arxiv: 2605.13530 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI

Recognition: unknown

Towards Unified Surgical Scene Understanding:Bridging Reasoning and Grounding via MLLMs

Jincai Huang , Shihao Zou , Yuchen Guo , Jingjing Li , Wei Ji , Kai Wang , Shanshan Wang , Weixin Si

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 19:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AI

keywords surgical scene understandingmultimodal large language modelsinstrument-verb-target tripletssemantic segmentationphase recognitionunified reasoning and groundingCholecT45-Scene dataset

0 comments

The pith

SurgMLLM unifies high-level surgical reasoning and low-level visual segmentation inside one model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes SurgMLLM as a single framework that fine-tunes a multimodal large language model to jointly handle procedural phases, instrument-verb-target actions, and pixel-level segmentation of instruments and targets. It does this by generating structured reasoning tokens that are temporally aggregated into prompts for a segmentation network, all trained end-to-end under one objective. The goal is to replace the usual separate pipelines for reasoning and grounding with coherent, cross-task representations that stay consistent with clinical semantics. A new dataset extension, CholecT45-Scene, supplies the aligned triplet labels and mask annotations needed for joint evaluation. Experiments report gains on triplet recognition, phase recognition, and segmentation over prior methods.

Core claim

SurgMLLM fine-tunes an MLLM on surgical videos to produce structured interpretability reasoning tokens for phases, IVT triplets, and triplet-entity segmentation; these tokens are temporally aggregated and supplied as prompts to a segmentation network, with the full system trained end-to-end by coupling language-based reasoning losses and visual grounding losses.

What carries the argument

Structured interpretability reasoning tokens from the fine-tuned MLLM that are aggregated over time to serve as prompts for the segmentation network.

If this is right

Triplet recognition AP_IVT rises from 40.7 percent to 46.0 percent.
Phase recognition and instrument-target segmentation both exceed prior separate-task baselines.
End-to-end training couples language supervision with visual losses to enforce semantic consistency.
The framework produces clinically aligned scene representations usable for context-aware assistance.
A new dataset of 64,299 frames with aligned triplet and mask labels supports unified evaluation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same token-aggregation pattern could be tested on non-cholecystectomy procedures to check whether the unified objective transfers.
Real-time deployment would require measuring whether the added reasoning step still meets surgical frame-rate constraints.
If the tokens prove reusable, they might serve as input to downstream planning modules without retraining the segmentation head.

Load-bearing premise

The structured reasoning tokens produced by the MLLM can be temporally aggregated into prompts that reliably raise pixel-wise segmentation accuracy.

What would settle it

A controlled experiment showing that replacing the MLLM-derived prompts with random or empty prompts yields equal or higher segmentation accuracy on the same dataset would falsify the claim that the reasoning tokens drive the grounding improvement.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13530 by Jincai Huang, Jingjing Li, Kai Wang, Shanshan Wang, Shihao Zou, Wei Ji, Weixin Si, Yuchen Guo.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Overview of SurgMLLM. Given surgical videos, SurgMLLM first performs structured scene reasoning with an MLLM to predict workflow phases and IV T triplets, accompanied with triplet-entity [SEG] tokens as language-conditioned prompts. These prompts are temporally fused and inserted into SAM2 to decode pixel-level masks, thereby bridging high-level semantic reasoning and temporally consistent triplet-entity g… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: CholecT45-Scene Dataset Overview. Top: Compared with existing surgical datasets, our dataset provides comprehensive annotations including phases, triplets, and triplet-entity masks. Bottom: We visualize annotations in our dataset, presenting instrument and target mask overlays alongside reasoning narratives by Qwen3 [2]. and manual quality auditing to ensure reliability. In addition, we generate structure… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Qualitative comparison. We compare our SurgMLLM with SOTA methods including CurConMix [11] and SurgSAM2 [16]. Best viewed when zoomed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Surgical scene understanding is a cornerstone of computer-assisted intervention. While recent advances, particularly in surgical image segmentation, have driven progress, real-world clinical applications require a more holistic understanding that jointly captures procedural context, semantic reasoning, and precise visual grounding. However, existing approaches typically address these components in isolation, leading to fragmented representations and limited semantic consistency. To address this limitation, we propose SurgMLLM, a unified surgical scene understanding framework that bridges high-level reasoning and low-level visual grounding within a single model. Given surgical videos, SurgMLLM fine-tunes a multimodal large language model (MLLM) to support structured interpretability reasoning, which is used to jointly model phases, instrument-verb-target (IVT) triplets, and triplet-entity segmentation tokens. These tokens are then temporally aggregated and serve as prompts for a segmentation network, enabling accurate pixel-wise grounding of triplet instruments and targets. The entire framework is trained end-to-end with a unified objective that couples language-based reasoning supervision with visual grounding losses, promoting coherent cross-task learning and clinically consistent scene representations. To facilitate unified evaluation, we introduce CholecT45-Scene, extending CholecT45 dataset with 64,299 frames of pixel-level mask annotations for instruments and targets, aligned with existing triplet labels. Extensive experiments show that SurgMLLM significantly advances surgical scene understanding, improving the primary triplet recognition metric AP_IVT from 40.7% to 46.0% and consistently outperforming prior methods in phase recognition and segmentation. These results highlight the effectiveness of unified reasoning-and-grounding for reliable, context-aware surgical assistance.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

