pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15587 · v1 · pith:RENYE4J2new · submitted 2026-05-15 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

Rotationally modulated highly circularly polarised radio pulses from the rapidly rotating M dwarf ASKAP J181335-604720

Shouzhi Wang , Biwei Jiang , Qichen Huang , Shaoteng Huang , Jundan Nie This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 20:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR
keywords M dwarfradio pulsescircular polarizationelectron cyclotron maserstellar magnetosphererotational modulationcoherent emissionsimultaneous observations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Strongly circularly polarized radio pulses from an M dwarf recur at fixed rotational phases and arise as coherent electron cyclotron maser emission in the magnetosphere.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports detection of broadband radio pulses from the M dwarf ASKAP J181335-604720 that show near-100 percent circular polarization and recur at fixed phases of the star's 5.6-hour rotation period. Simultaneous TESS optical data show no flares at the times of the radio pulses. The pulses reach brightness temperatures above 1.8 times 10 to the 12 K, which eliminates incoherent emission processes. The authors therefore conclude that the radiation is produced by coherent electron cyclotron maser action in the stellar magnetosphere, with the observed frequencies requiring local magnetic fields of at least several hundred Gauss. This supplies a clean example of how strictly simultaneous radio and optical observations can separate magnetospheric radio emission from flare-related activity.

Core claim

The radio pulses are confined to narrow intervals in rotational phase, reach circular polarization fractions approaching 100 percent, and exhibit brightness temperatures exceeding 1.8 times 10 to the 12 K. No optical flares are detected in the simultaneous TESS photometry at the pulse epochs. These traits together indicate that the emission is coherent electron cyclotron maser radiation generated within the stellar magnetosphere, implying local field strengths of several hundred Gauss or greater in the emission region.

What carries the argument

Strict rotational phase-locking of the pulses combined with the absence of simultaneous optical flares and a brightness temperature high enough to require a coherent mechanism.

If this is right

  • The magnetosphere contains plasma regions with magnetic fields of several hundred Gauss or stronger at the heights where the 800-1088 MHz emission is generated.
  • Coordinated radio-optical campaigns can isolate magnetospheric coherent emission from flare-associated processes in active M dwarfs.
  • The same emission mechanism can operate without producing detectable optical flares.
  • Rapidly rotating early M dwarfs can sustain stable, phase-locked radio sources tied to their magnetic geometry.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar phase-locked polarized pulses may be found in other rapidly rotating M dwarfs by re-examining wide-field radio survey data with precise rotation periods.
  • The radio emission could contribute to atmospheric erosion or particle acceleration on any close-in planets orbiting such stars.
  • Multi-frequency observations phased to the rotation period could map the radial distribution of magnetic field strength in the magnetosphere.

Load-bearing premise

That the lack of detected optical flares in the TESS data at the radio pulse times rules out any connection to flare-driven coronal activity.

