arxiv: 2605.13867 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-02 · ⚛️ physics.geo-ph · astro-ph.EP

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Stochastic Resonance in a Thermally Driven Low-Dimensional Geodynamo Model

Giuseppina Nigro , Edoardo Cascio , Giuseppe Consolini , Francesco Berrilli

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 07:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.geo-ph astro-ph.EP

keywords geodynamostochastic resonancegeomagnetic reversalsalpha-effectpersistence timesmagnetic polaritylow-dimensional modelperiodic modulation

0 comments

The pith

Periodic modulation of the alpha-effect in a low-dimensional geodynamo model produces multi-peaked distributions of magnetic persistence times at integer multiples of the modulation period.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how slow periodic changes in the alpha-effect parameter affect the timing of magnetic field reversals in a simplified thermally driven geodynamo model. It shows that this modulation leads to a probability distribution for the durations between reversals that has peaks at multiples of the modulation time scale, resembling stochastic resonance. This mechanism offers a way to understand the wide range of observed geomagnetic reversal intervals, from short to very long superchrons, as organized by an external periodic driver rather than being purely random.

Core claim

The modulation generates a multipeaked probability density function of magnetic persistence times, with local maxima occurring at approximately integer multiples of the modulation timescale, as expected in a stochastic-resonance-like regime. The peak positions follow an approximately linear dependence on their index, showing that the characteristic timescales selected by the system are set by the imposed modulation period.

What carries the argument

A thermally driven low-dimensional geodynamo model with slow periodic modulation applied to the alpha-effect parameter, which governs large-scale magnetic induction.

If this is right

The characteristic timescales of polarity persistence are directly determined by the period of the imposed modulation.
This provides a numerical framework where slow modulation organizes reversal statistics through stochastic-resonance-like dynamics.
Reversal sequences can exhibit preferred durations at integer multiples of an underlying modulation timescale.
The broad variability in geomagnetic reversal times can arise from periodic forcing on dynamo control parameters.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the real geodynamo experiences similar slow modulations from mantle convection or orbital effects, it could explain clustered reversals or superchrons.
Observations of reversal time distributions might reveal hidden periodicities corresponding to long-term geophysical cycles.
Extending the model to higher dimensions or more realistic forcings could test whether the resonance effect persists.

Load-bearing premise

That the chosen low-dimensional thermally driven model and the imposed periodic modulation of the alpha-effect are representative enough of the real geodynamo to produce comparable reversal statistics.

What would settle it

Finding that real geomagnetic reversal persistence time distributions lack peaks at integer multiples of any plausible long-term modulation period, such as those related to mantle dynamics or orbital variations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13867 by Edoardo Cascio, Francesco Berrilli, Giuseppe Consolini, Giuseppina Nigro.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Time series of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Probability density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. The features of a stochastic resonance process emerg [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. When the modulation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Peak times [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Geomagnetic field reversal sequences exhibit persistence times spanning a broad range, from a few $10^4$ years to superchrons lasting more than $10^7$ years. Despite extensive observational and theoretical work, the physical mechanisms governing how such reversals occur and how their broad temporal variability is organized are still not fully understood. Here we investigate the temporal variability of geomagnetic polarity in a thermally driven low-dimensional geodynamo model subject to a slow periodic modulation of the control parameter governing the large-scale induction, namely the $\alpha$-effect parameter. We find that the modulation generates a multipeaked probability density function of magnetic persistence times, with local maxima occurring at approximately integer multiples of the modulation timescale, as expected in a stochastic-resonance-like regime. The peak positions follow an approximately linear dependence on their index, showing that the characteristic timescales selected by the system are set by the imposed modulation period. These results provide a physically motivated numerical framework in which slow modulation of a geodynamo control parameter can organize reversal statistics through stochastic-resonance-like dynamics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This low-dim model shows slow alpha modulation producing multi-peaked reversal persistence times at multiples of the drive period, but the stochastic resonance label needs explicit noise checks to hold.

