pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.24174 · v1 · pith:6YQZ64A2new · submitted 2026-05-22 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · astro-ph.GA

The Sensitivity of Substructure Lensing to SIDM Core-collapse Model Variation

Charlie Mace , Birendra Dhanasingham , Zhichao Carton Zeng , Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine , Xiaolong Du , Annika H. G. Peter , Andrew Benson This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 14:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA
keywords SIDMsubstructure lensingcore collapsetwo-point correlation functiondeflection fieldgravitational lensingdark matter subhalos
0
0 comments X

The pith

Variations in modeling SIDM subhalo core collapse alter the two-point correlation function of lensing deflection fields at small scales.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Strong gravitational lensing offers a way to detect dark matter substructure and test self-interacting dark matter. Accurate predictions require modeling when and how SIDM subhalos undergo core collapse, yet that timeline is uncertain and small modeling choices can shift the lensing signal. The paper compares several modeling approaches: smooth density evolution versus instantaneous collapse, probabilistic collapse across a population versus tracking each halo separately, and different choices for the initial and final density profile parameters. It quantifies the impact of each choice on the two-point correlation function of the divergence and curl of the effective deflection field. Most variations produce detectable differences at small length scales, although whether those differences can actually be observed depends on the specific lensing probe.

Core claim

The paper tests methods of modeling core-collapsing halos and shows the effect of each variation on the two-point correlation function of the effective deflection field's divergence and curl. The tests cover smoothly evolving density profiles versus instantaneously collapsing halos, probabilistic collapse versus individual halo evolution, and variation of the initial and final density profile parameters. The two-point correlation function is sensitive to most of these variations at small length scales, but the detectability of these differences will depend on the observational probe.

What carries the argument

The two-point correlation function of the divergence and curl of the effective deflection field, which registers how choices in SIDM subhalo core-collapse modeling change lensing observables.

If this is right

  • The correlation function registers differences between smooth density evolution and instantaneous collapse.
  • Probabilistic population-level collapse versus tracking individual halos produces distinguishable effects at small scales.
  • Altering the initial and final density profile parameters changes the correlation function.
  • Whether these modeling differences can be observed depends on the chosen lensing probe.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Analyses that aim to constrain SIDM parameters from lensing data may need to marginalize over these core-collapse modeling choices to avoid systematic bias.
  • Cross-checks with other substructure observables such as stellar streams could test whether the same modeling sensitivities appear in independent data.
  • Extending the comparison to three-point statistics or to different SIDM interaction strengths would show whether the small-scale sensitivity persists.

Load-bearing premise

The tested modeling variations such as smooth versus instantaneous collapse and changes to density profile parameters capture the main physical uncertainties in the core-collapse timeline.

