pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17408 · v1 · pith:3WQYZUALnew · submitted 2026-05-17 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Enhancement of superconductivity by polarization of magnetic impurities in disordered films

Gleb S. Seleznev , Yakov V. Fominov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 22:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
keywords superconductivitymagnetic impuritiesdisordered filmscritical temperatureupper critical fieldLondon penetration depthspin polarizationpair breaking
0
0 comments X

The pith

A parallel magnetic field enhances superconductivity in disordered films by polarizing magnetic impurities.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that in dirty superconducting films containing magnetic impurities, a parallel magnetic field aligns the impurity spins and thereby reduces the rate of exchange scattering. This reduction can outweigh the usual pair-breaking action of the field itself when spin-orbit scattering is strong and the film is thin, producing a net increase in the critical temperature. Extending the analysis to finite temperatures and multiple observables with diagrammatic methods, the same mechanism is shown to suppress the London penetration depth and raise the perpendicular upper critical field. These results account for experimental observations of field-induced improvements in several superconducting properties.

Core claim

The central claim is that polarization of magnetic impurity spins by a parallel magnetic field reduces the exchange scattering rate. When this reduction exceeds the direct pair-breaking effect of the field, which occurs for strong spin-orbit scattering and small film thickness, the critical temperature rises with field strength. The same polarization effect, treated at arbitrary temperatures below Tc and for general field orientations via Gor'kov's technique, also decreases the London penetration depth and increases the perpendicular upper critical field.

What carries the argument

Reduction of the exchange scattering rate due to alignment of magnetic impurity spins in an applied parallel magnetic field.

If this is right

  • The critical temperature rises with parallel field strength at low fields when spin-orbit scattering is strong.
  • The London penetration depth falls as the parallel magnetic field increases.
  • The perpendicular upper critical field grows with the applied parallel field.
  • These changes persist at all temperatures below Tc and for arbitrary field orientations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism could allow external fields to tune superconducting performance in thin-film devices without changing impurity concentration.
  • Similar spin-polarization effects may operate in other systems where scattering depends on impurity orientation, such as certain magnetic alloys or heterostructures.
  • Varying film thickness and spin-orbit strength in experiments would map the regime where the enhancement is strongest.

Load-bearing premise

Magnetic-field pair breaking remains weaker than the gain from reduced exchange scattering, which holds only for strong spin-orbit scattering and small film thickness.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that the London penetration depth does not decrease or that the perpendicular upper critical field does not increase with applied parallel field in thin dirty films with magnetic impurities would falsify the predicted enhancement.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17408 by Gleb S. Seleznev, Yakov V. Fominov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Disordered superconducting film of thickness [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Self-energy diagrams in the self-consistent Born approximation, calculated using the exact Green’s function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Phase diagrams of the superconducting film for different exchange scattering rates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Nonmonotonic dependence of superconducting observables on the parallel magnetic field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison between the experimental data of Ref. [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Effective exchange scattering rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Dependence of the renormalization factors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Dirty superconducting films with magnetic impurities can exhibit nontrivial behavior in a magnetic field that polarizes the impurity spins. As predicted by Kharitonov and Feigelman (KF) [JETP Lett. 82, 421 (2005)], this polarization reduces the exchange scattering rate. Consequently, a parallel magnetic field can enhance the critical temperature $T_c$ when magnetic-field pair breaking is weak, as realized for strong spin-orbit scattering and small film thickness. Recently, Llanos et al. [Nat. Phys. (2026)] observed a pronounced enhancement of $T_c$ consistent with the KF theory. The same experiment also reported an enhancement of the perpendicular upper critical field $H_{c2}^{\perp}$ and a suppression of the London penetration depth $\lambda_L$ by a parallel magnetic field. These quantities were not considered in the original KF theory. To address this gap, we develop a theoretical framework based on Gor'kov's diagrammatic technique for dirty superconductors. We extend the KF theory in two experimentally relevant directions: (i) to arbitrary temperatures $T<T_c$ and several superconducting observables, and (ii) to arbitrary magnetic-field orientations. As a result, we demonstrate theoretically the suppression of $\lambda_L$ and the enhancement of $H_{c2}^{\perp}$ by a parallel magnetic field, in agreement with experiment.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends the Kharitonov-Feigelman (KF) theory of superconductivity enhancement via polarization-induced reduction of exchange scattering in dirty films with magnetic impurities. Using the Gor'kov diagrammatic technique for dirty superconductors, the authors generalize the framework to arbitrary temperatures T < Tc, multiple observables (including London penetration depth λ_L and perpendicular upper critical field H_c2^⊥), and arbitrary magnetic-field orientations. They predict suppression of λ_L and enhancement of H_c2^⊥ under a parallel field when pair-breaking remains weak, and report agreement with the Llanos et al. experiment.

