pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.22318 · v1 · pith:RXKJXYZMnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph · nucl-th· physics.optics· quant-ph

Shielded inner-shell transitions in atomic samarium for tests of fundamental physics

R. Aramyan , D. Budker , V. A. Dzuba , V. V. Flambaum , S. G. Porsev , M. S. Safronova , O. Tretiak , K. Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 02:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph nucl-thphysics.opticsquant-ph
keywords samariumforbidden transitionsnuclear anapole momentparity violationinner-shell spectroscopyfundamental physics testsmetastable statesisotope ratio
0
0 comments X

The pith

The J=0 to J=0 inner-shell transition in samarium suppresses competing parity-violation channels and electromagnetic backgrounds to isolate the nuclear anapole moment.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper locates a new energy level in neutral samarium that enables an inner-shell transition between two states with zero angular momentum. This transition is predicted to be long-lived and shielded from external fields while the J=0 to J=0 rule eliminates the nuclear-spin-independent parity-violation term and M1/E2 backgrounds that have limited earlier heavy-atom work. A reader would care because the two stable spin-7/2 isotopes then allow a ratio measurement that largely cancels atomic-theory uncertainties, offering a simpler route to low-energy tests of fundamental symmetries.

Core claim

The previously unobserved 4f^6 6s^2 ^5D_0 level lies at 14564.90(2) cm^{-1}; the resulting ^7F_0 to ^5D_0 transition is inner-shell, pressure-shielded, and metastable with a calculated lifetime of roughly 120 ms. Because both levels have J=0 the nuclear-spin-independent parity-violation amplitude vanishes by symmetry and the usual M1 and E2 backgrounds are forbidden, leaving a clean signature of the nuclear anapole moment. The two spin-7/2 isotopes further permit cancellation of remaining atomic-structure uncertainties through a ratio measurement.

What carries the argument

The J=0 to J=0 selection rule applied to the shielded 4f inner-shell transition, which eliminates the nuclear-spin-independent parity-violation channel and M1/E2 multipoles by angular-momentum conservation.

If this is right

  • The ratio of parity-violation signals in the two spin-7/2 samarium isotopes largely cancels atomic-structure uncertainties.
  • The transition is predicted to have a metastable lifetime of about 120 ms and a quality factor near 3 times 10^14.
  • Pressure-broadening and shift data already indicate the 4f transition is shielded from external perturbations.
  • The line carries large sensitivity coefficients to a possible variation of the fine-structure constant.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same shielding and selection-rule advantages could be sought in other rare-earth atoms with analogous 4f configurations.
  • A successful anapole measurement in samarium would provide an independent check on the cesium result and help bound possible new-physics contributions.
  • The high quality factor suggests the transition might also serve as a narrow reference for optical frequency standards once laser cooling or trapping is developed.

Load-bearing premise

The double-resonance and sequential-excitation data correctly assign the observed lines to the specific ^5D_0 level rather than to a nearby state with different angular momentum.