What would settle it

A measurement of the two-point correlation function at small scales that remains identical across all the tested core-collapse modeling choices would falsify the claimed sensitivity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.24174 by Andrew Benson, Annika H. G. Peter, Birendra Dhanasingham, Charlie Mace, Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine, Xiaolong Du, Zhichao Carton Zeng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The distribution of core-collapse acceleration factors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Our selection of core-collapse thresholds as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The abundance of subhalos within the 1-10 arcsecond [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Comparison of the monopole moment between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Multipole moments for CDM, SIDM full evolution, and SIDM early collapse models with two collapse thresholds from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Relative difference between the average monopole [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Multipole moments for CDM, SIDM full evolution, and SIDM binary collapse with variations on the collapse method [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Our truncation method for SIDM core-collapsing halos at three stages of evolution: the initial CDM profile ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Comparison of deflection angle profiles calculated from the gravothermal solution (Equation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Strong gravitational lensing has emerged as a powerful probe of dark matter substructure, and shows particularly strong promise as a test of self-interacting dark matter (SIDM). The compact halos produced by SIDM can leave distinct imprints on lensing observations, but the core-collapse timeline for subhalos is difficult to model accurately. This difficulty is an obstacle to accurate substructure lensing predictions, where small variations in core-collapsing subhalos can lead to significant differences in the lensing power. To quantify this problem and inform future lensing analyses, we test various methods of modeling core-collapsing halos and show the effect of each variation on the two-point correlation function of the effective deflection field's divergence and curl. Our tests include smoothly evolving density profiles versus instantaneously collapsing halos, probabilistic collapse versus individual halo evolution, and variation of the initial and final density profile parameters. We find that the two-point correlation function is sensitive to most of these variations at small length scales, but the detectability of these differences will depend on the observational probe.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that the two-point correlation function of the effective deflection field's divergence and curl is sensitive to most variations in SIDM subhalo core-collapse modeling—including smooth versus instantaneous collapse, probabilistic versus individual halo evolution, and changes to initial/final density profile parameters—at small length scales, with detectability depending on the observational probe.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work is significant for quantifying how core-collapse modeling choices propagate to lensing observables in SIDM, directly comparing simulation outputs to demonstrate sensitivity and thereby informing the precision required for future substructure lensing analyses.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph describing the tests performed): the tested modeling variations may not sufficiently capture the relevant physical uncertainties in the core-collapse timeline, as the SIDM cross-section (velocity dependence or magnitude) and subhalo orbital/environmental effects—which set the collapse timescale—are not varied; this limits the strength of the implication that the reported sensitivities bracket the main modeling challenges for lensing predictions.
  2. [Methods] Methods section: the manuscript provides insufficient detail on simulation setup (number of halos, resolution criteria, data exclusion rules) and the exact computation of the two-point correlation function, preventing verification of the statistical robustness of the sensitivity claims.
  3. [Results] Results section: the reported correlation functions lack error bars or uncertainty estimates, making it impossible to assess whether the differences between modeling choices are statistically significant rather than consistent with noise.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Notation for the effective deflection field divergence and curl could be clarified with an explicit equation in the methods.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions should include more detail on the length scales shown and the specific model variations plotted.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which have helped clarify the scope and presentation of our results. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to improve clarity, detail, and statistical rigor where possible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph describing the tests performed): the tested modeling variations may not sufficiently capture the relevant physical uncertainties in the core-collapse timeline, as the SIDM cross-section (velocity dependence or magnitude) and subhalo orbital/environmental effects—which set the collapse timescale—are not varied; this limits the strength of the implication that the reported sensitivities bracket the main modeling challenges for lensing predictions.

    Authors: We agree that the tested variations are confined to modeling choices (smooth vs. instantaneous collapse, probabilistic vs. individual evolution, and profile parameter changes) within a fixed core-collapse framework, rather than varying the underlying physical inputs such as the SIDM cross-section or orbital/environmental effects that determine collapse timescales. The manuscript's intent is to quantify sensitivity to these specific modeling decisions, not to claim they encompass all physical uncertainties. We have revised the abstract to explicitly state the scope of the variations considered and to avoid implying that they bracket all modeling challenges. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods] Methods section: the manuscript provides insufficient detail on simulation setup (number of halos, resolution criteria, data exclusion rules) and the exact computation of the two-point correlation function, preventing verification of the statistical robustness of the sensitivity claims.

    Authors: We acknowledge that additional methodological details are needed for reproducibility. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the Methods section to specify the number of simulated halos, resolution criteria employed, rules for data exclusion, and the precise algorithm used to compute the two-point correlation function of the deflection-field divergence and curl (including binning, normalization, and any averaging procedures). revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Results] Results section: the reported correlation functions lack error bars or uncertainty estimates, making it impossible to assess whether the differences between modeling choices are statistically significant rather than consistent with noise.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of uncertainty estimates limits assessment of statistical significance. We have added error bars (derived from bootstrap resampling or jackknife estimates across the halo sample) to all correlation-function plots in the revised Results section and have included a brief discussion of how these uncertainties affect the interpretation of differences between modeling variants. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; direct numerical comparisons of modeling variants

