pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.18723 · v1 · pith:UPJXUZD5new · submitted 2026-05-18 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM

WaveDriver: a Laser Guide Star AO System for HWO

Benjamin L. Gerard , Alex Geringer-Sameth , Aditya R. Sengupta , Alexx Perloff , Dominic F. Sanchez , Peter Waswa , Cesar Laguna , Rebecca Jensen-Clem
show 2 more authors
Lisa Poyneer Megan Eckart
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 07:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM
keywords WaveDriverLaser Guide StarAdaptive OpticsHabitable Worlds ObservatoryWavefront StabilityPhotonic LanternSpace TelescopeAO Control
0
0 comments X

The pith

WaveDriver laser guide star AO system could be needed to meet HWO picometer wavefront stability.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the WaveDriver concept for the Habitable Worlds Observatory, combining a laser guide star spacecraft with an adaptive optics system to achieve the extreme stability needed for its science goals. This approach would provide a stable reference to control wavefront errors at the picometer level, more than 100 times better than JWST, while easing constraints on the telescope's primary mirror segments and low-order wavefront performance. The authors report on progress in AO control algorithms using linear quadratic Gaussian and machine learning techniques, a trade study comparing different wavefront sensors, and simulations showing the viability of a photonic lantern for natural guide star sensing. These developments lead to the conclusion that WaveDriver may be essential for satisfying HWO's stability specifications.

Core claim

WaveDriver is a concept for a laser guide star spacecraft coupled to an adaptive optics system onboard HWO that would enable HWO to reach its picometer-level wavefront stability requirements while relaxing other HWO subsystem requirements. Initial results from AO control developments with Linear Quadratic Gaussian control and machine learning, AO wavefront sensor trade study simulations, and simulations of a photonic lantern natural guide star WFS support the finding that WaveDriver could be needed to enable HWO's primary mirror segment stability and/or low order wavefront stability requirements.

What carries the argument

The WaveDriver system: a laser guide star spacecraft paired with an onboard adaptive optics system that supplies a stable reference for wavefront sensing and correction on HWO.

If this is right

  • Primary mirror segment stability requirements for HWO can be relaxed if WaveDriver provides the reference.
  • Low order wavefront stability specifications for HWO can be met using the laser guide star spacecraft.
  • Linear Quadratic Gaussian and machine learning control methods can be used effectively for the adaptive optics on HWO.
  • A photonic lantern can serve as a viable natural guide star wavefront sensor for this application.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • WaveDriver could simplify overall HWO design by shifting some stability control to an external spacecraft.
  • The hybrid laser guide star and onboard AO approach may apply to other space telescopes needing extreme stability for exoplanet observations.
  • Further end-to-end modeling of the full HWO mission with WaveDriver would clarify integration challenges.

Load-bearing premise

The AO control developments, WFS trade study simulations, and photonic lantern natural guide star WFS simulations accurately represent the performance achievable on HWO without additional real-world constraints or validation.

