pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19642 · v1 · pith:SXH6TMXYnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · ✦ hep-ph

Controlling Quantum discord and steering in Electron-Positron Annihilation Using Polarized Beams

Hong-Wei Zhang , Xu Cao , Tai-Fu Feng This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 05:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords quantum discordquantum steeringelectron-positron annihilationhyperon pairsbeam polarizationquantum correlationshigh energy physics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Beam polarization in electron-positron annihilation controls quantum discord and steering in produced hyperon-antihyperon pairs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates how longitudinal and transverse polarization of lepton beams influences quantum discord and steering in hyperon-antihyperon pairs created during high-energy electron-positron collisions. Using the joint spin density matrix of these pairs, the authors quantify how discord and steering change with the degree of beam polarization and identify angular regions where polarization strengthens these correlations. They also construct a hierarchy measure in the style of entanglement of formation to compare different quantum correlations, showing that discord survives in separable states when transverse polarization is applied. This approach treats beam polarization as a practical experimental knob for generating and studying non-classical correlations in massive two-qubit systems within particle physics.

Core claim

By computing the joint spin density matrix for hyperon-antihyperon pairs from polarized e+e- annihilation, the work demonstrates that the degree of beam polarization acts as a tunable parameter that modulates quantum discord and steering, with transverse polarization enabling discord to remain nonzero in regions of vanishing entanglement while distinct angular regimes show enhanced steering under longitudinal or transverse settings.

What carries the argument

The joint spin density matrix of the hyperon-antihyperon system, which encodes the spin correlations produced in the annihilation and permits direct numerical evaluation of discord and steering as functions of polarization degree and decay angles.

If this is right

  • Beam polarization enhances steering and discord in specific angular regimes of the produced pairs.
  • Quantum discord persists for separable states when transverse beam polarization is used.
  • A hierarchy measure allows ordering of entanglement, discord, and steering under polarized conditions.
  • Polarization provides an experimentally accessible control for preparing non-classical states in high-energy settings.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar polarization control might apply to other pair-production processes at future lepton colliders.
  • Decay correlation measurements at existing or planned experiments could test the predicted polarization sensitivities directly.
  • The method links high-energy spin observables to quantum information quantities without requiring low-energy entangled sources.

Load-bearing premise

The joint spin density matrix of the hyperon-antihyperon pairs fully captures the quantum correlations generated in the annihilation process.

What would settle it

Measure the angular dependence of quantum discord or steering extracted from hyperon decay correlations in e+e- collisions with controlled longitudinal versus transverse beam polarization at fixed center-of-mass energy and compare the observed sensitivity curves to the calculated ones.

read the original abstract

Quantum discord and steering offer crucial insights into the non-classical nature of hyperon-antihyperon pairs, a massive two-qubit system produced in high energy electron-positron annihilation. This work theoretically investigates the generation and control of these quantum correlations by leveraging longitudinal and transverse polarization of lepton beams. By exploiting the joint spin density matrix of hyperon pairs, the sensitivity of quantum discord and steering to the beam polarization degree are numerically quantified. Our analysis reveals distinct angular regimes where beam polarization can enhance steering and discord. Hierarchy of different quantum correlations are examined under the case of polarized lepton beams by constructing a measure in the spirit of entanglement of formation. It is confirmed that quantum discord remain non-zero even in regions with vanishing entanglement corresponding to separable states, controlled via transversely polarized beams. As an experimentally tunable parameter, beam polarization offers an effective means to manipulate the quantum correlation of hyperon-antihyperon systems, thereby providing a practical route for preparing and probing quantum states in high-energy particle physics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper theoretically examines the control of quantum discord and steering in hyperon-antihyperon pairs produced in electron-positron annihilation by using longitudinally and transversely polarized lepton beams. It constructs the joint spin density matrix of the pairs and performs numerical analysis to quantify the sensitivity of discord and steering to the beam polarization degree, identifying angular regimes of enhancement, examining the hierarchy of correlations via an entanglement-of-formation-inspired measure, and showing that discord remains nonzero for separable states under transverse polarization.

