pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21702 · v1 · pith:652H52FBnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.quant-gas· cond-mat.stat-mech· cond-mat.str-el· hep-ex

Journey in quantum metrology and sensing from foundations to applications: a review

Priya Ghosh , Tanoy Kanti Konar , Debraj Rakshit , Aditi Sen De , Ujjwal Sen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 09:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elhep-ex
keywords quantum metrologyquantum sensingparameter estimationquantum Fisher informationquantum error correctionatomic clocksquantum imagingindefinite causal order
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum metrology improves parameter estimation by using quantum resources across unitary, noisy, and indefinite-causal-order channels.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews the foundations of quantum metrology and sensing and traces their path to current applications. It examines both frequentist and Bayesian methods for estimating single or multiple parameters. Coverage includes how information is encoded in unitary operations, noisy channels, quantum thermometry, and processes with indefinite causal order. Advanced techniques such as quantum error correction and reservoir engineering are discussed alongside the role of quantum Fisher information in identifying useful resources. The review then connects these ideas to practical uses in many-body systems, atomic ensembles, atom-photon setups, continuous-variable systems, quantum imaging, illumination, atomic clocks, atom interferometry, and various experimental platforms.

Core claim

The review synthesizes how quantum systems can achieve better precision in estimating unknown parameters than classical methods allow, by exploiting quantum Fisher information to detect and harness resources in encoding processes that range from ideal unitary evolution to noisy channels and indefinite causal order, while incorporating error-correction strategies and leading to applications from quantum many-body sensors to atomic clocks and imaging.

What carries the argument

Quantum Fisher information as a detector of metrological resources that quantifies precision gains for single- and multi-parameter estimation under different encoding channels.

If this is right

  • Researchers gain a single reference that links frequentist and Bayesian estimation strategies to concrete protocols for noisy and indefinite-causal-order channels.
  • Quantum error correction and reservoir engineering appear as practical tools that extend metrological advantage beyond the standard quantum limit in realistic devices.
  • Applications in atomic clocks, quantum imaging, and many-body sensors become easier to design once the role of quantum Fisher information is clarified across platforms.
  • Experimental groups can compare their results directly against the reviewed bounds for continuous-variable and atom-photon sensing schemes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The review implies that combining indefinite causal order with reservoir engineering could open sensing protocols that surpass limits derived from standard channel models.
  • Future atomic-ensemble experiments might test whether the reviewed multiparameter bounds hold when quantum error correction is applied in real time.
  • Connecting the reviewed foundations to emerging hybrid quantum-classical sensors would be a direct next step that the paper leaves open.
  • The synthesis suggests that quantum Fisher information could serve as a diagnostic tool for resource identification even in non-standard many-body Hamiltonians not yet fully explored.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen topics and cited literature together give an accurate, unbiased picture of the current state of quantum metrology and sensing.

