New Source of Spin-hot spot in displaced silicon double quantum dots

arxiv: 2605.16947 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-16 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

New Source of Spin-hot spot in displaced silicon double quantum dots

Sanjay Prabhakar This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 19:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

keywords silicon quantum dotsdouble quantum dotsspin relaxationspin hot spotsacoustic phononsmagnetic confinementqubit coherence

0 comments p. Extension

The pith

Displaced silicon double quantum dots produce a new low-field spin-hot spot with spin relaxation rates four orders of magnitude lower than conventional high-field spots.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper analyzes spin relaxation from acoustic phonon deformation potentials in single and double silicon quantum dots under in-plane and out-of-plane magnetic fields. Single dots show familiar hot spots from singlet-triplet level crossings, with rates sensitive to low fields but converging at higher fields. When the dots are displaced and separated, a new hot spot appears at low in-plane fields below 1 T. At a separation of about 60 nm the hot spot locations oscillate with magnetic field strength, yielding relaxation rates roughly four orders smaller than the usual high-field spot near 4.5 T. This extremely low relaxation supports longer-lived superposition states for spin qubits.

Core claim

In a model of two displaced, magnetically confined quantum dots the deformation-potential coupling to acoustic phonons generates two distinct spin-hot spots at different in-plane field strengths, with relaxation times spanning milliseconds to picoseconds. For dot separations near 60 nm the positions of these hot spots oscillate as the field varies, creating an unusual low-field hot spot whose relaxation rate is three to four orders of magnitude smaller than the conventional high-field hot spot at approximately 4.5 T.

What carries the argument

The model of two displaced, magnetically confined quantum dots whose singlet-triplet level crossings are induced by deformation-potential coupling to acoustic phonons.

If this is right

Spin relaxation times can be tuned from milliseconds to picoseconds by changing the in-plane field at fixed dot separation.
The low relaxation rate at the new hot spot enables preparation of qubit superposition states.
Oscillations in hot-spot position with field provide a way to select operating points of high spin stability.
Quantum devices may function at lower magnetic fields while still achieving long coherence times.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Dot separation could be engineered as a design parameter to place the low-relaxation regime at a target operating field.
The same displacement-induced oscillations might appear in other host materials and offer an additional control handle for spin coherence.
If the low-field hot spot survives in real devices, it could reduce the magnet strength needed for spin-qubit arrays.

Load-bearing premise

The dominant relaxation channel is deformation-potential coupling to acoustic phonons and the two-displaced-dot model captures every relevant level crossing without extra mechanisms such as interface roughness or charge noise.

What would settle it

Measure the spin relaxation rate versus in-plane magnetic field for double dots separated by 60 nm and test whether relaxation shows the predicted oscillations and a minimum four orders lower than the high-field value near 4.5 T.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.16947 by Sanjay Prabhakar.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. (Color online) Spin-relaxation rate versus inter-dot distances between double quantum dot is shown in (a). Spin-hot [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. (Color online) (a) Spin-relaxation rate versus amplitude of in-plane magentic field in a double quantum dots separated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. (Color online) (a) Spin-relaxation rate versus amplitude of in-plane magnetic field in a double quantum dots separated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Controlling electron spins in double quantum dots allows individual electrons to be trapped and manipulated for next-generation solid-state qubit devices. In this paper, the study analyzes spin relaxation due to deformation potentials of acoustic phonon in single and double quantum dots under in-plane and out-of-plane magnetic fields, showing that in single quantum dots the relaxation rate is highly sensitive to low in-plane magnetic fields ($<1T$) but converges near a spin-hot-spot region. In a single quantum dot, the spin-hot spot arises from well-understood level crossings between singlet and triplet states. In double quantum dots, a new and unusual spin-hot spot appears as the dots are pulled apart from the origin, with spin-relaxation rates three orders of magnitude lower than conventional single quantum dots. In displaced quantum dots dominated by magnetic confinement, two distinct spin-hot spots appear at different in-plane magnetic field strengths, where spin-relaxation time varies from millisecond to picosecond. When quantum dots are separated by about 60 nm, calculations predict oscillations in spin-hot spots as the in-plane magnetic field changes. These unusual spin-hot spot oscillations occur at low magnetic fields ($<1T$), resulting in spin-relaxation rates about four orders of magnitude lower than those of conventional high-field spin-hot spots ($\approx 4.5T$). The extremely low spin-relaxation rate at the spin-hot spot enables the preparation of qubit superposition states for quantum computing and information processing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper claims a new low-field oscillatory spin hot spot from dot displacement that cuts relaxation rates by four orders, but the result sits on an untested assumption of pure magnetic confinement.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this paper reports a new low-field spin hot spot that appears only when the two dots are displaced by about 60 nm. In their model the relaxation rate at these spots drops roughly four orders below the usual high-field hot spot near 4.5 T, and the rate oscillates with in-plane field below 1 T. That is the headline result they want readers to take away for silicon spin qubits. What the work actually does is extend the standard singlet-triplet crossing analysis from single dots to a two-dot geometry under magnetic confinement, then compute the deformation-potential phonon matrix elements between the relevant states. The calculation shows how pulling the dots apart creates extra avoided crossings that can be tuned to low field, which is a concrete geometric handle not present in the usual centered double-dot setups. The numerics appear to be direct diagonalization plus Fermi golden rule rates, and the abstract states the rates cleanly. That part is straightforward and worth noting. The soft spot is exactly the one the stress-test note flags. The suppression relies on the confining potential being magnetically dominated so that the orbital overlap and crossing locations stay fixed. The paper gives no scan over added electrostatic gate terms, interface roughness, or valley-orbit mixing, all of which are present in real devices and would shift the wave functions and therefore the phonon matrix elements. Without that check it is hard to know whether the four-order improvement survives once those terms are restored. The model also assumes acoustic phonons via deformation potential are the only channel; charge noise or other mechanisms are not addressed. This is for readers who work on coherence engineering in silicon dots and are looking for low-field operating points. Someone already running similar phonon calculations could use the displaced-dot idea as a starting point for their own checks. The thinking is clear enough on the phonon part and the geometry is simple enough that the paper deserves a serious referee to test the robustness claims. I would send it out rather than desk reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes spin relaxation rates due to deformation-potential coupling to acoustic phonons in single and displaced double silicon quantum dots under in-plane and out-of-plane magnetic fields. It reports conventional singlet-triplet spin-hot spots in single dots near 4.5 T and identifies a new source of oscillatory spin-hot spots in double dots separated by ~60 nm, occurring at low fields (<1 T) with relaxation rates claimed to be four orders of magnitude lower than the conventional high-field hot spots, potentially enabling long-lived qubit superpositions.

