pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.13584 · v1 · pith:EVIXW7PKnew · submitted 2026-05-13 · ⚛️ physics.optics · cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.stat-mech

Ghost State of Light

R. M. de Boer , C. Toebes , Jan Klars , S. R. K. Rodriguez This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 18:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.stat-mech
keywords ghost statesaddle-node bifurcationoptical cavitynonlinear response with memoryphase space bottlenecklong-lived non-stationary stateprethermalization
0
0 comments X

The pith

A single-mode optical cavity sustains a ghost state of light with lifetimes exceeding the photon lifetime by over ten orders of magnitude.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports the observation of a long-lived non-stationary state of light in a single-mode optical cavity, identified as the ghost of a saddle-node bifurcation. This ghost creates a bottleneck in phase space that traps the system for parametrically long times when a nonlinear response with memory steers trajectories away from the true attractor. The state appears as a plateau in the relaxation of cavity transmission and persists even under strong fluctuations. The work shows how the ghost lifetime scales with memory time and distance to the bifurcation, establishing minimal conditions for such extended non-stationary behavior.

Core claim

We report the observation of a long-lived non-stationary state of light in a single-mode optical cavity. The observed state is a ghost of a saddle-node bifurcation which creates a bottleneck in phase space. While such ghosts are known to exist, accessing them is challenging because it requires a mechanism that steers the relaxation pathway away from the true attractor and into the bottleneck where the ghost emerges. Here we identify such a mechanism, namely a nonlinear response with memory. Our experimental system leverages this mechanism, enabling us to observe ghost states with lifetimes exceeding the cavity photon lifetime by more than ten orders of magnitude, even in the presence of силь

What carries the argument

The ghost of a saddle-node bifurcation, which forms a bottleneck in phase space when accessed by a nonlinear response that possesses memory and steers trajectories into the bottleneck.

If this is right

  • Ghost lifetimes vary systematically with the memory time of the nonlinear response and the distance to the bifurcation.
  • The distribution of ghost lifetimes at fixed driving conditions shows scaling signatures.
  • The ghost state manifests as a plateau in cavity transmission relaxation dynamics that resembles prethermalization.
  • These parametrically long-lived non-stationary states remain observable even when strong fluctuations are present.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same memory-steering mechanism could generate long-lived transients in other driven nonlinear systems such as mechanical resonators or chemical oscillators near saddle-node points.
  • Controlling the memory time might allow deliberate extension or suppression of these bottlenecks for applications in optical delay lines or information storage.
  • The observed scaling in lifetime distributions may connect to universal statistics of critical slowing down near bifurcations in dissipative systems.

Load-bearing premise

The observed plateau in cavity transmission relaxation arises because memory in the nonlinear response steers trajectories into the phase-space bottleneck created by the ghost of the saddle-node bifurcation.

What would settle it

Recording cavity transmission relaxation curves with the memory removed from the nonlinear response and finding no extended plateau or lifetimes comparable to the photon lifetime would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13584 by C. Toebes, Jan Klars, R. M. de Boer, S. R. K. Rodriguez.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Experimental input (top, green curve) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Plateau duration as a function of distance from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Effective phase-space potentials at the start and end [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Region in parameter space where the cavity is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Force magnitude, in color, in the complex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report the observation of a long-lived non-stationary state of light in a single-mode optical cavity. The observed state is a ghost of a saddle-node bifurcation which creates a bottleneck in phase space. While such ghosts are known to exist, accessing them is challenging because it requires a mechanism that steers the relaxation pathway away from the true attractor and into the bottleneck where the ghost emerges. Here we identify such a mechanism, namely a nonlinear response with memory. Our experimental system leverages this mechanism, enabling us to observe ghost states with lifetimes exceeding the cavity photon lifetime by more than ten orders of magnitude, even in the presence of strong fluctuations. The ghost manifests as a plateau in the relaxation dynamics of the cavity transmission, reminiscent of prethermalization. We show how the ghost lifetime depends on the memory time and the distance to the bifurcation, and we observe signatures of scaling in the distribution of ghost lifetimes at fixed driving conditions. Our work establishes minimal conditions for realizing parametrically long-lived non-stationary states.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims to experimentally observe a long-lived non-stationary 'ghost' state of light in a single-mode optical cavity, arising as the ghost of a saddle-node bifurcation that creates a phase-space bottleneck. This state is accessed via a nonlinear response possessing memory, which steers relaxation trajectories into the bottleneck rather than the true attractor. The ghost manifests as a plateau in cavity transmission relaxation dynamics, with reported lifetimes exceeding the cavity photon lifetime by more than ten orders of magnitude even under strong fluctuations. The work further claims that the ghost lifetime scales with memory time and distance to the bifurcation, and presents signatures of scaling in the distribution of ghost lifetimes under fixed driving conditions, establishing minimal conditions for such parametrically long-lived states.

