pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17199 · v1 · pith:E64KGALSnew · submitted 2026-05-16 · 🧬 q-bio.NC · cond-mat.dis-nn· physics.bio-ph

Geometric Phase Transition Enables Extreme Hippocampal Memory Capacity

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 13:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.NC cond-mat.dis-nnphysics.bio-ph
keywords geometric phase transitionhippocampal geometryspatial memory capacitycrystalline codingexcitatory inhibitory dynamicsfood caching birdsneural manifold stability
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hippocampal memory capacity jumps over 100-fold when population geometry shifts from disorganized mist to rigid crystalline codes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that food-caching chickadees achieve extreme spatial memory through a geometric phase transition in their hippocampus, creating a crystalline collective code with high stability and coherence. Non-caching zebra finches instead show a disorganized mist geometry that supports far less capacity. This difference arises from excitatory neurons scaffolding space and inhibitory neurons decorrelating in separate subspaces, not from allocating dedicated neurons to each memory. A sympathetic reader would care because it reveals how brains can vastly outperform similar hardware by tuning the geometry of neural representations rather than adding more cells or using discrete slots.

Core claim

Superior spatial memory emerges from a discrete stiffening of hippocampal population geometry—a transition from disorganized to crystalline collective coding. Caching hippocampi maintain topologically rigid geometry with higher geometric stability (Shesha 0.245 vs 0.166) and nearly two-fold greater temporal coherence, constructed by synergistic excitatory-inhibitory circuit dynamics in non-overlapping subspaces. Computational modeling across 10k configurations confirms that crystalline codes sustain high-fidelity readout beyond 1000 locations while mist codes fail below 10, requiring 169-fold representational redundancy as a geometric tax stabilizing the manifold against biological noise.

What carries the argument

The geometric phase transition to crystalline collective coding, which provides topological rigidity and is maintained by excitatory-inhibitory dynamics occupying non-overlapping representational subspaces.

If this is right

  • Crystalline codes provide a greater than 100-fold capacity advantage over mist codes for high-fidelity spatial memory readout.
  • The advantage requires 169-fold representational redundancy to stabilize the geometry against noise.
  • Memory superiority reflects continuous topological organization rather than discrete neuron allocation, as shown by near-zero split-half allocation reliability in caching networks.
  • Evolution achieves high-capacity memory by engineering the geometry of the neural code instead of proliferating neurons.
  • Geometric stability and temporal coherence are actively constructed by the circuit motif of excitatory scaffolds and inhibitory decorrelation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the phase transition is a general mechanism, similar geometric organization could explain capacity variations in other memory systems or brain regions.
  • Artificial networks might gain capacity by enforcing crystalline geometry instead of relying on scale alone.
  • Disrupting the excitatory-inhibitory balance should collapse crystalline stability and reduce capacity, providing a direct test.
  • The geometric tax of redundancy may trade off against other performance metrics such as retrieval speed or adaptability to new environments.

Load-bearing premise

The higher geometric stability and temporal coherence in caching birds are causally due to synergistic excitatory-inhibitory dynamics and are the direct reason for the capacity advantage rather than being correlated with unmeasured factors like total neuron number or anatomy.

What would settle it

Finding that mist-like geometries with artificially increased redundancy can match crystalline readout fidelity beyond 1000 locations, or that disrupting E-I synergy in caching birds does not reduce stability or capacity, would falsify the claim that the geometric transition and circuit dynamics are necessary for the extreme capacity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17199 by Prashant C. Raju.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Geometric rigidity distinguishes hippocampal population codes in food-caching and non-caching birds. (a) Schematic overview. The food-caching black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus) and non-caching zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) possess hippocampi of comparable neuron count and gross connectivity, yet the caching species must store and retrieve thousands of cache locations across a winter season. … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Synergistic excitatory-inhibitory circuit dynamics underlie geometric stability. (a) Conceptual illustration of the E-I geometric scaffold. (Left) The continuous excitatory spatial manifold (blue ring) is stabilized by inhibitory populations acting as structural tethers (springs). By exerting an orthogonal pull, inhibition stiffens the network into a rigid, high-dimensional configuration. (Right) Simulated… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Topological structure determines memory capacity and exacts a geometric tax. (a) Decoding error as a function of memory load 𝑀 for crystal, mist, and noise regimes, with the critical error threshold and estimated phase transition 𝜏crit marked. Inset shows decoding error as a function of topology strength𝜏 at fixed 𝑀 = 100, illustrating the non-linear inflection. (b) Topology advantage (ΔError = Errorrandom… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Memory systems can store vastly different amounts of information despite similar hardware constraints. Here, we show that superior spatial memory emerges from a discrete stiffening of hippocampal population geometry-a transition from disorganized to crystalline collective coding. Comparing food-caching chickadees to non-caching zebra finches, we found that the caching hippocampus maintains a topologically rigid, "crystalline" geometry with significantly higher geometric stability (Shesha 0.245 v 0.166) and nearly two-fold greater temporal coherence (Shesha 0.393 v 0.209), while the non-caching hippocampus resembles a disorganized "mist." This stability is actively constructed by synergistic circuit dynamics: excitatory neurons form the spatial scaffold while inhibitory populations contribute orthogonal decorrelation, a circuit motif in which excitatory and inhibitory populations occupy largely non-overlapping representational subspaces. A double dissociation with Valiant's Stable Memory Allocator, a model predicting that dedicated neuron ensembles underlie each memory, confirms this advantage reflects continuous topological organization rather than discrete neuron allocation: caching networks exhibit near-zero split-half allocation reliability despite their geometric superiority. Computational modeling across 10k configurations reveals topological rigidity as the mathematical prerequisite for scale: crystalline codes sustain high-fidelity readout beyond M=1k locations while mist codes fail below M=10, a >100-fold capacity advantage. This capacity requires a 169fold representational redundancy: a "geometric tax" stabilizing the manifold against biological noise. These results establish geometric stability as a candidate organizing principle of biological memory: evolution achieves high-capacity memory not by proliferating neurons, but by engineering the geometry of the neural code itself.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that superior spatial memory capacity in food-caching chickadees versus non-caching zebra finches arises from a geometric phase transition in hippocampal population coding, shifting from disorganized 'mist' to rigid 'crystalline' geometry. This transition is attributed to synergistic excitatory-inhibitory circuit dynamics with non-overlapping representational subspaces, evidenced by higher geometric stability (Shesha 0.245 vs. 0.166) and temporal coherence (0.393 vs. 0.209), a double dissociation from Valiant's discrete allocator model, and 10k-configuration simulations showing >100-fold capacity advantage (M>1k vs. M<10) that requires a 169-fold representational redundancy or 'geometric tax' to stabilize the manifold against noise.

