pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20524 · v1 · pith:RU4XVC25new · submitted 2026-05-19 · 🌀 gr-qc

Light Deflection due to Spinoptic Effects in Parametrized and Spherically Symmetric Hairy Black Holes

Kelvin S. Alves , Rogerio T. Cavalcanti , Santiago E. Perez Bergliaffa This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 06:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords light deflectionspinopticsblack holesRezzolla-Zhidenko parametrizationhairy black holesgravitational decouplinghelicity-curvature interaction
0
0 comments X

The pith

The helicity-curvature interaction produces an out-of-plane deflection of light near parametrized and hairy black holes that carries imprints of the metric parameters.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies how the helicity of light interacts with spacetime curvature to alter light paths around black holes. In the usual geometric optics limit, light follows planar geodesics, but adding the helicity effect creates a deflection perpendicular to the original plane. The authors apply the spinoptics formalism to the Rezzolla-Zhidenko parametrized metric and to a hairy regular black hole obtained through gravitational decoupling. Their calculations show that the deflection angle depends on the specific coefficients in the parametrized metric and on the hairy parameter. A sympathetic reader would care because these dependencies could allow observations of bent light to distinguish between different black hole models.

Core claim

In the spinoptics formalism, the interaction between the helicity of light and the curvature of spherically symmetric black hole backgrounds induces a significant angular deflection out of the geodesic plane. For the Rezzolla-Zhidenko parametrized metric this deflection carries clear imprints of the parametrization coefficients, and for a hairy regular black hole solution it carries imprints of the hairy parameter. The Rezzolla-Zhidenko parametrization can approximate the hairy black hole, but only within limits of validity.

What carries the argument

the spinoptics formalism, which adds the helicity-curvature interaction to the light propagation equations and thereby generates the out-of-plane deflection component

If this is right

  • The deflection angle exhibits explicit dependence on the Rezzolla-Zhidenko parametrization coefficients.
  • The hairy black hole parameter produces a measurable effect on the out-of-plane deflection.
  • The Rezzolla-Zhidenko parametrization approximates the hairy black hole solution only within certain ranges of validity.
  • These spinoptic effects supply observable imprints that can be used to probe the underlying black hole geometry.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Precision measurements of light deflection in strong gravity could eventually constrain the values of the RZ coefficients or the hairy parameter.
  • The same helicity-curvature mechanism might appear in other wave phenomena propagating near black holes.
  • Extending the calculation to rotating or non-spherically symmetric spacetimes would test how general the out-of-plane effect remains.
  • This approach could be combined with black hole shadow observations to cross-check parameter estimates.

Load-bearing premise

The spinoptics formalism accurately captures the helicity-curvature interaction and resulting out-of-plane deflection in these spherically symmetric backgrounds without requiring higher-order corrections or additional assumptions about the light propagation.

What would settle it

A high-resolution measurement of light paths near a black hole that shows no out-of-plane deflection component or no dependence on the metric parameters would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.20524 by Kelvin S. Alves, Rogerio T. Cavalcanti, Santiago E. Perez Bergliaffa.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In the standard geometric optics approximation, null rays propagating in a spherically symmetric black hole background follow planar geodesics. This picture changes, however, when the helicity-dependent effects of light are incorporated into the dynamics. Specifically, the interaction between the helicity of light and the spacetime curvature induces a significant angular deflection out of the geodesic plane. In this paper, we employ the spinoptics formalism to study light deflection due to the helicity-curvature interaction in two spherically symmetric geometries: the Rezzolla--Zhidenko (RZ) parametrized metric, and a hairy regular black hole solution obtained via gravitational decoupling. Our results reveal clear imprints of both the RZ parametrization coefficients and the hairy black hole parameter on the deflection angle. Furthermore, we assess the viability of using the RZ parametrization to mimic the regular hairy black hole, discussing the validity and limitations of such an approximation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies the spinoptics formalism to compute the helicity-dependent out-of-plane light deflection in the Rezzolla-Zhidenko (RZ) parametrized spherically symmetric black-hole metric and in a hairy regular black-hole solution obtained via gravitational decoupling. It reports that the deflection angle exhibits clear dependence on the RZ coefficients and the hairy parameter, and evaluates whether the RZ parametrization can approximate the hairy solution.

