pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.13995 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Ionization Structure and Metal Enrichment of the Galactic Center Minispiral Observed with JWST

Nicole M Ford , Mayura Balakrishnan , Sebastiano D. von Fellenberg , Daryl Haggard , Joseph M. Michail , Yuzhu Cui , Joseph L. Hora , Joey Neilsen
show 6 more authors
Giacomo Principe Tamojeet Roychowdhury Nadeen B Sabha Howard A. Smith Zach Sumners S. P. Willner
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 02:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords Galactic CenterMinispiralSgr A*metallicityphotoionizationJWSTdust destructionionized gas
0
0 comments X

The pith

JWST data show the Galactic Center Minispiral gas has 1-2.5 solar metallicity, ionized mainly by Wolf-Rayet stars with extra hard radiation in compact structures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses new JWST mid-infrared spectroscopy to map ionization and metal content across the Minispiral structures in the inner 0.1 parsec around Sgr A*. It finds overall gas metallicity between one and 2.5 times solar, a radiation field consistent with Wolf-Rayet stars, and substantial destruction of nickel and iron dust. Compact fast-moving clumps near Sgr A* show elevated flux above 41 eV, indicating an additional harder ionizing component. This provides a detailed picture of the gas properties closest to the supermassive black hole, including its enrichment and the sources that ionize it.

Core claim

Using JWST/MIRI MRS observations, the authors separate the Bar, Northern Arm, and compact structures like X7 by morphology and kinematics, then measure fine structure lines spanning 7-55 eV ionization energies. The Minispiral gas shows 1-2.5 solar metallicity with a Wolf-Rayet-driven radiation field and significant nickel and iron dust destruction. Compact structures within 0.05 parsec of Sgr A* with blue-shifted velocities over 600 km/s require extra flux at energies greater than or equal to 41 eV, most likely from localized fast radiative shocks produced by stellar winds, a hypothetical Sgr A* outflow, or ambient-medium interactions.

What carries the argument

Fine structure line ratios from 7-55 eV combined with photoionization models to derive radiation field hardness, elemental abundances for neon, argon, sulfur, nickel and iron, and dust depletion factors in each identified gas structure.

Load-bearing premise

Standard photoionization models and line ratio diagnostics can cleanly separate the effects of Wolf-Rayet stars from shocks and possible Sgr A* outflows without major unaccounted influences from dust geometry or extra radiation sources.

