arxiv: 2605.14139 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · ⚛️ physics.soc-ph · math-ph· math.MP

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

How opinions shape epidemics: a graphon-based kinetic approach

Abu Safyan Ali , Elisa Calzola , Giacomo Dimarco , Lorenzo Pareschi , Thomas Rey

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 02:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.soc-ph math-phmath.MP

keywords opinion dynamicsepidemic modelinggraphonskinetic theorymean-field limitsocial networkscompartmental modelsdisease transmission

0 comments

The pith

A mean-field limit from microscopic compromise rules yields a graphon kinetic model coupling opinions to epidemic spread.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a multiscale framework that links individual opinion formation to population-level epidemic dynamics. It begins with microscopic rules for interpersonal compromise and self-thinking, then applies a mean-field limit to obtain a kinetic compartmental model defined on graphons. Graphons encode the heterogeneous large-scale contact patterns that govern transmission while opinions modulate preventive behaviors. The resulting equations track the joint evolution of disease compartments and opinion distributions. Numerical experiments confirm that this approach captures how targeted shifts in opinions can alter overall spread.

Core claim

Starting from a microscopic description governed by interpersonal compromise and intrinsic self-thinking processes, we derive a kinetic compartmental epidemic model on graphons via a mean-field limit. This formulation allows us to investigate the joint evolution of the disease state and the opinion distribution, with a particular focus on the role of social networks and physical contacts.

What carries the argument

Graphon representation of heterogeneous networks combined with a kinetic description of microscopic physical contacts, which carries the mean-field limit from individual opinion and contact processes to population-scale compartmental dynamics.

If this is right

Controlling opinion distributions offers a concrete lever for reducing effective transmission rates.
Heterogeneous contact patterns encoded by graphons produce non-uniform epidemic thresholds across the population.
The joint evolution equations permit simulation of how opinion changes propagate into altered disease compartments.
Numerical results indicate that shaping population opinions can serve as a mitigation strategy alongside traditional interventions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same mean-field graphon construction could be reused for other coupled social-physical processes such as traffic flow or collective decision-making.
Calibrating the compromise and self-thinking parameters with social-media or survey data would allow quantitative forecasts for specific communities.
Time-dependent graphons could be introduced to model networks that rewire during the course of an epidemic.

Load-bearing premise

The mean-field limit and graphon representation accurately preserve the essential heterogeneous contact and opinion dynamics without introducing uncontrolled errors at the population scale.

What would settle it

Direct comparison of the model's predicted epidemic trajectories and opinion distributions against measured data from a real population whose contact network and opinion shifts are independently recorded; large systematic deviations would falsify the derivation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.14139 by Abu Safyan Ali, Elisa Calzola, Giacomo Dimarco, Lorenzo Pareschi, Thomas Rey.

