pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17287 · v1 · pith:7D7KEJBJnew · submitted 2026-05-17 · 💻 cs.CV

LISA: Language-guided Interference-aware Spatial-Frequency Attention for Driver Gaze Estimation

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 14:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords driver gaze estimationspatial-frequency attentionvision-language guidancefeature disentanglementfrequency domain fusionrobustness to lightingocclusion handlingocular region attention
0
0 comments X

The pith

Integrating stable frequency spectra with language-guided disentanglement improves driver gaze estimation under lighting changes and occlusions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a framework for estimating driver gaze direction that addresses failures in existing models caused by sudden lighting shifts, sensor noise, and visual distractions. It starts from the observation that the amplitude spectrum in the frequency domain holds steady even when spatial content is perturbed, allowing low-frequency semantic cues to anchor processing of finer details. Spatial attention then directs focus to the eye regions while a training strategy uses a frozen vision-language encoder plus orthogonal regularization to isolate gaze signals from appearance features. The result is stronger performance on standard benchmarks along with better handling of real-world interference. A sympathetic reader would care because reliable gaze tracking matters for safety systems that monitor driver attention in varying conditions.

Core claim

We propose LISA, which observes that the amplitude spectrum remains relatively stable even under spatial perturbations and designs a dual-domain fusion mechanism to integrate stable low-frequency semantics into high-frequency details while employing spatial attention to precisely target ocular regions. To reduce semantic ambiguity we introduce a training-time disentanglement strategy that uses a frozen CLIP encoder and orthogonal regularization to explicitly separate gaze features from appearance interference, achieving state-of-the-art performance on two benchmarks with significantly improved robustness against occlusions and lighting variations.

What carries the argument

Dual-domain fusion mechanism that merges stable low-frequency semantics from the amplitude spectrum into high-frequency details, combined with spatial attention for ocular targeting and language-guided orthogonal disentanglement of gaze from appearance.

If this is right

  • Gaze direction predictions become more reliable in driving scenes that contain sudden illumination shifts or partial face coverage.
  • Attention mechanisms can concentrate on ocular regions without being pulled toward unrelated appearance attributes.
  • Feature separation during training reduces confusion between true gaze cues and irrelevant visual attributes.
  • Overall accuracy rises on existing driver gaze benchmarks while robustness to common real-world disturbances increases.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same frequency-stability prior could be tested on other face-analysis tasks such as emotion recognition or head-pose estimation when lighting is inconsistent.
  • Extending the disentanglement step to video sequences might help maintain consistent gaze tracking across frames with changing conditions.
  • Applying the dual-domain idea to multi-camera driver monitoring setups could address cases where one view is occluded but another remains usable.

Load-bearing premise

The amplitude spectrum of face images stays relatively unchanged even when lighting, noise, or occlusions alter the spatial content.

What would settle it

Measure the change in amplitude spectrum across pairs of driver images that differ only by added lighting variation or occlusion, then check whether models without the frequency fusion lose accuracy exactly when that spectrum stability breaks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17287 by Huan Li, Jinpeng Chen, Jun Ma, Pei Zhang, Ruichen Zhou, Zhenye Yang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Visualizing the robustness gap. Left: Spatial features fail to align under lighting changes, while frequency spectra remain sta￾ble. Right: LISA enhances robustness by injecting frequency priors and employing a language-guided “Push Away” mechanism to sup￾press irrelevant semantic attributes. quency path of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of the LISA framework. The architecture consists of a ResNet-18 backbone extracting multi-scale features, a Feature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Error and sample distribution in gaze angle space. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Visualization of multi-resolution feature evolution. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Driver gaze estimation serves as a fundamental metric for evaluating driver attentiveness in modern monitoring systems. Beyond being vulnerable to sudden lighting changes and sensor noise, spatial-domain models struggle to disentangle authentic gaze cues from irrelevant visual attributes. In this paper, we propose LISA, a \textbf{L}anguage-guided \textbf{I}nterference-aware \textbf{S}patial-Frequency \textbf{A}ttention framework that combines frequency-domain priors with vision-language knowledge. Observing that the amplitude spectrum remains relatively stable even under spatial perturbations, we design a dual-domain fusion mechanism. It integrates stable low-frequency semantics into high-frequency details, employing spatial attention to precisely target ocular regions. To reduce semantic ambiguity, we also introduce a training-time disentanglement strategy. Using a frozen CLIP encoder and orthogonal regularization, we explicitly separate gaze features from appearance interference. Experiments on two benchmarks show that LISA achieves state-of-the-art performance, with significantly improved robustness against occlusions and lighting variations. The code repository is available at https://github.com/Mason-bupt/LISA.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes LISA, a Language-guided Interference-aware Spatial-Frequency Attention framework for driver gaze estimation. It observes that the amplitude spectrum remains relatively stable under spatial perturbations and designs a dual-domain fusion mechanism to integrate stable low-frequency semantics into high-frequency details, combined with spatial attention for ocular regions. A training-time disentanglement strategy using a frozen CLIP encoder and orthogonal regularization separates gaze features from appearance interference. Experiments on two benchmarks report state-of-the-art performance and significantly improved robustness against occlusions and lighting variations.