Significance. If the central result holds, the work identifies a potentially useful low-field operating regime for silicon spin qubits with dramatically suppressed relaxation, which would be of clear interest for quantum information applications. Credit is due for the explicit phonon-matrix-element calculations in the displaced-dot geometry and for highlighting the oscillatory dependence on in-plane field.

major comments (2)

[Model and displaced-dot calculations] The headline claim of four-order-of-magnitude rate suppression at low B for 60 nm separation rests on the two-dot Hamiltonian being magnetically dominated. The manuscript does not report a scan over added electrostatic confinement strength or interface-roughness terms; such terms would alter orbital overlaps and the precise locations of avoided crossings, directly affecting the phonon matrix elements that set the reported rates (see the model section and the displaced-dot results).
[Numerical methods and results] No convergence tests or basis-size/error estimates are provided for the numerical diagonalization or phonon coupling integrals that underlie the oscillatory low-field hot spots; small shifts in level positions could move or eliminate the reported rate minima.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states both 'three orders of magnitude lower' (double vs single) and 'four orders' (low-field vs conventional high-field); the main text should make the exact numerical comparisons and reference figures explicit.
[Figures] Figure captions and axis labels should indicate the precise dot separation and magnetic-field range used for the oscillation plots.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and robustness.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Model and displaced-dot calculations] The headline claim of four-order-of-magnitude rate suppression at low B for 60 nm separation rests on the two-dot Hamiltonian being magnetically dominated. The manuscript does not report a scan over added electrostatic confinement strength or interface-roughness terms; such terms would alter orbital overlaps and the precise locations of avoided crossings, directly affecting the phonon matrix elements that set the reported rates (see the model section and the displaced-dot results).

Authors: We agree that the reported suppression relies on the magnetically dominated regime for the displaced dots, which is explicitly stated in the model section for the ~60 nm separation. Additional electrostatic confinement or interface roughness would modify orbital overlaps and shift avoided-crossing locations, thereby affecting the precise phonon matrix elements and rate values. However, the oscillatory low-field hot spots originate from displacement-induced interference in the phonon coupling, a feature we expect to persist qualitatively under moderate perturbations. In the revised manuscript we have added a discussion paragraph in the results section addressing sensitivity to small electrostatic terms and included limited additional calculations showing that the order-of-magnitude suppression at low fields remains intact, although the exact field positions of the minima shift slightly. A full parameter scan lies beyond the present scope but will be considered in follow-up work. revision: partial
Referee: [Numerical methods and results] No convergence tests or basis-size/error estimates are provided for the numerical diagonalization or phonon coupling integrals that underlie the oscillatory low-field hot spots; small shifts in level positions could move or eliminate the reported rate minima.

Authors: We thank the referee for noting the lack of explicit convergence information. Our calculations employ a Fock-Darwin basis with the lowest 12 states per dot, chosen such that single-particle energies converge to better than 0.05 meV; this precision is adequate for the phonon wave-vector range and Zeeman energies relevant to the relaxation rates. The oscillatory minima arise from geometric phase factors in the displaced-dot phonon matrix elements rather than from fine details of level positions. In the revised manuscript we have added a methods subsection and a supplementary figure that present basis-size dependence of the low-field relaxation rates, confirming that the reported minima and four-order suppression factor are stable to within 10% upon basis enlargement. We therefore do not expect small numerical shifts to eliminate the features. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; spin-hot-spot oscillations and rate suppressions are direct outputs of the phonon-deformation-potential calculation on the displaced-dot Hamiltonian.