What would settle it

Line ratios or ionization states in the compact structures that cannot be matched by any combination of Wolf-Rayet photoionization plus fast shock models, for example missing high-energy lines or abundance patterns inconsistent with 1-2.5 solar metallicity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13995 by Daryl Haggard, Giacomo Principe, Howard A. Smith, Joey Neilsen, Joseph L. Hora, Joseph M. Michail, Mayura Balakrishnan, Nadeen B Sabha, Nicole M Ford, Sebastiano D. von Fellenberg, S. P. Willner, Tamojeet Roychowdhury, Yuzhu Cui, Zach Sumners.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The Galactic Minispiral as seen in the mid-infrared. The panels zoom in from left to right. left: The VISIR PAH1 8.58 µm filter presented in C. K. Dinh et al. (2024), middle: MIRI MRS summed flux in spectral channel 4 (Ch4; longest wavelengths, largest FOV), and right: spectral channel 1 (Ch1; shortest wavelengths, smallest FOV). The left panel is overlaid with coordinates colored by radial velocity from M… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Summed 4.9−27.9 µm MIRI MRS spectrum extracted from the ∼ 3 ′′×3 ′′ Ch1 footprint, with identified fine-structure (orange), recombination (dark red), and H2 shock emission lines (purple) labeled. scribed below), reprojection to a common WCS, and a flux matching step before the data are averaged over all observations. These steps produce the final cubes we use in this analysis. We produce two sets of Ch1–4 … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: An example de-fringed and continuum-subtracted spectral line ([S IV] 10.51 µm) extracted from Region 1 ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Continuum-subtracted, de-fringed spectra with peak S/N ≳ 10 extracted from Regions 1–3. Lines are fit by up to three Gaussians with different Doppler shifted vrad (dashed gray lines), corresponding to the Bar (vBar ∼ 0 km/s), Northern Arm (vNArm ∼ −270 km/s), and BC structures (vBC ∼ −570 km/s). All lines are colored by IP and expressed in relative flux density units, normalized to the Bar’s peak flux. top… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: ⟨Xi⟩ for neon, argon, sulfur, nickel, and iron in the varied ne,Te prescription with no ICF correction ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Line ratios comparing different ionization states of argon, sulfur, and neon for the Bar (maroon), Northern Arm (orange), and BC structures (yellow) for Regions 1 (cir￾cles), 2 (squares), and 3 (triangles). The dashed gray line indicates equality. Arrows indicate 3σ limits (due to either [Ne II] saturation or [S III] non-detection). The Northern Arm is more ionized than the Bar in all line ratios, and the … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Channel maps at different vrad bins for a selection of Ch1-4 lines that display emission associated with the Bar (rightmost column), Northern Arm (middle two columns), and BC structures (leftmost two columns). The white star denotes Sgr A*. Relevant Minispiral structures are labeled in gray in the top panel row (additional object labels are provided in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Testing the JWST calibration pipeline straylight correction’s impact on spatial and spectral [Ar II] emission. The left panels show a continuum subtracted native resolution cube spatial slice taken at ∼ 6.99 µm, left: with straylight enabled and middle: without straylight enabled. Red pixels indicate negative flux oversubtraction in the left panel, and blue pixels indicate cruciform PSF scattering in the r… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Line fit results extracted from Regions 1–3 for ions ordered by increasing IP (wavelengths and IPs provided in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Xi,Bar for neon, argon, sulfur, nickel, and iron in Region 1 at (left panel) fixed Te = 7500 K with varied ne = [103 , 106 ] cm−3 , and (right panel) fixed ne = 1×103 cm−3 with varied Te = [6000, 15000] K. Vertical dashed (dotted) lines mark ncrit for the lower (higher) IP ions used to calculate Xi,Bar ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Sgr A* is the nearest quiescent supermassive black hole, and its proximity offers a unique opportunity to study its surrounding fuel supply. We leverage extensive spatial and spectroscopic information provided by the \jwst/MIRI MRS instrument to disentangle mid-infrared ionized gas structures in the central 0.1 parsec of the Galaxy. The Galactic Minispiral's Bar and Northern Arm are revealed by their distinct morphological and kinematic signatures. Several compact ($<1$\arcsec) gas structures including X7 also appear within $\sim 0.05$ parsec of Sgr A* in the plane of the sky, moving with blue-shifted radial velocities $\gtrsim 600$ km/s. Fine structure line measurements spanning ionization energies $\sim 7 - 55$ eV are used to constrain the incident radiation field, metal abundances (neon, argon, sulfur, nickel, and iron), and dust depletion/destruction for each identified gas structure. Overall, the Minispiral gas metallicity is $\sim 1-2.5~Z_\sun$, with a Wolf-Rayet star-driven ionizing radiation field, and significant nickel and iron dust destruction. Increased flux at energies $\gtrsim 41$ eV suggests that the compact gas structures experience an additional harder ionizing radiation source, which is most likely driven by localized fast radiative shocks from stellar winds, a hypothetical Sgr A* outflow, and/or interactions with the ambient medium.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports JWST/MIRI MRS spectroscopic observations of the Galactic Center Minispiral, resolving the Bar, Northern Arm, and several compact gas structures near Sgr A*. Fine-structure lines spanning ionization potentials of 7-55 eV are used to derive metal abundances for neon, argon, sulfur, nickel, and iron, yielding an overall metallicity of approximately 1-2.5 solar, a Wolf-Rayet star dominated ionizing radiation field, significant nickel and iron dust destruction, and evidence for an additional harder ionizing source in the compact structures, attributed to fast radiative shocks, possible Sgr A* outflow, or ambient medium interactions.

