pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.14751 · v1 · pith:4U5NUPNYnew · submitted 2026-05-14 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th

Scattering and depletion in a flying focus from conformal transformations

Tim Adamo , Anton Ilderton , Adam Noble This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 20:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-th
keywords flying focusconformal transformationsVolkov solutionsstrong-field QEDphoton emissionbeam depletionplane waves
0
0 comments X

The pith

Photon emission amplitudes in totally depleting flying focus beams equal Gaussian averages of the corresponding plane-wave amplitudes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that flying focus fields arise from complex conformal transformations of plane waves. Solutions of the massless wave equation in these fields are the corresponding conformal transformations of the Volkov solutions. Photon emission amplitudes in a totally depleting flying focus beam therefore follow directly from the plane-wave amplitudes by a Gaussian average over selected momentum variables. This supplies a route to incorporate focusing effects into strong-field QED calculations without further work. The method extends to partial depletion, with explicit results given in the anti-self-dual limit.

Core claim

Flying focus fields are obtained from complex conformal transformations of plane waves, and the solutions to the massless wave equation in these fields are the conformal transformations of the Volkov solutions. This implies that photon emission amplitudes in a totally depleting flying focus beam are computed directly from the corresponding plane wave amplitudes by a simple Gaussian average over certain momentum variables, providing a direct method to include focusing effects in strong-field QED.

What carries the argument

The complex conformal transformation that maps plane waves to flying focus fields and maps Volkov solutions to the corresponding solutions of the massless wave equation in those fields.

If this is right

  • Photon emission amplitudes in totally depleting flying focus beams reduce to Gaussian averages of the corresponding plane-wave amplitudes.
  • Focusing effects enter strong-field QED calculations through this averaging step at no extra computational cost.
  • The reduction applies when the flying focus beam is totally depleting.
  • Scattering amplitudes with only partial depletion can be treated by extension of the same conformal construction, with first results available in the anti-self-dual limit.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The Gaussian averaging step may simplify other observables beyond single-photon emission in strong laser backgrounds.
  • Analogous conformal mappings could reduce computational effort for different focused-beam profiles.
  • Numerical checks of the averaged amplitudes against direct integration in specific flying focus fields would provide an immediate test of the mapping.
  • The approach suggests that geometric transformations in field space can systematically lower the complexity of QED calculations in nonuniform backgrounds.

Load-bearing premise

The solutions of the massless wave equation in the flying focus fields obtained by complex conformal transformation are exactly the conformal transformations of the Volkov solutions.

What would settle it

A direct calculation of any photon emission amplitude inside a flying focus background that deviates from the Gaussian-averaged plane-wave result would disprove the central mapping.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.14751 by Adam Noble, Anton Ilderton, Tim Adamo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Left: sketch of the ‘seed’ plane wave electric fields corresponding to (23), plotted as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We show that flying focus fields can be obtained from complex conformal transformation of plane waves, and that solutions of the massless wave equation in the so-obtained fields are, correspondingly, conformal transformations of the Volkov solutions. This leads to the result that photon emission amplitudes in a totally depleting flying focus beam may be computed directly from the corresponding plane wave amplitudes by taking a simple Gaussian average over certain momentum variables. In effect, this gives a way of introducing focussing effects into strong-field QED calculations `for free'. The extension of these results to scattering amplitudes including only partial depletion is discussed and some first results presented in the anti-self-dual limit.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that flying focus fields arise from complex conformal transformations of plane waves, that solutions of the massless wave equation in these fields are exactly the conformal images of the corresponding Volkov solutions, and therefore that photon emission amplitudes in a totally depleting flying focus beam are obtained from the plane-wave amplitudes by a Gaussian average over momentum variables. The same logic is extended to scattering amplitudes with partial depletion in the anti-self-dual limit.