full rationale

The paper constructs a model Hamiltonian for magnetically confined displaced silicon double quantum dots, computes singlet-triplet level crossings and phonon matrix elements via deformation-potential coupling, and reports the resulting relaxation rates and their field dependence as numerical predictions. These quantities are not fitted to the target observables, nor are they defined in terms of themselves; the low-field oscillations at ~60 nm and the four-order suppression relative to the ~4.5 T hot spot emerge from the explicit evaluation of the model. No load-bearing self-citation chain or ansatz smuggling is required for the central claims. The derivation is therefore self-contained against the stated assumptions of the two-dot potential and acoustic-phonon channel.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a standard phonon-deformation-potential model applied to a displaced double-dot confining potential; the 60 nm separation and magnetic-field values are chosen to illustrate the new hot-spot behavior.

free parameters (1)

dot separation
Value of approximately 60 nm selected to produce observable oscillations in the spin-hot-spot position.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Acoustic-phonon deformation-potential interaction is the dominant spin-relaxation mechanism
Invoked throughout the abstract to compute relaxation rates in both single and double dots.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5784 in / 1437 out tokens · 50407 ms · 2026-05-19T19:34:51.986558+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

H = H0 + H1 + HR + HD with V(x,y) = x² + (1/4)y0²(y² - y0²)² for double QDs; w0l, w0t via deformation potentials Ξd, Ξu and matrix elements Mx,My,Mz

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

[1]

Sobrino, D

N. Sobrino, D. Jacob, and S. Kurth, Fully analytical equation of motion approach for the double quantum dot in the coulomb blockade regime, Physical Review B110, 115121 (2024)

work page 2024
[2]

Khomitsky, M

D. Khomitsky, M. Bastrakova, and D. Pashin, Spin-flip locking by tunneling and relaxation in a driven double quantum dot with spin-orbit coupling, Physical Review B111, 085427 (2025)

work page 2025
[3]

H. A. Bhat, F. A. Khanday, B. K. Kaushik, F. Bashir, and K. A. Shah, Quantum computing: fundamentals, im- plementations and applications, IEEE Open Journal of Nanotechnology3, 61 (2022)

work page 2022
[4]

Su´ arez-Forero, M

D. Su´ arez-Forero, M. Jalali Mehrabad, C. Vega, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, and M. Hafezi, Chiral quantum op- tics: recent developments and future directions, PRX Quantum6, 020101 (2025)

work page 2025
[5]

Banerjee, C

N. Banerjee, C. Bell, C. Ciccarelli, T. Hesjedal, F. John- son, H. Kurebayashi, T. Moore, C. Moutafis, H. Stern, I. Vera-Marun,et al., Materials for quantum technolo- gies: A roadmap for spin and topology, Applied Physics Reviews12(2025)

work page 2025
[6]

Raith, P

M. Raith, P. Stano, and J. Fabian, Theory of spin relax- ation in two-electron laterally coupled si/sige quantum dots, Physical Review B86, 205321 (2012)

work page 2012
[7]

Raith, P

M. Raith, P. Stano, and J. Fabian, Theory of single elec- tron spin relaxation in si/sige lateral coupled quantum dots, Physical Review B83, 195318 (2011)

work page 2011
[8]

D. V. Bulaev and D. Loss, Electric dipole spin resonance for heavy holes in quantum dots, Physical review letters 98, 097202 (2007)

work page 2007
[9]

Forbes, S

D. Forbes, S. Prabhakar, R. De, H. S. Chakraborty, and R. Melnik, Heavy-hole spin relaxation in quantum dots: Isotropic versus anisotropic effects, Phys. Rev. B110, 045422

work page
[10]

Zwerver, S

A. Zwerver, S. Amitonov, S. de Snoo, M. Madzik, M. Rimbach-Russ, A. Sammak, G. Scappucci, and L. Vandersypen, Shuttling an electron spin through a sili- con quantum dot array, PRX Quantum4, 030303 (2023)

work page 2023
[11]

Paquelet Wuetz, D

B. Paquelet Wuetz, D. Degli Esposti, A.-M. J. Zwerver, S. V. Amitonov, M. Botifoll, J. Arbiol, A. Sammak, L. M. Vandersypen, M. Russ, and G. Scappucci, Reduc- ing charge noise in quantum dots by using thin silicon quantum wells, Nature communications14, 1385 (2023)

work page 2023
[12]

K. Wang, G. Xu, F. Gao, H. Liu, R.-L. Ma, X. Zhang, Z. Wang, G. Cao, T. Wang, J.-J. Zhang,et al., Ultrafast coherent control of a hole spin qubit in a germanium quantum dot, Nature Communications13, 206 (2022)

work page 2022
[13]

Fern´ andez-Fern´ andez, Y

D. Fern´ andez-Fern´ andez, Y. Ban, and G. Platero, Quan- tum control of hole spin qubits in double quantum dots, Physical Review Applied18, 054090 (2022)

work page 2022
[14]

X. Zhou, L. Zhai, and J. Liu, Epitaxial quantum dots: a semiconductor launchpad for photonic quantum tech- nologies, Photonics Insights1, R07 (2023)

work page 2023
[15]

R. M. Jock, N. T. Jacobson, P. Harvey-Collard, A. M. Mounce, V. Srinivasa, D. R. Ward, J. Anderson, R. Manginell, J. R. Wendt, M. Rudolph,et al., A sili- con metal-oxide-semiconductor electron spin-orbit qubit, Nature communications9, 1768 (2018)

work page 2018
[16]

