pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19144 · v1 · pith:JCNDYBT7new · submitted 2026-05-18 · ✦ hep-ex

Search for Higgs boson decays into two neutral scalars with unequal masses in final states with b quarks and tau leptons in proton-proton collisions at sqrt{s} = 13 TeV

CMS Collaboration This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 07:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex
keywords Higgs bosonneutral scalarstau leptonsb quarksupper limitsCMSLHC13 TeV
0
0 comments X

The pith

CMS finds no significant excess in its search for Higgs boson decays to pairs of neutral scalars with unequal masses in b-tau final states.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines proton-proton collision data for evidence that the Higgs boson decays into two different neutral scalars, one of which may then decay into a pair of the lighter scalars. One scalar is required to decay to tau leptons while the other produces b quarks, either directly or through the cascade. With 138 fb^{-1} collected at 13 TeV, the analysis compares observed event yields and kinematic distributions against standard model backgrounds. No statistically significant deviation is seen, so the collaboration reports upper limits on the product of the Higgs production cross section and the relevant branching fractions for a range of scalar mass hypotheses.

Core claim

No statistically significant excess over the standard model expectation is observed. Upper limits are set on the products σ ℬ(H → φ1φ2 → 3φ1 → 2τ4b) and σ ℬ(H → φ1φ2) ℬ(φ1 → 2τ) ℬ(φ2 → 2b), ranging between 0.9 and 36.8 pb at 95% confidence level depending on the mass hypothesis and decay scenario.

What carries the argument

Reconstruction of final states containing two b-tagged jets and two tau leptons, with signal templates generated for hypothesized masses of φ1 and φ2 and compared to data via statistical fits that extract upper limits on signal strength.

If this is right

  • The absence of signal constrains the allowed parameter space for extensions of the Higgs sector that include additional neutral scalars decaying to taus and b quarks.
  • For any given pair of scalar masses, the Higgs production rate times the branching fraction to the considered final state is bounded above by the quoted limit values.
  • The cascade decay scenario φ2 → φ1φ1 is treated separately from the direct decay, each receiving its own set of mass-dependent limits.
  • These results apply only to the specific final-state topology with one φ1 decaying to taus and the other to b quarks or to two additional φ1 particles.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar searches in other final states such as four b quarks or four taus could be combined with these results to strengthen overall constraints on the same scalar models.
  • The mass-dependent nature of the limits implies that future data sets with higher luminosity will be most effective at excluding or discovering signals in the regions where current bounds are weakest.
  • If a signal appears at higher energies or luminosities, the reported background modeling techniques could be reused as a baseline for the new observation.

Load-bearing premise

The standard model background processes are accurately modeled and the signal efficiencies for the hypothesized scalar masses are correctly estimated from simulations.

