpretable solution for resource-constrained teams, offering actionable guidance for layer-wise parameter allocation in continued pre-training and hybrid model construction.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper's main contribution is a diagnostic tool called LayerTracer that leads to a practical rule: train shallow layers and freeze deep ones for better continued pre-training results than full updates.

read the letter

The colleague should know that this work gives a concrete allocation strategy for continued pre-training: freeze the deep layers and train the shallow ones, and it beats both full-parameter updates and the reverse on C-Eval and CMMLU. They back the rule with LayerTracer, which tracks how representations evolve and how sensitive each layer is to changes, then run three controlled trials plus a hybrid model example to show the pattern holds when other factors stay fixed. That separation between diagnostic and test is a clean move. The hybrid case study also shows a direct way to slot in pre-trained deep modules without losing core knowledge, which is a nice practical touch for building mixed models on a budget. The approach is architecture-agnostic on paper, which broadens its reach beyond one specific LLM family. Soft spots are limited but real. The abstract and summary give no model sizes, dataset volumes, or statistical details, so the size of the gains and their stability across scales remain unclear from the high-level description. The assumption that deep-layer stability generalizes to new tasks or English-heavy benchmarks could use broader checks, though the controlled design does isolate allocation as the variable. No load-bearing circularity or internal mismatch shows up. This paper is for groups doing resource-limited LLM adaptation or hybrid construction who want an interpretable starting point instead of grid search. A reader focused on efficient fine-tuning would get usable guidance even if they plan to re-run the trials themselves. It deserves peer review because the idea is actionable, the experiments are structured to test the claim directly, and the practical payoff is clear enough to justify referee time for verification and extension.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes LayerTracer, an architecture-agnostic diagnostic framework that analyzes the evolution patterns of layer-wise representations and stability in LLMs to locate task execution positions and quantify layer sensitivity. Analysis reveals deep layers as critical for task execution yet highly stable, motivating a continued pre-training strategy of training shallow layers while freezing deep layers. Three controlled trials demonstrate this allocation outperforms full-parameter fine-tuning and the reverse (deep-train/shallow-freeze) on C-Eval and CMMLU, with an additional hybrid-model case study showing that high-quality pre-trained modules in deep layers preserve inherent knowledge.

Significance. If the results hold under rigorous verification, the work supplies a practical, interpretable alternative to full fine-tuning for resource-constrained continued pre-training of LLMs. The diagnostic framework and controlled isolation of allocation effects could reduce compute costs while guiding hybrid model construction. The architecture-agnostic claim and empirical consistency across benchmarks are strengths that would make the contribution useful to the community.

major comments (2)

[§4] Experimental Setup and §4 (Controlled Trials): the manuscript supplies no details on model sizes, continued-pre-training dataset scales, training hyperparameters, or statistical significance tests for the reported gains on C-Eval and CMMLU. Without these, it is impossible to verify that layer allocation is the sole causal factor or that the outperformance is robust rather than an artifact of uncontrolled variables.
[§3] §3 (LayerTracer Framework): the precise implementation of task-execution localization and layer-sensitivity quantification is not specified (e.g., exact metrics, thresholds, or architectural assumptions). This undermines reproducibility of the diagnostic findings that justify the shallow-train/deep-freeze recommendation.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract and introduction should explicitly define all acronyms (C-Eval, CMMLU, LayerTracer) at first use and state the model/dataset scales used in the trials.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback, which identifies key areas for enhancing reproducibility and clarity. We will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested details on experimental setups and the LayerTracer framework.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§4] Experimental Setup and §4 (Controlled Trials): the manuscript supplies no details on model sizes, continued-pre-training dataset scales, training hyperparameters, or statistical significance tests for the reported gains on C-Eval and CMMLU. Without these, it is impossible to verify that layer allocation is the sole causal factor or that the outperformance is robust rather than an artifact of uncontrolled variables.

Authors: We agree that the current version lacks sufficient experimental details, which is a valid concern for verifying causality and robustness. In the revised manuscript, we will expand §4 with a dedicated experimental setup subsection specifying the exact model sizes (e.g., the LLMs employed), continued pre-training dataset scales and sources, all training hyperparameters (learning rates, batch sizes, epochs, optimizers), and statistical significance tests (such as paired t-tests or bootstrap confidence intervals with p-values) for the C-Eval and CMMLU gains. This will isolate the layer allocation effect and confirm the results are not artifacts of uncontrolled variables. revision: yes
Referee: [§3] §3 (LayerTracer Framework): the precise implementation of task-execution localization and layer-sensitivity quantification is not specified (e.g., exact metrics, thresholds, or architectural assumptions). This undermines reproducibility of the diagnostic findings that justify the shallow-train/deep-freeze recommendation.