full rationale

The paper's central result is obtained by running SIDM subhalo simulations under discrete modeling choices (smooth vs instantaneous collapse, probabilistic vs per-halo evolution, varied initial/final density parameters) and directly measuring the resulting two-point correlation function of deflection divergence/curl. No parameter is fitted to a subset of the target statistic and then re-labeled as a prediction; no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that the present work then treats as external; the derivation chain consists of explicit simulation outputs compared to one another. The tested variations are therefore independent inputs, not tautological re-expressions of the output statistic.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; the central claim rests on standard assumptions in SIDM simulations and lensing calculations plus the specific modeling variations tested. No invented entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • initial and final density profile parameters
    The paper varies these parameters as part of the tested modeling choices; their specific values are not stated in the abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions in gravitational lensing and SIDM halo evolution simulations hold without re-derivation.
    Invoked implicitly when testing modeling methods on the deflection field statistics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5744 in / 1348 out tokens · 44843 ms · 2026-06-30T14:04:27.265782+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Gravothermal Collapse: Robust Against Baryonic Feedback

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Baryonic feedback mildly delays but does not stall gravothermal collapse in high-concentration SIDM halos and allows resumption in median-concentration cases, yielding feedback-history-dependent central densities.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 12 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    [71], with the addition of a truncation radius𝑟t (see Appendix A for more detail on the truncated profile)

    Density Profile We implement smoothly evolving SIDM halo density pro- files using the empirical model presented in Ref. [71], with the addition of a truncation radius𝑟t (see Appendix A for more detail on the truncated profile). This density evolution is piecewise in time, depending on whether the halo is in the early stages of evolution (core-formation) o...

  2. [2]

    Tocalculatethedeflectionangleasafunctionofradius,𝛽ˆ𝜎 ˆ𝑡, and truncation radius, we create a look-up table for Equation (6)

    Deflection Angle Profile Tomakegravitationallensingpredictionswemustcompute the deflection angle profile, which is calculated from the en- closedprojectedmasswithinadistance𝑟fromthehalocenter [39]: 𝛼(𝑟) ∝ 1 𝑟 ∫ 𝑟 0 d𝑟2D 𝑟2D ∫ ∞ −∞ d𝑧 𝜌 √︃ 𝑟2 2D +𝑧 2 .(7) We have not found a closed-form solution to this integral for our density profile, so we proceed numer...

  3. [3]

    Time evolution To retrieve the deflection angle profile for a particular sub- haloorline-of-sighthalo,wefirstdetermine𝛽ˆ𝜎 ˆ𝑡bycalculating theageandhaloparametersforthatindividualhalo,placingit attheappropriatepositionalongitsuniquecore-collapsetime- line. It is straightforward to calculateˆ𝑡for each halo, using the formation redshift and the redshift of o...

  4. [4]

    Core-collapse may be halted at some point as the gravothermal evolution is interrupted by other physical processes, such as black hole formation [2, 88–90]

    Collapse Threshold Variation Whileourgravothermalsolutionendswithacentraldensity that diverges as the collapse time is approached, the true final stateofacore-collapsedhaloremainsunknown. Core-collapse may be halted at some point as the gravothermal evolution is interrupted by other physical processes, such as black hole formation [2, 88–90]. To test how ...

    1974

  5. [5]

    Effective Multi-plane Lensing To quantify the collective contributions of line-of-sight structure to the lensing deflection, we use the effective multi- plane lensing framework detailed in [40]. This approach in- cludes the influence of line-of-sight structure through an ef- fective deflection fieldαeff: αeff(x)=∇𝜙 eff(x) + ∇ ×A eff(x).(8) Unlike in a sin...