Significance. If the reported gains are attributable to the dual-domain fusion and disentanglement rather than post-hoc tuning, the work could advance robust gaze estimation for driver monitoring systems. The public code repository supports reproducibility, which strengthens the empirical contribution.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central justification for the dual-domain fusion mechanism is the observation that 'the amplitude spectrum remains relatively stable even under spatial perturbations,' yet no quantitative validation (e.g., spectrum correlation coefficients, invariance scores, or ablation on frequency stability under occlusions/lighting) is provided on the driver gaze benchmarks. This assumption is load-bearing for claiming that the fusion, rather than CLIP attention alone, drives the robustness improvements.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify in the methods section how the orthogonal regularization interacts with the frozen CLIP encoder to ensure the disentanglement is not simply inherited from the pre-trained model.
  2. Include error bars or statistical significance tests for the SOTA claims on the two benchmarks to allow assessment of whether gains exceed variance.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and the opportunity to clarify and strengthen the empirical grounding of our dual-domain fusion mechanism. We address the concern point by point below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central justification for the dual-domain fusion mechanism is the observation that 'the amplitude spectrum remains relatively stable even under spatial perturbations,' yet no quantitative validation (e.g., spectrum correlation coefficients, invariance scores, or ablation on frequency stability under occlusions/lighting) is provided on the driver gaze benchmarks. This assumption is load-bearing for claiming that the fusion, rather than CLIP attention alone, drives the robustness improvements.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract relies on this observation without accompanying quantitative metrics on the driver gaze benchmarks, and that such evidence would better isolate the contribution of the frequency fusion from the CLIP-guided spatial attention. The manuscript currently supports the observation with qualitative spectrum visualizations under perturbations (Section 3.2), but does not report numerical invariance scores or benchmark-specific ablations. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated quantitative analysis: (1) amplitude-spectrum correlation coefficients and invariance scores computed on the two driver gaze benchmarks under controlled occlusions and lighting changes; (2) an ablation that removes only the dual-domain fusion while retaining the CLIP attention and orthogonal regularization, to quantify its incremental robustness gain. These additions will be placed in the experiments section and referenced from the abstract. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on empirical motivation and standard components

full rationale

The paper motivates its dual-domain fusion from the stated observation that amplitude spectra remain stable under perturbations, then implements this via spatial-frequency attention, frozen CLIP, and orthogonal regularization. These are architectural choices whose claimed gains are presented as experimental outcomes on benchmarks rather than any definitional equivalence or fitted parameter renamed as prediction. No equations reduce the fusion mechanism to its inputs by construction, no self-citations are load-bearing for uniqueness or ansatz, and the central SOTA claim rests on reported results rather than tautological steps. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a small number of standard assumptions from computer vision and pre-trained models rather than many new free parameters or invented entities. The frequency stability observation functions as a domain assumption.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Amplitude spectrum remains relatively stable under spatial perturbations
    Invoked in the abstract to motivate the dual-domain fusion mechanism that integrates low-frequency semantics into high-frequency details.
  • domain assumption Frozen CLIP encoder provides useful semantic features for gaze disentanglement
    Used to reduce semantic ambiguity via training-time disentanglement strategy.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5725 in / 1493 out tokens · 47760 ms · 2026-05-20T14:41:45.775549+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    GazeGene: Large-scale synthetic gaze dataset with 3d eye- ball annotations

    [Baoet al., 2025 ] Yiwei Bao, Zhiming Wang, and Feng Lu. GazeGene: Large-scale synthetic gaze dataset with 3d eye- ball annotations. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 18749–18759,

  2. [2]

    Amplitude-phase re- combination: Rethinking robustness of convolutional neu- ral networks in frequency domain

    [Chenet al., 2021 ] Guangyao Chen, Peixi Peng, Li Ma, Jia Li, Lin Du, and Yonghong Tian. Amplitude-phase re- combination: Rethinking robustness of convolutional neu- ral networks in frequency domain. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 458–467,

  3. [3]

    Gaze esti- mation using transformer

    [Cheng and Lu, 2022] Yihua Cheng and Feng Lu. Gaze esti- mation using transformer. In2022 26th International Con- ference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), pages 3341–3347,

  4. [4]

    Puregaze: Purifying gaze feature for generalizable gaze estimation

    [Chenget al., 2022 ] Yihua Cheng, Yiwei Bao, and Feng Lu. Puregaze: Purifying gaze feature for generalizable gaze estimation. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Ar- tificial Intelligence, volume 36, pages 436–443,

