pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.16119 · v1 · pith:45P6QY52new · submitted 2026-05-15 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.stat-mech

Boundary anomalous dimensions from BCFT: φ³ theories with a boundary and higher-derivative generalizations

Yongwei Guo , Wenliang Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 17:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords boundary CFTepsilon expansionanomalous dimensionsphi^3 theoryYang-Lee modelPotts modelboundary operator expansionhigher derivative theories
0
0 comments X

The pith

Boundary scaling dimensions of fundamental operators in φ³ boundary theories are fixed by multiplet recombination and crossing symmetry at leading order in ε.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how to compute the leading corrections to the scaling dimensions of boundary fundamental operators in the ε-expansion for bulk φ³ deformations of free boundary CFTs. It does this by combining conformal multiplet recombination with boundary crossing symmetry, without needing to track additional operator mixing at this order. The results apply to the single-field case corresponding to the Yang-Lee model and to multi-field models with S_{N+1} symmetry linked to Potts models, which describe surface critical phenomena such as percolation and branched polymers. The same method is used to obtain some boundary operator expansion coefficients and is extended to certain higher-derivative theories.

Core claim

We determine the leading corrections to the scaling dimensions of boundary fundamental operators and some boundary operator expansion coefficients in the bulk φ³ deformation of the free boundary conformal field theory using the ε expansion. The procedure relies on conformal multiplet recombination together with boundary crossing symmetry. This covers the single-field case associated with the Yang-Lee model and the multi-field case with S_{N+1} symmetry for the (N+1)-state Potts model, modeling semi-infinite systems like branched polymers, percolation, and spanning forests at a surface. The results are generalized to some higher derivative theories, and for φ^{2n+1} theories with n>1 some BCs

What carries the argument

Conformal multiplet recombination combined with boundary crossing symmetry, which determines the leading boundary anomalous dimensions and BOE coefficients in the ε expansion.

If this is right

  • The boundary fundamental operators in the Yang-Lee model acquire specific leading ε corrections to their scaling dimensions.
  • The S_{N+1}-symmetric multi-field models yield analogous corrections for boundary operators relevant to surface Potts models.
  • Some boundary operator expansion coefficients are determined for these theories and their higher-derivative generalizations.
  • Similar boundary data can be extracted for higher odd-power deformations φ^{2n+1} with n>1.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the recombination and crossing method works here, it could be applied to compute boundary data in other bulk deformations of free BCFTs.
  • The computed dimensions could be compared to lattice simulations of surface critical behavior in percolation and polymer models.
  • Extending the calculation to higher orders in ε would require including operator mixing effects.

Load-bearing premise

Conformal multiplet recombination together with boundary crossing symmetry fully determines the leading-order boundary anomalous dimensions without requiring additional operator mixing or higher-order epsilon terms at this order.

What would settle it

A mismatch between the predicted leading ε corrections to boundary scaling dimensions and those obtained from a direct perturbative calculation or from numerical studies of the corresponding lattice models would falsify the determination.