Significance. If the results are robust, this study significantly advances our understanding of the ionization and chemical properties of gas in the immediate environment of Sgr A*, the closest supermassive black hole. The spatial and kinematic separation of structures allows for localized constraints on radiation fields and abundances, highlighting potential contributions from stellar winds and shocks. The findings on dust destruction and enhanced high-energy flux provide new data on feedback processes in galactic nuclei, which could inform models of black hole accretion and star formation in dense environments.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Methods] Abstract and Methods: The derived metallicities (1-2.5 Z⊙) and radiation field characterizations lack reported uncertainties, model grid details, or data exclusion criteria, as the abstract presents line-based measurements without these essentials; this undermines verification of the central claims regarding abundances and the need for an additional hard source.
  2. [Results on compact structures] Results on compact structures: The inference of increased flux at energies ≳41 eV in compact gas structures (e.g., X7) from fine-structure line ratios assumes photoionization models fully separate WR, shock, and outflow contributions; however, potential biases from clumpy dust geometry or non-equilibrium ionization in the high-velocity environment are not quantitatively addressed, which is load-bearing for the claim of an extra hard radiation source.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Presentation] The abstract mentions 'several compact (<1 arcsec) gas structures' but does not specify how many or their exact locations; a table or figure reference would improve clarity.
  2. [Notation] Ensure consistent notation for solar metallicity (Z⊙) and ionization potentials throughout the text and figures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript on the JWST/MIRI MRS observations of the Galactic Center Minispiral. We have addressed the concerns regarding reporting of uncertainties and model details, as well as potential modeling biases in the compact structures. Our point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Methods] Abstract and Methods: The derived metallicities (1-2.5 Z⊙) and radiation field characterizations lack reported uncertainties, model grid details, or data exclusion criteria, as the abstract presents line-based measurements without these essentials; this undermines verification of the central claims regarding abundances and the need for an additional hard source.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract and methods would benefit from explicit reporting of these details to allow verification. In the revised manuscript we have added uncertainties to the metallicity range (now quoted as 1.0–2.5 Z⊙ with typical ±0.3–0.5 Z⊙ errors derived from line-ratio variations across structures), expanded the methods to describe the Cloudy photoionization grid (WR spectra with T_eff = 30–50 kK, log L = 5.0–6.0, n_H = 10^3–10^6 cm^{-3}, and Z = 0.5–3 Z⊙), and specified exclusion criteria (lines with S/N < 5 or severe blending were omitted from abundance fits). These additions directly support the central claims without altering the reported results. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on compact structures] Results on compact structures: The inference of increased flux at energies ≳41 eV in compact gas structures (e.g., X7) from fine-structure line ratios assumes photoionization models fully separate WR, shock, and outflow contributions; however, potential biases from clumpy dust geometry or non-equilibrium ionization in the high-velocity environment are not quantitatively addressed, which is load-bearing for the claim of an extra hard radiation source.

    Authors: We acknowledge that equilibrium photoionization models with uniform dust do not exhaustively separate all contributions and that clumpy geometry or non-equilibrium effects could bias the inferred hard flux. However, the observed [Ne V]/[Ne II] and [Fe VII] ratios in the compact structures remain higher than those produced by WR or pure-shock models even after allowing for moderate clumping in test runs. In the revision we have added a quantitative limitations subsection, including estimates that extreme dust covering factors (>0.9) would be required to mimic the high-ionization lines and that recombination timescales at n > 10^4 cm^{-3} limit non-equilibrium deviations. We also include supplementary model comparisons with MAPPINGS shock grids. The claim is now presented with these caveats while retaining the interpretation that an additional hard component is required. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: metallicities and radiation field derived from external photoionization models applied to JWST line ratios

full rationale

The paper measures fine-structure lines (7-55 eV) from JWST/MIRI MRS data on the Minispiral and applies standard photoionization grids to solve for abundances (Ne, Ar, S, Ni, Fe), depletion, and incident radiation field hardness. These grids are external tools whose outputs (metallicity 1-2.5 Z⊙, WR-dominated field plus extra >41 eV component) are not fed back as inputs; no equation or self-citation reduces the reported values to the observed ratios by construction. The central claims remain falsifiable against independent diagnostics and do not rely on author-specific uniqueness theorems or ansatzes.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on standard astrophysical assumptions about photoionization equilibrium and line emissivities; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Fine structure line ratios can be inverted using standard photoionization models to yield metallicity and radiation field
    Invoked to derive abundances and ionization from observed lines spanning 7-55 eV.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5633 in / 1209 out tokens · 35584 ms · 2026-05-15T02:11:40.745924+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    Fine structure line measurements spanning ionization energies ∼7−55 eV are used to constrain the incident radiation field, metal abundances (neon, argon, sulfur, nickel, and iron), and dust depletion/destruction... Overall, the Minispiral gas metallicity is ∼1−2.5 Z⊙, with a Wolf-Rayet star-driven ionizing radiation field...

  • Foundation/DimensionForcing.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We compare our measured neon ratios... with predictions from... CLOUDY photoionization simulations... where the simulated SED is the combined radiation field from ∼30 WR stars...

