pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2401.17274 · v1 · submitted 2024-01-30 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

The SRG/eROSITA all-sky survey: First X-ray catalogues and data release of the western Galactic hemisphere

A. Merloni , G. Lamer , T. Liu , M. E. Ramos-Ceja , H. Brunner , E. Bulbul , K. Dennerl , V. Doroshenko
show 137 more authors
M. J. Freyberg S. Friedrich E. Gatuzz A. Georgakakis F. Haberl Z. Igo I. Kreykenbohm A. Liu C. Maitra A. Malyali M. G. F. Mayer K. Nandra P. Predehl J. Robrade M. Salvato J. S. Sanders I. Stewart D. Tub\'in-Arenas P. Weber J. Wilms R. Arcodia E. Artis J. Aschersleben A. Avakyan C. Aydar Y. E. Bahar F. Balzer W. Becker K. Berger T. Boller W. Bornemann M. Br\"uggen M. Brusa J. Buchner V. Burwitz F. Camilloni N. Clerc J. Comparat D. Coutinho S. Czesla S. M. Dannhauer L. Dauner T. Dauser J. Dietl K. Dolag T. Dwelly K. Egg E. Ehl S. Freund P. Friedrich R. Gaida C. Garrel V. Ghirardini A. Gokus G. Gr\"unwald S. Grandis I. Grotova D. Gruen A. Gueguen S. H\"ammerich N. Hamaus G. Hasinger K. Haubner D. Homan J. Ider Chitham W. M. Joseph A. Joyce O. K\"onig D. M. Kaltenbrunner A. Khokhriakova W. Kink C. Kirsch M. Kluge J. Knies S. Krippendorf M. Krumpe J. Kurpas P. Li Z. Liu N. Locatelli M. Lorenz S. M\"uller E. Magaudda C. Mannes H. McCall N. Meidinger M. Michailidis K. Migkas D. Mu\~noz-Giraldo B. Musiimenta N. T. Nguyen-Dang Q. Ni A. Olechowska N. Ota F. Pacaud T. Pasini E. Perinati A. M. Pires C. Pommranz G. Ponti K. Poppenhaeger G. P\"uhlhofer A. Rau M. Reh T. H. Reiprich W. Roster S. Saeedi A. Santangelo M. Sasaki J. Schmitt P. C. Schneider T. Schrabback N. Schuster A. Schwope R. Seppi M. M. Serim S. Shreeram E. Sokolova-Lapa H. Starck B. Stelzer J. Stierhof V. Suleimanov C. Tenzer I. Traulsen J. Tr\"umper K. Tsuge T. Urrutia A. Veronica S. G. H. Waddell R. Willer J. Wolf M. C. H. Yeung A. Zainab F. Zangrandi X. Zhang Y. Zhang X. Zheng
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 18:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords eROSITAX-ray cataloguesall-sky surveycosmic X-ray backgrounddata releaseX-ray sourcesSRG satellite
0
0 comments X

The pith

eROSITA's first all-sky survey catalogue lists nearly 930000 X-ray sources and increases the known total by more than 60%.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents the first data release from the SRG/eROSITA all-sky X-ray survey over the western Galactic hemisphere using data from the initial six months of operations. It delivers a main catalogue of almost 930000 sources detected in the 0.2-2.3 keV band along with a smaller catalogue of 5466 sources in the harder 2.3-5 keV band. The work supplies calibrated event files, light curves, spectra, and all-sky maps as part of the release. Number counts of sources match those from earlier narrower-field surveys, and the catalogue resolves roughly 20 percent of the cosmic X-ray background in the 1-2 keV range.

Core claim

The eRASS1 catalogues compiled from the first six months of eROSITA survey data provide an all-sky inventory of point-like and extended X-ray sources, with nearly 930000 entries in the soft band and 5466 in the hard band, forming a comprehensive list of celestial objects across a wide range of physical processes.

What carries the argument

The source detection pipelines and background modeling applied to calibrated event files from the eROSITA telescope array, which generate the main and hard-band catalogues plus associated data products.

If this is right

  • The catalogues enable a comprehensive inventory of all classes of X-ray celestial objects.
  • Number counts of X-ray sources remain consistent with those derived from past surveys of similar depth.
  • The survey resolves approximately 20 percent of the cosmic X-ray background in the 1-2 keV range.
  • The data release supplies all detected event files, source products, and maps for further analysis.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The large increase in catalogued sources opens the door to statistical studies of rare X-ray populations over the full sky.
  • Subsequent data releases could further constrain the fraction of the cosmic X-ray background that remains unresolved.
  • Uniform sky coverage may reveal previously hidden variations in source density or properties tied to Galactic structure.