What would settle it

A statistically significant excess of events in one or more mass hypotheses that cannot be accounted for by adjustments to the background model would indicate a signal and invalidate the reported upper limits.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.19144 by CMS Collaboration.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Representative schematic diagrams showing the ggF (upper) and VBF (lower) pro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Pre-fit distributions of Dζ (upper left), mvis(ττb1 ) (upper right), mT (µ, p miss T ) (lower left), and mT (τh , p miss T ) (lower right), including underflow and overflow bins, for preselected events with at least one b-tagged jet for the µτh channel, without any SR requirements. The data are shown by the markers with vertical bars and various backgrounds by the colored histograms. The combination of sta… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Pre-fit BDT score distribution for preselected events with at least one b-tagged jet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Background only, post-fit mτ τ distributions for the µτh channel, in events with ex￾actly one b-tagged jet: SR1 (upper left), SR2 (upper right), SR3 (middle left), and SR4 (middle right), and in events with at least two b-tagged jets: SR1 (lower left) and SR2 (lower right). The data are shown by the markers with vertical bars and various backgrounds by the colored his￾tograms. The total systematic uncertai… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Background only, post-fit mτ τ distributions for the eτh channel, in events with ex￾actly one b-tagged jet: SR1 (upper left), SR2 (upper right), SR3 (middle left), and SR4 (middle right), and in events with at least two b-tagged jets: SR1 (lower left) and SR2 (lower right). The data are shown by the markers with vertical bars and various backgrounds by the colored his￾tograms. The total systematic uncertai… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Background only, post-fit mτ τ distributions for the eµ channel, in events with exactly one b-tagged jet: SR1 (upper left), SR2 (upper right), and SR3 (middle left), and in events with at least two b-tagged jets: SR1 (middle right) and SR2 (lower). The data are shown by the markers with vertical bars and various backgrounds by the colored histograms. The total systematic uncertainty is shown by the hatched… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The observed (points) and median expected (dotted line) 95% CL upper limits on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The observed (points) and median expected (dotted line) 95% CL upper limits on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: illustrates the observed 95% CL upper limit on the products σBC and σBNC for the different mass hypotheses, found from the combination of the three individual channels. The specific (ϕ1 , ϕ2 ) mass hypotheses (15, 30), (20, 40), and (30, 60) GeV are evaluated for both cascade and non-cascade scenarios; however, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A search for Higgs boson (H) decays into a pair of neutral scalars $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$, with $\phi_2$ heavier than $\phi_1$, is performed in final states with b quarks and tau leptons. Depending on the masses of the neutral scalars, $\phi_2$ can undergo a cascade decay into $\phi_1\phi_1$. For both the cascade and non-cascade scenarios, one $\phi_1$ is required to decay to a pair of tau leptons. Proton-proton collision data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$ collected with the CMS detector at the LHC at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV are analyzed. No statistically significant excess over the standard model expectation is observed. Upper limits are set on the products $\sigma \mathcal{B}$(H $\to$ $\phi_1\phi_2$ $\to$ 3$\phi_1$ $\to$ 2$\tau$4b) and $\sigma \mathcal{B}$(H $\to$ $\phi_1\phi_2$) $\mathcal{B}$($\phi_1$ $\to$ 2$\tau$) $\mathcal{B}$($\phi_2$ $\to$ 2b) where $\sigma$ is the Higgs boson production cross section. The observed upper limits range between 0.9 and 36.8 pb at 95% confidence level, depending on the mass hypothesis and decay scenario.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports a search for Higgs boson decays to two neutral scalars φ1 and φ2 (with m_φ2 > m_φ1) in final states containing b quarks and tau leptons, using 138 fb^{-1} of CMS proton-proton collision data at √s = 13 TeV. It considers both non-cascade (H → φ1φ2 with φ1 → ττ, φ2 → bb) and cascade (H → φ1φ2 → 3φ1 with φ1 → ττ) scenarios. No statistically significant excess over Standard Model expectations is observed, and 95% CL upper limits are set on the products σB(H → φ1φ2 → 3φ1 → 2τ4b) and σB(H → φ1φ2) B(φ1 → 2τ) B(φ2 → 2b), ranging from 0.9 to 36.8 pb depending on the mass hypothesis.

Significance. If the background modeling and signal efficiencies hold, this provides useful constraints on extended Higgs sectors and exotic decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson. The analysis covers a range of mass hypotheses for the scalars and employs standard CMS techniques including data-driven background estimation in control regions, b-tagging and tau identification scale factors, and systematic variations. This strengthens the result as a reliable null-search outcome that can guide BSM model building.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract would benefit from a brief statement on the background estimation approach (e.g., data-driven methods in control regions) to improve standalone readability without requiring the full text.
  2. In the results section, the discussion of how signal efficiencies vary with mass hypotheses could be expanded to explicitly address whether efficiency losses at extreme mass differences impact the quoted limit range.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review of our manuscript and for recommending minor revision. The referee's summary accurately reflects the scope and results of our search for Higgs boson decays to two neutral scalars with unequal masses in the b-quark and tau-lepton final states. No major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper is an experimental search in hep-ex that reports no statistically significant excess in collision data over Standard Model backgrounds and derives 95% CL upper limits on signal cross-section times branching fractions. The derivation chain consists of event selection, background estimation (including data-driven methods in control regions), signal efficiency from Monte Carlo, and statistical limit-setting via likelihood fits. None of these steps reduce by construction to self-referential inputs, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations; the result is directly falsifiable against external data and follows standard CMS procedures with quoted uncertainties.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The analysis relies on standard domain assumptions about background modeling and detector simulation rather than new free parameters or ad-hoc inventions; the neutral scalars are search targets rather than established entities.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard Model processes accurately describe the expected background in the selected b-tau final states.
    Invoked to define the null hypothesis against which any excess is tested.
  • domain assumption Monte Carlo simulations correctly predict signal acceptance and efficiency across the scanned mass hypotheses.
    Required to translate observed event counts into upper limits on production cross section times branching fraction.
invented entities (2)
  • neutral scalar φ1 no independent evidence
    purpose: Lighter hypothetical particle produced in Higgs decay and decaying to tau leptons.
    Postulated new particle whose existence is tested but not confirmed by the data.
  • neutral scalar φ2 no independent evidence
    purpose: Heavier hypothetical particle produced in Higgs decay, decaying to b quarks or cascading to two φ1.
    Postulated new particle whose existence is tested but not confirmed by the data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5822 in / 1586 out tokens · 89999 ms · 2026-05-20T07:00:33.995578+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

