pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.16228 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-15 · ✦ hep-ex

Observation of a B_c^{*+} meson with the ATLAS detector

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 18:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex
keywords B_c^* mesonATLASLHCquarkoniummeson observationmass measurementB_c^+photon conversion
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

ATLAS observes the B_c^{*+} meson decaying to B_c^+ plus a photon with over 8 sigma significance

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports the first observation of an excited state of the B_c meson that decays to the ground-state B_c^+ plus a photon. Using 140 fb^{-1} of 13 TeV proton-proton collision data, the ATLAS experiment reconstructs B_c^+ candidates through a three-muon final state and pairs them with photons that convert to electron-positron pairs inside the detector. A peak appears at a mass difference of 64.5 MeV above the known B_c^+ mass, reaching a significance exceeding eight standard deviations. This small splitting agrees with theoretical predictions for the lowest vector state of the bottom-charm quarkonium system.

Core claim

The ATLAS experiment observes a new meson state decaying to B_c^+ and a photon. The measured mass difference is 64.5 ± 1.4 (stat.) +1.0/-1.4 (syst.) MeV, corresponding to a mass of 6339.0 ± 1.4 (stat.) +1.0/-1.4 (syst.) ± 0.3 (m_{B_c^+}) MeV for the new state. The observation has a significance greater than 8 standard deviations, and the low mass difference matches expectations for the lowest vector state of the b-bar c quarkonium system, identified as the B_c^{*+}.

What carries the argument

Reconstruction of B_c^+ mesons in the three-muon decay channel together with photons reconstructed via conversions to electron-positron pairs, used to build the mass-difference spectrum and isolate the signal peak.

If this is right

  • The result establishes the existence of the B_c^{*+} as the first observed excited state in the B_c family.
  • The measured mass splitting of approximately 65 MeV aligns with theoretical models for heavy-quark bound states.
  • This measurement provides a reference point for searches of additional decay modes or production properties of the B_c^{*+}.
  • The observation strengthens the case for further precision studies of the b c quarkonium system at the LHC.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Independent confirmation at CMS or LHCb would add robustness to the state identification.
  • The measured mass value can serve as input to refine potential models in heavy-quark spectroscopy.
  • The converted-photon technique shown here may be reusable for other rare radiative transitions in heavy mesons.
  • Production cross-section measurements of the B_c^{*+} become feasible with existing or future data samples.

Load-bearing premise

The photons reconstructed via conversions to electron-positron pairs in the detector material, together with the three-muon final state, correctly isolate the signal without significant contamination from misidentified backgrounds or other processes that could produce a fake peak at the reported mass difference.

What would settle it

An independent measurement in a different experiment or with substantially higher statistics that finds a mass difference far from 64.5 MeV would falsify the identification of the observed state as the expected B_c^{*+}.

read the original abstract

The first observation of a new meson state decaying into $B_c^+$ and a photon is presented using a dataset of $pp$ collisions at a centre-of-mass energy $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV collected by the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 140 fb$^{-1}$. The $B_c^+$ mesons are reconstructed from a three-muon final state from $B_c^+\to J/\psi(\mu^+\mu^-)\mu^+\nu_\mu X$ decays, along with photons reconstructed via conversions to electron-positron pairs in the detector material. The new state is observed with a significance that exceeds 8 standard deviations. The mass difference between the new meson state and the ground-state $B_c^+$ meson is measured to be $64.5 \pm 1.4\text{(stat.)}^{+1.0}_{-1.4}\text{(syst.)}$ MeV. This corresponds to a mass for the observed state of $6339.0 \pm 1.4\text{(stat.)}^{+1.0}_{-1.4}\text{(syst.)}\pm 0.3(m_{B_c^+})$ MeV, where the last uncertainty is due to the precision of the best knowledge of the $B_c^+$ meson mass. The low mass difference value matches the theory expectations for the lowest vector state of the $\bar{b}c$ quarkonium system, the $B_c^{*+}$ meson.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first observation of a new meson state decaying to B_c^+ γ using 140 fb^{-1} of 13 TeV pp collision data collected with the ATLAS detector. The B_c^+ is reconstructed via the three-muon final state B_c^+ → J/ψ(μ^+μ^-)μ^+ν_μ X, with photons identified through conversions to e^+e^- pairs in the detector material. The new state is observed with a significance exceeding 8 standard deviations, and the mass difference Δm = m(B_c^+ γ) − m(B_c^+) is measured to be 64.5 ± 1.4 (stat.)^{+1.0}_{-1.4} (syst.) MeV, corresponding to a mass of 6339.0 ± 1.4 (stat.)^{+1.0}_{-1.4} (syst.) ± 0.3 (m_{B_c^+}) MeV, consistent with theoretical expectations for the B_c^{*+} vector state.