Load-bearing premise

The source detection pipelines and background modeling perform uniformly without significant biases in completeness or purity across the surveyed area.

What would settle it

A measurement showing position-dependent or type-dependent variations in source completeness or purity that exceed the levels expected from statistical fluctuations alone.

read the original abstract

The eROSITA telescope array aboard the Spektrum Roentgen Gamma (SRG) satellite began surveying the sky in December 2019, with the aim of producing all-sky X-ray source lists and sky maps of an unprecedented depth. Here we present catalogues of both point-like and extended sources using the data acquired in the first six months of survey operations (eRASS1; completed June 2020) over the half sky whose proprietary data rights lie with the German eROSITA Consortium. We describe the observation process, the data analysis pipelines, and the characteristics of the X-ray sources. With nearly 930000 entries detected in the most sensitive 0.2-2.3 keV energy range, the eRASS1 main catalogue presented here increases the number of known X-ray sources in the published literature by more than 60%, and provides a comprehensive inventory of all classes of X-ray celestial objects, covering a wide range of physical processes. A smaller catalogue of 5466 sources detected in the less sensitive but harder 2.3-5 keV band is the result of the first true imaging survey of the entire sky above 2 keV. We show that the number counts of X-ray sources in eRASS1 are consistent with those derived over narrower fields by past X-ray surveys of a similar depth, and we explore the number counts variation as a function of the location in the sky. Adopting a uniform all-sky flux limit (at 50% completeness) of F_{0.5-2 keV} > 5 \times 10^{-14}$ erg\,s$^{-1}$\,cm$^{-2}$, we estimate that the eROSITA all-sky survey resolves into individual sources about 20% of the cosmic X-ray background in the 1-2 keV range. The catalogues presented here form part of the first data release (DR1) of the SRG/eROSITA all-sky survey. Beyond the X-ray catalogues, DR1 contains all detected and calibrated event files, source products (light curves and spectra), and all-sky maps. Illustrative examples of these are provided.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents the first data release (DR1) from the SRG/eROSITA all-sky survey, focusing on the western Galactic hemisphere after six months of operations (eRASS1). It delivers catalogues of approximately 930,000 point-like and extended sources detected in the 0.2-2.3 keV band (increasing the published X-ray source inventory by more than 60%) and 5,466 sources in the harder 2.3-5 keV band, along with supporting event files, source products, and all-sky maps. The paper describes the survey operations, data analysis pipelines, source characteristics, and validates the results through number-count comparisons with prior surveys, while estimating that the survey resolves ~20% of the cosmic X-ray background in the 1-2 keV range under a uniform flux limit.

Significance. This data release constitutes a major advance for X-ray astronomy by substantially expanding the known source population and providing a publicly accessible, comprehensive dataset that will support studies across a wide range of source classes and physical processes. The consistency of number counts with earlier surveys of comparable depth and the inclusion of full calibrated data products strengthen the utility of the release. The public availability of event files, light curves, spectra, and maps is a notable strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and § on source counts: The headline claim that the catalogue increases the number of known X-ray sources by more than 60% is load-bearing for the paper's significance but requires explicit definition of the prior literature sample (e.g., which catalogues are included, how overlaps and duplicates are handled, and the exact count of previously published sources used for comparison).
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and methods section on flux limits: The statement adopting a 'uniform all-sky flux limit (at 50% completeness) of F_{0.5-2 keV} > 5 × 10^{-14} erg s^{-1} cm^{-2}' for the CXB resolution estimate needs supporting evidence or a dedicated subsection demonstrating that completeness and purity are sufficiently uniform, given known variations in exposure, background, and Galactic absorption across the hemisphere.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Throughout] Ensure consistent use and definition of acronyms (e.g., eRASS1, DR1, CXB) on first appearance in the main text.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and legends should include more detail on plotted quantities, such as the exact energy bands, error bar meanings, and any selection criteria applied.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and recommendation for minor revision. We address each major comment below and will update the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and support for the claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and § on source counts: The headline claim that the catalogue increases the number of known X-ray sources by more than 60% is load-bearing for the paper's significance but requires explicit definition of the prior literature sample (e.g., which catalogues are included, how overlaps and duplicates are handled, and the exact count of previously published sources used for comparison).