read the letter

The paper's core result is that a slow periodic modulation of the alpha-effect parameter in their thermally driven low-dimensional geodynamo model produces a multi-peaked PDF for polarity persistence times, with the peaks sitting near integer multiples of the modulation timescale and following a roughly linear relation with index. That numerical outcome is the concrete new piece: it gives one mechanism by which a single control parameter variation can select a discrete set of long timescales in reversal statistics without invoking separate processes for each range. The setup is straightforward enough that the pattern emerges cleanly from the numerics, which is useful for anyone building reduced models of dynamo behavior. The authors are careful to frame it as a framework rather than a direct Earth simulation, which keeps the claim proportionate. The low-dimensional choice lets them run long integrations and scan parameters without the cost of full MHD, and the reported linear peak scaling is a clear, falsifiable signature tied to the imposed period. That part of the work is solid on its own terms. The main soft spot is the stochastic resonance interpretation. The abstract and stress-test note both leave open whether the peaks actually require the noise to be tuned to an optimal intensity or whether they appear from the periodic drive alone. If the full paper does not include explicit runs that vary noise amplitude and show the peaks weaken or vanish off the resonance condition, the mechanism claim rests on the pattern matching expectations rather than on a direct test. The low-dimensional model is also a limitation by construction; it cannot capture the full spatial structure or multiple dynamo modes that real reversals likely involve, so any mapping to observed superchrons or short reversals stays suggestive. The paper supplies no parameter tables or integration details in the abstract, but the full text presumably fills those in. This is the kind of targeted numerical experiment that belongs in the geodynamo and paleomagnetism literature. Readers who work with reduced models or reversal timing statistics will find the timescale selection result worth looking at, even if they end up disagreeing with how far it generalizes. It is coherent enough and grounded enough in a forward experiment to deserve peer review, provided the noise-dependence checks are present or added. I would bring it to a reading group to walk through the equations and the noise scans.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents numerical experiments on a low-dimensional thermally driven geodynamo model in which the α-effect parameter is subjected to slow periodic modulation. The central finding is that this modulation produces a multi-peaked probability density function for the persistence times of the magnetic polarity, with peaks located at approximately integer multiples of the modulation period. This is interpreted as evidence for stochastic-resonance-like dynamics that organize the reversal statistics according to the imposed timescale.

Significance. If the numerical results are robust, this work provides a physically motivated mechanism by which slow variations in geodynamo control parameters can select characteristic timescales for polarity intervals, including long superchrons. It extends the application of stochastic resonance concepts to geomagnetic field reversals and offers a testable framework for comparing model statistics with paleomagnetic observations.

major comments (1)

[§4] §4 (numerical results): The attribution to a stochastic-resonance-like regime requires explicit checks that the multi-peaked structure depends on the noise intensity being near an optimal value. The manuscript does not report experiments varying the thermal noise amplitude to demonstrate that the peaks weaken or vanish outside this range, nor that the periodic modulation is sub-threshold in the deterministic limit. Without these, the periodicity could arise solely from the imposed forcing rather than noise-assisted resonance.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: The abstract would benefit from a brief mention of the model equations, key parameter values, and the specific modulation period used, to allow readers to better contextualize the findings without immediate reference to the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of our work and for the constructive major comment. We address it point by point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§4] §4 (numerical results): The attribution to a stochastic-resonance-like regime requires explicit checks that the multi-peaked structure depends on the noise intensity being near an optimal value. The manuscript does not report experiments varying the thermal noise amplitude to demonstrate that the peaks weaken or vanish outside this range, nor that the periodic modulation is sub-threshold in the deterministic limit. Without these, the periodicity could arise solely from the imposed forcing rather than noise-assisted resonance.

Authors: We agree that explicit verification of the noise dependence is required to substantiate the stochastic-resonance interpretation. In the revised manuscript we will add a new set of experiments in §4 in which the thermal noise amplitude is systematically varied while keeping the modulation period and amplitude fixed. These runs will demonstrate that the multi-peaked structure in the persistence-time PDF is most pronounced at an intermediate noise level and weakens or disappears both for substantially lower and higher noise intensities. We will also include the deterministic (zero-noise) limit to confirm that the imposed modulation is sub-threshold and does not by itself generate the observed periodicity. These additions will directly address the possibility that the peaks arise solely from the deterministic forcing. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: forward numerical experiment with emergent statistics

