Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 minor 5 cited by

Journey in quantum metrology and sensing from foundations to applications: a review

T0 review · 0 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-30 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Quantum metrology reviews both frequentist and Bayesian estimation across unitary, noisy, and indefinite-causal-order channels for applications from atomic clocks to quantum imaging.

desk verdict This is a wide-ranging review of quantum metrology that organizes existing literature across many subtopics but introduces no new results or derivations. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.21702 v2 pith:652H52FB submitted 2026-05-20 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elhep-ex

Priya Ghosh , Tanoy Kanti Konar , Debraj Rakshit , Aditi Sen De , Ujjwal Sen This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elhep-ex
keywords quantummetrologysensingparameterestimationFisherinformationatomicclocksimagingerrorcorrectionreservoirengineering
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper assembles a broad survey of quantum metrology and sensing that begins with parameter-estimation foundations and extends through practical platforms. It treats single- and multi-parameter problems under both frequentist and Bayesian statistics. The survey examines how parameters are encoded in unitary evolution, noisy channels, thermometry, and indefinite causal order, then reviews correction and engineering techniques that protect or enhance those encodings. It also shows how the quantum Fisher information identifies useful resources and catalogs concrete uses in many-body systems, atomic ensembles, continuous-variable setups, imaging, illumination, clocks, interferometry, and laboratory realizations.

What carries the argument

Quantum Fisher information, used to quantify and detect resources that improve estimation precision beyond classical limits.

What would settle it

Identification of a substantial recent advance in one of the listed areas (for example, a new error-correction protocol for thermometry or an unmentioned experimental platform) that is entirely absent from the review would falsify the claim of comprehensive coverage.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

A review of quantum metrology and sensing that systematically covers frequentist and Bayesian approaches to single- and multiparameter estimation, estimation under unitary and noisy channels, quantum thermometry, channels with indefinite causal order, quantum-error-correction-aided and reservoir-engineering strategies, the role of quantum Fisher information in resource detection, and applications ranging from quantum many-body sensors and atomic ensembles through atom-photon and continuous-variable systems to quantum imaging, quantum illumination, atomic clocks, atom interferometry, and experimental demonstrations on multiple physical platforms.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen topics and cited works together give a balanced and reasonably complete picture of the field at the time of writing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Quantum resources remain advantageous for parameter estimation even when the encoding channel is noisy rather than purely unitary.
  • Quantum error correction and reservoir engineering can be combined with standard metrology protocols to maintain precision in the presence of decoherence.
  • The quantum Fisher information supplies a practical diagnostic for identifying which states and operations function as metrological resources.
  • Applications already reach laboratory demonstrations in atomic clocks, atom interferometers, and quantum imagers across several hardware platforms.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same estimation framework could be used to compare the performance of different physical platforms for a single sensing task.
  • Indefinite causal order might be tested as an additional resource in existing atomic-ensemble or continuous-variable sensors.
  • The review's separation of theoretical strategies from experimental platforms suggests a natural next step: quantitative benchmarks that map each strategy onto achievable precision in a given hardware.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Request a human review

A listed scientist reviews the paper for a fee and the review publishes here regardless of verdict. See the reviewers or get listed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review article surveying quantum metrology and sensing from foundations to applications. It addresses frequentist and Bayesian parameter estimation approaches, single- and multiparameter estimation, encoding via unitary and noisy channels (including quantum thermometry and indefinite causal order), estimation strategies incorporating quantum error correction and reservoir engineering, the role of quantum Fisher information as a resource witness, applications across quantum many-body sensors, atomic ensembles, atom-photon and continuous-variable systems, quantum imaging, quantum illumination, atomic clocks, and atom interferometry, as well as experimental realizations on multiple physical platforms.

Significance. A well-executed review synthesizing these topics would be significant for the quantum information community by providing a consolidated reference that connects disparate methods and highlights recent advances such as QEC-aided sensing and reservoir engineering.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract ends with 'etc.'; the main text should explicitly delineate the full scope of covered applications to avoid any appearance of selective emphasis.
  2. Ensure consistent formatting of section headings and citation style throughout, particularly when transitioning between theoretical foundations and experimental sections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the manuscript and the recommendation to accept. The summary provided accurately captures the scope and structure of the review.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Review paper with no original derivations or predictions

full rationale

This is a review article whose abstract and scope explicitly describe a literature synthesis across frequentist/Bayesian methods, single/multiparameter estimation, unitary/noisy channels, QEC, reservoir engineering, QFI applications, and multiple experimental domains. No equations, derivations, parameter fits, or quantitative predictions are asserted by the authors themselves. All technical content is attributed to external citations. Consequently, no load-bearing step reduces to a self-definition, fitted input, or self-citation chain within the paper. The only relevant risk is coverage balance, which is outside the circularity analysis.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

As a review paper the manuscript introduces no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all content is drawn from the prior literature being summarized.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Journey in quantum metrology and sensing from foundations to applications: a review." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/652H52FB

@misc{pith2026260521702,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Journey in quantum metrology and sensing from foundations to applications: a review},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/652H52FB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.21702}
}
read the original abstract

We present a review on quantum metrology and sensing, from its foundations to current applications. Highlights of the review include consideration of both frequentist and Bayesian approaches to parameter estimation; single as well as multiparameter estimation; estimation for different encoding processes comprising unitary as well as noisy channels, quantum thermometry, and channels involving indefinite causal order; different estimation strategies incorporating also recent advances like quantum error correction-aided methods and reservoir engineering; usefulness of quantum Fisher information to detect resources; applications of quantum metrology in diverse arenas covering quantum many-body sensors, sensing protocols in atomic ensembles, atom-photon systems, and continuous-variable systems, quantum imaging, quantum illumination, atomic clocks and atom interferometry, etc; and experimental realizations of quantum sensors in different physical platforms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21702 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. A cartoon illustration of the general idea behind a sensing protocol. Imagine Alice entering her first day of school with a completely [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Nonlinear-enhanced frequency estimation [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Schematic of thermometry protocols discussed in Ref. [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) A model-independent schematic representation of a quantum thermal machine operating as a thermometer. The temperature of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. A schematic illustration of the key distinction between def [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Schematic representation of various metrological strate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Illustration of a private distributed quantum sensing net [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Measurement noise susceptibility in quantum estimation [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_8.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Time dependence of the QFI at the critical point of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Quantum imaging from a quantum metrology perspec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Quantum illumination: QFI-based enhancement of detec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p051_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. (a) A simplified optical layout of the squeezed-light enhanced gravitational wave detector GEO 600, which consists of the conventional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p054_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. A schematic illustration of a frequency-estimation proto [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p056_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Multiparameter sensing using a single NV centre [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p057_16.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum-enhanced sensing in a driven-dissipative system via chiral waveguide

    quant-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A chiral-waveguide array of driven two-level emitters estimates a weak detuning with Fisher information scaling as N^3 for uniform and N^5 for gradient detuning, with linear-in-N preparation time.

  2. Dynamical Crossover of the Quantum Fisher Information in the Spin-Boson Model

    quant-ph 2026-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In the pure-dephasing spin-boson model, the low-frequency spectral exponent and the dephasing coupling control whether the dynamical quantum Fisher information for the qubit gap diverges, saturates, or vanishes in time.

  3. Metrological quantum-to-classical crossover in the volume of a noisy quasiperiodic lattice

    quant-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Thermal noise and lattice defects impose a noise-dependent system-size limit beyond which the quantum Fisher information loses its quantum-enhanced scaling in the Aubry–André–Harper model.

  4. Surpassing Gaussian optimality in multiparameter estimation with indefinite causal order

    quant-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For joint estimation of displacement and squeezing, the optimal fixed-energy Gaussian probe mixes squeezing with displacement, and odd-parity indefinite causal order can outperform it in specific regimes.

  5. Modular non-Hermitian topology and its application to critical sensing

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Modular non-Hermitian systems enrich skin effect and bulk-boundary breakdown while enhancing sensing performance near spectral topological phase transitions, including multi-parameter cases.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

298 extracted references · 298 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Y . Chu, Y . Liu, H. Liu, and J. Cai, Quantum sensing with a single-qubit pseudo-hermitian system, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 020501 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    J. Wiersig, Enhancing the sensitivity of frequency and en- ergy splitting detection by using exceptional points: Appli- cation to microcavity sensors for single-particle detection, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 203901 (2014)

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    Djorwe, Y

    P. Djorwe, Y . Pennec, and B. Djafari-Rouhani, Exceptional point enhances sensitivity of optomechanical mass sensors, Phys. Rev. Appl.12, 024002 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Hodaei, A

    H. Hodaei, A. U. Hassan, S. Wittek, H. Garcia-Gracia, R. El- Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, En- hanced sensitivity at higher-order exceptional points, Nature 548, 187 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Am-Shallem, R

    M. Am-Shallem, R. Kosloff, and N. Moiseyev, Exceptional points for parameter estimation in open quantum systems: analysis of the bloch equations, New Journal of Physics17, 113036 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Naghiloo, M

    M. Naghiloo, M. Abbasi, Y . N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, Quantum state tomography across the exceptional point in a single dissipative qubit, Nature Physics15, 1232 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    W. Ding, X. Wang, and S. Chen, Fundamental sensitivity lim- its for non-hermitian quantum sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 160801 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Fundamental Limits of Non-Hermitian Sensing from Quantum Fisher Information

    J. Wiersig and S. Rotter, Fundamental limits of non- hermitian sensing from quantum fisher information (2026), arXiv:2603.10614 [quant-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

Show all 298 references
  1. [9]

    J. C. Budich and E. J. Bergholtz, Non-hermitian topological sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 180403 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    L. Bao, B. Qi, and D. Dong, Exponentially enhanced quan- tum non-hermitian sensing via optimized coherent drive, Phys. Rev. Appl.17, 014034 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    Sarkar, F

    S. Sarkar, F. Ciccarello, A. Carollo, and A. Bayat, Critical non-Hermitian topology induced quantum sensing, New J. Phys.26, 073010 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    K. D. Agarwal, T. K. Konar, L. G. C. Lakkaraju, and A. S. De, Quantum-enhanced sensing from the inter- play of long-range interactions and non-hermiticity (2026), arXiv:2605.01912 [quant-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Koch and J

