pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15521 · v1 · pith:AAWBHZG2new · submitted 2026-05-15 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · quant-ph

Entropy Production from Spin--Vibrational Coupling in Endohedral-Fullerene Qubits Encapsulated in Suspended Carbon Nanotubes

Cristian Staii This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 15:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall quant-ph
keywords entropy productionspin-phonon couplingcarbon nanotube resonatorsendohedral fullerenesJaynes-Cummings interactionLindblad master equationnonequilibrium thermodynamicsquantum irreversibility
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spin-vibrational coupling in nanotube-encapsulated fullerene qubits produces crossovers between oscillator-dominated and spin-dominated entropy production.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper models a hybrid system of paramagnetic endohedral fullerenes such as N@C60 inside a suspended carbon nanotube resonator, treating selected spin states as qubits coupled to quantized flexural vibrations. It builds an open-system description that combines driven quantum Brownian motion of the resonator, represented via Wigner functions and Gaussian propagators, with an effective Jaynes-Cummings interaction inside a Lindblad master equation that includes damping, relaxation, dephasing, and thermal excitation. The analysis derives the entropy balance and shows that magnetic-gradient-enhanced spin-phonon coupling, resonant driving, and moderate thermal occupation shift the dominant source of entropy production from the mechanical oscillator to the spin subsystem. A sympathetic reader would care because the setup offers a controllable nanoscale platform for examining how hybridization redistributes irreversibility between coherent exchange and dissipative channels. The work thereby connects quantum thermodynamics to information flow in structured vibrational environments.

Core claim

Using a phase-space description of the driven damped CNT resonator together with a Lindblad master equation for the coupled spin-vibrational dynamics, the paper derives the entropy balance and identifies entropy flux and non-negative entropy production, demonstrating that magnetic-gradient-enhanced spin-phonon coupling, resonant driving, and moderate thermal occupation produce crossovers between oscillator-dominated and spin-dominated entropy-production regimes.

What carries the argument

Effective Jaynes-Cummings spin-vibrational interaction embedded in a Lindblad master equation, combined with analytic Gaussian propagators for the Wigner function evolution of the driven damped oscillator.

If this is right

  • Entropy flux and non-negative entropy production can be separated and tracked through the hybrid dynamics.
  • Spin-vibrational hybridization redistributes irreversibility between coherent exchange and dissipative channels.
  • The dominant contribution to entropy production crosses over from the oscillator to the spin subsystem under enhanced coupling, resonant drive, and moderate thermal occupation.
  • The CNT-PEF hybrid provides a platform for studying nonequilibrium quantum thermodynamics, decoherence, and information loss in vibrational environments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the regime crossovers are observed, these hybrids could function as tunable testbeds for controlling heat dissipation or erasure of information at the nanoscale.
  • The phase-space approach might extend naturally to multi-spin or multi-mode configurations to explore collective effects on entropy flow.
  • Calorimetric or noise measurements on suspended nanotubes could provide direct experimental access to the predicted entropy production rates.

Load-bearing premise

The coupled spin-mechanical system is accurately captured by an effective Jaynes-Cummings interaction inside a Lindblad master equation that incorporates mechanical damping, spin relaxation, pure dephasing, and thermally activated excitation.