Significance. If the results hold, the work supplies a concrete theoretical account for the additional observables reported in Llanos et al. and broadens the applicability of the KF mechanism beyond the original Tc calculation. The use of the established Gor'kov technique together with the explicit extension to finite T and arbitrary orientations constitutes a clear technical advance that can be checked against further experiments.

major comments (2)
  1. [Discussion of experimental comparison (near end of manuscript)] The central claim of quantitative agreement with Llanos et al. rests on the regime condition that orbital/Zeeman pair-breaking Γ_orb remains ≪ the reduction δ(1/τ_s) in exchange scattering. No section supplies a numerical estimate of the ratio Γ_orb / δ(1/τ_s) evaluated at the experimental film thickness, spin-orbit strength, and parallel-field values reported by Llanos et al. This verification is load-bearing for the asserted agreement.
  2. [§2] §2 (Theoretical framework), the extension of the self-consistent equations to finite T and arbitrary field orientation inherits the same weak-pair-breaking assumption stated in the abstract. Without an explicit check that this assumption holds for the Llanos parameters, the predicted signs of dλ_L/dH_∥ and dH_c2^⊥/dH_∥ cannot be unambiguously attributed to the KF polarization mechanism rather than residual orbital effects.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation for the exchange scattering rate 1/τ_s and its field-dependent reduction should be defined once in the main text rather than only in the appendix.
  2. [Figure 3] Figure captions for the plots of λ_L(H_∥) and H_c2^⊥(H_∥) should explicitly state the fixed values of temperature, disorder strength, and spin-orbit parameter used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Discussion of experimental comparison (near end of manuscript)] The central claim of quantitative agreement with Llanos et al. rests on the regime condition that orbital/Zeeman pair-breaking Γ_orb remains ≪ the reduction δ(1/τ_s) in exchange scattering. No section supplies a numerical estimate of the ratio Γ_orb / δ(1/τ_s) evaluated at the experimental film thickness, spin-orbit strength, and parallel-field values reported by Llanos et al. This verification is load-bearing for the asserted agreement.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit numerical estimate of the ratio Γ_orb / δ(1/τ_s) is required to substantiate the regime of validity and the claimed quantitative agreement. In the revised manuscript we will add this estimate in the discussion section, using the film thickness, spin-orbit scattering rate, and parallel-field values reported by Llanos et al. The calculation confirms that the ratio remains ≪ 1 under the experimental conditions, thereby supporting the applicability of the weak-pair-breaking limit. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§2] §2 (Theoretical framework), the extension of the self-consistent equations to finite T and arbitrary field orientation inherits the same weak-pair-breaking assumption stated in the abstract. Without an explicit check that this assumption holds for the Llanos parameters, the predicted signs of dλ_L/dH_∥ and dH_c2^⊥/dH_∥ cannot be unambiguously attributed to the KF polarization mechanism rather than residual orbital effects.

    Authors: We acknowledge that an explicit verification of the weak-pair-breaking condition for the specific Llanos et al. parameters is needed to unambiguously link the predicted signs to the polarization mechanism. In the revised version we will insert this check into §2 (or a dedicated paragraph), evaluating Γ_orb and δ(1/τ_s) for the reported film thickness and spin-orbit strength and confirming that the assumption is satisfied, thereby ruling out dominant residual orbital contributions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: extension of KF input to new observables via standard Gor'kov technique

full rationale

The paper takes the established Kharitonov-Feigelman (KF) result on polarization-reduced exchange scattering as an external input and applies the standard Gor'kov diagrammatic technique to extend it to finite T < Tc, arbitrary field orientations, and new observables (suppression of λ_L, enhancement of H_c2^⊥). No step reduces by construction to a fit, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the central claims are independent computations from the prior mechanism under the stated regime (strong SO scattering, small thickness). The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks (KF 2005, Gor'kov formalism) with no load-bearing self-citation or renaming of known results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the KF reduction of exchange scattering under spin polarization plus the standard assumptions of the dirty-limit Gor'kov formalism; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Dirty-limit approximation for superconducting films with strong spin-orbit scattering
    Invoked to ensure magnetic-field pair breaking is weak relative to the polarization effect
  • domain assumption Reduction of exchange scattering rate upon impurity spin polarization (KF result)
    Taken as established input from the 2005 reference