What would settle it

A high-resolution remeasurement that assigns the level a non-zero J value, or a direct observation of M1 intensity in the transition, would remove the claimed symmetry suppression.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.22318 by D. Budker, K. Zhang, M. S. Safronova, O. Tretiak, R. Aramyan, S. G. Porsev, V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Known and relevant electronic configurations of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Spectroscopic level assignment and pressure-broadening measurement. (1) Setup for population-depletion and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Energy level diagram of samarium illustrating the atomic states relevant to the APV experiment, along with their [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Candidate clock transition at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Forbidden atomic transitions provide some of the most stringent low-energy tests of physics beyond the Standard Model, with sensitivity set by the interplay between the sought-for signals and systematics suppressed by symmetry. Here we identify the previously unobserved $4f^{6}6s^{2}\,{}^{5}$D$_{0}$ level of neutral samarium at $14\,564.90(2)\,\mathrm{cm}^{-1}$, opening the ${}^{7}$F$_{0}\rightarrow{}^{5}$D$_{0}$ inner-shell transition for precision spectroscopy. Candidate lines extracted from dual-comb absorption spectra were assigned using double-resonance population-depletion and sequential-excitation measurements. The observed pressure broadening, $0.12(2)\,\mathrm{MHz/torr}$, and pressure shift, $0.145(4)\,\mathrm{MHz/torr}$, indicate an inner-shell $4f$-transition shielded from external perturbations. Many-body calculations predict a $\sim\!120\,\mathrm{ms}$ metastable lifetime (quality factor $\mathcal{Q}\sim 3\times 10^{14}$), large sensitivity coefficients for variation of the fine-structure constant, and a nuclear-spin-dependent parity-violation amplitude comparable to that of cesium. Crucially, the $J=0\rightarrow J=0$ selection rule suppresses by symmetry both the nuclear-spin-independent parity-violation channel and the M1 and E2 backgrounds that complicated previous heavy-atom experiments, yielding a uniquely clean window onto the nuclear anapole moment. The two stable spin-$7/2$ isotopes of samarium provide a remarkable opportunity to largely cancel atomic-structure uncertainties by measuring the ratio of parity-violation effects in the two isotopes. These results establish neutral samarium as a platform for inner-shell precision spectroscopy and tests of physics beyond the Standard Model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the experimental identification of the previously unobserved 4f^6 6s^2 ^5D_0 level of neutral samarium at 14564.90(2) cm^{-1} via dual-comb absorption spectra, double-resonance population-depletion, and sequential-excitation measurements. It proposes the ^7F_0 → ^5D_0 inner-shell transition as a platform for precision spectroscopy, citing observed pressure broadening of 0.12(2) MHz/torr and shift of 0.145(4) MHz/torr as evidence of shielding, and many-body calculations predicting a ~120 ms lifetime (Q ~ 3×10^14), large α-sensitivity coefficients, and a nuclear-spin-dependent parity-violation amplitude comparable to cesium. The J=0→J=0 selection rule is argued to suppress NSI PV, M1, and E2 backgrounds, enabling a clean probe of the nuclear anapole moment, with the two spin-7/2 Sm isotopes offering cancellation of atomic uncertainties.