What would settle it

An experiment that varies the applied magnetic field gradient or drive frequency while measuring entropy production rates in the suspended CNT-fullerene device and finds no switch between mechanical and spin dominated regimes would falsify the predicted crossovers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.15521 by Cristian Staii.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Reduced mechanical Wigner function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Entropy-flux dynamics in the resonant weak-drive regime for two representative values of the spin–phonon coupling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Diffusion-broadened reduced mechanical Wigner function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Left panel: reduced mechanical entropy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Diffusion-broadened reduced mechanical Wigner function in the strong-drive regime, shown in phase-space coordinates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Hybrid carbon nanotube-fullerene architectures provide a controllable platform for studying irreversibility and information flow in structured quantum environments. We analyze entropy generation in a system where paramagnetic endohedral fullerenes, such as N@C$_{60}$ and P@C$_{60}$, are encapsulated inside a suspended carbon nanotube (CNT) resonator, with selected multi-level fullerene spin states forming an effective qubit coupled to quantized CNT flexural modes. Building on prior work on fullerene-filled CNTs, spin-phonon control in suspended nanotubes, and phase-space propagators for damped driven oscillators, we develop a hybrid open-system model combining driven quantum Brownian motion of the CNT with an effective Jaynes-Cummings spin-vibrational interaction. The resonator dynamics are represented by a Wigner function whose evolution is written analytically in terms of the initial Wigner distribution and a Gaussian propagator. This phase-space description separates drive-induced displacement, diffusion, and damping, and connects these processes directly to entropy flow. The coupled spin-mechanical dynamics are embedded in a Lindblad master equation including mechanical damping, spin relaxation, pure dephasing, and thermally activated excitation. Within this framework we derive the entropy balance, identify entropy flux and non-negative entropy production, and examine how spin-vibrational hybridization redistributes irreversibility between coherent exchange and dissipative channels. We show that magnetic-gradient-enhanced spin-phonon coupling, resonant driving, and moderate thermal occupation produce crossovers between oscillator-dominated and spin-dominated entropy-production regimes. The framework provides a basis for using CNT-PEF hybrids as nanoscale platforms to study nonequilibrium quantum thermodynamics, decoherence, and information loss in vibrational environments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a hybrid open-system model for paramagnetic endohedral fullerenes (N@C60, P@C60) encapsulated in suspended carbon nanotube resonators. It combines an analytic Gaussian Wigner propagator for the driven damped flexural modes with a Lindblad master equation that includes an effective Jaynes-Cummings spin-vibrational interaction, mechanical damping, spin relaxation, pure dephasing, and thermal excitation. From this framework the authors derive the entropy balance, separate flux and production terms, and predict crossovers between oscillator-dominated and spin-dominated entropy-production regimes under magnetic-gradient-enhanced coupling, resonant driving, and moderate thermal occupation.

Significance. If the hybrid construction remains valid, the work supplies a concrete theoretical platform for nonequilibrium quantum thermodynamics in hybrid spin-mechanical systems. The phase-space treatment that directly links drive, diffusion, and damping to mechanical entropy flow is a clear methodological strength and could guide future experiments on information loss and decoherence in nanotube-based qubits.

major comments (2)
  1. [Hybrid Wigner-Lindblad construction and entropy-balance derivation] The separation of entropy flux into mechanical (drive/diffusion/damping) and spin channels, which underpins the reported oscillator-to-spin crossover, rests on the resonator remaining Gaussian. The Jaynes-Cummings term inside the Lindblad equation can generate spin back-action that produces squeezing or entanglement, especially at moderate thermal occupation where the crossover is claimed. No explicit bound or numerical test confirming that the closed-form Gaussian propagator remains accurate to the required precision is provided; this assumption is load-bearing for the central regime-separation result.
  2. [Entropy balance and production terms] The non-negativity of entropy production is asserted after embedding the spin-vibrational coupling in the Lindblad form, yet the hybrid analytic-plus-numerical treatment requires that interaction-induced correlations do not mix the mechanical and spin entropy channels. The manuscript should supply the explicit expressions for the mechanical entropy flux (from the Wigner propagator) and the spin-channel contributions (from the Lindblad dissipators) and verify their additivity under the stated parameter regime.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract cites 'prior work on fullerene-filled CNTs, spin-phonon control in suspended nanotubes, and phase-space propagators' without specific references; inserting the relevant citations would improve traceability.
  2. Notation for the entropy flux versus production rates should be introduced with a short table or explicit equations early in the text to aid readers who are not specialists in open-system thermodynamics.
  3. Any figures showing the crossover should label the precise values of magnetic gradient, drive amplitude, and thermal occupation used, together with the criterion employed to demarcate the two regimes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and outline the revisions we plan to implement to strengthen the presentation and validation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The separation of entropy flux into mechanical (drive/diffusion/damping) and spin channels, which underpins the reported oscillator-to-spin crossover, rests on the resonator remaining Gaussian. The Jaynes-Cummings term inside the Lindblad equation can generate spin back-action that produces squeezing or entanglement, especially at moderate thermal occupation where the crossover is claimed. No explicit bound or numerical test confirming that the closed-form Gaussian propagator remains accurate to the required precision is provided; this assumption is load-bearing for the central regime-separation result.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee pointing out the importance of validating the Gaussian approximation for the mechanical resonator. In our hybrid model, the Wigner propagator is derived analytically for the driven damped oscillator under the assumption that the spin back-action remains weak. For the parameter regimes where the oscillator-to-spin crossover is observed, the effective coupling is such that non-Gaussian corrections are small. Nevertheless, to rigorously address this concern, we will add a section in the revised manuscript providing an error bound based on perturbative analysis of the back-action and, where feasible, numerical comparisons with the full Lindblad evolution for representative cases. This will confirm the validity of the approximation in the relevant regime. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The non-negativity of entropy production is asserted after embedding the spin-vibrational coupling in the Lindblad form, yet the hybrid analytic-plus-numerical treatment requires that interaction-induced correlations do not mix the mechanical and spin entropy channels. The manuscript should supply the explicit expressions for the mechanical entropy flux (from the Wigner propagator) and the spin-channel contributions (from the Lindblad dissipators) and verify their additivity under the stated parameter regime.