full rationale

The paper describes a forward numerical integration of a low-dimensional thermally driven geodynamo model in which a periodic modulation is imposed on the alpha-effect parameter. The reported multi-peaked persistence-time PDF and its alignment with integer multiples of the modulation period are direct simulation outputs, not quantities fitted to data or derived by re-arranging the governing equations into a self-referential form. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation, an ansatz smuggled from prior work, or a parameter that is both fitted and then re-labeled as a prediction. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained as an explicit computational experiment.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the low-dimensional model reduction and the assumption that periodic modulation of the alpha-effect is a physically plausible slow variation; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5493 in / 1224 out tokens · 58347 ms · 2026-05-15T07:24:26.996590+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

reduced dynamics … ˙b₁ = (μ − ηk₁²)b₁ − μ/B₀² b₁³ … U(b₁) = −(μ − ηk₁²)/2 b₁² + μ/(4B₀²) b₁⁴
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic.lean LogicNat recovery; 8-tick period unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

μ(t) = μ_c + μ_A tanh[3 sin(2πt/Tω)] … local maxima … at approximately integer multiples of the modulation timescale

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · 10 internal anchors

[1]

(see also [45]). The model equations (1), (4) and (2) are written in a dimensionless form, where we measure the velocity in terms of the free-fall velocity U = √ ˆαgL ∆ T and measure the magnetic ﬁeld in units of B0 = U , corresponding to the Alfv´ enic ﬁeld strength. Temperature, length and time are measured in units of ∆ T , L and the free-fall time ( L...

work page
[2]

b1 − µ B2 0 b3 1, (6) which can be recast as an overdamped relaxation in a Landau potential U (b1) deﬁned by ˙b1 = − dU/db 1, yield- 5 -1 0 1 1.5 200500 201000 201500 202000 202500 203000 b1(t) t 0 2 4 6 8 µ(t) FIG. 2. Time series of b1(t) (bottom panel) obtained in the simulation with parameters ν = χ = η = 10 − 4, ˜α = 0 . 5 and the time-dependent µ (t)...

work page
[3]

= B2 0 4µ ( µ − ηk2 1 ) 2 ≃ η ≪ 1 µ B2 0 4 (9) demonstrating that the barrier increases and/or de- creases with µ . In equation (3), the nonlinear coupling terms appear- ing in the ﬁrst two terms in the RHS generate ﬂuctuations that induce transitions between the wells; accordingly, we also reconstruct a data-driven pseudopotential from the stationary sta...

work page
[4]

09, consistent with the PDF-peak estimate δUpdf ≃

work page
[5]

We also report residence-time asymmetry, deﬁned as the fraction of samples with b1(t) > 0 versus b1(t) < 0, as an independent diagnostic of a possible preference for polarity

07. We also report residence-time asymmetry, deﬁned as the fraction of samples with b1(t) > 0 versus b1(t) < 0, as an independent diagnostic of a possible preference for polarity. Consistently, the residence-time fractions yield f− ≡ ⟨ I(b1 < 0)⟩ ≃ 0. 526, which means about 52.6% of the time the system is in the left well (i.e. b1 < 0) and f+ ≡ ⟨ I(b1 > 0...

work page 2000
[6]

Cox, Lengths of geomagnetic polarity intervals, Jour - nal Geophysical Research 73, 3247 (1968)

A. Cox, Lengths of geomagnetic polarity intervals, Jour - nal Geophysical Research 73, 3247 (1968)

work page 1968
[7]

Cande and D

S. Cande and D. Kent, Revised calibration of the geomag- netic polarity timescale for the late cretaceous and ceno- zoic, Journal of Geophysical Research 100, 6093 (1995)

work page 1995
[8]

Valet, L

J.-P. Valet, L. Meynadier, and Y. Guyodo, Geomagnetic dipole strength and reversal rate over the past two million years, Nature 435, 802 (2005)

work page 2005
[9]

Valet and A

J.-P. Valet and A. Fournier, Deciphering records of geomagnetic reversals, Reviews of Geophysics 54, 410 (2016)

work page 2016
[10]

J. E. T. Channell, D. A. Hodell, J. McManus, and B. Lehman, Orbital modulation of the Earth’s magnetic ﬁeld intensity, Nature 394, 464 (1998)

work page 1998
[11]

Yamazaki and H

T. Yamazaki and H. Oda, Orbital Inﬂuence on Earth’s Magnetic Field: 100,000-Year Periodicity in Inclination, Science 295, 2435 (2002)

work page 2002
[12]

