pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17555 · v1 · pith:PV3J54T5new · submitted 2026-05-17 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.CV

PFlow-T: A Persistence-Driven Forward Process for Topology-Controlled Generation

Snigdha Chandan Khilar This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 13:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.CV
keywords persistent homologygenerative modelsdiffusion modelsBetti numberstopology controlforward processMNIST
0
0 comments X

The pith

PFlow-T replaces Gaussian noise with a persistent homology forward process that eliminates topological features based on their persistence.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces PFlow-T to fix the mismatch in topology-aware diffusion models where Gaussian noise corrupts data but structural recovery relies on separate conditional channels. Its forward process defines time as the gradual destruction of H1 features such as holes, removing them in order of persistence rather than adding random noise. The reverse network then inverts this ordered corruption directly to recover the clean image in one step. On MNIST images of digits zero, one, and eight the model produces samples with user-specified Betti numbers more reliably than a baseline and maintains performance on out-of-distribution cases. A sympathetic reader would care because the corruption and recovery steps now operate on the same structural information.

Core claim

PFlow-T bases its forward process entirely on persistent homology. Time measures the destruction of H1 topological features like holes rather than Gaussian noise injection. This forward process eliminates features based on their persistence. The reverse network then directly inverts this structured corruption to predict the clean state in one step.

What carries the argument

The persistence-driven forward process, which eliminates H1 topological features according to their persistence values.

Load-bearing premise

The reverse network can directly invert the persistence-based structured corruption to predict the clean state in one step.

What would settle it

Evaluating generated MNIST digits zero, one, and eight for exact match to requested Betti numbers or comparing out-of-distribution performance against the baseline; failure to show improvement would challenge the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17555 by Snigdha Chandan Khilar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: In-distribution β1 match rates. The gap widens with the topological complexity of the target. 6.3 Out-of-distribution controllability A model that scores well on the previous experiment might be cheating in a subtle way: maybe it has just learned the marginal distribution of digit classes, and the conditioning image’s β1 is a strong clue to what digit class to produce. To rule this out, the out-of-distribu… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Qualitative comparison. Rows cycle in groups of three: target image (top), PFlow-T [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Out-of-distribution controllability. We measure whether the generated image’s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Current topology aware diffusion models face an architectural mismatch by using Gaussian noise for corruption while recovering structural features through conditional side channels To fix this we introduce PFlow T a generative model that bases its forward process entirely on persistent homology In PFlow T time measures the destruction of H1 topological features like holes rather than Gaussian noise injection This forward process eliminates features based on their persistence The reverse network then directly inverts this structured corruption to predict the clean state in one step Tests on MNIST digits zero one and eight show PFlow T significantly outperforms a baseline model in generating requested Betti numbers and handling out of distribution tasks PFlow T is the first generative architecture using persistent homology for the forward process although we note it is currently limited to low resolution pixel space proxies

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces PFlow-T, a generative model whose forward process is defined entirely via persistent homology: time indexes the progressive elimination of H1 topological features (holes) ordered by persistence rather than Gaussian noise addition. The reverse network is trained to invert this structured corruption directly in a single forward pass, enabling generation conditioned on requested Betti numbers. Experiments restricted to MNIST digits 0, 1 and 8 report that PFlow-T outperforms a baseline in matching target Betti numbers and in out-of-distribution tasks; the method is noted to be currently limited to low-resolution pixel-space proxies.

Significance. If the one-step inversion of the persistence-driven corruption can be shown to be reliable and generalizable, the approach would address the noted architectural mismatch in topology-aware diffusion models by embedding persistent homology directly into the forward process, offering a potential route to topology control without auxiliary conditional channels. The current evidence, however, is confined to three specific low-resolution digits and does not yet establish broader applicability or robustness.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3: the central claim that the reverse network 'directly inverts this structured corruption to predict the clean state in one step' is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no explicit form of the forward operator, no auxiliary tracking field for component identities, and no demonstration that the persistence filtration (sublevel sets on pixel intensities) remains invertible when the target Betti number differs from that of the input image.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that PFlow-T 'significantly outperforms a baseline model in generating requested Betti numbers' is presented without quantitative metrics, error bars, ablation studies, or implementation details of either the baseline or the persistence elimination schedule, leaving the empirical support for the topology-control claim weakly substantiated.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains minor phrasing issues (e.g., 'digits zero one and eight' lacks commas and the final sentence on limitations could be more precise about the scope of the pixel-space proxy).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback on our manuscript. The comments help clarify key aspects of the forward process and strengthen the empirical presentation. We respond point by point to the major comments and indicate the revisions we will incorporate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3: the central claim that the reverse network 'directly inverts this structured corruption to predict the clean state in one step' is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no explicit form of the forward operator, no auxiliary tracking field for component identities, and no demonstration that the persistence filtration (sublevel sets on pixel intensities) remains invertible when the target Betti number differs from that of the input image.

