arxiv: 2605.12033 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Quantumness of top quark pairs produced at LHC within SMEFT framework

Amir Subba , Yu Shi

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 05:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph

keywords quantum entanglementtop quark pairsSMEFTLHCspin density matrixquantum discordBell parameterdipole operators

0 comments

The pith

Quantum information measures from top-antitop spin states at the LHC distinguish effects of different anomalous top-quark couplings within SMEFT.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reconstructs the spin density matrix of top-antitop pairs from the angular distributions of their decay leptons in proton collisions at 13 TeV. It then computes three quantum information quantities—entanglement via concurrence, geometric quantum discord, and the Bell parameter—across mass bins and in the presence of dimension-6 operators that generate anomalous dipole moments. In the Standard Model these quantities show entanglement only near threshold while discord persists throughout phase space. The operators produce characteristic deformations: chromo-dipole terms shift the observables asymmetrically or mildly symmetrically near threshold, the CP-even weak dipole causes the largest change, and certain axial-vector couplings leave the quantities untouched. This establishes the quantities as a probe that separates CP-even from CP-odd structures in the effective theory.

Core claim

The ttbar spin density matrix in the k-r-n helicity basis, reconstructed from lepton angles, yields quantum entanglement that appears only near threshold in the Standard Model, geometric quantum discord that remains nonzero across all masses, and a Bell parameter that never violates the inequality. Dimension-6 SMEFT operators that induce chromo-dipole moments modify these observables primarily near threshold, with the magnetic moment operator producing asymmetric shifts and the electric dipole operator a milder symmetric response; among weak-dipole operators the CP-even vector coupling generates the largest deformation while the axial-vector differences leave the quantum information measures

What carries the argument

The ttbar spin density matrix in the k-r-n helicity basis, from which concurrence-based entanglement, geometric quantum discord, and the Bell parameter are derived after modification by SMEFT dimension-6 dipole operators.

If this is right

Quantum entanglement appears only near threshold while geometric discord remains nonzero across the full phase space even for separable states.
Anomalous chromo-dipole interactions modify the observables primarily near threshold with asymmetric shifts from the magnetic moment term and mild symmetric response from the electric dipole term.
The CP-even weak-dipole coupling produces the largest deformation of the quantum information quantities while axial-vector differences leave them unchanged.
These observables supply complementary sensitivity to CP-even and CP-odd operator structures beyond what conventional cross sections or asymmetries provide.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Experimental extraction of these spin-based quantities at the LHC could furnish independent bounds on top-quark dipole coefficients that are not fully captured by rate measurements alone.
The same reconstruction technique could be applied to other heavy-fermion pairs to test whether quantum correlations persist at higher energy scales.
Higher-statistics data sets would allow finer mass binning to isolate the threshold region where operator effects are strongest.
Absence of Bell violation combined with nonzero discord suggests that collider spin states occupy an intermediate regime between classical and fully nonlocal quantum behavior.

Load-bearing premise

The joint angular distribution of final-state charged leptons accurately encodes the ttbar spin density matrix as modified by the dimension-6 SMEFT operators.

What would settle it

A measurement in the lowest ttbar mass bin that finds identical values of concurrence and geometric discord whether or not the chromo-dipole coefficients are set to their experimental bounds would falsify the predicted operator-induced deformations.

read the original abstract

Top and anti-top quark pair production at LHC provides a unique setting to probe non-classical correlations at the TeV scale. We study quantum information (QI) properties of the $t\bar{t}$ spin state in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV within the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT), focusing on dimension-6 operators that induce anomalous chromo- and weak dipole moments of the top quark within their current experimental bounds. The $t\bar{t}$ spin density matrix is reconstructed from the joint angular distribution of the final state charged leptons in the $k$-$r$-$n$ helicity basis. We analyze three complementary QI quantities: concurrence-based quantum entanglement (QE), geometric quantum discord (GQD), and the Bell parameter,across four $t\bar{t}$ invariant-mass bins. Within the Standard Model (SM), non-vanishing QE appears only near threshold ($m_{t\bar{t}}\lesssim 400$ GeV), while GQD remains nonzero across the full phase space, indicating persistent non-classical correlations even for separable states. Anomalous chromo-dipole interactions modify these observables primarily near threshold: $\hat{\mu}_t$ induces asymmetric shifts, whereas $\hat{d}_t$ produces a mild symmetric response without Bell inequality violation. Among weak dipole operators, the CP-even coupling $C_2^V$ generates the largest deformation of the QI observables, while $\Delta C_1^{A,V}$ leave them unchanged. These results demonstrate that QI observables derived from the $t\bar{t}$ spin density matrix provide a complementary probe of anomalous top-quark interactions with distinct sensitivity to CP-even and CP-odd operator structures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Applies QI measures to SMEFT ttbar spin states but the lepton-angle reconstruction likely mixes production and decay for the weak-dipole operators.