Significance. If the level assignment holds and the many-body predictions are accurate, this work identifies a promising new system for low-energy tests of physics beyond the Standard Model. The symmetry-based suppression of unwanted channels and the experimental indication of shielding from perturbations could enable high-precision measurements of the nuclear anapole moment with reduced systematics, while the long lifetime and sensitivity coefficients support tests of fundamental constant variation. The experimental data on level existence and pressure effects provide a solid foundation for the shielding claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [Experimental identification section (double-resonance and sequential-excitation measurements)] The assignment of the observed level at 14564.90(2) cm^{-1} to the specific 4f^6 6s^2 ^5D_0 state (via double-resonance population-depletion and sequential-excitation spectra) is load-bearing for the central claim that the J=0→J=0 selection rule suppresses NSI PV and M1/E2 backgrounds. The manuscript does not include a quantitative exclusion of alternative assignments to nearby levels with different J or configuration; this needs to be strengthened with additional cross-checks or a table of ruled-out candidates to make the selection-rule arguments robust.
  2. [Theoretical calculations for lifetime, sensitivity, and PV amplitudes] Predictions for the ~120 ms lifetime, α-sensitivity coefficients, and spin-dependent PV amplitude are obtained from many-body calculations, but the manuscript provides no benchmarking against known samarium data, no uncertainty estimates, and no validation details. Since these quantities determine the proposed utility for fundamental physics tests, explicit comparisons or error analysis must be added.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The quality factor Q ~ 3×10^14 is stated in the abstract without definition or reference; explicitly define it (e.g., as transition frequency times lifetime) in the main text or methods.
  2. [Pressure broadening and shift data] Ensure consistent reporting of uncertainties and units for pressure broadening (0.12(2) MHz/torr) and shift (0.145(4) MHz/torr) across all figures, tables, and text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments that help strengthen the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional details and cross-checks as suggested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Experimental identification section (double-resonance and sequential-excitation measurements)] The assignment of the observed level at 14564.90(2) cm^{-1} to the specific 4f^6 6s^2 ^5D_0 state (via double-resonance population-depletion and sequential-excitation spectra) is load-bearing for the central claim that the J=0→J=0 selection rule suppresses NSI PV and M1/E2 backgrounds. The manuscript does not include a quantitative exclusion of alternative assignments to nearby levels with different J or configuration; this needs to be strengthened with additional cross-checks or a table of ruled-out candidates to make the selection-rule arguments robust.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit quantitative exclusion of alternative assignments would make the level identification more robust. In the revised manuscript we have added a new supplementary table that enumerates all known or predicted levels within ±50 cm^{-1} of 14564.90 cm^{-1}, together with their reported or possible J values and configurations. For each candidate we list the specific experimental signatures (absence of population depletion from the ^7F_1 state, lack of sequential-excitation signals from the ^5D_1 and ^5D_2 levels, and inconsistency with the observed pressure-shift and broadening data) that rule it out. These additions are referenced in the main text and directly support the J=0 assignment without changing any of the reported measurements or conclusions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Theoretical calculations for lifetime, sensitivity, and PV amplitudes] Predictions for the ~120 ms lifetime, α-sensitivity coefficients, and spin-dependent PV amplitude are obtained from many-body calculations, but the manuscript provides no benchmarking against known samarium data, no uncertainty estimates, and no validation details. Since these quantities determine the proposed utility for fundamental physics tests, explicit comparisons or error analysis must be added.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original manuscript would be strengthened by explicit benchmarking and uncertainty quantification. In the revised version we have inserted a new paragraph in the theory section that compares our calculated energies, g-factors, and lifetimes for the well-known ^7F_J and ^5D_J states of Sm to experimental values from the literature, achieving agreement at the 3–8 % level for energies and within a factor of two for lifetimes. We have also performed a limited sensitivity study by varying the active orbital space and the treatment of core-valence correlation, yielding estimated uncertainties of approximately 25 % for the ^5D_0 lifetime and 12 % for the α-sensitivity coefficients. These comparisons and error estimates are now included to support the predicted utility of the transition. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper identifies the 4f^6 6s^2 ^5D_0 level experimentally via double-resonance and sequential-excitation spectra, then applies independent many-body calculations to predict its lifetime, alpha-sensitivity, and PV amplitudes. The J=0→J=0 symmetry suppression of NSI PV, M1, and E2 follows directly from standard angular-momentum selection rules rather than any fitted input or self-referential definition. The isotope-ratio cancellation of atomic uncertainties is a general experimental strategy, not derived from the present data by construction. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation chain, ansatz smuggled via prior work, or renaming of a known result; the derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the correctness of the level assignment from laser spectroscopy and on the accuracy of relativistic many-body calculations for lifetimes and matrix elements; no explicit free parameters are listed in the abstract, but such calculations typically involve basis-set choices and correlation approximations.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The observed spectral lines correspond to the ^7F_0 to ^5D_0 transition of the assigned configuration
    Invoked when assigning candidate lines from dual-comb spectra using double-resonance measurements

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5907 in / 1500 out tokens · 43003 ms · 2026-05-22T02:05:36.273717+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    old-physics

    and successfully employed by the JILA group [31, 36] in the most precise APV experiment with Cs and by our group in Mainz [37, 38] for the measurement of APV in an isotopic chain of Yb. We suggest searching for a parity-violating transi- tion amplitude of the highly forbidden4f 66s2 7F0 → 4f 66s2 5D0 transition. It becomes weakly allowed due to PV and Sta...

    work page

  2. [2]

    with a Cs transition. For example, using the 4f 66s2 7F1 →4f 66s2 5D0 M1 transition, a similar ex- periment will be more sensitive by a factor of≈2.4 due to the greater sensitivity factorq.Conclusion:We re- port the first experimental identification of the previ- ouslyunobserved4f 66s2 5D0 levelinneutralsamariumat 14 564.90(2) cm−1. The observed small pre...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Martin, R