    F. Koch and J. C. Budich, Quantum non-hermitian topologi- cal sensors, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 013113 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    Z. Guo, Z. Guo, T. Zhang, J. Song, H. Jiang, H. Chen, and H. Chen, Sensitivity of topological edge states in a non- Hermitian dimer chain, Photonics Res.9, 574 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    J. Kim, T. Ha, D. Kim, D. Lee, K.-S. Lee, J. Won, Y . Moon, and M. Lee, Third-order exceptional point in an ion–cavity system, Appl. Phys. Lett.123, 161104 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    L. Xiao, Y . Chu, Q. Lin, H. Lin, W. Yi, J. Cai, and P. Xue, Non-hermitian sensing in the absence of exceptional points, 81 Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 180801 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    X. Yu, X. Zhao, L. Li, X.-M. Hu, X. Duan, H. Yuan, and C. Zhang, Toward Heisenberg scaling in non-Hermitian metrology at the quantum regime, Sci. Adv.10, 10.1126/sci- adv.adk7616 (2024)

    2024 doi

  10. [18]

    Parto, C

    M. Parto, C. Leefmans, J. Williams, R. M. Gray, and A. Marandi, Enhanced sensitivity via non-Hermitian topol- ogy, Light Sci. Appl.14, 1 (2025)

    2025

  11. [19]

    Wu, Y .-H

    Q.-C. Wu, Y .-H. Zhou, T. Liu, Y .-H. Kang, Q.-P. Su, and C.-P. Yang, Enhanced quantum sensing in time-modulated non-hermitian systems, Chinese Journal of Physics98, 1116–1129 (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    P.-R. Han, F. Wu, X.-J. Huang, H.-Z. Wu, C.-L. Zou, W. Yi, M. Zhang, H. Li, K. Xu, D. Zheng, H. Fan, J. Wen, Z.- B. Yang, and S.-B. Zheng, Enhancement of Sensitivity Near Exceptional Points in Dissipative Qubit-Resonator Systems, Adv. Quantum Technol.n/a, 2400446 (2025)

    2025

  13. [21]

    Clavero-Rubio, T

    M. Clavero-Rubio, T. Ramos, and D. Porras, Vibrational parametric arrays with trapped ions: non-hermitian topolog- ical phases and quantum sensing, arXiv:2502.06960 (2025)

    2025

  14. [22]

    Y . L. Liuet al., Metrology with pt-symmetric cavities: En- hanced sensitivity near the pt-phase transition, Physical Re- view Letters117, 110802 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    Hodaeiet al., Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order excep- tional points, Nature548, 187 (2017)

    H. Hodaeiet al., Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order excep- tional points, Nature548, 187 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    W. Chen, S. K. Ozdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, and L. Yang, Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity, Nature548, 192 (2017)

    2017

  17. [25]

    Naghiloo, M

    M. Naghiloo, M. Abbasi, Y . N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, Quantum state tomography across the exceptional point in a single dissipative qubit, Nature Physics15, 1232–1236 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    Wiersig, Review of exceptional point-based sensors, Pho- tonics Research8, 1457 (2020)

    J. Wiersig, Review of exceptional point-based sensors, Pho- tonics Research8, 1457 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    K. Yang, Y . Chu, N. Wang, and J. Cai, Practical advan- tage of non-hermitian enhanced quantum sensing (2026), arXiv:2603.20612 [quant-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Guoet al., Observation of non-hermitian topology and skin effect in ultracold atoms, Nature Physics17, 192 (2021)

    S. Guoet al., Observation of non-hermitian topology and skin effect in ultracold atoms, Nature Physics17, 192 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    H. Wang, K. Jacobs, D. Fahey, Y . Hu, D. R. Englund, and M. E. Trusheim, Exceptional sensitivity near the bistable transition point of a hybrid quantum system, Nature Physics 10.1038/s41567-026-03217-3 (2026)

    2026 doi

  22. [30]

    S. S. Mirkhalaf, E. Witkowska, and L. Lepori, Supersensitive quantum sensor based on criticality in an antiferromagnetic spinor condensate, Phys. Rev. A101, 043609 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    K. D. Agarwal, S. Mondal, A. Sahoo, D. Rakshit, A. Sen(De), and U. Sen, Quantum sensing with ultracold simulators in lattice and ensemble systems: A review, Inter- national Journal of Modern Physics C0, 2543006 (2025)

    2025

  24. [32]

    Sahoo and D

    A. Sahoo and D. Rakshit, Enhanced sensing of a weak stark field under the influence of aubry-andré-harper criticality, Phys. Rev. A113, 022601 (2026)

    2026

  25. [33]

    Zwierz, C

    M. Zwierz, C. A. Pérez-Delgado, and P. Kok, General opti- mality of the heisenberg limit for quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 180402 (2010)

    2010

  26. [34]

    Zwierz, C

    M. Zwierz, C. A. Pérez-Delgado, and P. Kok, Ultimate lim- its to quantum metrology and the meaning of the heisenberg limit, Phys. Rev. A85, 042112 (2012)

    2012

  27. [35]

    Pang and T

    S. Pang and T. A. Brun, Quantum metrology for a general hamiltonian parameter, Phys. Rev. A90, 022117 (2014)

    2014

  28. [36]

    Giovannetti and L

    V . Giovannetti and L. Maccone, Sub-heisenberg estima- tion strategies are ineffective, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 210404 (2012)

    2012

  29. [37]

    D. Yang, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Efficient informa- tion retrieval for sensing via continuous measurement, Phys. Rev. X13, 031012 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Gietka, F

    K. Gietka, F. Metz, T. Keller, and J. Li, Adiabatic critical quantum metrology cannot reach the Heisenberg limit even when shortcuts to adiabaticity are applied, Quantum5, 489 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    S.-B. Tang, H. Qin, B.-B. Liu, D.-Y . Wang, K. Cui, S.-L. Su, L.-L. Yan, and G. Chen, Enhancement of quantum sensing in a cavity-optomechanical system around the quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. A108, 053514 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Zhu, C.-S

    G.-L. Zhu, C.-S. Hu, H. Wang, W. Qin, X.-Y . Lü, and F. Nori, Nonreciprocal superradiant phase transitions and multicriti- cality in a cavity qed system, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 193602 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Yuan, H.-F

    J.-B. Yuan, H.-F. Liu, Y .-J. Song, S.-Q. Tang, X.-W. Wang, and L.-M. Kuang, Utilizing evolution time as a resource to enhance quantum sensing by probe qubit dephasing, Phys. Rev. A111, 062620 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    Garbe, O

    L. Garbe, O. Abah, S. Felicetti, and R. Puebla, Exponential time-scaling of estimation precision by reaching a quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 043061 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    J. Ma, Y . Shen, J. Huang, and C. Lee, Quantum metrology via floquet-engineered two-axis twisting and turning dynamics, Phys. Rev. A112, L040602 (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    Wilczek, Quantum time crystals, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Quantum time crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 160401 (2012)

    2012

  37. [45]

    Li, Z.-X

    T. Li, Z.-X. Gong, Z.-Q. Yin, H. T. Quan, X. Yin, P. Zhang, L.-M. Duan, and X. Zhang, Space-time crystals of trapped ions, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 163001 (2012)

    2012

  38. [46]

    D. V . Else, B. Bauer, and C. Nayak, Floquet time crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 090402 (2016)

    2016

  39. [47]

    Yousefjani, K

    R. Yousefjani, K. Sacha, and A. Bayat, Discrete time crys- tal phase as a resource for quantum-enhanced sensing, Phys. Rev. B111, 125159 (2025)

    2025

  40. [48]

    Sahoo and D

    A. Sahoo and D. Rakshit, Power-law interactions stabilize time crystals realizing quantum energy storage and sensing (2025), arXiv:2508.14847 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Iemini, R

    F. Iemini, R. Fazio, and A. Sanpera, Floquet time crystals as quantum sensors of ac fields, Phys. Rev. A109, L050203 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    Montenegro, M

    V . Montenegro, M. G. Genoni, A. Bayat, and M. G. A. Paris, Quantum metrology with boundary time crystals, Communi- cations Physics6, 304 (2023)

    2023

  43. [52]

    Gribben, A

    D. Gribben, A. Sanpera, R. Fazio, J. Marino, and F. Iemini, Boundary time crystals as AC sensors: Enhancements and constraints, SciPost Phys.18, 100 (2025)

    2025

  44. [53]

    Y . Jiao, W. Jiang, Y . Zhang, J. Bai, Y . He, H. Shen, J. Zhao, and S. Jia, Observation of multiple time crystals in a driven- dissipative system with rydberg gas, Nature Communications 16, 10.1038/s41467-025-64488-7 (2025)

    2025 doi

  45. [54]

    Ullah, H

    A. Ullah, H. Mermer, M. Özkurt, I. Lesanovsky, and Ö. E. Müstecaplıo˘glu, Harnessing floquet dynamics for selective metrology in few-qubit systems, arXiv:2510.26942 (2025)

    2025

  46. [55]

    Iemini, A

    F. Iemini, A. Russomanno, J. Keeling, M. Schirò, M. Dal- monte, and R. Fazio, Boundary time crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 035301 (2018)

    2018

  47. [56]

    Ding, Z.-K

    D.-S. Ding, Z.-K. Liu, B.-S. Shi, G.-C. Guo, K. Mølmer, and C. S. Adams, Enhanced metrology at the critical point of a many-body rydberg atomic system, Nature Physics18, 1447–1452 (2022). 82

    2022

  48. [57]

    Ilias, D

    T. Ilias, D. Yang, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Criticality- enhanced quantum sensing via continuous measurement, PRX Quantum3, 010354 (2022)

    2022

  49. [58]

    Ilias, D

    T. Ilias, D. Yang, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Criticality- enhanced electric field gradient sensor with single trapped ions, npj Quantum Information10, 10.1038/s41534-024- 00833-w (2024)

    2024 doi

  50. [59]