T. Yamazaki, Long-term secular variation in geomagneti c ﬁeld inclination during Brunhes Chron recorded in sed- iment cores from Ontong-Java Plateau, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 133, 57 (2002)

work page 2002
[13]

Nakagawa and P

T. Nakagawa and P. J. Tackley, Deep mantle heat ﬂow and thermal evolution of the Earth’s core in thermochem- ical multiphase models of mantle convection, Geochem- istry, Geophysics, Geosystems 6, Q08003 (2005)

work page 2005
[14]

Consolini and P

G. Consolini and P. De Michelis, Stochastic resonance in geomagnetic polarity reversals, Physical Review Letters 90, 5 (2003)

work page 2003
[15]

S. C. Cande and D. V. Kent, Revised calibration of the geomagnetic polarity timescale for the late cretaceous and cenozoic, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 100, 6093 (1995)

work page 1995
[16]

T. J. Ahrens, Global earth physics: a handbook of physical constants, Vol. 1 (American Geophysical Union, 1995)

work page 1995
[17]

Benzi, A

R. Benzi, A. Sutera, and A. Vulpiani, The mechanism of stochastic resonance, Journal of Physics A: mathematical and general 14, L453 (1981)

work page 1981
[18]

Gammaitoni, P

L. Gammaitoni, P. H¨ anggi, P. Jung, and F. Marchesoni, Stochastic resonance, Reviews of modern physics 70, 223 (1998)

work page 1998
[19]

Lorito, D

S. Lorito, D. Schmitt, G. Consolini, and P. De Miche- lis, Stochastic resonance in a bistable geodynamo model, Astronomische Nachrichten 326, 227 (2005)

work page 2005
[20]

D. A. Ryan and G. R. Sarson, A coupled low order dy- namo/turbulent shell model for geomagnetic ﬁeld varia- tions and reversals, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 188, 214 (2011)

work page 2011
[21]

G. A. Glatzmaier and P. H. Roberts, A three-dimensional convective dynamo solution with rotating and ﬁnitely conducting inner core and mantle, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 91, 63 (1995)

work page 1995
[22]

Spherical convective dynamos in the rapidly rotating asymptotic regime

J. Aubert, T. Gastine, and A. Fournier, Spherical con- vective dynamos in the rapidly rotating asymptotic regime, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 813, 558 (2017), arXiv:1611.04776 [physics.geo-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[23]

Y. Lin, P. Marti, and A. Jackson, Invariance of dynamo action in an early-Earth model, Nature 644, 109–114 (2025)

work page 2025
[24]

Steenbeck and F

M. Steenbeck and F. Krause, On the Dynamo Theory of Stellar and Planetary Magnetic Fields. I. AC Dynamos of Solar Type, Astronomische Nachrichten 291, 49 (1969)

work page 1969
[25]

H. K. Moﬀatt, Magnetic ﬁeld generation in electrically conducting ﬂuids (1978)

work page 1978
[26]

F. H. Busse, Thermal instabilities in rapidly rotating sys- tems., Journal of Fluid Mechanics 44, 441 (1970)

work page 1970
[27]

Christensen, P

U. Christensen, P. Olson, and G. A. Glatzmaier, Numer- ical modelling of the geodynamo: a systematic param- eter study, Geophysical Journal International 138, 393 (1999)

work page 1999
[28]

Olson, U

P. Olson, U. Christensen, and G. A. Glatzmaier, Numeri- cal modeling of the geodynamo: Mechanisms of ﬁeld gen- eration and equilibration, J. Geophys. Res. 104, 10,383 (1999)

work page 1999
[29]

Mean-field concept and direct numerical simulations of rotating magnetoconvection and the geodynamo

M. Schrinner, K.-H. R¨ adler, D. Schmitt, M. Rheinhardt , and U. R. Christensen, Mean-ﬁeld concept and direct nu- merical simulations of rotating magnetoconvection and the geodynamo, Geophysical and Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics 101, 81 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0609752 [astro- ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[30]

R. K. Yadav, T. Gastine, U. R. Christensen, S. J. Wolk, and K. Poppenhaeger, Approaching a realistic force balance in geodynamo simulations, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 113, 12065 (2016), arXiv:1610.03107 [physics.geo-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[31]