113 extracted references · 113 canonical work pages · 60 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A model of leptons

    S. Weinberg, “A model of leptons”,Phys. Rev. Lett.19(1967) 1264, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.19.1264

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.19.1264 1967

  2. [2]

    Weak and electromagnetic interactions

    A. Salam, “Weak and electromagnetic interactions”,Conf. Proc. C680519(1968) 367, doi:10.1142/9789812795915_0034

    work page doi:10.1142/9789812795915_0034 1968

  3. [3]

    Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vector mesons

    F. Englert and R. Brout, “Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vector mesons”, Phys. Rev. Lett.13(1964) 321,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.321

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.13.321 1964

  4. [4]

    Broken symmetries, massless particles and gauge fields

    P . W. Higgs, “Broken symmetries, massless particles and gauge fields”,Phys. Lett.12 (1964) 132,doi:10.1016/0031-9163(64)91136-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0031-9163(64)91136-9 1964

  5. [5]

    Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons

    P . W. Higgs, “Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons”,Phys. Rev. Lett.13 (1964) 508,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.508

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.13.508 1964

  6. [6]

    Global conservation laws and massless particles

    G. S. Guralnik, C. R. Hagen, and T. W. B. Kibble, “Global conservation laws and massless particles”,Phys. Rev. Lett.13(1964) 585,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.585

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.13.585 1964

  7. [7]

    Spontaneous symmetry breakdown without massless bosons

    P . W. Higgs, “Spontaneous symmetry breakdown without massless bosons”,Phys. Rev. 145(1966) 1156,doi:10.1103/PhysRev.145.1156

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.145.1156 1966

  8. [8]

    Symmetry breaking in non-Abelian gauge theories

    T. W. B. Kibble, “Symmetry breaking in non-Abelian gauge theories”,Phys. Rev.155 (1967) 1554,doi:10.1103/PhysRev.155.1554

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.155.1554 1967

  9. [9]

    Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC”,Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 1, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020,arXiv:1207.7214

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020 2012

  10. [10]

    Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC”,Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 30, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021,arXiv:1207.7235

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021 2012

  11. [11]

    Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 and 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at √s= 7 and 8 TeV”,JHEP06(2013) 081, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2013)081,arXiv:1303.4571

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2013)081 2013

  12. [12]

    A Natural Two-Higgs-Doublet Model

    B. Grzadkowski and P . Osland, “Tempered two-Higgs-doublet model”,Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 125026,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.125026,arXiv:0910.4068

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.125026 2010

  13. [13]

    Extending two-Higgs-doublet models by a singlet scalar field - the Case for Dark Matter

    A. Drozd, B. Grzadkowski, J. F. Gunion, and Y. Jiang, “Extending two-Higgs-doublet models by a singlet scalar field - the case for dark matter”,JHEP11(2014) 105, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2014)105,arXiv:1408.2106. 22

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep11(2014)105 2014

  14. [14]

    A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery

    CMS Collaboration, “A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery.”,Nature607(2022) 60,doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04892-x, arXiv:2207.00043. [Erratum:doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06164-8]

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04892-x 2022

  15. [15]

    A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery

    ATLAS Collaboration, “A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery”,Nature607(2022) 52, doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04893-w,arXiv:2207.00092. [Erratum: doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06248-5]

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04893-w 2022

  16. [16]

    Search for new light gauge bosons in Higgs boson decays to four-lepton final states in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for new light gauge bosons in Higgs boson decays to four-lepton final states in pp collisions at √s=8 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC”,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 092001,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.092001, arXiv:1505.07645

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.092001 2015

  17. [17]