What would settle it

A higher-fidelity simulation or test in which HWO achieves its required primary mirror segment stability and low order wavefront stability without WaveDriver, or fails to meet those stabilities even when using the WaveDriver system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18723 by Aditya R. Sengupta, Alex Geringer-Sameth, Alexx Perloff, Benjamin L. Gerard, Cesar Laguna, Dominic F. Sanchez, Lisa Poyneer, Megan Eckart, Peter Waswa, Rebecca Jensen-Clem.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Conceptual Illustration of the HWO Laser Guide Star (LGS) adaptive optics (AO) sys [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: LGS WFS trade study results, showing (1) a Zernike WFS (ZWFS) is the most sensitive [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The dispersed PL meets the σ10 requirements for tip/tilt/focus for stars with mV ∼ 3.6 or brighter, while analogously a ZWFS requires stars brighter than mV ∼ 1.3. opening up more accessible targets for HWO to observe, with or without WaveDriver. Note that although this result may seem discrepant with past WFS sensitivity analyses (e.g., Ref 15 and 16), such analyses, which parametrize a unitless variable,… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: AO bandwidth error may prevent the HWO M1 laser metrology wavefront control system, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The 10 Hz HWO M1 actuator temporal bandwidth limit9 may prevent HWO from reaching σ10. This figure shows the required AO system parameters—frame rate (Ts; solid teal line) and latency (τ ; solid orange line)—needed needed to reach σ10 as a function of the input temporal disturbance spectral break (f0) when the integrated rms WFE stability between 1/(10 minutes) and the WFS’ temporal Nyquist limit (WFEin) i… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: LGS WFS simulation concept illustrations for the DM-based PCWFS11 and MZWFS used in our study in comparison to the ZWFS, and additionally for the EAC1- and 3-like architectures used. realizations of a focal plane electric field such that a downstream pupil plane generates two pupils that are separated by 1.1 pupil diameters, which then interfere in the final focal plane to form fringes. The DM-based PCWFS … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: An optimal PCWFS DM chopping amplitude of 12 rad PV produces the lowest amount of WFS measurement noise, computed from the rms of the difference of reconstructed wavefronts from simulated images with and without photon noise for this mV =-5 case. Simulations average 30 random WFE seeds per chop amplitude, each seed with 100 pm rms EAC1-like segment mode phase errors. The two curves, which both use a chop f… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Simulated phases for EAC1- and EAC3-like cases and corresponding target WFS images (i.e., differential with respect to a noiseless static WFE-only image) for mV =3, spatial WFE = 100 pm rms projected onto the given segment modes. in simulations both with and without photon noise. Each phase map at each time stamp is then Fraunhoffer propagated to produce a noisy image like in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Reconstructed temporal modal coefficients and corresponding temporal PSDs, for a single segment mode, (1) without photon noise (blue curves) and (2) differential between an image with photon noise and (1). The square root of the integral of the orange PSD in linear space is σn, which in this case is 129 pm rms. Dashed lines in the right panel show a linear fit to the signal and noise components in log-log … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The photon noise limits (σn) determined here are not dependent on any input power spectral density shape assumptions, demonstrated by the two different input PSDs (σs) that have different f0 values but are normalized to the same input WFE produce effectively the same photon noise limits. The core size is set such that the output ports are all single-moded over the wavelength range under consideration. Thi… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Noisy target WFS images for a mV =3 star for the achromatic ZWFS and PL (left and middle, respectively) that are the first of 6000 images used to reconstruct tip, tilt, and focus and average these corresponding PSDs (right) to ultimately generate σs and σn, showing the improved PL (σn ≲ 8 pm) vs. ZWFS (σn ∼ 22 pm) sensitivity. Appendix B: 1D GUI Tutorial We encourage the reader to visit https://github.com… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: A GUI snapshot, where in the shown instance the AO loop speed (1/Ts) of 10 Hz causes a 64 pm rms AO residual. The reader can adjust the TS and mV knobs while keeping the other parameters shown here unchanged to find that an minimum AO loop speed of 137 Hz is needed to reach σ10. We encourage the reader to explore all adjustable dimensions of the GUI to understand how σ10 requirements can be met or not. fr… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Habitable Worlds Observatory (HWO) presents a key challenge for technology development in the coming years, requiring a $>$ $100\times$ more stable system than \textit{JWST}. WaveDriver is a concept for a laser guide star spacecraft coupled to an adaptive optics (AO) system onboard HWO that would enable HWO to reach its picometer-level wavefront stability requirements while relaxing other HWO subsystem requirements. At LLNL and UCSC we are revisiting the concept initially proposed by Douglas et al.\ (2019). We present key results key initial results from the first phase of our project, including (1) AO control developments, including with Linear Quadratic Gaussian control and machine learning, (2) AO wavefront sensor (WFS) trade study simulations, and (3) simulations of a photonic lantern natural guide star WFS. A key finding from our work is that WaveDriver could be needed to enable HWO's primary mirror segment stability and/or low order wavefront stability requirements.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes WaveDriver, a laser guide star spacecraft coupled to an onboard adaptive optics system for the Habitable Worlds Observatory (HWO). It reports initial simulation results on AO control developments (including Linear Quadratic Gaussian and machine learning approaches), a wavefront sensor trade study, and photonic lantern natural guide star WFS performance. The central finding is that WaveDriver could be needed to satisfy HWO primary mirror segment stability and/or low-order wavefront stability requirements while relaxing other subsystem constraints.