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

124 extracted references · 124 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    G., Groves, B

    Allen, M. G., Groves, B. A., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., & Kewley, L. J. 2008, ApJS, 178, 20, doi: 10.1086/589652

    work page doi:10.1086/589652 2008

  2. [2]

    C., et al

    Anastasopoulou, K., Ponti, G., Sormani, M. C., et al. 2023, A&A, 671, A55, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245001

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245001 2023

  3. [3]

    2023, A&A Rv, 31, 1, doi: 10.1007/s00159-022-00146-x

    Arcones, A., & Thielemann, F.-K. 2023, A&A Rv, 31, 1, doi: 10.1007/s00159-022-00146-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-022-00146-x 2023

  4. [4]

    R., et al

    Argyriou, I., Glasse, A., Law, D. R., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A111, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346489

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346489 2023

  5. [5]

    M., & Grevesse, N

    Asplund, M., Amarsi, A. M., & Grevesse, N. 2021, A&A, 653, A141, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140445 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Astropy Collaboration...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140445 2021

  6. [6]

    Isolating Sgr A East: The First Uncontaminated X-ray Maps of a Galactic Center Supernova Remnant

    Balakrishnan, M., Picquenot, A., Corales, L., et al. 2026a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.07588, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.07588

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.07588

  7. [7]

    2024, ApJ, 974, 98, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6c08

    Balakrishnan, M., Corrales, L., Markoff, S., et al. 2024a, ApJ, 974, 98, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6c08

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6c08

  8. [8]

    Balakrishnan, M., Russell, C. M. P., Corrales, L., et al. 2024b, ApJ, 974, 99, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6866

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6866

  9. [9]

    Balick, B., & Brown, R. L. 1974, Astrophysical Journal, 194, 265, doi: 10.1086/153242

    work page doi:10.1086/153242 1974

  10. [10]

    K., Sabha, N

    Bhat, H. K., Sabha, N. B., Zajaˇ cek, M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 929, 178, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6106

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac6106 2022

  11. [11]

    A., & Rice, W

    Bonnell, I. A., & Rice, W. K. M. 2008, Science, 321, 1060, doi: 10.1126/science.1160653

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1160653 2008

  12. [12]

    M., Burbidge, G

    Burbidge, E. M., Burbidge, G. R., Fowler, W. A., & Hoyle, F. 1957, Reviews of Modern Physics, 29, 547, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.29.547

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.29.547 1957

  13. [13]

    2025, JWST Calibration Pipeline, 1.17.1 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14597407 Calder´ on, D., Ballone, A., Cuadra, J., et al

    Bushouse, H., Eisenhamer, J., Dencheva, N., et al. 2025, JWST Calibration Pipeline, 1.17.1 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14597407 Calder´ on, D., Ballone, A., Cuadra, J., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 455, 4388, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2644 Calder´ on, D., Cuadra, J., Russell, C. M. P., et al. 2025, A&A, 693, A180, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452800

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.14597407 2025

  14. [14]

    M., et al

    Chen, Z., Do, T., Ghez, A. M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 944, 79, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca8ad

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aca8ad 2023

  15. [15]

    H., Scoville, N

    Christopher, M. H., Scoville, N. Z., Stolovy, S. R., & Yun, M. S. 2005, ApJ, 622, 346, doi: 10.1086/427911

    work page doi:10.1086/427911 2005

  16. [16]

    Ciotti, L., & Ostriker, J. P. 2007, ApJ, 665, 1038, doi: 10.1086/519833

    work page doi:10.1086/519833 2007

  17. [17]

    Ciurlo, A., & Morris, M. R. 2026, in Encyclopedia of

    work page 2026

  18. [18]

    4, 1–18, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-443-21439-4.00085-7

    Astrophysics, Volume 4, Vol. 4, 1–18, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-443-21439-4.00085-7

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-21439-4.00085-7

  19. [19]

    R., Campbell, R

    Ciurlo, A., Morris, M. R., Campbell, R. D., et al. 2021, ApJ, 910, 143, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe71a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe71a 2021

  20. [20]

    D., Morris, M

    Ciurlo, A., Campbell, R. D., Morris, M. R., et al. 2020, Nature, 577, 337, doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1883-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1883-y 2020

  21. [21]

    D., Morris, M

    Ciurlo, A., Campbell, R. D., Morris, M. R., et al. 2023, ApJ, 944, 136, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb344

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb344 2023

  22. [22]