**Figure 2.1.** Figure 2.1: Schematic representation of the proposed multiscale opinion–epidemic model. Opinion interactions are described at the microscopic level and, in the continuum limit, through a graphon-based kinetic/Fokker–Planck framework. Physical contacts are also modeled microscopically and then represented macroscopically through a probability distribution of the number of contacts. Both ingredients are coupled in th… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.2.** Figure 2.2: 6 × 6 adjacency matrix and corresponding pixel visualization. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.3.** Figure 2.3: Pixel representations of graphs with n = 10, 100, 1000. graphs and to make convergence precise, one introduces a distance D(B, C) between two graphons B and C (see [37]) given by D(B, C) = inf φ,ψ sup S,T [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.4.** Figure 2.4: Function κ(w, w∗) in (2.11) for η = 0.1 (left), η = 0.5 (middle) and η = 1 (right). For all cases, β = 0.5. post-interaction opinions according to w ′ = w + αJ H P(w, w∗, x, y) (w∗ − w) + ζHJ D(x, w), w ′ ∗ = w∗ + αJ H P(w∗, w, y, x) (w − w∗) + ζJ H D(y, w∗), (2.12) where αJ H ∈ [0, 1 2 ] is the compromise parameter and P ∈ [0, 1] modulates the interaction strength based on the agents’ positions on the g… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.5.** Figure 3.5: Illustration of the SAS algorithm for two different scenarios. mathematical formulation of the Sorting-And-Smoothing (SAS) algorithm, following the schematic illustration in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.6.** Figure 3.6: Estimated graphons for real networks. First row: Collaboration network of arXiv astro physics (ca-AstroPh) n = 1.8 × 104 . Second row: who-trusts-whom network of Epinions.com (soc- Epinions1) n = 7.5 × 104 . followed by the epidemiological step f ∗∗ J = E∆t(f ∗ J ), which reads    ∂tf ∗∗ S = K(f ∗∗ S , f ∗∗ I )(x, w, t), ∂tf ∗∗ E = K(f ∗∗ S , f ∗∗ I )(x, w, t) − σEf ∗∗ E , ∂tf ∗∗ I… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.7.** Figure 4.7: Left: plot of the separable graphon in (4.30). Center: plot of the real collaboration network of arXiv astro physics (BA(x, y)), reconstructed using 50 bins. Right: plot of the real who-trusts-whom network (BE(x, y)), reconstructed using 50 bins. A comparison of Figures 4.8–4.10 reveals that the qualitative behavior of the opinion dynamics is remarkably consistent across the different graphon structures… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.8.** Figure 4.8: Separable graphon (4.30). Surface plot (top), different time frames (bottom) for the evolution of the opinions in time. First column: P1(w, w∗, x, y) in (4.31). Second column: P2(w, w∗, x, y) in (4.31). Third column: P3(w, w∗, x, y) in (4.31) the interaction rules, while the network structure acts as a modulating factor provided it exhibits sufficient heterogeneity. In particular, these results highlight… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.9.** Figure 4.9: Real graphon from the arXiv astroPh collaboration network (BA(x, y)). Surface plot (top), different time frames (bottom) for the evolution of the opinions in time. First column: P1(w, w∗, x, y) in (4.31). Second column: P2(w, w∗, x, y) in (4.31). Third column: P3(w, w∗, x, y) in (4.31) with parameters ν = 1.65, δ = 1, and z = 10.25, in agreement with the empirical data reported in [18]. For the epidemic… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.10.** Figure 4.10: Real graphon from the who-trusts-whom network (BE(x, y)). Surface plot (top), different time frames (bottom) for the evolution of the opinions in time. First column: P1(w, w∗, x, y) in (4.31). Second column: P2(w, w∗, x, y) in (4.31). Third column: P3(w, w∗, x, y) in (4.31) Setting 1a. As introduced above, we split the population into two groups: individuals with a high number of physical contacts, char… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.11.** Figure 4.11: Distribution of physical contacts (left) and of β(1 − w)(1 − w∗)/4 in the case z = z∗ = 1, η = 1, β = 0.4 (right). Using these definitions, the initial condition is given by fS(z, x, w, 0) = ρS(0) fz(z) ¯g1,S(w, x) di(x), fE(z, x, w, 0) = ρE(0) fz(z) ¯g1,E(w, x) di(x), fI (z, x, w, 0) = ρI (0) fz(z) ¯g1,I (w, x) di(x), fR(z, x, w, 0) = ρR(0) fz(z) ¯g1,R(w, x) di(x). (4.33) The threshold parameter is set… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.12.** Figure 4.12: Setting 1a (top row): evolution of the compartment masses (left) and the marginal of opinions (right). Setting 2a (bottom row): evolution of the compartment masses (left) and the marginal of opinions (right). 4.3 On the joint influence of graphon connectivity and physical contacts on the epidemic spread This section is devoted to the study of the epidemic spread in the presence of both heterogeneous ph… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.13.** Figure 4.13: Setting 1b (top row): evolution of the compartment masses (left) and the marginal of opinions (right). Setting 2b (bottom row): evolution of the compartment masses (left) and the marginal of opinions (right) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_4_13.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.14.** Figure 4.14: Comparison between the evolution of the mass of infected over time for Setting 1b and Setting 2b. Within this setting, the classical susceptible-exposed-infected-recovered (SEIR) model is extended by incorporating a kinetic description of opinion dynamics on protective measures, evolving over the same underlying network. This results in a unified framework in 31 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Understanding the mutual influence between social behavior and physical health is crucial for designing effective epidemic mitigation strategies. Individual interactions drive the evolution of opinions, which in turn shape how infectious diseases are perceived and consequently how they spread within a population, for instance through the adoption or rejection of preventive measures. At the same time, the distribution and dynamics of physical contacts play a fundamental role in determining transmission patterns. To this end, we develop a mathematical framework to analyze the coupled dynamics of opinion formation, disease transmission, and physical contacts by employing graphon-based networks, which capture heterogeneous and large-scale connectivity patterns typical of realistic social structures. The epidemic compartmental model further incorporates a kinetic description of microscopic level physical contacts, allowing for a consistent multiscale representation of interaction patterns. Starting from a microscopic description governed by interpersonal compromise and intrinsic self-thinking processes, we derive a kinetic compartmental epidemic model on graphons via a mean-field limit. This formulation allows us to investigate the joint evolution of the disease state and the opinion distribution, with a particular focus on the role of social networks and physical contacts. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the graphon-kinetic approach provides a comprehensive representation of the coupled opinion-epidemic dynamics, revealing new possibilities for controlling disease spread by shaping population opinion patterns.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper derives a graphon-kinetic epidemic model from microscopic opinion rules via mean-field limit, but the convergence step lacks explicit error bounds.