Significance. If the reported simulation results are shown to hold under realistic conditions, the concept could meaningfully influence HWO technology development by providing a route to picometer-level stability that exceeds JWST performance by more than two orders of magnitude. The explicit use of LQG/ML control and photonic-lantern sensing constitutes a concrete technical contribution that builds directly on the 2019 Douglas et al. concept.

major comments (2)
  1. [AO control developments and WFS trade study simulations] The claim that WaveDriver could be needed for primary mirror segment stability and low-order wavefront stability is supported only by the AO control (LQG/ML), WFS trade-study, and photonic-lantern NGS simulations. These simulations are not shown to incorporate the full HWO disturbance spectrum (thermal, jitter, segment dynamics), leaving open whether the reported residual errors actually exceed the picometer requirements under flight-like conditions.
  2. [Abstract and initial results section] No quantitative performance metrics, error budgets, or benchmark comparisons are supplied for any of the three simulation campaigns, so it is not possible to evaluate whether the modeled performance gap is large enough to justify the added complexity of a dedicated laser-guide-star spacecraft.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains the duplicated phrase 'key results key initial results'; this should be corrected.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed review of our manuscript on the WaveDriver concept. We address each major comment below, clarifying the preliminary scope of the work while making targeted revisions to improve transparency and quantitative presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [AO control developments and WFS trade study simulations] The claim that WaveDriver could be needed for primary mirror segment stability and low-order wavefront stability is supported only by the AO control (LQG/ML), WFS trade-study, and photonic-lantern NGS simulations. These simulations are not shown to incorporate the full HWO disturbance spectrum (thermal, jitter, segment dynamics), leaving open whether the reported residual errors actually exceed the picometer requirements under flight-like conditions.

    Authors: We agree that the reported simulations represent initial results from the first phase of the project and do not yet incorporate the complete HWO disturbance spectrum, including the full range of thermal, jitter, and segment dynamics effects. These simulations were designed to isolate and demonstrate the performance of the LQG/ML control approaches and the WFS concepts under controlled conditions as a proof of concept. In the revised manuscript we have added explicit language in the abstract, Section 3, and the conclusions to state the preliminary nature of the results and to outline the planned follow-on work that will integrate a more comprehensive disturbance model. This revision directly addresses the concern without overstating the current findings. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract and initial results section] No quantitative performance metrics, error budgets, or benchmark comparisons are supplied for any of the three simulation campaigns, so it is not possible to evaluate whether the modeled performance gap is large enough to justify the added complexity of a dedicated laser-guide-star spacecraft.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the abstract and the summary of initial results would benefit from more explicit quantitative metrics, error budgets, and benchmark comparisons. Although detailed numerical results appear in the body of the paper, we have revised the abstract to include key residual wavefront error values and performance deltas relative to JWST and HWO requirements. We have also added a summary table in the results section that consolidates the metrics, error budgets, and direct comparisons for the three simulation campaigns. These changes enable readers to assess the magnitude of the performance gap and the rationale for the added complexity of the WaveDriver spacecraft. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: claims rest on forward simulations of proposed AO system

full rationale

The paper derives its key finding—that WaveDriver could be needed for HWO segment and low-order stability—from forward simulations of AO control (LQG/ML), WFS trade studies, and photonic lantern NGS performance. These generate predicted residual errors from modeled inputs and proposed hardware rather than fitting parameters to target outcomes or redefining quantities in terms of the results themselves. The reference to Douglas et al. (2019) is an external concept revisit and does not supply load-bearing justification for the current simulation outputs. No self-definitional loops, fitted-input predictions, or ansatz smuggling via self-citation appear in the derivation chain. The analysis is self-contained against external benchmarks of simulation validity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the paper introduces the WaveDriver concept and reports simulation outcomes without detailing free parameters, background axioms, or new physical entities beyond the proposed system itself.

invented entities (1)
  • WaveDriver laser guide star spacecraft no independent evidence
    purpose: Provide stable reference source for onboard AO system to achieve picometer wavefront stability on HWO
    Postulated as a coupled spacecraft-AO solution to relax HWO subsystem requirements; no independent evidence or falsifiable prediction outside the simulations is given in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5738 in / 1155 out tokens · 39376 ms · 2026-05-20T07:37:18.951384+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    doi:10.17226/26141 , adsurl =

    National Academies of Sciences and Medicine, Engineering , title = ". doi:10.17226/26141 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.17226/26141

  2. [2]

    Laser Guide Star for Large Segmented-aperture Space Telescopes. I. Implications for Terrestrial Exoplanet Detection and Observatory Stability. Astronomical Journal , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaf385 , archivePrefix =. 1811.05309 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaf385

  3. [3]

    Space-based laser guide stars for astronomical observatories , author =

    work page

  4. [4]

    Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , keywords =

    Adaptive optics performance of a simulated coronagraph instrument on a large, segmented space telescope in steady state. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , keywords =. doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.8.3.035002 , archivePrefix =. 2209.15063 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1117/1.jatis.8.3.035002

  5. [5]

    Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , year = 2024, editor =

    Wavefront sensing and control for a future Habitable Worlds Observatory. Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , year = 2024, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.3020583 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3020583 2024

  6. [6]

    The Photonic Lantern

    The photonic lantern. Advances in Optics and Photonics , keywords =. doi:10.1364/AOP.7.000107 , archivePrefix =. 1503.02837 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1364/aop.7.000107

  7. [7]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Experimental validation of photonic lantern imaging and wavefront sensing performance. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.20078 , archivePrefix =. 2508.20078 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.20078

  8. [8]

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , keywords =

    High-speed Focal Plane Wave Front Sensing with an Optical Chopper. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/acb6b6 , archivePrefix =. 2301.11282 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/acb6b6

  9. [9]

    Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , year = 2023, series =

    Deformable mirror-based pupil chopping for exoplanet imaging and adaptive optics. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , year = 2023, series =. doi:10.1117/12.2676556 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2676556 2023

  10. [10]

    Astronomical adaptive optics. I. Modal control optimization. Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =

    work page

  11. [11]

    Applied Optics , year = 2023, month = mar, volume =

    Laboratory demonstration of the prediction of wind-blown turbulence by adaptive optics at 8 kHz with use of LQG control. Applied Optics , year = 2023, month = mar, volume =. doi:10.1364/AO.474730 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1364/ao.474730 2023

  12. [12]

    Limits of Adaptive Optics for high contrast imaging

    Limits of Adaptive Optics for High-Contrast Imaging. Astrophysical Journal , keywords =. doi:10.1086/431209 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0505086 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/431209

  13. [13]

    Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , keywords =

    Microelectromechanical deformable mirror development for high-contrast imaging, part 1: miniaturized, flight-capable control electronics. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , keywords =. doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.6.4.045001 , archivePrefix =. 2011.02098 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1117/1.jatis.6.4.045001 2011

  14. [14]

    Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , year = 2024, editor =

    Demonstration of single-picometer deformable mirror wavefront control using high-resolution electronics. Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2024: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave , year = 2024, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.3017631 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3017631 2024

  15. [15]

    HWO25 conference proceedings , year = 2025, series =

    Habitable Worlds Observatory Overall Approach and Progress. HWO25 conference proceedings , year = 2025, series =

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    HWO25 conference proceedings , year = 2025, series =

    Reaching Concept Maturity Level 3 on HWO. HWO25 conference proceedings , year = 2025, series =

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    Lightbeam: Simulate light through weakly-guiding waveguides

    work page

  18. [18]

    Adaptive Optics Systems VI , year = 2018, editor =

    High Contrast Imaging for Python (HCIPy): an open-source adaptive optics and coronagraph simulator. Adaptive Optics Systems VI , year = 2018, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.2314407 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2314407 2018

  19. [19]

    Optical Modeling and Performance Predictions XIV , year = 2024, editor =

    Habitable world observatory modeling optical and metrology models, and performance predictions. Optical Modeling and Performance Predictions XIV , year = 2024, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.3030015 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3030015 2024

  20. [20]

    Adaptive Optics Systems VIII , year = 2022, editor =

    Various wavefront sensing and control developments on the Santa Cruz Extreme AO Laboratory (SEAL) testbed. Adaptive Optics Systems VIII , year = 2022, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.2630519 , archivePrefix =. 2208.03402 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2630519 2022

  21. [21]

    Jacoby and Alison Nordt and Liz Osborne , title =

    Alain Carrier and Kiarash Tajdaran and Michael S. Jacoby and Alison Nordt and Liz Osborne , title =. UV/Optical/IR Space Telescopes and Instruments: Innovative Technologies and Concepts XII , editor =. 2025 , doi =

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    WaveDriver: a Laser Guide Star AO System for HWO

    WaveDriver: a Laser Guide Star AO System for HWO. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.18643 , archivePrefix =. 2509.18643 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.18643

  23. [23]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Swanson, Robin and Lamb, Masen and Correia, Carlos M and Sivanandam, Suresh and Kutulakos, Kiriakos , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab632 , url =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab632 2021

  24. [24]