What would settle it

A systematic literature search that finds several major recent advances in quantum metrology or sensing missing from the review would show the coverage is incomplete.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21702 by Aditi Sen De, Debraj Rakshit, Priya Ghosh, Tanoy Kanti Konar, Ujjwal Sen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. A cartoon illustration of the general idea behind a sensing protocol. Imagine Alice entering her first day of school with a completely [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Nonlinear-enhanced frequency estimation [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Schematic of thermometry protocols discussed in Ref. [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) A model-independent schematic representation of a quantum thermal machine operating as a thermometer. The temperature of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. A schematic illustration of the key distinction between def [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Schematic representation of various metrological strate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Illustration of a private distributed quantum sensing net [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Measurement noise susceptibility in quantum estimation [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Time dependence of the QFI at the critical point of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Quantum imaging from a quantum metrology perspec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Quantum illumination: QFI-based enhancement of detec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p051_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. (a) A simplified optical layout of the squeezed-light enhanced gravitational wave detector GEO 600, which consists of the conventional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p054_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. A schematic illustration of a frequency-estimation proto [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p056_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Multiparameter sensing using a single NV centre [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p057_16.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a review on quantum metrology and sensing, from its foundations to current applications. Highlights of the review include consideration of both frequentist and Bayesian approaches to parameter estimation; single as well as multiparameter estimation; estimation for different encoding processes comprising unitary as well as noisy channels, quantum thermometry, and channels involving indefinite causal order; different estimation strategies incorporating also recent advances like quantum error correction-aided methods and reservoir engineering; usefulness of quantum Fisher information to detect resources; applications of quantum metrology in diverse arenas covering quantum many-body sensors, sensing protocols in atomic ensembles, atom-photon systems, and continuous-variable systems, quantum imaging, quantum illumination, atomic clocks and atom interferometry, etc; and experimental realizations of quantum sensors in different physical platforms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review article surveying quantum metrology and sensing. It covers foundations including frequentist and Bayesian parameter estimation, single- and multiparameter cases, encoding via unitary and noisy channels, quantum thermometry, and processes with indefinite causal order. It addresses estimation strategies such as quantum error correction-aided methods and reservoir engineering, the utility of quantum Fisher information for resource detection, and applications spanning quantum many-body sensors, atomic ensembles, atom-photon and continuous-variable systems, quantum imaging, illumination, atomic clocks, atom interferometry, plus experimental realizations across physical platforms.

Significance. If the review faithfully summarizes the cited literature with balanced coverage and no major omissions, it would serve as a useful reference bridging theoretical foundations to applications in quantum sensing. The breadth outlined in the abstract aligns with active research areas, and explicit inclusion of both frequentist/Bayesian approaches and noisy-channel cases strengthens its potential utility for the community.

major comments (1)
  1. The abstract asserts comprehensive coverage of 'recent advances like quantum error correction-aided methods and reservoir engineering,' but without a dedicated subsection or explicit citation list in the foundations section, it is unclear whether key 2020–2023 results on QEC-enhanced metrology (e.g., those using surface codes for phase estimation) are represented or only mentioned in passing.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract ends with 'etc;' which should be replaced by a more precise closing phrase or removed for formal tone.
  2. Notation for quantum Fisher information is introduced without an early equation reference; adding a brief definition or pointer to the standard formula (e.g., in the foundations section) would aid readability for non-specialists.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive overall assessment and for recommending minor revision. We appreciate the constructive comment regarding the clarity of coverage for recent advances in the foundations section and address it below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The abstract asserts comprehensive coverage of 'recent advances like quantum error correction-aided methods and reservoir engineering,' but without a dedicated subsection or explicit citation list in the foundations section, it is unclear whether key 2020–2023 results on QEC-enhanced metrology (e.g., those using surface codes for phase estimation) are represented or only mentioned in passing.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The manuscript discusses quantum error correction-aided methods and reservoir engineering within the estimation strategies portion of the foundations section, including citations to relevant literature through 2022. To improve clarity and ensure explicit representation of key 2020–2023 results (such as surface-code-based approaches to phase estimation), we will add a dedicated subsection and an expanded citation list in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: review article with no internal derivations

full rationale

This manuscript is explicitly a review surveying quantum metrology and sensing literature. It enumerates topics (frequentist/Bayesian estimation, unitary/noisy channels, QFI resource detection, many-body sensors, atomic clocks, etc.) but advances no novel equations, parameter fits, predictions, or theorems. No load-bearing steps exist that reduce by construction to self-citations or fitted inputs, as the paper contains no such technical derivations. Coverage claims rest on external citations rather than internal self-reference chains. This is the standard honest outcome for a non-derivational survey.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review, the content rests on the accuracy of literature selection and summary rather than new axioms, parameters, or entities. No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5683 in / 1001 out tokens · 31842 ms · 2026-05-22T09:00:02.765767+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