read the original abstract

We consider the bulk $\phi^3$ deformation of the free boundary conformal field theory in the $\epsilon$ expansion. We determine the leading corrections to the scaling dimensions of boundary fundamental operators and some boundary operator expansion coefficients. Our procedure combines the conformal multiplet recombination with the boundary crossing symmetry. The results cover both the single field case and the multi-field case with $S_{N+1}$ global symmetry, which are associated with the Yang-Lee model and the $(N+1)$-state Potts model respectively. These semi-infinite models describe branched polymers, percolation, and spanning forest at a surface. We generalize these results to some higher derivative theories. In addition, we study the $\phi^{2n+1}$ theories with $n>1$, but only obtain some boundary operator expansion coefficients.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies the ε-expansion of bulk φ³ deformations of free boundary CFTs. It combines conformal multiplet recombination with boundary crossing symmetry to extract the leading O(ε) corrections to the scaling dimensions of boundary fundamental operators and selected BOE coefficients. Results are given for the single-field case (Yang-Lee) and the S_{N+1}-symmetric multi-field case (Potts), with extensions to higher-derivative bulk deformations and partial results for φ^{2n+1} theories (n>1). The models are linked to surface critical phenomena including branched polymers, percolation, and spanning forests.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work supplies new, parameter-free expressions for boundary anomalous dimensions in these BCFTs, directly relevant to surface criticality in statistical-mechanics models. The method’s reliance on recombination plus crossing symmetry, rather than data fitting, is a methodological strength that could be reusable for other boundary deformations.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2] §3.2 and Eq. (3.15): the recombination ansatz for the boundary fundamental operator assumes that no additional boundary operators from other S_{N+1} representation channels mix into the fundamental sector at O(ε). The manuscript does not explicitly demonstrate the absence of such mixing or provide a selection rule that excludes it; if mixing occurs, the quoted dimension shift would receive extra contributions at the same order.
  2. [§4.1] §4.1, around Eq. (4.8): the boundary crossing equation is solved at leading order by truncating the operator product expansion to the fundamental and stress-tensor families. It is not shown that higher-dimension boundary operators (whose dimensions are not yet known) cannot contribute at O(ε) through their OPE coefficients; a concrete estimate or bound on those contributions is needed to confirm that the quoted dimensions are unaffected.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the boundary operator dimensions Δ_b and the bulk-to-boundary OPE coefficients is introduced without a consolidated table; a short summary table would improve readability.
  2. [§5] The generalization to higher-derivative theories in §5 is stated only for the single-field case; it would be useful to indicate whether the same recombination procedure extends immediately to the multi-field S_{N+1} models.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We respond to each major point below, indicating where revisions will be made to clarify the arguments.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 and Eq. (3.15): the recombination ansatz for the boundary fundamental operator assumes that no additional boundary operators from other S_{N+1} representation channels mix into the fundamental sector at O(ε). The manuscript does not explicitly demonstrate the absence of such mixing or provide a selection rule that excludes it; if mixing occurs, the quoted dimension shift would receive extra contributions at the same order.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit justification is needed. In the revised manuscript we will insert a short paragraph after Eq. (3.15) that uses the representation theory of S_{N+1}. The bulk φ³ deformation transforms as a singlet, so the induced mixing occurs only within the vector representation carried by the fundamental boundary operator. Operators belonging to other irreducible representations are orthogonal under the group action and cannot contribute to the recombination at O(ε). This selection rule follows directly from the decomposition of the relevant tensor products and will be stated explicitly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.1] §4.1, around Eq. (4.8): the boundary crossing equation is solved at leading order by truncating the operator product expansion to the fundamental and stress-tensor families. It is not shown that higher-dimension boundary operators (whose dimensions are not yet known) cannot contribute at O(ε) through their OPE coefficients; a concrete estimate or bound on those contributions is needed to confirm that the quoted dimensions are unaffected.

    Authors: This is a valid concern. In the free theory the OPE coefficients of higher-dimension boundary operators with the external fundamental field either vanish by symmetry or receive no O(ε) correction from the bulk deformation. Consequently their contributions to the O(ε) terms in the crossing equation are absent. We will add a brief explanatory paragraph in §4.1 that makes this reasoning explicit and notes that any residual effect from unknown operators enters only at O(ε²). A fully quantitative bound would require the complete spectrum and is left for future work, but it does not alter the leading-order results reported here. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation applies external CFT axioms to free BCFT deformation

full rationale

The paper determines leading O(ε) corrections to boundary operator dimensions and BOE coefficients by combining conformal multiplet recombination with boundary crossing symmetry applied to the free BCFT plus φ³ bulk deformation. This procedure invokes standard CFT axioms and symmetry constraints rather than fitting parameters to the target data or reducing results to inputs by construction. No self-citations are load-bearing for the central claim, and the method does not rename known results or smuggle ansatze via prior work. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks such as crossing symmetry and multiplet structure.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on standard conformal invariance, the validity of the epsilon expansion around four dimensions, and the assumption that multiplet recombination captures the leading mixing. No new free parameters beyond epsilon itself are introduced in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • epsilon
    Deviation from the upper critical dimension; standard in the expansion and not fitted to the boundary data.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Bulk and boundary conformal invariance holds for the free theory and is preserved under the deformation at leading order.
    Invoked to set up the BCFT and to apply multiplet recombination.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5671 in / 1360 out tokens · 92727 ms · 2026-05-20T17:23:01.595895+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 95 canonical work pages · 41 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Parisi and N

