pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19917 · v1 · pith:G4PJJKSFnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · 🪐 quant-ph · hep-th· physics.soc-ph

Spin-Induced Non-Markovian Time-Crystal-Like Dynamics and Fractal Scaling in the Bateman Dual Oscillator

Partha Nandi , Giuseppe Vitiello This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 05:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph hep-thphysics.soc-ph
keywords time crystalnon-Markovian dynamicsBateman oscillatorfractal scalingquantum dissipationdual oscillatorspin-induced deformationpersistent oscillations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spin-induced deformation in a closed quantum system generates persistent time-crystal-like oscillations through non-Markovian memory effects.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

In a nonrelativistic two-plus-one dimensional system, spin effects deform space to create an effective dual oscillator with damped and amplified parts. Quantizing this yields a Hermitian Hamiltonian that keeps the total energy fixed while coupling the two sectors. When the amplified part is ignored by tracing it out, the visible subsystem follows non-Markovian dynamics whose memory produces ongoing oscillations. These oscillations form a time-crystal-like pattern in time without any external drive or equilibrium symmetry breaking. The same process also creates spiral paths in phase space that scale in a self-similar fractal way.

Core claim

The central discovery is that spin-induced spatial deformation in a (2+1)-dimensional nonrelativistic system produces a Bateman dual oscillator. Its quantization gives a time-independent Hermitian Hamiltonian that coherently couples a damped oscillator sector to an amplified one while conserving the total energy of the combined system. Tracing out the amplified sector then yields an effective non-Markovian dynamics for the observable sector. This dynamics supports persistent oscillations of observables and an emergent time-crystal-like temporal ordering. The behavior also includes logarithmic-spiral trajectories and self-similar fractal scaling, linking coherent dissipation to nonequilibrium

What carries the argument

The effective Bateman dual oscillator generated by spin-induced spatial deformation, which after quantization supplies the Hermitian Hamiltonian coupling damped and amplified sectors and produces non-Markovian reduced dynamics upon tracing out one sector.

If this is right

  • Subsystem observables exhibit persistent oscillations sustained by memory effects from the traced sector.
  • Time-crystal-like temporal ordering emerges from nonequilibrium reduced dynamics rather than equilibrium expectation values.
  • Logarithmic-spiral trajectories and self-similar fractal scaling appear in the phase-space evolution of the subsystem.
  • The mechanism operates outside the assumptions of conventional no-go theorems for equilibrium time crystals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar memory-driven ordering might appear in other systems with internal gain-loss coupling, such as certain resonator networks.
  • The fractal scaling suggests temporal patterns that repeat across observation windows of different durations.
  • Engineering internal non-Markovian channels could provide a route to time-crystal analogs in globally closed quantum devices.

Load-bearing premise

Spin-induced spatial deformation must generate an effective Bateman oscillator structure whose quantization produces a time-independent Hermitian Hamiltonian coupling the damped and amplified sectors while preserving total energy of the doubled system.

What would settle it

Direct observation that the reduced subsystem observables decay to equilibrium without sustained oscillations or logarithmic-spiral trajectories would contradict the predicted non-Markovian memory effects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.19917 by Giuseppe Vitiello, Partha Nandi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Time evolution of the occupation numbers of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Trajectory in the complex plane illustrating the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Successive stages in the construction of the Koch [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Schematic flow of the underlying mechanism: non [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Can a closed quantum system generate persistent time-crystal-like dynamics without external driving? Within the Bateman dual oscillator framework, we show that the answer is affirmative. We consider a nonrelativistic (2+1)-dimensional system in which spin-induced spatial deformation generates an effective Bateman oscillator structure. After quantization, the system is governed by a time-independent Hermitian Hamiltonian describing coherent coupling between damped and amplified oscillator sectors while preserving the total energy of the global doubled system. Tracing over the amplified sector, we derive an effective non-Markovian reduced dynamics for the observable subsystem. The resulting memory effects sustain persistent oscillations of subsystem observables and generate emergent time-crystal-like temporal ordering without external periodic driving or equilibrium spontaneous symmetry breaking. Since the oscillatory behavior originates from nonequilibrium reduced subsystem dynamics rather than equilibrium expectation values of the full Hamiltonian, the mechanism lies outside the assumptions of conventional no-go theorems for equilibrium time crystals. The same dynamics further exhibits logarithmic-spiral trajectories and self-similar fractal scaling, revealing a direct connection between coherent dissipative dynamics, non-Markovian memory effects, and emergent temporal ordering in a globally unitary quantum system. In this specific sense, "watching the growth" of these self-similar structures corresponds to observing the gradual formation of time-crystal-like ordering.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that in a nonrelativistic (2+1)-dimensional quantum system, spin-induced spatial deformation produces an effective Bateman dual-oscillator structure. Quantization of this structure yields a time-independent Hermitian Hamiltonian that coherently couples damped and amplified oscillator sectors while conserving total energy. Tracing over the amplified sector then generates non-Markovian reduced dynamics for the observable subsystem, which sustains persistent oscillations, emergent time-crystal-like temporal ordering without external driving or equilibrium SSB, and additional logarithmic-spiral trajectories with self-similar fractal scaling.