    Adaptive optics control using model-based reinforcement learning , volume =

    Jalo Nousiainen and Chang Rajani and Markus Kasper and Tapio Helin , journal =. Adaptive optics control using model-based reinforcement learning , volume =. 2021 , url =. doi:10.1364/OE.420270 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.420270 2021

  25. [25]

    Wong and Barnaby R

    Alison P. Wong and Barnaby R. M. Norris and Peter G. Tuthill and Richard Scalzo and Julien Lozi and S. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , number =. 2021 , doi =

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Adaptive Optics Systems VIII , editor =

    Jalo Nousiainen and Byron Engler and Markus Kasper and Tapio Helin and C. Adaptive Optics Systems VIII , editor =. 2022 , doi =

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Pou and F

    B. Pou and F. Ferreira and E. Quinones and D. Gratadour and M. Martin , journal =. Adaptive optics control with multi-agent model-free reinforcement learning , volume =. 2022 , url =. doi:10.1364/OE.444099 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.444099 2022

  28. [28]

    2022 , issn =

    Adaptive optics based on machine learning: a review , journal =. 2022 , issn =. doi:10.29026/oea.2022.200082 , url =

    work page doi:10.29026/oea.2022.200082 2022

  29. [29]

    Integrating supervised and reinforcement learning for predictive control with an unmodulated pyramid wavefront sensor for adaptive optics , volume =

    Bartomeu Pou and Jeffrey Smith and Eduardo Quinones and Mario Martin and Damien Gratadour , journal =. Integrating supervised and reinforcement learning for predictive control with an unmodulated pyramid wavefront sensor for adaptive optics , volume =. 2024 , url =. doi:10.1364/OE.530254 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.530254 2024

  30. [30]

    2024 , note =

    Jalo Nousiainen , title =. 2024 , note =

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Adaptive Optics Systems IX , editor =

    Jonathan Dray and Baptiste Sinquin and Morgan Gray and Benoit Neichel and C. Adaptive Optics Systems IX , editor =. 2024 , doi =

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.1201549 , url =

    fastmachinelearning/hls4ml , year = 2024, publisher =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1201549 , url =

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.1201549 2024

  33. [33]

    2025 , url =

    hls4ml , organization =. 2025 , url =

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Fast inference of deep neural networks in FPGAs for particle physics

    Duarte, Javier and others. Fast inference of deep neural networks in FPGAs for particle physics. JINST. 2018. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/07/P07027. arXiv:1804.06913

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/07/p07027 2018

  35. [35]

    hls4ml: An Open-Source Codesign Workflow to Empower Scientific Low-Power Machine Learning Devices

    Fahim, Farah and others. hls4ml: An Open-Source Codesign Workflow to Empower Scientific Low-Power Machine Learning Devices. tinyML Research Symposium 2021. 2021. arXiv:2103.05579

    work page arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    Machine Learning: Science and Technology , abstract =

    Aarrestad, Thea and Loncar, Vladimir and Ghielmetti, Nicolò and Pierini, Maurizio and Summers, Sioni and Ngadiuba, Jennifer and Petersson, Christoffer and Linander, Hampus and Iiyama, Yutaro and Di Guglielmo, Giuseppe and Duarte, Javier and Harris, Philip and Rankin, Dylan and Jindariani, Sergo and Pedro, Kevin and Tran, Nhan and Liu, Mia and Kreinar, Edw...

    work page doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ac0ea1 2021

  37. [37]

    Machine Learning: Science and Technology , abstract =

    Khoda, Elham E and Rankin, Dylan and Teixeira de Lima, Rafael and Harris, Philip and Hauck, Scott and Hsu, Shih-Chieh and Kagan, Michael and Loncar, Vladimir and Paikara, Chaitanya and Rao, Richa and Summers, Sioni and Vernieri, Caterina and Wang, Aaron , title =. Machine Learning: Science and Technology , abstract =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1088/2632-2153...

    work page doi:10.1088/2632-2153/acc0d7 2023

  38. [38]

    and Guglielmo, G

    Summers, S. and Guglielmo, G. Di and Duarte, J. and Harris, P. and Hoang, D. and Jindariani, S. and Kreinar, E. and Loncar, V. and Ngadiuba, J. and Pierini, M. and Rankin, D. and Tran, N. and Wu, Z. , title =. Journal of Instrumentation , abstract =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/05/P05026 , url =

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/05/p05026 2020

  39. [39]