    Authors: We agree that greater mathematical precision is needed. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit definition of the forward operator in §3: time t indexes a persistence filtration in which H1 features are removed in strictly decreasing order of persistence, with the corrupted image at step t obtained by thresholding the sublevel sets accordingly. No auxiliary tracking field is required because the filtration is recomputed globally from pixel intensities at each step; component identities are not preserved across time and the network is trained to regress directly to the clean image. Regarding invertibility under a changed target Betti number, the training regime already exposes the network to a range of persistence thresholds that produce different Betti numbers, and the one-step predictor is optimized for this mapping. We nevertheless acknowledge that a formal invertibility argument or exhaustive verification for arbitrary Betti mismatches is absent; we will add a dedicated limitations paragraph discussing this point and its implications for future work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that PFlow-T 'significantly outperforms a baseline model in generating requested Betti numbers' is presented without quantitative metrics, error bars, ablation studies, or implementation details of either the baseline or the persistence elimination schedule, leaving the empirical support for the topology-control claim weakly substantiated.

    Authors: We accept that the abstract claim requires quantitative backing. The revised abstract will report concrete figures (e.g., Betti-number match rate of 87.3 % ± 1.2 % for PFlow-T versus 61.4 % ± 2.8 % for the conditional diffusion baseline, averaged over five independent runs) together with the precise definition of the persistence elimination schedule (linear interpolation between the maximum and minimum persistence values observed on the training set). Implementation details of the baseline and the ablation experiments on schedule variants will be moved into the main text or a new supplementary section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: forward process uses independent persistent homology; reverse learns inversion from data

full rationale

The paper's derivation defines the forward process via external persistent homology computations that progressively eliminate H1 features ordered by persistence, with time indexing feature destruction rather than noise. The reverse network is then trained to invert this structured corruption and predict the clean image in one step, with claims supported by MNIST experiments on digits 0/1/8 showing improved Betti number control. No equation or central claim reduces the result to a fitted input renamed as prediction, a self-definitional loop, or a load-bearing self-citation chain; the topology is computed independently of the model parameters, and the one-step inversion is a learned mapping validated externally rather than assumed by construction. This matches the standard non-circular setup for structured generative models.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that persistent homology supplies a structured, invertible corruption schedule for images; no free parameters or new entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • persistence elimination schedule
    The ordering and timing of feature destruction by persistence likely requires a schedule or threshold that is chosen or tuned for the model.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Persistent homology can be used to measure and order the destruction of topological features in images to define a meaningful forward corruption process.
    This underpins the replacement of Gaussian noise with persistence-driven elimination.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5650 in / 1306 out tokens · 57482 ms · 2026-05-20T13:59:14.566907+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Austin, D

    J. Austin, D. D. Johnson, J. Ho, D. Tarlow, R. van den Berg. Structured denoising diffusion models in discrete state-spaces.NeurIPS, 2021

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    P. Bubenik. Statistical topological data analysis using persistence landscapes.Journal of Machine Learning Research, 16:77–102, 2015

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Carri` ere et al

    M. Carri` ere et al. PersLay: A neural network layer for persistence diagrams.AISTATS, 2020

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Chen and Y

    Y. Chen and Y. R. Gel. Topological zigzag spaghetti for diffusion-based generation and prediction on graphs.ICLR, 2025

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    R. B. Gabrielsson, B. J. Nelson, A. Dwaraknath, P. Skraba. A topology layer for machine learning.AISTATS, 2020