Significance. If the joint spin density matrix is derived from the complete set of polarization-dependent helicity amplitudes including all interference terms, the work would demonstrate a practical, experimentally accessible handle (beam polarization) for manipulating quantum correlations in a massive two-qubit system at high energies. This could bridge quantum information concepts with collider physics and offer testable predictions for future polarized-beam experiments at facilities such as Belle II or BESIII.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2, Eq. (8)] §2 (Theoretical framework), Eq. (8): the joint spin density matrix for transversely polarized beams is presented without explicit retention of all spin-dependent interference terms between helicity amplitudes arising from the virtual photon/Z propagator and the polarization vectors; this functional dependence is load-bearing for the claimed sensitivities of steering and discord, yet the derivation steps that would confirm completeness are not shown.
  2. [§3.2, Fig. 3] §3.2 (Numerical results), Fig. 3: the reported enhancement of steering in specific angular regions relies on the off-diagonal elements of the density matrix; without a cross-check against the unpolarized limit or an analytic expression for the polarization-induced change, it is unclear whether the numerical quantification reflects a first-principles effect or an artifact of the chosen amplitude truncation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] The definition of the polarization degree P_L and P_T is introduced in §2 but used with varying normalization in the subsequent figures; a single explicit equation relating P to the density-matrix elements would improve clarity.
  2. [§4] The hierarchy measure constructed in the spirit of entanglement of formation is introduced without a direct comparison to existing quantum-correlation hierarchies in the literature on hyperon pairs; adding one or two key references would strengthen the context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive comments on our manuscript. We have addressed each major point below and will incorporate the suggested clarifications and cross-checks into the revised version to strengthen the presentation of the density-matrix derivation and numerical results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§2, Eq. (8)] §2 (Theoretical framework), Eq. (8): the joint spin density matrix for transversely polarized beams is presented without explicit retention of all spin-dependent interference terms between helicity amplitudes arising from the virtual photon/Z propagator and the polarization vectors; this functional dependence is load-bearing for the claimed sensitivities of steering and discord, yet the derivation steps that would confirm completeness are not shown.

    Authors: We agree that the explicit retention of all interference terms and the derivation steps should be shown for full transparency. The joint spin density matrix in Eq. (8) was in fact constructed from the complete set of helicity amplitudes, including all spin-dependent interference contributions from the virtual photon/Z propagator and the transverse polarization vectors. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated appendix that derives the density matrix step by step, explicitly retaining every off-diagonal interference term. This will confirm that the reported sensitivities of discord and steering follow directly from the full amplitude structure rather than any truncation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.2, Fig. 3] §3.2 (Numerical results), Fig. 3: the reported enhancement of steering in specific angular regions relies on the off-diagonal elements of the density matrix; without a cross-check against the unpolarized limit or an analytic expression for the polarization-induced change, it is unclear whether the numerical quantification reflects a first-principles effect or an artifact of the chosen amplitude truncation.

    Authors: We acknowledge that an explicit cross-check would remove any ambiguity. In the revised version we will add two elements to §3.2: (i) a direct comparison of the steering measure with the unpolarized limit (polarization degree set to zero), which recovers the known results for unpolarized e^{+}e^{-} annihilation, and (ii) an analytic expression for the leading-order correction to the off-diagonal elements induced by transverse polarization. These additions will demonstrate that the angular enhancement is a genuine first-principles effect arising from the polarization-dependent interference terms. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: density matrix from polarized amplitudes yields independent correlation measures

full rationale

The paper derives the joint spin density matrix of hyperon-antihyperon pairs directly from the leading-order e+e- annihilation amplitudes that incorporate longitudinal and transverse beam polarization. Quantum discord, steering, and the constructed hierarchy measure are then evaluated as functions of this matrix and the polarization degree. These steps follow standard quantum-information protocols applied to a polarization-dependent rho; no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, no self-definition equates output to input, and no load-bearing claim reduces to a self-citation chain. The reported angular regimes and non-zero discord in separable regions emerge from explicit matrix elements rather than by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on the standard quantum-mechanical treatment of spin correlations in particle production together with polarization as an experimentally tunable input; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • beam polarization degree
    Tunable experimental parameter used to quantify sensitivity of discord and steering; its specific values are scanned numerically.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Hyperon-antihyperon pairs produced in e+e- annihilation form a two-qubit system whose correlations are fully described by the joint spin density matrix.
    Invoked to enable numerical extraction of discord and steering from polarization-dependent states.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5707 in / 1213 out tokens · 56992 ms · 2026-05-20T05:46:28.237569+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 100 canonical work pages · 30 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Aspect, P

    A. Aspect, P. Grangier and G. Roger,Experimental Tests of Realistic Local Theories via Bell’s Theorem,Phys. Rev. Lett.47(1981) 460

    work page 1981

  2. [2]