SurgMLLM adds a unified MLLM that ties reasoning tokens to segmentation prompts and ships a new annotated dataset, but the abstract leaves the key aggregation step and its isolated contribution unverified.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this work tries to close the gap between high-level surgical reasoning and pixel-level grounding in one model, using a fine-tuned MLLM whose output tokens get aggregated over time to prompt a segmentation head. They also release CholecT45-Scene, which adds 64k frames of instrument and target masks aligned to the existing triplet labels. That dataset extension alone is useful for the field. The reported lift on AP_IVT from 40.7% to 46.0%, plus gains on phase recognition and segmentation, looks like a step forward on the surface. The end-to-end training that mixes language supervision with grounding losses is a reasonable way to encourage consistency across tasks. What is missing is any concrete description of how the reasoning tokens are pooled or fused across frames, and there are no ablations that separate the effect of that bridge from the extra data or the base MLLM scale. Without those checks it is hard to know whether the claimed unification is doing the heavy lifting or whether the gains would appear from multi-task supervision on the new annotations alone. The paper is aimed at people working on computer-assisted interventions who already use triplet recognition or surgical segmentation; a reader who wants to build on the dataset or test similar joint objectives will find it worth reading. It is coherent enough on its own terms to go to peer review, though referees will need the architecture diagram, loss equations, and targeted ablations before the central claim can be taken as settled.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes SurgMLLM, a unified framework that fine-tunes an MLLM on surgical videos to generate structured interpretability reasoning tokens for phases, IVT triplets, and segmentation entities; these tokens are temporally aggregated to prompt a segmentation network for pixel-wise grounding of instruments and targets. The model is trained end-to-end with a combined language and visual grounding objective. The authors introduce CholecT45-Scene (64,299 frames with pixel masks aligned to triplet labels) and report an AP_IVT increase from 40.7% to 46.0% along with gains in phase recognition and segmentation over prior methods.

Significance. If the bridging mechanism is shown to be responsible for the gains, the work would advance surgical scene understanding by demonstrating that joint reasoning-grounding supervision yields more coherent representations than isolated task models. The release of CholecT45-Scene with aligned triplet and mask annotations is a concrete, reusable contribution that supports future multi-task benchmarks in the field.

major comments (2)

[Method overview / abstract] The description of temporal aggregation of reasoning tokens into segmentation prompts (mentioned in the abstract and method overview) provides no equations, pooling details, cross-frame attention mechanism, or embedding fusion procedure. This mechanism is load-bearing for the central claim that structured reasoning tokens improve pixel-wise segmentation beyond direct visual features.
[Experiments] No ablation studies isolate the contribution of the temporal aggregation step or the unified end-to-end objective to the reported AP_IVT gain (40.7% to 46.0%). Without such isolation, the improvement cannot be confidently attributed to the claimed reasoning-grounding bridge rather than dataset extension, MLLM scale, or multi-task supervision alone.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract refers to 'structured interpretability reasoning tokens' without specifying their format, vocabulary, or supervision signal; a brief definition or example would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and the positive assessment of the CholecT45-Scene dataset contribution. We agree that additional technical details and ablations are needed to strengthen the central claims. We will revise the manuscript to include explicit equations and descriptions for temporal aggregation as well as new ablation experiments that isolate the key components. Point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Method overview / abstract] The description of temporal aggregation of reasoning tokens into segmentation prompts (mentioned in the abstract and method overview) provides no equations, pooling details, cross-frame attention mechanism, or embedding fusion procedure. This mechanism is load-bearing for the central claim that structured reasoning tokens improve pixel-wise segmentation beyond direct visual features.