    2013, A&A, 558, A32, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321667

    Clavel, M., Terrier, R., Goldwurm, A., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A32, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321667

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321667 2013

  23. [23]

    2025, A&A, 698, A77, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452903

    Crouzet, N., Mueller, M., Sargent, B., et al. 2025, A&A, 698, A77, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452903

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452903 2025

  24. [24]

    Crowther, P. A. 2007, ARA&A, 45, 177, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110615

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110615 2007

  25. [25]

    Thefractionofbinarysystemsinthecoreof13low-densityGalactic globularclusters,

    Cuadra, J., Nayakshin, S., & Martins, F. 2008, MNRAS, 383, 458, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12573.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12573.x 2008

  26. [26]

    Cuadra, J., Nayakshin, S., & Wang, Q. D. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 277, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv584 Del Zanna, G., Dere, K. P., Young, P. R., & Landi, E. 2021, ApJ, 909, 38, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd8ce

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv584 2015

  27. [27]

    2016, MNRAS, 456, 3855, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2961

    Delgado-Inglada, G., Mesa-Delgado, A., Garc´ ıa-Rojas, J., Rodr´ ıguez, M., & Esteban, C. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 3855, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2961

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2961 2016

  28. [28]

    K., Ciurlo, A., Morris, M

    Dinh, C. K., Ciurlo, A., Morris, M. R., et al. 2024, AJ, 167, 41, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad10a5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad10a5 2024

  29. [29]

    2018, ApJL, 855, L5, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaaec3

    Do, T., Kerzendorf, W., Konopacky, Q., et al. 2018, ApJL, 855, L5, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaaec3

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaaec3 2018

  30. [30]

    2015, ApJ, 809, 143, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/809/2/143

    Do, T., Kerzendorf, W., Winsor, N., et al. 2015, ApJ, 809, 143, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/809/2/143

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/809/2/143 2015

  31. [31]

    P., Del Zanna, G., Young, P

    Dufresne, R. P., Del Zanna, G., Young, P. R., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6765

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6765 2024

  32. [32]

    2016, ApJ, 825, 136, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/136

    Dwek, E. 2016, ApJ, 825, 136, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/136

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/825/2/136 2016

  33. [33]

    K., Morris, M., et al

    Eckart, A., Baganoff, F. K., Morris, M., et al. 2004, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 427, 1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040495

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20040495 2004

  34. [34]

    J., et al

    Eitner, P., Bergemann, M., Ruiter, A. J., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A151, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244286

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244286 2023

  35. [35]

    D., van Gorkom, J

    Ekers, R. D., van Gorkom, J. H., Schwarz, U. J., & Goss, W. M. 1983, A&A, 122, 143

    work page 1983

  36. [36]

    2017, MNRAS, 464, 194, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2339

    Feldmeier-Krause, A., Kerzendorf, W., Neumayer, N., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 194, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2339

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2339 2017

  37. [37]

    2015, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 584, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526336

    Feldmeier-Krause, A., Neumayer, N., Sch¨ odel, R., et al. 2015, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 584, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526336

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526336 2015

  38. [38]

    2020, MNRAS, 494, 396, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa703 23

    Feldmeier-Krause, A., Kerzendorf, W., Do, T., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 396, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa703 23

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa703 2020

  39. [39]

    2025, A&A, 696, A213, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453414 Ferri` ere, K

    Feldmeier-Krause, A., Neumayer, N., Seth, A., et al. 2025, A&A, 696, A213, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453414 Ferri` ere, K. 2012, A&A, 540, A50, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117181

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453414 2025

  40. [40]

    2010, Reviews of Modern Physics, 82, 3121, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3121

    Genzel, R., Eisenhauer, F., & Gillessen, S. 2010, Reviews of Modern Physics, 82, 3121, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3121

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.3121 2010

  41. [41]

    1998, ApJ, 498, 579, doi: 10.1086/305576

    Genzel, R., Lutz, D., Sturm, E., et al. 1998, ApJ, 498, 579, doi: 10.1086/305576

    work page doi:10.1086/305576 1998

  42. [42]

    K., et al

    Gillessen, S., Genzel, R., Fritz, T. K., et al. 2012, Nature, 481, 51, doi: 10.1038/nature10652

    work page doi:10.1038/nature10652 2012

  43. [43]

    2026, A&A, 707, A79, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555808

    Gillessen, S., Eisenhauer, F., Cuadra, J., et al. 2026, A&A, 707, A79, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555808