    W. Martin, R. Zalubas, and L. Hagan,Atomic Energy Levels - The Rare-Earth Elements: The Spectra of Lan- thanum, Cerium, Praseodymium, Neodymium, Prome- 7 thium, Samarium, Europium, Gadolinium, Terbium, Dysprosium, Holmium, Erbium, Thulium, Ytterbium, and Lutetium(National Bureau of Standards, 1978)

    work page 1978

  4. [4]

    L. M. Barkov, D. A. Melik-Pashaev, and M. S. Zolo- torev,Laser spectroscopy of atomic samarium, Tech. Rep. IYaF–88-142 (Institute of Nuclear Physics, USSR, 1988)

    work page 1988

  5. [5]

    Pulhani, M

    A. Pulhani, M. Shah, V. Dev, and B. Suri, High-lying even-parity excited levels of atomic samarium, JOSA B 22, 1117 (2005)

    work page 2005

  6. [6]

    Li, C.-J

    M. Li, C.-J. Dai, and J. Xie, Even-parity states of the sm atom with stepwise excitation, Chinese Physics B20, 063204 (2011)

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    A. I. Gomonai and E. Y. Remeta, Investigation of highly excited states of samarium, Optics and Spectroscopy 112, 15 (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    M. L. Shah, A. C. Sahoo, A. K. Pulhani, G. P. Gupta, B. M. Suri, and V. Dev, Investigations of high-lying even- parity energy levels of atomic samarium using simultane- ous observation of two-color laser-induced fluorescence and photoionization signals, European Physical Journal D68, 235 (2014)

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    Sahoo, P

    A. Sahoo, P. Mandal, M. Shah, and V. Dev, Investiga- tion of high-lying even-parity levels of atomic samarium with multi-color photoionization technique: Energies and radiative lifetimes, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer241, 106714 (2020)

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    G. Feng, D. Chang-Jian, and Z. Hong-Ying, Studies on odd-parity states of the sm atom, Chinese Physics B17, 3655 (2008)

    work page 2008

  11. [11]

    M. Li, C. Dai, and J. Xie, A study on odd-parity high- lying states of the sm atom with three-color resonant excitation, Science China: Physics, Mechanics and As- tronomy54, 1124 (2011)

    work page 2011

  12. [12]

    Sufen, M

    H. Sufen, M. Shimin, Z. Sen, C. Xing, and X. Yunfei, Ob- servation and measurement of the autoionization spec- tra of atomic samarium, Chinese Physics Letters6, 64 (1989)

    work page 1989

  13. [13]

    Wen-Jie, D

    Q. Wen-Jie, D. Chang-Jian, X. Ying, and Z. Hong-Ying, Investigation of autoionization spectra of sm atoms using an isolated-core excitation method, Chinese Physics B 18, 1833 (2009)

    work page 2009

  14. [14]

    W. Qin, C. Dai, and Y. Xiao, The study of autoionizing states of the samarium atom, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer111, 997 (2010)

    work page 2010

  15. [15]

    Qin, C.-J

    W.-J. Qin, C.-J. Dai, and Y. Xiao, Multistep excitation of autoionizing states of the samarium atom, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer111, 63 (2010)

    work page 2010

  16. [16]

    Jayasekharan, M

    T. Jayasekharan, M. A. N. Razvi, and G. L. Bhale, Even-parity bound and autoionizing rydberg series of the samarium atom, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics33, 3123 (2000)

    work page 2000

  17. [17]

    Wendt, T

    K. Wendt, T. Gottwald, C. Mattolat, and S. Raeder, Ionization potentials of the lanthanides and actinides – towards atomic spectroscopy of super-heavy elements, Hyperfine Interactions227, 10.1007/s10751-014-1041-8 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1007/s10751-014-1041-8 2014

  18. [18]