    Cabot, F

    A. Cabot, F. Carollo, and I. Lesanovsky, Continuous sens- ing and parameter estimation with the boundary time crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 050801 (2024)

    2024

  51. [60]

    D. Yang, M. Ketkar, K. Audenaert, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum cramér-rao precision limit of noisy contin- uous sensing, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 070802 (2026)

    2026

  52. [61]

    Luis, Quantum limits, nonseparable transformations, and nonlinear optics, Phys

    A. Luis, Quantum limits, nonseparable transformations, and nonlinear optics, Phys. Rev. A76, 035801 (2007)

    2007

  53. [62]

    Napolitano and M

    M. Napolitano and M. W. Mitchell, Nonlinear metrology with a quantum interface, New Journal of Physics12, 093016 (2010)

    2010

  54. [63]

    Gross, T

    C. Gross, T. Zibold, E. Nicklas, J. Estève, and M. K. Oberthaler, Nonlinear atom interferometer surpasses classi- cal precision limit, Nature464, 1165 (2010)

    2010

  55. [64]

    M. J. W. Hall and H. M. Wiseman, Does nonlinear metrology offer improved resolution? answers from quantum informa- tion theory, Phys. Rev. X2, 041006 (2012)

    2012

  56. [65]

    J. Joo, K. Park, H. Jeong, W. J. Munro, K. Nemoto, and T. P. Spiller, Quantum metrology for nonlinear phase shifts with entangled coherent states, Phys. Rev. A86, 043828 (2012)

    2012

  57. [66]

    R. J. Sewell, M. Napolitano, N. Behbood, G. Colangelo, F. Martin Ciurana, and M. W. Mitchell, Ultrasensitive atomic spin measurements with a nonlinear interferometer, Phys. Rev. X4, 021045 (2014)

    2014

  58. [67]

    Lenef, T

    A. Lenef, T. D. Hammond, E. T. Smith, M. S. Chapman, R. A. Rubenstein, and D. E. Pritchard, Rotation sensing with an atom interferometer, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 760 (1997)

    1997

  59. [68]

    Wildermuth, S

    S. Wildermuth, S. Hofferberth, I. Lesanovsky, E. Haller, L. M. Andersson, S. Groth, I. Bar-Joseph, P. Krüger, and J. Schmiedmayer, Microscopic magnetic-field imaging, Na- ture435, 440 (2005)

    2005

  60. [69]

    Canuel, F

    B. Canuel, F. Leduc, D. Holleville, A. Gauguet, J. Fils, A. Virdis, A. Clairon, N. Dimarcq, C. J. Bordé, A. Landra- gin, and P. Bouyer, Six-axis inertial sensor using cold-atom interferometry, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 010402 (2006)

    2006

  61. [70]

    Wildermuth, S

    S. Wildermuth, S. Hofferberth, I. Lesanovsky, S. Groth, P. Krüger, J. Schmiedmayer, and I. Bar-Joseph, Sensing electric and magnetic fields with bose-einstein condensates, Appl. Phys. Lett.88, 264103 (2006)

    2006

  62. [71]

    Aigner, L

    S. Aigner, L. D. Pietra, Y . Japha, O. Entin-Wohlman, T. David, R. Salem, R. Folman, and J. Schmiedmayer, Long- range order in electronic transport through disordered metal films, Science319, 1226 (2008)

    2008

  63. [72]

    Estève, C

    J. Estève, C. Gross, A. Weller, S. Giovanazzi, and M. K. Oberthaler, Squeezing and entanglement in a bose–einstein condensate, Nature455, 1216–1219 (2008)

    2008

  64. [73]

    J. E. Debs, P. A. Altin, T. H. Barter, D. Döring, G. R. Dennis, G. McDonald, R. P. Anderson, J. D. Close, and N. P. Robins, Cold-atom gravimetry with a bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A84, 033610 (2011)

    2011

  65. [74]

    Zhou, Z.-K

    M.-K. Zhou, Z.-K. Hu, X.-C. Duan, B.-L. Sun, L.-L. Chen, Q.-Z. Zhang, and J. Luo, Performance of a cold-atom gravimeter with an active vibration isolator, Phys. Rev. A86, 043630 (2012)

    2012

  66. [75]

    S. K. Steinke, S. Singh, P. Meystre, K. C. Schwab, and M. Vengalattore, Quantum backaction in spinor-condensate magnetometry, Phys. Rev. A88, 063809 (2013)

    2013

  67. [76]

    Y . Eto, H. Ikeda, H. Suzuki, S. Hasegawa, Y . Tomiyama, S. Sekine, M. Sadgrove, and T. Hirano, Spin-echo-based magnetometry with spinor bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A88, 031602 (2013)

    2013

  68. [77]

    H. T. Ng, Quantum-limited measurement of magnetic-field gradient with entangled atoms, Phys. Rev. A87, 043602 (2013)

    2013

  69. [78]

    Müntinga, H

    H. Müntinga, H. Ahlers, M. Krutzik, A. Wenzlawski, S. Arnold, D. Becker, K. Bongs, H. Dittus, H. Duncker, N. Gaaloul, C. Gherasim, E. Giese, C. Grzeschik, T. W. Hän- sch, O. Hellmig, W. Herr, S. Herrmann, E. Kajari, S. Klein- ert, C. Lämmerzahl, W. Lewoczko-Adamczyk, J. Malcol...

    2013

  70. [79]

    D. N. Aguilera, H. Ahlers, B. Battelier, A. Bawamia, A. Bertoldi, R. Bondarescu, K. Bongs, P. Bouyer, C. Brax- maier, L. Cacciapuoti, C. Chaloner, M. Chwalla, W. Ert- mer, M. Franz, N. Gaaloul, M. Gehler, D. Gerardi, L. Gesa, N. Gürlebeck, J. Hartwig, M. Hauth, O. Hellmig, W. ...

    2014

  71. [80]

    Hudelist, J

    F. Hudelist, J. Kong, C. Liu, J. Jing, Z. Ou, and W. Zhang, Quantum metrology with parametric amplifier-based pho- ton correlation interferometers, Nature Communications5, 10.1038/ncomms4049 (2014)

    2014 doi

  72. [81]

    Carraz, C

    O. Carraz, C. Siemes, L. Massotti, R. Haagmans, and P. Sil- vestrin, A spaceborne gravity gradiometer concept based on cold atom interferometers for measuring earth’s gravity field, Microgravity Science and Technology26, 139 (2014)

    2014

  73. [82]

    M. Bina, I. Amelio, and M. G. A. Paris, Dicke coupling by feasible local measurements at the superradiant quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. E93, 052118 (2016)

    2016

  74. [83]

    Muessel, H

    W. Muessel, H. Strobel, D. Linnemann, D. B. Hume, and M. K. Oberthaler, Scalable spin squeezing for quantum- enhanced magnetometry with bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 103004 (2014)

    2014

  75. [84]

    Z.-P. Liu, J. Zhang, i. m. c. K. Özdemir, B. Peng, H. Jing, X.- Y . Lü, C.-W. Li, L. Yang, F. Nori, and Y .-x. Liu, Metrology withPT-symmetric cavities: Enhanced sensitivity near the PT-phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 110802 (2016)

    2016

  76. [85]

    Jasperse, M

    M. Jasperse, M. J. Kewming, S. N. Fischer, P. Pakkiam, R. P. Anderson, and L. D. Turner, Continuous faraday measure- ment of spin precession without light shifts, Phys. Rev. A96, 063402 (2017)

    2017

  77. [86]

    Cheiney, L

    P. Cheiney, L. Fouché, S. Templier, F. Napolitano, B. Bat- telier, P. Bouyer, and B. Barrett, Navigation-compatible hy- brid quantum accelerometer using a kalman filter, Phys. Rev. Appl.10, 034030 (2018). 83

    2018

  78. [87]

    Apellaniz, I

    I. Apellaniz, I. n. Urizar-Lanz, Z. Zimborás, P. Hyllus, and G. Tóth, Precision bounds for gradient magnetometry with atomic ensembles, Phys. Rev. A97, 053603 (2018)

    2018

  79. [88]

    Barrett, P

    B. Barrett, P. Cheiney, B. Battelier, F. Napolitano, and P. Bouyer, Multidimensional atom optics and interferometry, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 043604 (2019)

    2019

  80. [89]

    Condon, M

    G. Condon, M. Rabault, B. Barrett, L. Chichet, R. Arguel, H. Eneriz-Imaz, D. Naik, A. Bertoldi, B. Battelier, P. Bouyer, and A. Landragin, All-optical bose-einstein condensates in microgravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 240402 (2019)

    2019

  81. [90]

    Trimeche, B

    A. Trimeche, B. Battelier, D. Becker, A. Bertoldi, P. Bouyer, C. Braxmaier, E. Charron, R. Corgier, M. Cornelius, K. Douch, N. Gaaloul, S. Herrmann, J. Müller, E. Rasel, C. Schubert, H. Wu, and F. Pereira dos Santos, Concept study and preliminary design of a cold atom interfer...