Significance. If the background modeling and photon reconstruction are robust, this would represent the first experimental observation of the B_c^{*+} meson, providing direct validation of quarkonium mass predictions for the lowest vector state in the b c-bar system and enabling future studies of B_c spectroscopy at hadron colliders. The reported significance and precise mass difference strengthen the result's impact on heavy-flavor physics.

major comments (2)
  1. [signal extraction and background modeling] § on signal extraction and background modeling: The >8σ significance and the narrow peak at Δm = 64.5 MeV rest on the assumption that the background in the converted-photon + three-muon mass-difference spectrum is smooth and well-modeled; however, the missing neutrino in the B_c^+ reconstruction combined with material-conversion photon selection can introduce correlations that sculpt artificial structures, and the manuscript provides insufficient quantitative validation (e.g., via sideband studies or alternative background parametrizations) to exclude a fake peak from mis-reconstructed conversions or combinatorial backgrounds.
  2. [Photon reconstruction section] Photon reconstruction section: The reliance on converted photons (rather than calorimeter photons) for the low-energy photon from B_c^{*+} → B_c^+ γ requires precise modeling of conversion probability, material map, and π^0 → γγ feed-down; any small mismodeling in conversion radius or efficiency can shift or create a peak near 64.5 MeV, and the paper should include dedicated systematic studies or efficiency maps to demonstrate robustness.
minor comments (2)
  1. [results section] The abstract and results section should explicitly state the number of observed signal events and the fitted signal yield to allow direct assessment of the statistical power.
  2. [Figure on Δm distribution] Figure showing the Δm distribution: the caption should clarify the background parametrization used (e.g., polynomial order or sideband method) and indicate the fit range.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We have addressed each major comment below and will incorporate additional validation studies in the revised version to further demonstrate the robustness of our background modeling and photon reconstruction.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [signal extraction and background modeling] § on signal extraction and background modeling: The >8σ significance and the narrow peak at Δm = 64.5 MeV rest on the assumption that the background in the converted-photon + three-muon mass-difference spectrum is smooth and well-modeled; however, the missing neutrino in the B_c^+ reconstruction combined with material-conversion photon selection can introduce correlations that sculpt artificial structures, and the manuscript provides insufficient quantitative validation (e.g., via sideband studies or alternative background parametrizations) to exclude a fake peak from mis-reconstructed conversions or combinatorial backgrounds.

    Authors: We agree that robust validation of the background shape is essential. In the current manuscript the background is parametrized with a third-order polynomial fitted in sideband regions of the Δm distribution. We have cross-checked this choice with alternative forms (exponential and Chebyshev polynomials of order 2–4) and find the extracted signal yield and significance remain stable within statistical uncertainties. Sideband studies in the B_c^+ candidate mass and in photon-conversion control samples show no peaking structures near 64.5 MeV. To respond directly to the referee, we will add these alternative parametrizations and explicit sideband validation figures to the revised manuscript, together with a short discussion of possible correlations induced by the missing neutrino. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Photon reconstruction section] Photon reconstruction section: The reliance on converted photons (rather than calorimeter photons) for the low-energy photon from B_c^{*+} → B_c^+ γ requires precise modeling of conversion probability, material map, and π^0 → γγ feed-down; any small mismodeling in conversion radius or efficiency can shift or create a peak near 64.5 MeV, and the paper should include dedicated systematic studies or efficiency maps to demonstrate robustness.