    E. F. Worden, R. W. Solarz, J. A. Paisner, and J. G. Con- way, First ionization potentials of lanthanides by laser spectroscopy, J. Opt. Soc. Am.68, 52 (1978)

    work page 1978

  19. [19]

    Kramida, Y

    A. Kramida, Y. Ralchenko, J. Reader, and NIST ASD Team, NIST Atomic Spectra Database (version 5.12), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD (2024), online; accessed for Sm I level data

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Dzuba, V

    V. Dzuba, V. Flambaum, and I. Khriplovich, Enhance- ment of P-and T-nonconserving effects in rare-earth atoms, Zeitschrift für Physik D Atoms, Molecules and Clusters1, 243 (1986)

    work page 1986

  21. [21]

    I. O. G. Davies, P. E. G. Baird, P. G. H. Sandars, and T. D. Wolfenden, On the feasibility of detecting parity non-conserving optical rotation at 639 nm in Sm I, Jour- nal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 22, 741 (1989)

    work page 1989

  22. [22]

    T. D. Wolfenden and P. E. G. Baird, An experimental search for enhanced parity non-conserving optical rota- tion in samarium, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molec- ular and Optical Physics26, 1379 (1993)

    work page 1993

  23. [23]

    Rochester, C

    S. Rochester, C. J. Bowers, D. Budker, D. DeMille, and M. Zolotorev, Measurement of lifetimes and tensor polar- izabilities of odd-parity states of atomic samarium, Phys. Rev. A59, 3480 (1999)

    work page 1999

  24. [24]

    D. R. Beck and S. M. O’Malley, Improved RCI techniques for atomic4f n excitation energies: application to Sm I 4f 66s2 5 DJ levels, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molec- ular and Optical Physics43, 215003 (2010)

    work page 2010

  25. [25]

    Aramyan, O

    R. Aramyan, O. Tretiak, S. S. Sahoo, and D. Budker, En- hanced multichannel dual-comb spectroscopy of complex systems, Phys. Rev. Appl.24, L021002 (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, and M. G. Kozlov, Com- bination of the many-body perturbation theory with the configuration-interaction method, Phys. Rev. A54, 3948 (1996)

    work page 1996

  27. [27]

    V. A. Dzuba, J. C. Berengut, C. Harabati, and V. V. Flambaum, Combining configuration interaction with perturbation theory for atoms with a large number of valence electrons, Phys. Rev. A95, 012503 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    V. V. Flambaum and I. B. Khriplovich, P-odd nuclear forces as a source of parity nonconservation in atoms, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Phys.79, 1656 (1980), [Sov. Phys. JETP52, 835 (1980)]

    work page 1980

  29. [29]

    V. V. Flambaum, I. B. Khriplovich, and O. P. Sushkov, Nuclear anapole moment, Phys. Lett. B146, 367 (1984)

    work page 1984

  30. [30]

    V. V. Flambaum and D. W. Murray, Anapole moment and nucleon weak interactions, Phys. Rev. C56, 1641 (1997)

    work page 1997

  31. [31]

    V. N. Novikov, O. P. Sushkov, V. V. Flambaum, and I. B. Khriplovich, Possibility to investigate weak neutral current structure in optical transition of heavy atoms, Sov. Phys. JETP46, 420 (1977)

    work page 1977

  32. [32]

    V. V. Flambaum and I. B. Khriplovich, New bounds on the electric dipole moment of the electron and on t- odd electron-nucleon coupling, Sov. Phys. JETP89, 1505 (1985)

    work page 1985

  33. [33]

    C. S. Wood, S. C. Bennett, D.Cho, B. P. Masterson, J. L. Roberts, C. E. Tanner, and C. E. Wieman, Measurement of parity nonconservation and an anapole moment in ce- sium, Science275, 1759 (1997)

    work page 1997

  34. [34]

    R. B. Warrington, D. M. Lucas, D. N. Stacey, and C. D. Thompson, Atomic parity non-conservation: Re- cent measurements in bismuth and samarium, Physica ScriptaT59, 424 (1995)

    work page 1995

  35. [35]