read the letter

Colleague, the core of this paper is taking concurrence, geometric quantum discord, and the Bell parameter and computing them for ttbar pairs produced at 13 TeV when a few dimension-6 SMEFT dipole operators are switched on inside current bounds. They reconstruct the spin density matrix from the joint lepton angles in the k-r-n basis, split into four mass bins, and show how the observables shift relative to the SM. In the SM they recover entanglement only near threshold while discord stays nonzero; the chromo-dipole operators move the numbers asymmetrically near threshold, C2^V produces the largest deformation, and the CP-odd weak operator leaves them almost unchanged. That pattern is new for this specific set of operators and observables. The calculations are systematic and the SM baseline is handled cleanly. The soft spot is exactly the one flagged in the stress-test note. The weak-dipole operators also enter the top decay vertex, so the lepton angular distributions contain extra terms that cannot be absorbed into a pure production-level 4x4 density matrix. The paper proceeds as if the standard reconstruction still isolates the production spin correlations for all operators considered. That assumption is not obviously valid for C2^V and Delta C1^{A,V}, which undercuts the claim of clean, distinct sensitivity to CP-even versus CP-odd structures. It is a real but fixable limitation rather than a fatal flaw. The work is aimed at people already thinking about quantum information at colliders or looking for complementary handles on top SMEFT operators. It shows clear engagement with the literature and reproducible steps on the SM side. I would send it to a serious referee to check the decay contributions and the numerical stability of the QI quantities, rather than desk-rejecting it.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies quantum information properties of ttbar spin states in pp collisions at 13 TeV within SMEFT, focusing on dimension-6 operators inducing anomalous chromo- and weak dipole moments of the top quark. It reconstructs the ttbar spin density matrix from the joint angular distribution of final-state charged leptons in the k-r-n helicity basis, then computes concurrence (QE), geometric quantum discord (GQD), and the Bell parameter across four ttbar invariant-mass bins. SM results show QE only near threshold while GQD is nonzero throughout; anomalous operators produce distinct modifications, with hat mu_t causing asymmetric shifts, hat d_t mild symmetric response, C2^V the largest deformation, and Delta C1^{A,V} leaving observables unchanged, demonstrating complementary sensitivity to CP-even versus CP-odd structures.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work supplies a concrete, falsifiable set of QI-based observables that differentiate CP-even and CP-odd SMEFT operators in a manner orthogonal to standard cross-section or asymmetry measurements. The explicit numerical evaluation in mass bins, use of current experimental bounds on the couplings, and identification of threshold enhancement constitute genuine strengths that could guide future LHC analyses.

major comments (1)

[Methods / spin-density-matrix reconstruction] The reconstruction of the ttbar spin density matrix from dilepton angles (described in the methods section following the abstract) assumes SM-like decay matrix elements, so that the angular distribution is fully determined by the production-level density matrix modified by SMEFT operators. For the weak-dipole operators C2^V and Delta C1^{A,V}, however, the same dimension-6 operators also enter the t -> bW -> bl nu vertex. This introduces additional terms in the lepton angular distribution that cannot be absorbed into a redefinition of the 4x4 production density matrix in the k-r-n basis, mixing production and decay effects and thereby weakening the claimed distinct sensitivity to CP-even versus CP-odd structures for those operators.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states that operators are considered 'within their current experimental bounds' but does not list the numerical intervals adopted or cite the specific LHC/ATLAS/CMS constraints used; this should be added explicitly, perhaps in a dedicated table or paragraph in the introduction.
[Introduction / operator definitions] Notation for the anomalous couplings (hat mu_t, hat d_t, C2^V, Delta C1^{A,V}) is introduced without an immediate equation reference; a short paragraph or equation block defining each operator and its relation to the SMEFT Lagrangian would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for highlighting this important technical point regarding the reconstruction of the ttbar spin density matrix. We address the major comment below and will incorporate clarifications into the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The reconstruction of the ttbar spin density matrix from dilepton angles (described in the methods section following the abstract) assumes SM-like decay matrix elements, so that the angular distribution is fully determined by the production-level density matrix modified by SMEFT operators. For the weak-dipole operators C2^V and Delta C1^{A,V}, however, the same dimension-6 operators also enter the t -> bW -> bl nu vertex. This introduces additional terms in the lepton angular distribution that cannot be absorbed into a redefinition of the 4x4 production density matrix in the k-r-n basis, mixing production and decay effects and thereby weakening the claimed distinct sensitivity to CP-even versus CP-odd structures for those operators.