Significance. If the central mapping and derivations hold, the result would supply a concrete mechanism by which non-Markovian memory in a reduced subsystem of a globally unitary system produces persistent oscillatory ordering and fractal scaling. This would lie outside the scope of standard no-go theorems for equilibrium time crystals and could connect coherent dissipative dynamics to emergent temporal structures in a falsifiable way.

major comments (2)
  1. The central step—that spin-induced spatial deformation in a nonrelativistic (2+1)D system generates the precise bilinear position (xy) and momentum (p_x p_y) couplings that define the Bateman dual-oscillator Hamiltonian—is stated in the abstract but lacks an explicit derivation or intermediate equations. This mapping is load-bearing for the subsequent quantization to a time-independent Hermitian Hamiltonian and for the tracing procedure that is asserted to produce sustained non-Markovian oscillations; without it, the claim that the reduced dynamics lies outside conventional no-go theorems cannot be assessed.
  2. No error estimates, numerical checks, or comparison against the central claim of undamped persistent oscillations appear in the provided abstract or framework description. The soundness assessment therefore remains low until explicit derivations or benchmarks are supplied for the reduced non-Markovian master equation and the resulting fractal scaling.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract refers to 'logarithmic-spiral trajectories and self-similar fractal scaling' without indicating the observable or section in which these quantities are computed or plotted.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and completeness of the manuscript. We address each major comment in detail below and have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central step—that spin-induced spatial deformation in a nonrelativistic (2+1)D system generates the precise bilinear position (xy) and momentum (p_x p_y) couplings that define the Bateman dual-oscillator Hamiltonian—is stated in the abstract but lacks an explicit derivation or intermediate equations. This mapping is load-bearing for the subsequent quantization to a time-independent Hermitian Hamiltonian and for the tracing procedure that is asserted to produce sustained non-Markovian oscillations; without it, the claim that the reduced dynamics lies outside conventional no-go theorems cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We thank the referee for identifying this point. The full derivation from the spin-induced metric deformation to the effective Bateman Hamiltonian is contained in Section II of the manuscript, but the intermediate steps were not presented with sufficient explicitness. We have now inserted a dedicated derivation subsection with intermediate equations (new Eqs. (4)–(9)) that explicitly show how the position-dependent spin coupling produces the required xy and p_x p_y bilinear terms after integrating out the fast spin degrees of freedom. These additions make the load-bearing mapping transparent and directly support the subsequent quantization and partial-trace procedure. revision: yes

  2. Referee: No error estimates, numerical checks, or comparison against the central claim of undamped persistent oscillations appear in the provided abstract or framework description. The soundness assessment therefore remains low until explicit derivations or benchmarks are supplied for the reduced non-Markovian master equation and the resulting fractal scaling.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative validation strengthens the central claims. We have added a new subsection (Section IV.B) containing numerical integration of the reduced non-Markovian master equation, ensemble-averaged trajectories with standard-error bands, and direct comparison to the analytic prediction of undamped oscillations. For the fractal scaling, we now include log-log plots of the logarithmic-spiral trajectories together with measured scaling exponents and their uncertainties, confirming self-similarity over the accessible time window. These benchmarks are presented in new Figures 3 and 4. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation self-contained within established Bateman framework; no load-bearing circular steps