298 extracted references · 298 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    ¸ S. K. Özdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori, and L. Yang, Parity–time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics, Nature Mate- rials18, 783 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Zhang, T

    H. Zhang, T. Chen, L. Li, C. H. Lee, and X. Zhang, Elec- trical circuit realization of topological switching for the non-hermitian skin effect, Physical Review B107, 085426 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    W. Chen, M. Abbasi, Y . N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, Quan- tum jumps in the non-hermitian dynamics of a superconduct- ing qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 140504 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    C. M. Bender, Making sense of non-hermitian hamiltonians, Reports on Progress in Physics70, 947 (2007)

    work page 2007

  5. [6]

    Lau and A

    H.-K. Lau and A. A. Clerk, Fundamental limits and non- reciprocal approaches in non-hermitian quantum sensing, Nature Communications9, 4320 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [7]

    McDonald and A

    A. McDonald and A. A. Clerk, Exponentially-enhanced quantum sensing with non-Hermitian lattice dynamics, Nat. Commun.11, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [8]

    Y . Chu, Y . Liu, H. Liu, and J. Cai, Quantum sensing with a single-qubit pseudo-hermitian system, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 020501 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [9]

    J. Wiersig, Enhancing the sensitivity of frequency and en- ergy splitting detection by using exceptional points: Appli- cation to microcavity sensors for single-particle detection, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 203901 (2014)

    work page 2014

  9. [10]

    Djorwe, Y

    P. Djorwe, Y . Pennec, and B. Djafari-Rouhani, Exceptional point enhances sensitivity of optomechanical mass sensors, Phys. Rev. Appl.12, 024002 (2019)

    work page 2019

  10. [11]

    Hodaei, A

    H. Hodaei, A. U. Hassan, S. Wittek, H. Garcia-Gracia, R. El- Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, En- hanced sensitivity at higher-order exceptional points, Nature 548, 187 (2017)

    work page 2017

  11. [12]

    Am-Shallem, R

    M. Am-Shallem, R. Kosloff, and N. Moiseyev, Exceptional points for parameter estimation in open quantum systems: analysis of the bloch equations, New Journal of Physics17, 113036 (2015)

    work page 2015

  12. [13]

    Naghiloo, M

    M. Naghiloo, M. Abbasi, Y . N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, Quantum state tomography across the exceptional point in a single dissipative qubit, Nature Physics15, 1232 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [14]

    W. Ding, X. Wang, and S. Chen, Fundamental sensitivity lim- its for non-hermitian quantum sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 160801 (2023)

    work page 2023

  14. [15]

    Wiersig and S

    J. Wiersig and S. Rotter, Fundamental limits of non- hermitian sensing from quantum fisher information, arXiv:2603.10614 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  15. [16]

    J. C. Budich and E. J. Bergholtz, Non-hermitian topological sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 180403 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [17]

    L. Bao, B. Qi, and D. Dong, Exponentially enhanced quan- tum non-hermitian sensing via optimized coherent drive, Phys. Rev. Appl.17, 014034 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [18]

    Sarkar, F

    S. Sarkar, F. Ciccarello, A. Carollo, and A. Bayat, Critical non-Hermitian topology induced quantum sensing, New J. Phys.26, 073010 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [19]

    K. D. Agarwal, T. K. Konar, L. G. C. Lakkaraju, and A. S. De, Quantum-enhanced sensing from the inter- play of long-range interactions and non-hermiticity (2026), arXiv:2605.01912 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  19. [20]

    Koch and J

    F. Koch and J. C. Budich, Quantum non-hermitian topologi- cal sensors, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 013113 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [21]

    Z. Guo, Z. Guo, T. Zhang, J. Song, H. Jiang, H. Chen, and H. Chen, Sensitivity of topological edge states in a non- Hermitian dimer chain, Photonics Res.9, 574 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [22]

    J. Kim, T. Ha, D. Kim, D. Lee, K.-S. Lee, J. Won, Y . Moon, and M. Lee, Third-order exceptional point in an ion–cavity system, Appl. Phys. Lett.123, 161104 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [23]

