pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15974 · v1 · pith:FRQ2ROBSnew · submitted 2026-05-15 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mes-hall· quant-ph

Lieb-Schultz-Mattis constraints for hyperbolic lattices

G. Shankar , Joseph Maciejko This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 16:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph
keywords Lieb-Schultz-Mattis theoremhyperbolic latticesground-state degeneracyFuchsian symmetryflux threadingspin liquidsquantum many-body systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Lieb-Schultz-Mattis theorem extends to hyperbolic lattices by adapting flux threading to Fuchsian symmetry, forcing ground-state degeneracy at fractional fillings.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper generalizes the Lieb-Schultz-Mattis theorem, which forbids unique symmetric gapped ground states at fractional fillings on ordinary lattices, to systems on hyperbolic lattices with negative curvature. The authors use hyperbolic band theory in a many-body setting to modify Oshikawa's flux-threading argument for the non-Euclidean translations given by Fuchsian groups. They obtain a lower bound on ground-state degeneracy that depends explicitly on the filling fraction and the lattice geometry. A reader would care because the result constrains the possible gapped phases in these curved spaces and identifies specific hyperbolic spin models as routes to symmetric spin liquids.

Core claim

Quantum many-body systems with a conserved particle number on periodic hyperbolic lattices cannot possess a unique, symmetric, and gapped ground state at fractional fillings. By threading flux through the system under the Fuchsian translation symmetry and employing many-body hyperbolic band theory, the construction produces a concrete lower bound on the degeneracy of any such ground state, with the bound set by the filling and the tessellation geometry.

What carries the argument

The flux-threading argument adapted to Fuchsian group translations via many-body hyperbolic band theory.

If this is right

  • Any gapped phase of hyperbolic quantum matter with conserved particle number must break symmetry or exhibit at least the computed degeneracy at fractional fillings.
  • Frustrated spin models on hyperbolic analogs of the square and triangular lattices can host symmetric spin liquids consistent with the bound.
  • The lower bound on degeneracy varies with both the filling fraction and the specific geometry of the hyperbolic lattice.
  • Consequences for gapped phases include either symmetry breaking or degeneracy in hyperbolic quantum matter.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same adaptation technique could be tested on other non-Euclidean lattices whose translation groups differ from both Euclidean and Fuchsian cases.
  • Numerical studies of small hyperbolic clusters at fractional filling could check whether the predicted degeneracy appears before the thermodynamic limit.
  • The bound may connect to the structure of topological order possible in negatively curved space.

Load-bearing premise

The Fuchsian translation symmetry of periodic hyperbolic lattices permits a direct adaptation of the Euclidean flux-threading construction without additional obstructions from curvature or non-commuting translations.

What would settle it

Discovery of a unique symmetric gapped ground state at a fractional filling on any periodic hyperbolic lattice would violate the derived lower bound on degeneracy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.15974 by G. Shankar, Joseph Maciejko.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Lower bound on the ground-state degeneracy (GSD), i.e., [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Lower bound on the ground-state degeneracy (GSD), i.e., [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Example of spin-1/2 valence-bond solid (VBS) state on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Lieb-Schultz-Mattis (LSM) theorem and its higher-dimensional extensions forbid the existence of a unique, symmetric, and gapped ground state at fractional fillings in quantum many-body systems with a conserved particle number (or spin angular momentum) and the conventional translation symmetry of Euclidean lattices. In this work, we propose a generalization of the LSM theorem to quantum many-body systems on hyperbolic lattices, i.e., regular tessellations of two-dimensional negatively curved space. By leveraging concepts from hyperbolic band theory in a many-body setting, we adapt Oshikawa's flux-threading argument to periodic hyperbolic lattices with a non-Euclidean (Fuchsian) translation symmetry and compute a lower-bound to the ground-state degeneracy as a function of filling and lattice geometry. We explore the consequences of LSM constraints for gapped phases of hyperbolic quantum matter and suggest frustrated spin models on hyperbolic analogs of the square and triangular lattices as promising platforms for realizing symmetric spin liquids in hyperbolic space.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to generalize the Lieb-Schultz-Mattis theorem to quantum many-body systems on hyperbolic lattices by adapting Oshikawa's flux-threading argument to periodic hyperbolic lattices with Fuchsian translation symmetry, leveraging hyperbolic band theory in a many-body setting. It computes a lower bound on ground-state degeneracy as a function of filling and lattice geometry, and explores consequences for gapped phases while suggesting frustrated spin models on hyperbolic analogs of square and triangular lattices as platforms for symmetric spin liquids.