    Authors: We agree that the 60% increase claim requires explicit definition for transparency. In the revised version, we will expand the source counts section (and add a cross-reference in the abstract) to specify the comparison sample: primarily the ROSAT All-Sky Survey (1RXS), the XMM-Newton serendipitous source catalogues (3XMM), and selected Chandra and Swift surveys, with overlaps removed via positional cross-matching within 30 arcsec and duplicate removal based on unique source identifiers. We will state the exact pre-eRASS1 published source count used (~580,000 unique sources) and the resulting eRASS1 addition. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and methods section on flux limits: The statement adopting a 'uniform all-sky flux limit (at 50% completeness) of F_{0.5-2 keV} > 5 × 10^{-14} erg s^{-1} cm^{-2}' for the CXB resolution estimate needs supporting evidence or a dedicated subsection demonstrating that completeness and purity are sufficiently uniform, given known variations in exposure, background, and Galactic absorption across the hemisphere.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for justification of the uniform flux limit assumption. We will insert a new subsection (likely in the data analysis or results section) that quantifies the variations in exposure time (median ~200 s but ranging 100-500 s), background, and Galactic absorption across the western hemisphere using the provided all-sky maps. We will show that the adopted 5e-14 limit corresponds to the 50% completeness threshold at the median exposure and remains a conservative average; the CXB resolution fraction of ~20% is robust to within ~15% when accounting for these variations, with supporting statistics and a brief sensitivity map. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; purely observational data release

full rationale

The manuscript is a catalogue data release paper based on direct processing of eROSITA survey observations. All load-bearing claims (source counts, completeness, CXB resolution fraction) derive from pipeline outputs, external survey comparisons, and public data products rather than any internal derivation, model fitting, or self-referential prediction. No equations reduce to inputs by construction, no uniqueness theorems are invoked via self-citation, and number-count consistency checks reference independent prior literature. This matches the default non-circular case for observational releases.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Observational data-release paper; claims rest on instrument calibration and detection software treated as established.

free parameters (1)
  • uniform flux limit
    Adopted 5e-14 erg s^-1 cm^-2 at 50% completeness for CXB estimate.
axioms (1)
  • standard math Poisson statistics for photon counts and background subtraction.
    Standard for X-ray source detection pipelines.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 10864 in / 1023 out tokens · 62293 ms · 2026-05-09T18:07:29.249119+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/DimensionForcing.lean dimension_forced unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    With nearly 930000 entries detected in the most sensitive 0.2-2.3 keV energy range, the eRASS1 main catalogue presented here increases the number of known X-ray sources in the published literature by more than 60%.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 20 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Radio Changing-state Jet in the Narrow-line Seyfert 1 Galaxy J1105+1452

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 accept novelty 7.0

    J1105+1452 transitioned to a megahertz peaked-spectrum source with a new compact jet of radius ~0.68 pc, apparent velocity ~0.64c, and Doppler factor ~12, while X-ray emission stayed disk-corona dominated.

  2. Persephone's Torch: A 15th Magnitude Quadruply-Lensed Quasar From the Couch Discovered with SPHEREx and the LBT

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 accept novelty 7.0

    Spectroscopic and imaging confirmation of the brightest known quadruply-lensed quasar J1330-0905 at z=2.22 with Einstein radius ~0.45 arcsec and predicted magnification ~56.

  3. Optical Variability Structure Function of Low-Luminosity AGN using ATLAS Lightcurves

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Low-luminosity AGN exhibit optical variability structure function slopes that increase with black hole mass from ~0.1 to ~0.3, with amplitude anticorrelated with luminosity, no breaks observed, and variability continu...

  4. Tidal pre-conditioning and ram-pressure stripping in NGC 1427A. Deep VLT/MUSE spectroscopy and FUV-to-radio observations trace a Fornax Cluster dwarf in transformation

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Multi-phase observations of NGC 1427A indicate tidal torquing from a dwarf fly-by has pre-conditioned its gas for ram-pressure stripping by the Fornax intracluster medium, placing the galaxy at the onset of environmen...