    Authors: We chose converted-photon reconstruction because the photon energy is only ~65 MeV, where the calorimeter energy resolution is insufficient. The simulation employs a detailed material map to model conversion probability and radius. Systematic uncertainties already include variations of the material budget and conversion efficiency. In the revised manuscript we will add dedicated efficiency maps versus conversion radius, explicit studies of π^0 feed-down, and a table showing the effect of material-map variations on the fitted peak position and significance. These additions will provide the quantitative demonstration of robustness requested by the referee. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in experimental observation

full rationale

The paper reports a direct experimental measurement of a mass difference in the converted-photon plus three-muon spectrum from 140 fb^{-1} of 13 TeV pp data. The >8 sigma significance and Delta m = 64.5 MeV value are extracted from a data-driven fit to the observed distribution; the assignment to the B_c^{*+} state follows from comparison to independent external theoretical expectations for the vector b-bar c state. No step in the analysis chain reduces by construction to a self-definition, a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation. The result remains self-contained against external benchmarks including the known B_c^+ mass and prior theory calculations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard experimental assumptions about detector response, background modeling, and the accuracy of photon conversion reconstruction rather than new theoretical postulates or free parameters fitted to the target result.

free parameters (1)
  • mass-difference fit parameter
    The central value 64.5 MeV is extracted from a fit to the observed mass-difference distribution.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Photon conversions in detector material can be reconstructed with sufficient efficiency and resolution to isolate the signal
    This is the method used to detect the photon in the decay B_c^{*+} → B_c^+ γ.
  • domain assumption The known B_c^+ mass can be used to convert the measured mass difference into an absolute mass
    The absolute mass is reported with an additional uncertainty from the B_c^+ mass precision.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5805 in / 1535 out tokens · 95256 ms · 2026-05-19T18:14:51.096680+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · 41 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Brambilla et al.,Heavy Quarkonium Physics, 2004, arXiv:hep-ph/0412158

    N. Brambilla et al.,Heavy Quarkonium Physics, 2004, arXiv:hep-ph/0412158

  2. [2]

    Chen and Y.-P

    Y.-Q. Chen and Y.-P. Kuang, Improved QCD-motivated heavy-quark potentials with explicitΛM𝑆 dependence, Phys. Rev. D46(1992) 1165

  3. [3]

    L. P. Fulcher, Z. Chen and K. C. Yeong, Energies of quark-antiquark systems, the Cornell potential, and the spinless Salpeter equation, Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 4122

  4. [4]

    The excited bottom-charmed mesons in a nonrelativistic quark model

    Q. Li et al.,Excited bottom-charmed mesons in a nonrelativistic quark model, Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 096020, arXiv:1903.11927 [hep-ph]

  5. [5]

    G.-L. Wang, T. Wang, Q. Li and C.-H. Chang, The mass spectrum and wave functions of the B𝑐 system, JHEP05(2022) 006, arXiv:2201.02318 [hep-ph]

  6. [6]

    E. B. Gregory et al.,Prediction of the𝐵∗ 𝑐 mass in full lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.104(2010) 022001, arXiv:0909.4462 [hep-lat]

  7. [7]

    R. J. Dowdall et al.,Precise heavy-light meson masses and hyperfine splittings from lattice QCD including charm quarks in the sea, Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 094510, arXiv:1207.5149 [hep-ph]

  8. [8]

    Precise predictions of charmed-bottom hadrons from lattice QCD

    N. Mathur, M. Padmanath and S. Mondal, Precise predictions of charmed-bottom hadrons from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 202002, arXiv:1806.04151 [hep-lat]

  9. [9]

    q\bar q$ bound states in the Bethe-Salpeter formalism

    P. Jain and H. J. Munczek,𝑞¯𝑞bound states in the Bethe-Salpeter formalism, Phys. Rev. D48(1993) 5403, arXiv:hep-ph/9307221

  10. [10]

    E. J. Eichten and C. Quigg,Mesons with Beauty and Charm: Spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 5845, arXiv:hep-ph/9402210

  11. [11]

    J. Zeng, J. W. Van Orden and W. Roberts,Heavy mesons in a relativistic model, Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 5229, arXiv:hep-ph/9412269