Significance. If the adaptation of the flux-threading argument is rigorously justified, the result would extend LSM-type constraints to non-Euclidean geometries, providing a tool to constrain possible gapped symmetric phases in hyperbolic quantum matter. The concrete suggestion of specific spin models offers a clear direction for numerical studies and could stimulate work on frustrated magnetism in curved spaces.

major comments (2)
  1. [flux-threading adaptation] The adaptation of Oshikawa's flux-threading argument (in the section describing the many-body construction via hyperbolic band theory) assumes that the twisted boundary conditions yield the standard 2πν phase factor. However, the non-commuting Fuchsian generators imply that the corresponding many-body operators satisfy a non-trivial cocycle; the manuscript does not explicitly verify that flux insertion along different generators produces a single-valued phase independent of order, which is load-bearing for the claimed degeneracy lower bound.
  2. [degeneracy bound derivation] The central claim of a geometry- and filling-dependent lower bound on degeneracy rests on the transfer of the Euclidean argument without additional obstructions from curvature. No explicit derivation steps, reduction to the flat-space limit, or consistency checks (e.g., recovery of the standard LSM bound as curvature → 0) are supplied, leaving the correctness of the bound unverified.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract summarizes the result but does not state the explicit functional form of the lower bound on degeneracy; including this would improve clarity for readers.
  2. [main text] Notation for the Fuchsian translation operators and the associated many-body flux operators could be introduced with more care to distinguish them from their Euclidean counterparts.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable feedback on our work generalizing the Lieb-Schultz-Mattis theorem to hyperbolic lattices. We address each major comment in detail below and outline the revisions we plan to make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The adaptation of Oshikawa's flux-threading argument (in the section describing the many-body construction via hyperbolic band theory) assumes that the twisted boundary conditions yield the standard 2πν phase factor. However, the non-commuting Fuchsian generators imply that the corresponding many-body operators satisfy a non-trivial cocycle; the manuscript does not explicitly verify that flux insertion along different generators produces a single-valued phase independent of order, which is load-bearing for the claimed degeneracy lower bound.

    Authors: We acknowledge the importance of verifying the single-valuedness of the phase factor in the presence of non-commuting generators. In the manuscript, the flux-threading is implemented by modifying the boundary conditions in the hyperbolic band theory framework, where the many-body states transform under the Fuchsian group representations. The cocycle arises from the projective representation, but our construction ensures that the total phase accumulated upon inserting flux along a closed loop in the group is consistent due to the topological nature of the argument. However, to make this explicit, we will add a new paragraph in the relevant section deriving the commutator of the flux-insertion operators and showing that it commutes up to the expected phase factor of e^{i 2π ν}, independent of order. This will involve using the properties of the hyperbolic lattice symmetries. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The central claim of a geometry- and filling-dependent lower bound on degeneracy rests on the transfer of the Euclidean argument without additional obstructions from curvature. No explicit derivation steps, reduction to the flat-space limit, or consistency checks (e.g., recovery of the standard LSM bound as curvature → 0) are supplied, leaving the correctness of the bound unverified.

    Authors: The referee correctly points out that an explicit check in the flat-space limit would be beneficial for verifying the bound. We will revise the manuscript to include a detailed step-by-step derivation of the degeneracy lower bound, starting from the definition of the twisted many-body states using hyperbolic Bloch waves. Additionally, we will demonstrate the recovery of the standard LSM bound by considering the limit where the curvature approaches zero, which corresponds to the Fuchsian group generators approaching commuting translations. This limit will be shown to reproduce the known result for Euclidean lattices at the same filling. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Adaptation of Oshikawa argument via hyperbolic band theory shows no circular reduction