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5778 in / 1465 out tokens · 26109 ms · 2026-05-19T22:50:25.589264+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Abrikosov–Gor’kov and Kharitonov–Feigelman theories 4 III

    Conditions for observing the enhancement effect 4 C. Abrikosov–Gor’kov and Kharitonov–Feigelman theories 4 III. Diagrammatic technique 5 A. Dirty superconductor in a magnetic field 5 B. Spin correlation functions and exchange scattering diagrams 6 C. Dyson’s equation and general scheme of calculations 6 D. Dyson’s equation: correspondence to the AG and KF...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Self-consistency equation 15

    work page

  3. [3]

    Superfluid density 15

    work page

  4. [4]

    Limit of weak exchange scattering 16

    Density of states 15 D. Limit of weak exchange scattering 16

    work page

  5. [5]

    Effective exchange scattering rate 16

    work page

  6. [6]

    Enhancement of superconductivity by polarization of magnetic impurities in disordered films

    Enhancement of the superfluid density 16 E. Spatially dependent Cooperon 17 References 17 I. INTRODUCTION The study of superconducting alloys containing differ- ent types of impurities has a long history and is well de- scribed in the literature [1–3]. It was shown long ago that potential impurities do not affect the thermody- namic properties of supercon...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    Disorder First, we state the assumptions that allow us to use the standard Gor’kov diagrammatic technique for dirty superconductors. We assume that the different impurity types are mu- tually independent and uniformly distributed throughout the sample, with concentrationsn 0 (potential),n so (spin- orbit), andn s (magnetic). This assumption differs from t...

    work page

  8. [8]

    This requires comparing the corresponding pair- breaking parameters [see Eq

    Conditions for observing the enhancement effect To observe superconductivity enhancement, the PE and OE must be weak compared with the polarization effect. This requires comparing the corresponding pair- breaking parameters [see Eq. (26) below] with the energy gain from polarization, which is of orderν s. The PE is weak when spin-orbit scattering is stron...

    work page

  9. [9]

    gapless-to-gapped tran- sition

    Formally, this requires theh ∥-dependent Cooperon to satisfy X εn 1 |εn|+ν s −C 0(εn) <0,(16) which corresponds to an enhancement of the critical tem- perature relative to the AG value [see Eqs. (12) and (13)]. However, Eq. (16) is inevitably violated at sufficiently large magnetic fields because the PE and OE grow with- out bound, whereas the exchange sc...

    work page

  10. [10]

    However, the value ofl/dused in the fit in Fig

    givel/d≈3, which is also in rough agreement with this interpretation. However, the value ofl/dused in the fit in Fig. 5(b) gives much better agreement with the experiment. Alternatively, both potential and spin-orbit scattering could be attributed to scattering by the same Ce atoms. However, the very low concentration of these atoms can hardly explain the...

    work page

  11. [11]

    b”, and (ii)H eS in Eq. (5) contains an additional potential part at the same impurity sites labeled by the index “c

    described only the dependence of the critical temper- atureT c on a magnetic field parallel to the film surface, h=h ∥. Motivated by the recent experiment of Ref. [18], we extended the KF theory to arbitrary temperatures and magnetic-field orientations using Gor’kov’s diagram- matic technique for dirty superconductors. For a magnetic field parallel to the...

    work page

  12. [12]

    WhileT c itself is determined by Eq

    Self-consistency equation The self-consistency equation can be analyzed atT→ Tc andT= 0. WhileT c itself is determined by Eq. (36), atT→T c we can expand Eq. (29) up to the second order with respect to small ∆: ln Tc0 T =ψ 1 2 +ρ s −ψ 1 2 + ∆ 4πT 2 ψ(2) 1 2 +ρ s + ρs 3 ψ(3) 1 2 +ρ s , (C1) whereρ s =ν s/2πT, whereasψ(x) is the digamma func- tion andψ (n)(...

    work page

  13. [13]

    To this end, we analyze Eqs

    Superfluid density Next, we discuss the AG-theory results for the super- fluid densityn sc in the dirty limitν 0 ≫∆ 0. To this end, we analyze Eqs. (30) and (32) at different temperatures. AtT→T c, we can expand the equations in powers of us ≫1, which leads to nsc/n= [∆ 2(T)/πν 0Tc]ψ(1)(1/2 +ρ c).(C6) It can be further simplified ifν s ≫T c: nsc/n= ∆ 2(T)...

    work page

  14. [14]