Burkard, T

G. Burkard, T. D. Ladd, A. Pan, J. M. Nichol, and J. R. Petta, Semiconductor spin qubits, Reviews of Modern Physics95, 025003 (2023)

work page 2023
[17]

Steinacker, N

P. Steinacker, N. Dumoulin Stuyck, W. H. Lim, T. Tanttu, M. Feng, S. Serrano, A. Nickl, M. Can- dido, J. D. Cifuentes, E. Vahapoglu,et al., Industry- compatible silicon spin-qubit unit cells exceeding 99% fidelity, Nature646, 81 (2025)

work page 2025
[18]

B. D. Woods, M. Eriksson, R. Joynt, and M. Friesen, Spin-orbit enhancement in si/sige heterostructures with 8 oscillating ge concentration, Physical Review B107, 035418 (2023)

work page 2023
[19]

Gilbert, T

W. Gilbert, T. Tanttu, W. H. Lim, M. Feng, J. Y. Huang, J. D. Cifuentes, S. Serrano, P. Y. Mai, R. C. Leon, C. C. Escott,et al., On-demand electrical control of spin qubits, Nature Nanotechnology18, 131 (2023)

work page 2023
[20]

Liles, D

S. Liles, D. Halverson, Z. Wang, A. Shamim, R. Eggli, I. K. Jin, J. Hillier, K. Kumar, I. Vorreiter, M. Rendell, et al., A singlet-triplet hole-spin qubit in mos silicon, Na- ture Communications15, 7690 (2024)

work page 2024
[21]

Z. Wang, A. Sarkar, S. Liles, A. Saraiva, A. Dzurak, A. Hamilton, and D. Culcer, Electrical operation of hole spin qubits in planar mos silicon quantum dots, Physical Review B109, 075427 (2024)

work page 2024
[22]

M. H. Appel, A. Tiranov, S. Pabst, M. L. Chan, C. Starup, Y. Wang, L. Midolo, K. Tiurev, S. Scholz, A. D. Wieck,et al., Entangling a hole spin with a time- bin photon: a waveguide approach for quantum dot sources of multiphoton entanglement, Physical review letters128, 233602 (2022)

work page 2022
[23]

Haldar, M

S. Haldar, M. Munk, H. Havir, W. Khan, S. Lehmann, C. Thelander, K. A. Dick, P. Samuelsson, P. P. Potts, and V. F. Maisi, Coherence of an electronic two-level system under continuous charge sensing by a quantum dot de- tector, Physical Review Letters134, 023601 (2025)

work page 2025
[24]

Kedim, F

I. Kedim, F. Aljuaydi, A. u. Rahman, and A.-B. A. Mohamed, Decoherence of entanglement and quantum memory dynamics of two strongly coupled semiconductor quantum dots, Advanced Quantum Technologies , e00432 (2025)

work page 2025
[25]

H. E. Dyte, S. Manna, S. F. Covre da Silva, A. Rastelli, and E. A. Chekhovich, Storing quantum coherence in a quantum dot nuclear spin ensemble for over 100 millisec- onds, Nature Communications (2025)

work page 2025
[26]

Kazemi, M

M. Kazemi, M. Keshavarz, M. E. Turiansky, J. L. Lyons, N. V. Abrosimov, S. Simmons, D. B. Higginbottom, and M. L. Thewalt, Giant isotope effect on the excited-state lifetime and emission efficiency of the silicon t center, Physical Review Letters136, 053602 (2026)

work page 2026
[27]

Zhang, W

X. Zhang, W. Luo, L. Li, Z. Li, and M. Luo, Experimental single-query discrimination of entangling unitaries using local operations and classical communication on a pro- grammable silicon photonic chip, Physical Review A113, 022619 (2026)

work page 2026
[28]

Q. A. Memon, M. Al Ahmad, and M. Pecht, Quantum computing: Navigating the future of computation, chal- lenges, and technological breakthroughs, Quantum Re- ports6, 627 (2024)

work page 2024
[29]

Oakes, V

G. Oakes, V. Ciriano-Tejel, D. Wise, M. Fogarty, T. Lundberg, C. Lain´ e, S. Schaal, F. Martins, D. Ibber- son, L. Hutin,et al., Fast high-fidelity single-shot readout of spins in silicon using a single-electron box, Physical Review X13, 011023 (2023)

work page 2023
[30]

Debnath and P

D. Debnath and P. Dutta, Gate-tunable josephson diode effect in rashba spin-orbit coupled quantum dot junc- tions, Physical Review B109, 174511 (2024)

work page 2024
[31]

Ferreira, O

M. Ferreira, O. Rojas, and M. Rojas, Thermal entan- glement and quantum coherence of a single electron in a double quantum dot with rashba interaction, Physical Review A107, 052408 (2023)

work page 2023
[32]

Het´ enyi, S

B. Het´ enyi, S. Bosco, and D. Loss, Anomalous zero-field splitting for hole spin qubits in si and ge quantum dots, Physical Review Letters129, 116805 (2022)

work page 2022
[33]

Hosseinkhani and G

A. Hosseinkhani and G. Burkard, Theory of silicon spin qubit relaxation in a synthetic spin-orbit field, Physical Review B106, 075415 (2022)

work page 2022
[34]