  6. [6]

    In this section we will compute the correlation function for an ef- fective multiplane lens, and use it to disentangle line-of-sight effectsfromtheinfluenceofthemainlensingplane

    The Two-point Correlation Function The two-point correlation function is a powerful summary statisticthatencodesinformationaboutthedistributionofsub- structure, as well as their inner deflection angle profiles (and hence their density profiles) [34, 40, 41, 94, 100–105]. In this section we will compute the correlation function for an ef- fective multiplan...

  7. [7]

    The gravothermal profile includes a two-phase outer profile that transitions at the outer radius𝑟out, while the TNFWC profile does not

    include a constant density core, but they differ in their outer profiles. The gravothermal profile includes a two-phase outer profile that transitions at the outer radius𝑟out, while the TNFWC profile does not. This creates a modeling challenge, as it is not clear if there are TNFWC parameter choices that produce similar deflection angles profiles as the g...

  8. [8]

    C. S. Kochanek and M. J. White, A Quantitative study of interactingdarkmatterinhalos,Astrophys.J.543,514(2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0003483

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  9. [9]

    Balberg and S

    S. Balberg and S. L. Shapiro, Gravothermal collapse of self- interacting dark matter halos and the origin of massive black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 101301 (2002)

    2002

  10. [10]

    R.K.deNarayandS.S.McGaugh,Theinnerdynamicalmass across galaxy morphology: A weak scaling with total stellar mass, The Astrophysical Journal Letters782, L12 (2014)

    2014

  11. [11]

    K. A. Oman, J. F. Navarro, A. Fattahi, C. S. Frenk, T. Sawala, S.D.M.White,R.Bower,R.A.Crain,M.Furlong,M.Schaller, J. Schaye, and T. Theuns, The unexpected diversity of dwarf galaxy rotation curves, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society452, 3650 (2015)

    2015

  12. [12]

    Errani, J

    R. Errani, J. Peñarrubia, and M. G. Walker, Systematics in virialmassestimatorsforpressure-supportedsystems,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society481, 5073 (2018)

    2018

  13. [13]

    J. I. Read, M. G. Walker, and P. Steger, Dark matter heats up indwarfgalaxies,MonthlyNoticesoftheRoyalAstronomical Society484, 1401 (2019)

    2019

  14. [14]

    N. C. Relatores, A. B. Newman, J. D. Simon, R. S. Ellis, P. Truong, L. Blitz, A. Bolatto, C. Martin, M. Matuszewski, P. Morrissey, and J. D. Neill, The dark matter distributions in low-mass disk galaxies. ii. the inner density profiles, The Astrophysical Journal887, 94 (2019)

    2019

  15. [15]

    I.M.E.Santos-Santos,J.F.Navarro,A.Robertson,A.Benítez- Llambay,K.A.Oman,M.R.Lovell,C.S.Frenk,A.D.Ludlow, A.Fattahi,andA.Ritz,Baryoniccluestothepuzzlingdiversity of dwarf galaxy rotation curves, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society495, 58 (2020)

    2020

  16. [16]

    K.Hayashi,M.Chiba,andT.Ishiyama,Diversityofdarkmatter density profiles in the galactic dwarf spheroidal satellites, The Astrophysical Journal904, 45 (2020)

    2020

  17. [17]

    P. Li, F. Lelli, S. McGaugh, and J. Schombert, A comprehen- sivecatalogofdarkmatterhalomodelsforsparcgalaxies,The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series247, 31 (2020)

    2020

  18. [18]

    A. Cruz, A. Brooks, M. Lisanti, A. H. G. Peter, R. Geda, T. Quinn, M. Tremmel, F. Munshi, B. Keller, and J. Wadsley, Dwarf diversity in𝜆cdm with baryons (2025), arXiv:2510.11800 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Kaplinghat, S

    M. Kaplinghat, S. Tulin, and H.-B. Yu, Dark matter halos as particle colliders: Unified solution to small-scale structure puzzles from dwarfs to clusters, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 041302 (2016)

    2016

  20. [20]