Turbulent geodynamo simulations: a leap towards Earth's core

N. Schaeﬀer, D. Jault, H.-C. Nataf, and A. Fournier, Tur - bulent geodynamo simulations: a leap towards Earth’s core, Geophysical Journal International 211, 1 (2017), arXiv:1701.01299 [physics.geo-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[32]

Kono and P

M. Kono and P. H. Roberts, Recent geodynamo simula- tions and observations of the geomagnetic ﬁeld, Reviews of Geophysics 40, 4 (2002)

work page 2002
[33]

R. K. Yadav, T. Gastine, U. R. Christensen, L. D. V. Duarte, and A. Reiners, Eﬀect of shear and magnetic ﬁeld on the heat-transfer eﬃciency of convection in rotating spherical shells, Geophysical Journal International 204, 1120 (2016), arXiv:1507.03649 [astro-ph.EP]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[34]

Nigro, P

G. Nigro, P. Pongkitiwanichakul, F. Cattaneo, and S. M. Tobias, What is a large-scale dynamo?, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 464, L119 (2017)

work page 2017
[35]

C. A. Jones, A. W. Longbottom, and R. Hollerbach, A self-consistent convection driven geodynamo model, us- ing a mean ﬁeld approximation, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 92, 119 (1995)

work page 1995
[36]

Do spherical alpha^2-dynamos oscillate?

G. R¨ udiger, D. Elstner, and M. Ossendrijver, Do spher- 11 ical α 2-dynamos oscillate?, Astron. Astrophys. 406, 15 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0212203 [astro-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[37]

Oscillating \alpha^2-dynamos and the reversal phenomenon of the global geodynamo

A. Giesecke, G. R¨ udiger, and D. Elstner, Oscillating α 2- dynamos and the reversal phenomenon of the global geo- dynamo, Astronomische Nachrichten 326, 693 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0509286 [astro-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[38]

Asymmetric polarity reversals, bimodal field distribution, and coherence resonance in a spherically symmetric mean-field dynamo model

F. Stefani and G. Gerbeth, Asymmetric Polarity Rever- sals, Bimodal Field Distribution, and Coherence Res- onance in a Spherically Symmetric Mean-Field Dy- namo Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 184506 (2005), arXiv:physics/0411050 [physics.geo-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[39]

Why dynamos are prone to reversals

F. Stefani, G. Gerbeth, U. G¨ unther, and M. Xu, Why dynamos are prone to reversals, Earth and Planetary Science Letters 243, 828 (2006), arXiv:physics/0509118 [physics.geo-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[40]

Sorriso-Valvo, F

L. Sorriso-Valvo, F. Stefani, V. Carbone, G. Nigro, F. Lepreti, A. Vecchio, and P. Veltri, A statistical analy- sis of polarity reversals of the geomagnetic ﬁeld, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 164, 197 (2007)

work page 2007
[41]

The chromosphere: gateway to the corona, or the purgatory of solar physics?

G. Nigro and V. Carbone, Magnetic reversals in a mod- iﬁed shell model for magnetohydrodynamics turbulence, Phys. Rev. E 82, 016313 (2010), arXiv:1001.1001 [astro- ph.SR]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[42]

Nigro, A shell model for a large-scale turbulent dy- namo, Geophysical and Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics 107, 101 (2013)

G. Nigro, A shell model for a large-scale turbulent dy- namo, Geophysical and Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics 107, 101 (2013)

work page 2013
[43]

Nigro, An Argument in Favor of Magnetic Polarity Reversals Due to Heat Flux Variations in Fully Convec- tive Stars and Planets, The Astrophysical Journal 938, 22 (2022)

G. Nigro, An Argument in Favor of Magnetic Polarity Reversals Due to Heat Flux Variations in Fully Convec- tive Stars and Planets, The Astrophysical Journal 938, 22 (2022)

work page 2022
[44]

Nigro, F

G. Nigro, F. Berrilli, G. Bono, D. Del Moro, L. Giovan- nelli, V. Penza, and R. Reda, On the Temporal Variabil- ity in the Magnetic Dichotomy of Late M Dwarf Stars, Astrophys. J. 996, 98 (2026), arXiv:2511.12807 [astro- ph.SR]

work page arXiv 2026
[45]