    2019

  82. [91]

    F. Yang, S. F. Taylor, S. D. Edkins, J. C. Palmstrom, I. R. Fisher, and B. L. Lev, Nematic transitions in iron pnictide superconductors imaged with a quantum gas, Nature Physics 16, 514 (2020)

    2020

  83. [92]

    Gersemann, M

    M. Gersemann, M. Gebbe, S. Abend, C. Schubert, and E. M. Rasel, Differential interferometry using a bose-einstein con- densate, The European Physical Journal D74, 203 (2020)

    2020

  84. [93]

    S. S. Szigeti, S. P. Nolan, J. D. Close, and S. A. Haine, High- precision quantum-enhanced gravimetry with a bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 100402 (2020)

    2020

  85. [94]

    Ufrecht, A

    C. Ufrecht, A. Roura, and W. P. Schleich, Bose-einstein con- densates in microgravity and fundamental tests of gravity, arXiv:2107.03709 (2021)

    2021

  86. [95]

    S. P. Alvarez, P. Gomez, S. Coop, R. Zamora-Zamora, C. Mazzinghi, and M. W. Mitchell, Single-domain bose condensate magnetometer achieves energy resolution per bandwidth below ℏ, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119, e2115339119 (2022)

    2022

  87. [96]

    Mishra and A

    U. Mishra and A. Bayat, Integrable quantum many-body sen- sors for ac field sensing, Scientific Reports12, 14760 (2022)

    2022

  88. [97]

    Chenet al., Quantum key distribution over 658 km fiber with distributed vibration sensing, Phys

    J. Chenet al., Quantum key distribution over 658 km fiber with distributed vibration sensing, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 180502 (2022)

    2022

  89. [98]

    d’Armagnac de Castanet, C

    Q. d’Armagnac de Castanet, C. Des Cognets, R. Arguel, S. Templier, V . Jarlaud, V . Ménoret, B. Desruelle, P. Bouyer, and B. Battelier, Atom interferometry at arbitrary orienta- tions and rotation rates, Nature Communications15, 6406 (2024)

    2024

  90. [99]

    Z. H. Saleem, M. Perlin, A. Shaji, and S. K. Gray, Achiev- ing the heisenberg limit with dicke states in noisy quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. A109, 052615 (2024)

    2024

  91. [100]

    Ostermann and K

    L. Ostermann and K. Gietka, Temperature-enhanced critical quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. A109, L050601 (2024)

    2024

  92. [101]

    J. Bate, A. Hamann, M. Canteri, A. Winkler, Z. X. Koong, V . Krutyanskiy, W. Dür, and B. P. Lanyon, Experimen- tal distributed quantum sensing in a noisy environment, arXiv:2501.08940 (2025)

    2025

  93. [102]

    LeDesma, K

    C. LeDesma, K. Mehling, and M. Holland, Vector atom accelerometry in an optical lattice, Science Advances11, eadt7480 (2025)

    2025

  94. [103]

    Stolzenberg, C

    K. Stolzenberg, C. Struckmann, S. Bode, R. Li, A. Herbst, V . V ollenkemper, D. Thomas, A. Rajagopalan, E. M. Rasel, N. Gaaloul, and D. Schlippert, Multi-axis inertial sensing with 2d matter-wave arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 143601 (2025)

    2025

  95. [104]

    Cassens, B

    C. Cassens, B. Meyer-Hoppe, E. Rasel, and C. Klempt, Entanglement-enhanced atomic gravimeter, Phys. Rev. X15, 011029 (2025)

    2025

  96. [105]

    Zhanget al., Distributed multi-parameter quantum metrol- ogy with a superconducting quantum network, Nature Com- munications17, 1825 (2026)

    J. Zhanget al., Distributed multi-parameter quantum metrol- ogy with a superconducting quantum network, Nature Com- munications17, 1825 (2026)

    2026

  97. [106]

    Wanget al., Quantum enhanced metrology based on flip- ping trajectory of cold rydberg gases, Nature Communica- tions17, 1160 (2026)

    Y . Wanget al., Quantum enhanced metrology based on flip- ping trajectory of cold rydberg gases, Nature Communica- tions17, 1160 (2026)

    2026

  98. [107]

    Stas, Y .-C

    P.-J. Stas, Y .-C. Wei, M. Sirotin, Y . Q. Huan, U. Yazlar, F. Abdo Arias, E. Knyazev, G. Baranes, B. Machielse, S. Grandi, D. Riedel, J. Borregaard, H. Park, M. Lon ˇcar, A. Suleymanzade, and M. D. Lukin, Entanglement-assisted non-local optical interferometry in a quantum net...

    2026

  99. [108]

    L. A. Lugiato, A. Gatti, and E. Brambilla, Quantum imaging, Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics4, S176 (2002)

    2002

  100. [109]

    Shih, Quantum imaging (2007), arXiv:0707.0268 [quant- ph]

    Y . Shih, Quantum imaging (2007), arXiv:0707.0268 [quant- ph]

    2007 arXiv

  101. [110]

    Genovese, Real applications of quantum imaging, Journal of Optics18, 073002 (2016)

    M. Genovese, Real applications of quantum imaging, Journal of Optics18, 073002 (2016)

    2016

  102. [111]

    investigations in optics, with special ref- erence to the spectroscope, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science8, 261 (1879)

    Rayleigh, Xxxi. investigations in optics, with special ref- erence to the spectroscope, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science8, 261 (1879)

  103. [112]

    Born and E

    M. Born and E. Wolf,Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light, 7th ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999)

    1999

  104. [113]

    Tsang, R

    M. Tsang, R. Nair, and X.-M. Lu, Quantum theory of su- perresolution for two incoherent optical point sources, Phys. Rev. X6, 031033 (2016)

    2016

  105. [114]

    M. I. Kolobov and C. Fabre, Quantum limits on optical reso- lution, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 3789 (2000)

    2000

  106. [115]

    Tsang, Quantum nonlocality in weak-thermal-light inter- ferometry, Phys

    M. Tsang, Quantum nonlocality in weak-thermal-light inter- ferometry, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 270402 (2011)

    2011

  107. [116]

    Gottesman, T

    D. Gottesman, T. Jennewein, and S. Croke, Longer-baseline telescopes using quantum repeaters, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 070503 (2012)

    2012

  108. [117]

    Lupo and S

    C. Lupo and S. Pirandola, Ultimate precision bound of quantum and subwavelength imaging, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 190802 (2016)

    2016

  109. [118]

    ˇRehaˇcek, Z

    J. ˇRehaˇcek, Z. Hradil, B. Stoklasa, M. Paúr, J. Grover, A. Krzic, and L. L. Sánchez-Soto, Multiparameter quantum metrology of incoherent point sources: Towards realistic su- perresolution, Phys. Rev. A96, 062107 (2017)

    2017

  110. [119]

    S. Z. Ang, R. Nair, and M. Tsang, Quantum limit for two-dimensional resolution of two incoherent optical point sources, Phys. Rev. A95, 063847 (2017)

    2017

  111. [120]

    Tsang, Quantum limits to optical point-source localiza- tion, Optica2, 646 (2015)

    M. Tsang, Quantum limits to optical point-source localiza- tion, Optica2, 646 (2015)

    2015

  112. [121]

    Tsang, Subdiffraction incoherent optical imaging via spatial-mode demultiplexing, New Journal of Physics19, 023054 (2017)

    M. Tsang, Subdiffraction incoherent optical imaging via spatial-mode demultiplexing, New Journal of Physics19, 023054 (2017)

    2017

  113. [122]

    Larson and B

    W. Larson and B. E. A. Saleh, Resurgence of rayleigh’s curse in the presence of partial coherence, Optica5, 1382 (2018)

    2018

  114. [123]

    Napoli, S

    C. Napoli, S. Piano, R. Leach, G. Adesso, and T. Tufarelli, Towards superresolution surface metrology: Quantum esti- mation of angular and axial separations, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 140505 (2019)

    2019

  115. [124]

    Bisketzi, D

    E. Bisketzi, D. Branford, and A. Datta, Quantum limits of localisation microscopy, New Journal of Physics21, 123032 (2019)

    2019

  116. [125]

    Tsang, Quantum limit to subdiffraction incoherent optical imaging, Phys

    M. Tsang, Quantum limit to subdiffraction incoherent optical imaging, Phys. Rev. A99, 012305 (2019). 84

    2019

  117. [126]

    Zhou and L

    S. Zhou and L. Jiang, Modern description of rayleigh’s crite- rion, Phys. Rev. A99, 013808 (2019)

    2019

  118. [127]

    E. T. Khabiboulline, J. Borregaard, K. De Greve, and M. D. Lukin, Optical interferometry with quantum networks, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 070504 (2019)

    2019

  119. [128]

    Datta, M

    C. Datta, M. Jarzyna, Y . L. Len, K. Łukanowski, J. Kołody´nski, and K. Banaszek, Sub-rayleigh resolution of two incoherent sources by array homodyning, Phys. Rev. A 102, 063526 (2020)

    2020

  120. [129]

    C. Lupo, Z. Huang, and P. Kok, Quantum limits to incoher- ent imaging are achieved by linear interferometry, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 080503 (2020)

    2020

  121. [130]

    Sorelli, M

    G. Sorelli, M. Gessner, M. Walschaers, and N. Treps, Moment-based superresolution: Formalism and applications, Phys. Rev. A104, 033515 (2021)

    2021

  122. [131]

    Kurdziałek and R

    S. Kurdziałek and R. Demkowicz-Dobrza ´nski, Super- resolution optical fluctuation imaging—fundamental estima- tion theory perspective, Journal of Optics23, 075701 (2021)

    2021

  123. [132]

    J. O. de Almeida, J. Kołody ´nski, C. Hirche, M. Lewen- stein, and M. Skotiniotis, Discrimination and estimation of incoherent sources under misalignment, Phys. Rev. A103, 022406 (2021)

    2021

  124. [133]

    Liang, S

    K. Liang, S. A. Wadood, and A. N. Vamivakas, Coherence effects on estimating general sub-rayleigh object distribution moments, Phys. Rev. A104, 022220 (2021)

    2021

  125. [134]

    Y . Wang, Y . Zhang, and V . O. Lorenz, Superresolution in in- terferometric imaging of strong thermal sources, Phys. Rev. A104, 022613 (2021)

    2021

  126. [135]

    Bojer, Z

    M. Bojer, Z. Huang, S. Karl, S. Richter, P. Kok, and J. von Zanthier, A quantitative comparison of amplitude versus in- tensity interferometry for astronomy, New Journal of Physics 24, 043026 (2022)

    2022

  127. [136]

    Karuseichyk, G

    I. Karuseichyk, G. Sorelli, M. Walschaers, N. Treps, and M. Gessner, Resolving mutually-coherent point sources of light with arbitrary statistics, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 043010 (2022)

    2022

  128. [137]

    M. Paúr, B. Stoklasa, Z. Hradil, L. L. Sánchez-Soto, and J. Rehacek, Achieving the ultimate optical resolution, Optica 3, 1144 (2016)

    2016

  129. [138]