  5. [5]

    3D prior is all you need: Cross- task few-shot 2d gaze estimation

    [Chenget al., 2025 ] Yihua Cheng, Hengfei Wang, Zhongqun Zhang, Yang Yue, Boeun Kim, Feng Lu, and Hyung Jin Chang. 3D prior is all you need: Cross- task few-shot 2d gaze estimation. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 23891–23900,

  6. [6]

    Freegaze: resource-efficient gaze estimation via frequency domain contrastive learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.06692,

    [Du and Lan, 2022] Lingyu Du and Guohao Lan. Freegaze: resource-efficient gaze estimation via frequency domain contrastive learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.06692,

  7. [7]

    L-tla: A lightweight driver distrac- tion detection method based on three-level attention mech- anisms.IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 73(4):1731– 1742,

    [Guoet al., 2024 ] Zizheng Guo, Qing Liu, Lin Zhang, Zhen- ning Li, and Guofa Li. L-tla: A lightweight driver distrac- tion detection method based on three-level attention mech- anisms.IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 73(4):1731– 1742,

  8. [8]

    Deep residual learning for image recog- nition

    [Heet al., 2016 ] Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recog- nition. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 770–778,

  9. [9]

    Context-aware driver attention estima- tion using multi-hierarchy saliency fusion with gaze track- ing.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Sys- tems, 25(8):8602–8614,

    [Huet al., 2024 ] Zhongxu Hu, Yuxin Cai, Qinghua Li, Kui Su, and Chen Lv. Context-aware driver attention estima- tion using multi-hierarchy saliency fusion with gaze track- ing.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Sys- tems, 25(8):8602–8614,

  10. [10]

    FIFA: Fine-grained inter-frame attention for driver’s video gaze estimation

    [Huet al., 2025 ] Daosong Hu, Mingyue Cui, and Kai Huang. FIFA: Fine-grained inter-frame attention for driver’s video gaze estimation. InProceedings of the Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 18760–18769,

  11. [11]

    Spatio-temporal attention and gaussian pro- cesses for personalized video gaze estimation

    [Jindalet al., 2024 ] Swati Jindal, Mohit Yadav, and Roberto Manduchi. Spatio-temporal attention and gaussian pro- cesses for personalized video gaze estimation. InProceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 604–614,

  12. [12]

    Look both ways: Self-supervising driver gaze estimation and road scene saliency

    [Kasaharaet al., 2022 ] Isaac Kasahara, Simon Stent, and Hyun Soo Park. Look both ways: Self-supervising driver gaze estimation and road scene saliency. InEuropean Con- ference on Computer Vision, pages 126–142,

  13. [13]

    GA3CE: Unconstrained 3d gaze estimation with gaze-aware 3d context encoding

    [Kawanaet al., 2025 ] Yuki Kawana, Shintaro Shiba, Quan Kong, and Norimasa Kobori. GA3CE: Unconstrained 3d gaze estimation with gaze-aware 3d context encoding. In Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion Conference, pages 3081–3090,

  14. [14]

    Gaze360: Physically unconstrained gaze estimation in the wild

    [Kellnhoferet al., 2019 ] Petr Kellnhofer, Adria Recasens, Simon Stent, Wojciech Matusik, and Antonio Torralba. Gaze360: Physically unconstrained gaze estimation in the wild. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international con- ference on computer vision, pages 6912–6921,

  15. [15]

    Appearance debiased gaze estimation via stochastic subject-wise adversarial learning.Pattern Recognition, 152:110441,

    [Kimet al., 2024 ] Suneung Kim, Woo-Jeoung Nam, and Seong-Whan Lee. Appearance debiased gaze estimation via stochastic subject-wise adversarial learning.Pattern Recognition, 152:110441,

  16. [16]

    Gaze estima- tion from color image based on the eye model with known head pose.IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Sys- tems, 46(3):414–423,

    [Li and Li, 2015] Jianfeng Li and Shigang Li. Gaze estima- tion from color image based on the eye model with known head pose.IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Sys- tems, 46(3):414–423,

  17. [17]

    [Liet al., 2024 ] Guofa Li, Guanglei Wang, Zizheng Guo, Qing Liu, Xiyuan Luo, Bangwei Yuan, Mingrui Li, and Lu Yang. Domain adaptive driver distraction detec- tion based on partial feature alignment and confusion- minimized classification.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 25(9):11227–11240,

  18. [18]

    Generalizing gaze estimation with outlier- guided collaborative adaptation

    [Liuet al., 2021 ] Yunfei Liu, Ruicong Liu, Haofei Wang, and Feng Lu. Generalizing gaze estimation with outlier- guided collaborative adaptation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 3835–3844,

  19. [19]

    Gaz- ing into missteps: Leveraging eye-gaze for unsupervised mistake detection in egocentric videos of skilled human activities