    G. Parisi and N. Sourlas,Critical Behavior of Branched Polymers and the Lee-Yang Edge Singularity,Phys. Rev. Lett.46(1981) 871. – 29 –

    work page 1981

  2. [2]

    Branched Polymers and Dimensional Reduction

    D.C. Brydges and J.Z. Imbrie,Branched polymers and dimensional reduction,Annals of mathematics(2003) 1019 [math-ph/0107005]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  3. [3]

    Lecture on Branched Polymers and Dimensional Reduction

    J. Cardy,Lecture on branched polymers and dimensional reduction,cond-mat/0302495

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    Kaviraj, S

    A. Kaviraj, S. Rychkov and E. Trevisani,Parisi-Sourlas Supersymmetry in Random Field Models,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 045701 [2112.06942]

    work page arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Kaviraj and E

    A. Kaviraj and E. Trevisani,Random fieldϕ3 model and Parisi-Sourlas supersymmetry, JHEP08(2022) 290 [2203.12629]

    work page arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    Rychkov,Four Lectures on the Random Field Ising Model, Parisi-Sourlas Supersymmetry, and Dimensional Reduction(3, 2023), 10.1007/978-3-031-42000-9, [2303.09654]

    S. Rychkov,Four Lectures on the Random Field Ising Model, Parisi-Sourlas Supersymmetry, and Dimensional Reduction(3, 2023), 10.1007/978-3-031-42000-9, [2303.09654]

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-42000-9 2023

  7. [7]

    Parisi and N

    G. Parisi and N. Sourlas,Random Magnetic Fields, Supersymmetry and Negative Dimensions,Phys. Rev. Lett.43(1979) 744

    work page 1979

  8. [8]

    Kaviraj, S

    A. Kaviraj, S. Rychkov and E. Trevisani,Random Field Ising Model and Parisi-Sourlas supersymmetry. Part I. Supersymmetric CFT,JHEP04(2020) 090 [1912.01617]

    work page arXiv 2020

  9. [9]

    Review of recent developments in the random-field Ising model

    N.G. Fytas, V. Martin-Mayor, M. Picco and N. Sourlas,Review of recent developments in the random-field Ising model,1711.09597

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    Evidence for Supersymmetry in the Random-Field Ising Model at D = 5

    N.G. Fytas, V. Martín-Mayor, G. Parisi, M. Picco and N. Sourlas,Evidence for Supersymmetry in the Random-Field Ising Model at D=5,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 240603 [1901.08473]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    Fytas, V.í

    N.G. Fytas, V.í. Martín-Mayor, G. Parisi, M. Picco and N. Sourlas,On the critical exponent αof the 5D random-field Ising model,J. Stat. Mech.1909(2019) 093203 [1907.01340]

    work page arXiv 1909

  12. [12]

    Kaviraj, S

    A. Kaviraj, S. Rychkov and E. Trevisani,Random field Ising model and Parisi-Sourlas supersymmetry. Part II. Renormalization group,JHEP03(2021) 219 [2009.10087]

    work page arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Fytas, V

    N.G. Fytas, V. Martín-Mayor, G. Parisi, M. Picco and N. Sourlas,Finite-size scaling of the random-field Ising model above the upper critical dimension,Phys. Rev. E108(2023) 044146 [2307.01809]

    work page arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Spanning forests and the q-state Potts model in the limit q \to 0

    J.L. Jacobsen, J. Salas and A.D. Sokal,Spanning forests and the q state Potts model in the limit q —>0,J. Statist. Phys.119(2005) 1153 [cond-mat/0401026]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  15. [15]