E. B. Gledzer, System of hydrodynamic type admitting two quadratic integrals of motion, Soviet Physics Dok- lady 18, 216 (1973)

work page 1973
[46]

Ohkitani and M

K. Ohkitani and M. Yamada, Temporal Intermittency in the Energy Cascade Process and Local Lyapunov Anal- ysis in Fully-Developed Model Turbulence, Progress of Theoretical Physics 81, 329 (1989)

work page 1989
[47]

Pouquet, U

A. Pouquet, U. Frisch, and J. Leorat, Strong MHD helical turbulence and the nonlinear dynamo eﬀect, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 77, 321 (1976)

work page 1976
[48]

Frick and D

P. Frick and D. Sokoloﬀ, Cascade and dynamo action in a shell model of magnetohydrodynamic turbulence, Physi- cal Review E 57, 4155 (1998)

work page 1998
[49]

M. H. Jensen, G. Paladin, and A. Vulpiani, Shell model for turbulent advection of passive-scalar ﬁelds, Physical Review A 45, 7214 (1992)

work page 1992
[50]

Mingshun and L

J. Mingshun and L. Shida, Scaling behavior of velocity and temperature in a shell model for thermal convective turbulence, Physical Review E 56, 441 (1997)

work page 1997
[51]

Schmitt, M

D. Schmitt, M. A. J. H. Ossendrijver, and P. Hoyng, Mag- netic ﬁeld reversals and secular variation in a bistable geodynamo model, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 125, 119 (2001)

work page 2001
[52]

Freedman and P

D. Freedman and P. Diaconis, On the histogram as a density estimator: L2 theory, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Wahrschein- lichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete 57, 453 (1981)

work page 1981
[53]

A geomagnetic excursion is a transient episode charac- terized by a pronounced weakening of the geomagnetic ﬁeld, during which the ﬁeld may temporarily assume re- versed or anomalous directions, but ultimately returns to the original polarity without completing a full reversal

work page
[54]

To be more precise Nbins = len( τi), where the centers are generated as τi = τmin + (i − 1)δτ, being τi < τmax

work page
[55]

G. A. Glatzmaier, R. S. Coe, L. Hongre, and P. H. Roberts, The role of the Earth’s mantle in controlling the frequency of geomagnetic reversals, Nature 401, 885 (1999)

work page 1999
[56]

Olson and U

P. Olson and U. R. Christensen, The time-averaged magnetic ﬁeld in numerical dynamos with non-uniform boundary heat ﬂow, Geophysical Journal International 151, 809 (2002)

work page 2002
[57]

E. J. Garnero and A. K. McNamara, Structure and Dy- namics of Earth’s Lower Mantle, Science 320, 626 (2008)

work page 2008
[58]

Nakagawa and P

T. Nakagawa and P. J. Tackley, Eﬀects of low-viscosity post-perovskite on thermo-chemical mantle convection in a 3-D spherical shell, Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L04309 (2011)

work page 2011
[59]

Olson, Mantle control of the geodynamo: Conse- quences of top-down regulation, Geochemistry, Geo- physics, Geosystems 17, 1935 (2016)

P. Olson, Mantle control of the geodynamo: Conse- quences of top-down regulation, Geochemistry, Geo- physics, Geosystems 17, 1935 (2016)

work page 1935
[60]

P. L. Olson, R. S. Coe, P. E. Driscoll, G. A. Glatzmaier, and P. H. Roberts, Geodynamo reversal frequency and heterogeneous core–mantle boundary heat ﬂow, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 180, 66 (2010)

work page 2010
[61]

Driscoll and P

P. Driscoll and P. Olson, Superchron cycles driven by variable core heat ﬂow, Geophysical Research Letters 38, L09304 (2011)

work page 2011
[62]

A. J. Biggin, B. Steinberger, J. Aubert, N. Suttie, R. Holme, T. H. Torsvik, D. G. van der Meer, and D. J. J. van Hinsbergen, Possible links between long-term geo- magnetic variations and whole-mantle convection pro- cesses, Nature Geoscience 5, 526 (2012)

work page 2012
[63]

Olson, L

P. Olson, L. A. Hinnov, and P. E. Driscoll, Nonrandom geomagnetic reversal times and geodynamo evolution, Earth and Planetary Science Letters 388, 9 (2014)

work page 2014