Authors: We agree that the current manuscript provides insufficient technical detail on this load-bearing component. In the revised version we will expand the method section with explicit equations for the temporal aggregation step, including the specific pooling operation across frames, the cross-frame attention mechanism used to relate reasoning tokens over time, and the embedding fusion procedure that converts the aggregated tokens into segmentation prompts. These additions will clarify how the structured reasoning tokens are intended to improve pixel-wise grounding relative to direct visual features alone. revision: yes
Referee: [Experiments] No ablation studies isolate the contribution of the temporal aggregation step or the unified end-to-end objective to the reported AP_IVT gain (40.7% to 46.0%). Without such isolation, the improvement cannot be confidently attributed to the claimed reasoning-grounding bridge rather than dataset extension, MLLM scale, or multi-task supervision alone.

Authors: We acknowledge that the present experiments do not isolate these contributions. In the revision we will add ablation studies that (1) disable temporal aggregation by using only per-frame reasoning tokens for prompting and (2) train the reasoning and grounding modules separately rather than end-to-end. These results will be reported alongside the main AP_IVT numbers to better attribute the observed gain from 40.7% to 46.0% to the bridging mechanism versus other factors such as dataset scale or model capacity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; empirical framework with held-out validation

full rationale

The paper introduces SurgMLLM as an end-to-end trained MLLM framework that produces reasoning tokens later aggregated as segmentation prompts, with all performance claims (AP_IVT 40.7% to 46.0%, phase recognition, segmentation) presented as results on the newly introduced CholecT45-Scene dataset. No equations, uniqueness theorems, or self-citations are invoked to derive the core gains; the improvements are reported as direct empirical outcomes on held-out frames. The temporal aggregation step is described at the architectural level but is not reduced to a fitted parameter or self-referential definition. This is a standard empirical ML contribution whose central claims remain independent of any circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on the domain assumption that MLLMs can be fine-tuned to output segmentation-useful tokens from surgical video reasoning; no explicit free parameters or new invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Multimodal large language models can be fine-tuned to produce structured reasoning outputs that serve as effective prompts for downstream segmentation networks.
Invoked when the paper states that reasoning tokens are temporally aggregated and used as prompts for the segmentation network.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5614 in / 1328 out tokens · 64869 ms · 2026-05-14T19:59:03.477521+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

[1]

Grounding Surgical Action Triplets with Instrument Instance Segmentation: A Dataset and Target-Aware Fusion Approach

Alabi, O., Wei, M., Budd, C., Vercauteren, T., Shi, M.: Grounding surgical action triplets with instrument instance segmentation: A dataset and target-aware fusion approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.00643 (2025)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[2]

Qwen3-VL Technical Report

Bai, S., Cai, Y., Chen, R., Chen, K., Chen, X., Cheng, Z., Deng, L., Ding, W., Gao, C., Ge, C., et al.: Qwen3-vl technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21631 (2025)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[3]

npj Digital Medicine (2025)

Carstens, M., Vasisht, S., Zhang, Z., Barbur, I., Reinke, A., Maier-Hein, L., Hashimoto, D.A., Kolbinger, F.R.: Artificial intelligence for surgical scene under- standing: a systematic review and reporting quality meta-analysis. npj Digital Medicine (2025)

work page 2025
[4]

Medical Image Analysis (2022)

Cerón, J.C.Á., Ruiz, G.O., Chang, L., Ali, S.: Real-time instance segmentation of surgical instruments using attention and multi-scale feature fusion. Medical Image Analysis (2022)

work page 2022
[5]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (2023)

Chen, T., Zhu, L., Deng, C., Cao, R., Wang, Y., Zhang, S., Li, Z., Sun, L., Zang, Y., Mao, P.: Sam-adapter: Adapting segment anything in underperformed scenes. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (2023)

work page 2023
[6]

Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling

Chen, Z., Wang, W., Cao, Y., Liu, Y., Gao, Z., Cui, E., Zhu, J., Ye, S., Tian, H., Liu, Z., et al.: Expanding performance boundaries of open-source multimodal models with model, data, and test-time scaling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.05271 (2024)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[7]

IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (2022)

Ding, X., Li, X.: Exploring segment-level semantics for online phase recognition from surgical videos. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (2022)

work page 2022
[8]

In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (2021)

Gao, X., Jin, Y., Long, Y., Dou, Q., Heng, P.A.: Trans-svnet: Accurate phase recognition from surgical videos via hybrid embedding aggregation transformer. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (2021)

work page 2021
[9]

In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer- Assisted Intervention (2024)

Gui, S., Wang, Z.: Tail-enhanced representation learning for surgical triplet recog- nition. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer- Assisted Intervention (2024)

work page 2024
[10]

Huang et al

Gui, S., Wang, Z., Chen, J., Zhou, X., Zhang, C., Cao, Y.: Mt4mtl-kd: A multi- teacherknowledgedistillationframeworkfortripletrecognition.IEEETransactions on Medical Imaging (2023) 10 J. Huang et al

work page 2023
[11]

