pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.16592 · v1 · pith:QZJXUIWEnew · submitted 2026-05-15 · 🌀 gr-qc

Quantum corrections to cosmic perturbations for a bouncing background

H\'ector Hern\'andez Hern\'andez , Hugo Morales T\'ecotl , Gustavo S\'anchez Herrera This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 15:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords quantum correctionsloop quantum cosmologybouncing backgroundcosmic perturbationspower spectrumspectral indexquantum moments
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum corrections to bouncing cosmology perturbations are suppressed by the sixth power of the Planck length.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes second-order quantum corrections to a single scalar perturbation mode coupled to a bouncing background in loop quantum cosmology. Using an effective approach with quantum moments as additional degrees of freedom and holonomy corrections for the bounce, it derives a correction to the curvature power spectrum. The leading term is proportional to (k times Planck length) to the sixth, which is tiny for observable modes. This keeps the model consistent with current cosmic microwave background observations while revealing damping effects from quantum moments.

Core claim

Treating the bounce as a perturbation to the de Sitter solution, the leading correction to the dimensionless curvature power spectrum is δP_R proportional to (k ℓ_Pl)^6. This produces a modification to the spectral index of order 6(k ℓ_Pl)^6 which is much less than one for all cosmologically relevant wavenumbers.

What carries the argument

Second-order quantum moments in the effective equations of motion for the Mukhanov-Sasaki variable, with the bounce incorporated via holonomy corrections in the μ0 scheme.

Load-bearing premise

The bounce can be modeled as a small perturbation to the de Sitter background and the second-order quantum moment truncation suffices even near the bounce and in the ultraviolet.

What would settle it

Numerical solution of the full coupled quantum moment equations without approximating the bounce as a de Sitter perturbation, if it produces a correction to the power spectrum not scaling as (k ℓ_Pl)^6.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.16592 by Gustavo S\'anchez Herrera, H\'ector Hern\'andez Hern\'andez, Hugo Morales T\'ecotl.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: shows the real and imaginary parts of two scalar modes, k = 0.6 and k = 3, passing through the bounce for different values of the gravitational dispersion σ at fixed scalar dispersion χ. The evolution naturally separates into three phases: contraction, bounce, and expansion. 1. Contraction phase: ϕ ≲ 0 During contraction the mode oscillates with effective frequency W2 = k 2 − Ueff given by (41), with k 2 d… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows the pure-bounce case (no quantum moments). The spectrum exhibits large amplitudes, pronounced oscillatory behavior, and a strong growth toward the ultraviolet (k > 3). Modes with small wavenumber (k < 3), corresponding to long wavelengths, are only mildly affected by the bounce, while short￾wavelength modes are substantially amplified. The ul￾traviolet growth is a direct consequence of the bounce dyn… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Time evolution of the power spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: shows PR(k, χ) for fixed σ = 0.4. The surface displays a clear peak at kpeak ≈ 9–11 whose amplitude grows as χ decreases, and a clean ultraviolet suppression for k ≳ 12. FIG. 6: Power spectrum PR(k, χ) at ϕ = 2 within Level 2, for fixed σ = 0.4 and U = 0. The surface displays a clear peak at kpeak ≈ 9– 11 whose amplitude grows as χ decreases. The ultraviolet sector (k ≳ 12) is strongly suppressed, confirmi… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Power spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: shows PR(σ, χ) for fixed k = 10 and k = 11.5, wavenumbers within the regularized ultraviolet sec￾tor. Both surfaces decrease toward the strong quantum regime. The surfaces decrease monotonically with σ and grow with 1/χ, confirming that σ controls the suppres￾sion and χ the overall amplitude. FIG. 7: Power spectrum PR(σ, χ) at ϕ = 2 within Level 2, for fixed k = 9, k = 11.5, and U = 0. The amplitude decrea… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Comparison of the power spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: shows one-dimensional cuts of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We compute second-order quantum corrections, as quantum dispersions and correlations, to a cosmological model coupling a single scalar perturbation mode to a bouncing background within Loop Quantum Cosmology (LQC). Using an effective quantization approach in which quantum moments extend the classical phase space as new dynamical degrees of freedom, and incorporating the cosmic bounce through holonomy corrections in the $\mu_0$ scheme, we derive a coupled set of effective equations of motion for the expectation values and second-order quantum moments of both the gravitational and scalar sectors evolving with respect to a clock scalar field. Within the test-field approximation and for a vanishing scalar potential, the quantum moment equations reduce to a third-order ordinary differential equation for the mean squared deviation $G^{vv}$ of the Mukhanov-Sasaki variable in a de Sitter background with LQC bounce. Treating the effect of bounce as a perturbation of the solution, we construct the corresponding correction to the dimensionless curvature power spectrum. The leading correction is suppressed by the sixth power of the Planck length, producing a scale-dependent enhancement $\delta P_{R} \propto (k \ell_{\rm Pl})^6$ that modifies the spectral index by $\delta n_s \sim 6(k \ell_{\rm Pl})^6 \ll 1$ for all cosmologically observable modes, in full consistency with current observational constraints. Numerical evolution of the full coupled system reveals a conditional ultraviolet regularization of the bounce-induced spectrum: the gravitational quantum moments generate a damping mechanism that suppresses the scalar perturbation amplitude after the bounce. Including cross-sector quantum correlations amplifies perturbation modes and introduces numerical instabilities at high wavenumbers, signaling the limits of the second-order truncation in the ultraviolet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes second-order quantum corrections (dispersions and correlations) to scalar perturbations in a single-mode LQC bouncing cosmology. Using effective moment equations with holonomy corrections in the μ0 scheme, the system reduces under test-field and vanishing-potential approximations to a third-order ODE for the mean-squared deviation G^{vv} of the Mukhanov-Sasaki variable on a de Sitter background. The bounce is treated as a perturbation to this solution, yielding a leading correction δP_R ∝ (k ℓ_Pl)^6 to the curvature power spectrum that shifts the spectral index by an amount ≪1 for observable modes. Numerical integration of the coupled moment system shows post-bounce damping from gravitational moments but instabilities at high k when cross-correlations are retained, interpreted as a limit of the second-order truncation.