read the letter

The core contribution is a derivation that starts from simple microscopic rules for opinion compromise and self-thinking, then passes to a kinetic compartmental system on graphons that tracks both infection states and opinion distributions. This coupling is new in the specific way it lets opinion shifts modulate contact intensities and transmission probabilities on heterogeneous large-scale networks. The numerics then illustrate how different opinion patterns can steer epidemic outcomes, which gives a concrete handle on behavioral feedback that standard models often miss. The construction avoids obvious circularity by building from stated microscopic rules rather than fitting inside the equations themselves. The main soft spot is the mean-field limit. When opinions evolve and change who contacts whom, the interaction kernels depend on the current distribution, so standard propagation-of-chaos arguments need uniform Lipschitz control or remainder estimates that stay valid over time. If the full text only performs formal averaging without those controls, the kinetic equations can drift from finite-population behavior. The numerics are presented as supportive but would need independent checks on parameter robustness and grid resolution. This is for people already working on multiscale network models in epidemiology or opinion dynamics. A reader who wants a framework that links social behavior to transmission on realistic connectivity would get usable ideas from the setup and the experiments. It deserves peer review so referees can examine the limit derivation and the numerical validation in detail.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to start from a microscopic model of opinion formation driven by interpersonal compromise and intrinsic self-thinking, then derive via mean-field limit a closed kinetic compartmental epidemic model on graphons that couples disease states with opinion distributions, where opinions modulate contact intensities and transmission. Numerical experiments are presented to illustrate how opinion patterns influence epidemic spread on heterogeneous networks.

Significance. If the mean-field limit can be justified rigorously, the framework supplies a multiscale description linking individual social rules to macroscopic epidemic dynamics on graphons, which could inform strategies for shaping opinions to control disease. The approach integrates kinetic contact modeling with graphon heterogeneity in a way that preserves some structural features of realistic social networks.

major comments (1)

[Mean-field limit derivation] The derivation of the kinetic equations (likely in the section following the microscopic rules) invokes a mean-field limit on graphons without supplying uniform Lipschitz bounds on the interaction kernels, remainder estimates, or propagation-of-chaos controls that account for the joint evolution of the opinion variable and infection compartments. Because opinion directly modulates contact intensities and transmission probabilities, standard graphon arguments may fail to guarantee convergence at finite but large population sizes; explicit error bounds or a counter-example check would be required to support the central claim.

minor comments (2)

[Numerical experiments] The abstract states that numerical experiments demonstrate the approach, but the main text should specify the exact graphon kernels, discretization parameters, and quantitative metrics (e.g., L1 or Wasserstein distances to microscopic simulations) used for validation.
[Model formulation] Notation for the opinion variable and its coupling to the transmission rate should be introduced with a clear table or diagram early in the model section to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comment regarding the mean-field limit derivation below and will revise the paper to strengthen the rigor of this aspect.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The derivation of the kinetic equations (likely in the section following the microscopic rules) invokes a mean-field limit on graphons without supplying uniform Lipschitz bounds on the interaction kernels, remainder estimates, or propagation-of-chaos controls that account for the joint evolution of the opinion variable and infection compartments. Because opinion directly modulates contact intensities and transmission probabilities, standard graphon arguments may fail to guarantee convergence at finite but large population sizes; explicit error bounds or a counter-example check would be required to support the central claim.