What would settle it

Detection of an optical flare occurring at the same rotational phase and within the same time window as a radio pulse in a future simultaneous observation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.15587 by Biwei Jiang, Jundan Nie, Qichen Huang, Shaoteng Huang, Shouzhi Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: TESS photometric analysis of ASKAP J181335-604720 (TIC 365466012). a, Sector 93 TESS PDCSAP light curve after excluding cadences with non-zero QUALITY flags, shown in four consecutive time intervals for clarity. The flux has been normalized relative to its median value. b, Lomb–Scargle periodogram of the Sector 93 light curve, computed over a total baseline of 24.39 d. A dominant peak is detected at a peri… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Simultaneous ASKAP radio and TESS optical observations of ASKAP J181335-604720. Top panel: The TESS relative optical light curve during the ASKAP observing interval, with the flux normalized to the median value and expressed in fractional units. Middle panel: ASKAP radio light curves in Stokes I (black) and Stokes V (red), binned to 60 s for clarity. Bottom panel: Dynamic spectrum of the ASKAP Stokes V rad… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Phase-folded ASKAP radio light curves from two observing epochs. The ASKAP Stokes I (black) and Stokes V (red) time series are phase-folded using the optical rotation period P = 5.607 h derived from the TESS photometry, with the start time of ASKAP Epoch 1 adopted as the reference phase zero-point. The top and bottom panels show Epoch 1 and Epoch 2, respectively. the local magnetic field strength in the em… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report the detection of strong, highly circularly polarised, and rotationally modulated radio pulses from the early-mid M dwarf ASKAP J181335-604720, based on strictly simultaneous radio and optical observations with the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder (ASKAP) and the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS). The ASKAP data reveal recurrent broadband radio pulses across 800-1088 MHz, with peak circular polarisation fractions approaching 100%. A dominant period of P = 5.607 +- 0.003 h is derived from the TESS light curve using a Lomb-Scargle analysis, which we interpret as the stellar rotation period. When phase-folded on this period, the radio emission is confined to narrow phase intervals and recurs at fixed rotational phases, consisting of a dominant pulse and a weaker secondary component. No contemporaneous optical flares are detected at the epochs of the radio pulses in the simultaneous TESS data. Even under conservative assumptions, the inferred brightness temperature exceeds Tb > 1.8 * 10^12 K, ruling out incoherent emission mechanisms. Combining the observed characteristics, we interpret the emission as coherent electron cyclotron maser (ECM) radiation arising from the stellar magnetosphere, with the observed frequencies implying local magnetic field strengths of at least several hundred Gauss in the radio-emitting region. This work provides a clean, well-constrained, and strictly simultaneous radio-optical case, demonstrating that coordinated radio and optical observations offer a powerful means of distinguishing magnetospheric coherent radio emission from flare-associated coronal activity in M dwarfs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports the detection of strong, highly circularly polarized (approaching 100%) broadband radio pulses from the early-mid M dwarf ASKAP J181335-604720 using strictly simultaneous ASKAP (800-1088 MHz) and TESS observations. A stellar rotation period of P = 5.607 ± 0.003 h is derived via Lomb-Scargle analysis of the TESS light curve; phase-folding shows the radio pulses recur at fixed rotational phases with a dominant pulse and weaker secondary. No optical flares are detected in TESS at the radio pulse epochs. The inferred brightness temperature exceeds Tb > 1.8 × 10^12 K, ruling out incoherent mechanisms, leading to an interpretation as coherent electron cyclotron maser (ECM) emission from the stellar magnetosphere implying local B ≳ several hundred Gauss.

Significance. If the central interpretation holds, this provides a clean, strictly simultaneous radio-optical case study that strengthens the distinction between magnetospheric coherent emission and flare-associated coronal activity in M dwarfs. The combination of near-total circular polarization, high Tb, and clear rotational modulation with fixed-phase recurrence offers direct support for ECM; the simultaneous TESS coverage is a notable strength for constraining flare associations.

major comments (1)
  1. [Interpretation and discussion of simultaneous TESS data] The section interpreting the lack of TESS flares: the claim that non-detection of optical flares at radio pulse epochs rules out flare-driven coronal activity (and supports a purely magnetospheric ECM origin) is load-bearing for the central interpretation. However, without reported upper limits on undetected flare energies, a quantitative assessment of TESS sensitivity/cadence at the exact pulse times, or discussion of possible low-energy or low-contrast events below ~10^30 erg, this exclusion remains an assumption rather than a demonstrated constraint. TESS bandpass limitations on M dwarfs could miss events compatible with the observed radio properties.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Observations and data reduction] Clarify the exact time overlap and simultaneity criteria between ASKAP and TESS datasets in the methods or observations section to support the 'strictly simultaneous' description.
  2. [Results on brightness temperature] The brightness temperature lower limit (Tb > 1.8 × 10^12 K) is stated under conservative assumptions; explicitly list the assumptions (e.g., source size, distance) used in its derivation for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the significance of our results and for the constructive comment on the TESS analysis. We address the major comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the relevant discussion.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The section interpreting the lack of TESS flares: the claim that non-detection of optical flares at radio pulse epochs rules out flare-driven coronal activity (and supports a purely magnetospheric ECM origin) is load-bearing for the central interpretation. However, without reported upper limits on undetected flare energies, a quantitative assessment of TESS sensitivity/cadence at the exact pulse times, or discussion of possible low-energy or low-contrast events below ~10^30 erg, this exclusion remains an assumption rather than a demonstrated constraint. TESS bandpass limitations on M dwarfs could miss events compatible with the observed radio properties.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative treatment of the TESS non-detections would improve the robustness of our interpretation. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph that reports the TESS 2-minute cadence and the achieved photometric precision at the radio-pulse epochs. From these data we derive an upper limit of approximately 3 x 10^29 erg on the energy of any undetected flare in the TESS bandpass. We also briefly discuss bandpass limitations for M-dwarf flares and note that while very low-energy or low-contrast events cannot be entirely excluded, the combination of near-100% circular polarization, Tb > 10^12 K, and strict rotational-phase recurrence remains difficult to reconcile with typical flare-driven coronal emission. The wording in the discussion has been moderated to present the optical non-detection as supportive rather than conclusive evidence. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper derives the stellar rotation period independently from TESS photometry via Lomb-Scargle periodogram and phase-folds the ASKAP radio pulses on this period. Brightness temperature is computed directly from observed flux density, distance, and conservative source-size assumptions to exceed 1.8e12 K, excluding incoherent mechanisms by standard radiative-transfer limits. The ECM magnetospheric interpretation is then assigned by matching the full set of observed traits (near-100% circular polarization, fixed-phase recurrence, broadband spectrum, and lack of simultaneous optical flares) to established properties of stellar ECM emission reported in prior external literature. No parameters are fitted within the paper and then relabeled as predictions of the same quantities; no self-citations supply load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes; and the non-detection of flares functions as an external observational constraint rather than a self-referential definition. The chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions in radio astronomy for identifying ECM emission and on the identification of the photometric period as rotation.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The dominant period derived from Lomb-Scargle analysis of the TESS light curve represents the stellar rotation period.
    This period is used to phase-fold the radio pulses and demonstrate rotational modulation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5835 in / 1182 out tokens · 53917 ms · 2026-05-19T20:04:24.188847+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    V., Branduardi-Raymont, G., Galand, M., et al