Significance. If the perturbative construction around de Sitter and the second-order truncation remain valid, the result supplies a concrete, scale-dependent estimate of LQC quantum corrections to the power spectrum that is parametrically smaller than current observational bounds. The work also illustrates how quantum moments can induce a damping mechanism after the bounce. The extreme suppression, however, implies limited immediate phenomenological consequences unless the framework is extended to other observables or to non-perturbative regimes.

major comments (2)
  1. [the perturbative construction of the correction to the dimensionless curvature power spectrum] The central construction treats the LQC bounce as a perturbation to the de Sitter solution of the third-order ODE for G^{vv}. Because the μ0 holonomy corrections become O(1) when the curvature reaches Planckian values at the bounce, the background scale factor and Hubble parameter deviate non-perturbatively from de Sitter. This raises the possibility that the leading correction to P_R is not captured by the perturbative expansion and may contain terms with weaker k-suppression than (k ℓ_Pl)^6. A direct non-perturbative integration of the moment equations through the bounce or an explicit error estimate for the perturbative step is needed to substantiate the claimed suppression.
  2. [the discussion of numerical evolution of the full coupled system] Numerical evolution of the full coupled system is reported to exhibit instabilities at high wavenumbers once cross-sector quantum correlations are included. These instabilities are interpreted as signaling the limits of the second-order truncation, yet the same truncation is used to derive the analytic (k ℓ_Pl)^6 correction. The presence of uncontrolled errors in the ultraviolet regime undermines in the damping mechanism and in the overall perturbative result for modes that may still be relevant near the bounce.
minor comments (1)
  1. [reduction to the third-order ODE] The abstract states that the quantum moment equations reduce to a third-order ODE under the test-field approximation and vanishing scalar potential; the manuscript should explicitly verify that these approximations remain consistent with the inclusion of second-order moments throughout the bounce.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below with point-by-point responses, proposing targeted revisions where appropriate to clarify the scope and validity of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [the perturbative construction of the correction to the dimensionless curvature power spectrum] The central construction treats the LQC bounce as a perturbation to the de Sitter solution of the third-order ODE for G^{vv}. Because the μ0 holonomy corrections become O(1) when the curvature reaches Planckian values at the bounce, the background scale factor and Hubble parameter deviate non-perturbatively from de Sitter. This raises the possibility that the leading correction to P_R is not captured by the perturbative expansion and may contain terms with weaker k-suppression than (k ℓ_Pl)^6. A direct non-perturbative integration of the moment equations through the bounce or an explicit error estimate for the perturbative step is needed to substantiate the claimed suppression.