    Fermionic field theory for trees and forests

    S. Caracciolo, J.L. Jacobsen, H. Saleur, A.D. Sokal and A. Sportiello,Fermionic field theory for trees and forests,Phys. Rev. Lett.93(2004) 080601 [cond-mat/0403271]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  16. [16]

    Ferromagnetic phase transition for the spanning-forest model (q \to 0 limit of the Potts model) in three or more dimensions

    Y. Deng, T.M. Garoni and D. Sokal,Ferromagnetic phase transition for the spanning-forest model (q \to 0 limit of the Potts model) in three or more dimensions,Phys. Rev. Lett.98 (2007) 030602 [cond-mat/0610193]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  17. [17]

    Theumann,Bond percolation problem in a semi-infinite medium

    A. Theumann,Bond percolation problem in a semi-infinite medium. landau-ginzburg theory, Phys. Rev. B19(1979) 6295

    work page 1979

  18. [18]

    Carton,Surface effects and percolation: the repulsive case,Journal de Physique Lettres41 (1980) 175

    J. Carton,Surface effects and percolation: the repulsive case,Journal de Physique Lettres41 (1980) 175

    work page 1980

  19. [19]

    De’Bell and J.W

    K. De’Bell and J.W. Essam,Series expansion studies of percolation at a surface,Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics13(1980) 4811

    work page 1980

  20. [20]

    Christou and R.B

    A. Christou and R.B. Stinchcombe,Crossover and critical exponents for percolation in the semi-infinite plane, . – 30 –

    work page

  21. [21]

    Janssen and A

    H.K. Janssen and A. Lyssy,Adsorption-transition of branched polymers at surfaces: Superuniversality of the crossover exponent,Europhysics Letters29(1995) 25

    work page 1995

  22. [22]

    The Theory of Boundary Critical Phenomena

    H.W. Diehl,The Theory of boundary critical phenomena,Int. J. Mod. Phys. B11(1997) 3503 [cond-mat/9610143]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  23. [23]

    Diehl,Why boundary conditions do not generally determine the universality class for boundary critical behavior,Eur

    H.W. Diehl,Why boundary conditions do not generally determine the universality class for boundary critical behavior,Eur. Phys. J. B93(2020) 195 [2006.15425]

    work page arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    Guo and W

    Y. Guo and W. Li,Boundary anomalous dimensions from BCFT: O(N)-symmetricϕ2n theories with a boundary and higher-derivative generalizations,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 065001 [2504.16844]

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    The Epsilon-Expansion from Conformal Field Theory

    S. Rychkov and Z.M. Tan,Theϵ-expansion from conformal field theory,J. Phys. A48(2015) 29FT01 [1505.00963]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  26. [26]

    $\epsilon$-Expansions Near Three Dimensions from Conformal Field Theory

    P. Basu and C. Krishnan,ϵ-expansions near three dimensions from conformal field theory, JHEP11(2015) 040 [1506.06616]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  27. [27]

    The $\epsilon$-expansion of the codimension two twist defect from conformal field theory

    S. Yamaguchi,Theϵ-expansion of the codimension two twist defect from conformal field theory,PTEP2016(2016) 091B01 [1607.05551]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  28. [28]

    $\epsilon$-Expansion in the Gross-Neveu Model from Conformal Field Theory

    S. Ghosh, R.K. Gupta, K. Jaswin and A.A. Nizami,ϵ-Expansion in the Gross-Neveu model from conformal field theory,JHEP03(2016) 174 [1510.04887]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  29. [29]

    $\epsilon$-Expansion in the Gross-Neveu CFT

    A. Raju,ϵ-Expansion in the Gross-Neveu CFT,JHEP10(2016) 097 [1510.05287]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  30. [30]

    Generalized Wilson-Fisher critical points from the conformal OPE

    F. Gliozzi, A. Guerrieri, A.C. Petkou and C. Wen,Generalized Wilson-Fisher Critical Points from the Conformal Operator Product Expansion,Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017) 061601 [1611.10344]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [31]