    Kamada, M

    A. Kamada, M. Kaplinghat, A. B. Pace, and H.-B. Yu, Self- interacting dark matter can explain diverse galactic rotation curves, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 111102 (2017)

    2017

  21. [21]

    Sameie, H.-B

    O. Sameie, H.-B. Yu, L. V. Sales, M. Vogelsberger, and J. Zavala, Self-interacting dark matter subhalos in the Milky Way’s tides, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 141102 (2020)

    2020

  22. [22]

    C.A.Correa,Constrainingvelocity-dependentself-interacting dark matter with the Milky Way’s dwarf spheroidal galaxies, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society503, 920 (2021)

    2021

  23. [23]

    Cyr-Racine, and M

    Z.C.Zeng,A.H.G.Peter,X.Du,A.Benson,S.Kim,F.Jiang, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, and M. Vogelsberger, Core-collapse, evapo- ration,andtidaleffects: thelifestoryofaself-interactingdark matter subhalo, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society513, 4845 (2022)

    2022

  24. [24]

    C. A. Correa, M. Schaller, S. Ploeckinger, N. Anau Montel, C. Weniger, and S. Ando, TangoSIDM: tantalizing models of self-interactingdarkmatter,MonthlyNoticesoftheRoyalAs- tronomical Society517, 3045 (2022)

    2022

  25. [25]

    E. O. Nadler, D. Yang, and H.-B. Yu, A self-interacting dark mattersolutiontotheextremediversityoflow-masshaloprop- erties, The Astrophysical Journal Letters958, L39 (2023)

    2023

  26. [27]

    Z. C. Zeng, A. H. G. Peter, X. Du, S. Yang, A. Benson, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, F. Jiang, C. Mace, and R. B. Metcalf, Evolution and properties of self-interacting dark matter subhalos until core collapse, Phys. Rev. D111, 063001 (2025)

    2025

  27. [28]

    Z. C. Zeng, A. H. G. Peter, X. Du, A. Benson, J. Li, C. Mace, and S. Yang, Diversity and universality: evolution of dwarf galaxies with self-interacting dark matter, (2024), arXiv:2412.14621 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [29]

    M. G. Roberts, M. Kaplinghat, M. Valli, and H.-B. Yu, Gravothermal collapse and the diversity of galactic rotation curves, (2024), arXiv:2407.15005 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [30]

    R. A. Flores and J. R. Primack, Observational and Theoretical Constraints on Singular Dark Matter Halos,427, L1 (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9402004 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  30. [31]

    Moore, Evidence against dissipation-less dark matter from observations of galaxy haloes,370, 629 (1994)

    B. Moore, Evidence against dissipation-less dark matter from observations of galaxy haloes,370, 629 (1994)

    1994

  31. [32]

    J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, A Universal DensityProfilefromHierarchicalClustering,490,493(1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9611107 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  32. [33]

    Moore, T

    B. Moore, T. Quinn, F. Governato, J. Stadel, and G. Lake, Coldcollapseandthecorecatastrophe,MonthlyNoticesofthe Royal Astronomical Society310, 1147 (1999)

    1999

  33. [34]

    D. H. Weinberg, J. S. Bullock, F. Governato, R. K. de Naray, and A. H. G. Peter, Cold dark matter: Controversies on small scales,ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciences112, 12249 (2015)

    2015

  34. [35]

    Gentile, P

    G. Gentile, P. Salucci, U. Klein, D. Vergani, and P. Kalberla, The cored distribution of dark matter in spiral galax- ies, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Soci- ety351, 903 (2004), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/351/3/903/3595222/351-3-903.pdf

    2004

  35. [36]

    Kaplinghat, T

    M. Kaplinghat, T. Ren, and H.-B. Yu, Dark matter cores and cuspsinspiralgalaxiesandtheirexplanations,JournalofCos- mology and Astroparticle Physics2020(06), 027

  36. [37]