    Steering, Entanglement, Nonlocality, and the EPR Paradox

    H.M. Wiseman, S.J. Jones and A.C. Doherty,Steering, Entanglement, Nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox,Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007) 140402 [quant-ph/0612147]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  3. [3]

    Significant-loophole-free test of Bell's theorem with entangled photons

    M. Giustina et al.,Significant-Loophole-Free Test of Bell’s Theorem with Entangled Photons, Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 250401 [1511.03190]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    A.J. Barr, M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli and L. Marzola,Quantum entanglement and Bell inequality violation at colliders,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.139(2024) 104134 [2402.07972]

    work page arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Afik et al.,Quantum information meets high-energy physics: input to the update of the European strategy for particle physics,Eur

    Y. Afik et al.,Quantum information meets high-energy physics: input to the update of the European strategy for particle physics,Eur. Phys. J. Plus140(2025) 855 [2504.00086]

    work page arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Afik and J.R.M

    Y. Afik and J.R.M. de Nova,Entanglement and quantum tomography with top quarks at the LHC,Eur. Phys. J. Plus136(2021) 907 [2003.02280]

    work page arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Afik and J.R.M

    Y. Afik and J.R.M. de Nova,Quantum information with top quarks in QCD,Quantum6 (2022) 820 [2203.05582]

    work page arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    Varma and O.K

    M. Varma and O.K. Baker,Quantum entanglement in top quark pair production,Nucl. Phys. A1042(2024) 122795 [2306.07788]

    work page arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Rai and J

    S. Rai and J. Kumar,Nonlocal advantage of quantum coherence in top quarks,Phys. Rev. D 112(2025) 114043 [2505.12004]

    work page arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Aguilar-Saavedra,Postdecay quantum entanglement in top pair production,Phys

    J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra,Postdecay quantum entanglement in top pair production,Phys. Rev. D 108(2023) 076025 [2307.06991]

    work page arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Aguilar-Saavedra,A closer look at post-decayt ¯tentanglement,Phys

    J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra,A closer look at post-decayt ¯tentanglement,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 096027 [2401.10988]

    work page arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    M. Arai, K. Mawatari and N. Okada,Disentangling new physics with quantum entanglement int ¯tproduction at future lepton colliders,2604.21332

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    Ehat¨ aht, M

    K. Ehat¨ aht, M. Fabbrichesi, L. Marzola and C. Veelken,Probing entanglement and testing Bell inequality violation with e+e-→τ+τ- at Belle II,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 032005 [2311.17555]

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Ma and T

    K. Ma and T. Li,Testing Bell inequality throughh→τ τat CEPC*,Chin. Phys. C48(2024) 103105 [2309.08103]

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Lo Chiatto,Interference resurrection of theτdipole through quantum tomography,Phys

    P. Lo Chiatto,Interference resurrection of theτdipole through quantum tomography,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 015017 [2408.04553]

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Aguilar-Saavedra,Decay of entangled fermion pairs with post-selection,Phys

    J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra,Decay of entangled fermion pairs with post-selection,Phys. Lett. B848 (2024) 138409 [2308.07412]

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Violation of the Leggett-Garg Inequality in Neutrino Oscillations

    J.A. Formaggio, D.I. Kaiser, M.M. Murskyj and T.E. Weiss,Violation of the Leggett-Garg Inequality in Neutrino Oscillations,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 050402 [1602.00041]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    Bittencourt, M

    V.A.S.V. Bittencourt, M. Blasone, S. De Siena and C. Matrella,Quantifying quantumness in three-flavor neutrino oscillations,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 301 [2305.06095]. – 24 –

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Aguilar-Saavedra, A

    J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra, A. Bernal, J.A. Casas and J.M. Moreno,Testing entanglement and Bell inequalities in H→ZZ,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 016012 [2209.13441]

    work page arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Tornqvist,Suggestion for Einstein-podolsky-rosen Experiments Using Reactions Like e+e− →Λ ¯Λ→π −pπ+¯p,Found

    N.A. Tornqvist,Suggestion for Einstein-podolsky-rosen Experiments Using Reactions Like e+e− →Λ ¯Λ→π −pπ+¯p,Found. Phys.11(1981) 171

    work page 1981

  21. [21]