    Authors: We agree that providing explicit expressions will improve the clarity of the entropy balance derivation. In the revised manuscript, we will include the full expressions for the mechanical entropy flux obtained from the Gaussian Wigner propagator, detailing the contributions from the drive, diffusion, and damping terms. Similarly, we will explicitly write the spin-channel entropy production rates arising from the various Lindblad dissipators. Regarding additivity, we will demonstrate that under the weak spin-vibrational coupling and separation of mechanical and spin timescales employed in our model, the cross-correlation terms average to zero or remain negligible, preserving the separation of channels. This verification will be supported by the structure of the hybrid equations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper constructs a hybrid model by combining a standard Gaussian Wigner propagator for the driven damped CNT resonator with a Lindblad master equation that incorporates the effective Jaynes-Cummings spin-vibrational coupling plus standard dissipators. Entropy balance, flux, and production are obtained directly from these established open-system formalisms. The reported crossovers between oscillator- and spin-dominated regimes are computed outcomes of the model dynamics rather than quantities defined in terms of themselves or statistically forced by parameter fitting. References to prior work supply background context but do not carry the load of the central claims through self-referential reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available, so ledger is limited to elements explicitly named; standard quantum mechanics and Lindblad form are assumed without independent verification here.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The resonator dynamics admit an analytic Gaussian propagator for the Wigner function that separates drive, diffusion, and damping.
    Invoked in the phase-space description of the CNT.
  • domain assumption The coupled dynamics are captured by a Lindblad master equation with mechanical damping, spin relaxation, pure dephasing, and thermal excitation terms.
    Stated as the framework for embedding spin-mechanical dynamics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5834 in / 1283 out tokens · 55091 ms · 2026-05-19T15:00:57.335213+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    G. T. Landi and M. Paternostro, Irreversible entropy pro- duction, from quantum to classical, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 035008 (2021), arXiv:2009.07668 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  2. [2]

    W. H. Zurek, Decoherence, einselection, and the quan- tum origins of the classical, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 715 (2003), arXiv:quant-ph/0105127

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  3. [3]

    Schlosshauer,Decoherence and the Quantum-To- Classical Transition, Frontiers Collection (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007)

    M. Schlosshauer,Decoherence and the Quantum-To- Classical Transition, Frontiers Collection (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007)

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    N. R. Lee, Y. Guo, A. Y. Cleland, E. A. Wollack, R. G. Gruenke, T. Makihara, Z. Wang, T. Rajabzadeh, W. Jiang, F. M. Mayor, P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, C. J. Sara- balis, and A. H. Safavi-Naeini, Strong Dispersive Cou- pling Between a Mechanical Resonator and a Fluxo- nium Superconducting Qubit, PRX Quantum4, 040342 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Samanta, S