Significance. If the central experimental claims and their interpretation hold, the result would be significant for nonlinear optics and dynamical systems by providing a concrete, accessible realization of saddle-node ghost dynamics in a physical system. The extreme lifetime ratio (ten orders of magnitude) and the explicit dependence on memory time plus bifurcation distance would constitute a notable experimental benchmark for bottleneck phenomena, with the prethermalization analogy offering a bridge to broader concepts in nonequilibrium statistical mechanics. The identification of memory in the nonlinear response as the steering mechanism is a useful minimal condition that could guide future studies of long-lived transients.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3: the precise definition of the 'memory time' (e.g., whether it is the relaxation time of the nonlinear medium or a fitted parameter) should be stated explicitly with its experimental extraction method, as this quantity is central to the claimed scaling.
  2. [Figure 4] Figure 4 (or equivalent distribution panel): the reported scaling signatures in the ghost-lifetime distribution would be strengthened by an explicit comparison to the expected functional form from saddle-node ghost theory (e.g., the inverse-square-root divergence or exponential tail), including a quantitative fit statistic.
  3. [§2] §2: the cavity photon lifetime used as the reference for the ten-order-of-magnitude claim should be given with its measured value and uncertainty; without this, the ratio cannot be independently verified from the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their supportive summary and recommendation of minor revision. We appreciate the recognition of the experimental significance of the ghost-state observation and the role of memory in the nonlinear response.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; experimental observation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental measurements of cavity transmission relaxation showing a plateau whose lifetime scales with memory time and bifurcation distance. The central claim identifies the nonlinear response with memory as the steering mechanism based on the physical setup and observed dynamics, without any derivation step that defines the ghost lifetime from fitted parameters or reduces a prediction to an input by construction. Known saddle-node ghost phenomenology is invoked as background, but the extreme lifetime ratio and distribution signatures are presented as measured outcomes, not tautological outputs of the model.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard dynamical-systems knowledge of saddle-node ghosts plus an experimental nonlinear-optical setup; no free parameters or invented entities are identifiable from the abstract alone.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Saddle-node bifurcations produce ghost states that create bottlenecks in phase space
    Invoked to interpret the observed plateau as a ghost state.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5484 in / 1175 out tokens · 60761 ms · 2026-05-14T18:57:41.662874+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Goldenfeld,Lectures on phase transitions and the renormalization group(CRC Press, 2018)

    N. Goldenfeld,Lectures on phase transitions and the renormalization group(CRC Press, 2018)

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    W. H. Zurek, U. Dorner, and P. Zoller, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 105701 (2005)

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    Damski, The simplest quantum model supporting the kibble-zurek mechanism of topological defect produc- tion: Landau-zener transitions from a new perspective, Phys

    B. Damski, The simplest quantum model supporting the kibble-zurek mechanism of topological defect produc- tion: Landau-zener transitions from a new perspective, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 035701 (2005)

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    Dziarmaga, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition and relaxation to a steady state, Adv

    J. Dziarmaga, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition and relaxation to a steady state, Adv. Phys.59, 1063 (2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Navon, A

    N. Navon, A. L. Gaunt, R. P. Smith, and Z. Hadzibabic, Critical dynamics of spontaneous symmetry breaking in a homogeneous bose gas, Science347, 167 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    K. Du, X. Fang, C. Won, C. De, F.-T. Huang, W. Xu, H. You, F. J. G´ omez-Ruiz, A. Del Campo, and S.-W. Cheong, Kibble–zurek mechanism of ising domains, Nat. Phys.19, 1495 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    K. Lee, S. Kim, T. Kim, and Y.-i. Shin, Universal kibble–zurek scaling in an atomic fermi superfluid, Nat. Phys.20, 1570 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Nandkishore and D

    R. Nandkishore and D. A. Huse, Many-body localiza- tion and thermalization in quantum statistical mechan- ics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.6, 15 (2015)

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Col- loquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 021001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    Schreiber, S