Authors: We concur that precise implementation details are essential for reproducibility of the diagnostic findings. The revised §3 will fully specify the LayerTracer framework, including exact metrics for task-execution localization (e.g., representation similarity via cosine distance or activation divergence), the layer-sensitivity quantification formulas and any thresholds used, and architectural assumptions (e.g., handling of transformer blocks). We will also add pseudocode or a step-by-step algorithmic description to enable independent replication of the evolution pattern analysis and stability measurements that motivate the shallow-train/deep-freeze strategy. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper introduces LayerTracer as an independent diagnostic framework to analyze layer representations and stability, then uses the resulting empirical observations to design and run separate controlled continued-pretraining experiments on C-Eval and CMMLU. Performance differences are reported from these trials rather than from any fitted parameter, self-defined quantity, or self-citation chain that reduces the outcome to the input by construction. No equations appear, and the methodology remains falsifiable through external replication.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the empirical observation that deep layers are both task-critical and stable; this observation is treated as a domain finding rather than a derived quantity. No explicit free parameters or invented physical entities are introduced.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Layer-wise representations in transformer-based LLMs exhibit measurable evolution patterns and differential stability during continued pre-training.
Invoked to justify the design and interpretation of LayerTracer.

invented entities (1)

LayerTracer no independent evidence
purpose: Architecture-agnostic diagnostic framework for locating task execution and quantifying layer sensitivity
New tool proposed by the authors to generate the layer-allocation guidance.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5504 in / 1324 out tokens · 52524 ms · 2026-05-13T02:35:03.549753+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages · 18 internal anchors

[1]

Qwen2.5 Technical Report

Qwen2.5 technical report , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.15115 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[2]

Qwen2 Technical Report

Qwen2 technical report , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.10671 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[3]

Qwen3 Technical Report

Qwen3 technical report , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[4]

Qwen3.5 official repository , author=

work page
[5]

GPT-4 Technical Report

GPT-4 technical report , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[6]

LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models

LLaMA: Open and efficient foundation language models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[7]

Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models

LLaMA 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[8]

The Llama 3 Herd of Models

The LLaMA 3 herd of models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[9]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , pages=

Attention is all you need , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , pages=

work page
[10]

International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=

Mamba: Linear-time sequence modeling with selective state spaces , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=

work page
[11]

Transformers are SSMs: Generalized Models and Efficient Algorithms Through Structured State Space Duality

Transformers are SSMs: Generalized models and efficient algorithms through structured state space duality , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.21060 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[12]

International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=

Linear attention is (maybe) all you need (to understand transformer optimization) , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=

work page
[13]

Journal of Machine Learning Research , volume=

Switch transformers: Scaling to trillion parameter models with simple and efficient sparsity , author=. Journal of Machine Learning Research , volume=

work page
[14]

Jamba: A Hybrid Transformer-Mamba Language Model

Jamba: A hybrid transformer-mamba language model , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.19887 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[15]

International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=

Gated delta networks: Improving Mamba2 with delta rule , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=

work page
[16]

Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 1, Long Papers , publisher=

Distinguishing antonyms and synonyms in a pattern-based neural network , author=. Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 1, Long Papers , publisher=

work page
[17]

A Survey of Large Language Models

A survey of large language models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.18223 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[18]

Neural Computing and Applications , volume =

Abo El-Enen, Mohamed and Saad, Sally and Nazmy, Taymoor , title =. Neural Computing and Applications , volume =. 2025 , publisher =

work page 2025
[19]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.05652 , year=

Sugar-coated poison: Benign generation unlocks llm jailbreaking , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.05652 , year=

work page arXiv
[20]

IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , volume=

Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy , author=. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , volume=

work page
[21]

Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models

Scaling laws for neural language models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08361 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
[22]

Neural Chain-of-Thought Search: Searching the Optimal Reasoning Path to Enhance Large Language Models

Neural chain-of-thought search: Searching the optimal reasoning path to enhance large language models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.11340 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[23]

Computational Linguistics , volume=

Probing classifiers: Promises, shortcomings, and advances , author=. Computational Linguistics , volume=

work page
[24]

Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , pages=

Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic Structure , author=. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , pages=

work page
[25]

Computational Linguistics , volume=

Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advances , author=. Computational Linguistics , volume=

work page
[26]

Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 , pages=

Give Me the Facts! A Survey on Factual Knowledge Probing in Pre-trained Language Models , author=. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 , pages=

work page 2023
[27]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probing , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

work page
[28]

International Conference on Machine Learning , year=

Mechanistic Understanding of Alignment , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , year=

work page
[29]

Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024)

How Large Language Models Encode Context Knowledge? A Layer-Wise Probing Study , author=. Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024)

work page 2024
[30]

Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , year=

Analyzing LLMs’ Knowledge Boundary Cognition Across Languages Through the Lens of Internal Representation , author=. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , year=

work page
[31]

Locate, Steer, and Improve: A Practical Survey of Actionable Mechanistic Interpretability in Large Language Models

Locate, Steer, and Improve: A Practical Survey of Actionable Mechanistic Interpretability in Large Language Models , author=. 2601.14004 , archivePrefix=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[32]

2506.07240 , archivePrefix=

Overclocking LLM Reasoning: Monitoring and Controlling Thinking Path Lengths in LLMs , author=. 2506.07240 , archivePrefix=

work page arXiv
[33]

Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Computational Linguistics , year=

Linguistic Minimal Pairs Elicit Linguistic Similarity in Large Language Models , author=. Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Computational Linguistics , year=

work page 2025
[34]

Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , year=

LLM Already Knows Difficulty , author=. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , year=

work page 2025
[35]

Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) , pages=

Transformer feed-forward layers are key-value memories , author=. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) , pages=

work page
[36]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , pages=

Locating and editing factual associations in GPT , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , pages=

work page
[37]

Qwen Technical Report

Qwen technical report , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16609 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[38]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , pages=

Finding neurons in a haystack: Case studies with sparse probing , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , pages=

work page
[39]

International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , pages=

Similarity of neural network representations revisited , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , pages=

work page
[40]

Findings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP Findings) , pages=

A survey on the robustness of large language models , author=. Findings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP Findings) , pages=

work page
[41]

International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=

Mass editing memory in a transformer , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=

work page
[42]

International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=

Linearity of relation decoding in transformer language models , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year=

work page
[43]

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) , pages=

What do probes actually probe? On the role of surface statistics in linguistic probing , author=. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) , pages=

work page
[44]

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) , pages=

Layer-wise analysis of knowledge distillation in large language models , author=. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) , pages=

work page
[45]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.14346 , year=

Disc-medllm: Bridging general large language models and real-world medical consultation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.14346 , year=

work page arXiv
[46]

Meditron-70b: Scaling medical pretraining for large language models,

Meditron-70b: Scaling medical pretraining for large language models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.16079 , year=

work page arXiv
[47]

Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Code

Code llama: Open foundation models for code , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12950 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[48]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.09774 , year=

Huatuogpt-ii, one-stage training for medical adaption of llms , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.09774 , year=

work page arXiv
[49]

Findings of the association for computational linguistics: acl 2024 , year=

Biomistral: A collection of open-source pretrained large language models for medical domains , author=. Findings of the association for computational linguistics: acl 2024 , year=

work page 2024
[50]

LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models

LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models , author=. 2106.09685 , archivePrefix=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[51]

Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models via Deconvolution in Subspace

Zhang, Jia-Chen and Xiong, Yu-Jie and Xia, Chun-Ming and Zhu, Dong-Hai and Qiu, Xi-He. Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models via Deconvolution in Subspace. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 2025

work page 2025
[52]

Adaptive Budget Allocation for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning , author=. 2023

work page 2023
[53]

Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms

Proximal policy optimization algorithms , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[54]

Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

Direct preference optimization: Your language model is secretly a reward model , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

work page
[55]

Nature , volume=

DeepSeek-R1 incentivizes reasoning in LLMs through reinforcement learning , author=. Nature , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

work page 2025
[56]

Group Sequence Policy Optimization

Group sequence policy optimization , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.18071 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[57]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Models , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

work page
[58]

Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics

CMMLU : Measuring massive multitask language understanding in C hinese. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2024

work page 2024
[59]

2024 , eprint=

CCI3.0-HQ: a large-scale Chinese dataset of high quality designed for pre-training large language models , author=. 2024 , eprint=

work page 2024