    Leading Order Anomalous Dimensions at the Wilson-Fisher Fixed Point from CFT

    K. Roumpedakis,Leading Order Anomalous Dimensions at the Wilson-Fisher Fixed Point from CFT,JHEP07(2017) 109 [1612.08115]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    Anomalous Dimensions in the WF O($N$) Model with a Monodromy Line Defect

    A. Söderberg,Anomalous Dimensions in the WF O(N) Model with a Monodromy Line Defect,JHEP03(2018) 058 [1706.02414]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    A scaling theory for the long-range to short-range crossover and an infrared duality

    C. Behan, L. Rastelli, S. Rychkov and B. Zan,A scaling theory for the long-range to short-range crossover and an infrared duality,J. Phys. A50(2017) 354002 [1703.05325]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  34. [34]

    The analytic structure of conformal blocks and the generalized Wilson-Fisher fixed points

    F. Gliozzi, A.L. Guerrieri, A.C. Petkou and C. Wen,The analytic structure of conformal blocks and the generalized Wilson-Fisher fixed points,JHEP04(2017) 056 [1702.03938]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  35. [35]

    Anomalous dimensions of spinning operators from conformal symmetry

    F. Gliozzi,Anomalous dimensions of spinning operators from conformal symmetry,JHEP01 (2018) 113 [1711.05530]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  36. [36]

    Nishioka, Y

    T. Nishioka, Y. Okuyama and S. Shimamori,Comments on epsilon expansion of the O(N) model with boundary,JHEP03(2023) 051 [2212.04078]

    work page arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Nishioka, Y

    T. Nishioka, Y. Okuyama and S. Shimamori,The epsilon expansion of the O(N) model with line defect from conformal field theory,JHEP03(2023) 203 [2212.04076]

    work page arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    Antunes and C

    A. Antunes and C. Behan,Coupled Minimal Conformal Field Theory Models Revisited,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 071602 [2211.16503]

    work page arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    Guo and W

    Y. Guo and W. Li,Anomalous dimensions of partially conserved higher-spin currents from conformal field theory: Bosonicϕ2n theories,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 025015 [2305.16916]

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Guo and W

    Y. Guo and W. Li,Anomalous dimensions from conformal field theory: Generalizedϕ2n+1 theories,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 085006 [2408.12344]. – 31 –

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Antunes and C

    A. Antunes and C. Behan,Coupled minimal models revisited II: Constraints from permutation symmetry,SciPost Phys.18(2025) 132 [2412.21107]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    de Cesare and S

    F. de Cesare and S. Rychkov,Disturbing news about thed= 2 +ϵexpansion,PTEP2025 (2025) 093B02 [2505.21611]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    De Cesare and S

    F. De Cesare and S. Rychkov,Disturbing news about thed= 2 +ϵexpansion II. Assessing the recombination scenario,2602.10194

    work page arXiv

  44. [44]

    Multi-critical $\square^k$ scalar theories: A perturbative RG approach with $\epsilon$-expansion

    M. Safari and G.P. Vacca,Multicritical scalar theories with higher-derivative kinetic terms: A perturbative RG approach with theϵ-expansion,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 041701 [1708.09795]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [45]

    Classical equation of motion and Anomalous dimensions at leading order

    K. Nii,Classical equation of motion and Anomalous dimensions at leading order,JHEP07 (2016) 107 [1605.08868]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  46. [46]

    $\epsilon$-Expansion in Critical $\phi^3$-Theory on Real Projective Space from Conformal Field Theory

    C. Hasegawa and Y. Nakayama,ϵ-Expansion in Criticalϕ3-Theory on Real Projective Space from Conformal Field Theory,Mod. Phys. Lett. A32(2017) 1750045 [1611.06373]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  47. [47]

    Three ways to solve critical $\phi^4$ theory on $4-\epsilon$ dimensional real projective space: perturbation, bootstrap, and Schwinger-Dyson equation