    Testing the Bell Inequality at Experiments of High Energy Physics

    X.-Q. Hao, H.-W. Ke, Y.-B. Ding, P.-N. Shen and X.-Q. Li,Testing the Bell Inequality at Experiments of High Energy Physics,Chin. Phys. C34(2010) 311 [0904.1000]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  22. [22]

    S. Wu, C. Qian, Q. Wang and X.-R. Zhou,Bell nonlocality and entanglement in e+e-→YY¯ at BESIII,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 054012 [2406.16298]

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    S. Wu, C. Qian, Y.-G. Yang and Q. Wang,Generalized Quantum Measurement in Spin-Correlated Hyperon-Antihyperon Decays,Chin. Phys. Lett.41(2024) 110301 [2402.16574]

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Bell nonlocality and entanglement in $\chi_{cJ}$ decays into baryon pair

    P.-C. Hong, R.-G. Ping and W.-M. Song,Bell nonlocality and entanglement inχcJ decays into a baryon pair,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 076009 [2512.22837]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    Jaloum and M

    E. Jaloum and M. Amazioug,Controlling the dynamical evolution of quantum coherence and quantum correlations in e+e-→ΛΛ¯processes at BESIII,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 016024 [2510.25615]

    work page arXiv 2026

  26. [26]

    S. Wu, C. Qian, Q. Wang and Y.-G. Yang,Quantum steering and discord in hyperon-antihyperon system in electron-positron annihilation,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 056030 [2509.14990]

    work page arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    J. Pei, L. Wu, D. Wang, X. Hao and T. Li,Unveiling a Universal Formalism for Quantum Entanglement in Arbitrary Spin Decays,2601.15748

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    J. Pei, T. Li, L. Wu, X. Hao and X. Wang,Quantum Entanglement without Spin-Analyzing Power Dependence at the Colliders,2510.08031

    work page arXiv

  29. [29]

    Fabbrichesi, R

    M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli and L. Marzola,Bell inequality is violated in charmonium decays,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 053008 [2406.17772]

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    J. Pei, X. Hao, X. Wang and T. Li,Observation of quantum entanglement inΛ ¯Λpair production via electron-positron annihilation,2505.09931

    work page arXiv

  31. [31]

    Lin, M.-J

    S.-J. Lin, M.-J. Liu, D.Y. Shao and S.-Y. Wei,Spin correlations and Bell nonlocality inΛ Λ pair production from e +e− collisions with a thrust cut,JHEP11(2025) 082 [2507.15387]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    D. Wang, X. Hao, L. Liu, L. Wu and T. Li,Determining the Spin-Analyzing Powers via Invariants of the Spin Correlation Matrices and Probing the Bell Non-Locality at the Lepton Colliders,2605.13250

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Cheng and B

    K. Cheng and B. Yan,Bell Inequality Violation of Light Quarks in Dihadron Pair Production at Lepton Colliders,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 011902 [2501.03321]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Y. Afik, Y. Kats, J.R.M. de Nova, A. Soffer and D. Uzan,Entanglement and Bell nonlocality with bottom-quark pairs at hadron colliders,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) L111902 [2406.04402]

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Fucilla and Y

    M. Fucilla and Y. Hatta,Spin-spin entanglement in diffractive heavy-quark production,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) L031504 [2509.05267]

    work page arXiv 2026

  36. [36]

    Quantum entanglement between partons in a strongly coupled quantum field theory

    W. Zhang, W. Qian, Y. Zhou, Y. Li and Q. Wang,Quantum entanglement between partons in a strongly coupled quantum field theory,2512.21228. – 25 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    W. Qi, Z. Guo and B.-W. Xiao,Studying maximal entanglement and Bell nonlocality at an electron-ion collider,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 054048 [2506.12889]

    work page arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    Cheng, T

    K. Cheng, T. Han and S. Trifinopoulos,Quantum Information at the Electron-Ion Collider, 2510.23773

    work page arXiv

  39. [39]

    Hatta and J

    Y. Hatta and J. Schoenleber,Probing quantum entanglement with generalized parton distributions at the Electron-Ion Collider,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 094016 [2511.04537]

    work page arXiv 2026

  40. [40]

    Choi, D.W

    S.Y. Choi, D.W. Kang, J.S. Lee and C.B. Park,Quantum entanglement and Bell nonlocality in top-quark pair production at a photon linear collider,2603.12830

    work page arXiv

  41. [41]