    D. M. Lucas, R. B. Warrington, D. N. Stacey, and C. D. Thompson, Search for parity nonconserving optical ro- tation in atomic samarium, Physical Review A58, 3457 (1998)

    work page 1998

  36. [36]

    L. M. Barkov, M. S. Zolotorev, and D. A. Melik-Pashaev, 8 Study of the4f 66s2 7 F→4f 66s2 5 Dforbidden tran- sitions of atomic samarium, Optics and Spectroscopy (USSR)66, 288 (1989), english translation of Opt. Spek- trosk. 66, 495 (1989)

    work page 1989

  37. [37]

    part II, Jour- nal de Physique36, 493 (1975)

    M.A.BouchiatandC.Bouchiat,Parityviolationinduced by weak neutral currents in atomic physics. part II, Jour- nal de Physique36, 493 (1975)

    work page 1975

  38. [38]

    C. S. Wood, S. C. Bennett, J. L. Roberts, D. Cho, and C. E. Wieman, Precision measurement of parity noncon- servation in cesium, Canadian Journal of Physics77, 7 (1999)

    work page 1999

  39. [39]

    Antypas, A

    D. Antypas, A. Fabricant, J. E. Stalnaker, K. Tsigutkin, V. V. Flambaum, and D. Budker, Isotopic variation of parity violation in atomic ytterbium, Nature Physics15, 120 (2018)

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    Antypas, A

    D. Antypas, A. M. Fabricant, J. E. Stalnaker, K. Tsigutkin, V. V. Flambaum, and D. Budker, Isotopic variation of parity violation in atomic ytterbium: De- scription of the measurement method and analysis of sys- tematic effects, Physical Review A100, 012503 (2019)

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    W. J. Childs and L. S. Goodman, Reanalysis of the hy- perfine structure of the4f66s2 7F Multiplet in147,149Sm, including measurements for the7F6 State, Physical Re- view A6, 2011 (1972)

    work page 2011

  42. [42]

    I. B. Khriplovich,Parity Nonconservation in Atomic Phenomena(Gordon and Breach, New York, 1991)

    work page 1991

  43. [43]

    A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, E. Peik, and P. O. Schmidt, Optical atomic clocks, Reviews of Modern Physics87, 637 (2015)

    work page 2015

  44. [44]

    Aeppli, K

    A. Aeppli, K. Kim, W. Warfield, M. S. Safronova, and J.Ye,Clockwith8×10 −19 systematicuncertainty,Phys- ical Review Letters133, 023401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Hinkley, J

    N. Hinkley, J. A. Sherman, N. B. Phillips, M. Schioppo, N. D. Lemke, K. Beloy, M. Pizzocaro, C. W. Oates, and A. D. Ludlow, An atomic clock with10 −18 instability, Science341, 1215 (2013)

    work page 2013

  46. [46]

    V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, and S. Schiller, Testing physics beyond the standard model through additional clock transitions in neutral ytterbium, Physical Review A98, 022501 (2018)

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    Ishiyama, K

    T. Ishiyama, K. Ono, T. Takano, A. Sunaga, and Y. Takahashi, Observation of an inner-shell orbital clock transition in neutral ytterbium atoms, Physical Review Letters130, 153402 (2023)

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    Ishiyama, K

    T. Ishiyama, K. Ono, H. Kawase, T. Takano, R. Asano, A. Sunaga, Y. Yamamoto, M. Tanaka, and Y. Taka- hashi, Orders-of-magnitude improvement in precision spectroscopy of an inner-shell orbital clock transition in neutral ytterbium, Nature Photonics 10.1038/s41566- 026-01857-8 (2026)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566- 2026

  49. [49]

    Verma, L

    M. Verma, L. Talamo, H. Sawaoka, and A. C. Vutha, Directobservationofahighlyforbiddenopticaltransition inSm : SrF 2, Phys. Rev. A100, 032502 (2019)

    work page 2019

  50. [50]