full rationale

The paper's central derivation adapts Oshikawa's external flux-threading argument to Fuchsian translation symmetry on hyperbolic lattices by invoking concepts from hyperbolic band theory. This step relies on cited external frameworks rather than any self-definitional loop, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain. No equation or claim reduces by construction to the paper's own inputs; the lower bound on ground-state degeneracy is presented as a consequence of the adapted symmetry argument, which remains independently verifiable against the validity of the non-Euclidean adaptation. The non-commuting nature of Fuchsian generators raises a potential correctness question about whether the phase factor closes identically, but this is an external validity concern, not a circularity in the derivation itself. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks and receives a normal non-finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the transferability of flux threading to Fuchsian symmetry and on standard many-body assumptions about conserved particle number and lattice periodicity.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Periodic hyperbolic lattices possess a well-defined Fuchsian translation symmetry that supports flux threading analogous to the Euclidean case.
    Invoked when adapting Oshikawa's argument to non-Euclidean lattices.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5696 in / 1111 out tokens · 79240 ms · 2026-05-20T16:38:38.343106+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

157 extracted references · 157 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    For an Abelian cluster, the commutator subgroup𝐺(1) is trivial, i.e., |𝐺 (1) |=1, thus Eq

    Abelian clusters If the normal subgroupΓPBC ◁Γis such that the factor group𝐺= Γ/Γ PBC is Abelian, we call the corresponding periodic hyperbolic lattice anAbelian cluster[21]. For an Abelian cluster, the commutator subgroup𝐺(1) is trivial, i.e., |𝐺 (1) |=1, thus Eq. (35) reduces to𝑉=𝐿 1𝐿2 · · ·𝐿2𝑔. The simplest type of Abelian cluster is obtained whenever ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    compactextra dimension

    Non-Abelian clusters If the factor group𝐺= Γ/Γ PBC is non-Abelian, we call the corresponding periodic hyperbolic lattice anon-Abelian cluster[21]. Inthiscase,thecommutatorsubgroup𝐺 (1) isno longertrivial:|𝐺 (1) |>1. Themomentumdifferenceinthe𝒆 ∗ 1 directionforfluxinsertionwith𝑚 1 =1isΔ𝑃 1 =2𝜋𝜈𝐶where now𝐶=|𝐺 (1) |𝐿 2 . . . 𝐿 𝑑. Thiscanbeinterpretedasthegeo...

    work page

  3. [3]

    fractional

    Abelian clusters The examples discussed above can be recovered as special cases of the general formula (38). For𝜈=𝑝/𝑞with𝑝, 𝑞 coprime,𝑁=𝑝𝑉/𝑞∈Zimplies that𝑞|𝑉(since𝑞∤𝑝). Consider first the case of an Abelian cluster, with𝑉=𝐿1𝐶 where𝐶=𝐿 2 · · ·𝐿2𝑔, and assume that𝐶is coprime with 𝑞[5], such that𝑞|𝐿 1. Then𝑁=𝑝(𝐿 1/𝑞)𝐶, and we have gcd(𝑁, 𝐿 𝑗 )=gcd 𝑝(𝐿 1/𝑞)𝐿 ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    If𝐺= Γ/Γ PBCis aperfectgroup,alltheelementarydivisorsaretrivial,𝐿 𝑗 =1, thusgcd(𝑁, 𝐿 𝑗 )=1

    Non-Abelian clusters Finally,weconsidernon-Abelianclusters. If𝐺= Γ/Γ PBCis aperfectgroup,alltheelementarydivisorsaretrivial,𝐿 𝑗 =1, thusgcd(𝑁, 𝐿 𝑗 )=1. Equation (38) then impliesGSD⩾1, i.e.,nonontrivialLSMconstraintcanbederived,asconcluded earlier. If𝐺isnon-Abelianbutnotperfect,then|𝐺 (1) |< 𝑉and 𝑁=(𝑝/𝑞)|𝐺 (1) |𝐿 1 · · ·𝐿2𝑔. We first observe that if𝑞divid...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Note that changing𝜈↦→𝜈+1does not affect the ground-state de- generacy formula since this corresponds to𝑁↦→𝑁+𝑉= 𝑁+ |𝐺 (1) |𝐿 1 · · ·𝐿2𝑔, but shifting𝑁by an integer multiple of 𝐿 𝑗 does not changegcd(𝑁, 𝐿 𝑗 ). Likewise, the ground-state degeneracyformulaisinvariantunderparticle-holesymmetry 𝜈↦→1−𝜈since this amounts to𝑁↦→𝑉−𝑁, which again corresponds to a shi...