    Bhattacharyya, S

    J. Bhattacharyya, S. Adhikari, A. Banerjee, S. More, A. Ku- mar, E. O. Nadler, and S. Chatterjee, The signatures of self- interacting dark matter and subhalo disruption on cluster sub- structure, The Astrophysical Journal932, 30 (2022)

    2022

  37. [38]

    Mao and P

    S. Mao and P. Schneider, Evidence for substructure in lens galaxies?, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Soci- ety295, 587 (1998), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/295/3/587/18408388/295-3-587.pdf

    1998

  38. [39]

    Dalal and C

    N. Dalal and C. S. Kochanek, Direct detection of cold dark 15 10 2 10 1 100 101 102 r/rs 100 101 102 103 (r)/ (60 × rs) pyHalo Method (r′ s = r′ c) TNFWC: r′ c = rc TNFWC: r′ c = 0.1 × rc TNFWC: r′ c = 10 × rc Gravothermal Solution 10 2 10 1 100 101 102 r/rs 100 101 (r)/ (60 × rs) NFW Normalization (r′ s = rs) TNFWC: r′ c = rc TNFWC: r′ c = 0.1 × rc TNFWC...

    2002

  39. [40]

    A. M. Nierenberg, T. Treu, S. A. Wright, C. D. Fassnacht, and M. W. Auger, Detection of substructure with adaptive optics integral field spectroscopy of the gravitational lens B1422+231,MonthlyNoticesoftheRoyalAstronomicalSoci- ety442,2434(2014),https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/442/3/2434/3544969/stu862.pdf

    2014

  40. [41]

    Y. D. Hezaveh, N. Dalal, D. P. Marrone, Y.-Y. Mao, W. Morn- ingstar, D. Wen, R. D. Blandford, J. E. Carlstrom, C. D. Fass- nacht, G. P. Holder, A. Kemball, P. J. Marshall, N. Murray, L. P. Levasseur, J. D. Vieira, and R. H. Wechsler, Detection of lensing substructure using alma observations of the dusty galaxy SDP.81, The Astrophysical Journal823, 37 (2016)

    2016

  41. [42]

    Hezaveh, N

    Y. Hezaveh, N. Dalal, G. Holder, T. Kisner, M. Kuhlen, and L. P. Levasseur, Measuring the power spectrum of dark mat- ter substructure using strong gravitational lensing, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2016(11), 048

  42. [43]

    A. M. Nierenberg, T. Treu, G. Brammer, A. H. G. Peter, C. D. Fassnacht, C. R. Keeton, C. S. Kochanek, K. B. Schmidt, D. Sluse, and S. A. Wright, Probing dark matter substruc- ture in the gravitational lens HE 0435-1223 with the WFC3 grism, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Soci- ety471,2224(2017),https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/471/2/2...

    2017

  43. [44]

    Probing the small-scale structure in strongly lensed systems via transdimensional inference

    T. Daylan, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, A. Diaz Rivero, C. Dvorkin, and D.P.Finkbeiner,ProbingtheSmall-scaleStructureinStrongly Lensed Systems via Transdimensional Inference,854, 141 (2018), arXiv:1706.06111 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  44. [45]

    Gilman, S

    D. Gilman, S. Birrer, T. Treu, A. Nierenberg, and A. Ben- son, Probing dark matter structure down to 107 solar masses: flux ratio statistics in gravitational lenses with line-of-sight haloes, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Soci- ety487,5721(2019),https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/487/4/5721/28901702/stz1593.pdf

    2019

  45. [46]

    Gilman, J

    D. Gilman, J. Bovy, T. Treu, A. Nierenberg, S. Birrer, A. Benson, and O. Sameie, Strong lensing signatures of self- interactingdarkmatterinlow-masshaloes,507,2432(2021), arXiv:2105.05259 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  46. [47]