    M. P. Backlund, Y . Shechtman, and R. L. Walsworth, Funda- mental precision bounds for three-dimensional optical local- ization microscopy with poisson statistics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 023904 (2018)

    2018

  130. [139]

    Boucher, C

    P. Boucher, C. Fabre, G. Labroille, and N. Treps, Spatial opti- cal mode demultiplexing as a practical tool for optimal trans- verse distance estimation, Optica7, 1621 (2020)

    2020

  131. [140]

    A. A. Pushkina, G. Maltese, J. I. Costa-Filho, P. Patel, and A. I. Lvovsky, Superresolution linear optical imaging in the far field, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 253602 (2021)

    2021

  132. [141]

    Sorelli, M

    G. Sorelli, M. Gessner, M. Walschaers, and N. Treps, Opti- mal observables and estimators for practical superresolution imaging, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 123604 (2021)

    2021

  133. [142]

    Mazelanik, A

    M. Mazelanik, A. Leszczy ´nski, and M. Parniak, Optical- domain spectral super-resolution via a quantum-memory- based time-frequency processor, Nature Communications13, 691 (2022)

    2022

  134. [143]

    D. N. Klyshko, Two-photon light: Influence of filtration and a new possible epr experiment, Physics Letters A128, 133 (1988)

    1988

  135. [144]

    D. N. Klyshko, A simple method of preparing pure states of an optical field, of implementing the ein- stein–podolsky–rosen experiment, and of demonstrating the complementarity principle, Soviet Physics Uspekhi31, 74 (1988)

    1988

  136. [145]

    Klyshko, Combine epr and two-slit experiments: Interfer- ence of advanced waves, Physics Letters A132, 299 (1988)

    D. Klyshko, Combine epr and two-slit experiments: Interfer- ence of advanced waves, Physics Letters A132, 299 (1988)

    1988

  137. [146]

    T. B. Pittman, Y . H. Shih, D. V . Strekalov, and A. V . Sergienko, Optical imaging by means of two-photon quan- tum entanglement, Phys. Rev. A52, R3429 (1995)

    1995

  138. [147]

    Heidmann, R

    A. Heidmann, R. J. Horowicz, S. Reynaud, E. Giacobino, C. Fabre, and G. Camy, Observation of quantum noise reduc- tion on twin laser beams, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 2555 (1987)

    1987

  139. [148]

    Jedrkiewicz, Y .-K

    O. Jedrkiewicz, Y .-K. Jiang, E. Brambilla, A. Gatti, M. Bache, L. A. Lugiato, and P. Di Trapani, Detection of sub- shot-noise spatial correlation in high-gain parametric down conversion, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 243601 (2004)

    2004

  140. [149]

    Treps, U

    N. Treps, U. Andersen, B. Buchler, P. K. Lam, A. Maître, H.- A. Bachor, and C. Fabre, Surpassing the standard quantum limit for optical imaging using nonclassical multimode light, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 203601 (2002)

    2002

  141. [150]

    Treps, N

    N. Treps, N. Grosse, W. P. Bowen, C. Fabre, H.-A. Bachor, and P. K. Lam, A quantum laser pointer, Science301, 940 (2003)

    2003

  142. [151]

    Blanchet, F

    J.-L. Blanchet, F. Devaux, L. Furfaro, and E. Lantz, Measure- ment of sub-shot-noise correlations of spatial fluctuations in the photon-counting regime, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 233604 (2008)

    2008

  143. [152]

    Boyer, A

    V . Boyer, A. M. Marino, R. C. Pooser, and P. D. Lett, En- tangled images from four-wave mixing, Science321, 544 (2008)

    2008

  144. [153]

    Brida, L

    G. Brida, L. Caspani, A. Gatti, M. Genovese, A. Meda, and I. R. Berchera, Measurement of sub-shot-noise spatial corre- lations without background subtraction, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 213602 (2009)

    2009

  145. [154]

    M. A. Taylor, J. Janousek, V . Daria, J. Knittel, B. Hage, H.-A. Bachor, and W. P. Bowen, Biological measurement beyond the quantum limit, Nature Photonics7, 229 (2013)

    2013

  146. [155]

    M. A. Taylor, J. Janousek, V . Daria, J. Knittel, B. Hage, H.- A. Bachor, and W. P. Bowen, Subdiffraction-limited quantum imaging within a living cell, Phys. Rev. X4, 011017 (2014)

    2014

  147. [156]

    Dowran, A

    M. Dowran, A. Kumar, B. J. Lawrie, R. C. Pooser, and A. M. Marino, Quantum-enhanced plasmonic sensing, Op- tica5, 628 (2018)

    2018

  148. [157]

    Lloyd, Enhanced sensitivity of photodetection via quan- tum illumination, Science321, 1463 (2008)

    S. Lloyd, Enhanced sensitivity of photodetection via quan- tum illumination, Science321, 1463 (2008)

    2008

  149. [158]

    J. H. Shapiro, The quantum illumination story, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine35, 8 (2020)

    2020

  150. [159]

    Karsa, A

    A. Karsa, A. Fletcher, G. Spedalieri, and S. Pirandola, Quan- tum illumination and quantum radar: a brief overview, Re- ports on Progress in Physics87, 094001 (2024)

    2024

  151. [160]

    M. Sanz, U. Las Heras, J. J. García-Ripoll, E. Solano, and R. Di Candia, Quantum estimation methods for quantum il- lumination, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 070803 (2017)

    2017

  152. [161]

    K. M. R. Audenaert, J. Calsamiglia, R. Muñoz Tapia, E. Bagan, L. Masanes, A. Acin, and F. Verstraete, Discrimi- nating states: The quantum chernoff bound, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 160501 (2007)

    2007

  153. [162]

    Zhong, D.-Q

    W. Zhong, D.-Q. Wang, W.-Y . Zhu, L. Zhou, M.-M. Du, and Y .-B. Sheng, Relation between quantum illumination and quantum parameter estimation, Phys. Rev. A111, 052440 (2025)

    2025

  154. [163]

    Casariego, Y

    M. Casariego, Y . Omar, and M. Sanz, Bi-frequency illumi- nation: A quantum-enhanced protocol, Advanced Quantum Technologies5, 2100051 (2022)

    2022

  155. [164]

    Gupta, S

    R. Gupta, S. Roy, T. Das, and A. Sen(De), Quantum illu- mination with noisy probes: Conditional advantages of non- gaussianity, Physics Letters A505, 129446 (2024). 85

    2024

  156. [165]

    R. Wei, F. Albarelli, J. Li, and V . Giovannetti, Quantum illumination advantage in quantum doppler radar (2024), arXiv:2411.14414 [quant-ph]

    2024

  157. [166]

    X. Zhao, Z. Zhang, and Q. Zhuang, Quantum illumination networks, Communications Physics8, 54 (2025)

    2025

  158. [167]

    Pirandola, J

    S. Pirandola, J. Eisert, C. Weedbrook, A. Furusawa, and S. L. Braunstein, Advances in quantum teleportation, Nature Pho- tonics9, 641 (2015)

    2015

  159. [168]

    X. Xiao, Y . Yao, W.-J. Zhong, Y .-L. Li, and Y .-M. Xie, En- hancing teleportation of quantum fisher information by par- tial measurements, Phys. Rev. A93, 012307 (2016)

    2016

  160. [169]

    Metwally, Estimation of teleported and gained parame- ters in a non-inertial frame, Laser Physics Letters14, 045202 (2017)

    N. Metwally, Estimation of teleported and gained parame- ters in a non-inertial frame, Laser Physics Letters14, 045202 (2017)

    2017

  161. [170]

    El Anouz, A

    K. El Anouz, A. El Allati, and N. Metwally, Teleporta- tion two-qubit state by using two different protocols, Opti- cal and Quantum Electronics51, 10.1007/s11082-019-1904- y (2019)

    1904 doi

  162. [171]

    Guo, H.-P

    Y .-N. Guo, H.-P. Peng, C. Yang, Q. Xie, and K. Zeng, Davies theory for teleportation of quantum fisher information under decoherence, Laser Physics Letters16, 125202 (2019)

    2019

  163. [172]

    Jafarzadeh, H

    M. Jafarzadeh, H. Rangani Jahromi, and M. Amniat-Talab, Effects of partial measurements on quantum resources and quantum fisher information of a teleported state in a rela- tivistic scenario, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Math- ematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences...

    2020

  164. [173]

    Seida, A

    C. Seida, A. El Allati, N. Metwally, and Y . Hassouni, Bidirec- tional teleportation using fisher information, Modern Physics Letters A35, 2050272 (2020)

    2020

  165. [174]

    Seida, S

    C. Seida, S. Seddik, Y . Hassouni, and A. E. Allati, Memory effects on bidirectional teleportation, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications606, 128115 (2022)

    2022

  166. [175]

    Li, Y .-B

    Y .-L. Li, Y .-B. Zeng, L. Yao, and X. Xiao, Improving the precision of multiparameter estimation in the teleportation of qutrit under amplitude damping noise, Annalen der Physik 535, 2200535 (2023)

    2023

  167. [176]

    Huang, B

    Z. Huang, B. Q. Baragiola, N. C. Menicucci, and M. M. Wilde, Limited quantum advantage for stellar interferome- try via continuous-variable teleportation, Phys. Rev. A109, 052434 (2024)

    2024

  168. [177]

    Aharonov, L

    Y . Aharonov, L. Davidovich, and N. Zagury, Quantum ran- dom walks, Phys. Rev. A48, 1687 (1993)

    1993

  169. [178]

    Kempe, Quantum random walks: An introductory overview, Contemporary Physics44, 307 (2003)

    J. Kempe, Quantum random walks: An introductory overview, Contemporary Physics44, 307 (2003)

    2003

  170. [179]

    S. E. Venegas-Andraca, Quantum walks: a comprehensive review, Quantum Information Processing11, 1015 (2012)

    2012

  171. [180]

    Portugal,Quantum Walks and Search Algorithms (Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 2013)

    R. Portugal,Quantum Walks and Search Algorithms (Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 2013)

    2013

  172. [181]