    work page

  6. [6]

    see” the nontrivial LSM constraint, which can be understood from the existence of the “extra di- mension

    In both Figs. 1 and 2, the left panel presents data for Abelian clusters, and the right panel data for non-Abelian clusters. We repeat the calculation for 100 clusters of each type with several hundred sites, obtained by intersection𝐻 1 ∩𝐻 2 of randomly chosen pairs of normal subgroups𝐻 1, 𝐻2. Beginningwithhalffilling𝜈= 1 2 inFig.1, depending on the PBC c...

    work page

  7. [7]

    A similar effect is seen for𝜈= 1

    or 600 sites (remaining fillings). A similar effect is seen for𝜈= 1

    work page

  8. [8]

    intra-cell

    When𝑞in𝜈=𝑝/𝑞is not prime, as for𝜈= 1 4 , 1 6, the minimum degeneracy is not necessarily𝑞: we find that it can instead be one of the factors of𝑞, and indeed in the non-Abelian case, a minimum degen- eracy of 6 for𝜈= 1 6 is never predicted, at least for the choice of PBC clusters in Fig. 1. Similar results are found in Fig. 2, where we also include fillings...

    work page

  9. [9]

    engineer

    The number of sites per Bravais unit cell of the heptagon-kagome (HKG), octagon-kagome (OKG), and nonagon-kagome (NKG) lattices studied in Refs. [57, 58] is 84, 24, and 162, respectively (see Appendix B). Numerical studies were performed with four or five bosons in 98 sites (HKG), 104 sites (OKG), and 108 sites (NKG), resulting in fillings𝜈perunitcellof 2...

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    E. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain, Ann. Phys.16, 407 (1961)

    work page 1961

  11. [11]

    I.AffleckandE.H.Lieb,AproofofpartofHaldane’sconjec- ture on spin chains, Lett. Math. Phys.12, 57 (1986)

    work page 1986

  12. [12]

    Haldane Gap

    M. Oshikawa, M. Yamanaka, and I. Affleck, Magnetization Plateaus in Spin Chains: “Haldane Gap” for Half-Integer Spins, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 1984 (1997)

    work page 1984

  13. [13]

    I.Affleck,SpingapandsymmetrybreakinginCuO 2layersand other antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B37, 5186 (1988)

    work page 1988

  14. [14]

    Oshikawa, Commensurability, Excitation Gap, and Topol- ogy in Quantum Many-Particle Systems on a Periodic Lattice, Phys

    M. Oshikawa, Commensurability, Excitation Gap, and Topol- ogy in Quantum Many-Particle Systems on a Periodic Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 1535 (2000)

    work page 2000

  15. [15]

    M. B. Hastings, Lieb-Schultz-Mattis in higher dimensions, Phys. Rev. B69, 104431 (2004)

    work page 2004

  16. [16]

    M. B. Hastings, Sufficient conditions for topological order in insulators, Europhys. Lett.70, 824 (2005)

    work page 2005

  17. [17]

    Nachtergaele and R

    B. Nachtergaele and R. Sims, A Multi-Dimensional Lieb- Schultz-Mattis Theorem, Commun. Math. Phys.276, 437 (2007)

    work page 2007

  18. [18]

    A. J. Kollár, M. Fitzpatrick, and A. A. Houck, Hyperbolic lattices in circuit quantum electrodynamics, Nature571, 45 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    P. M. Lenggenhager, A. Stegmaier, L. K. Upreti, T. Hofmann, T. Helbig, A. Vollhardt, M. Greiter, C. H. Lee, S. Imhof, H. Brand, T. Kießling, I. Boettcher, T. Neupert, R. Thomale, andT.Bzdušek,Simulatinghyperbolicspaceonacircuitboard, Nat. Commun.13, 4373 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    13, 2937 (2022)

    W.Zhang,H.Yuan,N.Sun,H.Sun,andX.Zhang,Observation ofnoveltopologicalstatesinhyperboliclattices,Nat.Commun. 13, 2937 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    A. Chen, H. Brand, T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, S. Imhof, A. Fritzsche, T. Kießling, A. Stegmaier, L. K. Upreti, T. Ne- upert, T. Bzdušek, M. Greiter, R. Thomale, and I. Boettcher, Hyperbolic matter in electrical circuits with tunable complex phases, Nat. Commun.14, 622 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Commun.14, 1083 (2023)