Significance. If the central mapping is shown to hold exactly, the result supplies a parameter-free route to incorporate focusing and depletion into strong-field QED amplitudes, converting existing plane-wave calculations into flying-focus results at essentially no extra cost. This would be a useful technical advance for laser-plasma and strong-field phenomenology.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (first two sentences) and the derivation of the transformed solutions: the assertion that the conformal image of a Volkov solution satisfies the massless wave equation in the image background is stated without an explicit verification. The complex character of the map, the required transformation law for the vector potential, and any Jacobian or measure factors must be checked to confirm that the equation is preserved exactly; without this step the reduction to a Gaussian average does not follow.
  2. [Abstract] The claim that amplitudes reduce to a Gaussian average over plane-wave results (abstract, third sentence) is load-bearing for the entire method. An explicit derivation or counter-term analysis showing that the complex conformal map introduces no additional phase or normalization factors that survive the average is required; the current presentation leaves this as an unverified step.
minor comments (1)
  1. The extension to partial depletion is mentioned only briefly; a short paragraph or appendix outlining the anti-self-dual construction would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and positive evaluation of the significance of our results. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarifications and explicit derivations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (first two sentences) and the derivation of the transformed solutions: the assertion that the conformal image of a Volkov solution satisfies the massless wave equation in the image background is stated without an explicit verification. The complex character of the map, the required transformation law for the vector potential, and any Jacobian or measure factors must be checked to confirm that the equation is preserved exactly; without this step the reduction to a Gaussian average does not follow.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of the preservation of the wave equation under the complex conformal transformation is important for rigor. In the revised manuscript, we will add a dedicated subsection or appendix providing this verification, including the transformation properties of the vector potential under the conformal map and confirmation that Jacobian factors do not introduce additional complications for the solutions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The claim that amplitudes reduce to a Gaussian average over plane-wave results (abstract, third sentence) is load-bearing for the entire method. An explicit derivation or counter-term analysis showing that the complex conformal map introduces no additional phase or normalization factors that survive the average is required; the current presentation leaves this as an unverified step.

    Authors: We will include an explicit step-by-step derivation of how the photon emission amplitude in the flying focus background reduces to the Gaussian average over the plane-wave amplitudes. This will demonstrate that the complex nature of the map does not introduce surviving phase or normalization factors, by direct computation from the transformed solutions. The revised paper will contain this derivation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation applies external conformal properties to standard Volkov solutions

full rationale

The paper's central step invokes the mathematical action of complex conformal transformations on plane-wave backgrounds and their Volkov solutions to obtain the flying-focus fields and amplitudes. This mapping is presented as a direct consequence of the transformation properties of the massless wave equation, not as a definition, fit, or result imported solely via self-citation. The subsequent Gaussian averaging of amplitudes follows from that mapping without reducing any output quantity to an input parameter by construction. No load-bearing premise collapses to a prior paper by the same authors; the result remains self-contained against external mathematical benchmarks on conformal transformations and Volkov states.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the preservation of the massless wave equation under complex conformal transformations and on the known form of Volkov solutions; both are standard in the literature and not introduced ad hoc here. No free parameters or new entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Complex conformal transformations map solutions of the massless wave equation to other solutions of the same equation.
    Invoked to obtain flying focus fields from plane waves and to map Volkov solutions accordingly.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5629 in / 1255 out tokens · 27789 ms · 2026-06-30T20:30:59.605223+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · 21 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Abramowiczet al., Eur

    H. Abramowiczet al., Eur. Phys. J. ST230, 2445 (2021), arXiv:2102.02032 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  2. [2]

    Sarriet al., Eur

    G. Sarriet al., Eur. Phys. J. Plus140, 1151 (2025), arXiv:2504.02608 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    E. E. Loset al., Nature Commun.17, 1157 (2026), arXiv:2407.12071 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  4. [4]

    Gonoskov, T

    A. Gonoskov, T. G. Blackburn, M. Marklund, and S. S. Bulanov, Rev. Mod. Phys.94, 045001 (2022), arXiv:2107.02161 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Fedotov, A