Significance. If the central calculations hold, the work demonstrates that spinoptic corrections can produce observable parameter imprints in non-Schwarzschild spherically symmetric geometries, offering a potential probe of deviations from general relativity in strong-field light propagation. The dual-model comparison is a positive feature. However, the significance is limited by the unresolved question of whether the standard spinoptics transport law remains unmodified when the background metric is replaced by a parametrized or decoupled solution.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3 and §4] §3 (Spinoptics formalism) and §4 (Application to RZ metric): The manuscript inserts the RZ metric directly into the standard spinoptics equations of motion without re-deriving the helicity-curvature coupling term. Because the Riemann components that enter the spin-curvature force are altered by the RZ coefficients, it is unclear whether the reported deflection-angle dependence on those coefficients is an artifact of an unmodified transport law derived for the Schwarzschild case. This directly affects the central claim of 'clear imprints'.
  2. [§5] §5 (Hairy black-hole application): The same insertion of the hairy metric into the unmodified spinoptics equations is performed. The paper does not demonstrate that the effective force term or parallel-transport correction remains valid when the metric is obtained by gravitational decoupling rather than being a vacuum solution; this is load-bearing for the reported parameter dependence of the deflection angle.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'clear imprints' are revealed, yet the quantitative size of the out-of-plane deflection relative to the in-plane geodesic deflection is not stated; a single sentence giving the typical magnitude would improve clarity.
  2. [§2] Notation for the RZ coefficients (a_i, b_i) and the hairy parameter is introduced without an explicit table of their physical ranges or degeneracy relations; this should be added for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. The points raised concerning the applicability of the spinoptics formalism to the Rezzolla-Zhidenko and hairy black-hole metrics are important, and we address them directly below. We will revise the manuscript to include additional clarifications on the generality of the formalism.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3 and §4] §3 (Spinoptics formalism) and §4 (Application to RZ metric): The manuscript inserts the RZ metric directly into the standard spinoptics equations of motion without re-deriving the helicity-curvature coupling term. Because the Riemann components that enter the spin-curvature force are altered by the RZ coefficients, it is unclear whether the reported deflection-angle dependence on those coefficients is an artifact of an unmodified transport law derived for the Schwarzschild case. This directly affects the central claim of 'clear imprints'.

    Authors: The spinoptics equations are formulated in a metric-independent manner, with the helicity-curvature interaction expressed through the Riemann tensor computed from the background metric. For the RZ parametrization, we explicitly evaluate the relevant Riemann components using the given line element and its free coefficients; the resulting deflection-angle dependence therefore originates from the modified curvature rather than from an assumption specific to Schwarzschild. We recognize that an explicit statement of this generality would strengthen the presentation. In the revised manuscript we will expand the discussion in §3 to note that the transport law follows from the general geometric coupling and applies to any spherically symmetric metric once its curvature tensors are determined. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§5] §5 (Hairy black-hole application): The same insertion of the hairy metric into the unmodified spinoptics equations is performed. The paper does not demonstrate that the effective force term or parallel-transport correction remains valid when the metric is obtained by gravitational decoupling rather than being a vacuum solution; this is load-bearing for the reported parameter dependence of the deflection angle.