Significance. If the central claims hold after addressing confounds, the work would identify geometric stability and topological rigidity as a candidate organizing principle for scaling biological memory capacity without neuron proliferation, with the double dissociation against discrete allocation providing a useful falsifiable contrast. The modeling demonstrates a mathematical prerequisite for rigidity but does not include machine-checked proofs or fully parameter-free derivations.

major comments (3)
  1. [Comparative recordings and circuit-motif analysis] The causal attribution of the Shesha stability gap (0.245 vs. 0.166) and temporal coherence difference to synergistic E-I subspace organization is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the species comparison (caching chickadees vs. non-caching zebra finches) leaves open species-level anatomical confounds such as total hippocampal neuron count or volume that could produce the observed geometry independently of the reported circuit motif.
  2. [Computational modeling across 10k configurations] The modeling across 10k configurations reports crystalline codes sustaining high-fidelity readout beyond M=1k locations while mist codes fail below M=10, but this demonstration assumes the crystalline geometry derived from the biological data; it does not test whether the recorded stability parameters, once neuron number is matched, actually place the system in the regime yielding the reported >100-fold capacity advantage.
  3. [Modeling results and abstract] The 169-fold representational redundancy ('geometric tax') and capacity advantage are presented as outputs revealing the prerequisite for rigidity, but the simulations that generate these numbers presuppose the crystalline geometry, creating a circularity burden between the fit and the claimed mathematical necessity.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract summarizes comparative recordings and modeling outcomes but provides no error bars, statistical tests, exclusion criteria, or validation details for the Shesha metrics or capacity claims, which would strengthen assessment of robustness.
  2. [Throughout manuscript] Custom terms such as 'Shesha' stability and 'crystalline' vs. 'mist' geometry should be defined with explicit formulas or references upon first use to improve clarity for readers outside the immediate subfield.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. These have prompted us to clarify several aspects of the comparative design, modeling assumptions, and interpretation of the geometric tax. We respond to each major comment below and indicate the revisions planned for the resubmitted manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The causal attribution of the Shesha stability gap (0.245 vs. 0.166) and temporal coherence difference to synergistic E-I subspace organization is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the species comparison (caching chickadees vs. non-caching zebra finches) leaves open species-level anatomical confounds such as total hippocampal neuron count or volume that could produce the observed geometry independently of the reported circuit motif.

    Authors: We acknowledge that cross-species comparisons inherently carry the risk of anatomical confounds. Our primary evidence for the circuit-motif interpretation rests on the double dissociation with Valiant’s discrete allocator (near-zero split-half reliability despite geometric superiority) together with the direct observation of non-overlapping E-I representational subspaces. We will add a dedicated paragraph in the Discussion that (i) summarizes published stereological estimates of hippocampal volume and neuron number in these two species and (ii) explains why the subspace orthogonality finding is difficult to attribute solely to gross size differences. We will also explicitly list this as a limitation of the comparative approach. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The modeling across 10k configurations reports crystalline codes sustaining high-fidelity readout beyond M=1k locations while mist codes fail below M=10, but this demonstration assumes the crystalline geometry derived from the biological data; it does not test whether the recorded stability parameters, once neuron number is matched, actually place the system in the regime yielding the reported >100-fold capacity advantage.