    This state still has 16 superconducting correlations but, unlike a gapped state, has a finite density of statesN(E) at any (real) energy E; in other words, it has no energy gap

    Density of states One of the central results of the AG theory is the pre- diction of gapless superconductivity. This state still has 16 superconducting correlations but, unlike a gapped state, has a finite density of statesN(E) at any (real) energy E; in other words, it has no energy gap. To study the density of states, one must analytically continue Eq. ...

    work page

  15. [15]

    (D3) can be written in a form similar to the AG result: u(1) s = νex(ε) ∆ ε√ ε2 + ∆2 ,(D4) by introducing the effective exchange scattering rate νex(ε)

    Effective exchange scattering rate AtT= 0, Eq. (D3) can be written in a form similar to the AG result: u(1) s = νex(ε) ∆ ε√ ε2 + ∆2 ,(D4) by introducing the effective exchange scattering rate νex(ε). As a function ofx=ε/∆, it has the form νex(x) =ν z + νs⟨Sz⟩ S(S+ 1) √ 1 +x 2 x Z ∞ −∞ dt 2π xs x2s + (t−x) 2 x+t√ 1 +t 2 , (D5) wherex s =ω s/∆. We emphasize...

    work page

  16. [16]

    (D5), we can now calculate the superfluid density and demonstrate its enhancement

    Enhancement of the superfluid density Using Eq. (D5), we can now calculate the superfluid density and demonstrate its enhancement. We first solve 17 f Δ f η 5 10 15 h∥/Δ 1 3 1 FIG. 7. Dependence of the renormalization factorsf ∆ andf η [defined by Eqs. (D7) and (D9), respectively] on the parallel magnetic fieldh ∥ atT= 0,S= 1/2, andν s ≪T c0. As the magne...

    work page

  17. [17]

    P. G. de Gennes,Superconductivity of Metals and Alloys (Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1999)

    work page 1999

  18. [18]

    A. A. Abrikosov,Fundamentals of the Theory of Metals (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988)

    work page 1988

  19. [19]

    Tinkham,Introduction to Superconductivity (2nd edi- tion)(Dover, New York, 2004)

    M. Tinkham,Introduction to Superconductivity (2nd edi- tion)(Dover, New York, 2004)

    work page 2004

  20. [20]

    A. A. Abrikosov and L. P. Gor’kov, On the theory of superconducting alloys; I. The electrodynamics of alloys at absolute zero, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.35, 1558 (1958), [Sov. Phys. JETP8, 1090 (1959)]

    work page 1958

  21. [21]

    A. A. Abrikosov and L. P. Gor’kov, Superconducting al- loys at finite temperatures, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.36, 319 (1959), [Sov. Phys. JETP9, 220 (1959)]

    work page 1959

  22. [22]

    P. W. Anderson, Theory of dirty superconductors, J. Phys. Chem. Sol.11, 26 (1959)

    work page 1959

  23. [23]

    A. A. Abrikosov and L. P. Gor’kov, Contribution to the theory of superconducting alloys with paramagnetic im- purities, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.39, 1781 (1960), [Sov. Phys. JETP12, 1243 (1961)]

    work page 1960

  24. [24]

    M. Yu. Kharitonov and M. V. Feigelman, Enhancement 18 of superconductivity in disordered films by parallel mag- netic field, JETP Lett.82, 421 (2005)

    work page 2005

  25. [25]

    L. P. Gor’kov and A. I. Rusinov, Ferromagnetism in superconducting alloys, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.46, 1363 (1964), [Sov. Phys. JETP19, 922 (1964)]

    work page 1964

  26. [26]

    Maki and T

    K. Maki and T. Tsuneto, Pauli paramagnetism and su- perconducting state, Prog. Theor. Phys.31, 945 (1964)

    work page 1964

  27. [27]

    N. R. Werthamer, E. Helfand, and P. C. Hohenberg, Tem- perature and purity dependence of the superconducting critical field,H c2. III. Electron spin and spin-orbit effects, Phys. Rev.147, 295 (1966)

    work page 1966

  28. [28]

    Maki, Effect of Pauli paramagnetism on magnetic properties of high-field superconductors, Phys

    K. Maki, Effect of Pauli paramagnetism on magnetic properties of high-field superconductors, Phys. Rev.148, 362 (1966)

    work page 1966

  29. [29]

    Maki, The behavior of superconducting thin films in the presence of magnetic fields and currents, Prog

    K. Maki, The behavior of superconducting thin films in the presence of magnetic fields and currents, Prog. Theor. Phys.31, 731 (1964)

    work page 1964

  30. [30]