    Search for a non-standard-model Higgs boson decaying to a pair of new light bosons in four-muon final states

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for a non-standard-model Higgs boson decaying to a pair of new light bosons in four-muon final states”,Phys. Lett. B726(2013) 564, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.09.009,arXiv:1210.7619

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.09.009 2013

  18. [18]

    A search for pair production of new light bosons decaying into muons

    CMS Collaboration, “A search for pair production of new light bosons decaying into muons”,Phys. Lett. B752(2016) 146,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.10.067, arXiv:1506.00424

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.10.067 2016

  19. [19]

    Search for light bosons in decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson in proton-proton collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for light bosons in decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson in proton-proton collisions at √s=8 TeV”,JHEP10(2017) 076, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2017)076,arXiv:1701.02032

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2017)076 2017

  20. [20]

    Search for a very light NMSSM Higgs boson produced in decays of the 125 GeV scalar boson and decaying into tau leptons in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for a very light NMSSM Higgs boson produced in decays of the 125 GeV scalar boson and decaying intoτleptons in pp collisions at √s=8 TeV”, JHEP01(2016) 079,doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2016)079,arXiv:1510.06534

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep01(2016)079 2016

  21. [21]

    Search for new phenomena in events with at least three photons collected in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for new phenomena in events with at least three photons collected in pp collisions at √s= 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,Eur. Phys. J. C76 (2016) 210,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4034-8,arXiv:1509.05051

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4034-8 2016

  22. [22]

    Search for Higgs boson decays to beyond-the-Standard-Model light bosons in four-lepton events with the ATLAS detector at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for Higgs boson decays to beyond-the-standard-model light bosons in four-lepton events with the ATLAS detector at √s=13 TeV”,JHEP06 (2018) 166,doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2018)166,arXiv:1802.03388

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2018)166 2018

  23. [23]

    A search for pair production of new light bosons decaying into muons in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “A search for pair production of new light bosons decaying into muons in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV”,Phys. Lett. B796(2019) 131, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.07.013,arXiv:1812.00380

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.07.013 2019

  24. [24]

    Search for Higgs bosons decaying to $aa$ in the $\mu\mu\tau\tau$ final state in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} = $ 8 TeV with the ATLAS experiment

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for Higgs bosons decaying to aa in theµµττfinal state in pp collisions at √s=8 TeV with the ATLAS experiment”,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 052002,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.052002,arXiv:1505.01609

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.052002 2015

  25. [25]

    Search for an exotic decay of the Higgs boson to a pair of light pseudoscalars in the final state of two muons and two $\tau$ leptons in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for an exotic decay of the Higgs boson to a pair of light pseudoscalars in the final state of two muons and twoτleptons in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JHEP11(2018) 018,doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2018)018, arXiv:1805.04865

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep11(2018)018 2018

  26. [26]

    Search for a light pseudoscalar Higgs boson in the boostedµµττ final state in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for a light pseudoscalar Higgs boson in the boostedµµττ final state in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JHEP08(2020) 139, doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2020)139,arXiv:2005.08694. References 23

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2020)139 2020

  27. [27]

    Search for Higgs boson decays into a pair of light bosons in the $bb\mu\mu$ final state in $pp$ collision at $\sqrt{s} = $13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for Higgs boson decays into a pair of light bosons in the bbµµfinal state in pp collision at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,Phys. Lett. B 790(2019) 1,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.10.073,arXiv:1807.00539

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.10.073 2019

  28. [28]

    Search for exotic decays of the Higgs boson to a pair of pseudoscalars in theµµbb andττbb final states

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for exotic decays of the Higgs boson to a pair of pseudoscalars in theµµbb andττbb final states”,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 493, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12727-4,arXiv:2402.13358

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12727-4 2024

  29. [29]

    Search for Higgs boson decays into pairs of light (pseudo)scalar particles in the $\gamma\gamma jj$ final state in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for Higgs boson decays into pairs of light (pseudo)scalar particles in theγγjj final state in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”, Phys. Lett. B782(2018) 750,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.06.011, arXiv:1803.11145

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.06.011 2018

  30. [30]

    Search for light pseudoscalar boson pairs produced from decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson in final states with two muons and two nearby tracks in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for light pseudoscalar boson pairs produced from decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson in final states with two muons and two nearby tracks in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV”,Phys. Lett. B800(2020) 135087, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.135087,arXiv:1907.07235