Authors: We agree that the weak-dipole operators C2^V and Delta C1^{A,V} modify both production and decay vertices, so the lepton angular distributions receive contributions beyond a pure redefinition of the production spin density matrix. Our analysis modifies only the production-level 4x4 density matrix in the k-r-n basis while retaining SM decay matrix elements, which is a standard approximation in SMEFT studies of ttbar production when decay effects are subdominant. Within the tight experimental bounds on these couplings, the decay modifications are numerically small relative to production effects, preserving the observed distinct patterns (largest deformation from CP-even C2^V, no change from Delta C1^{A,V}). Nevertheless, the referee is correct that this approximation limits the precision of the claimed CP-even vs. CP-odd separation for the weak operators. We will revise the manuscript to explicitly state the SM-decay assumption, add a brief discussion of its validity and potential impact on the sensitivity claims, and note that a full production-plus-decay calculation would be a natural extension for future work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct SMEFT computation of spin density matrix and QI observables

full rationale

The derivation computes the ttbar spin density matrix from SMEFT-modified production amplitudes, reconstructs it via lepton angular distributions in the k-r-n basis, and evaluates concurrence, GQD, and Bell parameter as functions of the operator coefficients. None of these steps reduce by construction to the inputs; the QI quantities are standard definitions applied to an independently calculated 4x4 matrix. No self-citation is load-bearing, no fitted parameters are relabeled as predictions, and no ansatz or uniqueness theorem is smuggled in. The chain is self-contained and externally falsifiable against SM benchmarks and experimental bounds on the operators.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions in quantum field theory and effective field theory; no new entities postulated. Free parameters are external experimental bounds rather than fitted in this work.

free parameters (1)

SMEFT operator coefficients (e.g. hat mu_t, hat d_t, C_2^V, Delta C_1^{A,V})
Varied within current experimental bounds to study modifications; not fitted to new data in this work.

axioms (2)

standard math The t tbar spin density matrix can be reconstructed from the angular distributions of decay leptons in the helicity basis
This is a standard technique in top quark spin correlation studies.
domain assumption Dimension-6 operators in SMEFT capture the leading new physics effects on top quark dipole moments
Assumes higher-dimensional operators are negligible at LHC energies.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5605 in / 1369 out tokens · 45980 ms · 2026-05-13T05:17:50.260391+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The ttbar spin density matrix is reconstructed from the joint angular distribution of the final state charged leptons in the k-r-n helicity basis... concurrence C, GQD, Bell parameter
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/BranchSelection.lean branch_selection unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Anomalous chromo-dipole interactions modify these observables primarily near threshold: μ̂t induces asymmetric shifts, whereas d̂t produces a mild symmetric response

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 90 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

Grossman and I

Y. Grossman and I. Nachshon,Hadronization, spin, and lifetimes,JHEP07(2008) 016 [0803.1787]

work page arXiv 2008
[2]

Mahlon and S

G. Mahlon and S. J. Parke,Spin Correlation Effects in Top Quark Pair Production at the LHC,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 074024 [1001.3422]

work page arXiv 2010
[3]

Mahlon and S

G. Mahlon and S. J. Parke,Angular correlations in top quark pair production and decay at hadron colliders,Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 4886 [hep-ph/9512264]

work page arXiv 1996
[4]

Stelzer and S

T. Stelzer and S. Willenbrock,Spin correlation in top quark production at hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B374(1996) 169 [hep-ph/9512292]

work page arXiv 1996
[5]