    A. Fedotov, A. Ilderton, F. Karbstein, B. King, D. Seipt, H. Taya, and G. Torgrimsson, Phys. Rept.1010, 1 (2023), arXiv:2203.00019 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    W. H. Furry, Phys. Rev.81, 115 (1951)

    1951

  7. [7]

    D. M. Wolkow, Z. Phys.94, 250 (1935)

    1935

  8. [8]

    Volkov States and Non-linear Compton Scattering in Short and Intense Laser Pulses

    D. Seipt, inQuantum Field Theory at the Limits: from Strong Fields to Heavy Quarks(2017) pp. 24–43, arXiv:1701.03692 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    A. M. Fedotov, Laser Physics19, 214 (2009)

    2009

  10. [10]

    H. Gies, F. Karbstein, and N. Seegert, New J. Phys.15, 083002 (2013), arXiv:1305.2320 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  11. [11]

    Probing nonperturbative QED with optimally focused laser pulses

    A. Gonoskov, I. Gonoskov, C. Harvey, A. Ilderton, A. Kim, M. Marklund, G. Mourou, and A. M. Sergeev, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 060404 (2013), arXiv:1302.4653 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  12. [12]

    Exact classical and quantum dynamics in background electromagnetic fields

    T. Heinzl and A. Ilderton, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 113202 (2017), arXiv:1701.09166 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  13. [13]

    Karbstein, A

    F. Karbstein, A. Blinne, H. Gies, and M. Zepf, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 091802 (2019), arXiv:1905.00858 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    Di Piazza, Phys

    A. Di Piazza, Phys. Rev. A103, 012215 (2021)

    2021

  15. [15]

    Degli Esposti and G

    G. Degli Esposti and G. Torgrimsson, Phys. Rev. D109, 016013 (2024), arXiv:2308.01659 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Back-reflection in dipole fields and beyond

    M. Valialshchikov, F. Karbstein, D. Seipt, and M. Zepf, Phys. Rev. D112, 116012 (2025), arXiv:2510.11764 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    J. N. Brittingham, Journal of Applied Physics54, 1179 (1983)

    1983

  18. [18]

    Sezginer, Journal of Applied Physics57, 678 (1985)

    A. Sezginer, Journal of Applied Physics57, 678 (1985)

    1985

  19. [19]

    Hillion, Wave Motion10, 143 (1988)

    P. Hillion, Wave Motion10, 143 (1988)

    1988

  20. [20]

    Hillion, Journal of Mathematical Physics33, 2749 (1992)

    P. Hillion, Journal of Mathematical Physics33, 2749 (1992)

    1992

  21. [21]

    D. H. Froula, D. Turnbull, A. S. Davies, T. J. Kessler, D. Haberberger, J. P. Palastro, S.-W. Bahk, I. A. Begishev, R. Boni, S. Bucht, J. Katz, and J. L. Shaw, Nature Photonics12, 262 (2018). 16

    2018

  22. [22]

    S. W. Jolly, O. Gobert, A. Jeandet, and F. Qu´ er´ e, Opt. Express28, 4888 (2020)

    2020

  23. [23]

    Kabacinski, E

    A. Kabacinski, E. Oliva, F. Tissandier, J. Gautier, M. Kozlov´ a, J.-P. Goddet, I. A. Andriyash, C. Thaury, P. Zeitoun, and S. Sebban, Nature Photonics17, 354 (2023)

    2023

  24. [24]

    S. Fu, B. Groussin, Y. Liu, A. Mysyrowicz, V. Tikhonchuk, and A. Houard, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 045001 (2025)

    2025

  25. [25]

    Formanek, D

    M. Formanek, D. Ramsey, J. P. Palastro, and A. Di Piazza, Phys. Rev. A105, L020203 (2022), arXiv:2108.09651 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Formanek, J

    M. Formanek, J. P. Palastro, D. Ramsey, S. Weber, and A. Di Piazza, Phys. Rev. D109, 056009 (2024), arXiv:2307.11734 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Adamo and A

    T. Adamo and A. Ilderton, Phys. Rev. D111, 125005 (2025), arXiv:2501.06109 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    A Modern Approach to Superradiance