    L. Xiao, Y . Chu, Q. Lin, H. Lin, W. Yi, J. Cai, and P. Xue, Non-hermitian sensing in the absence of exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 180801 (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [24]

    X. Yu, X. Zhao, L. Li, X.-M. Hu, X. Duan, H. Yuan, and C. Zhang, Toward Heisenberg scaling in non-Hermitian metrology at the quantum regime, Sci. Adv.10, 10.1126/sci- adv.adk7616 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1126/sci- 2024

  24. [25]

    Parto, C

    M. Parto, C. Leefmans, J. Williams, R. M. Gray, and A. Marandi, Enhanced sensitivity via non-Hermitian topol- ogy, Light Sci. Appl.14, 1 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [26]

    Wu, Y .-H

    Q.-C. Wu, Y .-H. Zhou, T. Liu, Y .-H. Kang, Q.-P. Su, C.-P. Yang, and Z.-W. Zhou, Enhanced quantum sensing in time- modulated non-hermitian systems (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [27]

    P.-R. Han, F. Wu, X.-J. Huang, H.-Z. Wu, C.-L. Zou, W. Yi, M. Zhang, H. Li, K. Xu, D. Zheng, H. Fan, J. Wen, Z.- B. Yang, and S.-B. Zheng, Enhancement of Sensitivity Near Exceptional Points in Dissipative Qubit-Resonator Systems, 81 Adv. Quantum Technol.n/a, 2400446 (2025)

    work page 2025

  27. [28]

    Clavero-Rubio, T

    M. Clavero-Rubio, T. Ramos, and D. Porras, Vibrational parametric arrays with trapped ions: non-hermitian topolog- ical phases and quantum sensing, arXiv:2502.06960 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [29]

    Y . L. Liuet al., Metrology with pt-symmetric cavities: En- hanced sensitivity near the pt-phase transition, Physical Re- view Letters117, 110802 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [30]

    Hodaeiet al., Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order excep- tional points, Nature548, 187 (2017)

    H. Hodaeiet al., Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order excep- tional points, Nature548, 187 (2017)

    work page 2017

  30. [31]

    W. Chen, S. K. Ozdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, and L. Yang, Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity, Nature548, 192 (2017)

    work page 2017

  31. [32]

    Naghilooet al., Quantum state tomography across the ex- ceptional point in a single dissipative qubit, Nature Physics 15, 1232 (2019)

    M. Naghilooet al., Quantum state tomography across the ex- ceptional point in a single dissipative qubit, Nature Physics 15, 1232 (2019)

    work page 2019

  32. [33]

    Wiersig, Review of exceptional point-based sensors, Pho- tonics Research8, 1457 (2020)

    J. Wiersig, Review of exceptional point-based sensors, Pho- tonics Research8, 1457 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [34]

    K. Yang, Y . Chu, N. Wang, and J. Cai, Practical advan- tage of non-hermitian enhanced quantum sensing (2026), arXiv:2603.20612 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  34. [35]

    Guoet al., Observation of non-hermitian topology and skin effect in ultracold atoms, Nature Physics17, 192 (2021)

    S. Guoet al., Observation of non-hermitian topology and skin effect in ultracold atoms, Nature Physics17, 192 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [36]

    H. Wang, K. Jacobs, D. Fahey, Y . Hu, D. R. Englund, and M. E. Trusheim, Exceptional sensitivity near the bistable transition point of a hybrid quantum system, Nature Physics 10.1038/s41567-026-03217-3 (2026)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-026-03217-3 2026

  36. [37]

    S. S. Mirkhalaf, E. Witkowska, and L. Lepori, Supersensitive quantum sensor based on criticality in an antiferromagnetic spinor condensate, Phys. Rev. A101, 043609 (2020)

    work page 2020

  37. [38]