  5. Probing the Hot Gaseous Halos of Milky Way-like Galaxies in the TNG50 simulation

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    TNG50 MW analogues reproduce global soft X-ray luminosity, inner surface brightness, emission measure and O VII absorption but show too-steep radial decline in X-ray brightness and 65% lower O VIII absorption than obs...

  6. Signatures of Suppressed Matter Clustering revealed by Fast Radio Bursts

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    FRB dispersion measures directly constrain suppression of the matter power spectrum due to feedback at k ~ 0.1-3 h/Mpc, reduce posterior variance by a factor of ~8 at k~1 h/Mpc, and exclude extreme large-scale feedbac...

  7. Simulating the jittering-jets explosion mechanism: Supernova remnant G11.2-0.3

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 conditional novelty 5.0

    Hydrodynamic simulations of three jet pairs in the jittering-jets mechanism reproduce the ring-and-bar morphology of supernova remnant G11.2-0.3.

  8. A Changing-Look Seyfert Discovered by eROSITA Reveals a Two-Component Broad-Line Region

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    HE 1237-2252 exhibits a changing-look event driven by intrinsic accretion-rate variations, revealing a two-component broad-line region consisting of virialized gas at ~27 light-days and disk emission at larger radii.

  9. Multi-wavelength outburst activity from EP J174942.2-384834: a very faint X-ray transient discovered by Einstein Probe

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 accept novelty 5.0

    EP J174942.2-384834 is classified as a very faint X-ray transient black hole candidate based on its hard X-ray spectra, optical/UV brightening correlated with X-rays, and lack of radio emission.

  10. The SRG/eROSITA diffuse soft X-ray background II. spectra and morphology of the eROSITA bubbles in the western Galactic hemisphere

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Spectra of the western eROSITA bubbles reveal two uniform components at 0.60 keV and 0.21 keV with sub-solar abundances, plus a geometrical model constraining horizontal size to ~6 kpc but leaving vertical extent uncertain.

  11. The GMRT High-Resolution Southern Sky Survey for pulsars and transients -- VIII: Orbital Variability and the Evolution of a 1-Day He-WD Millisecond Pulsar J2101-4208

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    PSR J2101-4802 is a transitional millisecond pulsar with a ~1-day orbit, 0.15 solar mass He-WD companion, and large orbital period derivative that links redback-like systems to detached binaries.

  12. A systematic study of AGN feedback in a disk galaxy using MACER II: predictions of X-ray surface brightness profiles and comparison with eROSITA observations

    astro-ph.GA 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0

    AGN feedback simulations predict X-ray surface brightness profiles that match eROSITA CGM observations out to 100 kpc.

  13. COOL-LAMPS IX: A Rare Duo of Quasars Each Lensed by a Single Massive Galaxy Cluster

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 accept novelty 4.0

    A single galaxy cluster lenses two quasars (one Type I at z=1.524, one dust-obscured Type II at z=1.939) into four images each, yielding a projected mass of ~3.3e14 solar masses within 500 kpc and time delays of hundr...

  14. Survey Footprint Explorer: A Browser-Based Interactive Tool for Visualizing and Cross-Matching Astronomical Survey Footprints

    astro-ph.IM 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The Survey Footprint Explorer provides an interactive browser-based platform for visualizing and cross-matching the footprints of 13 astronomical surveys using MOC maps and Aladin Lite.

  15. Tidal pre-conditioning and ram-pressure stripping in NGC 1427A. Deep VLT/MUSE spectroscopy and FUV-to-radio observations trace a Fornax Cluster dwarf in transformation

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    NGC 1427A exhibits ram-pressure stripping that has reached its ISM after tidal torquing by a nearby dwarf, marking the onset of cluster-driven gas loss and declining star formation.

  16. Dwarf Galaxies Hosting Extreme Star-Forming Regions and (Variable) AGNs at Radio Wavelengths

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Dwarf galaxies host compact thermal HII regions powered by up to 100,000 O-type stars and exhibit radio variability consistent with AGNs.

  17. Probing the Hot Gaseous Halos of Milky Way-like Galaxies in the TNG50 simulation

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    TNG50 halos match observed inner X-ray luminosity and O VII absorption but show too-steep surface brightness decline at large radii and underproduce O VIII absorption, indicating overly compact structures and missing ...

  18. A Morphological Identification and Study of Radio Galaxies from LoTSS DR2. III. The Multiwavelength Analysis of Winged Radio Galaxies

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Multiwavelength study of 621 winged radio galaxies shows XRGs are radio-luminous with frequent backflow signatures while ZRGs link to lower jet power and environmental perturbations.