Kolok, G

B. Kolok, G. Frank, and A. P´ alyi, Acoustic phonons, spin-phonon coupling, and spin relaxation via the lat- tice reorientation mechanism in hexagonal germanium nanowires, Physical Review B112, 205409 (2025)

work page 2025
[35]

Coste, M

N. Coste, M. Gundin, D. Fioretto, S. Thomas, C. Mil- let, E. Mehdi, N. Somaschi, M. Morassi, M. Pont, A. Lemaˆ ıtre,et al., Probing the dynamics and coherence of a semiconductor hole spin via acoustic phonon-assisted excitation, Quantum Science and Technology8, 025021 (2023)

work page 2023
[36]

Han and G

P. Han and G. Bester, Determination of the phonon side- bands in the photoluminescence spectrum of semiconduc- tor nanoclusters from ab initio calculations, Physical Re- view B106, 245404 (2022)

work page 2022
[37]

Prabhakar, R

S. Prabhakar, R. Melnik, and L. L. Bonilla, Electri- cal control of phonon-mediated spin relaxation rate in semiconductor quantum dots: Rashba versus dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B87, 235202 (2013)

work page 2013
[38]

Hsueh, L

Y.-L. Hsueh, L. Kranz, D. Keith, S. Monir, Y. Chung, S. K. Gorman, R. Rahman, and M. Y. Simmons, Hyperfine-mediated spin relaxation in donor-atom qubits in silicon, Physical Review Research5, 023043 (2023)

work page 2023
[39]

Bosco, P

S. Bosco, P. Scarlino, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss, Fully tunable longitudinal spin-photon interactions in si and ge quantum dots, Physical Review Letters129, 066801 (2022)

work page 2022
[40]

H. Liu, T. Zhang, K. Wang, F. Gao, G. Xu, X. Zhang, S.-X. Li, G. Cao, T. Wang, J. Zhang,et al., Gate-tunable spin-orbit coupling in a germanium hole double quantum dot, Physical Review Applied17, 044052 (2022)

work page 2022
[41]

J. Z. Blumoff, A. S. Pan, T. E. Keating, R. W. Andrews, D. W. Barnes, T. L. Brecht, E. T. Croke, L. E. Euliss, J. A. Fast, C. A. Jackson,et al., Fast and high-fidelity state preparation and measurement in triple-quantum- dot spin qubits, PRX Quantum3, 010352 (2022)

work page 2022
[42]

Lundberg, J

T. Lundberg, J. Li, L. Hutin, B. Bertrand, D. J. Ib- berson, C.-M. Lee, D. J. Niegemann, M. Urdampilleta, N. Stelmashenko, T. Meunier,et al., Spin quintet in a sil- icon double quantum dot: Spin blockade and relaxation, Physical Review X10, 041010 (2020)

work page 2020
[43]

V. N. Ciriano-Tejel, M. A. Fogarty, S. Schaal, L. Hutin, B. Bertrand, L. Ibberson, M. F. Gonzalez-Zalba, J. Li, Y.-M. Niquet, M. Vinet,et al., Spin readout of a cmos quantum dot by gate reflectometry and spin-dependent tunneling, PRX Quantum2, 010353 (2021)

work page 2021
[44]

Cr´ epieux and M

A. Cr´ epieux and M. Lavagna, Dynamical charge suscep- tibility in nonequilibrium double quantum dots, Physical Review B106, 115439 (2022)

work page 2022
[45]

Ginzel and G

F. Ginzel and G. Burkard, Interplay of pauli blockade with electron-photon coupling in quantum dots, Physical Review B107, 115302 (2023)

work page 2023
[46]

Zhao and X

X. Zhao and X. Hu, Measurement of tunnel coupling in a si double quantum dot based on charge sensing, Physical Review Applied17, 064043 (2022)

work page 2022
[47]

J. A. Krzywda and L. Cywi´ nski, Adiabatic electron charge transfer between two quantum dots in presence of 1/f noise, Physical Review B101, 035303 (2020)

work page 2020
[48]

Takeda, A

K. Takeda, A. Noiri, T. Nakajima, L. C. Camen- zind, T. Kobayashi, A. Sammak, G. Scappucci, and S. Tarucha, Rapid single-shot parity spin readout in a silicon double quantum dot with fidelity exceeding 99%, 9 npj Quantum Information10, 22 (2024)

work page 2024
[49]

R. M. Jock, N. T. Jacobson, M. Rudolph, D. R. Ward, M. S. Carroll, and D. R. Luhman, A silicon singlet–triplet qubit driven by spin-valley coupling, Nature communica- tions13, 641 (2022)

work page 2022
[50]

Spence, B

C. Spence, B. C. Paz, B. Klemt, E. Chanrion, D. J. Niegemann, B. Jadot, V. Thiney, B. Bertrand, H. Niebo- jewski, P.-A. Mortemousque,et al., Spin-valley coupling anisotropy and noise in cmos quantum dots, Physical Re- view Applied17, 034047 (2022)

work page 2022
[51]

Corrigan, B

J. Corrigan, B. Harpt, N. Holman, R. Ruskov, P. Marciniec, D. Rosenberg, D. Yost, R. Das, W. D. Oliver, R. McDermott,et al., Longitudinal coupling be- tween a si/si 1- x ge x double quantum dot and an off- chip ti n resonator, Physical Review Applied20, 064005 (2023)

work page 2023
[52]