    Authors: We acknowledge that holonomy corrections render the background evolution non-perturbative near the bounce, where the scale factor and Hubble parameter depart significantly from de Sitter. Our derivation obtains the third-order ODE under a de Sitter background approximation valid far from the bounce, where observable modes evolve, and then incorporates the bounce as a perturbation to the solution for G^{vv}. To address the concern, we will add an explicit error estimate quantifying the background deviation from de Sitter and its effect on the moment equations, along with a discussion of the perturbative parameter's magnitude for cosmologically relevant k. While a complete non-perturbative integration lies beyond the present scope, these additions will better justify the (k ℓ_Pl)^6 suppression. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [the discussion of numerical evolution of the full coupled system] Numerical evolution of the full coupled system is reported to exhibit instabilities at high wavenumbers once cross-sector quantum correlations are included. These instabilities are interpreted as signaling the limits of the second-order truncation, yet the same truncation is used to derive the analytic (k ℓ_Pl)^6 correction. The presence of uncontrolled errors in the ultraviolet regime undermines confidence in the damping mechanism and in the overall perturbative result for modes that may still be relevant near the bounce.

    Authors: The numerical instabilities at high k upon including cross-correlations correctly signal the breakdown of the second-order truncation in the ultraviolet. The analytic δP_R ∝ (k ℓ_Pl)^6 result is obtained strictly within the test-field approximation that excludes these cross-sector correlations, for which the evolution remains stable. The post-bounce damping arises from gravitational moments in this controlled truncation. We will revise the manuscript to delineate the validity regime more explicitly, noting that the perturbative correction applies to low-k observable modes and that high-k instabilities underscore the truncation's limits without affecting the reported damping for the relevant sector. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation proceeds from effective moment equations to perturbative correction without reduction to inputs

full rationale

The paper starts from the effective quantization of LQC with holonomy corrections in the μ0 scheme and extends the phase space with second-order quantum moments. It then reduces the moment equations under the test-field approximation and vanishing potential to a third-order ODE for G^{vv} on a de Sitter background that incorporates the bounce. The bounce is treated as a small perturbation to the de Sitter solution, yielding the explicit correction δP_R ∝ (k ℓ_Pl)^6 after integration. This chain is a direct computation from the derived ODE and does not equate the final result to any fitted parameter or prior self-citation by construction. Numerical evolution of the coupled system supplies an independent consistency check, confirming the analytic suppression for observable modes.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the effective quantization framework of LQC, the μ0 holonomy scheme, the test-field approximation, and the truncation to second-order moments; these are standard domain assumptions rather than new postulates.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Holonomy corrections in the μ0 scheme incorporate the cosmic bounce
    Invoked to replace the classical singularity with a bounce in the background dynamics.
  • domain assumption Test-field approximation for the scalar perturbation mode
    Used to decouple the perturbation from backreaction on the background.
  • ad hoc to paper Second-order truncation of the quantum moment hierarchy
    Limits the expansion to second moments, enabling closure of the equations but introducing the noted ultraviolet instabilities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5843 in / 1609 out tokens · 81655 ms · 2026-05-20T15:53:46.832559+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Note thatF andf(defined in Eq

    Simplified effective modev k dynamics Writing (46) in cosmic time gives ¨vk − ˙F F ˙vk +F 2ω2vk = 0 (49) where the rescaled functionFis F:=− r 2 3 ip ∆J ,(50) and the scalar mode evolves with the time-dependent ef- fective frequencyω 2(t) =k 2 −z ′′/z, wherez ′′/zencodes the coupling to the background geometry. Note thatF andf(defined in Eq. (48)) are rel...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Simplified quantum moments dynamics Combining the three equations in (47), the mean squared dispersionG vv satisfies the third-order ordinary differential equation ... G vv −3 ˙F F ¨Gvv +  4F2ω2 − ¨F F + 3 ˙F F !2  ˙Gvv +4F2ω˙ωGvv = 0.(54) Introducing the conformal variableξ=−kηand writ- ing (54) in conformal time yields k3Gvv ,ξξξ −3k 3 (aF) ,ξ aF Gv...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Classical limit:F=−1/a The physical meaning of the conditionF=−1/a becomes clear when theµ-dependence suppressed in Section III is restored. Writing ∆J=J− ¯J= (2ip/µ) sin(µc) and substituting into (50), we obtain F=− r 2 3 ip ∆J =− r 2 3 µ 2 sin(µc).(58) In the low-curvature limitµc→0 (equivalently,|c| ≪ µ−1), sin(µc)∼µc, F=− 1√ 6 1 c .(59) In the de Sitt...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Sincep=a 2, consistency with the back- ground solution (45) requiresp 0 =α= 10