    C. Samanta, S. L. De Bonis, C. B. Møller, R. Tormo- Queralt, W. Yang, C. Urgell, B. Stamenic, B. Thibeault, Y. Jin, D. A. Czaplewski, F. Pistolesi, and A. Bachtold, Nonlinear nanomechanical resonators approaching the quantum ground state, Nature Physics19, 1340 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    E. A. Wollack, A. Y. Cleland, R. G. Gruenke, Z. Wang, P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, and A. H. Safavi-Naeini, Quantum state preparation and tomography of entangled mechan- ical resonators, Nature604, 463 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Rossi, D

    M. Rossi, D. Mason, J. Chen, Y. Tsaturyan, and A. Schliesser, Measurement-based quantum control of mechanical motion, Nature563, 53 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Blencowe, Quantum electromechanical systems, Physics Reports395, 159 (2004)

    M. Blencowe, Quantum electromechanical systems, Physics Reports395, 159 (2004). 14

    work page 2004

  9. [9]

    M. D. LaHaye, O. Buu, B. Camarota, and K. C. Schwab, Approaching the quantum limit of a nanomechanical res- onator, Science304, 74 (2004)

    work page 2004

  10. [10]

    P´ alyi, P

    A. P´ alyi, P. R. Struck, M. Rudner, K. Flensberg, and G. Burkard, Spin-Orbit-Induced Strong Coupling of a Single Spin to a Nanomechanical Resonator, Physical Re- view Letters108, 206811 (2012)

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    Wang and G

    H. Wang and G. Burkard, Creating arbitrary quantum vibrational states in a carbon nanotube, Physical Review B94, 205413 (2016)

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    X. Wang, A. Miranowicz, H.-R. Li, and F. Nori, Method for observing robust and tunable phonon blockade in a nanomechanical resonator coupled to a charge qubit, Physical Review A93, 063861 (2016)

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    Boissonneault, J

    M. Boissonneault, J. M. Gambetta, and A. Blais, Dis- persive regime of circuit QED: Photon-dependent qubit dephasing and relaxation rates, Physical Review A79, 013819 (2009)

    work page 2009

  14. [14]

    W. Cui, Z. Zhang, and K. Mølmer, Feedback control of rabi oscillations in circuit qed, Physical Review A88, 063823 (2013)

    work page 2013

  15. [15]

    Rist` e, J

    D. Rist` e, J. G. van Leeuwen, H.-S. Ku, K. W. Lehnert, and L. DiCarlo, Initialization by measurement of a super- conducting quantum bit circuit, Physical Review Letters 109, 050507 (2012)

    work page 2012

  16. [16]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Reviews of Modern Physics86, 1391 (2014)

    work page 2014

  17. [17]

    Pietzak, A

    B. Pietzak, A. Weidinger, K.-P. Dinse, and A. Hirsch, Endofullerenes, inEndofullerenes: A New Family of Carbon Clusters, edited by T. Akasaka and S. Nagase (Springer Netherlands, 2002) pp. 13–65

    work page 2002

  18. [18]

    Porfyrakis, Endohedral fullerenes, inEndohedral Fullerenes: Electron Transfer and Spin, edited by A

    K. Porfyrakis, Endohedral fullerenes, inEndohedral Fullerenes: Electron Transfer and Spin, edited by A. A. Popov (Springer, 2016)

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    J. J. L. Morton, A. M. Tyryshkin, A. Ardavan, K. Porfyrakis, S. A. Lyon, and G. A. D. Briggs, Elec- tron spin relaxation of N@C60 in CS2, The Journal of Chemical Physics124, 014508 (2006)

    work page 2006

  20. [20]

    Simon, H

    F. Simon, H. Kuzmany, H. Rauf, A. Pichler, A. J´ anossy, F. Hauke, A. Hirsch, and B. Bern´ e, Low temperature fullerene encapsulation in single wall carbon nanotubes: Synthesis of N@C60@SWCNT, Chemical Physics Letters 383, 362 (2004)

    work page 2004

  21. [21]