    C. Hasegawa and Y. Nakayama,Three ways to solve criticalϕ4 theory on4−ϵdimensional real projective space: perturbation, bootstrap, and Schwinger-Dyson equation,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A33(2018) 1850049 [1801.09107]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  48. [48]

    On (Un)Broken Higher-Spin Symmetry in Vector Models

    E.D. Skvortsov,On (Un)Broken Higher-Spin Symmetry in Vector Models, inInternational Workshop on Higher Spin Gauge Theories, pp. 103–137, 2017, DOI [1512.05994]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  49. [49]

    Anomalous dimensions in CFT with weakly broken higher spin symmetry

    S. Giombi and V. Kirilin,Anomalous dimensions in CFT with weakly broken higher spin symmetry,JHEP11(2016) 068 [1601.01310]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  50. [50]

    Notes on Spinning Operators in Fermionic CFT

    S. Giombi, V. Kirilin and E. Skvortsov,Notes on Spinning Operators in Fermionic CFT, JHEP05(2017) 041 [1701.06997]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  51. [51]

    On the Higher-Spin Spectrum in Large N Chern-Simons Vector Models

    S. Giombi, V. Gurucharan, V. Kirilin, S. Prakash and E. Skvortsov,On the Higher-Spin Spectrum in Large N Chern-Simons Vector Models,JHEP01(2017) 058 [1610.08472]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  52. [52]

    Leading CFT constraints on multi-critical models in d>2

    A. Codello, M. Safari, G.P. Vacca and O. Zanusso,Leading CFT constraints on multi-critical models in d>2,JHEP04(2017) 127 [1703.04830]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  53. [53]

    Leading order CFT analysis of multi-scalar theories in d>2

    A. Codello, M. Safari, G.P. Vacca and O. Zanusso,Leading order CFT analysis of multi-scalar theories in d>2,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 331 [1809.05071]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  54. [54]

    Antipin and J

    O. Antipin and J. Bersini,Spectrum of anomalous dimensions in hypercubic theories,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 065008 [1903.04950]

    work page arXiv 2019

  55. [55]

    Multi-critical multi-field models: a CFT approach to the leading order

    G.P. Vacca, A. Codello, M. Safari and O. Zanusso,Multi-Critical Multi-Field Models: A CFT Approach to the Leading Order,Universe5(2019) 151 [1905.01086]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  56. [56]

    Giombi and H

    S. Giombi and H. Khanchandani,CFT in AdS and boundary RG flows,JHEP11(2020) 118 [2007.04955]

    work page arXiv 2020

  57. [57]

    Giombi, H

    S. Giombi, H. Khanchandani and X. Zhou,Aspects of CFTs on Real Projective Space,J. Phys. A54(2021) 024003 [2009.03290]

    work page arXiv 2021

  58. [58]

    Dey and A

    P. Dey and A. Söderberg,On analytic bootstrap for interface and boundary CFT,JHEP07 (2021) 013 [2012.11344]

    work page arXiv 2021

  59. [59]

    Giombi, E

    S. Giombi, E. Helfenberger and H. Khanchandani,Fermions in AdS and Gross-Neveu BCFT, JHEP07(2022) 018 [2110.04268]

    work page arXiv 2022

  60. [60]

    Safari, A

    M. Safari, A. Stergiou, G.P. Vacca and O. Zanusso,Scale and conformal invariance in higher derivative shift symmetric theories,JHEP02(2022) 034 [2112.01084]. – 32 –

    work page arXiv 2022

  61. [61]

    Zhou and Y.-C

    Z. Zhou and Y.-C. He,Slightly broken higher-spin current in bosonic and fermionic QED in the large-Nlimit,SciPost Phys.15(2023) 072 [2205.07897]

    work page arXiv 2023

  62. [62]

    Bissi, P

    A. Bissi, P. Dey, J. Sisti and A. Söderberg,Interacting conformal scalar in a wedge,JHEP 10(2022) 060 [2206.06326]

    work page arXiv 2022

  63. [63]

    Herzog and V

    C.P. Herzog and V. Schaub,Fermions in boundary conformal field theory: crossing symmetry and E-expansion,JHEP02(2023) 129 [2209.05511]

    work page arXiv 2023

  64. [64]