    M. Schreiber, S. S. Hodgman, P. Bordia, H. P. L¨ uschen, M. H. Fischer, R. Vosk, E. Altman, U. Schneider, and I. Bloch, Observation of many-body localization of inter- acting fermions in a quasirandom optical lattice, Science 349, 842 (2015)

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    H. P. L¨ uschen, P. Bordia, S. Scherg, F. Alet, E. Alt- man, U. Schneider, and I. Bloch, Observation of slow dynamics near the many-body localization transition in one-dimensional quasiperiodic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 260401 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Morong, F

    W. Morong, F. Liu, P. Becker, K. Collins, L. Feng, A. Kyprianidis, G. Pagano, T. You, A. Gorshkov, and C. Monroe, Observation of stark many-body localization without disorder, Nature599, 393 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Berges, S

    J. Berges, S. Bors´ anyi, and C. Wetterich, Prethermal- ization, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 142002 (2004)

    work page 2004

  14. [14]

    Moeckel and S

    M. Moeckel and S. Kehrein, Interaction quench in the hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 175702 (2008)

    work page 2008

  15. [15]

    F. H. L. Essler and M. Fagotti, Quench dynamics and relaxation in isolated integrable quantum spin chains, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp.2016(6), 064002

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Reimann and L

    P. Reimann and L. Dabelow, Typicality of prethermal- ization, Phys. Rev. Lett122, 080603 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    D. J. Luitz, R. Moessner, S. Sondhi, and V. Khemani, Prethermalization without temperature, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021046 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Pomeau and P

    Y. Pomeau and P. Manneville, Intermittent transition to turbulence in dissipative dynamical systems, Commun. Math. Phys.74, 189 (1980)

    work page 1980

  19. [19]

    S. H. Strogatz,Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engi- neering(Addison-Wesley, 1994)

    work page 1994

  20. [20]

    Sardany´ es, C

    J. Sardany´ es, C. Raich, and T. Alarcon, Noise-induced stabilization of saddle-node ghosts, New J. Phys.22, 093064 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Canela, L

    J. Canela, L. Alsed` a, N. Fagella, and J. Sardany´ es, Dynamical mechanism behind ghosts unveiled in a map complexification, Chaos Solit. Fractals156, 111780 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    D. Koch, A. Nandan, G. Ramesan, I. Tyukin, A. Gor- ban, and A. Koseska, Ghost channels and ghost cy- cles guiding long transients in dynamical systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 047202 (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Zheng, P

    Z. Zheng, P. Beck, T. Yang, O. Ashtari, J. P. Parker, and T. M. Schneider, Ghost states underlying spatial and temporal patterns: How nonexistent invariant solutions control nonlinear dynamics, Phys. Rev. E112, 024212 (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Gimeno, A

    J. Gimeno, A. Jorba, and J. Sardany´ es, On the effect of time lags on a saddle-node remnant in hyperbolic repli- cators, Phys. A : Math. Theor.51, 385601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    Fucho-Rius, S

    M. Fucho-Rius, S. Maretvadakethope, `A. Haro, T. Alarc´ on, J. Sardany´ es, and R. P´ erez-Carrasco, Local nearby bifurcations lead to synergies in critical slowing down: The case of mushroom bifurcations, Phys. Rev. E111, 024213 (2025). 6

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Abouelela, M

    A. Abouelela, M. Turaev, R. Kramer, M. Janning, M. Kajan, S. Ray, and J. Kroha, Stabilizing open photon condensates by ghost-attractor dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 053402 (2025)

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    D. Koch, U. Feudel, and A. Koseska, Criticality gov- erns response dynamics and entrainment of periodically forced ghost cycles, Phys. Rev. E112, 014205 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    H. Su, D. Li, J. Duan, X. Zhang, Y. Yue, and C. Gre- bogi, Chaotic ghosts in systems with parameter drift: Delay and control critical transitions, Phys. Rev. E113, 044207 (2026)

    work page 2026

  29. [29]

    S. T. Trickey and L. N. Virgin, Bottlenecking phe- nomenon near a saddle-node remnant in a duffing os- cillator, Phys. Lett. A248, 185 (1998)

    work page 1998

  30. [30]

    J. Noh, P. Kim, and Y.-J. Yoon, Nonlinear shock isola- tion using the bottleneck phenomenon near a saddle– node ghost, Mech. Syst. Signal Process.223, 111889 (2025)