    Authors: The 10k-configuration sweep samples stability parameters centered on the empirically measured Shesha and coherence values for each species. To address the neuron-number concern directly, we will add a new supplementary figure that fixes neuron count to an identical value for both crystalline and mist models while retaining the species-specific stability parameters. This will demonstrate that the capacity gap remains >100-fold even under matched neuron number. revision: yes

  3. Referee: The 169-fold representational redundancy ('geometric tax') and capacity advantage are presented as outputs revealing the prerequisite for rigidity, but the simulations that generate these numbers presuppose the crystalline geometry, creating a circularity burden between the fit and the claimed mathematical necessity.

    Authors: The geometry parameters are measured directly from the recordings and supplied as fixed inputs; no optimization is performed to match capacity. The simulations then quantify the redundancy required to keep the measured crystalline manifold stable under biological noise levels. We will revise the modeling section and abstract to state explicitly that the geometry is an empirical input and that the tax is a derived computational requirement, thereby removing any suggestion of circular fitting. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; modeling demonstrates mathematical consequence of observed geometries

full rationale

The derivation proceeds from direct biological recordings (Shesha stability and coherence differences between species) to computational modeling of 10k configurations that tests the capacity implications of crystalline versus mist geometries. The reported >100-fold capacity advantage and 169-fold geometric tax are outputs of forward simulation under the observed geometries, not inputs or self-definitions. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, a self-citation chain, or an ansatz smuggled from prior work. The central claim that rigidity is a prerequisite for scale is a mathematical demonstration rather than a tautology, and the paper remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim depends on measured geometric metrics from two species, an assumed excitatory-inhibitory circuit motif, and simulation outputs that define both the capacity advantage and the required redundancy; these elements are not independently derived from first principles or external benchmarks.

free parameters (2)
  • geometric stability threshold
    The distinction between crystalline (Shesha 0.245) and mist (0.166) geometries is used to classify the phase transition and drive the capacity predictions.
  • 169-fold representational redundancy
    The geometric tax is introduced as the redundancy level needed to stabilize the manifold, appearing as a model-derived quantity.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Excitatory neurons form the spatial scaffold while inhibitory populations contribute orthogonal decorrelation in non-overlapping subspaces
    Invoked to explain how the crystalline geometry is actively constructed.
invented entities (1)
  • crystalline vs mist hippocampal geometry no independent evidence
    purpose: To explain the capacity difference as a topological phase transition
    New descriptive framework applied to the observed population codes; no independent falsifiable prediction outside the model is supplied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5821 in / 1594 out tokens · 88306 ms · 2026-05-20T13:35:50.074302+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Statistical mechanics of neural networks near saturation

    Daniel J Amit, Hanoch Gutfreund, and H Sompolinsky. “Statistical mechanics of neural networks near saturation”. In:Annals of Physics173.1 (Jan. 1987), pp. 30–67.issn: 0003-4916.doi:10.1016/0003- 4916(87)90092- 3.url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(87)90092-3

  2. [2]

    , year =

    Dmitriy Aronov, Rhino Nevers, and David W. Tank. “Mapping of a non-spatial dimension by the hippocampal–entorhinal circuit”. In:Nature543.7647 (Mar. 2017), pp. 719–722.issn: 1476-4687.doi:10 . 1038 / nature21692.url:http : //dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature21692

  3. [3]

    Toward a molecular definition of long-term memory storage

    Craig H. Bailey, Dusan Bartsch, and Eric R. Kandel. “Toward a molecular definition of long-term memory storage”. In:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences93.24 (Nov. 1996), pp. 13445–13452.issn: 1091-6490.doi:10. 1073/pnas.93.24.13445.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.24.13445

  4. [4]

    Pattern Separation in the Human Hip- pocampal CA3 and Dentate Gyrus

    Arnold Bakker, C. Brock Kirwan, Michael Miller, and Craig E. L. Stark. “Pattern Separation in the Human Hip- pocampal CA3 and Dentate Gyrus”. In:Science319.5870 (Mar. 2008), pp. 1640–1642.issn: 1095-9203.doi:10.1126/ science.1152882.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1152882

  5. [5]

    Long-term spatial memory in clark’s nutcracker, Nucifraga columbiana

    Russell P. Balda and Alan C. Kamil. “Long-term spatial memory in clark’s nutcracker, Nucifraga columbiana”. In: Animal Behaviour44.4 (Oct. 1992), pp. 761–769.issn: 0003-3472.doi:10.1016/s0003- 3472(05)80302- 1.url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80302-1

  6. [6]

    Computational principles of synaptic memory consolidation

    Marcus K Benna and Stefano Fusi. “Computational principles of synaptic memory consolidation”. In:Nature Neu- roscience19.12 (Oct. 2016), pp. 1697–1706.issn: 1546-1726.doi:10.1038/nn.4401.url:http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/nn.4401

  7. [7]

    Place cells may simply be memory cells: Memory compression leads to spatial tuning and history dependence

    Marcus K. Benna and Stefano Fusi. “Place cells may simply be memory cells: Memory compression leads to spatial tuning and history dependence”. In:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118.51 (Dec. 2021).issn: 1091- 6490.doi:10.1073/pnas.2018422118.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2018422118. 10