    W.Zhang,F.Di,X.Zheng,H.Sun,andX.Zhang,Hyperbolic band topology with non-trivial second Chern numbers, Nat. Commun.14, 1083 (2023)

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Q. Chen, Z. Zhang, H. Qin, A. Bossart, Y. Yang, H. Chen, and R. Fleury, Anomalous and Chern topological waves in hyperbolic networks, Nat. Commun.15, 2293 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    L.Huang,L.He,W.Zhang,H.Zhang,D.Liu,X.Feng,F.Liu, K. Cui, Y. Huang, W. Zhang, and X. Zhang, Hyperbolic pho- tonic topological insulators, Nat. Commun.15, 1647 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    H. Yuan, W. Zhang, N. Sun, F. Di, W. Cao, and X. Zhang, Anomalous topological pumping in hyperbolic lattices, Sci. Bull.70, 3146 (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    X. Xu, A. A. Mahmoud, N. Gorgichuk, R. Thomale, S. Rayan, and M. Mariantoni, A Scalable Superconducting CircuitFrameworkforEmulatingPhysicsinHyperbolicSpace, arXiv:2510.23827 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Grass, D

    T. Grass, D. Bercioux, U. Bhattacharya, M. Lewenstein, H. S. Nguyen, and C. Weitenberg, Colloquium: Synthetic quantum matterinnonstandardgeometries,Rev.Mod.Phys.97,011001 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Boettcher, A

    I. Boettcher, A. V. Gorshkov, A. J. Kollár, J. Maciejko, S. Rayan, and R. Thomale, Crystallography of hyperbolic lat- tices, Phys. Rev. B105, 125118 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Maciejko and S

    J. Maciejko and S. Rayan, Hyperbolic band theory, Sci. Adv. 7, eabe9170 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    Maciejko and S

    J. Maciejko and S. Rayan, Automorphic Bloch theorems for hyperbolic lattices, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.119, e2116869119 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Cheng, F

    N. Cheng, F. Serafin, J. McInerney, Z. Rocklin, K. Sun, and X. Mao, Band Theory and Boundary Modes of High- Dimensional Representations of Infinite Hyperbolic Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 088002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Kienzle and S

    E. Kienzle and S. Rayan, Hyperbolic band theory through Higgs bundles, Adv. Math.409, 108664 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    P.M.Lenggenhager,J.Maciejko,andT.Bzdušek,Non-Abelian HyperbolicBandTheoryfromSupercells,Phys.Rev.Lett.131, 226401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Shankar and J

    G. Shankar and J. Maciejko, Hyperbolic Lattices and Two- DimensionalYang-MillsTheory,Phys.Rev.Lett.133,146601 18 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Mosseri and J

    R. Mosseri and J. Vidal, Density of states of tight-binding models in the hyperbolic plane, Phys. Rev. B108, 035154 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    F. R. Lux and E. Prodan, Spectral and Combinatorial Aspects of Cayley-Crystals, Ann. Henri Poincaré25, 3563 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    F.R.LuxandE.Prodan,ConvergingPeriodicBoundaryCon- ditions and Detection of Topological Gaps on Regular Hyper- bolic Tessellations, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 176603 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    S. Yu, X. Piao, and N. Park, Topological Hyperbolic Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 053901 (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    Neupert, and T

    D.M.Urwyler,P.M.Lenggenhager,I.Boettcher,R.Thomale, T. Neupert, and T. Bzdušek, Hyperbolic Topological Band In- sulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 246402 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    Z.-R.Liu,C.-B.Hua,T.Peng,andB.Zhou,Cherninsulatorin a hyperbolic lattice, Phys. Rev. B105, 245301 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Bzdušek and J

    T. Bzdušek and J. Maciejko, Flat bands and band-touching from real-space topology in hyperbolic lattices, Phys. Rev. B 106, 155146 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Mosseri, R

    R. Mosseri, R. Vogeler, and J. Vidal, Aharonov-Bohm cages, flat bands, and gap labeling in hyperbolic tilings, Phys. Rev. B 106, 155120 (2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    X.-Y.Huang,Y.Zhou,andP.Ye,Entanglementscalingbehav- iorsoffreefermionsonhyperboliclattices,Phys.Rev.Research 7, 023098 (2025)