    Eckardt, R

    M. Eckardt, R. Wieczorek, and W. Harneit, Stability of C60 and N@C60 under thermal and optical exposure, Carbon95, 601 (2015)

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    Waiblinger, K

    M. Waiblinger, K. Lips, W. Harneit, A. Weidinger, E. Di- etel, and A. Hirsch, Thermal stability of the endohedral fullerenes N@C60, N@C70, and P@C60, Physical Review B64, 159901 (2001)

    work page 2001

  23. [23]

    J. J. L. Morton, A. M. Tyryshkin, A. Ardavan, K. Porfyrakis, S. A. Lyon, and G. A. D. Briggs, Envi- ronmental effects on electron spin relaxation in N@C60, Physical Review B76, 085418 (2007)

    work page 2007

  24. [24]

    Harneit, Spin quantum computing with endohedral fullerenes, inEndohedral Fullerenes: Electron Transfer and Spin, Nanostructure Science and Technology, edited by A

    W. Harneit, Spin quantum computing with endohedral fullerenes, inEndohedral Fullerenes: Electron Transfer and Spin, Nanostructure Science and Technology, edited by A. A. Popov (Springer, 2017) Chap. 14

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    Rips and M

    S. Rips and M. J. Hartmann, Quantum information pro- cessing with nanomechanical qubits, Physical Review Letters110, 120503 (2013)

    work page 2013

  26. [26]

    Pinto, D

    D. Pinto, D. Paone, M. Kern, P. Dierker, R. Wieczorek, A. Singha, D. B. R. Dasari, A. Finkler, W. Harneit, J. Wrachtrup, and K. Kern, Readout and control of an endofullerene electronic spin, Nature Communications 11, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Sazonova, Y

    V. Sazonova, Y. Yaish, H. Ust¨ unel, D. Roundy, T. A. Arias, and P. L. McEuen, A tunable carbon nanotube electromechanical oscillator, Nature431, 284 (2004)

    work page 2004

  28. [28]

    Garcia-Sanchez, A

    D. Garcia-Sanchez, A. San Paulo, M. J. Esplandiu, F. Perez-Murano, L. Forr´ o, A. Aguasca, and A. Bachtold, Mechanical Detection of Carbon Nanotube Resonator Vi- brations, Physical Review Letters99, 085501 (2007)

    work page 2007

  29. [29]

    A. K. H¨ uttel, M. Poot, B. Witkamp, and H. S. J. van der Zant, Nanoelectromechanics of suspended carbon nan- otubes, New Journal of Physics10, 095003 (2008)

    work page 2008

  30. [30]

    Staii, R

    C. Staii, R. Shao, D. Bonnell, and A. T. Johnson, High frequency scanning gate microscopy and local memory effect of carbon nanotube transistors, Nano Letters5, 893 (2005)

    work page 2005

  31. [31]

    Staii, M

    C. Staii, M. Chen, A. Gelperin, and A. T. Johnson, Dna- decorated carbon nanotubes for chemical sensing, Nano Letters5, 1774 (2005)

    work page 2005

  32. [32]

    Eichler, J

    A. Eichler, J. Moser, J. Chaste, M. Zdrojek, I. Wilson- Rae, and A. Bachtold, Nonlinear damping in mechanical resonators made from carbon nanotubes and graphene, Nature Nanotechnology6, 339 (2011)

    work page 2011

  33. [33]

    Tavernarakis, A

    A. Tavernarakis, A. Stavrinadis, A. Nowak, I. Tsioutsios, A. Bachtold, and P. Verlot, Optomechanics with a hybrid carbon nanotube resonator, Nature Communications9, 662 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    B. H. Schneider, V. Singh, W. J. Venstra, H. B. Meer- waldt, and G. A. Steele, Observation of decoherence in a carbon nanotube mechanical resonator, Nature Commu- nications5, 5819 (2014)

    work page 2014

  35. [35]