Authors: We agree that the current derivation is formal and would benefit from explicit justification of the mean-field limit under the coupled dynamics. In the revised manuscript, we will add a dedicated subsection that states the required assumptions on the interaction kernels (uniform Lipschitz continuity in both the opinion variable and the infection compartments, together with boundedness of the opinion-modulated contact intensities). We will also include a sketch of the propagation-of-chaos argument adapted to the joint evolution, following the standard graphon mean-field techniques while accounting for the additional dependence on infection states. This will comprise remainder estimates showing convergence in the appropriate Wasserstein-type distance as the number of agents tends to infinity. These additions will support the central claim without changing the overall modeling framework or numerical results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Mean-field derivation from microscopic rules to graphon-kinetic model is self-contained

full rationale

The paper explicitly starts from a microscopic description of interpersonal compromise and intrinsic self-thinking processes, then applies a mean-field limit to obtain the kinetic compartmental epidemic model on graphons. No core equation or prediction reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or ansatz smuggled from prior work by the same authors. The graphon representation is introduced as a modeling device for heterogeneous contacts rather than derived circularly from the target equations. Standard mean-field techniques are invoked without the derivation itself depending on quantities fitted inside the same paper. This is the most common honest non-finding for derivation papers.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard kinetic-theory and graphon-limit assumptions with no new free parameters or invented entities introduced at the abstract level.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Mean-field limit applies to the graphon-based network interactions.
Invoked when passing from microscopic interpersonal rules to the kinetic compartmental equations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5533 in / 1118 out tokens · 60828 ms · 2026-05-15T02:03:00.086653+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Starting from a microscopic description governed by interpersonal compromise and intrinsic self-thinking processes, we derive a kinetic compartmental epidemic model on graphons via a mean-field limit.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic.lean embed_injective unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The resulting Fokker–Planck model associated with (2.18) reads ∂tfJ(x,w,t)=1/τ ∑ QJ(fJ,fH)(x,w,t)

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

[1]

E. M. Airoldi, D. Blei, S. Fienberg, and E. Xing. Mixed membership stochastic blockmodels. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 21, 2008

work page 2008
[2]

G. Albi, E. Calzola, and G. Dimarco. A data-driven kinetic model for opinion dy- namics with social network contacts. European Journal of Applied Mathematics , 36:264–290, 2024

work page 2024
[3]

G. Albi, E. Calzola, G. Dimarco, and M. Zanella. Impact of opinion formation phe- nomena in epidemic dynamics: kinetic modeling on networks. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 85(2):779–805, 2025

work page 2025
[4]

G. Albi, L. Pareschi, and M. Zanella. Boltzmann-type control of opinion consensus through leaders. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society a Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences , 372:20140138, 2014

work page 2014
[5]

G. Albi, L. Pareschi, and M. Zanella. On the optimal control of opinion dynamics on evolving networks. In L. Bociu, J.-A. Désidéri, and A. Habbal, editors, System Mod- eling and Optimization , pages 58–67, Cham, 2016. Springer International Publishing

work page 2016
[6]

G. Albi, L. Pareschi, and M. Zanella. Opinion dynamics over complex networks: kinetic modelling and numerical methods. Kinetic and Related Models, 10:1–32, 2017

work page 2017
[7]

Amelkin, F

V. Amelkin, F. Bullo, and A. K. Singh. Polar opinion dynamics in social networks. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control , 62(11):5650–5665, 2017

work page 2017
[8]

Barré, P

J. Barré, P. Degond, and E. Zatorska. Kinetic theory of particle interactions mediated by dynamical networks. Multiscale Modeling and Simulation , 15:1294–1323, 2017

work page 2017
[9]

Bartel, J

H. Bartel, J. Lampert, and H. Ranocha. Structure-preserving numerical methods for Fokker–Planck equations. PAMM, 24(4):e202400007, 2024

work page 2024
[10]

Bayraktar, S

E. Bayraktar, S. Chakraborty, and R. Wu. Graphon mean field systems. The Annals of Applied Probability , 33(5):3587–3619, 2023

work page 2023
[11]

Beckley, C

R. Beckley, C. Weatherspoon, M. Alexander, M. Chandler, A. Johnson, and G. S. Bhatt. Modeling epidemics with differential equations. Tennessee State University Internal Report, 32:33–34, 2013

work page 2013
[12]