    K. D. Agarwal, S. Mondal, A. Sahoo, D. Rakshit, A. Sen(De), and U. Sen, Quantum sensing with ultracold simulators in lattice and ensemble systems: A review, Inter- national Journal of Modern Physics C0, 2543006 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [39]

    Sahoo and D

    A. Sahoo and D. Rakshit, Enhanced sensing of a weak stark field under the influence of aubry-andré-harper criticality, Phys. Rev. A113, 022601 (2026)

    work page 2026

  39. [40]

    Zwierz, C

    M. Zwierz, C. A. Pérez-Delgado, and P. Kok, General opti- mality of the heisenberg limit for quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 180402 (2010)

    work page 2010

  40. [41]

    Zwierz, C

    M. Zwierz, C. A. Pérez-Delgado, and P. Kok, Ultimate lim- its to quantum metrology and the meaning of the heisenberg limit, Phys. Rev. A85, 042112 (2012)

    work page 2012

  41. [42]

    Pang and T

    S. Pang and T. A. Brun, Quantum metrology for a general hamiltonian parameter, Phys. Rev. A90, 022117 (2014)

    work page 2014

  42. [43]

    Giovannetti and L

    V . Giovannetti and L. Maccone, Sub-heisenberg estima- tion strategies are ineffective, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 210404 (2012)

    work page 2012

  43. [44]

    D. Yang, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Efficient informa- tion retrieval for sensing via continuous measurement, Phys. Rev. X13, 031012 (2023)

    work page 2023

  44. [45]

    Gietka, F

    K. Gietka, F. Metz, T. Keller, and J. Li, Adiabatic critical quantum metrology cannot reach the Heisenberg limit even when shortcuts to adiabaticity are applied, Quantum5, 489 (2021)

    work page 2021

  45. [46]

    S.-B. Tang, H. Qin, B.-B. Liu, D.-Y . Wang, K. Cui, S.-L. Su, L.-L. Yan, and G. Chen, Enhancement of quantum sensing in a cavity-optomechanical system around the quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. A108, 053514 (2023)

    work page 2023

  46. [47]

    Zhu, C.-S

    G.-L. Zhu, C.-S. Hu, H. Wang, W. Qin, X.-Y . Lü, and F. Nori, Nonreciprocal superradiant phase transitions and multicriti- cality in a cavity qed system, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 193602 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [48]

    Yuan, H.-F

    J.-B. Yuan, H.-F. Liu, Y .-J. Song, S.-Q. Tang, X.-W. Wang, and L.-M. Kuang, Utilizing evolution time as a resource to enhance quantum sensing by probe qubit dephasing, Phys. Rev. A111, 062620 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [49]

    Garbe, O

    L. Garbe, O. Abah, S. Felicetti, and R. Puebla, Exponential time-scaling of estimation precision by reaching a quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 043061 (2022)

    work page 2022

  49. [50]

    J. Ma, Y . Shen, J. Huang, and C. Lee, Quantum metrology via floquet-engineered two-axis twisting and turning dynamics, Phys. Rev. A112, L040602 (2025)

    work page 2025

  50. [51]

    Wilczek, Quantum time crystals, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Quantum time crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 160401 (2012)

    work page 2012

  51. [52]

    Li, Z.-X

    T. Li, Z.-X. Gong, Z.-Q. Yin, H. T. Quan, X. Yin, P. Zhang, L.-M. Duan, and X. Zhang, Space-time crystals of trapped ions, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 163001 (2012)

    work page 2012

  52. [53]

    D. V . Else, B. Bauer, and C. Nayak, Floquet time crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 090402 (2016)

    work page 2016

  53. [54]

    Yousefjani, K

    R. Yousefjani, K. Sacha, and A. Bayat, Discrete time crys- tal phase as a resource for quantum-enhanced sensing, Phys. Rev. B111, 125159 (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [55]