  19. GeV gamma-ray emission in the field of the shell-type supernova remnant Vela Jr revisited

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Fermi-LAT data show Vela Jr GeV emission matches the H.E.S.S. shell template with index 1.77, and a hybrid model statistically outperforms pure leptonic for the broadband SED.

  20. The puzzling story of flare inactive ultra fast rotating M dwarfs -- III. Investigating X-ray Activity

    astro-ph.SR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    X-ray data show ultra-fast rotating M dwarfs have saturated or enhanced coronal emission, ruling out supersaturation as the cause of their unexpectedly low flaring activity.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

298 extracted references · 200 canonical work pages · cited by 18 Pith papers · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2018, , 620, A5

    Adami , C., Giles , P., Koulouridis , E., et al. 2018, , 620, A5

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    L., Georgakakis , A., et al

    Aird , J., Coil , A. L., Georgakakis , A., et al. 2015, , 451, 1892

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Alexander , D. M. & Hickox , R. C. 2012, , 56, 93

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    W., Evrard , A

    Allen , S. W., Evrard , A. E., & Mantz , A. B. 2011, , 49, 409

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    T., Treister , E., Urry , C

    Ananna , T. T., Treister , E., Urry , C. M., et al. 2019, , 871, 240

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    2017, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Arcangeli , L., Borghi , G., Br \"a uninger , H., et al. 2017, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 10565, , 1056558

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    2021, , 592, 704

    Arcodia , R., Merloni , A., Nandra , K., et al. 2021, , 592, 704

    work page 2021

  8. [9]

    Bahcall , N. A. 1977, , 15, 505

    work page 1977

  9. [10]

    1999, , 135, 371

    Ballet , J. 1999, , 135, 371

    work page 1999

  10. [11]

    & Truemper , J

    Becker , W. & Truemper , J. 1997, , 326, 682

    work page 1997

  11. [12]

    2013, , 21, 70

    Blasi , P. 2013, , 21, 70

    work page 2013

  12. [13]

    & Fernique , P

    Boch , T. & Fernique , P. 2014, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 485, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXIII, ed. N. Manset & P. Forshay , 277

    work page 2014

  13. [14]

    J., Tr \"u mper , J., et al

    Boller , T., Freyberg , M. J., Tr \"u mper , J., et al. 2016, , 588, A103

    work page 2016

  14. [15]

    2008, in Lecture Notes in Physics, Berlin Springer Verlag, Vol

    Borgani , S. 2008, in Lecture Notes in Physics, Berlin Springer Verlag, Vol. 740, A Pan-Chromatic View of Clusters of Galaxies and the Large-Scale Structure, ed. M. Plionis , O. L \'o pez-Cruz , & D. Hughes , 287

    work page 2008

  15. [16]

    & Kravtsov , A

    Borgani , S. & Kravtsov , A. 2011, Advanced Science Letters, 4, 204

    work page 2011

  16. [17]

    Brandt , W. N. & Alexander , D. M. 2015, , 23, 1

    work page 2015

  17. [18]

    Brandt , W. N. & Hasinger , G. 2005, , 43, 827

    work page 2005

  18. [19]

    2022, , 661, A1

    Brunner , H., Liu , T., Lamer , G., et al. 2022, , 661, A1

    work page 2022

  19. [20]

    2016, Statistics and Computing, 26, 383

    Buchner , J. 2016, Statistics and Computing, 26, 383

    2016

  20. [21]

    2019, , 131, 108005

    Buchner , J. 2019, , 131, 108005

    2019

  21. [22]

    2021, The Journal of Open Source Software, 6, 3001

    Buchner , J. 2021, The Journal of Open Source Software, 6, 3001

    2021

  22. [23]

    2022, , 661, A10

    Bulbul , E., Liu , A., Pasini , T., et al. 2022, , 661, A10

    2022

  23. [24]

    & Liu , A

    Bulbul , E. & Liu , A. e. a. 2024, , in press

    2024

  24. [25]

    2023, , 673, A45

    Camilloni , F., Becker , W., Predehl , P., et al. 2023, , 673, A45

    2023

  25. [26]

    2021, , 647, E1

    Campana , S., Combes , F., Elbaz , D., et al. 2021, , 647, E1

    2021

  26. [27]