    Gravitational sector The gravitational background variables must satisfy initial conditions that guarantee the existence of a cos- mic bounce with a finite, nonvanishing minimum value of the scale factor. Sincep=a 2, consistency with the back- ground solution (45) requiresp 0 =α= 10. This choice partially fixes the non-canonical variablesJ=pe ic and A Ini...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Matter sector For the scalar mode we impose the Bunch–Davies vac- uum as initial condition. This choice has a physical mo- tivation: at very early times, close to the bounce and at the onset of inflation, the perturbation modes are deep inside the Hubble horizon (k≫aH) and spacetime is approximately flat. The standard Bunch–Davies initial conditions are [...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Quantum moments For the second-order quantum moments we employ the Gaussian state (30), which is a minimum-uncertainty state and represents the closest quantum analogue to a classical configuration while still encoding nontrivial quantum fluctuations. More general, non-Gaussian ini- tial states are in principle possible; however, the Gaus- sian choice is ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    The coupling between the mode and the scale factor results in a pro- gressively increasing oscillation frequency asϕbecomes more negative

    Contraction phase:ϕ≲0 During contraction the mode oscillates with effective frequencyW 2 =k 2 −U eff given by (41), withk 2 dom- inating overU eff for sub-horizon modes. The coupling between the mode and the scale factor results in a pro- gressively increasing oscillation frequency asϕbecomes more negative. Modes with larger wavenumberkoscil- late more ra...

    work page

  8. [8]

    The mode oscillation therefore slows and the perturbation amplitude reaches a local minimum when crossing the bounce

    Bounce phase:0≲ϕ≲2 As the Universe contracts toward the bounce, the scale factor reaches its minimum atϕ≈1 and the effective fre- quencyW 2 is significantly reduced. The mode oscillation therefore slows and the perturbation amplitude reaches a local minimum when crossing the bounce. Once the bounce occurs and expansion begins, the modes resume oscillating...

    work page

  9. [9]

    Expansion phase:ϕ≳2 During the expansion phase, the interplay between the bounce dynamics and the gravitational quantum moments determines the evolution of the perturbation amplitude. The effective friction coefficientDin (41), sourced by the gravitational quantum momentsg 1 ∼ GJJ andg − 2 ∼G J ¯J, competes with the bounce-induced amplification that acts ...

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Theory of cosmological perturbations.Physics reports, 215(5-6):203–333, 1992

    Viatcheslav F Mukhanov, Hume A Feldman, and Robert Hans Brandenberger. Theory of cosmological perturbations.Physics reports, 215(5-6):203–333, 1992

    work page 1992

  11. [11]

    Perturbations of a cosmological model and angular variations of the mi- crowave background.Astrophysical Journal, vol

    Rainer K Sachs and Arthur M Wolfe. Perturbations of a cosmological model and angular variations of the mi- crowave background.Astrophysical Journal, vol. 147, p. 73, 147:73, 1967

    work page 1967

  12. [12]

    Primeval adiabatic pertur- bation in an expanding universe.Astrophysical Journal, vol

    Philip JE Peebles and JT Yu. Primeval adiabatic pertur- bation in an expanding universe.Astrophysical Journal, vol. 162, p. 815, 162:815, 1970

    work page 1970

  13. [13]

    Quantum fluctuations and a nonsingular universe.ZhETF Pisma Redaktsiiu, 33:549–553, 1981

    Viatcheslav F Mukhanov and GV Chibisov. Quantum fluctuations and a nonsingular universe.ZhETF Pisma Redaktsiiu, 33:549–553, 1981

    work page 1981

  14. [14]

    Structure in the cobe differential microwave radiometer first-year maps.Astrophysical Journal, Part 2-Letters (ISSN 0004-637X), vol