    F. Xia, J. Liu, H. Nie, Y . Fu, L. Wan, and X. Kong, Random walks: A review of algorithms and applications, IEEE Trans- actions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence4, 95 (2020)

    2020

  173. [182]

    Farhi and S

    E. Farhi and S. Gutmann, Quantum computation and decision trees, Phys. Rev. A58, 915 (1998)

    1998

  174. [183]

    Mülken and A

    O. Mülken and A. Blumen, Continuous-time quantum walks: Models for coherent transport on complex networks, Physics Reports502, 37 (2011)

    2011

  175. [184]

    Rajauria, P

    P. Rajauria, P. Chawla, and C. M. Chandrashekar, Estimation of one-dimensional discrete-time quantum walk parameters by using machine learning algorithms, arXiv:2007.04572 (2020)

    2007

  176. [185]

    Annabestani, M

    M. Annabestani, M. Hassani, D. Tamascelli, and M. G. A. Paris, Multiparameter quantum metrology with discrete-time quantum walks, Phys. Rev. A105, 062411 (2022)

    2022

  177. [186]

    Cavazzoni, L

    S. Cavazzoni, L. Razzoli, G. Ragazzi, P. Bordone, and M. G. A. Paris, Coin dimensionality as a resource in quan- tum metrology involving discrete-time quantum walks, Phys. Rev. A109, 022432 (2024)

    2024

  178. [187]

    Moradi and M

    M. Moradi and M. Annabestani, Improving quantum walk metrology with split-step quantum walk, Phys. Rev. A113, 022402 (2026)

    2026

  179. [188]

    Shukla and C

    K. Shukla and C. M. Chandrashekar, Quantum magnetom- etry using discrete-time quantum walk, Phys. Rev. A109, 032608 (2024)

    2024

  180. [189]

    Cavazzoni, P

    S. Cavazzoni, P. Bordone, and M. G. A. Paris, Optimizing topology for quantum probing with discrete-time quantum walks, A VS Quantum Science6, 044401 (2024)

    2024

  181. [190]

    Seveso, C

    L. Seveso, C. Benedetti, and M. G. A. Paris, The walker speaks its graph: global and nearly-local probing of the tun- nelling amplitude in continuous-time quantum walks, Jour- nal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical52, 105304 (2019)

    2019

  182. [191]

    Gianani and C

    I. Gianani and C. Benedetti, Multiparameter estimation of continuous-time quantum walk hamiltonians through ma- chine learning, A VS Quantum Science5, 014405 (2023)

    2023

  183. [192]

    Zatelli, C

    F. Zatelli, C. Benedetti, and M. G. A. Paris, Scattering as a quantum metrology problem: A quantum walk approach, Entropy22, 10.3390/e22111321 (2020)

    2020 doi

  184. [193]

    Carney, G

    D. Carney, G. Krnjaic, D. C. Moore, C. A. Regal, G. Afek, S. Bhave, B. Brubaker, T. Corbitt, J. Cripe, N. Crisosto, A. Geraci, S. Ghosh, J. G. E. Harris, A. Hook, E. W. Kolb, J. Kunjummen, R. F. Lang, T. Li, T. Lin, Z. Liu, J. Lykken, L. Magrini, J. Manley, N. Matsumoto, A. Mo...

    2021

  185. [194]

    Zheng, M

    H. Zheng, M. Silveri, R. T. Brierley, S. M. Girvin, and K. W. Lehnert, Accelerating dark-matter axion searches with quan- tum measurement technology (2016), arXiv:1607.02529 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  186. [195]

    Malnou, D

    M. Malnou, D. A. Palken, B. M. Brubaker, L. R. Vale, G. C. Hilton, and K. W. Lehnert, Squeezed vacuum used to accel- erate the search for a weak classical signal, Phys. Rev. X9, 021023 (2019)

    2019

  187. [196]

    A. V . Dixit, S. Chakram, K. He, A. Agrawal, R. K. Naik, D. I. Schuster, and A. Chou, Searching for dark matter with a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 141302 (2021)

    2021

  188. [197]

    K. M. Backes, D. A. Palken, S. A. Kenany, B. M. Brubaker, S. B. Cahn, A. Droster, G. C. Hilton, S. Ghosh, H. Jack- son, S. K. Lamoreaux, A. F. Leder, K. W. Lehnert, S. M. Lewis, M. Malnou, R. H. Maruyama, N. M. Rapidis, M. Simanovskaia, S. Singh, D. H. Speller, I. Urdinaran, L...

    2021

  189. [198]

    A. J. Brady, C. Gao, R. Harnik, Z. Liu, Z. Zhang, and Q. Zhuang, Entangled sensor-networks for dark-matter searches, PRX Quantum3, 030333 (2022)

    2022

  190. [199]

    Shi and Q

    H. Shi and Q. Zhuang, Ultimate precision limit of noise sens- ing and dark matter search, npj Quantum Information9, 27 (2023)

    2023

  191. [200]

    Fukuda, Y

    H. Fukuda, Y . Matsuzaki, and T. Sichanugrist, Directional searching for light dark matter with quantum sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 241802 (2025)

    2025

  192. [201]

    Knill, R

    E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, A scheme for ef- ficient quantum computation with linear optics, Nature409, 86 46 (2001)

    2001

  193. [202]

    J. L. O’Brien, A. Furusawa, and J. Vuˇckovi´c, Photonic quan- tum technologies, Nature Photonics3, 687 (2009)

    2009

  194. [203]

    Lenzini, J

    F. Lenzini, J. Janousek, O. Thearle, M. Villa, B. Haylock, S. Kasture, L. Cui, H.-P. Phan, D. V . Dao, H. Yonezawa, P. K. Lam, E. H. Huntington, and M. Lobino, Integrated photonic platform for quantum information with continuous variables, Science Advances4, eaat9331 (2018)

    2018

  195. [204]

    Slussarenko and G

    S. Slussarenko and G. J. Pryde, Photonic quantum informa- tion processing: A concise review, Applied Physics Reviews 6, 041303 (2019)

    2019

  196. [205]

    J. Wang, F. Sciarrino, A. Laing, and M. G. Thompson, Inte- grated photonic quantum technologies, Nature Photonics14, 273 (2020)

    2020

  197. [206]

    Polino, M

    E. Polino, M. Valeri, N. Spagnolo, and F. Sciarrino, Pho- tonic quantum metrology, A VS Quantum Science2, 024703 (2020)

    2020

  198. [207]

    R. K. Ramakrishnan, A. B. Ravichandran, A. Mishra, A. Kaushalram, G. Hegde, S. Talabattula, and P. P. Rohde, Integrated photonic platforms for quantum technology: a review, ISSS Journal of Micro and Smart Systems12, 83 (2023)

    2023

  199. [208]

    Riedel, T

    D. Riedel, T. Graziosi, Z. Wang, C. De-Eknamkul, A. Abul- naga, J. Dietz, A. Mucchietto, M. Haas, M. Sutula, P. Bar- ral, M. Pompili, M. Raha, C. Robens, J. Ha, D. Sukachev, D. Levonian, M. Bhaskar, M. Markham, and B. Machielse, Scalable photonic quantum interconnect platform,...

    2026

  200. [209]

    The next step for metrology, Nature Photonics5, 185 (2011)

    2011

  201. [210]

    Moreau, E

    P.-A. Moreau, E. Toninelli, T. Gregory, and M. J. Pad- gett, Imaging with quantum states of light, Nature Reviews Physics1, 367 (2019)

    2019

  202. [211]

    Schlawin, K

    F. Schlawin, K. E. Dorfman, and S. Mukamel, Pump-probe spectroscopy using quantum light with two-photon coinci- dence detection, Phys. Rev. A93, 023807 (2016)

    2016

  203. [212]

    K. E. Dorfman, F. Schlawin, and S. Mukamel, Nonlinear op- tical signals and spectroscopy with quantum light, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 045008 (2016)

    2016

  204. [213]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, A gravitational wave obser- vatory operating beyond the quantum shot-noise limit, Na- ture Physics7, 962 (2011)

    2011

  205. [214]

    R. Schnabel, Squeezed states of light and their applica- tions in laser interferometers, Physics Reports684, 1 (2017), squeezed states of light and their applications in laser inter- ferometers

    2017

  206. [215]

    Yonezawa, D

    H. Yonezawa, D. Nakane, T. A. Wheatley, K. Iwasawa, S. Takeda, H. Arao, K. Ohki, K. Tsumura, D. W. Berry, T. C. Ralph, H. M. Wiseman, E. H. Huntington, and A. Fu- rusawa, Quantum-enhanced optical-phase tracking, Science 337, 1514–1517 (2012)

    2012

  207. [216]

    U. L. Andersen, T. Gehring, C. Marquardt, and G. Leuchs, 30 years of squeezed light generation, Physica Scripta91, 053001 (2016)

    2016

  208. [217]

    I. Afek, O. Ambar, and Y . Silberberg, High-noon states by mixing quantum and classical light, Science328, 879 (2010)

    2010

  209. [218]

    Daryanoosh, S

    S. Daryanoosh, S. Slussarenko, D. W. Berry, H. M. Wise- man, and G. J. Pryde, Experimental optical phase measure- ment approaching the exact heisenberg limit, Nature Com- munications9, 4606 (2018)

    2018

  210. [219]

    Brida, M

    G. Brida, M. Genovese, and I. Ruo Berchera, Experimental realization of sub-shot-noise quantum imaging, Nature Pho- tonics4, 227 (2010)

    2010

  211. [220]

    Zhang, Z

    Y . Zhang, Z. He, X. Tong, D. C. Garrett, R. Cao, and L. V . Wang, Quantum imaging of biological organisms through spatial and polarization entanglement, Science Advances10, eadk1495 (2024)

    2024

  212. [221]

    Eshun, O

    A. Eshun, O. Varnavski, J. P. Villabona-Monsalve, R. K. Bur- dick, and T. Goodson III, Entangled photon spectroscopy, Accounts of Chemical Research55, 991 (2022)

    2022

  213. [222]

    Moretti, E

    L. Moretti, E. Rojas-Gatjens, L. Uboldi, D. O. Tiede, E. J. Kumar, C. Trovatello, F. Preda, A. Perri, C. Manzoni, G. Cerullo, and A. R. Srimath Kandada, Measurement prin- ciples for quantum spectroscopy of molecular materials with entangled photons, The Journal of Chemical Phy...