  8. [8]

    The Ge- ometry of Abstraction in the Hippocampus and Prefrontal Cortex

    Silvia Bernardi, Marcus K. Benna, Mattia Rigotti, Jérôme Munuera, Stefano Fusi, and C. Daniel Salzman. “The Ge- ometry of Abstraction in the Hippocampus and Prefrontal Cortex”. In:Cell183.4 (Nov. 2020), 954–967.e21.issn: 0092-8674.doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.031.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.031

  9. [9]

    Tuned geometries of hip- pocampal representations meet the computational demands of social memory

    Lara M. Boyle, Lorenzo Posani, Sarah Irfan, Steven A. Siegelbaum, and Stefano Fusi. “Tuned geometries of hip- pocampal representations meet the computational demands of social memory”. In:Neuron112.8 (Apr. 2024), 1358– 1371.e9.issn: 0896-6273.doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2024.01.021.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron. 2024.01.021

  10. [10]

    4 in e-Moll, Op

    Johannes Brahms.Symphonie Nr. 4 in e-Moll, Op. 98. First edition. Plate 8686. Engraved by C.G. Röder, Leipzig. Berlin: N. Simrock, 1886

  11. [11]

    Matching location and color of a compound stimulus: Comparison of a food-storing and a nonstoring bird species

    David R. Brodbeck and Sara J. Shettleworth. “Matching location and color of a compound stimulus: Comparison of a food-storing and a nonstoring bird species.” In:Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 21.1 (Jan. 1995), pp. 64–77.issn: 0097-7403.doi:10.1037/0097-7403.21.1.64.url:http://dx.doi.org/10. 1037/0097-7403.21.1.64

  12. [12]

    PLOS Computational Biology13(2), 1005179 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal

    Yoram Burak and Ila R. Fiete. “Accurate Path Integration in Continuous Attractor Network Models of Grid Cells”. In: PLoS Computational Biology5.2 (Feb. 2009). Ed. by Olaf Sporns, e1000291.issn: 1553-7358.doi:10.1371/journal. pcbi.1000291.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000291

  13. [13]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences105(38), 14615–14619 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas

    Yoram Burak and Ila R. Fiete. “Fundamental limits on persistent activity in networks of noisy neurons”. In:Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences109.43 (Oct. 2012), pp. 17645–17650.issn: 1091-6490.doi:10.1073/pnas. 1117386109.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1117386109

  14. [14]

    1996.Evolutionary Algorithms in Theory and Practice: Evolution Strategies, Evolutionary Programming, Genetic Algorithms

    György Buzsáki.Rhythms of the Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.isbn: 9780199828234.doi:10.1093/ acprof:oso/9780195301069.001.0001

  15. [15]

    Partially connected models of neural networks

    A Canning and E Gardner. “Partially connected models of neural networks”. In:Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General21.15 (Aug. 1988), pp. 3275–3284.issn: 1361-6447.doi:10 . 1088 / 0305 - 4470 / 21 / 15 / 016.url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/21/15/016

  16. [16]

    The intrinsic attractor manifold and population dynamics of a canonical cognitive circuit across waking and sleep

    Rishidev Chaudhuri, Berk Gerçek, Biraj Pandey, Adrien Peyrache, and Ila Fiete. “The intrinsic attractor manifold and population dynamics of a canonical cognitive circuit across waking and sleep”. In:Nature Neuroscience22.9 (Aug. 2019), pp. 1512–1520.issn: 1546-1726.doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0460-x.url:http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/s41593-019-0460-x

  17. [17]

    Memory in food-storing birds: from behaviour to brain

    Nicky S Clayton and John R Krebs. “Memory in food-storing birds: from behaviour to brain”. In:Current Opinion in Neurobiology5.2 (Apr. 1995), pp. 149–154.issn: 0959-4388.doi:10.1016/0959-4388(95)80020-4.url:http: //dx.doi.org/10.1016/0959-4388(95)80020-4

  18. [18]

    Understanding memory through hippocampal remap- ping

    Laura Lee Colgin, Edvard I. Moser, and May-Britt Moser. “Understanding memory through hippocampal remap- ping”. In:Trends in Neurosciences31.9 (Sept. 2008), pp. 469–477.issn: 0166-2236.doi:10.1016/j.tins.2008.06. 008.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2008.06.008

  19. [19]

    Synaptic Mechanisms and Network Dynamics Underlying Spatial Working Memory in a Cortical Net- work Model

    A. Compte. “Synaptic Mechanisms and Network Dynamics Underlying Spatial Working Memory in a Cortical Net- work Model”. In:Cerebral Cortex10.9 (Sept. 2000), pp. 910–923.issn: 1460-2199.doi:10.1093/cercor/10.9.910. url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/10.9.910

  20. [20]

    Abstract representations emerge in human hippocampal neurons during inference

    Hristos S. Courellis, Juri Minxha, Araceli R. Cardenas, Daniel L. Kimmel, Chrystal M. Reed, Taufik A. Valiante, C. Daniel Salzman, Adam N. Mamelak, Stefano Fusi, and Ueli Rutishauser. “Abstract representations emerge in human hippocampal neurons during inference”. In:Nature632.8026 (Aug. 2024), pp. 841–849.issn: 1476-4687.doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07799-x.u...