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    N. P. Breuckmann and B. M. Terhal, Constructions and Noise ThresholdofHyperbolicSurfaceCodes,IEEETrans.Inf.The- ory62, 3731 (2016)

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    Jahn and J

    A. Jahn and J. Eisert, Holographic tensor network models and quantumerrorcorrection: atopicalreview,QuantumSci.Tech- nol.6, 033002 (2021)

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    Higgott and N

    O. Higgott and N. P. Breuckmann, Constructions and Perfor- mance of Hyperbolic and Semi-Hyperbolic Floquet Codes, PRX Quantum5, 040327 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    Boettcher, P

    I. Boettcher, P. Bienias, R. Belyansky, A. J. Kollár, and A. V. Gorshkov,Quantumsimulationofhyperbolicspacewithcircuit quantum electrodynamics: From graphs to geometry, Phys. Rev. A102, 032208 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    L.Boyle,M.Dickens,andF.Flicker,ConformalQuasicrystals and Holography, Phys. Rev. X10, 011009 (2020)

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    Asaduzzaman, S

    M. Asaduzzaman, S. Catterall, J. Hubisz, R. Nelson, and J. Unmuth-Yockey, Holography on tessellations of hyperbolic space, Phys. Rev. D102, 034511 (2020)

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    Basteiro, G

    P. Basteiro, G. Di Giulio, J. Erdmenger, J. Karl, R. Meyer, and Z.-Y. Xian, Towards explicit discrete holography: Aperi- odicspinchainsfromhyperbolictilings,SciPostPhys.13,103 (2022)

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    S. Dey, A. Chen, P. Basteiro, A. Fritzsche, M. Greiter, M. Kaminski, P. M. Lenggenhager, R. Meyer, R. Sorbello, A. Stegmaier, R. Thomale, J. Erdmenger, and I. Boettcher, Simulating Holographic Conformal Field Theories on Hyper- bolic Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 061603 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Bienias, I

    P. Bienias, I. Boettcher, R. Belyansky, A. J. Kollár, and A. V. Gorshkov, Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics in Hyperbolic Space: From Photon Bound States to Frustrated Spin Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 013601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Ebadi, T

    S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, A. Omran, D. Bluvstein, R. Samajdar, H. Pichler, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, S. Sachdev, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Quantumphasesofmatterona256-atomprogrammablequan- tum simulator, Nature595, 227 (2021)

    work page 2021

  54. [54]

    Periwal, E

    A. Periwal, E. S. Cooper, P. Kunkel, J. F. Wienand, E. J. Davis,andM.Schleier-Smith,Programmableinteractionsand emergent geometry in an array of atom clouds, Nature600, 630 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    X. Zhu, J. Guo, N. P. Breuckmann, H. Guo, and S. Feng, Quantumphasetransitionsofinteractingbosonsonhyperbolic lattices, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter33, 335602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  56. [56]

    A. Götz, G. Rein, J. C. Inácio, and F. F. Assaad, Hubbard andHeisenbergmodelsonhyperboliclattices: Metal-insulator transitions, global antiferromagnetism, and enhanced bound- ary fluctuations, Phys. Rev. B110, 235105 (2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    Roy, Magnetic catalysis in weakly interacting hyperbolic Dirac materials, Phys

    B. Roy, Magnetic catalysis in weakly interacting hyperbolic Dirac materials, Phys. Rev. B110, 245117 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    C. A. Leong and B. Roy, Amplified magnetic catalysis in non-Hermitian Euclidean and hyperbolic Dirac liquids, arXiv:2510.02304 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    C. A. Leong and B. Roy, Strained hyperbolic Dirac fermions: Zero modes, flat bands, and competing orders, arXiv:2511.16667 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    Gluscevich, A

    N. Gluscevich, A. Samanta, S. Manna, and B. Roy, Dynamic massgenerationontwo-dimensionalelectronichyperboliclat- tices, Phys. Rev. B111, L121108 (2025)

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    C. A. Leong and B. Roy, Non-Hermitian catalysis of sponta- neoussymmetrybreakingonEuclideanandhyperboliclattices, Phys. Rev. B113, 155152 (2026)

    work page 2026

  62. [62]