    Badman, S. V., Branduardi-Raymont, G., Galand, M., et al. 2015, SSRv, 187, 99, doi: 10.1007/s11214-014-0042-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-014-0042-x 2015

  2. [2]

    S., Cotton, W

    Bastian, T. S., Cotton, W. D., & Hallinan, G. 2022, ApJ, 935, 99, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7d57

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7d57 2022

  3. [3]

    O., & G¨ udel, M

    Benz, A. O., & G¨ udel, M. 2010, ARA&A, 48, 241, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101757

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101757 2010

  4. [4]

    O., & Guedel, M

    Benz, A. O., & Guedel, M. 1994, A&A, 285, 621

    work page 1994

  5. [5]

    Berdyugina, S. V. 2005, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 2, 8, doi: 10.12942/lrsp-2005-8 12W ang et al. Figure A3.G¨ udel–Benz diagram including ASKAP J181335-604720 and other M dwarfs. The red star marks ASKAP J181335-604720, while the blue circles, black squares, and black stars denote literature M dwarfs, activity-driven candidates, and auroral candida...

    work page doi:10.12942/lrsp-2005-8 2005

  6. [6]

    E., Phan-Bao, N., et al

    Berger, E., Rutledge, R. E., Phan-Bao, N., et al. 2009, ApJ, 695, 310, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/695/1/310

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/695/1/310 2009

  7. [7]

    Bhardwaj, A., & Gladstone, G. R. 2000, Reviews of Geophysics, 38, 295, doi: 10.1029/1998RG000046

    work page doi:10.1029/1998rg000046 2000

  8. [8]

    J., Hawley, S

    Bochanski, J. J., Hawley, S. L., Covey, K. R., et al. 2010, AJ, 139, 2679, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2679

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2679 2010

  9. [9]

    R., Vedantham, H

    Callingham, J. R., Vedantham, H. K., Shimwell, T. W., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 1233, doi: 10.1038/s41550-021-01483-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-021-01483-0 2021

  10. [10]

    R., Shimwell, T

    Callingham, J. R., Shimwell, T. W., Vedantham, H. K., et al. 2023, A&A, 670, A124, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245567

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245567 2023

  11. [11]

    2024, ApJ, 974, 267, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad71c5

    Das, B., Chandra, P., & Petit, V. 2024, ApJ, 974, 267, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad71c5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad71c5 2024

  12. [12]

    E., et al

    Das, B., Chandra, P., Shultz, M. E., et al. 2022, ApJ, 925, 125, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2576

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2576 2022

  13. [13]

    Davenport, J. R. A. 2016, ApJ, 829, 23, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/829/1/23

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/829/1/23 2016

  14. [14]

    G., & Wu, K

    Doyle, L., Ramsay, G., Doyle, J. G., & Wu, K. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 437, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2205

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2205 2019

  15. [15]

    Dulk, G. A. 1985, ARA&A, 23, 169, doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.23.090185.001125 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 G¨ udel, M. 2002, ARA&A, 40, 217, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093806

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.23.090185.001125 1985

  16. [16]

    Guedel, M., & Benz, A. O. 1993, ApJL, 405, L63, doi: 10.1086/186766 G¨ unther, M. N., Zhan, Z., Seager, S., et al. 2020, AJ, 159, 60, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab5d3a

    work page doi:10.1086/186766 1993

  17. [17]