    2023

  214. [223]

    J. J. Fan, Z.-Y . Ou, and Z. Zhang, Entangled photons en- abled ultrafast stimulated raman spectroscopy for molecular dynamics, Light: Science & Applications13, 163 (2024)

    2024

  215. [224]

    Leibfried, R

    D. Leibfried, R. Blatt, C. Monroe, and D. Wineland, Quan- tum dynamics of single trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 281 (2003)

    2003

  216. [225]

    Lewenstein, A

    M. Lewenstein, A. Sanpera, V . Ahufinger, B. Damski, A. Sen(De), and U. Sen, Ultracold atomic gases in optical lattices: mimicking condensed matter physics and beyond, Advances in Physics56, 243 (2007)

    2007

  217. [226]

    L. D. Carr, D. DeMille, R. V . Krems, and J. Ye, Cold and ultracold molecules: science, technology and applications, New Journal of Physics11, 055049 (2009)

    2009

  218. [227]

    A. D. Cronin, J. Schmiedmayer, and D. E. Pritchard, Op- tics and interferometry with atoms and molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 1051 (2009)

    2009

  219. [228]

    Lewenstein, A

    M. Lewenstein, A. Sanpera, and V . Ahufinger,Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices: Simulating quantum many-body systems(OUP Oxford, 2012)

    2012

  220. [229]

    J. L. Bohn, A. M. Rey, and J. Ye, Cold molecules: Progress in quantum engineering of chemistry and quantum matter, Science357, 1002 (2017)

    2017

  221. [231]

    C. D. Bruzewicz, J. Chiaverini, R. McConnell, and J. M. Sage, Trapped-ion quantum computing: Progress and chal- lenges, Applied Physics Reviews6, 021314 (2019)

    2019

  222. [232]

    Jaksch, C

    D. Jaksch, C. Bruder, J. I. Cirac, C. W. Gardiner, and P. Zoller, Cold bosonic atoms in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 3108 (1998)

    1998

  223. [233]

    Greiner, O

    M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. Hänsch, and I. Bloch, Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms, Nature415, 39 (2002)

    2002

  224. [234]

    Hofstetter, J

    W. Hofstetter, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, E. Demler, and M. D. Lukin, High-temperature superfluidity of fermionic atoms in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 220407 (2002)

    2002

  225. [235]

    Jördens, N

    R. Jördens, N. Strohmaier, K. Günter, H. Moritz, and T. Esslinger, A mott insulator of fermionic atoms in an op- tical lattice, Nature455, 204 (2008)

    2008

  226. [236]

    Schneider, L

    U. Schneider, L. Hackermüller, S. Will, T. Best, I. Bloch, T. A. Costi, R. W. Helmes, D. Rasch, and A. Rosch, Metallic and insulating phases of repulsively interacting fermions in a 3d optical lattice, Science322, 1520 (2008)

    2008

  227. [237]

    L.-M. Duan, E. Demler, and M. D. Lukin, Controlling spin exchange interactions of ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 090402 (2003)

    2003

  228. [238]

    Trotzky, P

    S. Trotzky, P. Cheinet, S. Fölling, M. Feld, U. Schnorrberger, A. M. Rey, A. Polkovnikov, E. A. Demler, M. D. Lukin, and I. Bloch, Time-resolved observation and control of superex- change interactions with ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Science319, 295 (2008). 87

    2008

  229. [239]

    Simon, W

    J. Simon, W. S. Bakr, R. Ma, M. E. Tai, P. M. Preiss, and M. Greiner, Quantum simulation of antiferromagnetic spin chains in an optical lattice, Nature472, 307 (2011)

    2011

  230. [240]

    Nozières and S

    P. Nozières and S. Schmitt-Rink, Bose condensation in an attractive fermion gas: From weak to strong coupling super- conductivity, Journal of Low Temperature Physics59, 195 (1985)

    1985

  231. [241]

    C. A. Regal, M. Greiner, and D. S. Jin, Observation of reso- nance condensation of fermionic atom pairs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 040403 (2004)

    2004

  232. [242]

    M. W. Zwierlein, J. R. Abo-Shaeer, A. Schirotzek, C. H. Schunck, and W. Ketterle, V ortices and superfluidity in a strongly interacting fermi gas, Nature435, 1047 (2005)

    2005

  233. [243]

    P. W. Anderson, Absence of diffusion in certain random lat- tices, Phys. Rev.109, 1492 (1958)

    1958

  234. [244]

    Billy, V

    J. Billy, V . Josse, Z. Zuo, A. Bernard, B. Hambrecht, P. Lu- gan, D. Clément, L. Sanchez-Palencia, P. Bouyer, and A. As- pect, Direct observation of anderson localization of matter waves in a controlled disorder, Nature453, 891 (2008)

    2008

  235. [245]

    Roati, C

    G. Roati, C. D’Errico, L. Fallani, M. Fattori, C. Fort, M. Za- ccanti, G. Modugno, M. Modugno, and M. Inguscio, Ander- son localization of a non-interacting bose–einstein conden- sate, Nature453, 895 (2008)

    2008

  236. [246]

    C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Serbyn, and Z. Papi´c, Weak ergodicity breaking from quantum many- body scars, Nature Physics14, 745 (2018)

    2018

  237. [247]

    C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Serbyn, and Z. Papi´c, Quantum scarred eigenstates in a rydberg atom chain: Entanglement, breakdown of thermalization, and sta- bility to perturbations, Phys. Rev. B98, 155134 (2018)

    2018

  238. [248]

    Bluvstein, A

    D. Bluvstein, A. Omran, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semegh- ini, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, A. A. Michailidis, N. Maskara, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, M. Serbyn, M. Greiner, V . Vuleti´c, and M. D. Lukin, Controlling quantum many-body dynamics in driven rydberg atom arrays, Science371, 1355 (2021)

    2021

  239. [249]

    Trotzky, Y .-A

    S. Trotzky, Y .-A. Chen, A. Flesch, I. P. McCulloch, U. Schollwöck, J. Eisert, and I. Bloch, Probing the relax- ation towards equilibrium in an isolated strongly correlated one-dimensional bose gas, Nature Physics8, 325 (2012)

    2012

  240. [250]

    K. Pyka, J. Keller, H. L. Partner, R. Nigmatullin, T. Burger- meister, D. M. Meier, K. Kuhlmann, A. Retzker, M. B. Ple- nio, W. H. Zurek, A. del Campo, and T. E. Mehlstäubler, Topological defect formation and spontaneous symmetry breaking in ion coulomb crystals, Nature Commun...

    2013 doi

  241. [251]

    Y .-J. Lin, R. L. Compton, K. Jiménez-García, J. V . Porto, and I. B. Spielman, Synthetic magnetic fields for ultracold neutral atoms, Nature462, 628 (2009)

    2009

  242. [252]

    Aidelsburger, M

    M. Aidelsburger, M. Atala, M. Lohse, J. T. Barreiro, B. Pare- des, and I. Bloch, Realization of the hofstadter hamiltonian with ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 185301 (2013)

    2013

  243. [253]

    Miyake, G

    H. Miyake, G. A. Siviloglou, C. J. Kennedy, W. C. Burton, and W. Ketterle, Realizing the harper hamiltonian with laser- assisted tunneling in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 185302 (2013)

    2013

  244. [254]

    Y .-J. Lin, K. Jiménez-García, and I. B. Spielman, Spin–orbit- coupled bose–einstein condensates, Nature471, 83 (2011)

    2011

  245. [255]

    Struck, C

    J. Struck, C. Ölschläger, R. L. Targat, P. Soltan-Panahi, A. Eckardt, M. Lewenstein, P. Windpassinger, and K. Seng- stock, Quantum simulation of frustrated classical magnetism in triangular optical lattices, Science333, 996 (2011)

    2011

  246. [256]

    Goldman and J

    N. Goldman and J. Dalibard, Periodically driven quantum systems: Effective hamiltonians and engineered gauge fields, Phys. Rev. X4, 031027 (2014)

    2014

  247. [257]

    Meinert, M

    F. Meinert, M. J. Mark, K. Lauber, A. J. Daley, and H.-C. Nägerl, Floquet engineering of correlated tunneling in the bose-hubbard model with ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 205301 (2016)

    2016

  248. [258]

    C. M. Q. Flores, R. Kaubruegger, M. C. Tran, X. Gao, A. M. Rey, and Z. Gong, Time complexity in preparing metro- logically useful quantum states (2025), arXiv:2511.14855 [quant-ph]

    2025

  249. [259]

    Kim, M.-S

    K. Kim, M.-S. Chang, R. Islam, S. Korenblit, L.-M. Duan, and C. Monroe, Entanglement and tunable spin-spin cou- plings between trapped ions using multiple transverse modes, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 120502 (2009)

    2009

  250. [260]

    Islam, C

    R. Islam, C. Senko, W. C. Campbell, S. Korenblit, J. Smith, A. Lee, E. E. Edwards, C.-C. J. Wang, J. K. Freericks, and C. Monroe, Emergence and frustration of magnetism with variable-range interactions in a quantum simulator, Science 340, 583–587 (2013)

    2013

  251. [261]

    Richerme, Z.-X

    P. Richerme, Z.-X. Gong, A. Lee, C. Senko, J. Smith, M. Foss-Feig, S. Michalakis, A. V . Gorshkov, and C. Mon- roe, Non-local propagation of correlations in quantum sys- tems with long-range interactions, Nature511, 198–201 (2014)

    2014

  252. [262]

    Jurcevic, B

    P. Jurcevic, B. P. Lanyon, P. Hauke, C. Hempel, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Quasiparticle engineering and entan- glement propagation in a quantum many-body system, Na- ture511, 202–205 (2014)

    2014

  253. [263]