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.135087 2020

  31. [31]

    Search for the decay of the Higgs boson to a pair of light pseudoscalar bosons in the final state with four bottom quarks in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for the decay of the Higgs boson to a pair of light pseudoscalar bosons in the final state with four bottom quarks in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV”,JHEP06(2024) 097,doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2024)097, arXiv:2403.10341

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2024)097 2024

  32. [32]

    Search for the exotic decay of the Higgs boson into two light pseudoscalars with four photons in the final state in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for the exotic decay of the Higgs boson into two light pseudoscalars with four photons in the final state in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV”,JHEP07(2023) 148,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2023)148,arXiv:2208.01469

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2023)148 2023

  33. [33]

    Search for exotic Higgs boson decays H→ AA →4γwith events containing two merged diphotons in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for exotic Higgs boson decays H→ AA →4γwith events containing two merged diphotons in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV”,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 101801,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.101801, arXiv:2209.06197

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.101801 2023

  34. [34]

    Search for light pseudoscalar boson pairs produced from Higgs boson decays using the 4$\tau$ and 2$\mu$2$\tau$ final states in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for light pseudoscalar boson pairs produced from Higgs boson decays using the 4τand 2µ2τfinal states in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV”, 2025.arXiv:2508.06947. Accepted byJHEP

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Model-independent search for pair production of new bosons decaying into muons in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Model-independent search for pair production of new bosons decaying into muons in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV”,JHEP12(2024) 172, doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2024)172,arXiv:2407.20425

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2024)172 2024

  36. [36]

    Search for Higgs boson exotic decays into Lorentz-boosted light bosons in the four-τfinal state at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for Higgs boson exotic decays into Lorentz-boosted light bosons in the four-τfinal state at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,Phys. Lett. B 870(2025) 139843,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139843,arXiv:2503.05463

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139843 2025

  37. [37]

    Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models

    G. C. Branco et al., “Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models”,Phys. Rept.516(2012) 1,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.02.002,arXiv:1106.0034

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.02.002 2012

  38. [38]

    Supergauge invariant extension of the Higgs mechanism and a model for the electron and its neutrino

    P . Fayet, “Supergauge invariant extension of the Higgs mechanism and a model for the electron and its neutrino”,Nucl. Phys. B90(1975) 104, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(75)90636-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(75)90636-7 1975

  39. [39]

    Cancellation of quadratically divergent mass corrections in globally supersymmetric spontaneously broken gauge theories

    R. K. Kaul and P . Majumdar, “Cancellation of quadratically divergent mass corrections in globally supersymmetric spontaneously broken gauge theories”,Nucl. Phys. B199 (1982) 36,doi:10.1016/0550-3213(82)90565-X. 24

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(82)90565-x 1982

  40. [40]

    Gauge models with spontaneously broken local supersymmetry

    R. Barbieri, S. Ferrara, and C. A. Savoy, “Gauge models with spontaneously broken local supersymmetry”,Phys. Lett. B119(1982) 343, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90685-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90685-2 1982

  41. [41]

    Weak interaction breakdown induced by supergravity

    H. P . Nilles, M. Srednicki, and D. Wyler, “Weak interaction breakdown induced by supergravity”,Phys. Lett.120(1983) 346,doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90460-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90460-4 1983

  42. [42]

    Fermion masses and induction of the weak scale by supergravity

    J. M. Frere, D. R. T. Jones, and S. Raby, “Fermion masses and induction of the weak scale by supergravity”,Nucl. Phys. B222(1983) 11, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(83)90606-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(83)90606-5 1983

  43. [43]

    Quantum effects and SU(2)×U(1) breaking in supergravity gauge theories

    J. P . Derendinger and C. A. Savoy, “Quantum effects and SU(2)×U(1) breaking in supergravity gauge theories”,Nucl. Phys. B237(1984) 307, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(84)90162-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(84)90162-7 1984

  44. [44]

    Supersymmetric models with extended Higgs sector

    M. Drees, “Supersymmetric models with extended Higgs sector”,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A4 (1989) 3635,doi:10.1142/S0217751X89001448

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x89001448 1989

  45. [45]

    The Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric extension of the Standard Model reviewed