  12. [12]

    S. S. Gershtein, V. V. Kiselev, A. K. Likhoded and A. V. Tkabladze,𝐵𝑐 spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. D51(1995) 3613, arXiv:hep-ph/9406339. 10

  13. [13]

    L. P. Fulcher,Phenomenological predictions of the properties of the𝐵𝑐 system, Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 074006, arXiv:hep-ph/9806444

  14. [14]

    A. P. Monteiro, M. Bhat and K. B. Vijaya Kumar, Mass spectra and decays of ground and orbitally excited𝑐¯𝑏states in nonrelativistic quark model, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A32(2017) 1750021, arXiv:1607.07594 [hep-ph]

  15. [15]

    B_{c} meson and the light-heavy quarkonium spectrum

    M. Baldicchi and G. M. Prosperi,𝐵𝑐 meson and the light-heavy quarkonium spectrum, Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 114024, arXiv:hep-ph/0008017

  16. [16]

    Properties of heavy quarkonia and B_c mesons in the relativistic quark model

    D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov and V. O. Galkin, Properties of heavy quarkonia and𝐵𝑐 mesons in the relativistic quark model, Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 014027, arXiv:hep-ph/0210381

  17. [17]

    Spectroscopy of B_c Mesons in the Relativized Quark Model

    S. Godfrey,Spectroscopy of𝐵 𝑐 Mesons in the Relativized Quark Model, Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 054017, arXiv:hep-ph/0406228

  18. [18]

    S. V. Ikhdair and R. Sever,𝐵𝑐 and heavy meson spectroscopy in the local approximation of the Schrodinger equation with relativistic kinematics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A20(2005) 4035, arXiv:hep-ph/0403280

  19. [19]

    Radiative decays of Bc mesons in a Bethe-Salpeter model

    A. Abd El-Hady, J. R. Spence and J. P. Vary, Radiative decays of𝐵𝑐 mesons in a Bethe-Salpeter model, Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 034006, arXiv:hep-ph/0603139

  20. [20]

    Wei and X.-H

    K.-W. Wei and X.-H. Guo,Mass spectra of doubly heavy mesons in Regge phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 076005

  21. [21]

    Spectroscopy and Regge trajectories of heavy quarkonia and B_c mesons

    D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov and V. O. Galkin, Spectroscopy and Regge trajectories of heavy quarkonia and𝐵𝑐 mesons, Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011) 1825, arXiv:1111.0454 [hep-ph]

  22. [22]

    Analysis of the vector and axialvector $B_c$ mesons with QCD sum rules

    Z.-G. Wang,Analysis of the vector and axialvector𝐵𝑐 mesons with QCD sum rules, Eur. Phys. J. A49(2013) 131, arXiv:1203.6252 [hep-ph]

  23. [23]

    A. P. Monteiro, M. Bhat and K. B. V. Kumar, 𝑐 ¯𝑏spectrum and decay properties with coupled channel effects, Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 054016, arXiv:1608.05782 [hep-ph]

  24. [24]

    M. Bhat, A. P. Monteiro and K. B. Vijaya Kumar, Effects of coupled channels on𝑐¯𝑏mass and decays in NRQM with OGEP, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E26(2017) 1750037, arXiv:1703.00701 [hep-ph]

  25. [25]

    N. R. Soni, B. R. Joshi, R. P. Shah, H. R. Chauhan and J. N. Pandya, 𝑄 ¯𝑄(𝑄∈ {𝑏, 𝑐}) spectroscopy using the Cornell potential, Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 592, arXiv:1707.07144 [hep-ph]

  26. [26]

    E. J. Eichten and C. Quigg,Mesons with Beauty and Charm: New Horizons in Spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 054025, arXiv:1902.09735 [hep-ph]

  27. [27]

    M. Chen, L. Chang and Y.-x. Liu, 𝐵𝑐 meson spectrum via Dyson-Schwinger equation and Bethe-Salpeter equation approach, Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 056002, arXiv:2001.00161 [hep-ph]

  28. [28]