    Polarization, Maximal Concurrence, and Pure States in High-Energy Collisions

    Y.-X. Liu, L.-T. He and B.-W. Xiao,Polarization, Maximal Concurrence, and Pure States in High-Energy Collisions,2604.17756

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    S.A. Abel, M. Dittmar and H.K. Dreiner,Testing locality at colliders via Bell’s inequality?, Phys. Lett. B280(1992) 304

    work page 1992

  43. [43]

    Bell's Inequality and $\tau$-Physics at LEP

    H.K. Dreiner,Bell’s inequality and tau physics at LEP, in2nd Workshop on Tau Lepton Physics, 10, 1992 [hep-ph/9211203]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  44. [44]

    S. Li, W. Shen and J.M. Yang,Can Bell inequalities be tested via scattering cross-section at colliders ?,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 1195 [2401.01162]

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Low,Addressing local realism through Bell tests at colliders,Phys

    M. Low,Addressing local realism through Bell tests at colliders,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 096008 [2508.10979]

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Bechtle, C

    P. Bechtle, C. Breuning, H.K. Dreiner and C. Duhr,A critical appraisal of tests of locality and of entanglement versus non-entanglement at colliders,2507.15947

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    Abel, H.K

    S.A. Abel, H.K. Dreiner, R. Sengupta and L. Ubaldi,Colliders are Testing neither Locality via Bell’s Inequality nor Entanglement versus Non-Entanglement,2507.15949

    work page arXiv

  48. [48]

    T. Ai, Q. Bi, Y. He, J. Liu and X.-P. Wang,Ultimate Quantum Precision Limit at Colliders: Conditions and Case Studies,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 241804 [2506.10673]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    J. Pei, L. Wu, T. Li and X. Hao,Excluding Local Hidden Variables inΛ ¯ΛProduction: The Incompatibility with Angular-Momentum Conservation and CPT Invariance,2601.15747. [50]ATLAScollaboration,Observation of quantum entanglement with top quarks at the ATLAS detector,Nature633(2024) 542 [2311.07288]. [51]CMScollaboration,Observation of quantum entanglement ...

    work page arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Entanglement Suppression and Emergent Symmetries of Strong Interactions

    S.R. Beane, D.B. Kaplan, N. Klco and M.J. Savage,Entanglement Suppression and Emergent Symmetries of Strong Interactions,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 102001 [1812.03138]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  51. [51]

    Maximal Entanglement in High Energy Physics

    A. Cervera-Lierta, J.I. Latorre, J. Rojo and L. Rottoli,Maximal Entanglement in High Energy Physics,SciPost Phys.3(2017) 036 [1703.02989]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  52. [52]

    Deep inelastic scattering as a probe of entanglement

    D.E. Kharzeev and E.M. Levin,Deep inelastic scattering as a probe of entanglement,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 114008 [1702.03489]. – 26 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  53. [53]

    Quantum entanglement in electron-nucleus collisions: Role of the linearly polarized gluon distribution

    M. Fucilla, Y. Hatta and B.-W. Xiao,Quantum entanglement in electron-nucleus collisions: Role of the linearly polarized gluon distribution,2604.11697

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    C. Qian, S. Xu, Y.-G. Yang and X. Zhao,Spin entanglement signatures of proton from a light-front Hamiltonian,2603.16681

    work page arXiv

  55. [55]

    Dumitru and E

    A. Dumitru and E. Kolbusz,Quantum entanglement correlations in double quark PDFs,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 114033 [2501.12312]

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    C. Qian, S. Xu, Y.-G. Yang and X. Zhao,Quark and gluon entanglement in the proton based on a light-front Hamiltonian,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 014004 [2412.11860]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Aguilar-Saavedra and J.A

    J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra and J.A. Casas,Entanglement Autodistillation from Particle Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 111801 [2401.06854]

    work page arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    H.-L. Feng, H. Tang, W.-z. Guo and Q. Qin,Quantum entanglement autodistillation in baryon pair decays,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 036020 [2504.15798]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    C. Li, X. Cao, A.-Q. Guo, C.-X. Yu, H.-W. Zhang and Z. Zhang,Entanglement redistribution of hyperon-antihyperon pair via sequential decay,2602.10398

    work page arXiv

  60. [60]

    Chen and J.-J

    C. Chen and J.-J. Xie,Spin polarization and quantum entanglement of baryon-antibaryon pairs produced in electron-positron annihilation,2603.24011

    work page arXiv

  61. [61]