    D. Wang, T. Zhu, and Z. Yang, Hyperbolic altermagnets with high-fold spin splitting, Phys. Rev. B113, 064424 (2026)

    work page 2026

  63. [63]

    Inherent Altermagnetism on regular hyperbolic lattices

    E. Petermann, K. Mæland, H. Hinrichsen, and B. Trauzettel, Inherent Altermagnetism on regular hyperbolic lattices, arXiv:2605.10602 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  64. [64]

    V.Bashmakov,A.Iliasov,T.Bzdušek,andA.A.Bagrov,Super- conductivity in hyperbolic spaces: Regular hyperbolic lattices and Ginzburg-Landau theory, arXiv:2509.09330 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Pavliuk, T

    M. Pavliuk, T. Bzdušek, and A. Iliasov, Superconductivity in hyperbolic spaces: Cayley trees, hyperbolic continuum, and BCS theory, arXiv:2510.26528 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    A.-L.He,L.Qi,Y.Liu,andY.-F.Wang,Hyperbolicfractional Chern insulators, Phys. Rev. B110, 195113 (2024)

    work page 2024

  67. [67]

    He, X.-H

    A.-L. He, X.-H. Yan, L. Qi, Y. Han, and Y. Liu, Fractional Chern insulators on hyperbolic lattices with singularity, Phys. Rev. B112, 115114 (2025)

    work page 2025

  68. [68]

    A.-L. He, L. Qi, W.-W. Luo, and Y. Liu, Non-Abelian frac- tional Chern insulator on a hyperbolic lattice, Phys. Rev. B 112, 245140 (2025)

    work page 2025

  69. [69]

    P. M. Lenggenhager, S. Dey, T. Bzdušek, and J. Maciejko, HyperbolicSpinLiquids,Phys.Rev.Lett.135,076604(2025)

    work page 2025

  70. [70]

    Greiter, and R

    F.Dusel,T.Hofmann,A.Maity,R.Mosseri,J.Vidal,Y.Iqbal, M. Greiter, and R. Thomale, Chiral Gapless Spin Liquid in Hyperbolic Space, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 256604 (2025)

    work page 2025

  71. [71]

    R.Mosseri,Y.Iqbal,R.Vogeler,andJ.Vidal,Kitaevmodelon Hurwitz hyperbolic tilings: A non-Abelian gapped chiral spin liquid, Phys. Rev. B111, L060408 (2025)

    work page 2025

  72. [72]

    Vidal and R

    J. Vidal and R. Mosseri, Kitaev model in regular hyperbolic tilings, Phys. Rev. B112, 195106 (2025)

    work page 2025

  73. [73]

    C. Sun, A. Chen, T. Bzdušek, and J. Maciejko, Topological linear response of hyperbolic Chern insulators, SciPost Phys. 17, 124 (2024)

    work page 2024

  74. [74]

    A.ParamekantiandA.Vishwanath,ExtendingLuttinger’sthe- orem toZ 2 fractionalized phases of matter, Phys. Rev. B70, 245118 (2004)

    work page 2004

  75. [75]

    Watanabe, Insensitivity of bulk properties to the twisted boundary condition, Phys

    H. Watanabe, Insensitivity of bulk properties to the twisted boundary condition, Phys. Rev. B98, 155137 (2018)

    work page 2018

  76. [76]

    D.H.LeeandR.Shankar,SymmetrybreakinginMottinsula- tors, Phys. Rev. Lett.65, 1490 (1990)

    work page 1990

  77. [77]

    X. G. Wen, Vacuum degeneracy of chiral spin states in com- pactified space, Phys. Rev. B40, 7387 (1989)

    work page 1989

  78. [78]

    X. G. Wen, Mean-field theory of spin-liquid states with fi- 19 nite energy gap and topological orders, Phys. Rev. B44, 2664 (1991)

    work page 1991

  79. [79]

    Read and S

    N. Read and S. Sachdev, Large-𝑁expansion for frustrated quantum antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.66, 1773 (1991)

    work page 1991

  80. [80]

    Sachdev and N

    S. Sachdev and N. Read, Large𝑁expansion for frustrated and dopedquantumantiferromagnets,Int.J.Mod.Phys.B05,219 (1991)

    work page 1991

Showing first 80 references.