    Martín-González, P

    B. Martín-González, P. G. Ortega, D. R. Entem, F. Fernández and J. Segovia, Toward the discovery of novel𝐵𝑐 states: Radiative and hadronic transitions, Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 054009, arXiv:2205.05950 [hep-ph]. 11

  29. [29]

    T.-Y. Li, L. Tang, Z.-Y. Fang, C.-H. Wang and C.-Q. Pang,Higher states of the𝐵𝑐 meson family, Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 034019, arXiv:2204.14258 [hep-ph]

  30. [30]

    Li, Y.-S

    X.-J. Li, Y.-S. Li, F.-L. Wang and X. Liu, Spectroscopic survey of higher-lying states of𝐵𝑐 meson family, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 1080, arXiv:2308.07206 [hep-ph]

  31. [31]

    Hao and R

    W. Hao and R. Zhu, Beauty-charm meson family with coupled channel effects and their strong decays, Chin. Phys. C48(2024) 123101, arXiv:2402.18898 [hep-ph]

  32. [32]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Observation of an Excited𝐵± 𝑐 Meson State with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 212004, arXiv:1407.1032 [hep-ex]

  33. [33]

    CMS Collaboration,Observation of Two Excited𝐵+ 𝑐 States and Measurement of the𝐵+ 𝑐 (2S) Mass in 𝑝 𝑝Collisions at√𝑠=13TeV , Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 132001, arXiv:1902.00571 [hep-ex]

  34. [34]

    LHCb Collaboration,Observation of an excited𝐵+ 𝑐 state, Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 232001, arXiv:1904.00081 [hep-ex]

  35. [35]

    LHCb Collaboration,Observation of Orbitally Excited𝐵+ 𝑐 States, Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 231902, arXiv:2507.02149 [hep-ex]

  36. [36]

    LHCb Collaboration,Study of𝐵 𝑐 (1𝑃) + states in the𝐵+ 𝑐 𝛾mass spectrum, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 112003, arXiv:2507.02142 [hep-ex]

  37. [37]

    ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, JINST3(2008) S08003

  38. [38]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of the ATLAS trigger system in 2015, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 317, arXiv:1611.09661 [hep-ex]

  39. [39]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Software and computing for Run 3 of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 234, arXiv:2404.06335 [hep-ex], Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 907

  40. [40]

    ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS data quality operations and performance for 2015–2018 data-taking, JINST15(2020) P04003, arXiv:1911.04632 [physics.ins-det]

  41. [41]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of the ATLAS muon triggers in Run 2, JINST15(2020) P09015, arXiv:2004.13447 [physics.ins-det]

  42. [42]

    BCVEGPY2.2: A Newly Upgraded Version for Hadronic Production of the Meson $B_c$ and Its Excited States

    C.-H. Chang, X.-Y. Wang and X.-G. Wu,BCVEGPY2.2: A newly upgraded version for hadronic production of the meson𝐵𝑐 and its excited states, Comput. Phys. Commun.197(2015) 335, arXiv:1507.05176 [hep-ph]

  43. [43]

    An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

    T. Sjöstrand et al.,An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 159, arXiv:1410.3012 [hep-ph]

  44. [44]

    D. J. Lange,The EvtGen particle decay simulation package, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A462(2001) 152

  45. [45]

    Agostinelli et al.,Geant4– a simulation toolkit, Nucl

    S. Agostinelli et al.,Geant4– a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506(2003) 250

  46. [46]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Muon reconstruction and identification efficiency in ATLAS using the full Run 2𝑝 𝑝collision data set at√𝑠=13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 578, arXiv:2012.00578 [hep-ex]. 12

  47. [47]

    Kostyukhin,VKalVrt - package for vertex reconstruction in ATLAS, ATL-PHYS-2003-031, 2003, url:http://cds.cern.ch/record/685551

    V. Kostyukhin,VKalVrt - package for vertex reconstruction in ATLAS, ATL-PHYS-2003-031, 2003, url:http://cds.cern.ch/record/685551

  48. [48]

    Navas et al.,Review of particle physics, Phys

    Particle Data Group, S. Navas et al.,Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001

  49. [49]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Reconstruction of primary vertices at the ATLAS experiment in Run 1 proton–proton collisions at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 332, arXiv:1611.10235 [physics.ins-det]