    IMPETUS-UdeS/rule4ml , year = 2024, publisher =

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    and Di Guglielmo, Giuseppe and Duarte, Javier and Loncar, Vladimir , title =

    Hawks, Benjamin and Plotnikov, Dennis and Tran, Nhan and Tame-Narvaez, Karla and Rahimifar, Mohammad Mehdi and Rahali, Hamza Ezzaoui and Therrien, Audrey C. and Di Guglielmo, Giuseppe and Duarte, Javier and Loncar, Vladimir , title =. Proceedings of the 2025 ACM/SIGDA International Symposium on Field Programmable Gate Arrays , pages =. 2025 , isbn =. doi:...

    work page doi:10.1145/3706628.3708827 2025

  41. [41]

    A Graph Neural Network Surrogate Model for hls4ml

    Plotnikov, Dennis and Hawks, Benjamin and Tran, Nhan V. A Graph Neural Network Surrogate Model for hls4ml

    work page

  42. [42]

    2023 , url =

    Alveo U200 and U250 Data Center Accelerator Cards Data Sheet (DS962) , organization =. 2023 , url =

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    2023 , url =

    Alveo U200 and U250 Accelerator Cards User Guide (UG1289) , organization =. 2023 , url =

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    2021 , version =

    Vivado Design Suite User Guide: High-Level Synthesis (UG902) , organization =. 2021 , version =

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    2025 , url =

    Vitis High-Level Synthesis User Guide (UG1399) , organization =. 2025 , url =

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms

    Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1707.06347 , archivePrefix =. 1707.06347 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.06347

  47. [47]

    Model-based policy optimization for adaptive optics

    Toward on-sky adaptive optics control using reinforcement learning. Model-based policy optimization for adaptive optics. Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243311 , archivePrefix =. 2205.07554 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243311

  48. [48]

    Astronomy and Astrphysics , keywords =

    Model atmospheres broad-band colors, bolometric corrections and temperature calibrations for O - M stars. Astronomy and Astrphysics , keywords =

    work page

  49. [49]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =

    Modeling noise propagation in Fourier-filtering wavefront sensing, fundamental limits, and quantitative comparison. Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245351 , archivePrefix =. 2212.13577 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245351

  50. [50]

    Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , keywords =

    Linking strategic astrophysics missions, technology gaps, and technology maturation investments. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , keywords =. doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.11.2.024003 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/1.jatis.11.2.024003

  51. [51]

    Adaptive Optics for Astronomy , year = 1994, editor =

    Adaptive Optics for Astronomy. Adaptive Optics for Astronomy , year = 1994, editor =

    work page 1994

  52. [52]

    Astronomical adaptive optics. I. Modal control optimization. Astronomy & Astrophysics , keywords =

    work page

  53. [53]

    Modern control engineering

    work page

  54. [54]

    Type II Woofer-Tweeter Control for NFIRAOS on TMT , year =

    Jean-Pierre V\'. Type II Woofer-Tweeter Control for NFIRAOS on TMT , year =. Frontiers in Optics 2009/Laser Science XXV/Fall 2009 OSA Optics & Photonics Technical Digest , journal =. doi:10.1364/AOPT.2009.JTuC2 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1364/aopt.2009.jtuc2 2009

  55. [55]

    Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , keywords =

    Coronagraphic detection of Earth-like planets with large, actively controlled space telescopes. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , keywords =. doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.8.4.049002 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/1.jatis.8.4.049002

  56. [56]

    Sanchez-Soria and S

    N. Sanchez-Soria and S. D. Will and J. R. Fienup , title =. Techniques and Instrumentation for Detection of Exoplanets XII , editor =. 2025 , doi =

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , keywords =

    HWO Target Stars and Systems: A Prioritized Community List of Potential Stellar Targets for the Habitable Worlds Observatory's ExoEarth Survey. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ae0a81 , archivePrefix =. 2509.20544 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ae0a81

  58. [58]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =

    Variation on a Zernike wavefront sensor theme: Optimal use of photons. Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140870 , archivePrefix =. 2105.07690 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140870

  59. [59]

    Optical Engineering , number =

    Hagyong Kihm and Ho-Soon Yang , title =. Optical Engineering , number =. 2013 , doi =

    work page 2013

  60. [60]

    Optics Letters , keywords =

    Experimental and on-sky demonstration of spectrally dispersed wavefront sensing using a photonic lantern. Optics Letters , keywords =. doi:10.1364/OL.551624 , archivePrefix =. 2505.00765 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.551624