Bernreuther and Z.-G

W. Bernreuther and Z.-G. Si,Top quark spin correlations and polarization at the LHC: standard model predictions and effects of anomalous top chromo moments,Phys. Lett. B 725(2013) 115 [1305.2066]

work page arXiv 2013
[6]

Bernreuther, D

W. Bernreuther, D. Heisler and Z.-G. Si,A set of top quark spin correlation and polarization observables for the LHC: Standard Model predictions and new physics contributions,JHEP12(2015) 026 [1508.05271]. [8]D0collaboration,Evidence for spin correlation int ¯tproduction,Phys. Rev. Lett.108 (2012) 032004 [1110.4194]. [9]ATLAScollaboration,Observation of s...

work page arXiv 2015
[7]

Shi,Chien-shiung wu as the experimental pioneer in quantum entanglement: A 2022 note,Modern Physics Letters A40(2025) 2530001 [2502.06458]

Y. Shi,Chien-shiung wu as the experimental pioneer in quantum entanglement: A 2022 note,Modern Physics Letters A40(2025) 2530001 [2502.06458]

work page arXiv 2022
[8]

Shi,The road of quantum entanglement: from einstein to 2022 nobel prize in physics, Chinese Journal of Nature44(2022) 455 [2602.14601]

Y. Shi,The road of quantum entanglement: from einstein to 2022 nobel prize in physics, Chinese Journal of Nature44(2022) 455 [2602.14601]

work page arXiv 2022
[9]

Shi,Historical origins of quantum entanglement in particle physics: C

Y. Shi,Historical origins of quantum entanglement in particle physics: C. s. wu, t. d. lee, c. n. yang and other predecessors,International Journal of Modern Physics A40(2025) 2546002 [2507.13582]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[10]

Ollivier and W

H. Ollivier and W. H. Zurek,Introducing Quantum Discord,Phys. Rev. Lett.88(2001) 017901 [quant-ph/0105072]

work page arXiv 2001
[11]

Datta, A

A. Datta, A. Shaji and C. M. Caves,Quantum Discord and the Power of One Qubit,Phys. Rev. Lett.100(2008) 050502 [0709.0548]

work page arXiv 2008
[12]

Wang et al.,Witnessing quantum resource conversion within deterministic quantum computation using one pure superconducting qubit,Phys

W. Wang et al.,Witnessing quantum resource conversion within deterministic quantum computation using one pure superconducting qubit,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 220501 [1806.05543]

work page arXiv 2019
[13]

Pirandola,Quantum discord as a resource for quantum cryptography,Sci

S. Pirandola,Quantum discord as a resource for quantum cryptography,Sci. Rep.4(2014) 6956 [1309.2446]

work page arXiv 2014
[14]

Dakić et al.,Quantum discord as resource for remote state preparation,Nature Phys.8 (2012) 666 [1203.1629]

B. Dakić et al.,Quantum discord as resource for remote state preparation,Nature Phys.8 (2012) 666 [1203.1629]

work page arXiv 2012
[15]

T. Han, M. Low, N. McGinnis and S. Su,Measuring quantum discord at the LHC,JHEP 05(2025) 081 [2412.21158]

work page arXiv 2025
[16]

Afik and J.R.M

Y. Afik and J. R. M. de Nova,Quantum Discord and Steering in Top Quarks at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 221801 [2209.03969]

work page arXiv 2023
[17]

Luo,Quantum discord for two-qubit systems,Phys

S. Luo,Quantum discord for two-qubit systems,Phys. Rev. A77(2008) 042303

work page 2008
[18]

A. Bera, T. Das, D. Sadhukhan, S. S. Roy, A. Sen(De) and U. Sen,Quantum discord and its allies: a review of recent progress,Rept. Prog. Phys.81(2017) 024001 [1703.10542]

work page arXiv 2017
[19]

Afik and J.R.M

Y. Afik and J. R. M. de Nova,Entanglement and quantum tomography with top quarks at the LHC,Eur. Phys. J. Plus136(2021) 907 [2003.02280]. [31]CMScollaboration,Observation of quantum entanglement in top quark pair production in proton–proton collisions at√s= 13TeV,Rept. Prog. Phys.87(2024) 117801 [2406.03976]. [32]ATLAScollaboration,Observation of quantum ...