    George F Smoot, Charles L Bennett, Alan Kogut, Ed- ward L Wright, Jon Aymon, Nancy W Boggess, Ed- ward S Cheng, G De Amici, S Gulkis, MG Hauser, et al. Structure in the cobe differential microwave radiometer first-year maps.Astrophysical Journal, Part 2-Letters (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 396, no. 1, Sept. 1, 1992, p. L1- L5. Research supported by NASA., 396:L...

    work page 1992

  15. [15]

    First-year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (wmap)* observations: determination of cosmological parameters.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Se- ries, 148(1):175, 2003

    David N Spergel, Licia Verde, Hiranya V Peiris, Ei- ichiro Komatsu, MR Nolta, Charles L Bennett, Mark Halpern, Gary Hinshaw, Norman Jarosik, Alan Kogut, et al. First-year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (wmap)* observations: determination of cosmological parameters.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Se- ries, 148(1):175, 2003

    work page 2003

  16. [16]

    Planck 2013 re- sults

    Peter AR Ade, Nabila Aghanim, Charmaine Armitage- Caplan, Mark Arnaud, Mark Ashdown, F Atrio- Barandela, Jonathan Aumont, Carlo Baccigalupi, An- thony J Banday, RB Barreiro, et al. Planck 2013 re- sults. xvi. cosmological parameters.Astronomy & As- trophysics, 571:A16, 2014

    work page 2013

  17. [17]

    The three-dimensional power spec- trum of galaxies from the sloan digital sky survey.The Astrophysical Journal, 606(2):702, 2004

    Max Tegmark, Michael R Blanton, Michael A Strauss, Fiona Hoyle, David Schlegel, Roman Scoccimarro, Michael S Vogeley, David H Weinberg, Idit Zehavi, An- dreas Berlind, et al. The three-dimensional power spec- trum of galaxies from the sloan digital sky survey.The Astrophysical Journal, 606(2):702, 2004

    work page 2004

  18. [18]

    Detection of the baryon acoustic peak in the large- scale correlation function of sdss luminous red galaxies

    Daniel J Eisenstein, Idit Zehavi, David W Hogg, Roman Scoccimarro, Michael R Blanton, Robert C Nichol, Ryan Scranton, Hee-Jong Seo, Max Tegmark, Zheng Zheng, et al. Detection of the baryon acoustic peak in the large- scale correlation function of sdss luminous red galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal, 633(2):560, 2005

    work page 2005

  19. [19]

    Gauge-invariant cosmological pertur- bations.Physical Review D, 22(8):1882, 1980

    James M Bardeen. Gauge-invariant cosmological pertur- bations.Physical Review D, 22(8):1882, 1980

    work page 1980

  20. [20]

    Absence of a singularity in loop quan- tum cosmology.Physical Review Letters, 86(23):5227, 2001

    Martin Bojowald. Absence of a singularity in loop quan- tum cosmology.Physical Review Letters, 86(23):5227, 2001

    work page 2001

  21. [21]

    Dynamical initial conditions in quan- tum cosmology.Physical Review Letters, 87(12):121301, 2001

    Martin Bojowald. Dynamical initial conditions in quan- tum cosmology.Physical Review Letters, 87(12):121301, 2001

    work page 2001

  22. [22]

    Isotropic loop quantum cosmology

    Martin Bojowald. Isotropic loop quantum cosmology. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 19(10):2717, 2002

    work page 2002

  23. [23]

    Quantum nature of the big bang.Physical review letters, 96(14):141301, 2006

    Abhay Ashtekar, Tomasz Pawlowski, and Parampreet Singh. Quantum nature of the big bang.Physical review letters, 96(14):141301, 2006

    work page 2006

  24. [24]

    Effective equations for isotropic quan- tum cosmology including matter.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 76(6):063511, 2007

    Martin Bojowald, Hector Hern´ andez, and Aureliano Skirzewski. Effective equations for isotropic quan- tum cosmology including matter.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 76(6):063511, 2007

    work page 2007

  25. [25]

    Singularity removal in a quantum effective evo- lution of the mixmaster cosmological model.Physical Review D, 110(4):043506, 2024

    Hector Hernandez-Hernandez and Gustavo Sanchez- Herrera. Singularity removal in a quantum effective evo- lution of the mixmaster cosmological model.Physical Review D, 110(4):043506, 2024

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Effective equations of motion for quantum systems.Reviews in Mathematical Physics, 18(07):713–745, 2006