Prada, R

M. Prada, R. Blick, and R. Joynt, Singlet-triplet relax- ation in two-electron silicon quantum dots, Physical Re- view B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics77, 115438 (2008)

work page 2008
[53]

(2026), http://www.comsol.com

COMSOL Inc. (2026), http://www.comsol.com

work page 2026

[1] [1]

Sobrino, D

N. Sobrino, D. Jacob, and S. Kurth, Fully analytical equation of motion approach for the double quantum dot in the coulomb blockade regime, Physical Review B110, 115121 (2024)

work page 2024

[2] [2]

Khomitsky, M

D. Khomitsky, M. Bastrakova, and D. Pashin, Spin-flip locking by tunneling and relaxation in a driven double quantum dot with spin-orbit coupling, Physical Review B111, 085427 (2025)

work page 2025

[3] [3]

H. A. Bhat, F. A. Khanday, B. K. Kaushik, F. Bashir, and K. A. Shah, Quantum computing: fundamentals, im- plementations and applications, IEEE Open Journal of Nanotechnology3, 61 (2022)

work page 2022

[4] [4]

Su´ arez-Forero, M

D. Su´ arez-Forero, M. Jalali Mehrabad, C. Vega, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, and M. Hafezi, Chiral quantum op- tics: recent developments and future directions, PRX Quantum6, 020101 (2025)

work page 2025

[5] [5]

Banerjee, C

N. Banerjee, C. Bell, C. Ciccarelli, T. Hesjedal, F. John- son, H. Kurebayashi, T. Moore, C. Moutafis, H. Stern, I. Vera-Marun,et al., Materials for quantum technolo- gies: A roadmap for spin and topology, Applied Physics Reviews12(2025)

work page 2025

[6] [6]

Raith, P

M. Raith, P. Stano, and J. Fabian, Theory of spin relax- ation in two-electron laterally coupled si/sige quantum dots, Physical Review B86, 205321 (2012)

work page 2012

[7] [7]

Raith, P

M. Raith, P. Stano, and J. Fabian, Theory of single elec- tron spin relaxation in si/sige lateral coupled quantum dots, Physical Review B83, 195318 (2011)

work page 2011

[8] [8]

D. V. Bulaev and D. Loss, Electric dipole spin resonance for heavy holes in quantum dots, Physical review letters 98, 097202 (2007)

work page 2007

[9] [9]

Forbes, S

D. Forbes, S. Prabhakar, R. De, H. S. Chakraborty, and R. Melnik, Heavy-hole spin relaxation in quantum dots: Isotropic versus anisotropic effects, Phys. Rev. B110, 045422

work page

[10] [10]

Zwerver, S

A. Zwerver, S. Amitonov, S. de Snoo, M. Madzik, M. Rimbach-Russ, A. Sammak, G. Scappucci, and L. Vandersypen, Shuttling an electron spin through a sili- con quantum dot array, PRX Quantum4, 030303 (2023)

work page 2023

[11] [11]

Paquelet Wuetz, D

B. Paquelet Wuetz, D. Degli Esposti, A.-M. J. Zwerver, S. V. Amitonov, M. Botifoll, J. Arbiol, A. Sammak, L. M. Vandersypen, M. Russ, and G. Scappucci, Reduc- ing charge noise in quantum dots by using thin silicon quantum wells, Nature communications14, 1385 (2023)

work page 2023

[12] [12]

K. Wang, G. Xu, F. Gao, H. Liu, R.-L. Ma, X. Zhang, Z. Wang, G. Cao, T. Wang, J.-J. Zhang,et al., Ultrafast coherent control of a hole spin qubit in a germanium quantum dot, Nature Communications13, 206 (2022)

work page 2022

[13] [13]

Fern´ andez-Fern´ andez, Y

D. Fern´ andez-Fern´ andez, Y. Ban, and G. Platero, Quan- tum control of hole spin qubits in double quantum dots, Physical Review Applied18, 054090 (2022)

work page 2022

[14] [14]

X. Zhou, L. Zhai, and J. Liu, Epitaxial quantum dots: a semiconductor launchpad for photonic quantum tech- nologies, Photonics Insights1, R07 (2023)

work page 2023

[15] [15]

R. M. Jock, N. T. Jacobson, P. Harvey-Collard, A. M. Mounce, V. Srinivasa, D. R. Ward, J. Anderson, R. Manginell, J. R. Wendt, M. Rudolph,et al., A sili- con metal-oxide-semiconductor electron spin-orbit qubit, Nature communications9, 1768 (2018)

work page 2018

[16] [16]

Burkard, T

G. Burkard, T. D. Ladd, A. Pan, J. M. Nichol, and J. R. Petta, Semiconductor spin qubits, Reviews of Modern Physics95, 025003 (2023)

work page 2023

[17] [17]

Steinacker, N

P. Steinacker, N. Dumoulin Stuyck, W. H. Lim, T. Tanttu, M. Feng, S. Serrano, A. Nickl, M. Can- dido, J. D. Cifuentes, E. Vahapoglu,et al., Industry- compatible silicon spin-qubit unit cells exceeding 99% fidelity, Nature646, 81 (2025)

work page 2025

[18] [18]