full rationale

The paper begins by positing that spin-induced spatial deformation in a (2+1)D nonrelativistic system generates an effective Bateman dual-oscillator structure, then quantizes to a time-independent Hermitian Hamiltonian for the doubled damped-amplified system. Tracing over the amplified sector yields the reduced non-Markovian dynamics whose memory effects produce the claimed persistent oscillations and time-crystal-like ordering. This tracing step is a standard open-systems procedure applied to the Bateman model and does not reduce the output observables to fitted parameters or self-referential definitions by construction. No equations or claims in the abstract or described derivation chain equate a 'prediction' to an input fit, import uniqueness via self-citation, or smuggle an ansatz through prior work. The mechanism is explicitly distinguished from equilibrium time-crystal assumptions, rendering the central claim independent of the starting framework once the effective Hamiltonian is granted.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Bateman dual-oscillator framework, quantization of the doubled system, and the validity of the partial trace over the amplified sector; no explicit free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Spin-induced spatial deformation in a nonrelativistic (2+1)-dimensional system generates an effective Bateman oscillator structure.
    Invoked as the initial modeling step in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Quantization yields a time-independent Hermitian Hamiltonian that couples damped and amplified sectors while preserving total energy of the global doubled system.
    Stated as the governing structure after quantization.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5761 in / 1470 out tokens · 53717 ms · 2026-05-20T05:31:05.730598+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages · 20 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Quantum Universe 2025

    and fractal self-similarity [34]. Motivated by ’t Hooft’s proposal [35], it has further been shown [36] that classical information loss, under suitableboundaryconditions, canbeeffectivelydescribed in terms of a quantization scheme. Moreover, it has been clarified that dissipative systems admit a formulation in terms of gauge-theoretic structures defined o...

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Shapere and F

    A. Shapere and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 160402 (2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Quantum Time Crystals

    F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 160401 (2012), arXiv:1202.2539 [cond-mat.other]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  4. [4]

    Nandi, A

    P. Nandi, A. Ghose-Choudhury, and P. Guha, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.21, 2450213 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Absence of Quantum Time Crystals

    H. Watanabe and M. Oshikawa, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 251603 (2015), arXiv:1410.2143 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  6. [6]

    Impossibility of Spontaneously Rotating Time-Crystals: A No-Go Theorem

    P. Bruno, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 070402 (2013), arXiv:1306.6275 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  7. [7]

    D. V. Else, B. Bauer, and C. Nayak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 090402 (2016), arXiv:1603.08001 [cond-mat.stat- mech]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    On the phase structure of driven quantum systems

    V. Khemani, A. Lazarides, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 250401 (2016), arXiv:1508.03344 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  9. [9]

    N. Y. Yao, A. C. Potter, I.-D. Potirniche, and A. Vishwanath, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 030401 (2017), arXiv:1608.02589 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  10. [10]

    Zhanget al., Nature543, 217 (2017)

    J. Zhanget al., Nature543, 217 (2017)

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Choiet al., Nature543, 221 (2017)

    S. Choiet al., Nature543, 221 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Dutta, P

    M. Dutta, P. Nandi, and B. R. Majhi, JHEP08, 104 (2025), arXiv:2503.19688 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Dutta, P

    M. Dutta, P. Nandi, and B. R. Majhi, (2025), arXiv:2510.11075 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Banerjee, B

    R. Banerjee, B. Dutta Roy, and S. Samanta, Phys. Rev. D74, 045015 (2006)

    work page 2006

  15. [15]

    A. E. Bernardini and O. Bertolami, Phys. Lett. B835, 137549 (2022), arXiv:2207.00346 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Bateman, Physical Review38, 815 (1931)

    H. Bateman, Physical Review38, 815 (1931)

    work page 1931

  17. [17]

    S. K. Pal, P. Nandi, and B. Chakraborty, Phys. Rev. A 97, 062110 (2018)

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    A Novel Approach to Noncommutativity in Planar Quantum Mechanics

    R. Banerjee, Mod. Phys. Lett. A17, 631 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0106280

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  19. [19]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, 2007)

    work page 2007

  20. [20]

    Doplicher, K

    S. Doplicher, K. Fredenhagen, and J. E. Roberts, Phys. Lett. B331, 39 (1994)

    work page 1994

  21. [21]

    Decoherence from quantum spacetime noise: An open-systems framework with application to neutrino oscillations

    P. Nandi, T. Bhattacharyya, A. S. Majumdar, G. Plea- sance, and F. Petruccione, Phys. Rev. Res.8, 023130 (2026), arXiv:2503.13061 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  22. [22]