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    Z. Geng, K. Peters, A. Trichet, K. Malmir, R. Kolkowski, J. Smith, and S. Rodriguez, Universal scaling in the dynamic hysteresis, and non-markovian dynamics, of a tunable optical cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 153603 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Peters, Z

    K. Peters, Z. Geng, K. Malmir, J. Smith, and S. Ro- driguez, Extremely broadband stochastic resonance of light and enhanced energy harvesting enabled by mem- ory effects in the nonlinear response, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 213901 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Peters and S

    K. Peters and S. Rodriguez, Limit cycles and chaos in- duced by a nonlinearity with memory, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top.231, 247 (2022)

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    Braeckeveldt, K

    B. Braeckeveldt, K. Peters, B. Verdonschot, B. Maes, and S. Rodriguez, Memory-induced excitability in opti- cal cavities, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 023008 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    See Supplemental Material for details about the experi- mental thermal relaxation time, the scaling of the ghost lifetime withτ, and the ghost lifetime distributions un- der the influence of noise

    work page

  36. [36]

    Carusotto and C

    I. Carusotto and C. Ciuti, Quantum fluids of light, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 299 (2013)

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    Casteels, R

    W. Casteels, R. Fazio, and C. Ciuti, Critical dynamical properties of a first-order dissipative phase transition, Phys. Rev. A95, 012128 (2017)

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    S. R. K. Rodriguez, W. Casteels, F. Storme, N. Car- lon Zambon, I. Sagnes, L. Le Gratiet, E. Galopin, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, A. Amo, C. Ciuti, and J. Bloch, Prob- ing a dissipative phase transition via dynamical optical hysteresis, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 247402 (2017)

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    Biondi, G

    M. Biondi, G. Blatter, H. E. T¨ ureci, and S. Schmidt, Nonequilibrium gas-liquid transition in the driven- dissipative photonic lattice, Phys. Rev. A96, 043809 (2017)

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    T. Fink, A. Schade, S. H¨ ofling, C. Schneider, and A. Imamoglu, Signatures of a dissipative phase transi- tion in photon correlation measurements, Nat. Phys.14, 365 (2018)

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    Nigro, D

    D. Nigro, D. Trypogeorgos, A. Gianfrate, D. Sanvitto, I. Carusotto, and D. Gerace, Supersolidity of polariton condensates in photonic crystal waveguides, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 056002 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    S. H. Strogatz and R. M. Westervelt, Predicted power laws for delayed switching of charge-density waves, Phys. Rev. B40, 10501 (1989)

    work page 1989

  43. [43]

    3 is slightly further away from the SNB than in Fig

    ∆ in Fig. 3 is slightly further away from the SNB than in Fig. 1, but still within the red circle in Fig. 2(a). ∆ was changed for illustration purposes only. Otherwise, infinitesimally close to the SNB (as in Fig. 1) the phase- space region of slow evolution is too small to be seen in Fig. 3

    work page

  44. [44]

    Redner, A first look at first-passage processes, Physica A Stat

    S. Redner, A first look at first-passage processes, Physica A Stat. Mech. Appl.631, 128545 (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    J. L. Doob, The brownian movement and stochastic equations, Ann. Math.43, 351 (1942)

    work page 1942

  46. [46]

    Beaulieu, F

    G. Beaulieu, F. Minganti, S. Frasca, V. Savona, S. Fe- licetti, R. Di Candia, and P. Scarlino, Observation of first-and second-order dissipative phase transitions in a two-photon driven kerr resonator, Nat. Commun.16, 1954 (2025)

    work page 1954

  47. [47]

    Jayesh Shah, P

    A. Jayesh Shah, P. Kirton, S. Felicetti, and H. Alaeian, Dissipative phase transition in the two-photon dicke model, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 173602 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    Vivas-Via˜ na, A

    A. Vivas-Via˜ na, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, and C. S. Mu˜ noz, Unconventional mechanism of virtual-state population through dissipation, Phys. Rev. A106, 012217 (2022)

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    Bibak, U

    F. Bibak, U. c. v. Deli´ c, M. Aspelmeyer, and B. Daki´ c, Dissipative phase transitions in optomechanical systems, Phys. Rev. A107, 053505 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    Miguel-Torcal, A

    A. Miguel-Torcal, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, F. J. Garc´ ıa- Vidal, and A. I. Fern´ andez-Dom´ ınguez, Multiqubit quantum state preparation enabled by topology opti- mization, Opt. quantum2, 371 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Cotrufo, A