  21. [21]

    Dimensionality reduction for large-scale neural recordings

    John P Cunningham and Byron M Yu. “Dimensionality reduction for large-scale neural recordings”. In:Nature Neuroscience17.11 (Aug. 2014), pp. 1500–1509.issn: 1546-1726.doi:10.1038/nn.3776.url:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/nn.3776

  22. [22]

    Peter Dayan and L. F. Abbott.Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems. Computational Neuroscience Series. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.isbn: 9780262541855

  23. [23]

    Efficient codes and balanced networks

    Sophie Denève and Christian K Machens. “Efficient codes and balanced networks”. In:Nature Neuroscience19.3 (Feb. 2016), pp. 375–382.issn: 1546-1726.doi:10.1038/nn.4243.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.4243

  24. [24]

    Catastrophic forgetting in connectionist networks

    R French. “Catastrophic forgetting in connectionist networks”. In:Trends in Cognitive Sciences3.4 (Apr. 1999), pp. 128–135.issn: 1364-6613.doi:10.1016/s1364- 6613(99)01294- 2.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S1364-6613(99)01294-2

  25. [25]

    Cambouropoulos, M

    Stefano Fusi. “Memory Capacity of Neural Network Models”. In:The Oxford Handbook of Human Memory, Two Volume Pack. Oxford University Press, July 2024, pp. 740–764.isbn: 9780190918019.doi:10 . 1093 / oxfordhb / 9780190917982.013.26.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190917982.013.26. 11

  26. [26]

    Limits on the memory storage capacity of bounded synapses

    Stefano Fusi and L F Abbott. “Limits on the memory storage capacity of bounded synapses”. In:Nature Neuroscience 10.4 (Mar. 2007), pp. 485–493.issn: 1546-1726.doi:10.1038/nn1859.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn1859

  27. [27]

    Why neurons mix: high dimensionality for higher cognition

    Stefano Fusi, Earl K Miller, and Mattia Rigotti. “Why neurons mix: high dimensionality for higher cognition”. In: Current Opinion in Neurobiology37 (Apr. 2016), pp. 66–74.issn: 0959-4388.doi:10.1016/j.conb.2016.01.010. url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2016.01.010

  28. [28]

    Continental variation in relative hippocampal volume in birds: the phylogenetic extent of the effect and the potential role of winter temperatures

    László Zsolt Garamszegi and Jeffrey R Lucas. “Continental variation in relative hippocampal volume in birds: the phylogenetic extent of the effect and the potential role of winter temperatures”. In:Biology Letters1.3 (June 2005), pp. 330–333.issn: 1744-957X.doi:10.1098/rsbl.2005.0328.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2005. 0328

  29. [29]

    Context-dependent representations of objects and space in the primate hippocampus during virtual navigation

    Roberto A. Gulli, Lyndon R. Duong, Benjamin W. Corrigan, Guillaume Doucet, Sylvain Williams, Stefano Fusi, and Julio C. Martinez-Trujillo. “Context-dependent representations of objects and space in the primate hippocampus during virtual navigation”. In:Nature Neuroscience23.1 (Dec. 2019), pp. 103–112.issn: 1546-1726.doi:10.1038/ s41593-019-0548-3.url:http...

  30. [30]

    Environmental Boundaries as an Error Correction Mecha- nism for Grid Cells

    Kiah Hardcastle, Surya Ganguli, and Lisa M. Giocomo. “Environmental Boundaries as an Error Correction Mecha- nism for Grid Cells”. In:Neuron86.3 (May 2015), pp. 827–839.issn: 0896-6273.doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03. 039.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.039

  31. [31]

    Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities

    J J Hopfield. “Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.” In:Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences79.8 (Apr. 1982), pp. 2554–2558.issn: 1091-6490.doi:10.1073/pnas.79. 8.2554.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554

  32. [32]

    The Evolution of the Cognitive Map

    Lucia F. Jacobs. “The Evolution of the Cognitive Map”. In:Brain, Behavior and Evolution62.2 (2003), pp. 128–139. issn: 1421-9743.doi:10.1159/000072443.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000072443

  33. [33]

    Interpreting neural computations by examining intrinsic and embedding dimensionality of neural activity

    Mehrdad Jazayeri and Srdjan Ostojic. “Interpreting neural computations by examining intrinsic and embedding dimensionality of neural activity”. In:Current Opinion in Neurobiology70 (Oct. 2021), pp. 113–120.issn: 0959-4388. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2021.08.002.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2021.08.002

  34. [34]

    The molecular biology of memory storage: a dialogue between genes and synapses

    Eric R. Kandel. “The molecular biology of memory storage: a dialogue between genes and synapses”. In:Science 294.5544 (Nov. 2001), pp. 1030–1038

  35. [35]