    S. Endlich and R. Penco, JHEP05, 052 (2017), arXiv:1609.06723 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  29. [29]

    Back-reaction on background fields: a coherent state approach

    A. Ilderton and D. Seipt, Phys. Rev. D97, 016007 (2018), arXiv:1709.10085 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  30. [30]

    Aoude and A

    R. Aoude and A. Ochirov, JHEP12, 103 (2023), arXiv:2307.07504 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    Depletion of intense fields

    D. Seipt, T. Heinzl, M. Marklund, and S. S. Bulanov, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 154803 (2017), arXiv:1605.00633 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    L. M. Frantz, Phys. Rev.139, B1326 (1965)

    1965

  33. [33]

    T. W. B. Kibble, Phys. Rev.138, B740 (1965)

    1965

  34. [34]

    J. S. Schwinger, Phys. Rev.82, 664 (1951)

    1951

  35. [35]

    Any geometry has a plane-wave limit,

    R. Penrose, “Any geometry has a plane-wave limit,” inDifferential Geometry and Relativity, edited by M. Cahen and M. Flato (Reidel: Dordrecht, 1976) p. 271

    1976

  36. [36]

    P. G. Bergmann and E. J. Flaherty, J. Math. Phys.19, 212 (1978)

    1978

  37. [37]

    Trautman, J

    A. Trautman, J. Phys. A13, L1 (1980)

    1980

  38. [38]

    Superintegrable relativistic systems in spacetime-dependent background fields

    T. Heinzl and A. Ilderton, J. Phys. A50, 345204 (2017), arXiv:1701.09168 [math-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  39. [39]

    Scattering on plane waves and the double copy

    T. Adamo, E. Casali, L. Mason, and S. Nekovar, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 015004 (2018), arXiv:1706.08925 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  40. [40]

    V. I. Ritus, J. Russ. Laser Res.6, 497 (1985)

    1985

  41. [41]

    A. M. Fedotov and A. A. Mironov, Phys. Rev. A88, 062110 (2013), arXiv:1310.7258 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  42. [42]

    Ilderton, Phys

    A. Ilderton, Phys. Rev. D100, 125018 (2019), arXiv:1909.02484 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  43. [43]

    Ilderton and H

    A. Ilderton and H. Kingham, Phys. Rev. D110, 105022 (2024), arXiv:2409.01372 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    A. J. MacLeod,private communication(2026)

    2026

  45. [45]

    Bateman, Proc

    H. Bateman, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. s2-7, 70 (1909)

    1909

  46. [46]

    Radiation damping in conformally flat universes,

    J. M. Hobbs, “Radiation damping in conformally flat universes,” (1968)

    1968

  47. [47]

    Noble, D

    A. Noble, D. A. Burton, L. Docherty, and D. A. Jaroszynski, New J. Phys.23, 115007 (2021), arXiv:2110.15786 [physics.class-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    Cunningham, Proc

    E. Cunningham, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. s2-8, 77 (1910)

    1910

  49. [49]

    Bateman, Proc

    H. Bateman, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. s2-8, 223 (1910)

    1910

  50. [50]

    Cristofoli, A

    A. Cristofoli, A. Elkhidir, A. Ilderton, and D. O’Connell, JHEP06, 204 (2023), arXiv:2211.16438 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    Di Piazza, M

    A. Di Piazza, M. Formanek, D. Ramsey, and J. P. Palastro, (2024), arXiv:2409.15025 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Arbitrary-Velocity Volkov Wavepackets

    D. Ramsey, J. McKeown, and J. P. Palastro, (2026), arXiv:2604.11503 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  53. [53]

    Ramsey, A

    D. Ramsey, A. Di Piazza, M. Formanek, P. Franke, D. H. Froula, B. Malaca, W. B. Mori, J. R. Pierce, T. T. Simpson, J. Vieira, M. Vranic, K. Weichman, and J. P. Palastro, Physical Review A107(2023), 10.1103/physreva.107.013513