    [Mazzamutoet al., 2025 ] Michele Mazzamuto, Antonino Furnari, Yoichi Sato, and Giovanni Maria Farinella. Gaz- ing into missteps: Leveraging eye-gaze for unsupervised mistake detection in egocentric videos of skilled human activities. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition Conference, pages 8310–8320,

  20. [20]

    Deep learning for safe autonomous driving: Cur- rent challenges and future directions.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 22(7):4316–4336,

    [Muhammadet al., 2020 ] Khan Muhammad, Amin Ullah, Jaime Lloret, Javier Del Ser, and Victor Hugo C De Albu- querque. Deep learning for safe autonomous driving: Cur- rent challenges and future directions.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 22(7):4316–4336,

  21. [21]

    Learning transferable visual models from nat- ural language supervision

    [Radfordet al., 2021 ] Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agar- wal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from nat- ural language supervision. InInternational conference on machine learning, pages 8748–8763,

  22. [22]

    Driver gaze estimation in the real world: Overcoming the eyeglass challenge

    [Rangeshet al., 2020 ] Akshay Rangesh, Bowen Zhang, and Mohan M Trivedi. Driver gaze estimation in the real world: Overcoming the eyeglass challenge. In2020 IEEE Intelligent vehicles symposium (IV), pages 1054–1059. IEEE,

  23. [23]

    [Ryanet al., 2025 ] Fiona Ryan, Ajay Bati, Sangmin Lee, Daniel Bolya, Judy Hoffman, and James M. Rehg. Gaze- LLE: Gaze Target Estimation via Large-Scale Learned En- coders. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 28874–28884,

  24. [24]

    Enhancing 3D Gaze Estimation in the Wild using Weak Supervision with Gaze Following Labels

    [Vuillecard and Odobez, 2025] Pierre Vuillecard and Jean- Marc Odobez. Enhancing 3D Gaze Estimation in the Wild using Weak Supervision with Gaze Following Labels. In Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion Conference, pages 13508–13518,

  25. [25]

    De2Gaze: Deformable and decoupled representation learning for 3d gaze estimation

    [Xiaoet al., 2025 ] Yunfeng Xiao, Xiaowei Bai, Baojun Chen, Hao Su, Hao He, Liang Xie, and Erwei Yin. De2Gaze: Deformable and decoupled representation learning for 3d gaze estimation. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 3091–3100,

  26. [26]

    Driver gaze zone esti- mation via head pose fusion assisted supervision and eye region weighted encoding.IEEE Transactions on Con- sumer Electronics, 67(4):275–284,

    [Yanget al., 2021 ] Yirong Yang, Chunsheng Liu, Faliang Chang, Yansha Lu, and Hui Liu. Driver gaze zone esti- mation via head pose fusion assisted supervision and eye region weighted encoding.IEEE Transactions on Con- sumer Electronics, 67(4):275–284,

  27. [27]

    Lg-gaze: Learning geometry-aware continuous prompts for language-guided gaze estimation

    [Yinet al., 2024 ] Pengwei Yin, Jingjing Wang, Guanzhong Zeng, Di Xie, and Jiang Zhu. Lg-gaze: Learning geometry-aware continuous prompts for language-guided gaze estimation. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 1–17,

  28. [28]

    Vision-Guided Action: Enhancing 3d hu- man motion prediction with gaze-informed affordance in 3d scenes

    [Yuet al., 2025 ] Ting Yu, Yi Lin, Jun Yu, Zhenyu Lou, and Qiongjie Cui. Vision-Guided Action: Enhancing 3d hu- man motion prediction with gaze-informed affordance in 3d scenes. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition Conference, pages 12335–12346,

  29. [29]

    Appearance-based gaze esti- mation in the wild

    [Zhanget al., 2015 ] Xucong Zhang, Yusuke Sugano, Mario Fritz, and Andreas Bulling. Appearance-based gaze esti- mation in the wild. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4511– 4520,

  30. [30]

    Mpiigaze: Real-world dataset and deep appearance-based gaze estimation.IEEE trans- actions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 41(1):162–175,

    [Zhanget al., 2017 ] Xucong Zhang, Yusuke Sugano, Mario Fritz, and Andreas Bulling. Mpiigaze: Real-world dataset and deep appearance-based gaze estimation.IEEE trans- actions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 41(1):162–175,

  31. [31]

    Eth-xgaze: A large scale dataset for gaze estimation un- der extreme head pose and gaze variation

    [Zhanget al., 2020 ] Xucong Zhang, Seonwook Park, Thabo Beeler, Derek Bradley, Siyu Tang, and Otmar Hilliges. Eth-xgaze: A large scale dataset for gaze estimation un- der extreme head pose and gaze variation. InEuropean conference on computer vision, pages 365–381, 2020