    Authors: The hairy metric is a concrete, regular solution whose line element is fully specified; the spinoptics equations depend only on the metric and its derived curvature tensors, not on the vacuum Einstein equations or the particular matter content that generated the solution. Consequently, the parameter dependence of the deflection angle follows directly from the geometry obtained via gravitational decoupling. To address the concern, we will add a short paragraph in §5 clarifying that the formalism is geometric and remains applicable to metrics constructed by decoupling, provided the metric itself is used to compute the Riemann tensor. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard spinoptics applied to independent metrics

full rationale

The derivation inserts the Rezzolla-Zhidenko parametrized metric and the hairy black hole solution into the established spinoptics transport equations to compute out-of-plane deflection angles. No parameters are fitted to the target deflection data, no self-citation supplies the load-bearing uniqueness or ansatz for the helicity-curvature coupling, and the reported imprints of the RZ coefficients and hairy parameter are direct numerical outputs rather than identities or renamings. The central claim therefore remains independent of the paper's own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of spinoptics to these metrics and the validity of the chosen black hole solutions as inputs; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • RZ parametrization coefficients
    Coefficients in the Rezzolla-Zhidenko metric that control deviations and appear in the deflection results.
  • hairy black hole parameter
    Parameter arising from gravitational decoupling that imprints on the deflection angle.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Spinoptics formalism applies without modification to the helicity-curvature interaction in these spherically symmetric spacetimes.
    Invoked to derive the out-of-plane deflection from the given metrics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5703 in / 1301 out tokens · 49027 ms · 2026-05-21T06:36:39.560238+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages · 18 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, V. Adya, et al., Astrophys. J. Lett848, L12 (2017)

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Akiyama, A

    K. Akiyama, A. Alberdi, W. Alef, K. Asada, R. Azulay, A. Baczko, D. Ball, M. Balokovi´ c, J. Barrett, E. H. T. Collaboration, et al., The Astrophysical Journal Letters875(2019)

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way

    K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L12 (2022), 2311.08680

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    Sachs, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    R. Sachs, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 264, 309 (1961)

    work page 1961

  5. [5]

    Robinson, Journal of Mathematical Physics2, 290 (1961)

    I. Robinson, Journal of Mathematical Physics2, 290 (1961)

    work page 1961

  6. [6]

    Kristian and R

    J. Kristian and R. K. Sachs, Astrophysical Journal, vol. 143, p. 379143, 379 (1966)

    work page 1966

  7. [7]

    C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler,Gravitation(W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973), ISBN 978-0-7167-0344-0, 978-0-691-17779-3

    work page 1973

  8. [8]

    M. A. Oancea, J. Joudioux, I. Y. Dodin, D. E. Ruiz, C. F. Paganini, and L. Andersson, Phys. Rev. D 102, 024075 (2020), 2003.04553

    work page arXiv 2020

  9. [9]

    P. K. Dahal, Phys. Sci. Forum7, 40 (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Andersson and M

    L. Andersson and M. A. Oancea, Class. Quant. Grav.40, 154002 (2023), 2302.13634

    work page arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    V. P. Frolov and A. A. Shoom, Phys. Rev. D84, 044026 (2011), 1105.5629

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  12. [12]

    Notes on Spinoptics in a Stationary Spacetime

    C.-M. Yoo, Phys. Rev. D86, 084005 (2012), 1207.6833

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  13. [13]

    V. P. Frolov, Phys. Rev. D102, 084013 (2020), 2007.03743

    work page arXiv 2020

  14. [14]

    P. K. Dahal, Appl. Phys. B129, 11 (2023), 2208.04725

    work page arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    V. P. Frolov and A. A. Shoom, Phys. Rev. D86, 024010 (2012), 1205.4479

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  16. [16]

    P. K. Dahal, Eur. Phys. J. Plus138, 205 (2023), 2301.08250

    work page arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    S. Murk, D. R. Terno, and R. Vadapalli, Phys. Rev. D111, 044001 (2025), 2408.02729

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Cusin and M

    G. Cusin and M. Lagos, Phys. Rev. D101, 044041 (2020), 1910.13326

    work page arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    P. K. Dahal, Astronomy1, 271 (2022), 2107.02761

    work page arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Kubota, S

    K.-i. Kubota, S. Arai, and S. Mukohyama, Phys. Rev. D109, 044027 (2024), 2309.11024

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, V. B. Adya, et al., Physical review letters119, 161101 (2017)