  50. [50]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Vertex Reconstruction Performance of the ATLAS Detector at√𝑠=13TeV , ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-026, 2015,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2037717

  51. [51]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS track reconstruction algorithms in dense environments in LHC Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 673, arXiv:1704.07983 [hep-ex]

  52. [52]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Track and Vertex Reconstruction with the ATLAS Inner Detector, (2026), arXiv:2605.07585 [hep-ex]

  53. [53]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Charged-particle distributions at low transverse momentum in√𝑠=13TeV 𝑝 𝑝interactions measured with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 502, arXiv:1606.01133 [hep-ex]

  54. [54]

    Kernel Estimation in High-Energy Physics

    K. Cranmer,Kernel estimation in high-energy physics, Comput. Phys. Commun.136(2001) 198, arXiv:hep-ex/0011057 [hep-ex]

  55. [55]

    Measurement of inelastic J/psi production in deep inelastic scattering at HERA

    ZEUS Collaboration, S. Chekanov et al., Measurement of inelastic𝐽/𝜓production in deep inelastic scattering at HERA, Eur. Phys. J. C44(2005) 13, arXiv:hep-ex/0505008 [hep-ex]

  56. [56]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the𝑏-hadron production cross section using decays to 𝐷∗+𝜇− 𝑋final states in𝑝 𝑝collisions at √𝑠=7TeV with the ATLAS detector, Nucl. Phys. B864(2012) 341, arXiv:1206.3122 [hep-ex]

  57. [57]

    Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics

    G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross and O. Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011) 1554, arXiv:1007.1727 [physics.data-an], Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C73(2013) 2501

  58. [58]

    Trial factors for the look elsewhere effect in high energy physics

    E. Gross and O. Vitells,Trial factors for the look elsewhere effect in high energy physics, Eur. Phys. J. C70(2010) 525, arXiv:1005.1891 [physics.data-an]

  59. [59]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Study of the material of the ATLAS inner detector for Run 2 of the LHC, JINST12(2017) P12009, arXiv:1707.02826 [hep-ex]

  60. [60]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Study of𝐵 + 𝑐 →𝐽/𝜓𝐷 + 𝑠 and𝐵 + 𝑐 →𝐽/𝜓𝐷 ∗+ 𝑠 decays in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP08(2022) 087, arXiv:2203.01808 [hep-ex]

  61. [61]

    V. V. Kiselev and A. Tkabladze,Semileptonic𝐵𝑐 decays from QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D48(1993) 5208

  62. [62]

    V. V. Kiselev, A. K. Likhoded and A. I. Onishchenko, Semileptonic𝐵 𝑐 meson decays in sum rules of QCD and NRQCD, Nucl. Phys. B569(2000) 473, arXiv:hep-ph/9905359 [hep-ph]

  63. [63]

    V. V. Kiselev,Exclusive decays and lifetime of𝐵𝑐 meson in QCD sum rules, 2003, arXiv:hep-ph/0211021 [hep-ph]. 13

  64. [64]

    Weak decays of the B_c meson to charmonium and D mesons in the relativistic quark model

    D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov and V. O. Galkin, Weak decays of the𝐵𝑐 meson to charmonium and𝐷mesons in the relativistic quark model, Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 094020, arXiv:hep-ph/0306306 [hep-ph]

  65. [65]

    Semileptonic Meson Decays in the Quark Model: An Update

    D. Scora and N. Isgur,Semileptonic meson decays in the quark model: An update, Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 2783, arXiv:hep-ph/9503486 [hep-ph]

  66. [66]

    Demokritos

    ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS Computing Acknowledgements, ATL-SOFT-PUB-2026-001, 2026, url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2952666. 14 The ATLAS Collaboration G. Aad 103, E. Aakvaag 17, B. Abbott 122, S. Abdelhameed 84b, K. Abeling 55, N.J. Abicht 49, S.H. Abidi 30, M. Aboelela 45, A. Aboulhorma 36e, H. Abramowicz 155, B.S. Acharya 69a,69b,m, A.Ackermann 63a, J.Ac...