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    GeCA: Generative cellular automata for medical image generation.MICCAI, 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Gupta, D

    S. Gupta, D. Samaras, C. Chen. TopoDiffusionNet: A topology-aware diffusion model.ICLR, 2025

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Hofer, R

    C. Hofer, R. Kwitt, M. Niethammer, A. Uhl. Deep learning with topological signatures. NeurIPS, 2017

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Hu et al

    W. Hu et al. Topology-aware latent diffusion for 3D shape generation.arXiv:2401.17603, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Leygonie, S

    J. Leygonie, S. Oudot, U. Tillmann. A framework for differential calculus on persistence barcodes.Foundations of Computational Mathematics, 2022

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    Liu et al

    Z. Liu et al. GenPhys: From physical processes to generative models.ICLR, 2024

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    M. Moor, M. Horn, B. Rieck, K. Borgwardt. Topological autoencoders.ICML, 2020

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Mordvintsev, E

    A. Mordvintsev, E. Randazzo, E. Niklasson, M. Levin. Growing neural cellular automata. Distill, 2020

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    J. Park, D. Lee, Y. Song, G. Wu, W.H. Kim. Topology-aware graph diffusion model with persistent homology.NeurIPS, 2025

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Y. Xu, Z. Liu, M. Tegmark, T. Jaakkola. Poisson flow generative models.NeurIPS, 2022

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Carlsson and A

    G. Carlsson and A. Zomorodian. The theory of multidimensional persistence.Discrete & Computational Geometry, 42(1):71–93, 2009

    work page 2009

  17. [17]

    Carlsson and V

    G. Carlsson and V. de Silva. Zigzag persistence.Foundations of Computational Mathematics, 10(4):367–405, 2010. 13

    work page 2010

  18. [18]

    Carri` ere, F

    M. Carri` ere, F. Chazal, M. Glisse, Y. Ike, H. Kannan, Y. Umeda. Optimizing persistent homology based functions.ICML, 2021

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Edelsbrunner and J

    H. Edelsbrunner and J. Harer.Computational Topology: An Introduction. American Mathe- matical Society, 2010

    work page 2010

  20. [20]

    Edelsbrunner, D

    H. Edelsbrunner, D. Letscher, A. Zomorodian. Topological persistence and simplification. Discrete & Computational Geometry, 28(4):511–533, 2002

    work page 2002

  21. [21]

    J. Ho, A. Jain, P. Abbeel. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models.NeurIPS, 2020

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    M. Horn, E. De Brouwer, M. Moor, Y. Moreau, B. Rieck, K. Borgwardt. Topological graph neural networks.ICLR, 2022

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    K. Kim, J. Kim, M. Zaheer, J. Kim, F. Chazal, L. Wasserman. PLLay: Efficient topological layer based on persistence landscapes.NeurIPS, 2020

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    N. K. Ratha, J. H. Connell, R. M. Bolle. A real-time matching system for large fingerprint databases.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1996

    work page 1996

  25. [25]

    Rombach, A

    R. Rombach, A. Blattmann, D. Lorenz, P. Esser, B. Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models.CVPR, 2022

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Sohl-Dickstein, E

    J. Sohl-Dickstein, E. Weiss, N. Maheswaranathan, S. Ganguli. Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics.ICML, 2015

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    A. Som, K. N. Ramamurthy, P. Turaga. Geometric metrics for topological representations. Handbook of Variational Methods for Nonlinear Geometric Data, 2020

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Y. Song, J. Sohl-Dickstein, D. P. Kingma, A. Kumar, S. Ermon, B. Poole. Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations.ICLR, 2021

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Vignac, I

    C. Vignac, I. Krawczuk, A. Siraudin, B. Wang, V. Cevher, P. Frossard. DiGress: Discrete denoising diffusion for graph generation.ICLR, 2023

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    O. Vipond. Multiparameter persistence landscapes.Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(61):1–38, 2020. 14 Appendix A Weaker-baseline ablation: 5-d persistence summary We additionally trained a baseline whose conditioning is a 5-dimensional persistence summary {nH0, nH1,maxπ H1,P πH1,maxπ H0} rather than the 64-dimensional persistence landscape used in ...

    work page 2020