    Dhanasingham, F.-Y

    B. Dhanasingham, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, A. H. G. Peter, A. Ben- son, and D. Gilman, Interlopers speak out: studying the dark universe using small-scale lensing anisotropies, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 518, 5843 (2022), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/518/4/5843/47852558/stac2993.pdf

    2022

  47. [48]

    Dhanasingham, F.-Y

    B. Dhanasingham, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, C. Mace, A. H. G. Peter, and A. Benson, Anisotropic strong lensing as a probe of dark matter self-interactions, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society526, 5455 (2023), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/526/4/5455/53175654/stad3099.pdf

    2023

  48. [49]

    Vegetti, S

    S. Vegetti, S. Birrer, G. Despali, C. D. Fassnacht, D. Gilman, Y.Hezaveh,L.P.Levasseur,J.P.McKean,D.M.Powell,C.M. O’Riordan,andG.Vernardos,Stronggravitationallensingasa probeofdarkmatter(2023),arXiv:2306.11781[astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  49. [50]

    Wagner-Carena, J

    S. Wagner-Carena, J. Aalbers, S. Birrer, E. O. Nadler, E. Darragh-Ford, P. J. Marshall, and R. H. Wechsler, From images to dark matter: End-to-end inference of substructure from hundreds of strong gravitational lenses, The Astrophysi- cal Journal942, 75 (2023)

    2023

  50. [51]

    JWST lensed quasar dark matter survey IV: Stringent warm dark matter constraints from the joint reconstruction of extended lensed arcs and quasar flux ratios

    D. Gilman, A. M. Nierenberg, T. Treu, C. Gannon, X. Du, H. Paugnat, S. Birrer, A. J. Benson, P. Mozumdar, K. C. Wong,D.Williams,R.E.Keeley,K.N.Abazajian,T.Anguita, V. N. Bennert, S. G. Djorgovski, S. H. Hoenig, A. Kusenko, M.Malkan,T.Morishita,V.Motta,L.A.Moustakas,W.Sheu, D. Sluse, D. Stern, and M. Stiavelli, JWST lensed quasar dark mattersurveyIV:String...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  51. [52]

    D.Kong,E.O.Nadler,andH.-B.Yu,Stronglensingperturbers from the SIDM Concerto suite (2025), arXiv:2510.01491 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [53]

    Gannon, A

    C. Gannon, A. Nierenberg, A. Benson, R. Keeley, X. Du, and D. Gilman, Dark matter substructure: A lensing perspective (2025), arXiv:2501.17362 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [54]

    Vegetti, O

    S. Vegetti, O. Czoske, and L. V. E. Koopmans, Quan- tifying dwarf satellites through gravitational imaging: 16 the case of SDSS J120602.09+514229.5, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society407, 225 (2010), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/407/1/225/3073188/mnras0407-0225.pdf

    2010

  54. [55]

    Vegetti, L

    S. Vegetti, L. V. E. Koopmans, A. Bolton, T. Treu, and R. Gavazzi, Detection of a dark substruc- ture through gravitational imaging, Monthly No- tices of the Royal Astronomical Society408, 1969 (2010), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/408/4/1969/4219080/mnras0408-1969.pdf

    1969

  55. [56]

    Gravitational detection of a low-mass dark satellite at cosmological distance

    S. Vegetti, D. J. Lagattuta, J. P. McKean, M. W. Auger, C. D. Fassnacht,andL.V.E.Koopmans,Gravitationaldetectionofa low-mass dark satellite galaxy at cosmological distance,481, 341 (2012), arXiv:1201.3643 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  56. [57]

    Inference of the Cold Dark Matter substructure mass function at z=0.2 using strong gravitational lenses