    Piltz, T

    C. Piltz, T. Sriarunothai, S. S. Ivanov, S. Wölk, and C. Wun- derlich, Versatile microwave-driven trapped ion spin system for quantum information processing, Science Advances2, 10.1126/sciadv.1600093 (2016)

    2016 doi

  254. [264]

    Monroe, W

    C. Monroe, W. C. Campbell, L.-M. Duan, Z.-X. Gong, A. V . Gorshkov, P. W. Hess, R. Islam, K. Kim, N. M. Linke, G. Pagano, P. Richerme, C. Senko, and N. Y . Yao, Programmable quantum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025001 (2021)

    2021

  255. [265]

    A. Celi, P. Massignan, J. Ruseckas, N. Goldman, I. B. Spiel- man, G. Juzeli ¯unas, and M. Lewenstein, Synthetic gauge fields in synthetic dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 043001 (2014)

    2014

  256. [266]

    Argüello-Luengo, U

    J. Argüello-Luengo, U. Bhattacharya, A. Celi, R. W. Chha- jlany, T. Grass, M. Płodzie ´n, D. Rakshit, T. Salamon, P. Stornati, L. Tarruell, and M. Lewenstein, Synthetic dimen- sions for topological and quantum phases, Communications Physics7, 143 (2024)

    2024

  257. [267]

    Mancini, G

    M. Mancini, G. Pagano, G. Cappellini, L. Livi, M. Rider, J. Catani, C. Sias, P. Zoller, M. Inguscio, M. Dalmonte, and L. Fallani, Observation of chiral edge states with neutral fermions in synthetic hall ribbons, Science349, 1510 (2015)

    2015

  258. [268]

    B. K. Stuhl, H.-I. Lu, L. M. Aycock, D. Genkina, and I. B. Spielman, Visualizing edge states with an atomic bose gas in the quantum hall regime, Science349, 1514 (2015)

    2015

  259. [269]

    Salamon, A

    T. Salamon, A. Celi, R. W. Chhajlany, I. Frérot, M. Lewen- stein, L. Tarruell, and D. Rakshit, Simulating twistronics without a twist, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 030504 (2020)

    2020

  260. [270]

    Salamon, R

    T. Salamon, R. W. Chhajlany, A. Dauphin, M. Lewenstein, and D. Rakshit, Quantum anomalous hall phase in synthetic bilayers via twistronics without a twist, Phys. Rev. B102, 235126 (2020)

    2020

  261. [271]

    Salamon, B

    T. Salamon, B. Irsigler, D. Rakshit, M. Lewenstein, T. Grass, and R. Chhajlany, Flat-band-induced superconductivity in synthetic bilayer optical lattices, Phys. Rev. B106, 174503 (2022). 88

    2022

  262. [272]

    Ospelkaus, K.-K

    S. Ospelkaus, K.-K. Ni, D. Wang, M. H. G. de Miranda, B. Neyenhuis, G. Quéméner, P. S. Julienne, J. L. Bohn, D. S. Jin, and J. Ye, Quantum-state controlled chemical re- actions of ultracold potassium-rubidium molecules, Science 327, 853 (2010)

    2010

  263. [273]

    M. H. G. de Miranda, A. Chotia, B. Neyenhuis, D. Wang, G. Quéméner, S. Ospelkaus, J. L. Bohn, J. Ye, and D. S. Jin, Controlling the quantum stereodynamics of ultracold bi- molecular reactions, Nature Physics7, 502 (2011)

    2011

  264. [274]

    Häffner, C

    H. Häffner, C. Roos, and R. Blatt, Quantum computing with trapped ions, Physics Reports469, 155 (2008)

    2008

  265. [275]

    J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Quantum computations with cold trapped ions, Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 4091 (1995)

    1995

  266. [276]

    Monroe, D

    C. Monroe, D. M. Meekhof, B. E. King, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland, Demonstration of a fundamental quantum logic gate, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 4714 (1995)

    1995

  267. [277]

    Jaksch, J

    D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, S. L. Rolston, R. Côté, and M. D. Lukin, Fast quantum gates for neutral atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 2208 (2000)

    2000

  268. [278]

    Saffman, T

    M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, Quantum in- formation with rydberg atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 2313 (2010)

    2010

  269. [279]

    C. W. Chou, D. B. Hume, J. C. J. Koelemeij, D. J. Wineland, and T. Rosenband, Frequency comparison of two high- accuracyal + optical clocks, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 070802 (2010)

    2010

  270. [280]

    B. J. Bloom, T. L. Nicholson, J. R. Williams, S. L. Campbell, M. Bishof, X. Zhang, W. Zhang, S. L. Bromley, and J. Ye, An optical lattice clock with accuracy and stability at the10 −18 level, Nature506, 71 (2014)

    2014

  271. [281]

    Bongs, M

    K. Bongs, M. Holynski, J. V ovrosh, P. Bouyer, G. Condon, E. Rasel, C. Schubert, W. P. Schleich, and A. Roura, Taking atom interferometric quantum sensors from the laboratory to real-world applications, Nat. Rev. Phys.1, 731 (2019)

    2019

  272. [282]

    Salvi, L

    L. Salvi, L. Cacciapuoti, G. M. Tino, and G. Rosi, Atom in- terferometry with rb blue transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 103401 (2023)

    2023

  273. [283]

    J. M. Brown and T. G. Walker, Perspective: Practical atom- based quantum sensors, Phys. Rev. A112, 040102 (2025)

    2025

  274. [284]

    Vengalattore, J

    M. Vengalattore, J. M. Higbie, S. R. Leslie, J. Guzman, L. E. Sadler, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, High-resolution magne- tometry with a spinor bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 200801 (2007)

    2007

  275. [285]

    Budker and M

    D. Budker and M. Romalis, Optical magnetometry, Nature Physics3, 227–234 (2007)

    2007

  276. [286]

    Kitching, S

    J. Kitching, S. Knappe, and E. A. Donley, Atomic sensors – a review, IEEE Sensors Journal11, 1749–1758 (2011)

    2011

  277. [287]

    K.-K. Ni, S. Ospelkaus, D. Wang, G. Quéméner, B. Neyen- huis, M. H. G. de Miranda, J. L. Bohn, J. Ye, and D. S. Jin, Dipolar collisions of polar molecules in the quantum regime, Nature464, 1324–1328 (2010)

    2010

  278. [288]

    J. A. Sedlacek, A. Schwettmann, H. Kübler, R. Löw, T. Pfau, and J. P. Shaffer, Microwave electrometry with rydberg atoms in a vapour cell using bright atomic resonances, Nature Physics8, 819–824 (2012)

    2012

  279. [289]

    C. L. Holloway, J. A. Gordon, A. Schwarzkopf, D. A. An- derson, S. A. Miller, N. Thaicharoen, and G. Raithel, Sub- wavelength imaging and field mapping via electromagneti- cally induced transparency and autler-townes splitting in ryd- berg atoms, Applied Physics Letters104, 10...

    2014 doi

  280. [290]

    K. A. Gilmore, M. Affolter, R. J. Lewis-Swan, D. Barber- ena, E. Jordan, A. M. Rey, and J. J. Bollinger, Quantum- enhanced sensing of displacements and electric fields with two-dimensional trapped-ion crystals, Science373, 673–678 (2021)

    2021

  281. [291]

    M. J. Biercuk, H. Uys, J. W. Britton, A. P. VanDevender, and J. J. Bollinger, Ultrasensitive detection of force and displace- ment using trapped ions, Nature Nanotechnology5, 646–650 (2010)

    2010

  282. [292]

    Bl ¯ums, M

    V . Bl ¯ums, M. Piotrowski, M. I. Hussain, B. G. Norton, S. C. Connell, S. Gensemer, M. Lobino, and E. W. Streed, A single-atom 3d sub-attonewton force sensor, Science Ad- vances4, 10.1126/sciadv.aao4453 (2018)

    2018 doi

  283. [293]

    M. S. Safronova, D. Budker, D. DeMille, D. F. J. Kimball, A. Derevianko, and C. W. Clark, Search for new physics with atoms and molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 025008 (2018)

    2018

  284. [294]

    and Baron, W

    J. and Baron, W. C. Campbell, D. DeMille, J. M. Doyle, G. Gabrielse, Y . V . Gurevich, P. W. Hess, N. R. Hutzler, E. Kirilov, I. Kozyryev, B. R. O’Leary, C. D. Panda, M. F. Parsons, E. S. Petrik, B. Spaun, A. C. Vutha, and A. D. West, Order of magnitude smaller limit on the el...

    2014

  285. [295]

    Andreev, D

    V . Andreev, D. G. Ang, D. DeMille, J. M. Doyle, G. Gabrielse, J. Haefner, N. R. Hutzler, Z. Lasner, C. Meisen- helder, B. R. O’Leary, C. D. Panda, A. D. West, E. P. West, X. Wu, and A. Collaboration, Improved limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron, Nature562, 355...

    2018

  286. [296]

    Ospelkaus, K.-K

    S. Ospelkaus, K.-K. Ni, D. Wang, M. H. G. de Miranda, B. Neyenhuis, G. Quéméner, P. S. Julienne, J. L. Bohn, D. S. Jin, and J. Ye, Quantum-state controlled chemical re- actions of ultracold potassium-rubidium molecules, Science 327, 853–857 (2010)

    2010

  287. [297]

    M. H. G. de Miranda, A. Chotia, B. Neyenhuis, D. Wang, G. Quéméner, S. Ospelkaus, J. L. Bohn, J. Ye, and D. S. Jin, Controlling the quantum stereodynamics of ultracold bi- molecular reactions, Nature Physics7, 502–507 (2011)

    2011

  288. [298]

    Makhlin, G

    Y . Makhlin, G. Schön, and A. Shnirman, Quantum-state en- gineering with josephson-junction devices, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 357 (2001)

    2001

  289. [299]

    J. Q. You and F. Nori, Superconducting circuits and quantum information, Physics Today58, 42–47 (2005)

    2005

  290. [300]

    M. H. devoret and J. M. Martinis, Implementing qubits with superconducting integrated circuits, Quantum Information Processing3, 163–203 (2004)

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed June 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.