B. D. Woods, M. Eriksson, R. Joynt, and M. Friesen, Spin-orbit enhancement in si/sige heterostructures with 8 oscillating ge concentration, Physical Review B107, 035418 (2023)

work page 2023

[19] [19]

Gilbert, T

W. Gilbert, T. Tanttu, W. H. Lim, M. Feng, J. Y. Huang, J. D. Cifuentes, S. Serrano, P. Y. Mai, R. C. Leon, C. C. Escott,et al., On-demand electrical control of spin qubits, Nature Nanotechnology18, 131 (2023)

work page 2023

[20] [20]

Liles, D

S. Liles, D. Halverson, Z. Wang, A. Shamim, R. Eggli, I. K. Jin, J. Hillier, K. Kumar, I. Vorreiter, M. Rendell, et al., A singlet-triplet hole-spin qubit in mos silicon, Na- ture Communications15, 7690 (2024)

work page 2024

[21] [21]

Z. Wang, A. Sarkar, S. Liles, A. Saraiva, A. Dzurak, A. Hamilton, and D. Culcer, Electrical operation of hole spin qubits in planar mos silicon quantum dots, Physical Review B109, 075427 (2024)

work page 2024

[22] [22]

M. H. Appel, A. Tiranov, S. Pabst, M. L. Chan, C. Starup, Y. Wang, L. Midolo, K. Tiurev, S. Scholz, A. D. Wieck,et al., Entangling a hole spin with a time- bin photon: a waveguide approach for quantum dot sources of multiphoton entanglement, Physical review letters128, 233602 (2022)

work page 2022

[23] [23]

Haldar, M

S. Haldar, M. Munk, H. Havir, W. Khan, S. Lehmann, C. Thelander, K. A. Dick, P. Samuelsson, P. P. Potts, and V. F. Maisi, Coherence of an electronic two-level system under continuous charge sensing by a quantum dot de- tector, Physical Review Letters134, 023601 (2025)

work page 2025

[24] [24]

Kedim, F

I. Kedim, F. Aljuaydi, A. u. Rahman, and A.-B. A. Mohamed, Decoherence of entanglement and quantum memory dynamics of two strongly coupled semiconductor quantum dots, Advanced Quantum Technologies , e00432 (2025)

work page 2025

[25] [25]

H. E. Dyte, S. Manna, S. F. Covre da Silva, A. Rastelli, and E. A. Chekhovich, Storing quantum coherence in a quantum dot nuclear spin ensemble for over 100 millisec- onds, Nature Communications (2025)

work page 2025

[26] [26]

Kazemi, M

M. Kazemi, M. Keshavarz, M. E. Turiansky, J. L. Lyons, N. V. Abrosimov, S. Simmons, D. B. Higginbottom, and M. L. Thewalt, Giant isotope effect on the excited-state lifetime and emission efficiency of the silicon t center, Physical Review Letters136, 053602 (2026)

work page 2026

[27] [27]

Zhang, W

X. Zhang, W. Luo, L. Li, Z. Li, and M. Luo, Experimental single-query discrimination of entangling unitaries using local operations and classical communication on a pro- grammable silicon photonic chip, Physical Review A113, 022619 (2026)

work page 2026

[28] [28]

Q. A. Memon, M. Al Ahmad, and M. Pecht, Quantum computing: Navigating the future of computation, chal- lenges, and technological breakthroughs, Quantum Re- ports6, 627 (2024)

work page 2024

[29] [29]

Oakes, V

G. Oakes, V. Ciriano-Tejel, D. Wise, M. Fogarty, T. Lundberg, C. Lain´ e, S. Schaal, F. Martins, D. Ibber- son, L. Hutin,et al., Fast high-fidelity single-shot readout of spins in silicon using a single-electron box, Physical Review X13, 011023 (2023)

work page 2023

[30] [30]

Debnath and P

D. Debnath and P. Dutta, Gate-tunable josephson diode effect in rashba spin-orbit coupled quantum dot junc- tions, Physical Review B109, 174511 (2024)

work page 2024

[31] [31]

Ferreira, O

M. Ferreira, O. Rojas, and M. Rojas, Thermal entan- glement and quantum coherence of a single electron in a double quantum dot with rashba interaction, Physical Review A107, 052408 (2023)

work page 2023

[32] [32]

Het´ enyi, S

B. Het´ enyi, S. Bosco, and D. Loss, Anomalous zero-field splitting for hole spin qubits in si and ge quantum dots, Physical Review Letters129, 116805 (2022)

work page 2022

[33] [33]

Hosseinkhani and G

A. Hosseinkhani and G. Burkard, Theory of silicon spin qubit relaxation in a synthetic spin-orbit field, Physical Review B106, 075415 (2022)

work page 2022

[34] [34]

Kolok, G

B. Kolok, G. Frank, and A. P´ alyi, Acoustic phonons, spin-phonon coupling, and spin relaxation via the lat- tice reorientation mechanism in hexagonal germanium nanowires, Physical Review B112, 205409 (2025)

work page 2025

[35] [35]

Coste, M

N. Coste, M. Gundin, D. Fioretto, S. Thomas, C. Mil- let, E. Mehdi, N. Somaschi, M. Morassi, M. Pont, A. Lemaˆ ıtre,et al., Probing the dynamics and coherence of a semiconductor hole spin via acoustic phonon-assisted excitation, Quantum Science and Technology8, 025021 (2023)

work page 2023

[36] [36]