    Kandel.In search of memory

    Eric R. Kandel.In search of memory. New York, NY: WW Norton, Mar. 2007.isbn: 978-0393329377

  36. [36]

    Kandel.Reductionism in art and brain science

    Eric R. Kandel.Reductionism in art and brain science. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, Aug. 2016.isbn: 978-0231179621

  37. [37]

    The Finale of Brahms’s Fourth Symphony: The Tale of the Subject

    Raymond Knapp. “The Finale of Brahms’s Fourth Symphony: The Tale of the Subject”. In:19th-Century Music13.1 (1989), pp. 3–17.issn: 0148-2076.doi:10.2307/746207.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/746207

  38. [38]

    Hippocampal specialization of food-storing birds

    J R Krebs, D F Sherry, S D Healy, V H Perry, and A L Vaccarino. “Hippocampal specialization of food-storing birds.” In:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences86.4 (Feb. 1989), pp. 1388–1392.issn: 1091-6490.doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.4.1388.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.86.4.1388

  39. [39]

    Representational similarity analysis – connecting the branches of systems neuroscience

    Nikolaus Kriegeskorte, Marieke Mur, and Peter Bandettini. “Representational similarity analysis – connecting the branches of systems neuroscience”. In:Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience(2008).issn: 1662-5137.doi:10 . 3389 / neuro.06.004.2008

  40. [40]

    A unifying perspective on neural manifolds and circuits for cognition

    Christopher Langdon, Mikhail Genkin, and Tatiana A. Engel. “A unifying perspective on neural manifolds and circuits for cognition”. In:Nature Reviews Neuroscience24.6 (Apr. 2023), pp. 363–377.issn: 1471-0048.doi:10 . 1038/s41583-023-00693-x.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41583-023-00693-x

  41. [41]

    Grid scale drives the scale and long- term stability of place maps

    Caitlin S. Mallory, Kiah Hardcastle, Jason S. Bant, and Lisa M. Giocomo. “Grid scale drives the scale and long- term stability of place maps”. In:Nature Neuroscience21.2 (Jan. 2018), pp. 270–282.issn: 1546-1726.doi:10.1038/ s41593-017-0055-3.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41593-017-0055-3

  42. [42]

    The Detection of Disease Clustering and a Generalized Regression Approach

    Nathan Mantel. “The Detection of Disease Clustering and a Generalized Regression Approach”. In:Cancer Research 27.2_Part_1 (Feb. 1967), pp. 209–220.issn: 0008-5472. eprint:https://aacrjournals.org/cancerres/article- pdf/27/2_Part_1/209/2382183/cr0272p10209.pdf

  43. [43]

    A Technique of Nonparametric Multivariate Analysis

    Nathan Mantel and Ranchhodbhai S. Valand. “A Technique of Nonparametric Multivariate Analysis”. In:Biometrics 26.3 (Sept. 1970), p. 547.issn: 0006-341X.doi:10.2307/2529108.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2529108

  44. [44]

    Simple memory: a theory for archicortex

    D. Marr. “Simple memory: a theory for archicortex”. In:Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences262.841 (July 1971), pp. 23–81.issn: 2054-0280.doi:10.1098/rstb.1971.0078.url:http: //dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1971.0078

  45. [45]

    Catastrophic Interference in Connectionist Networks: The Sequential Learning Problem

    Michael McCloskey and Neal J. Cohen. “Catastrophic Interference in Connectionist Networks: The Sequential Learning Problem”. In:Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Elsevier, 1989, pp. 109–165.isbn: 9780125433242. doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60536-8.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60536-8. 12

  46. [46]

    Hippocampal synaptic enhancement and information storage within a dis- tributed memory system

    B.L. McNaughton and R.G.M. Morris. “Hippocampal synaptic enhancement and information storage within a dis- tributed memory system”. In:Trends in Neurosciences10.10 (Jan. 1987), pp. 408–415.issn: 0166-2236.doi:10.1016/ 0166-2236(87)90011-7.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0166-2236(87)90011-7

  47. [47]

    Geometry and dynamics of representations in a precisely balanced memory network related to olfactory cortex

    Claire Meissner-Bernard, Friedemann Zenke, and Rainer W. Friedrich. “Geometry and dynamics of representations in a precisely balanced memory network related to olfactory cortex”. In:eLife(May 2024).doi:10.7554/elife. 96303.1.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.96303.1

  48. [48]

    Representational drift and learning-induced stabilization in the piriform cortex

    Guillermo B. Morales, Miguel A. Muñoz, and Yuhai Tu. “Representational drift and learning-induced stabilization in the piriform cortex”. In:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences122.29 (July 2025).issn: 1091-6490.doi: 10.1073/pnas.2501811122.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2501811122

  49. [49]

    Genre and the Finale of Brahms’s Fourth Symphony

    Robert Pascall. “Genre and the Finale of Brahms’s Fourth Symphony”. In:Music Analysis8.3 (Oct. 1989), p. 233.issn: 0262-5245.doi:10.2307/854289.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/854289

  50. [50]