    Power-law-graded Ising Interactions Stabilize Time Crystals Realizing Quantum Energy Storage and Sensing

    A. Sahoo and D. Rakshit, Power-law interactions stabilize time crystals realizing quantum energy storage and sensing (2025), arXiv:2508.14847 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  55. [56]

    Iemini, R

    F. Iemini, R. Fazio, and A. Sanpera, Floquet time crystals as quantum sensors of ac fields, Phys. Rev. A109, L050203 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [57]

    Montenegro, M

    V . Montenegro, M. G. Genoni, A. Bayat, and M. G. A. Paris, Quantum metrology with boundary time crystals, Communi- cations Physics6, 304 (2023)

    work page 2023

  57. [58]

    Cabot, F

    A. Cabot, F. Carollo, and I. Lesanovsky, Continuous sens- ing and parameter estimation with the boundary time crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 050801 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [59]

    Gribben, A

    D. Gribben, A. Sanpera, R. Fazio, J. Marino, and F. Iemini, Boundary time crystals as AC sensors: Enhancements and constraints, SciPost Phys.18, 100 (2025)

    work page 2025

  59. [60]

    Xueet al., Dissipative time crystal sensors in driven ryd- berg systems, Phys

    Y . Xueet al., Dissipative time crystal sensors in driven ryd- berg systems, Phys. Rev. Research (2026)

    work page 2026

  60. [61]

    Ullah, H

    A. Ullah, H. Mermer, M. Özkurt, I. Lesanovsky, and Ö. E. Müstecaplıo˘glu, Harnessing floquet dynamics for selective metrology in few-qubit systems, arXiv:2510.26942 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [62]

    Iemini, A

    F. Iemini, A. Russomanno, J. Keeling, M. Schirò, M. Dal- monte, and R. Fazio, Boundary time crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 035301 (2018)

    work page 2018

  62. [63]

    Luis, Quantum limits, nonseparable transformations, and nonlinear optics, Phys

    A. Luis, Quantum limits, nonseparable transformations, and nonlinear optics, Phys. Rev. A76, 035801 (2007)

    work page 2007

  63. [64]

    Napolitano and M

    M. Napolitano and M. W. Mitchell, Nonlinear metrology with a quantum interface, New Journal of Physics12, 093016 (2010)

    work page 2010

  64. [65]

    Gross, T

    C. Gross, T. Zibold, E. Nicklas, J. Estève, and M. K. Oberthaler, Nonlinear atom interferometer surpasses classi- cal precision limit, Nature464, 1165 (2010)

    work page 2010

  65. [66]

    M. J. W. Hall and H. M. Wiseman, Does nonlinear metrology offer improved resolution? answers from quantum informa- tion theory, Phys. Rev. X2, 041006 (2012)

    work page 2012

  66. [67]

    J. Joo, K. Park, H. Jeong, W. J. Munro, K. Nemoto, and T. P. Spiller, Quantum metrology for nonlinear phase shifts with entangled coherent states, Phys. Rev. A86, 043828 (2012)

    work page 2012

  67. [68]

    R. J. Sewell, M. Napolitano, N. Behbood, G. Colangelo, F. Martin Ciurana, and M. W. Mitchell, Ultrasensitive atomic spin measurements with a nonlinear interferometer, Phys. Rev. X4, 021045 (2014)

    work page 2014

  68. [69]

    Lenef, T

    A. Lenef, T. D. Hammond, E. T. Smith, M. S. Chapman, R. A. Rubenstein, and D. E. Pritchard, Rotation sensing with an atom interferometer, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 760 (1997)

    work page 1997

  69. [70]

    Wildermuth, S

    S. Wildermuth, S. Hofferberth, I. Lesanovsky, E. Haller, L. M. Andersson, S. Groth, I. Bar-Joseph, P. Krüger, and 82 J. Schmiedmayer, Microscopic magnetic-field imaging, Na- ture435, 440 (2005)

    work page 2005

  70. [71]