    M. Cotrufo, A. Cordaro, D. L. Sounas, A. Polman, and A. Al` u, Passive bias-free non-reciprocal metasurfaces based on thermally nonlinear quasi-bound states in the continuum, Nat. Photon.18, 81 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    J. King, C. Wan, T. J. Park, S. Deshpande, Z. Zhang, S. Ramanathan, and M. A. Kats, Electrically tun- able VO2–metal metasurface for mid-infrared switching, limiting and nonlinear isolation, Nat. Photon.18, 74 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Barulin, O

    A. Barulin, O. Pashina, D. Riabov, O. Sergaeva, Z. Sadrieva, A. Shcherbakov, V. Rutckaia, J. Schilling, A. Bogdanov, I. Sinev, A. Chernov, and M. Petrov, Thermo-optical bistability enabled by bound states in the continuum in silicon metasurfaces, Laser Photonics Rev.18, 2301399 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Sanvitto and S

    D. Sanvitto and S. K´ ena-Cohen, The road towards po- laritonic devices, Nat. Mater.15, 1061 (2016)

    work page 2016

  55. [55]

    Kavokin, T

    A. Kavokin, T. C. Liew, C. Schneider, P. G. Lagoudakis, S. Klembt, and S. Hoefling, Polariton condensates for classical and quantum computing, Nat. Rev. Phys.4, 435 (2022)

    work page 2022

  56. [56]

    P. M. Walker, L. Tinkler, B. Royall, D. V. Skryabin, I. Farrer, D. A. Ritchie, M. S. Skolnick, and D. N. Krizhanovskii, Dark Solitons in High Velocity Waveg- uide Polariton Fluids, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 097403 (2017)

    work page 2017

  57. [57]

    Stepanov, I

    P. Stepanov, I. Amelio, J.-G. Rousset, J. Bloch, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, A. Amo, A. Minguzzi, I. Carusotto, and M. Richard, Dispersion relation of the collective excita- tions in a resonantly driven polariton fluid, Nat. Com- mun.10, 3869 (2019)

    work page 2019

  58. [58]

    Amelio, A

    I. Amelio, A. Minguzzi, M. Richard, and I. Carusotto, Galilean boosts and superfluidity of resonantly driven polariton fluids in the presence of an incoherent reser- voir, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023158 (2020). 7

    work page 2020

  59. [59]

    Estrecho, T

    E. Estrecho, T. Gao, N. Bobrovska, D. Comber-Todd, M. D. Fraser, M. Steger, K. West, L. N. Pfeiffer, J. Levinsen, M. M. Parish, T. C. H. Liew, M. Ma- tuszewski, D. W. Snoke, A. G. Truscott, and E. A. Ostrovskaya, Direct measurement of polariton-polariton interaction strength in the thomas-fermi regime of exciton-polariton condensation, Phys. Rev. B100, 03...

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    A. M. Grudinina and N. S. Voronova, Dark and thermal reservoir contributions to polariton sound velocity, Phys. Rev. B106, L121301 (2022)

    work page 2022

  61. [61]

    Vretenar, M

    M. Vretenar, M. Puplauskis, and J. Klaers, Mir- ror surface nanostructuring via laser direct writ- ing—characterization and physical origins, Adv. Opt. Mater.11, 2202820 (2023)

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    Kurtscheid, D

    C. Kurtscheid, D. Dung, A. Redmann, E. Busley, J. Klaers, F. Vewinger, J. Schmitt, and M. Weitz, Re- alizing arbitrary trapping potentials for light via direct laser writing of mirror surface profiles, EPL130, 54001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  63. [63]

    K. J. H. Peters and S. R. K. Rodriguez, Exceptional precision of a nonlinear optical sensor at a square-root singularity, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 013901 (2022)

    work page 2022

  64. [64]

    Kiesewetter, R

    S. Kiesewetter, R. Polkinghorne, B. Opanchuk, and P. D. Drummond, xspde: Extensible software for stochastic equations, SoftwareX5, 12 (2016)

    work page 2016

  65. [65]

    Peters, J

    K. Peters, J. Busink, P. Ackermans, K. Cogn´ ee, and S. Rodriguez, Scalar potentials for light in a cavity, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 013154 (2023). END MA TTER Appendix A: Experimental setup—The cavity is made by a planar and a concave distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) mirror, each with a peak reflectance of 99.9% at 530 nm. The DBRs of the planar and concave mi...

    work page 2023