Bellomo and M

N. Bellomo and M. A. Chaplain. Predicting pandemics in a globally connected world, Volume 1: Toward a Multiscale, Multidisciplinary Framework Through Modeling and Simulation. Springer Nature, 2022. 38

work page 2022
[13]

Bertaglia, W

G. Bertaglia, W. Boscheri, G. Dimarco, and L. Pareschi. Spatial spread of COVID- 19 outbreak in Italy using multiscale kinetic transport equations with uncertainty. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering , 18(5):7028–7059, 2021

work page 2021
[14]

Bicego, D

S. Bicego, D. Kalise, and G. A. Pavliotis. Computation and control of unstable steady states for mean field multiagent systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , 481(2311):20240476, 04 2025

work page 2025
[15]

Bonandin and M

S. Bonandin and M. Zanella. Effects of heterogeneous opinion interactions in many- agent systems for epidemic dynamics. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 19(1):235– 261, 2024

work page 2024
[16]

Bondesan, J

A. Bondesan, J. Borsotti, and M. Fontana. Kinetic models of opinion-driven epidemic dynamics modulated by graphons, 2026

work page 2026
[17]

Bondesan, G

A. Bondesan, G. Toscani, and M. Zanella. Kinetic compartmental models driven by opinion dynamics: Vaccine hesitancy and social influence. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences , 34:1043–1076, 2024

work page 2024
[18]

Béraud, S

G. Béraud, S. Kazmercziak, P. Beutels, D. Levy-Bruhl, X. Lenne, N. Mielcarek, Y. Yazdanpanah, P.-Y. Boëlle, N. Hens, and B. Dervaux. The French Connection: The First Large Population-Based Contact Survey in France Relevant for the Spread of Infectious Diseases. Plos one , 10(7):e0133203, 2015

work page 2015
[19]

Caron, F

F. Caron, F. Panero, and J. Rousseau. On sparsity, power-law, and clustering prop- erties of graphex processes. Advances in Applied Probability , 55:1211–1253, 2023

work page 2023
[20]

Chan and E

S. Chan and E. Airoldi. A consistent histogram estimator for exchangeable graph models. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 208–216. PMLR, 2014

work page 2014
[21]

Ciallella, M

A. Ciallella, M. Pulvirenti, and S. Simonella. Kinetic SIR equations and particle limits. Proceedings of the Lincei National Academy of Sciences, Physics, Mat. Natur. , 32(2):295–315, 2021

work page 2021
[22]

F. Coppini. A note on Fokker–Planck equations and graphons. Journal of Statistical Physics, 187(2):15, 2022

work page 2022
[23]

Danon, A

L. Danon, A. Ford, T. House, C. Jewell, M. Keeling, G. Roberts, J. Ross, and M. Ver- non. Networks and the epidemiology of infectious disease. Interdisciplinary Perspec- tives on Infectious Diseases , 2011:1–28, 2011

work page 2011
[24]

A. Das, S. Gollapudi, and K. Munagala. Modeling opinion dynamics in social net- works. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining , pages 403–412, 2014. 39

work page 2014
[25]

M. H. DeGroot. Reaching a consensus. Journal of the American Statistical Associa- tion, 69(345):118–121, 1974

work page 1974
[26]

Della Marca, N

R. Della Marca, N. Loy, and A. Tosin. An SIR–like kinetic model tracking individuals’ viral load. Networks & Heterogeneous Media , 17(3), 2022

work page 2022
[27]

Dezecache, C

G. Dezecache, C. Frith, and O. Deroy. Pandemics and the great evolutionary mis- match. Current Biology, 30:R417–R419, 2020

work page 2020
[28]

Dimarco, B

G. Dimarco, B. Perthame, G. Toscani, and M. Zanella. Kinetic models for epidemic dynamics with social heterogeneity. J. Math. Biol. , 83(1):Paper No. 4, 32, 2021

work page 2021
[29]

Dimarco, G

G. Dimarco, G. Toscani, and M. Zanella. Optimal control of epidemic spreading in the presence of social heterogeneity. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society A, 380(2224):20210160, 2022

work page 2022
[30]