work page arXiv 2021
[20]

Schrödinger,Probability relations between separated systems,Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society32(1936) 446

E. Schrödinger,Probability relations between separated systems,Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society32(1936) 446

work page 1936
[21]

H. M. Wiseman, S. J. Jones and A. C. Doherty,Steering, Entanglement, Nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox,Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007) 140402 [quant-ph/0612147]. – 25 –

work page arXiv 2007
[22]

Shi,High energy quantum teleportation using neutral kaons,Physics Letters B641 (2006) 75

Y. Shi,High energy quantum teleportation using neutral kaons,Physics Letters B641 (2006) 75

work page 2006
[23]

Shi and Y

Y. Shi and Y. Wu,Cp measurement in quantum teleportation of neutral mesons,European Physical Journal C55(2008) 477

work page 2008
[24]

Huang and Y

Z. Huang and Y. Shi,Extracting rephase-invariant CP and CPT violating parameters from asymmetries of time-ordered integrated rates of correlated decays of entangled mesons, European Physical Journal C72(2012) 1900

work page 2012
[25]

Shi,Exact theorems concerning CP and CPT violating inC=−1entangled state of pseudoscalar neutral mesons,European Physical Journal C72(2012) 1907

Y. Shi,Exact theorems concerning CP and CPT violating inC=−1entangled state of pseudoscalar neutral mesons,European Physical Journal C72(2012) 1907

work page 2012
[26]

Shi,Some exact results on CP and CPT violations in aC=−1entangled pseudoscalar neutral meson pair,European Physical Journal C73(2013) 2506

Y. Shi,Some exact results on CP and CPT violations in aC=−1entangled pseudoscalar neutral meson pair,European Physical Journal C73(2013) 2506

work page 2013
[27]

Huang and Y

Z. Huang and Y. Shi,CP and CPT violating parameters determined from the joint decays ofC= +1entangled neutral pseudoscalar mesons,Physical Review D89(2014) 016018

work page 2014
[28]

Shi and J.-C

Y. Shi and J.-C. Yang,Time reversal symmetry violation in entangled pseudoscalar neutral charmed mesons,Physical Review D98(2018) 075019

work page 2018
[29]

Shi and J.-C

Y. Shi and J.-C. Yang,Particle physics violating crypto-nonlocal realism,European Physical Journal C80(2020) 861

work page 2020
[30]

Shi and J.-C

Y. Shi and J.-C. Yang,Entangled baryons: violation of inequalities based on local realism assuming dependence of decays on hidden variables,European Physical Journal C80(2020) 116

work page 2020
[31]

Shi,Entanglement in relativistic quantum field theory,Physical Review D70(2004) 105001

Y. Shi,Entanglement in relativistic quantum field theory,Physical Review D70(2004) 105001

work page 2004
[32]

Y. Afik, Y. Kats, J. R. M. de Nova, A. Soffer and D. Uzan,Entanglement and Bell nonlocality with bottom-quark pairs at hadron colliders,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) L111902 [2406.04402]

work page arXiv 2025
[33]

Subba and R

A. Subba and R. Rahaman,On bipartite and tripartite entanglement at present and future particle colliders, 2024

work page 2024
[34]

Cheng, T

K. Cheng, T. Han and M. Low,Optimizing entanglement and Bell inequality violation in top antitop events,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 033004 [2407.01672]

work page arXiv 2025
[35]

J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra,Full quantum tomography of top quark decays,Phys. Lett. B855 (2024) 138849 [2402.14725]

work page arXiv 2024
[36]

A. J. Barr, M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli and L. Marzola,Quantum entanglement and Bell inequality violation at colliders,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.139(2024) 104134 [2402.07972]

work page arXiv 2024
[37]

J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra,A closer look at post-decayt¯tentanglement,Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 096027 [2401.10988]

work page arXiv 2024
[38]

Maltoni, C

F. Maltoni, C. Severi, S. Tentori and E. Vryonidou,Quantum detection of new physics in top-quark pair production at the LHC,JHEP03(2024) 099 [2401.08751]

work page arXiv 2024
[39]

Cheng, T

K. Cheng, T. Han and M. Low,Optimizing fictitious states for Bell inequality violation in bipartite qubit systems with applications to the tt¯system,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 116005 [2311.09166]. – 26 –

work page arXiv 2024
[40]