    Martin Bojowald and Aureliano Skirzewski. Effective equations of motion for quantum systems.Reviews in Mathematical Physics, 18(07):713–745, 2006

    work page 2006

  27. [27]

    Quantum cosmology: effective theory

    Martin Bojowald. Quantum cosmology: effective theory. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 29(21):213001, 2012

    work page 2012

  28. [28]

    Effective description of the quantum damped harmonic oscillator: revisiting the bateman dual system.Physica Scripta, 100(3):035115, 2025

    CR Javier Valdez, H Hernandez-Hernandez, and Guillermo Chac´ on-Acosta. Effective description of the quantum damped harmonic oscillator: revisiting the bateman dual system.Physica Scripta, 100(3):035115, 2025

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    Semiclassical trajectories in the double-slit ex- periment.Physica Scripta, 98(2):025215, 2023

    Hector H Hernandez Hernandez and Carlos R Javier Valdez. Semiclassical trajectories in the double-slit ex- periment.Physica Scripta, 98(2):025215, 2023

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Chaotic behavior of the bianchi ix model under the influence of quantum effects.Physical Review D, 109(4):044038, 2024

    Martin Bojowald, David Brizuela, Paula Calizaya Cabr- era, and Sara F Uria. Chaotic behavior of the bianchi ix model under the influence of quantum effects.Physical Review D, 109(4):044038, 2024

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    A moment ap- proach to compute quantum-gravity effects in the pri- mordial universe.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparti- cle Physics, 2019(04):016, 2019

    David Brizuela and Unai Muniain. A moment ap- proach to compute quantum-gravity effects in the pri- mordial universe.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparti- cle Physics, 2019(04):016, 2019

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    Canonical description of cosmological backreaction.Journal of Cosmology and 21 Astroparticle Physics, 2021(03):083, 2021

    Martin Bojowald and Ding Ding. Canonical description of cosmological backreaction.Journal of Cosmology and 21 Astroparticle Physics, 2021(03):083, 2021

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Gauge invariant cosmo- logical perturbation equations with corrections from loop quantum gravity.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 79(4):043505, 2009

    Martin Bojowald, Golam Mortuza Hossain, Mikhail Ka- gan, and S Shankaranarayanan. Gauge invariant cosmo- logical perturbation equations with corrections from loop quantum gravity.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 79(4):043505, 2009

    work page 2009

  34. [34]

    Ex- tension of the quantum theory of cosmological perturba- tions to the planck era.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 87(4):043507, 2013

    Ivan Agullo, Abhay Ashtekar, and William Nelson. Ex- tension of the quantum theory of cosmological perturba- tions to the planck era.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 87(4):043507, 2013

    work page 2013

  35. [35]

    Quantum gravity extension of the inflationary scenario

    Ivan Agullo, Abhay Ashtekar, and William Nelson. Quantum gravity extension of the inflationary scenario. Physical review letters, 109(25):251301, 2012

    work page 2012

  36. [36]

    The pre-inflationary dynamics of loop quantum cosmology: Confronting quantum gravity with observations.Classi- cal and Quantum Gravity, 30(8):085014, 2013

    Ivan Agullo, Abhay Ashtekar, and William Nelson. The pre-inflationary dynamics of loop quantum cosmology: Confronting quantum gravity with observations.Classi- cal and Quantum Gravity, 30(8):085014, 2013

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    Cos- mic tango between the very small and the very large: Addressing cmb anomalies through loop quantum cos- mology.Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 8:685288, 2021

    Abhay Ashtekar, Brajesh Gupt, and V Sreenath. Cos- mic tango between the very small and the very large: Addressing cmb anomalies through loop quantum cos- mology.Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 8:685288, 2021

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    Primodial power spectrum in loop quantum cosmology for different regularizations.Physi- cal Review D, 111(12):126013, 2025

    Maciej Kowalczyk, Guillermo A Mena Marug´ an, and Tomasz Paw lowski. Primodial power spectrum in loop quantum cosmology for different regularizations.Physi- cal Review D, 111(12):126013, 2025

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Quasiclassical model of inhomogeneous cosmology.Classical and Quan- tum Gravity, 40(15):155012, 2023

    Martin Bojowald and Freddy Hancock. Quasiclassical model of inhomogeneous cosmology.Classical and Quan- tum Gravity, 40(15):155012, 2023

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Constraining the bispectrum from bouncing cosmologies with planck.Physical Review Letters, 130(19):191002, 2023