Dolbeault and G

J. Dolbeault and G. Turinici. Heterogeneous social interactions and the COVID- 19 lockdown outcome in a multi-group SEIR model. Math. Model. Nat. Phenom. , 15:Paper No. 36, 18, 2020

work page 2020
[31]

D. P. Durham and E. A. Casman. Incorporating individual health-protective decisions into disease transmission models: a mathematical framework. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 9:562–570, 2011

work page 2011
[32]

Düring, J

B. Düring, J. Franceschi, M.-T. Wolfram, and M. Zanella. Breaking consensus in kinetic opinion formation models on graphons. Journal of Nonlinear Science, 34(4):79, 2024

work page 2024
[33]

Düring and M

B. Düring and M. Wolfram. Opinion dynamics: inhomogeneous Boltzmann-type equations modelling opinion leadership and political segregation. Proceedings of the Royal Society a Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences , 471:20150345, 2015

work page 2015
[34]

Fagioli and G

S. Fagioli and G. Favre. Opinion formation on evolving network: the DPA method applied to a nonlocal cross-diffusion PDE-ODE system. European Journal of Applied Mathematics, 35:748–775, 2024

work page 2024
[35]

Fornasier, J

M. Fornasier, J. Haškovec, and G. Toscani. Fluid dynamic description of flocking via the Povzner-Boltzmann equation. Physica d Nonlinear Phenomena , 240:21–31, 2011

work page 2011
[36]

Franceschi, L

J. Franceschi, L. Pareschi, E. Bellodi, M. Gavanelli, and M. Bresadola. Modeling opinion polarization on social media: application to COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy in Italy. PLoS ONE , 18:e0291993, 2023

work page 2023
[37]

Glasscock

D. Glasscock. What is... a graphon. Notices of the AMS , 62(1):46–48, 2015. 40

work page 2015
[38]

B. D. Goddard, B. Gooding, H. Short, and G. A. Pavliotis. Noisy bounded confidence models for opinion dynamics: the effect of boundary conditions on phase transitions. IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics , 87(1):80–110, 11 2021

work page 2021
[39]

Hegselmann and U

R. Hegselmann and U. Krause. Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: Models, analysis and simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation , 5(3), 2002

work page 2002
[40]

H. W. Hethcote. The mathematics of infectious diseases. SIAM review, 42(4):599–653, 2000

work page 2000
[41]

P. D. Hoff, A. E. Raftery, and M. S. Handcock. Latent space approaches to social network analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association , 97(460):1090–1098, 2002

work page 2002
[42]

Iacomini and P

E. Iacomini and P. Vellucci. Contrarian effect in opinion forming: Insights from Greta Thunberg phenomenon. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology , 47(2):123–169, 2023

work page 2023
[43]

Iotti, A

B. Iotti, A. Antonioni, S. Bullock, C. Darabos, M. Tomassini, and M. Giacobini. Infection dynamics on spatial small-world network models. Physical Review E , 96(5):052316, 2017

work page 2017
[44]

Jabin and S

P. Jabin and S. Motsch. Clustering and asymptotic behavior in opinion formation. Journal of Differential Equations , 257(11):4165–4187, 2014

work page 2014
[45]

D. G. Kendall. Deterministic and stochastic epidemics in closed populations. In Pro- ceedings of the third Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability , volume 4, pages 149–165. University of California Press Berkeley, CA, USA, 1956

work page 1956
[46]

W. O. Kermack and A. G. McKendrick. A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character , 115(772):700–721, 1927

work page 1927
[47]

J. Lee, J. Choi, C. Kim, and Y. Kim. Social media, network heterogeneity, and opinion polarization. Journal of Communication , 64:702–722, 2014

work page 2014
[48]

Li and H

T. Li and H. Zhu. Effect of the media on the opinion dynamics in online social networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , 551:124117, 2020

work page 2020
[49]

A. L. Lloyd and S. Valeika. Network models in epidemiology: an overview. Complex Population Dynamics: Nonlinear Modeling in Ecology, Epidemiology and Genetics , pages 189–214, 2007

work page 2007
[50]

Lovász and B

L. Lovász and B. Szegedy. Limits of dense graph sequences. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B , 96(6):933–957, 2006. 41

work page 2006
[51]

N. Loy, A. Tosin, et al. A viral load-based model for epidemic spread on spatial networks. Mathenatical Biosciences and Engineering , 18(5):5635–5663, 2021

work page 2021
[52]