J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra,Postdecay quantum entanglement in top pair production,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 076025 [2307.06991]

work page arXiv 2023
[41]

J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra and J. A. Casas,Improved tests of entanglement and Bell inequalities with LHC tops,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 666 [2205.00542]

work page arXiv 2022
[42]

Aoude, E

R. Aoude, E. Madge, F. Maltoni and L. Mantani,Quantum SMEFT tomography: Top quark pair production at the LHC,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 055007 [2203.05619]

work page arXiv 2022
[43]

Afik and J.R.M

Y. Afik and J. R. M. de Nova,Quantum information with top quarks in QCD,Quantum6 (2022) 820 [2203.05582]

work page arXiv 2022
[44]

Severi, C.D.E

C. Severi, C. D. E. Boschi, F. Maltoni and M. Sioli,Quantum tops at the LHC: from entanglement to Bell inequalities,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 285 [2110.10112]

work page arXiv 2022
[45]

Fabbrichesi, R

M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini and G. Panizzo,Testing Bell Inequalities at the LHC with Top-Quark Pairs,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 161801 [2102.11883]

work page arXiv 2021
[46]

T. Han, M. Low and T. A. Wu,Quantum entanglement and Bell inequality violation in semi-leptonic top decays,JHEP07(2024) 192 [2310.17696]

work page arXiv 2024
[47]

Ehatäht, M

K. Ehatäht, M. Fabbrichesi, L. Marzola and C. Veelken,Probing entanglement and testing Bell inequality violation with e+e-→τ+τ- at Belle II,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 032005 [2311.17555]

work page arXiv 2024
[48]

T. Han, M. Low and Y. Su,Entanglement and Bell nonlocality inτ+τ − at the BEPC, JHEP10(2025) 217 [2501.04801]

work page arXiv 2025
[49]

Y.-C. Guo, T. Han, M. Low and Y. Su,Quantum Tomography of Fermion Pairs ine+e− Collisions: Longitudinal Beam Polarization Effects,2602.02719

work page arXiv
[50]

Fabbrichesi, R

M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini and E. Gabrielli,Constraining new physics in entangled two-qubit systems: top-quark, tau-lepton and photon pairs,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 162 [2208.11723]

work page arXiv 2023
[51]

Cheng, T

K. Cheng, T. Han and M. Low,Quantum tomography at colliders: With or without decays, Phys. Lett. B868(2025) 139675 [2410.08303]

work page arXiv 2025
[52]

Brandenburg, Z

A. Brandenburg, Z. G. Si and P. Uwer,QCD corrected spin analyzing power of jets in decays of polarized top quarks,Phys. Lett. B539(2002) 235 [hep-ph/0205023]

work page arXiv 2002
[53]

Boudjema and R

F. Boudjema and R. K. Singh,A Model independent spin analysis of fundamental particles using azimuthal asymmetries,JHEP07(2009) 028 [0903.4705]

work page arXiv 2009
[54]

Rahaman and A

R. Rahaman and A. Subba,Probing top quark anomalous moments in W boson associated single top quark production at the LHC using polarization and spin correlation,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 055027 [2306.06889]

work page arXiv 2023
[55]

Hill and W

S. Hill and W. K. Wootters,Entanglement of a pair of quantum bits,Phys. Rev. Lett.78 (1997) 5022 [quant-ph/9703041]

work page arXiv 1997
[56]

Dakić, V

B. Dakić, V. Vedral and Č. Brukner,Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Nonzero Quantum Discord,Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 190502 [1004.0190]

work page arXiv 2010
[57]

Piani,Problem with geometric discord,Phys

M. Piani,Problem with geometric discord,Phys. Rev. A86(2012) 034101 [1206.0231]

work page arXiv 2012
[58]

J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony and R. A. Holt,Proposed experiment to test local hidden variable theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.23(1969) 880. – 27 –

work page 1969
[59]

Horodecki, P

R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki and M. Horodecki,Violating Bell inequality by mixed spin-1/2 states: necessary and sufficient condition,Phys. Lett. A200(1995) 340

work page 1995
[60]

Buchmuller and D

W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler,Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation,Nucl. Phys. B268(1986) 621

work page 1986
[61]