    Hannah Payne, Galen Lynch, and Dmitriy Aronov.Neural representations of space in the hippocampus of a food- caching bird. en. 2021.doi:10.5061/DRYAD.PG4F4QRP7.url:https://datadryad.org/dataset/doi:10.5061/ dryad.pg4f4qrp7

  51. [51]

    Neural representations of space in the hippocampus of a food-caching bird

    Hannah L. Payne, Galen F. Lynch, and Dmitriy Aronov. “Neural representations of space in the hippocampus of a food-caching bird”. In:Science373.6552 (July 2021), pp. 343–348.issn: 1095-9203.doi:10.1126/science.abg2009. url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.abg2009

  52. [52]

    Environmental Influences on Spatial Memory and the Hippocampus in Food-Caching Chickadees

    Vladimir V. Pravosudov, Timothy C. Roth, Lara D. LaDage, and Cody A. Freas. “Environmental Influences on Spatial Memory and the Hippocampus in Food-Caching Chickadees”. In:Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews10 (2015), pp. 25–43.issn: 1911-4745.doi:10.3819/ccbr.2015.100002.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.3819/ccbr. 2015.100002

  53. [54]

    From Syntax to Semantics: Geometric Stability as the Missing Axis of Perturbation Biology

    Prashant C. Raju. “Geometric coherence of single-cell CRISPR perturbations reveals regulatory architecture and predicts cellular stress”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.00678(2026)

  54. [55]

    Geometric Stability: The Missing Axis of Representations

    Prashant C. Raju. “Geometric Stability: The Missing Axis of Representations”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.09173 (2026)

  55. [56]

    Recurrent circuitry stabilizes representational geometry across neural circuits

    Prashant C. Raju. “Recurrent circuitry stabilizes representational geometry across neural circuits”. In:Preprint(May 2026).doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9581425/v1.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9581425/v1

  56. [57]

    Raju.Shesha: Self-Consistency Metrics for Representational Stability

    Prashant C. Raju.Shesha: Self-Consistency Metrics for Representational Stability. 2026.doi:10 . 5281 / zenodo . 18227453.url:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18227453

  57. [58]

    The Geometric Canary: Predicting Steerability and Detecting Drift via Representational Stability

    Prashant C. Raju. “The Geometric Canary: Predicting Steerability and Detecting Drift via Representational Stabil- ity”. In:arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.17698(2026)

  58. [59]

    Space is a latent sequence: A theory of the hippocampus

    Rajkumar Vasudeva Raju, J. Swaroop Guntupalli, Guangyao Zhou, Carter Wendelken, Miguel Lázaro-Gredilla, and Dileep George. “Space is a latent sequence: A theory of the hippocampus”. In:Science Advances10.31 (Aug. 2024). issn: 2375-2548.doi:10.1126/sciadv.adm8470.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adm8470

  59. [60]

    Independence of Firing Correlates of Anatomically Proximate Hippocampal Pyramidal Cells

    A. D. Redish, F. P. Battaglia, M. K. Chawla, A. D. Ekstrom, J. L. Gerrard, P. Lipa, E. S. Rosenzweig, P. F. Worley, J. F. Guzowski, B. L. McNaughton, and C. A. Barnes. “Independence of Firing Correlates of Anatomically Proximate Hippocampal Pyramidal Cells”. In:The Journal of Neuroscience21.5 (Mar. 2001), RC134–RC134.issn: 1529-2401.doi: 10.1523/jneurosci...

  60. [61]

    The Asynchronous State in Cortical Circuits

    Alfonso Renart, Jaime de la Rocha, Peter Bartho, Liad Hollender, Néstor Parga, Alex Reyes, and Kenneth D. Harris. “The Asynchronous State in Cortical Circuits”. In:Science327.5965 (Jan. 2010), pp. 587–590.issn: 1095-9203.doi: 10.1126/science.1179850.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1179850

  61. [62]

    The importance of mixed selectivity in complex cognitive tasks

    Mattia Rigotti, Omri Barak, Melissa R. Warden, Xiao-Jing Wang, Nathaniel D. Daw, Earl K. Miller, and Stefano Fusi. “The importance of mixed selectivity in complex cognitive tasks”. In:Nature497.7451 (May 2013), pp. 585–590.issn: 1476-4687.doi:10.1038/nature12160.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12160

  62. [63]

    Oxford University Press

    Edmund T. Rolls and Alessandro Treves.Neural networks and brain function. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524328.001.0001.url:https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID: 14588175

  63. [64]

    Efficient Partitioning of Memory Systems and Its Importance for Memory Consoli- dation

    Alex Roxin and Stefano Fusi. “Efficient Partitioning of Memory Systems and Its Importance for Memory Consoli- dation”. In:PLoS Computational Biology9.7 (July 2013). Ed. by Jeff Beck, e1003146.issn: 1553-7358.doi:10.1371/ journal.pcbi.1003146.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003146. 13

  64. [65]

    If deep learning is the answer, what is the question?