    M. Maniatis, “The next-to-minimal supersymmetric extension of the standard model reviewed”,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A25(2010) 3505,doi:10.1142/S0217751X10049827, arXiv:0906.0777

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0217751x10049827 2010

  46. [46]

    The Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model

    U. Ellwanger, C. Hugonie, and A. M. Teixeira, “The next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model”,Phys. Rept.496(2010) 1, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.07.001,arXiv:0910.1785

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.07.001 2010

  47. [47]

    Weak interaction singlet and strong CP invariance

    J. E. Kim, “Weak interaction singlet and strong CP invariance”,Phys. Rev. Lett.43(1979) 103,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.103

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.43.103 1979

  48. [48]

    Axions as Dark Matter Particles

    L. D. Duffy and K. van Bibber, “Axions as dark matter particles”,New J. Phys11(2009) 105008,doi:10.1088/1367-2630/11/10/105008,arXiv:hep-ph/0904.3346

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1367-2630/11/10/105008 2009

  49. [49]

    A Theory of Dark Matter

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. P . Finkbeiner, T. R. Slatyer, and N. Weiner, “A theory of dark matter”,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 015014,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.015014, arXiv:0810.0713

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.015014 2009

  50. [50]

    Non-Abelian Dark Sectors and Their Collider Signatures

    M. Baumgart et al., “Non-Abelian dark sectors and their collider signatures”,JHEP04 (2009) 014,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/04/014,arXiv:0901.0283

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/04/014 2009

  51. [51]

    Hidden Higgs Decaying to Lepton Jets

    A. Falkowski, J. T. Ruderman, T. Volansky, and J. Zupan, “Hidden Higgs decaying to lepton jets”,JHEP05(2010) 077,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2010)077, arXiv:1002.2952

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep05(2010)077 2010

  52. [52]

    Two-real-scalar-singlet extension of the SM: LHC phenomenology and benchmark scenarios

    T. Robens, T. Stefaniak, and J. Wittbrodt, “Two-real-scalar-singlet extension of the SM: LHC phenomenology and benchmark scenarios”,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 151, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7655-x,arXiv:1908.08554

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7655-x 2020

  53. [53]

    TRSM benchmark planes - EPS-HEP2023 update

    T. Robens, “TRSM benchmark planes - EPS-HEP2023 update”, in2023 European Physical Society Conference on High Energy Physics (EPS-HEP), p. 55. 2024.arXiv:2310.18045. [PoS(EPS-HEP2023)055].doi:10.22323/1.449.0055

    work page doi:10.22323/1.449.0055 2024

  54. [54]

    Search for a massive scalar resonance decaying to a light scalar and a Higgs boson in the four b quarks final state with boosted topology

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for a massive scalar resonance decaying to a light scalar and a Higgs boson in the four b quarks final state with boosted topology”,Phys. Lett. B 842(2023) 137392,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137392,arXiv:2204.12413. References 25

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137392 2023

  55. [55]

    Search for a new resonance decaying into two spin-0 bosons in a final state with two photons and two bottom quarks in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for a new resonance decaying into two spin-0 bosons in a final state with two photons and two bottom quarks in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV”,JHEP05(2024) 316,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)316, arXiv:2310.01643

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2024)316 2024

  56. [56]

    Searches for Higgs boson production through decays of heavy resonances

    CMS Collaboration, “Searches for Higgs boson production through decays of heavy resonances”,Phys. Rept.1115(2025) 368,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.09.004, arXiv:2403.16926

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.09.004 2025

  57. [57]

    Search for decays of the Higgs boson into scalar particles decaying into four or six b-quarks using pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for decays of the Higgs boson into scalar particles decaying into four or six b-quarks using pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 072005,doi:10.1103/mzld-ldlt, arXiv:2507.01165

    work page doi:10.1103/mzld-ldlt 2025

  58. [58]

    HEPData record for this analysis, 2026.doi:10.17182/hepdata.172650

    work page doi:10.17182/hepdata.172650 2026

  59. [59]

    The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”,JINST3(2008) S08004, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08004

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/s08004 2008

  60. [60]

    Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3

    CMS Collaboration, “Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3”, JINST19(2024) P05064,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/05/P05064, arXiv:2309.05466

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/05/p05064 2024

  61. [61]

    Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST15(2020) P10017, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/P10017,arXiv:2006.10165

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/p10017 2020

  62. [62]