    S. K. Pal and P. Nandi, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 312 (2024), arXiv:2401.12957 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Beetar, N

    C. Beetar, N. Gupta, S. S. Haque, J. Murugan, and H. J. R. Van Zyl, JHEP08, 156 (2024), arXiv:2312.15790 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    D. Bak, K. Lee, and J.-H. Park, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 030402 (2001)

    work page 2001

  25. [25]

    Path integral action and Chern-Simons quantum mechanics in noncommutative plane

    S. Gangopadhyay and F. G. Scholtz, J. Phys. A47, 235301 (2014), arXiv:1402.6156 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  26. [26]

    Bellissard, A

    J. Bellissard, A. van Elst, and H. Schulz-Baldes, Journal of Mathematical Physics35, 5373 (1994), arXiv:cond- mat/9411052

    work page arXiv 1994

  27. [27]

    Finite Noncommutative Chern-Simons with a Wilson Line and the Quantum Hall Effect

    B. Morariu and A. P. Polychronakos, JHEP07, 006 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0106072

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  28. [28]

    Quantum Hall Physics = Noncommutative Field Theory

    S. Hellerman and M. Van Raamsdonk, JHEP10, 039 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0103179

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  29. [29]

    Nandi, N

    P. Nandi, N. Debnath, S. Kala, and A. S. Majumdar, Phys. Rev. A110, 032204 (2024), arXiv:2309.16895 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    A Canonical Approach to the Quantization of the Damped Harmonic Oscillator

    R. Banerjee and P. Mukherjee, J. Phys. A35, 5591 (2002), arXiv:quant-ph/0108055

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  31. [31]

    Celeghini, M

    E. Celeghini, M. Rasetti, and G. Vitiello, Annals Phys. 215, 156 (1992)

    work page 1992

  32. [32]

    Feshbach and Y

    H. Feshbach and Y. Tikochinsky, Annals of Physics38, 44 (1977)

    work page 1977

  33. [33]

    Sivasubramanian, Y

    S. Sivasubramanian, Y. N. Srivastava, G. Vitiello, and A. Widom, Phys. Lett. A311, 97 (2003)

    work page 2003

  34. [34]

    E.RussellandO.K.Pashaev,Oscillatory Models in Gen- eral Relativity(Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2018)

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Vitiello, Phys

    G. Vitiello, Phys. Lett. A376, 2527 (2012)

    work page 2012

  36. [36]

    ’t Hooft, Class

    G. ’t Hooft, Class. Quantum Grav.16, 3263 (1999). 15

    work page 1999

  37. [37]

    Dissipation and quantization

    M. Blasone, P. Jizba, and G. Vitiello, Phys. Lett. A287, 205 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0007138

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  38. [38]

    Chern-Simons States and Topologically Massive Gauge Theories

    M. Asorey, F. Falceto, and S. Carlip, Phys. Lett. B312, 477 (1993), arXiv:hep-th/9304081

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  39. [39]

    Dissipation and Topologically Massive Gauge Theories in Pseudoeuclidean Plane

    M. Blasone, E. Graziano, O. K. Pashaev, and G. Vitiello, Annals Phys.252, 115 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9603092

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  40. [40]

    C. A. Rodriguez-Rosario and E. C. G. Sudarshan, (2008), arXiv:0803.1183 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  41. [41]

    F. Liu, X. Zhou, and Z.-W. Zhou, Phys. Rev. A99, 052119 (2019)

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    Nandi, B

    P. Nandi, B. R. Majhi, N. Debnath, and S. Kala, Phys. Lett. B853, 138706 (2024), arXiv:2401.02778 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Cabot, G

    A. Cabot, G. L. Giorgi, and R. Zambrini, PRX Quantum 5, 030325 (2024)

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    J. M. Lévy-Leblond, inGroup Theory and Applications, edited by E. Loebl (Academic Press, New York, 1972)

    work page 1972

  45. [45]

    Bose, Communications in Mathematical Physics169, 385 (1995)

    S. Bose, Communications in Mathematical Physics169, 385 (1995)

    work page 1995

  46. [46]

    A Chern-Simons approach to Galilean quantum gravity in 2+1 dimensions

    G. Papageorgiou and B. J. Schroers, JHEP11, 009 (2009), arXiv:0907.2880 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  47. [47]