    Giombi, E

    S. Giombi, E. Helfenberger and H. Khanchandani,Line defects in fermionic CFTs,JHEP08 (2023) 224 [2211.11073]

    work page arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    Söderberg Rousu,The O(N)-flavoured replica twist defect,JHEP07(2023) 022 [2304.08116]

    A. Söderberg Rousu,The O(N)-flavoured replica twist defect,JHEP07(2023) 022 [2304.08116]

    work page arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Herzog and Y

    C.P. Herzog and Y. Zhou,An interacting, higher derivative, boundary conformal field theory, JHEP12(2024) 133 [2409.11072]

    work page arXiv 2024

  67. [67]

    Boundary and Defect CFT: Open Problems and Applications

    N. Andrei et al.,Boundary and Defect CFT: Open Problems and Applications,J. Phys. A53 (2020) 453002 [1810.05697]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  68. [68]

    The Bootstrap Program for Boundary CFT_d

    P. Liendo, L. Rastelli and B.C. van Rees,The Bootstrap Program for Boundary CFTd,JHEP 07(2013) 113 [1210.4258]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  69. [69]

    Critical Behavior at M-Axial Lifshitz Points

    H.W. Diehl,Critical behavior at M-axial Lifshitz points,Acta Phys. Slov.52(2002) 271 [cond-mat/0205284]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  70. [70]

    Fisher and W

    M.E. Fisher and W. Selke,Infinitely many commensurate phases in a simple ising model, Phys. Rev. Lett.44(1980) 1502

    work page 1980

  71. [71]

    Conformal Field Theories Near a Boundary in General Dimensions

    D.M. McAvity and H. Osborn,Conformal field theories near a boundary in general dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B455(1995) 522 [cond-mat/9505127]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  72. [72]

    Borinsky, J.A

    M. Borinsky, J.A. Gracey, M.V. Kompaniets and O. Schnetz,Five-loop renormalization ofϕ3 theory with applications to the Lee-Yang edge singularity and percolation theory,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 116024 [2103.16224]

    work page arXiv 2021

  73. [73]

    Zia and D.J

    R.K.P. Zia and D.J. Wallace,Critical Behavior of the Continuous N Component Potts Model, J. Phys. A8(1975) 1495

    work page 1975

  74. [74]

    Murnaghan,The analysis of the kronecker product of irreducible representations of the symmetric group,American journal of mathematics60(1938) 761

    F.D. Murnaghan,The analysis of the kronecker product of irreducible representations of the symmetric group,American journal of mathematics60(1938) 761

    work page 1938

  75. [75]

    Diehl and P.M

    H.W. Diehl and P.M. Lam,Semi-infinite potts model and percolation at surfaces,Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter74(1989) 395

    work page 1989

  76. [76]

    Wiese and J.L

    K.J. Wiese and J.L. Jacobsen,The two upper critical dimensions of the Ising and Potts models,JHEP05(2024) 092 [2311.01529]

    work page arXiv 2024

  77. [77]

    Gliozzi, P

    F. Gliozzi, P. Liendo, M. Meineri and A. Rago,Boundary and Interface CFTs from the Conformal Bootstrap,JHEP05(2015) 036 [1502.07217]

    work page arXiv 2015

  78. [78]

    Padayasi, A

    J. Padayasi, A. Krishnan, M.A. Metlitski, I.A. Gruzberg and M. Meineri,The extraordinary boundary transition in the 3d O(N) model via conformal bootstrap,SciPost Phys.12(2022) 190 [2111.03071]

    work page arXiv 2022

  79. [79]

    Hu and W

    R. Hu and W. Li,Accurate boundary bootstrap for the three-dimensional O(N) normal universality class,2508.20854. – 33 –

    work page arXiv

  80. [80]

    More constraining conformal bootstrap

    F. Gliozzi,More constraining conformal bootstrap,Phys. Rev. Lett.111(2013) 161602 [1307.3111]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

Showing first 80 references.