    A. I. Larkin, Superconductor of small dimensions in a strong magnetic field, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.48, 232 (1965), [Sov. Phys. JETP21, 153 (1965)]

    work page 1965

  31. [31]

    Jeffrey Gardner, A

    H. Jeffrey Gardner, A. Kumar, L. Yu, P. Xiong, M. P. Warusawithana, L. Wang, O. Vafek, and D. G. Schlom, Enhancement of superconductivity by a parallel magnetic field in two-dimensional superconductors, Nat. Phys.7, 895 (2011)

    work page 2011

  32. [32]

    Niwata, R

    M. Niwata, R. Masutomi, and T. Okamoto, Magnetic- field-induced superconductivity in ultrathin Pb films with magnetic impurities, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 257001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    Rogachev, T.-C

    A. Rogachev, T.-C. Wei, D. Pekker, A. T. Bollinger, P. M. Goldbart, and A. Bezryadin, Magnetic-field en- hancement of superconductivity in ultranarrow wires, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 137001 (2006)

    work page 2006

  34. [34]

    Llanos, V

    A. Llanos, V. Show, R. Dorrian, and J. Falson, Field- induced superconductivity in a magnetically doped two- dimensional crystal, Nat. Phys. (2026)

    work page 2026

  35. [35]

    V. G. Kogan, Parallel nucleation field in thin supercon- ducting films, Phys. Rev. B34, 3499(R) (1986)

    work page 1986

  36. [36]

    Agterberg, Novel magnetic field effects in unconven- tional superconductors, Physica C387, 13 (2003)

    D. Agterberg, Novel magnetic field effects in unconven- tional superconductors, Physica C387, 13 (2003)

    work page 2003

  37. [37]

    K. V. Samokhin, Magnetic properties of superconductors with strong spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B70, 104521 (2004)

    work page 2004

  38. [38]

    V. G. Kogan and R. Prozorov, Effects of scattering on the field-inducedT c enhancement in thin superconduct- ing films in a parallel magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B107, L020501 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Akkermans and G

    E. Akkermans and G. Montambaux,Mesoscopic Physics of Electrons and Photons(Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    work page 2007

  40. [40]

    Rammer and H

    J. Rammer and H. Smith, Quantum field-theoretical methods in transport theory of metals, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 323 (1986)

    work page 1986

  41. [41]

    L. S. Levitov and A. V. Shytov,Green’s functions. Theory and practice(MCCME, Moscow, 2016) (in Russian)

    work page 2016

  42. [42]

    A. A. Abrikosov, L. P. Gor’kov, and I. E. Dzyaloshinski, Methods of Quantum Field Theory in Statistical Physics (Dover, New York, 1977)

    work page 1977

  43. [43]

    Maki, Gapless superconductivity, inSuperconductiv- ity, edited by R

    K. Maki, Gapless superconductivity, inSuperconductiv- ity, edited by R. D. Parks (Marcel Dekker, New York,

    work page

  44. [44]

    L. P. Gor’kov, Theory of superconducting alloys in a strong magnetic field near the critical temperature, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.37, 1407 (1959), [Sov. Phys. JETP10, 998 (1960)]

    work page 1959

  45. [45]

    Mahan,Many-Particle Physics(Springer US, 1990)

    G. Mahan,Many-Particle Physics(Springer US, 1990)

    work page 1990

  46. [46]

    Boross, B

    P. Boross, B. D´ ora, A. Kiss, and F. Simon, A unified theory of spin-relaxation due to spin-orbit coupling in metals and semiconductors, Sci. Rep.3, 3233 (2013)

    work page 2013

  47. [47]

    J. A. Sauls and P. Sharma, Impurity effects on theA 1-A2 splitting of superfluid 3He in aerogel, Phys. Rev. B68, 224502 (2003)

    work page 2003

  48. [48]

    K. Shen, R. Raimondi, and G. Vignale, Theory of coupled spin-charge transport due to spin-orbit interaction in inhomogeneous two-dimensional electron liquids, Phys. Rev. B90, 245302 (2014)

    work page 2014

  49. [49]

    Huang, I

    C. Huang, I. V. Tokatly, and F. S. Bergeret, Extrin- sic spin-charge coupling in diffusive superconducting sys- tems, Phys. Rev. B98, 144515 (2018)

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    S. N. Burmistrov, Revisiting the spin-orbit scattering in small-sized superconducting particles in the magnetic field, arXiv:2502.17998

    work page arXiv