In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (2025)

Jeon, Y., Shin, J., Park, S., Kim, B., Park, K., Oh, N., Jung, K.H.: Curcon- mix: A curriculum contrastive learning framework for enhancing surgical action triplet recognition. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (2025)

work page 2025
[12]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (2023)

Kirillov, A., Mintun, E., Ravi, N., Mao, H., Rolland, C., Gustafson, L., Xiao, T., Whitehead, S., Berg, A.C., Lo, W.Y., et al.: Segment anything. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (2023)

work page 2023
[13]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2024)

Lai, X., Tian, Z., Chen, Y., Li, Y., Yuan, Y., Liu, S., Jia, J.: Lisa: Reasoning seg- mentation via large language model. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2024)

work page 2024
[14]

Medical Image Analysis (2025)

Lan, M., Si, W., Yan, X., Li, X.: A new dataset and versatile multi-task surgical workflow analysis framework for thoracoscopic mitral valvuloplasty. Medical Image Analysis (2025)

work page 2025
[15]

IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement (2023)

Li, C., Li, Y., Liu, R., Wang, G., Lv, J., Jin, Y., Si, W., Heng, P.A.: Structural and pixel relation modeling for semisupervised instrument segmentation from surgical videos. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement (2023)

work page 2023
[16]

In: Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Workshop (2024)

Liu, H., Zhang, E., Wu, J., Hong, M., Jin, Y.: Surgical sam 2: Real-time segment anything in surgical video by efficient frame pruning. In: Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Workshop (2024)

work page 2024
[17]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2023)

Liu, H., Li, C., Wu, Q., Lee, Y.J.: Visual instruction tuning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2023)

work page 2023
[18]

In: The Thirty- ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (2025)

Liu, Y., Ma, Z., Pu, J., Qi, Z., Wu, Y., Shan, Y., Chen, C.W.: Unipixel: Unified object referring and segmentation for pixel-level visual reasoning. In: The Thirty- ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (2025)

work page 2025
[19]

Science Robotics (2025)

Long, Y., Lin, A., Kwok, D.H.C., Zhang, L., Yang, Z., Shi, K., Song, L., Fu, J., Lin, H., Wei, W., et al.: Surgical embodied intelligence for generalized task autonomy in laparoscopic robot-assisted surgery. Science Robotics (2025)

work page 2025
[20]

Medical Image Analysis (2023)

Nwoye, C.I., Alapatt, D., Yu, T., Vardazaryan, A., Xia, F., Zhao, Z., Xia, T., Jia, F., Yang, Y., Wang, H., et al.: Cholectriplet2021: A benchmark challenge for surgical action triplet recognition. Medical Image Analysis (2023)

work page 2023
[21]

Medical Image Analysis (2022)

Nwoye, C.I., Yu, T., Gonzalez, C., Seeliger, B., Mascagni, P., Mutter, D., Marescaux, J., Padoy, N.: Rendezvous: Attention mechanisms for the recognition of surgical action triplets in endoscopic videos. Medical Image Analysis (2022)

work page 2022
[22]

Journal of Computer Science and Technology (2026)

Pan, Y., Zou, S.H., Yang, J.W., Si, W.X., Zheng, W.M.: Surgical data science in time-critical contexts: A roadmap toward brain-inspired computing. Journal of Computer Science and Technology (2026)

work page 2026
[23]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2024)

Rasheed, H., Maaz, M., Shaji, S., Shaker, A., Khan, S., Cholakkal, H., Anwer, R.M., Xing, E., Yang, M.H., Khan, F.S.: Glamm: Pixel grounding large multimodal model. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2024)

work page 2024
[24]

In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations (2025)

Ravi, N., Gabeur, V., Hu, Y.T., Hu, R., Ryali, C., Ma, T., Khedr, H., Rädle, R., Rolland, C., Gustafson, L., et al.: Sam 2: Segment anything in images and videos. In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations (2025)

work page 2025
[25]

In: International Con- ference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (2023)

Sharma, S., Nwoye, C.I., Mutter, D., Padoy, N.: Surgical action triplet detection by mixed supervised learning of instrument-tissue interactions. In: International Con- ference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (2023)

work page 2023
[26]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.04001 , year=

Yuan, H., Li, X., Zhang, T., Sun, Y., Huang, Z., Xu, S., Ji, S., Tong, Y., Qi, L., Feng, J., et al.: Sa2va: Marrying sam2 with llava for dense grounded understanding of images and videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.04001 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025