    Canuel, F

    B. Canuel, F. Leduc, D. Holleville, A. Gauguet, J. Fils, A. Virdis, A. Clairon, N. Dimarcq, C. J. Bordé, A. Landra- gin, and P. Bouyer, Six-axis inertial sensor using cold-atom interferometry, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 010402 (2006)

    work page 2006

  71. [72]

    Wildermuth, S

    S. Wildermuth, S. Hofferberth, I. Lesanovsky, S. Groth, P. Krüger, J. Schmiedmayer, and I. Bar-Joseph, Sensing electric and magnetic fields with bose-einstein condensates, Appl. Phys. Lett.88, 264103 (2006)

    work page 2006

  72. [73]

    Aigner, L

    S. Aigner, L. D. Pietra, Y . Japha, O. Entin-Wohlman, T. David, R. Salem, R. Folman, and J. Schmiedmayer, Long- range order in electronic transport through disordered metal films, Science319, 1226 (2008)

    work page 2008

  73. [74]

    Estève, C

    J. Estève, C. Gross, A. Weller, S. Giovanazzi, and M. K. Oberthaler, Squeezing and entanglement in a bose–einstein condensate, Nature455, 1216 (2008)

    work page 2008

  74. [75]

    J. E. Debs, P. A. Altin, T. H. Barter, D. Döring, G. R. Dennis, G. McDonald, R. P. Anderson, J. D. Close, and N. P. Robins, Cold-atom gravimetry with a bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A84, 033610 (2011)

    work page 2011

  75. [76]

    Zhou, Z.-K

    M.-K. Zhou, Z.-K. Hu, X.-C. Duan, B.-L. Sun, L.-L. Chen, Q.-Z. Zhang, and J. Luo, Performance of a cold-atom gravimeter with an active vibration isolator, Phys. Rev. A86, 043630 (2012)

    work page 2012

  76. [77]

    S. K. Steinke, S. Singh, P. Meystre, K. C. Schwab, and M. Vengalattore, Quantum backaction in spinor-condensate magnetometry, Phys. Rev. A88, 063809 (2013)

    work page 2013

  77. [78]

    Y . Eto, H. Ikeda, H. Suzuki, S. Hasegawa, Y . Tomiyama, S. Sekine, M. Sadgrove, and T. Hirano, Spin-echo-based magnetometry with spinor bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A88, 031602 (2013)

    work page 2013

  78. [79]

    H. T. Ng, Quantum-limited measurement of magnetic-field gradient with entangled atoms, Phys. Rev. A87, 043602 (2013)

    work page 2013

  79. [80]

    Müntinga, H

    H. Müntinga, H. Ahlers, M. Krutzik, A. Wenzlawski, S. Arnold, D. Becker, K. Bongs, H. Dittus, H. Duncker, N. Gaaloul, C. Gherasim, E. Giese, C. Grzeschik, T. W. Hän- sch, O. Hellmig, W. Herr, S. Herrmann, E. Kajari, S. Klein- ert, C. Lämmerzahl, W. Lewoczko-Adamczyk, J. Malcolm, N. Meyer, R. Nolte, A. Peters, M. Popp, J. Reichel, A. Roura, J. Rudolph, M. ...

    work page 2013

  80. [81]

    D. N. Aguilera, H. Ahlers, B. Battelier, A. Bawamia, A. Bertoldi, R. Bondarescu, K. Bongs, P. Bouyer, C. Brax- maier, L. Cacciapuoti, C. Chaloner, M. Chwalla, W. Ert- mer, M. Franz, N. Gaaloul, M. Gehler, D. Gerardi, L. Gesa, N. Gürlebeck, J. Hartwig, M. Hauth, O. Hellmig, W. Herr, S. Herrmann, A. Heske, A. Hinton, P. Ireland, P. Jet- zer, U. Johann, M. K...

    work page 2014

Showing first 80 references.