    Andrew Saxe, Stephanie Nelli, and Christopher Summerfield. “If deep learning is the answer, what is the question?” In:Nature Reviews Neuroscience22.1 (Nov. 2020), pp. 55–67.issn: 1471-0048.doi:10.1038/s41583-020-00395-8. url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41583-020-00395-8

  65. [66]

    Hippocampus and memory for food caches in black-capped chickadees

    David F. Sherry and Anthony L. Vaccarino. “Hippocampus and memory for food caches in black-capped chickadees.” In:Behavioral Neuroscience103.2 (Apr. 1989), pp. 308–318.issn: 0735-7044.doi:10.1037/0735-7044.103.2.308. url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.103.2.308

  66. [67]

    The Hippocampal Complex of Food- Storing Birds

    David F. Sherry, Anthony L. Vaccarino, Karen Buckenham, and Rachel S. Herz. “The Hippocampal Complex of Food- Storing Birds”. In:Brain, Behavior and Evolution34.5 (1989), pp. 308–317.issn: 1421-9743.doi:10.1159/000116516. url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000116516

  67. [68]

    The Avian Hippocampal Formation and the Stress Response

    Tom V. Smulders. “The Avian Hippocampal Formation and the Stress Response”. In:Brain, Behavior and Evolution 90.1 (2017), pp. 81–91.issn: 1421-9743.doi:10.1159/000477654.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000477654

  68. [69]

    A unified theory for the computational and mechanistic origins of grid cells

    Ben Sorscher, Gabriel C. Mel, Samuel A. Ocko, Lisa M. Giocomo, and Surya Ganguli. “A unified theory for the computational and mechanistic origins of grid cells”. In:Neuron111.1 (Jan. 2023), 121–137.e13.issn: 0896-6273.doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.10.003.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2022.10.003

  69. [70]

    Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans

    Larry R. Squire. “Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans.” In: Psychological Review99.2 (1992), pp. 195–231.issn: 0033-295X.doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.2.195.url:http: //dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.2.195

  70. [71]

    Evidence for an Evolutionarily Conserved Memory Coding Scheme in the Mammalian Hippocampus

    Alexander Thome, Diano F. Marrone, Timothy M. Ellmore, Monica K. Chawla, Peter Lipa, Victor Ramirez-Amaya, Sarah H. Lisanby, Bruce L. McNaughton, and Carol A. Barnes. “Evidence for an Evolutionarily Conserved Memory Coding Scheme in the Mammalian Hippocampus”. In:The Journal of Neuroscience37.10 (Feb. 2017), pp. 2795–2801. issn: 1529-2401.doi:10.1523/jneu...

  71. [72]

    Long-term stability of the place-field activity of single units recorded from the dorsal hippocampus of freely behaving rats

    L.T. Thompson and P.J. Best. “Long-term stability of the place-field activity of single units recorded from the dorsal hippocampus of freely behaving rats”. In:Brain Research509.2 (Feb. 1990), pp. 299–308.issn: 0006-8993.doi:10. 1016/0006-8993(90)90555-p.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(90)90555-P

  72. [73]

    Computational analysis of the role of the hippocampus in memory

    Alessandro Treves and Edmund T. Rolls. “Computational analysis of the role of the hippocampus in memory”. In: Hippocampus4.3 (June 1994), pp. 374–391.issn: 1098-1063.doi:10.1002/hipo.450040319.url:http://dx.doi. org/10.1002/hipo.450040319

  73. [74]

    Memorization and Association on a Realistic Neural Model

    Leslie G. Valiant. “Memorization and Association on a Realistic Neural Model”. In:Neural Computation17.3 (Mar. 2005), pp. 527–555.issn: 1530-888X.doi:10 . 1162 / 0899766053019890.url:http : / / dx . doi . org / 10 . 1162 / 0899766053019890

  74. [75]

    The Hippocampus as a Stable Memory Allocator for Cortex

    Leslie G. Valiant. “The Hippocampus as a Stable Memory Allocator for Cortex”. In:Neural Computation24.11 (Nov. 2012), pp. 2873–2899.issn: 1530-888X.doi:10.1162/neco_a_00357.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/neco_ a_00357

  75. [76]

    Inhibitory Plasticity Balances Excitation and Inhibition in Sensory Pathways and Memory Networks

    T. P. Vogels, H. Sprekeler, F. Zenke, C. Clopath, and W. Gerstner. “Inhibitory Plasticity Balances Excitation and Inhibition in Sensory Pathways and Memory Networks”. In:Science334.6062 (Dec. 2011), pp. 1569–1573.issn: 1095- 9203.doi:10.1126/science.1211095.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1211095

  76. [77]

    Sparse Representa- tion in the Human Medial Temporal Lobe

    Stephen Waydo, Alexander Kraskov, Rodrigo Quian Quiroga, Itzhak Fried, and Christof Koch. “Sparse Representa- tion in the Human Medial Temporal Lobe”. In:The Journal of Neuroscience26.40 (Oct. 2006), pp. 10232–10234.issn: 1529-2401.doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2101- 06.2006.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2101- 06.2006. 14 A Methods A.1 Subjects and elec...