Weinberg,Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes,Phys

S. Weinberg,Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes,Phys. Rev. Lett.43(1979) 1566

work page 1979
[62]

Fabbrichesi, M

M. Fabbrichesi, M. Pinamonti and A. Tonero,Limits on anomalous top quark gauge couplings from Tevatron and LHC data,Eur. Phys. J. C74(2014) 3193 [1406.5393]

work page arXiv 2014
[63]

Q.-H. Cao, B. Yan, J.-H. Yu and C. Zhang,A General Analysis of Wtb anomalous Couplings,Chin. Phys. C41(2017) 063101 [1504.03785]

work page arXiv 2017
[64]

Baumgart and B

M. Baumgart and B. Tweedie,A New Twist on Top Quark Spin Correlations,JHEP03 (2013) 117 [1212.4888]

work page arXiv 2013
[65]

Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian

B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek,Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian,JHEP10(2010) 085 [1008.4884]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2010
[66]

Krauss, S

F. Krauss, S. Kuttimalai and T. Plehn,LHC multijet events as a probe for anomalous dimension-six gluon interactions,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 035024 [1611.00767]

work page arXiv 2017
[67]

Hirschi, F

V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, I. Tsinikos and E. Vryonidou,Constraining anomalous gluon self-interactions at the LHC: a reappraisal,JHEP07(2018) 093 [1806.04696]

work page arXiv 2018
[68]

Goldouzian and M

R. Goldouzian and M. D. Hildreth,LHC dijet angular distributions as a probe for the dimension-six triple gluon vertex,Phys. Lett. B811(2020) 135889 [2001.02736]

work page arXiv 2020
[69]

Bardhan, D

D. Bardhan, D. Ghosh, P. Jain and A. M. Thalapillil,Towards constraining triple gluon operators through tops,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 115003 [2010.13402]

work page arXiv 2021
[70]

Dekens and J

W. Dekens and J. de Vries,Renormalization Group Running of Dimension-Six Sources of Parity and Time-Reversal Violation,JHEP05(2013) 149 [1303.3156]

work page arXiv 2013
[71]

Buckley, C

A. Buckley, C. Englert, J. Ferrando, D. J. Miller, L. Moore, M. Russell et al.,Global fit of top quark effective theory to data,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 091501 [1506.08845]

work page arXiv 2015
[72]

Zhang and S

C. Zhang and S. Willenbrock,Effective-Field-Theory Approach to Top-Quark Production and Decay,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 034006 [1008.3869]

work page arXiv 2011
[73]

J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra,A Minimal set of top anomalous couplings,Nucl. Phys. B812 (2009) 181 [0811.3842]

work page arXiv 2009
[74]

Ravina, E

B. Ravina, E. Simpson and J. Howarth,Observingt¯tZspin correlations at the LHC,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 809 [2106.09690]

work page arXiv 2021
[75]

J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, M. C. N. Fiolhais and A. Onofre,Top Effective Operators at the ILC,JHEP07(2012) 180 [1206.1033]

work page arXiv 2012
[76]

Röntsch and M

R. Röntsch and M. Schulze,Constraining Couplings of Top Quarks to the Z Boson intt+ Z Production at the LHC,JHEP07(2014) 091 [1404.1005]

work page arXiv 2014
[77]

Schulze and Y

M. Schulze and Y. Soreq,Pinning down electroweak dipole operators of the top quark,Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 466 [1603.08911]

work page arXiv 2016
[78]

J. I. Aranda, T. Cisneros-Pérez, J. Montaño, B. Quezadas-Vivian, F. Ramírez-Zavaleta and E. S. Tututi,Revisiting the top quark chromomagnetic dipole moment in the SM,Eur. Phys. J. Plus136(2021) 164 [2009.05195]. – 28 –

work page arXiv 2021
[79]

I. D. Choudhury and A. Lahiri,Anomalous chromomagnetic moment of quarks,Mod. Phys. Lett. A30(2015) 1550113 [1409.0073]

work page arXiv 2015
[80]

Bermudez, L

R. Bermudez, L. Albino, L. X. Gutiérrez-Guerrero, M. E. Tejeda-Yeomans and A. Bashir, Quark-gluon Vertex: A Perturbation Theory Primer and Beyond,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 034041 [1702.04437]

work page arXiv 2017

Showing first 80 references.