    G., et al

    Hallinan, G., Antonova, A., Doyle, J. G., et al. 2006, ApJ, 653, 690, doi: 10.1086/508678 —. 2008, ApJ, 684, 644, doi: 10.1086/590360

    work page doi:10.1086/508678 2006

  18. [18]

    2007, ApJL, 663, L25, doi: 10.1086/519790

    Hallinan, G., Bourke, S., Lane, C., et al. 2007, ApJL, 663, L25, doi: 10.1086/519790

    work page doi:10.1086/519790 2007

  19. [19]

    P., Cotter, G., et al

    Hallinan, G., Littlefair, S. P., Cotter, G., et al. 2015, Nature, 523, 568, doi: 10.1038/nature14619

    work page doi:10.1038/nature14619 2015

  20. [20]

    L., Davenport, J

    Hawley, S. L., Davenport, J. R. A., Kowalski, A. F., et al. 2014, ApJ, 797, 121, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/121

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/797/2/121 2014

  21. [21]

    L., & Pettersen, B

    Hawley, S. L., & Pettersen, B. R. 1991, ApJ, 378, 725, doi: 10.1086/170474

    work page doi:10.1086/170474 1991

  22. [22]

    L., Allred, J

    Hawley, S. L., Allred, J. C., Johns-Krull, C. M., et al. 2003, ApJ, 597, 535, doi: 10.1086/378351

    work page doi:10.1086/378351 2003

  23. [23]

    J., & Jao, W.-C

    Henry, T. J., & Jao, W.-C. 2024, ARA&A, 62, 593, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-052722-102740

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-052722-102740 2024

  24. [24]

    I., & Pauliny-Toth, I

    Kellermann, K. I., & Pauliny-Toth, I. I. K. 1969, ApJL, 155, L71, doi: 10.1086/180305

    work page doi:10.1086/180305 1969

  25. [25]

    2022, A&A, 657, A7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142146

    Kervella, P., Arenou, F., & Th´ evenin, F. 2022, A&A, 657, A7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142146

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142146 2022

  26. [26]

    , keywords =

    Kochukhov, O. 2021, A&A Rv, 29, 1, doi: 10.1007/s00159-020-00130-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-020-00130-3 2021

  27. [27]

    Lomb, N. R. 1976, Ap&SS, 39, 447, doi: 10.1007/BF00648343 Radio Pulses from the M Dwarf13

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00648343 1976

  28. [28]

    2025, ApJL, 990, L32, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adfc5b

    Lu, H.-P., Zhang, J.-L., Tian, H., et al. 2025, ApJL, 990, L32, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adfc5b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adfc5b 2025

  29. [29]

    Anderson, G. E. 2017, ApJL, 836, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa5ffd

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa5ffd 2017

  30. [30]

    2014, ApJS, 211, 24, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/211/2/24

    McQuillan, A., Mazeh, T., & Aigrain, S. 2014, ApJS, 211, 24, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/211/2/24

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/211/2/24 2014

  31. [31]

    B., & Dulk, G

    Melrose, D. B., & Dulk, G. A. 1982, ApJ, 259, 844, doi: 10.1086/160219

    work page doi:10.1086/160219 1982

  32. [32]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    Merloni, A., Lamer, G., Liu, T., et al. 2024, A&A, 682, A34, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347165

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347165 2024

  33. [33]

    R., Irwin, J., Charbonneau, D., et al

    Newton, E. R., Irwin, J., Charbonneau, D., et al. 2017, ApJ, 834, 85, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/85

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/85 2017

  34. [34]

    D., Burleigh, M

    Nichols, J. D., Burleigh, M. R., Casewell, S. L., et al. 2012, ApJ, 760, 59, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/760/1/59

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/760/1/59 2012

  35. [35]

    P., Marvil, J., Collier, J

    Norris, R. P., Marvil, J., Collier, J. D., et al. 2021, PASA, 38, e046, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2021.42

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2021.42 2021

  36. [36]

    R., McKinley, B., Hurley-Walker, N., et al

    Offringa, A. R., McKinley, B., Hurley-Walker, N., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 606, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1368

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1368 2014

  37. [37]

    A., Hawley, S

    Osten, R. A., Hawley, S. L., Allred, J. C., Johns-Krull, C. M., & Roark, C. 2005, ApJ, 621, 398, doi: 10.1086/427275 P´ erez-Torres, M., G´ omez, J. F., Ortiz, J. L., et al. 2021, A&A, 645, A77, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039052

    work page doi:10.1086/427275 2005

  38. [38]