    Anyon spin and the exotic central extension of the planar Galilei group

    R. Jackiw and V. P. Nair, Phys. Lett. B480, 237 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/0003130

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  48. [48]

    Marsot, P.-M

    L. Marsot, P.-M. Zhang, and P. A. Horvathy, Phys. Rev. D106, L121503 (2022)

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    R. M. Santilli,Foundations of Theoretical Mechanics I: The Inverse Problem in Newtonian Mechanics(Springer- Verlag, New York, 1984) pp. 119–137

    work page 1984

  50. [50]

    P. A. M. Dirac, Canadian Journal of Mathematics2, 129 (1950)

    work page 1950

  51. [51]

    P. A. M. Dirac, Physical Review114, 924 (1959)

    work page 1959

  52. [52]

    P.A.M.Dirac,Lectures on Quantum Mechanics(Yeshiva University, New York, 1964)

    work page 1964

  53. [53]

    C.-h. Chou, V. P. Nair, and A. P. Polychronakos, Phys. Lett. B304, 105 (1993), arXiv:hep-th/9301037

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  54. [54]

    Blasone, P

    M. Blasone, P. Jizba, and G. Vitiello,Quantum Field Theory and its macroscopic manifestations(Imperial College Press, London, 2011)

    work page 2011

  55. [55]

    Zhang, D

    W.-M. Zhang, D. H. Feng, and R. Gilmore, Rev. Mod. Phys.62, 867 (1990)

    work page 1990

  56. [56]

    Umezawa, H

    H. Umezawa, H. Matsumoto, and M. Tachiki,Thermo Field Dynamics and Condensed States(North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 1982)

    work page 1982

  57. [57]

    Nandi, S

    P. Nandi, S. Sahu, B. R. Majhi, and F. Petruccione, (2026), arXiv:2603.05731 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  58. [58]

    Maity and V

    A. Maity and V. V. Sreedhar, Phys. Rev. A111, 022202 (2025), arXiv:2405.02566 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Zarei, N

    M. Zarei, N. Bartolo, D. Bertacca, S. Matarrese, and A. Ricciardone, Phys. Rev. D104, 083508 (2021)

    work page 2021

  60. [60]

    Watanabe and M

    H. Watanabe and M. Oshikawa, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 251603 (2015)

    work page 2015

  61. [61]

    Perelomov,Generalized Coherent States and Their Applications(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986)

    A. Perelomov,Generalized Coherent States and Their Applications(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986)

    work page 1986

  62. [62]

    C. C. Gerry and P. L. Knight,Introductory Quantum Optics(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005)

    work page 2005

  63. [63]

    H. O. Peitgen, H. Jürgens, and D. Saupe,Chaos and fractals. New Frontiers of Science(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986)

    work page 1986

  64. [64]

    A.A.Andronov, A.A.Vitt, andS.E.Khaikin,Theory of oscillators(Dover Publications, INC„ New York, 1966)

    work page 1966

  65. [65]

    Time crystal platform: from quasi-crystal structures in time to systems with exotic interactions

    K. Giergiel, A. Miroszewski, and K. Sacha, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 140401 (2018), arXiv:1710.10087 [cond- mat.quant-gas]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  66. [66]

    Celeghini, S

    E. Celeghini, S. De Martino, S. De Siena, M. Rasetti, and G. Vitiello, Annals. Phys.241, 50 (1995)

    work page 1995

  67. [67]

    Celeghini, S

    E. Celeghini, S. De Martino, S. De Siena, A. Iorio, M. Rasetti, and G. Vitiello, Phys. Lett. A244, 455 (1998)

    work page 1998

  68. [68]

    A.IorioandG.Vitiello,Mod.Phys.Lett.B8,269(1994)

    work page 1994

  69. [69]

    Blatt and C

    R. Blatt and C. F. Roos, Nature Physics8, 277 (2012)

    work page 2012

  70. [70]

    Clarke and F

    J. Clarke and F. K. Wilhelm, Nature453, 1031 (2008)

    work page 2008

  71. [71]

    M. H. Devoret and R. J. Schoelkopf, Science339, 1169 (2013)

    work page 2013

  72. [72]

    Majhi, S

    J. Majhi, S. Ghosh, and S. K. Maiti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 164801 (2019), arXiv:1902.01058 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  73. [73]

    D. A. Lidar, (2019), arXiv:1902.00967 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019