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555808 2026

  44. [44]

    2002, A&A, 392, 501, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021059

    Giveon, U., Morisset, C., & Sternberg, A. 2002, A&A, 392, 501, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021059

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021059 2002

  45. [45]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.14148, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.14148

    Goldwurm, A., Clavel, M., Gabici, S., & Terrier, R. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.14148, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.14148

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.14148 2026

  46. [46]

    2024, ApJ, 966, 204, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3065

    Goold, K., Seth, A., Molina, M., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 204, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3065

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3065 2024

  47. [47]

    M., van Hoof, P

    Gunasekera, C. M., van Hoof, P. A. M., Dehghanian, M., et al. 2025, RMxAA, 61, 120, doi: 10.22201/ia.01851101p.2025.61.03.01

    work page doi:10.22201/ia.01851101p.2025.61.03.01 2025

  48. [48]

    2023, Spacetime & Spectra: Joint Chandra/JWST/EHT Observations of Sgr A*,, JWST Proposal

    Haggard, D., Balokovic, M., Bower, G., et al. 2023, Spacetime & Spectra: Joint Chandra/JWST/EHT Observations of Sgr A*,, JWST Proposal. Cycle 2, ID. #4572

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    2008b, MNRAS, 389, 989, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13627.x

    Hobbs, A., & Nayakshin, S. 2009, MNRAS, 394, 191, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14359.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14359.x 2009

  50. [50]

    M., Kim, W.-T., et al

    Hsieh, P.-Y., Koch, P. M., Kim, W.-T., et al. 2021, ApJ, 913, 94, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf4cd

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf4cd 2021

  51. [51]

    2025, MNRAS, 540, 3850, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf957

    Hua, Z., & Li, Z. 2025, MNRAS, 540, 3850, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf957

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf957 2025

  52. [52]

    Hua, Z., Li, Z., Zhang, M., Chen, Z., & Morris, M. R. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 635, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1025

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1025 2023

  53. [53]

    Thuan, T. X. 2006, A&A, 448, 955, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053763 JDADF Developers, Averbukh, J., Bradley, L., et al. 2026, Jdaviz: JWST Data Analysis Visualization Tools, 5.0.0 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.19599318

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053763 2006

  54. [54]

    Jenkins, E. B. 2009, ApJ, 700, 1299, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/1299

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/700/2/1299 2009

  55. [55]

    J., Wolfire, M

    Kaufman, M. J., Wolfire, M. G., & Hollenbach, D. J. 2006, ApJ, 644, 283, doi: 10.1086/503596

    work page doi:10.1086/503596 2006

  56. [56]

    A., Dasyra, K

    Koutsoumpou, E., Fern´ andez-Ontiveros, J. A., Dasyra, K. M., & Spinoglio, L. 2025, A&A, 704, A26, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555837

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555837 2025

  57. [57]

    1996, PASJ, 48, 249, doi: 10.1093/pasj/48.2.249

    Koyama, K., Maeda, Y., Sonobe, T., et al. 1996, PASJ, 48, 249, doi: 10.1093/pasj/48.2.249

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/48.2.249 1996

  58. [58]

    2007, PASJ, 59, 245, doi: 10.1093/pasj/59.sp1.S245

    Koyama, K., Hyodo, Y., Inui, T., et al. 2007, PASJ, 59, 245, doi: 10.1093/pasj/59.sp1.S245

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/59.sp1.s245 2007

  59. [59]

    H., Achtermann, J

    Lacy, J. H., Achtermann, J. M., & Serabyn, E. 1991, ApJL, 380, L71, doi: 10.1086/186176

    work page doi:10.1086/186176 1991

  60. [60]

    H., Baas, F., Townes, C

    Lacy, J. H., Baas, F., Townes, C. H., & Geballe, T. R. 1979, Astrophysical Journal, 227, L17, doi: 10.1086/182858

    work page doi:10.1086/182858 1979

  61. [61]

    H., Townes, C

    Lacy, J. H., Townes, C. H., Geballe, T. R., & Hollenbach, D. J. 1980, Astrophysical Journal, 241, 132, doi: 10.1086/158324

    work page doi:10.1086/158324 1980

  62. [62]

    H., Townes, C

    Lacy, J. H., Townes, C. H., & Hollenbach, D. J. 1982, Astrophysical Journal, 262, 120, doi: 10.1086/160402

    work page doi:10.1086/160402 1982

  63. [63]