    Sarma and A

    B. Sarma and A. K. Sarma, Tunable phonon blockade in weakly nonlinear coupled mechanical resonators via coulomb interaction, Scientific Reports8, 14583 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    X. Wang, A. Miranowicz, H.-R. Li, and F. Nori, Hybrid quantum device with a carbon nanotube and a flux qubit for dissipative quantum engineering, Physical Review B 95, 205415 (2017)

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    F. L. Semi˜ ao, K. Furuya, and G. J. Milburn, Kerr non- linearities and nonclassical states with superconducting qubits and nanomechanical resonators, Physical Review A79, 063811 (2009)

    work page 2009

  38. [38]

    S. Rips, I. Wilson-Rae, and M. J. Hartmann, Nonlinear nanomechanical resonators for quantum optoelectrome- chanics, Physical Review A89, 013854 (2014)

    work page 2014

  39. [39]

    G. A. Steele, A. K. H¨ uttel, B. Witkamp, M. Poot, H. B. Meerwaldt, L. P. Kouwenhoven, and H. S. J. van der Zant, Strong coupling between single-electron tunneling and nanomechanical motion, Science325, 1103 (2009)

    work page 2009

  40. [40]

    Willick, X

    K. Willick, X. S. Tang, and J. Baugh, Probing the non-linear transient response of a carbon nanotube me- chanical oscillator, Applied Physics Letters111, 223108 (2017)

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    Urgell, W

    C. Urgell, W. Yang, S. L. De Bonis, C. Samanta, M. J. Esplandiu, Q. Dong, Y. Jin, and A. Bachtold, Cooling and self-oscillation in a nanotube electromechanical res- onator, Nat. Phys.16, 32 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    G. W. Ford and R. F. O’Connell, Exact solution of the hu-paz-zhang master equation, Phys. Rev. D64, 105020 (2001)

    work page 2001

  43. [43]

    Qiu and H.-T

    T. Qiu and H.-T. Quan, Quantum corrections to the en- tropy in a driven quantum brownian motion model, Com- munications in Theoretical Physics73, 095602 (2021). 15

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems, 1st ed. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2009)

    work page 2009

  45. [45]

    Chang, N

    J. Chang, N. Pietrzak, and C. Staii, Quantum tomogra- phy of suspended carbon nanotubes, Phys. Rev. B113, 155436 (2026)

    work page 2026

  46. [46]

    Weinbub and D

    J. Weinbub and D. K. Ferry, Recent advances in Wigner function approaches, Applied Physics Reviews5, 041104 (2018)

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    W. B. Case, Wigner functions and Weyl transforms for pedestrians, American Journal of Physics76, 937 (2008)

    work page 2008

  48. [48]

    Bertet, A

    P. Bertet, A. Auffeves, P. Maioli, S. Osnaghi, T. Meunier, M. Brune, J. M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Direct Mea- surement of the Wigner Function of a One-Photon Fock State in a Cavity, Physical Review Letters89, 200402 (2002)

    work page 2002

  49. [49]

    Lougovski, E

    P. Lougovski, E. Solano, Z. M. Zhang, H. Walther, H. Mack, and W. P. Schleich, Fresnel Representation of the Wigner Function: An Operational Approach, Physi- cal Review Letters91, 010401 (2003)

    work page 2003

  50. [50]

    D. V. Karlovets and V. G. Serbo, Possibility to Probe Negative Values of a Wigner Function in Scattering of a Coherent Superposition of Electronic Wave Packets by Atoms, Physical Review Letters119, 173601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  51. [51]

    Leibfried, D

    D. Leibfried, D. M. Meekhof, B. E. King, C. Monroe, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland, Experimental Deter- mination of the Motional Quantum State of a Trapped Atom, Physical Review Letters77, 4281 (1996). 16 Appendices for Entropy Production from Spin–Vibrational Coupling in Endohedral-Fullerene Qubits Encapsulated in Suspended Carbon Nanotubes APPENDIX A: ...

    work page 1996