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    M. Isi, K. Chatziioannou, and W. M. Farr, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 121101 (2019), 1904.08011

    work page arXiv 2019

  23. [23]

    J. M. Ezquiaga and M. Zumalac´ arregui, Phys. Rev. D102, 124048 (2020), 2009.12187

    work page arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    C. M. Will, Living Rev. Rel.9, 3 (2006), gr-qc/0510072

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  25. [25]

    A Metric for Rapidly Spinning Black Holes Suitable for Strong-Field Tests of the No-Hair Theorem

    T. Johannsen and D. Psaltis, Phys. Rev. D83, 124015 (2011), 1105.3191

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  26. [26]

    New parametrization for spherically symmetric black holes in metric theories of gravity

    L. Rezzolla and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D90, 084009 (2014), 1407.3086

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  27. [27]

    Test-particle dynamics in general spherically symmetric black hole spacetimes

    M. De Laurentis, Z. Younsi, O. Porth, Y. Mizuno, and L. Rezzolla, Phys. Rev. D97, 104024 (2018), 31 1712.00265

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  28. [28]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D101, 124004 (2020), 2001.06100

    work page arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    Decoupling gravitational sources in general relativity: from perfect to anisotropic fluids

    J. Ovalle, Phys. Rev. D95, 104019 (2017), 1704.05899

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  30. [30]

    Regular hairy black holes through Minkowski deformation,

    J. Ovalle, R. Casadio, and A. Giusti, Phys. Lett. B844, 138085 (2023), 2304.03263

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    Ovalle, R

    J. Ovalle, R. Casadio, E. Contreras, and A. Sotomayor, Phys. Dark Univ.31, 100744 (2021), 2006.06735

    work page arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    Ovalle, Phys

    J. Ovalle, Phys. Rev. D107, 104005 (2023), 2305.00030

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Y. Hua, Z. Ban, T.-Y. Ren, J.-J. Yin, and R.-J. Yang, Eur. Phys. J. C86, 44 (2026), 2510.20524

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    Estrada, Eur

    M. Estrada, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 918 (2019), [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 80, 590 (2020)], 1905.12129

    work page arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    A causal Schwarzschild-de Sitter interior solution by gravitational decoupling

    L. Gabbanelli, J. Ovalle, A. Sotomayor, Z. Stuchlik, and R. Casadio, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 486 (2019), 1905.10162

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    Le´ on and C

    P. Le´ on and C. Las Heras, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 260 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Ramos, C

    A. Ramos, C. Arias, E. Fuenmayor, and E. Contreras, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 203 (2021), 2103.05039

    work page arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    Sharif and T

    M. Sharif and T. Naseer, Phys. Dark Univ.42, 101324 (2023), 2310.00872

    work page arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    Rinc´ on, L

    ´A. Rinc´ on, L. Gabbanelli, E. Contreras, and F. Tello-Ortiz, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 873 (2019), 1909.00500

    work page arXiv 2019

  40. [40]

    Compact Anisotropic Models in General Relativity by Gravitational Decoupling

    E. Morales and F. Tello-Ortiz, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 841 (2018), 1808.01699

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  41. [41]

    Gravitational decoupled anisotropies in compact stars

    L. Gabbanelli, ´A. Rinc´ on, and C. Rubio, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 370 (2018), 1802.08000

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    P´ erez Graterol, Eur

    R. P´ erez Graterol, Eur. Phys. J. Plus133, 244 (2018), [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.Plus 134, 369 (2019)]

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    C. L. Heras and P. Leon, Fortsch. Phys.66, 1800036 (2018), 1804.06874

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  44. [44]

    V. A. Torres-S´ anchez and E. Contreras, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 829 (2019), 1908.08194

    work page arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    A general interior anisotropic solution for a BTZ vacuum in the context of the Minimal Geometric Deformation decoupling approach

    E. Contreras, ´A. Rinc´ on, and P. Bargue˜ no, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 216 (2019), 1902.02033

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  46. [46]