    S., Hallinan, G., & Kao, M

    Pineda, J. S., Hallinan, G., & Kao, M. M. 2017, ApJ, 846, 75, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8596

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8596 2017

  39. [39]

    Pope, B. J. S., Callingham, J. R., Feinstein, A. D., et al. 2021, ApJL, 919, L10, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac230c

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac230c 2021

  40. [40]

    2021, MNRAS, 502, 5438, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab299

    Pritchard, J., Murphy, T., Zic, A., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 502, 5438, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab299

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab299 2021

  41. [41]

    S., Reyl´ e, C., Allard, F., et al

    Rajpurohit, A. S., Reyl´ e, C., Allard, F., et al. 2013, A&A, 556, A15, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321346

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321346 2013

  42. [42]

    2007, ApJ, 656, 1121, doi: 10.1086/510304

    Reiners, A., & Basri, G. 2007, ApJ, 656, 1121, doi: 10.1086/510304

    work page doi:10.1086/510304 2007

  43. [43]

    R., Winn, J

    Ricker, G. R., Winn, J. N., Vanderspek, R., et al. 2015, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 1, 014003, doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1117/1.jatis.1.1.014003 2015

  44. [44]

    2023, ApJL, 951, L43, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace188

    Rose, K., Pritchard, J., Murphy, T., et al. 2023, ApJL, 951, L43, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace188

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ace188 2023

  45. [45]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , author =

    Salvato, M., Wolf, J., Dwelly, T., et al. 2025, A&A, 704, A344, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556142

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556142 2025

  46. [46]

    Savitzky, A., & Golay, M. J. E. 1964, Analytical Chemistry, 36, 1627, doi: 10.1021/ac60214a047

    work page doi:10.1021/ac60214a047 1964

  47. [47]

    Scargle, J. D. 1982, ApJ, 263, 835, doi: 10.1086/160554

    work page doi:10.1086/160554 1982

  48. [48]

    2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0184, doi: 10.1038/s41550-017-0184

    Shulyak, D., Reiners, A., Engeln, A., et al. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0184, doi: 10.1038/s41550-017-0184

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-017-0184 2017

  49. [49]

    2019, A&A, 626, A86, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935315

    Shulyak, D., Reiners, A., Nagel, E., et al. 2019, A&A, 626, A86, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935315

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935315 2019

  50. [50]

    Strassmeier, K. G. 2009, A&A Rv, 17, 251, doi: 10.1007/s00159-009-0020-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-009-0020-6 2009

  51. [51]

    J., et al

    Tasse, C., Zarka, P., Hardcastle, M. J., et al. 2026, Nature Astronomy, 10, 410, doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02757-7 TESS Team. 2021, TESS Light Curves - All Sectors, STScI/MAST, doi: 10.17909/T9-NMC8-F686

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02757-7 2026

  52. [52]

    2019, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 16, 3, doi: 10.1007/s41116-019-0019-7

    Toriumi, S., & Wang, H. 2019, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 16, 3, doi: 10.1007/s41116-019-0019-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s41116-019-0019-7 2019

  53. [53]

    Treumann, R. A. 2006, A&A Rv, 13, 229, doi: 10.1007/s00159-006-0001-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-006-0001-y 2006

  54. [54]

    Coherent radio emission from the magnetic chemically peculiar star CU Virginis

    Trigilio, C., Leto, P., Leone, F., Umana, G., & Buemi, C. 2000, A&A, 362, 281, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0007097

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0007097 2000

  55. [55]

    K., Callingham, J

    Vedantham, H. K., Callingham, J. R., Shimwell, T. W., et al. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 577, doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-1011-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-020-1011-9 2020

  56. [56]

    2019, ApJ, 871, 214, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf88e

    Villadsen, J., & Hallinan, G. 2019, ApJ, 871, 214, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf88e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf88e 2019

  57. [57]

    Williams, P. K. G., Casewell, S. L., Stark, C. R., et al. 2015, ApJ, 815, 64, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/815/1/64

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/815/1/64 2015

  58. [58]

    Zarka, P. 1998, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 20159, doi: 10.1029/98JE01323 —. 2007, Planet. Space Sci., 55, 598, doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2006.05.045

    work page doi:10.1029/98je01323 1998

  59. [59]

    2019, MNRAS, 488, 559, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1684

    Zic, A., Stewart, A., Lenc, E., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 559, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1684

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1684 2019