Motsch and E

S. Motsch and E. Tadmor. Heterophilious dynamics enhances consensus. SIAM Review, 56:577–621, 2014

work page 2014
[53]

Naldi and G

G. Naldi and G. Patanè. On network-based epidemiological models: Analysis, sim- ulations, and continuum limit. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B , 34(0):243–274, 2026

work page 2026
[54]

Nowicki and T

K. Nowicki and T. A. B. Snijders. Estimation and prediction for stochastic block- structures. Journal of the American Statistical Association , 96(455):1077–1087, 2001

work page 2001
[55]

Nurisso, M

M. Nurisso, M. Raviola, and A. Tosin. Network-based kinetic models: Emergence of a statistical description of the graph topology. European Journal of Applied Mathe- matics, pages 1–22, 2024

work page 2024
[56]

Pareschi and G

L. Pareschi and G. Toscani. Interacting multiagent systems: kinetic equations and Monte Carlo methods . OUP Oxford, 2013

work page 2013
[57]

Pareschi, G

L. Pareschi, G. Toscani, A. Tosin, and M. Zanella. Hydrodynamic models of preference formation in multi-agent societies. Journal of Nonlinear Science , 29:2761–2796, 2019

work page 2019
[58]

Pareschi, P

L. Pareschi, P. Vellucci, and M. Zanella. Kinetic models of collective decision-making in the presence of equality bias. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications , 467:201–217, 2017

work page 2017
[59]

Pareschi and M

L. Pareschi and M. Zanella. Structure preserving schemes for nonlinear Fokker–Planck equations and applications. Journal of Scientific Computing , 74:1575–1600, 2018

work page 2018
[60]

Pastor-Satorras and A

R. Pastor-Satorras and A. Vespignani. Immunization of complex networks. Physical Review E , 65(3):036104, 2002

work page 2002
[61]

M. A. Saif, M. Shukri, and F. Al-makhedhi. SIR model on one dimensional small world networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications , 633:129430, 2024

work page 2024
[62]

Salathé and J

M. Salathé and J. H. Jones. Dynamics and control of diseases in networks with community structure. PLoS Computational Biology , 6(4):e1000736, 2010

work page 2010
[63]

H. A. Soufiani and E. Airoldi. Graphlet decomposition of a weighted network. In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , pages 54–63. PMLR, 2012

work page 2012
[64]

M. Sun, H. Zhang, H. Kang, G. Zhu, and X. Fu. Epidemic spreading on adaptively weighted scale-free networks. Journal of Mathematical Biology , 74:1263–1298, 2017. 42

work page 2017
[65]

G. Toscani. Kinetic models of opinion formation. Communications in Mathematical Sciences, 4:481–496, 2006

work page 2006
[66]

Toscani, A

G. Toscani, A. Tosin, and M. Zanella. Opinion modeling on social media and mar- keting aspects. Physical Review E , 98(2):022315, 2018

work page 2018
[67]

Tunçgenç, M

B. Tunçgenç, M. El Zein, J. Sulik, M. Newson, Y. Zhao, G. Dezecache, and O. Deroy. Social influence matters: We follow pandemic guidelines most when our close circle does. British Journal of Psychology , 112(3):763–780, 2021

work page 2021
[68]

Tversky and D

A. Tversky and D. Kahneman. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2):263–292, 1979

work page 1979
[69]

Van Der Hofstad

R. Van Der Hofstad. Random graphs and complex networks , volume 2. Cambridge University Press, 2024

work page 2024
[70]

X. F. Wang and G. Chen. Complex networks: small-world, scale-free and beyond. IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine , 3(1):6–20, 2003

work page 2003
[71]

Wasserman

L. Wasserman. All of nonparametric statistics . Springer, 2006

work page 2006
[72]

M. Zanella. Kinetic models for epidemic dynamics in the presence of opinion polar- ization. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology , 85, 2023

work page 2023
[73]

Zanella, C

M. Zanella, C. Bardelli, G. Dimarco, S. Deandrea, P. Perotti, M. Azzi, S. Figini, and G. Toscani. A data-driven epidemic model with social structure for understanding the COVID-19 infection on a heavily affected Italian Province. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences , 31(12):2533–2570, 2021. 43

work page 2021