    Y.-C. Guo, T. Han, M. Low and Y. Su,Quantum Tomography of Fermion Pairs ine +e− Collisions: Longitudinal Beam Polarization Effects,2602.02719

    work page arXiv

  62. [62]

    Altakach, P

    M.M. Altakach, P. Lamba, F. Maltoni and K. Sakurai,Quantum properties of heavy-fermion pairs at a lepton collider with polarised beams,2601.09558

    work page arXiv

  63. [63]

    Zhang, X

    H.-W. Zhang, X. Cao and T.-F. Feng,Manipulating Bell nonlocality and entanglement in polarized electron-positron annihilation,2602.10389

    work page arXiv

  64. [64]

    Y.-J. Fang, A. Bhoonah, K. Cheng, T. Han, Y. Liu and H. Zhang,Spin Correlation and Quantum Entanglement of Fermion Pairs in Transversely Polarizede −e+ Collisions, 2604.11887

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  65. [65]

    Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits

    W.K. Wootters,Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits,Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998) 2245 [quant-ph/9709029]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  66. [66]

    A computable measure of entanglement

    G. Vidal and R.F. Werner,Computable measure of entanglement,Phys. Rev. A65(2002) 032314 [quant-ph/0102117]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  67. [67]

    Separability of Mixed States: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions

    M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki and R. Horodecki,On the necessary and sufficient conditions for separability of mixed quantum states,Phys. Lett. A223(1996) 1 [quant-ph/9605038]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  68. [68]

    Schr¨ odinger,Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems,Math

    E. Schr¨ odinger,Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems,Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc.31(2008) 555

    work page 2008

  69. [69]

    Einstein, B

    A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen,Can quantum mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?,Phys. Rev.47(1935) 777

    work page 1935

  70. [70]

    Reid,Demonstration of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox using nondegenerate parametric amplification,Phys

    M.D. Reid,Demonstration of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox using nondegenerate parametric amplification,Phys. Rev. A40(1989) 913

    work page 1989

  71. [71]

    A. Bera, T. Das, D. Sadhukhan, S. Singha Roy, A. Sen(De) and U. Sen,Quantum discord and its allies: a review of recent progress,Rept. Prog. Phys.81(2018) 024001 [1703.10542]. – 27 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  72. [72]

    Uola, A.C

    R. Uola, A.C. . Costa, H.C. Nguyen and O. G¨ uhne,Quantum steering,Rev. Mod. Phys.92 (2020) 015001 [1903.06663]

    work page arXiv 2020

  73. [73]

    Introducing Quantum Discord

    H. Ollivier and W.H. Zurek,Introducing Quantum Discord,Phys. Rev. Lett.88(2001) 017901 [quant-ph/0105072]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  74. [74]

    Classical, quantum and total correlations

    L. Henderson and V. Vedral,Classical, quantum and total correlations,J. Phys. A34(2001) 6899 [quant-ph/0105028]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  75. [75]

    Quantum Nonlocality without Entanglement

    C.H. Bennett, D.P. DiVincenzo, C.A. Fuchs, T. Mor, E. Rains, P.W. Shor et al.,Quantum nonlocality without entanglement,Phys. Rev. A59(1999) 1070 [quant-ph/9804053]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  76. [76]

    Afik and J.R.M

    Y. Afik and J.R.M. de Nova,Quantum Discord and Steering in Top Quarks at the LHC,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 221801 [2209.03969]

    work page arXiv 2023

  77. [77]

    T. Han, M. Low, N. McGinnis and S. Su,Measuring quantum discord at the LHC,JHEP05 (2025) 081 [2412.21158]

    work page arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    Fano,Pairs of two-level systems,Rev

    U. Fano,Pairs of two-level systems,Rev. Mod. Phys.55(1983) 855

    work page 1983

  79. [79]

    Polarization observables in $e^+e^-$ annihilation to a baryon-antibaryon pair

    E. Perotti, G. F¨ aldt, A. Kupsc, S. Leupold and J.J. Song,Polarization observables ine +e− annihilation to a baryon-antibaryon pair,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 056008 [1809.04038]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  80. [80]

    Batozskaya, A

    V. Batozskaya, A. Kupsc, N. Salone and J. Wiechnik,Semileptonic decays of spin-entangled baryon-antibaryon pairs,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 016011 [2302.07665]

    work page arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.