    The CMS trigger system

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS trigger system”,JINST12(2017) P01020, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01020,arXiv:1609.02366

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/p01020 2017

  63. [63]

    Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2”, JINST19(2024) P11021,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/11/P11021, arXiv:2410.17038

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/11/p11021 2024

  64. [64]

    Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”,JINST16(2021) P05014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/P05014,arXiv:2012.06888

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/p05014 2021

  65. [65]

    Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST13(2018) P06015, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/P06015,arXiv:1804.04528

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/p06015 2018

  66. [66]

    Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker

    CMS Collaboration, “Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker”,JINST9(2014) P10009, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/P10009,arXiv:1405.6569

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/p10009 2014

  67. [67]

    An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

    T. Sj ¨ostrand et al., “An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2”,Comput. Phys. Commun.191 (2015) 159,doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024,arXiv:1410.3012

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024 2015

  68. [68]

    GEANT4—a simulation toolkit

    GEANT4 Collaboration, “GEANT4—a simulation toolkit”,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250,doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8

    work page doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(03)01368-8 2003

  69. [69]

    Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions

    J. Alwall et al., “Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions”,Eur. Phys. J. C53(2008) 473, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0490-5,arXiv:0706.2569. 26

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0490-5 2008

  70. [70]

    NLO Higgs boson production via gluon fusion matched with shower in POWHEG

    S. Alioli, P . Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, “NLO Higgs boson production via gluon fusion matched with shower in POWHEG”,JHEP04(2009) 002, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/04/002,arXiv:0812.0578

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/04/002 2009

  71. [71]

    Higgs production via gluon fusion in the POWHEG approach in the SM and in the MSSM

    E. Bagnaschi, G. Degrassi, P . Slavich, and A. Vicini, “Higgs production via gluon fusion in the POWHEG approach in the SM and in the MSSM”,JHEP02(2012) 088, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2012)088,arXiv:1111.2854

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2012)088 2012

  72. [72]

    NLO Higgs boson production via vector-boson fusion matched with shower in POWHEG

    P . Nason and C. Oleari, “NLO Higgs boson production via vector-boson fusion matched with shower in POWHEG”,JHEP02(2010) 037,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2010)037, arXiv:0911.5299

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2010)037 2010

  73. [73]

    HW/HZ + 0 and 1 jet at NLO with the POWHEG BOX interfaced to GoSam and their merging within MiNLO

    G. Luisoni, P . Nason, C. Oleari, and F. Tramontano, “HW±/HZ + 0 and 1 jet at NLO with the POWHEG BOX interfaced to GoSam and their merging within MiNLO”,JHEP 10(2013) 083,doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2013)083,arXiv:1306.2542

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2013)083 2013

  74. [74]

    Higgs boson production in association with top quarks in the POWHEG BOX

    H. B. Hartanto, B. Jager, L. Reina, and D. Wackeroth, “Higgs boson production in association with top quarks in the POWHEG BOX”,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 094003, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.094003,arXiv:1501.04498

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.094003 2015

  75. [75]

    Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector

    D. de Florian et al., “Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 4. Deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector”, CERN Report CERN-2017-002-M, 2016. doi:10.23731/CYRM-2017-002,arXiv:1610.07922

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.23731/cyrm-2017-002 2017

  76. [76]

    An embedding technique to determine $\tau\tau$ backgrounds in proton-proton collision data

    CMS Collaboration, “An embedding technique to determineττbackgrounds in proton-proton collision data”,JINST14(2019) P06032, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/06/P06032,arXiv:1903.01216

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/06/p06032 2019

  77. [77]

    A New Method for Combining NLO QCD with Shower Monte Carlo Algorithms

    P . Nason, “A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms”,JHEP11(2004) 040,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040 2004

  78. [78]

    Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method

    S. Frixione, P . Nason, and C. Oleari, “Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method”,JHEP11(2007) 070, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070,arXiv:0709.2092

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070 2007

  79. [79]

    A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

    S. Alioli, P . Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, “A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX”,JHEP06(2010) 043,doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043,arXiv:1002.2581

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2010)043 2010

  80. [80]

    Jet pair production in POWHEG

    S. Alioli et al., “Jet pair production in POWHEG”,JHEP04(2011) 081, doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2011)081,arXiv:1012.3380

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2011)081 2011

Showing first 80 references.