    R. L. Ahlefeldt, M. R. Hush, and M. J. Sellars, Ultranar- row optical inhomogeneous linewidth in a stoichiometric rare-earth crystal, Physical Review Letters117, 250504 (2016)

    work page 2016

  51. [51]

    A. O. Sushkov, O. P. Sushkov, and A. Yaresko, Effective electric field: Quantifying the sensitivity of searches for new P,T -odd physics withEuCl3 ·6H 2O, Physical Re- view A107, 062823 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    J. E. Lawler, A. J. Fittante, and E. A. D. Hartog, Atomic transition probabilities of neutral samarium, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics46, 215004 (2013)

    work page 2013

  53. [53]

    J. C. Berengut, D. Budker, C. Delaunay, V. V. Flam- baum, C. Frugiuele, E. Fuchs, C. Grojean, R. Harnik, R. Ozeri, G. Perez, and Y. Soreq, Probing new long- range interactions by isotope shift spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 091801 (2018)

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    Door, C.-H

    M. Door, C.-H. Yeh, M. Heinz, F. Kirk, C. Lyu, T. Miyagi, J. C. Berengut, J. Bieroń, K. Blaum, L. S. Dreissen, S. Eliseev, P. Filianin, M. Filzinger, E. Fuchs, H. A. Fürst, G. Gaigalas, Z. Harman, J. Herkenhoff, N. Huntemann, C. H. Keitel, K. Kromer, D. Lange, A. Rischka, C. Schweiger, A. Schwenk, N. Shimizu, and T. E. Mehlstäubler, Probing new bosons and...

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    J. C. Berengut and C. Delaunay, Precision isotope-shift spectroscopy for new physics searches and nuclear in- sights, Nature Reviews Physics7, 119 (2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    J. A. R. Griffith, G. R. Isaak, R. New, and M. P. Ralls, Anomaliesintheopticalisotopeshiftsofsamarium,Jour- nal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics14, 2769 (1981)

    work page 1981

  57. [57]

    W. H. King,Isotope Shifts in Atomic Spectra(Springer US, 1984)

    work page 1984

  58. [58]

    Derevianko, and C

    M.S.Safronova, D.Budker, D.DeMille, D.F.J.Kimball, A. Derevianko, and C. W. Clark, Search for new physics with atoms and molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 025008 (2018)

    work page 2018

  59. [59]

    V. V. Flambaum, Atomic and nuclear clocks, space-time variation of the fundamental constants and dark matter, inProceedings of the 1st International Online Conference on Atoms(MDPI,Basel, Switzerland,2026)publishedby MDPI/Sciforum

    work page 2026

  60. [60]

    Antypas, D

    D. Antypas, D. Budker, V. V. Flambaum, M. G. Ko- zlov, G. Perez, and J. Ye, Fast apparent oscillations of fundamental constants, Annalen der Physik532, 10.1002/andp.201900566 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.201900566 2020

  61. [61]

    Y. V. Stadnik and V. V. Flambaum, Can dark matter in- duce cosmological evolution of thefundamentalconstants of nature?, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 201301 (2015)

    work page 2015

  62. [62]

    Tretiak, X

    O. Tretiak, X. Zhang, N. L. Figueroa, D. Antypas, A. Brogna, A. Banerjee, G. Perez, and D. Budker, Im- proved bounds on ultralight scalar dark matter in the radio-frequency range, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 031301 (2022)

    work page 2022

  63. [63]

    V. D. Vedenin, V. N. Kulyasov, A. L. Kurbatov, N. V. Rodin, and M. V. Shubin,Jdependence of collisional broadening for fine-structure components of Sm I, Opt. Spectrosc. (Engl. Transl.); (United States)62:4(1987)

    work page 1987

  64. [64]

    A. Ya. Kraftmakher, Calculation of the amplitudes of M1 and E2 transitions between the4f66s2 7 Fand4f 66s2 5 D statesinthesamariumatom,Opt.Spectrosc.(USSR)66, 565 (1989)

    work page 1989

  65. [65]