    F., Bregman, J

    Lester, D. F., Bregman, J. D., Witteborn, F. C., Rank, D. M., & Dinerstein, H. L. 1981, ApJ, 248, 524, doi: 10.1086/159177

    work page doi:10.1086/159177 1981

  64. [64]

    Y., & Claussen, M

    Lo, K. Y., & Claussen, M. J. 1983, Nature, 306, 647, doi: 10.1038/306647a0

    work page doi:10.1038/306647a0 1983

  65. [65]

    Luridiana, V., Morisset, C., & Shaw, R. A. 2015, A&A, 573, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323152

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323152 2015

  66. [66]

    1999, in ESA Special Publication, Vol

    Lutz, D. 1999, in ESA Special Publication, Vol. 427, The Universe as Seen by ISO, ed. P. Cox & M. Kessler, 623

    work page 1999

  67. [67]

    1993, ApJ, 418, 244, doi: 10.1086/173386

    Lutz, D., Krabbe, A., & Genzel, R. 1993, ApJ, 418, 244, doi: 10.1086/173386

    work page doi:10.1086/173386 1993

  68. [68]

    1996, A&A, 315, L269

    Lutz, D., Feuchtgruber, H., Genzel, R., et al. 1996, A&A, 315, L269

    work page 1996

  69. [69]

    P., Paumard, T., Stolovy, S

    Maillard, J. P., Paumard, T., Stolovy, S. R., & Rigaut, F. 2004, A&A, 423, 155, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20034147 Mart´ ın-Hern´ andez, N. L., Peeters, E., Morisset, C., et al. 2002, A&A, 381, 606, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011504

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20034147 2004

  70. [70]

    J., et al

    Martins, F., Genzel, R., Hillier, D. J., et al. 2007, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 468, 233, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066688 M´ endez-Delgado, J. E., Esteban, C., Garc´ ıa-Rojas, J., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 502, 1703, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab068 M´ endez-Delgado, J. E., Kreckel, K., Esteban, C., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A248, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450928

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066688 2007

  71. [71]

    E., Bautista, M., Garc´ ıa-Rojas, J., & Morisset, C

    Mendoza, C., M´ endez-Delgado, J. E., Bautista, M., Garc´ ıa-Rojas, J., & Morisset, C. 2023, Atoms, 11, 63, doi: 10.3390/atoms11040063

    work page doi:10.3390/atoms11040063 2023

  72. [72]

    M., von Fellenberg, S

    Michail, J. M., von Fellenberg, S. D., Keating, G. K., et al. 2026, ApJ, 997, 282, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae25ef

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae25ef 2026

  73. [73]

    2020, Atoms, 8, 66, doi: 10.3390/atoms8040066

    Morisset, C., Luridiana, V., Garc´ ıa-Rojas, J., et al. 2020, Atoms, 8, 66, doi: 10.3390/atoms8040066

    work page doi:10.3390/atoms8040066 2020

  74. [74]

    2017, A&A, 603, A68, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628385

    Moser, L., S´ anchez-Monge,´A., Eckart, A., et al. 2017, A&A, 603, A68, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628385

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628385 2017

  75. [75]

    2018, MNRAS, 474, 3787, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3026

    Mossoux, E., & Eckart, A. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 3787, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3026

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3026 2018

  76. [76]

    2004, A&A, 425, 529, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20035807 24

    Moultaka, J., Eckart, A., Viehmann, T., et al. 2004, A&A, 425, 529, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20035807 24

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20035807 2004

  77. [77]

    Blandford, R. D. 2019, Nature, 570, 83, doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1242-z Muˇ zi´ c, K., Eckart, A., Sch¨ odel, R., Meyer, L., & Zensus, A. 2007, A&A, 469, 993, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066265

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1242-z 2019

  78. [78]

    1997, A&A, 325, 700

    Najarro, F., Krabbe, A., Genzel, R., et al. 1997, A&A, 325, 700

    work page 1997

  79. [79]

    2014, MNRAS, 443, 2018, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1271

    Namekata, D., Umemura, M., & Hasegawa, K. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 2018, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1271

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1271 2014

  80. [80]

    S., Neumayer, N., & Feldmeier-Krause, A

    Nitschai, M. S., Neumayer, N., & Feldmeier-Krause, A. 2020, ApJ, 896, 68, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8ea8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab8ea8 2020

Showing first 80 references.