    Bartjan van Tent, Paola CM Delgado, and Ruth Durrer. Constraining the bispectrum from bouncing cosmologies with planck.Physical Review Letters, 130(19):191002, 2023

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    Cambridge University Press, 2022

    Daniel Baumann.Cosmology. Cambridge University Press, 2022

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Scalar and vector perturbations in quantum cosmological back- grounds.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravita- tion, and Cosmology, 76(2):023506, 2007

    Emanuel JC Pinho and Nelson Pinto-Neto. Scalar and vector perturbations in quantum cosmological back- grounds.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravita- tion, and Cosmology, 76(2):023506, 2007

    work page 2007

  43. [43]

    Large scale effective theory for cosmo- logical bounces.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 75(8):081301, 2007

    Martin Bojowald. Large scale effective theory for cosmo- logical bounces.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 75(8):081301, 2007

    work page 2007

  44. [44]

    New variables for classical and quan- tum gravity.Physical review letters, 57(18):2244, 1986

    Abhay Ashtekar. New variables for classical and quan- tum gravity.Physical review letters, 57(18):2244, 1986

    work page 1986

  45. [45]

    Cambridge University Press, 2010

    Martin Bojowald.Canonical gravity and applications: cosmology, black holes, and quantum gravity. Cambridge University Press, 2010

    work page 2010

  46. [46]

    Loop quantum cosmology: I

    Martin Bojowald. Loop quantum cosmology: I. kinemat- ics.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 17(6):1489, 2000

    work page 2000

  47. [47]

    Mathematical structure of loop quantum cosmology

    Abhay Ashtekar, Martin Bojowald, and Jerzy Lewandowski. Mathematical structure of loop quantum cosmology. 2003

    work page 2003

  48. [48]

    High- order quantum back-reaction and quantum cosmology with a positive cosmological constant.Physical Re- view D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 84(4):043514, 2011

    Martin Bojowald, David Brizuela, Hector H Hern´ andez, Michael J Koop, and Hugo A Morales-T´ ecotl. High- order quantum back-reaction and quantum cosmology with a positive cosmological constant.Physical Re- view D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 84(4):043514, 2011

    work page 2011

  49. [49]

    Cambridge university press, 2005

    Viatcheslav Mukhanov.Physical foundations of cosmol- ogy. Cambridge university press, 2005

    work page 2005

  50. [50]

    TASI Lectures on Inflation

    Daniel Baumann. Tasi lectures on inflation.arXiv preprint arXiv:0907.5424, 2009

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  51. [51]

    Quantum Backreaction in Effective Brans-Dicke Bianchi I Cosmology

    Hector Hugo Hernandez Hernandez and Gustavo Ale- jandro Sanchez Herrera. Quantum backreaction in ef- fective brans-dicke bianchi i cosmology.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.12207, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    Small-scale cosmologi- cal perturbations: an analytic approach.The Astrophys- ical Journal, 471(2):542, 1996

    Wayne Hu and Naoshi Sugiyama. Small-scale cosmologi- cal perturbations: an analytic approach.The Astrophys- ical Journal, 471(2):542, 1996

    work page 1996

  53. [53]

    Aghanim et al

    N. Aghanim et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. cosmological parameters.Astron. Astrophys., 641:A6, 2020

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    Large scale anomalies in the cmb and non-gaussianity in bouncing cosmologies.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 38(6):065010, 2021

    Ivan Agullo, Dimitrios Kranas, and V Sreenath. Large scale anomalies in the cmb and non-gaussianity in bouncing cosmologies.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 38(6):065010, 2021

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    Cmb anomalies after planck.Clas- sical and Quantum Gravity, 33(18):184001, 2016

    Dominik J Schwarz, Craig J Copi, Dragan Huterer, and Glenn D Starkman. Cmb anomalies after planck.Clas- sical and Quantum Gravity, 33(18):184001, 2016

    work page 2016

  56. [56]

    Missing large-angle correlations versus even-odd point-parity imbalance in the cosmic microwave background.Astronomy & Astrophysics, 660:A121, 2022

    M-A Sanchis-Lozano, F Melia, M L´ opez-Corredoira, and N Sanchis-Gual. Missing large-angle correlations versus even-odd point-parity imbalance in the cosmic microwave background.Astronomy & Astrophysics, 660:A121, 2022

    work page 2022