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.107.013513 2023

  54. [54]

    Formanek, J

    M. Formanek, J. P. Palastro, M. Vranic, D. Ramsey, and A. Di Piazza, Phys. Rev. E107, 055213 (2023), arXiv:2301.08186 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  55. [55]

    V. Dinu, T. Heinzl, and A. Ilderton, Phys. Rev. D86, 085037 (2012), arXiv:1206.3957 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  56. [56]

    Boca and V

    M. Boca and V. Florescu, Phys. Rev. A80, 053403 (2009)

    2009

  57. [57]

    An electromagnetic analog of gravitational wave memory

    L. Bieri and D. Garfinkle, Class. Quant. Grav.30, 195009 (2013), arXiv:1307.5098 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  58. [58]

    G. V. Dunne and C. Schubert, Phys. Lett. B526, 55 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0111134

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  59. [59]

    G. V. Dunne and C. Schubert, JHEP08, 053 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0205004

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  60. [60]

    G. V. Dunne and C. Schubert, JHEP06, 042 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0205005

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  61. [61]

    Adamo, L

    T. Adamo, L. Mason, and A. Sharma, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 041602 (2020), arXiv:2003.13501 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  62. [62]

    Adamo, L

    T. Adamo, L. Mason, and A. Sharma, Commun. Math. Phys.399, 1731 (2023), arXiv:2010.14996 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  63. [63]

    Adamo, L

    T. Adamo, L. Mason, and A. Sharma, Class. Quant. Grav.40, 095002 (2023), arXiv:2203.02238 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  64. [64]

    Costello, N

    K. Costello, N. M. Paquette, and A. Sharma, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 061602 (2023), arXiv:2208.14233 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    Bogna and L

    G. Bogna and L. Mason, JHEP08, 165 (2023), arXiv:2305.07542 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Adamo, G

    T. Adamo, G. Bogna, L. Mason, and A. Sharma, Class. Quant. Grav.41, 015030 (2024), arXiv:2309.03834 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  67. [67]

    Guevara and U

    A. Guevara and U. Kol, (2023), arXiv:2311.07933 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    Adamo, G

    T. Adamo, G. Bogna, L. Mason, and A. Sharma, Lett. Math. Phys.115, 18 (2025), arXiv:2406.09165 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    Garner and N

    N. Garner and N. M. Paquette, JHEP05, 228 (2025), arXiv:2408.11092 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    Guevara, U

    A. Guevara, U. Kol, and H. Tran, (2024), arXiv:2412.19627 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    Self-Dual Gauge Theory from the Top Down

    R. Bittleston, K. Costello, and K. Zeng, Commun. Math. Phys.407, 108 (2026), arXiv:2412.02680 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  72. [72]

    Graviton scattering on self-dual black holes

    T. Adamo, G. Bogna, L. Mason, and A. Sharma, Class. Quant. Grav.43, 055005 (2026), arXiv:2507.18605 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  73. [73]

    Bittleston and K

    R. Bittleston and K. Costello, (2026), arXiv:2602.17538 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  74. [74]

    G. R. Brown, J. Gowdy, and B. Spence, Phys. Rev. D109, 026009 (2024), arXiv:2307.11063 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  75. [75]

    Kim, Phys

    J.-H. Kim, Phys. Rev. D111, L021703 (2025), arXiv:2405.09518 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    Ilderton and W

    A. Ilderton and W. Lindved, JHEP09, 156 (2025), arXiv:2505.16852 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    The One-Loop QCD $\beta$-Function as an Index

    R. Bittleston and K. Costello, (2025), arXiv:2510.26764 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    K. J. Costello, JHEP08, 011 (2025), arXiv:2302.00770 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    L. J. Dixon and A. Morales, JHEP08, 129 (2024), arXiv:2407.13967 [hep-th]. 17

    work page arXiv 2024

  80. [80]

    L. J. Dixon and A. Morales, JHEP03, 188 (2025), arXiv:2411.10967 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.