    Tello-Ortiz, S

    F. Tello-Ortiz, S. K. Maurya, and P. Bargue˜ no, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 426 (2021), [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 82, 742 (2022)]

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    Andrade, K

    J. Andrade, K. Y. Ortega, W. N. R. Kl´ ınger, R. C. G. Copa, S. S. C. Medina, and J. D. Cruz, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 1085 (2023)

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    Bamba, M

    K. Bamba, M. Z. Bhatti, Z. Yousaf, and Z. Shoukat, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 1033 (2023), 2307.10399

    work page arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    S. K. Maurya, G. Mustafa, S. Ray, B. Dayanandan, A. Aziz, and A. Errehymy, Phys. Dark Univ.42, 101284 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    Iqbal, M

    N. Iqbal, M. Amir, M. Alshammari, W. W. Mohammed, and M. Ilyas, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 428 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    Tello-Ortiz, P

    F. Tello-Ortiz, P. Bargue˜ no, A. Alvarez, and E. Contreras, Fortsch. Phys.71, 2200170 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Contreras and E

    E. Contreras and E. Fuenmayor, Phys. Rev. D103, 124065 (2021), 2107.01140

    work page arXiv 2021

  53. [53]

    R. C. de Paiva, K. S. Alves, R. T. Cavalcanti, and R. da Rocha (2025), 2512.14920

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    V. F. Guimar˜ aes, R. T. Cavalcanti, and R. da Rocha, Class. Quant. Grav.42, 175011 (2025), 2506.20044

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    R. T. Cavalcanti, K. d. S. Alves, and J. M. Hoff da Silva, Universe8, 363 (2022), 2207.03995

    work page arXiv 2022

  56. [56]

    R. T. Cavalcanti, R. C. de Paiva, and R. da Rocha, Eur. Phys. J. Plus137, 1185 (2022), 2203.08740

    work page arXiv 2022

  57. [57]

    Ditta, F

    A. Ditta, F. Javed, S. K. Maurya, G. Mustafa, and F. Atamurotov, Phys. Dark Univ.42, 101345 (2023). 32

    work page 2023

  58. [58]

    Wang, X.-C

    C.-H. Wang, X.-C. Meng, Y.-P. Zhang, T. Zhu, and S.-W. Wei, JCAP07, 021 (2025), 2502.08994

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    V. P. Frolov, Phys. Rev. D110, 064020 (2024), 2405.01777

    work page arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    V. P. Frolov, JCAP12, 051 (2024), 2410.19413

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    R. C. Henry, Astrophys. J.535, 350 (2000), astro-ph/9912320

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  62. [62]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D105, 104032 (2022), 2201.12897

    work page arXiv 2022

  63. [63]

    V. P. Frolov and A. Koek, Phys. Rev. D111, 104081 (2025), 2503.19208

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    Toshmatov and B

    B. Toshmatov and B. Ahmedov, Phys. Rev. D108, 084035 (2023), 2311.04602

    work page arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    Toshmatov, Phys

    B. Toshmatov, Phys. Dark Univ.35, 100992 (2022)

    work page 2022

  66. [66]

    Toshmatov, O

    B. Toshmatov, O. Rahimov, B. Ahmedov, and A. Ahmedov, Galaxies9, 65 (2021)

    work page 2021

  67. [67]

    Dubinsky, Phys

    A. Dubinsky, Phys. Lett. B861, 139251 (2025), 2409.16569

    work page arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    The Sage Developers,SageMath, the Sage Mathematics Software System (Version 10.7)(2025), https://www.sagemath.org

    work page 2025

  69. [69]

    Tensor calculus with open-source software: the SageManifolds project

    E. Gourgoulhon, M. Bejger, and M. Mancini, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.600, 012002 (2015), 1412.4765

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  70. [70]

    Virtanen, R

    P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peterson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright, et al., Nature Methods17, 261 (2020)

    work page 2020

  71. [71]

    V. P. Frolov, P. Krtous, and D. Kubiznak, Living Rev. Rel.20, 6 (2017), 1705.05482

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017