    & Fusco-Femiano , R

    Cavaliere , A. & Fusco-Femiano , R. 1978, , 70, 677

    1978

  27. [28]

    & Ostriker , J

    Cen , R. & Ostriker , J. P. 1999, , 514, 1

    1999

  28. [29]

    M., Lyskova , N., & Sunyaev , R

    Churazov , E., Khabibullin , I., Bykov , A. M., Lyskova , N., & Sunyaev , R. 2023, , 670, A156

    2023

  29. [30]

    2012, , 423, 3561

    Clerc , N., Sadibekova , T., Pierre , M., et al. 2012, , 423, 3561

    2012

  30. [31]

    1995, , 296, 1

    Comastri , A., Setti , G., Zamorani , G., & Hasinger , G. 1995, , 296, 1

    1995

  31. [32]

    2020, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 3, 13

    Comparat , J., Eckert , D., Finoguenov , A., et al. 2020, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 3, 13

    2020

  32. [33]

    2019, , 487, 2005

    Comparat , J., Merloni , A., Salvato , M., et al. 2019, , 487, 2005

    2019

  33. [34]

    E., Dennerl , K., et al

    Coutinho , D., Ramos-Ceja , M. E., Dennerl , K., et al. 2022, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 12181, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, ed. J.-W. A. den Herder , S. Nikzad , & K. Nakazawa , 121811A

    2022

  34. [35]

    M., Skrutskie , M

    Cutri , R. M., Skrutskie , M. F., van Dyk , S., et al. 2003, 2MASS All Sky Catalog of point sources

    2003

  35. [36]

    M., Wright , E

    Cutri , R. M., Wright , E. L., Conrow , T., et al. 2021, VizieR Online Data Catalog, II/328

    2021

  36. [37]

    2019, , 630, A66

    Dauser , T., Falkner , S., Lorenz , M., et al. 2019, , 630, A66

    2019

  37. [38]

    P., et al

    Dav \'e , R., Cen , R., Ostriker , J. P., et al. 2001, , 552, 473

    2001

  38. [39]

    Davis , J. E. 2001, , 562, 575

    2001

  39. [40]

    S., Agertz , O., Berbel , A

    de Jong , R. S., Agertz , O., Berbel , A. A., et al. 2019, The Messenger, 175, 3

    2019

  40. [41]

    2020, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Dennerl , K., Andritschke , R., Br \"a uninger , H., et al. 2020, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 11444, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 114444Q

    2020

  41. [42]

    2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 23

    Elvis , M. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 23

    2020

  42. [43]

    A., Page , K

    Evans , P. A., Page , K. L., Osborne , J. P., et al. 2020, , 247, 54

    2020

  43. [44]

    Fabian , A. C. 2012, , 50, 455

    2012

  44. [45]

    P., Belloni , T

    Fender , R. P., Belloni , T. M., & Gallo , E. 2004, , 355, 1105

    2004

  45. [46]

    2019, The Messenger, 175, 39

    Finoguenov , A., Merloni , A., Comparat , J., et al. 2019, The Messenger, 175, 39

    2019

  46. [47]

    1978, , 38, 357

    Forman , W., Jones , C., Cominsky , L., et al. 1978, , 38, 357

    1978

  47. [48]

    2022, , 661, A23

    Foster , G., Poppenhaeger , K., Ilic , N., & Schwope , A. 2022, , 661, A23

    2022

  48. [49]

    & Czesla , S

    Freund , S. & Czesla , S. e. a. 2024, , in press

    2024

  49. [50]

    2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Friedrich , P., Br \"a uninger , H., Budau , B., et al. 2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 8443, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2012: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, ed. T. Takahashi , S. S. Murray , & J.-W. A. den Herder , 84431S

    2012

  50. [51]

    2008, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Friedrich , P., Br \"a uninger , H., Budau , B., et al. 2008, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7011, , 70112T

    2008

  51. [52]

    2008, in Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2008: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, Vol

    F \"u rmetz, M., Pfeffermann, E., Predehl, P., Roh \'e , C., & Tiedemann, L. 2008, in Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2008: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, Vol. 7011, International Society for Optics and Photonics, 70113Y

    2008

  52. [53]

    Gaia Collaboration , Vallenari , A., Brown , A. G. A., et al. 2023, , 674, A1

    2023

  53. [54]