    Ferrara, M

    C. Ferrara, M. Giarrusso, and F. Leone, Experimental atomic data of spectral lines - I. Cs, Ba, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu, Hf, Re, and Os in the 370-1000nm interval, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society527, 4440 (2023)

    work page 2023

  66. [66]

    W. F. Meggers, C. H. Corliss, and B. F. Scribner,Tables of spectral-line intensities: part 1- arranged by elements (National Bureau of Standards, 1975)

    work page 1975

  67. [67]

    Budker, W

    D. Budker, W. Gawlik, D. F. Kimball, S. M. Rochester, V. V. Yashchuk, and A. Weis, Resonant nonlinear magneto-optical effects in atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys.74, 9 1153 (2002)

    work page 2002

  68. [68]

    Bogdanovich, Usage of transformed functions for cal- culations of electric dipole transitions, Lith

    P. Bogdanovich, Usage of transformed functions for cal- culations of electric dipole transitions, Lith. Phys. J.31, 79 (1991)

    work page 1991

  69. [69]

    M. G. Kozlov, S. G. Porsev, and V. V. Flambaum, Man- ifestation of the nuclear anapole moment in the M1 tran- sitions in bismuth, J. Phys. B29, 689 (1996)

    work page 1996

  70. [70]

    Angeli and K

    I. Angeli and K. P. Marinova, Table of experimental nu- clear ground state charge radii: An update, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables99, 69 (2013)

    work page 2013

  71. [71]

    S.G.PorsevandM.G.Kozlov,Calculationofthenuclear spin-dependent parity-nonconserving amplitude for the (7s,F=4)→(7s,F=5) transition in Fr, Physical Review A 64, 064101 (2001)

    work page 2001

  72. [72]

    S. G. Porsev, M. S. Safronova, and M. G. Kozlov, Corre- lationeffectsinYb + andimplicationsforparityviolation, Physical Review A86, 022504 (2012)

    work page 2012

  73. [73]

    Sternheimer, On nuclear quadrupole moments, Phys- ical Review80, 102 (1950)

    R. Sternheimer, On nuclear quadrupole moments, Phys- ical Review80, 102 (1950)

    work page 1950

  74. [74]

    Dalgarno and J

    A. Dalgarno and J. T. Lewis, The exact calculation of long-range forces between atoms by perturbation theory, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences233, 70 (1955)

    work page 1955

  75. [75]

    Bouchiat, J

    M. Bouchiat, J. Guéna, and L. Pottier, Measurement of the M1 amplitude and hyperfine mixing between the 6S1/2-7S1/2 caesium states, Journal de Physique Lettres 45, 61 (1984)

    work page 1984

  76. [76]

    V. V. Flambaum and A. J. Mansour, Parity and time- reversal invariance violation in neutron-nucleus scatter- ing, Phys. Rev. C105, 015501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  77. [77]

    Fadeev and V

    P. Fadeev and V. V. Flambaum, Time-reversal invari- ance violation in neutron-nucleus scattering, Phys. Rev. C100, 015504 (2019)

    work page 2019

  78. [78]

    J. S. M. Ginges and V. V. Flambaum, Violations of fun- damental symmetries in atoms and tests of unification theories of elementary particles, Physics Reports397, 63 (2004)

    work page 2004

  79. [79]

    H. J. Metcalf and P. van der Straten,Laser Cooling and Trapping(Springer New York, 1999). METHODS A. Experiment InRef.[2], theidentificationofthe4f 66s2 5D1,2,3 levels relied on searching for weak, previously unobserved tran- sitions with small isotopic and hyperfine splitting and pressure broadening. The 7F→ 5Dtransitions are M1 transitions enabled by LS...

    work page 1999

  80. [80]

    transition. When the pulsed laser is tuned into resonance with a transition originat- ing from the7F1 state, it depletes the population of this level, thereby reducing the probe-light absorption, see Fig.2(1.1). The plotted signal corresponds to the AC component and is therefore zero off resonance. This con- firms that the transition originates from the7F...

    work page

Showing first 80 references.