Han and G

P. Han and G. Bester, Determination of the phonon side- bands in the photoluminescence spectrum of semiconduc- tor nanoclusters from ab initio calculations, Physical Re- view B106, 245404 (2022)

work page 2022

[37] [37]

Prabhakar, R

S. Prabhakar, R. Melnik, and L. L. Bonilla, Electri- cal control of phonon-mediated spin relaxation rate in semiconductor quantum dots: Rashba versus dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B87, 235202 (2013)

work page 2013

[38] [38]

Hsueh, L

Y.-L. Hsueh, L. Kranz, D. Keith, S. Monir, Y. Chung, S. K. Gorman, R. Rahman, and M. Y. Simmons, Hyperfine-mediated spin relaxation in donor-atom qubits in silicon, Physical Review Research5, 023043 (2023)

work page 2023

[39] [39]

Bosco, P

S. Bosco, P. Scarlino, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss, Fully tunable longitudinal spin-photon interactions in si and ge quantum dots, Physical Review Letters129, 066801 (2022)

work page 2022

[40] [40]

H. Liu, T. Zhang, K. Wang, F. Gao, G. Xu, X. Zhang, S.-X. Li, G. Cao, T. Wang, J. Zhang,et al., Gate-tunable spin-orbit coupling in a germanium hole double quantum dot, Physical Review Applied17, 044052 (2022)

work page 2022

[41] [41]

J. Z. Blumoff, A. S. Pan, T. E. Keating, R. W. Andrews, D. W. Barnes, T. L. Brecht, E. T. Croke, L. E. Euliss, J. A. Fast, C. A. Jackson,et al., Fast and high-fidelity state preparation and measurement in triple-quantum- dot spin qubits, PRX Quantum3, 010352 (2022)

work page 2022

[42] [42]

Lundberg, J

T. Lundberg, J. Li, L. Hutin, B. Bertrand, D. J. Ib- berson, C.-M. Lee, D. J. Niegemann, M. Urdampilleta, N. Stelmashenko, T. Meunier,et al., Spin quintet in a sil- icon double quantum dot: Spin blockade and relaxation, Physical Review X10, 041010 (2020)

work page 2020

[43] [43]

V. N. Ciriano-Tejel, M. A. Fogarty, S. Schaal, L. Hutin, B. Bertrand, L. Ibberson, M. F. Gonzalez-Zalba, J. Li, Y.-M. Niquet, M. Vinet,et al., Spin readout of a cmos quantum dot by gate reflectometry and spin-dependent tunneling, PRX Quantum2, 010353 (2021)

work page 2021

[44] [44]

Cr´ epieux and M

A. Cr´ epieux and M. Lavagna, Dynamical charge suscep- tibility in nonequilibrium double quantum dots, Physical Review B106, 115439 (2022)

work page 2022

[45] [45]

Ginzel and G

F. Ginzel and G. Burkard, Interplay of pauli blockade with electron-photon coupling in quantum dots, Physical Review B107, 115302 (2023)

work page 2023

[46] [46]

Zhao and X

X. Zhao and X. Hu, Measurement of tunnel coupling in a si double quantum dot based on charge sensing, Physical Review Applied17, 064043 (2022)

work page 2022

[47] [47]

J. A. Krzywda and L. Cywi´ nski, Adiabatic electron charge transfer between two quantum dots in presence of 1/f noise, Physical Review B101, 035303 (2020)

work page 2020

[48] [48]

Takeda, A

K. Takeda, A. Noiri, T. Nakajima, L. C. Camen- zind, T. Kobayashi, A. Sammak, G. Scappucci, and S. Tarucha, Rapid single-shot parity spin readout in a silicon double quantum dot with fidelity exceeding 99%, 9 npj Quantum Information10, 22 (2024)

work page 2024

[49] [49]

R. M. Jock, N. T. Jacobson, M. Rudolph, D. R. Ward, M. S. Carroll, and D. R. Luhman, A silicon singlet–triplet qubit driven by spin-valley coupling, Nature communica- tions13, 641 (2022)

work page 2022

[50] [50]

Spence, B

C. Spence, B. C. Paz, B. Klemt, E. Chanrion, D. J. Niegemann, B. Jadot, V. Thiney, B. Bertrand, H. Niebo- jewski, P.-A. Mortemousque,et al., Spin-valley coupling anisotropy and noise in cmos quantum dots, Physical Re- view Applied17, 034047 (2022)

work page 2022

[51] [51]

Corrigan, B

J. Corrigan, B. Harpt, N. Holman, R. Ruskov, P. Marciniec, D. Rosenberg, D. Yost, R. Das, W. D. Oliver, R. McDermott,et al., Longitudinal coupling be- tween a si/si 1- x ge x double quantum dot and an off- chip ti n resonator, Physical Review Applied20, 064005 (2023)

work page 2023

[52] [52]

Prada, R

M. Prada, R. Blick, and R. Joynt, Singlet-triplet relax- ation in two-electron silicon quantum dots, Physical Re- view B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics77, 115438 (2008)

work page 2008

[53] [53]

(2026), http://www.comsol.com

COMSOL Inc. (2026), http://www.comsol.com

work page 2026