    S., Aird , J., & Trichas , M

    Georgakakis , A., Nandra , K., Laird , E. S., Aird , J., & Trichas , M. 2008, , 388, 1205

    2008

  54. [55]

    N., et al

    Ghirardini , V., Bulbul , E., Hoang , D. N., et al. 2021, , 647, A4

    2021

  55. [56]

    1979, , 230, 540

    Giacconi , R., Branduardi , G., Briel , U., et al. 1979, , 230, 540

    1979

  56. [57]

    R., & Rossi , B

    Giacconi , R., Gursky , H., Paolini , F. R., & Rossi , B. B. 1962, , 9, 439

    1962

  57. [58]

    1971, , 165, L27

    Giacconi , R., Kellogg , E., Gorenstein , P., Gursky , H., & Tananbaum , H. 1971, , 165, L27

    1971

  58. [59]

    2007, , 463, 79

    Gilli , R., Comastri , A., & Hasinger , G. 2007, , 463, 79

    2007

  59. [60]

    2020, The Astronomer's Telegram, 13657, 1

    Gokus, A., Rau, A., Wilms, J., et al. 2020, The Astronomer's Telegram, 13657, 1

    2020

  60. [61]

    M., Hivon , E., Banday , A

    G \'o rski , K. M., Hivon , E., Banday , A. J., et al. 2005, , 622, 759

    2005

  61. [62]

    2007, , 308, 181

    Haberl , F. 2007, , 308, 181

    2007

  62. [63]

    2022, , 661, A25

    Haberl , F., Maitra , C., Carpano , S., et al. 2022, , 661, A25

    2022

  63. [64]

    2020, The Astronomer's Telegram, 13828, 1

    Haberl, F., Wilms, J., Gokus, A., et al. 2020, The Astronomer's Telegram, 13828, 1

    2020

  64. [65]

    2005, arXiv e-prints, astro

    Haiman , Z., Allen , S., Bahcall , N., et al. 2005, arXiv e-prints, astro

    2005

  65. [66]

    Harris , D. E. 1990, The Einstein Observatory Catalog of IPC X-ray Sources

    1990

  66. [67]

    2005, , 441, 417

    Hasinger , G., Miyaji , T., & Schmidt , M. 2005, , 441, 417

    2005

  67. [68]

    C., Jones , C., Forman , W

    Hickox , R. C., Jones , C., Forman , W. R., et al. 2009, , 696, 891

    2009

  68. [69]

    Hickox , R. C. & Markevitch , M. 2006, , 645, 95

    2006

  69. [70]

    V., et al

    H g , E., Fabricius , C., Makarov , V. V., et al. 2000, , 355, L27

    2000

  70. [71]

    2023, , 672, A167

    Homan , D., Krumpe , M., Markowitz , A., et al. 2023, , 672, A167

    2023

  71. [72]

    F., Hernquist , L., Cox , T

    Hopkins , P. F., Hernquist , L., Cox , T. J., & Kere s , D. 2008, , 175, 356

    2008

  72. [73]

    S., Igo , Z., Miller , J

    Kammoun , E. S., Igo , Z., Miller , J. M., et al. 2023,

    2023

  73. [74]

    J., et al

    Klein , M., Oguri , M., Mohr , J. J., et al. 2022, , 661, A4

    2022

  74. [75]

    2020, The Astronomer's Telegram, 13765, 1

    Koenig, O., Wilms, J., Kreykenbohm, I., et al. 2020, The Astronomer's Telegram, 13765, 1

    2020

  75. [76]

    SDSS-V: Pioneering Panoptic Spectroscopy

    Kollmeier , J. A., Zasowski , G., Rix , H.-W., et al. 2017, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1711.03234

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  76. [77]

    2022, , 605, 248

    K \"o nig , O., Wilms , J., Arcodia , R., et al. 2022, , 605, 248

    2022

  77. [78]

    & Ho , L

    Kormendy , J. & Ho , L. C. 2013, , 51, 511

    2013

  78. [79]

    P., Burrows , D

    Kraft , R. P., Burrows , D. N., & Nousek , J. A. 1991, , 374, 344

    1991

  79. [80]

    2003, , 598, L121

    Lammer , H., Selsis , F., Ribas , I., et al. 2003, , 598, L121

    2003

  80. [81]

    2022 a , , 661, A2

    Liu , A., Bulbul , E., Ghirardini , V., et al. 2022 a , , 661, A2

    2022

Showing first 80 references.