    S.Vegetti,L.V.E.Koopmans,M.W.Auger,T.Treu,andA.S. Bolton, Inference of the cold dark matter substructure mass functionatz=0.2usingstronggravitationallenses,442,2017 (2014), arXiv:1405.3666 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  57. [58]

    littledarkdot

    S. Li, R. Li, K. Wang, Z. Jia, X. Cao, C. S. Frenk, F. Jiang, A.Amvrosiadis,S.Cole,Q.He,S.C.Lange,R.Massey,J.W. Nightingale,A.Robertson,M.vonWietersheim-Kramsta,and X.Ma,The“littledarkdot”: Evidenceforself-interactingdark matter in the strong lens SDSS J0946+1006?, The Astrophys- ical Journal994, 201 (2025)

    2025

  58. [59]

    Massari, G

    S.Vegetti,S.D.M.White,J.P.McKean,D.M.Powell,C.Sp- ingola, D. Massari, G. Despali, and C. D. Fassnacht, A possi- ble challenge for cold and warm dark matter, Nature Astron- omy10.1038/s41550-025-02746-w(2026),arXiv:2601.02466 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2026

  59. [60]

    Gilman, S

    D. Gilman, S. Birrer, A. Nierenberg, T. Treu, X. Du, and A. Benson, Warm dark matter chills out: constraints on the halomassfunctionandthefree-streaminglengthofdarkmatter with eight quadruple-image strong gravitational lenses,491, 6077 (2020), arXiv:1908.06983 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  60. [61]

    Gilman, X

    D. Gilman, X. Du, A. Benson, S. Birrer, A. Nierenberg, and T. Treu, Constraints on the mass–concentration relation of cold dark matter haloes with 11 strong gravitational lenses, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 492, L12 (2019), https://academic.oup.com/mnrasl/article- pdf/492/1/L12/56978865/mnrasl_492_1_l12.pdf

    2019

  61. [62]

    Despali, L

    J.-W.Hsueh,W.Enzi,S.Vegetti,M.W.Auger,C.D.Fassnacht, G. Despali, L. V. E. Koopmans, and J. P. McKean, SHARP – VII. new constraints on the dark matter free-streaming prop- erties and substructure abundance from gravitationally lensed quasars, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Soci- ety492,3047(2020),https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/492/2...

    2020

  62. [63]

    E. O. Nadler, S. Birrer, D. Gilman, R. H. Wechsler, X. Du, A. Benson, A. M. Nierenberg, and T. Treu, Dark matter con- straints from a unified analysis of strong gravitational lenses and Milky Way satellite galaxies, The Astrophysical Journal 917, 7 (2021)

    2021

  63. [64]

    Gilman, A

    D. Gilman, A. Benson, J. Bovy, S. Birrer, T. Treu, and A. Nierenberg, The primordial matter power spectrum on sub-galactic scales, Monthly No- tices of the Royal Astronomical Society512, 3163 (2022), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/512/3/3163/43221312/stac670.pdf

    2022

  64. [65]

    Dhanasingham, F.-Y

    B. Dhanasingham, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, and D. Gilman, Neu- ral posterior estimation of the line-of-sight and subhalo populations in galaxy-scale strong lensing systems (2025), arXiv:2511.17732 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [66]

    C.Mace,Z.C.Zeng,A.H.G.Peter,X.Du,S.Yang,A.Benson, andM.Vogelsberger,Convergencetestsofself-interactingdark matter simulations, Phys. Rev. D110, 123024 (2024)

    2024

  66. [67]

    Palubski, O

    I. Palubski, O. Slone, M. Kaplinghat, M. Lisanti, and F. Jiang, Numerical challenges in modeling gravothermal collapse in self-interacting dark matter halos, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2024(09), 074

  67. [68]

    Kamionkowski, K

    M. Kamionkowski, K. Sigurdson, and O. Slone, Numerical evolutionofself-gravitatinghalosofself-interactingdarkmat- ter (2025), arXiv:2506.04334 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  68. [69]

    B., Bartolo, N., Basak, S., Battye, R., Benabed, K., Bernard, J.-P., Bersanelli, M., Bielewicz, P., Bock, J

    Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Ashdown, M.,Aumont,J.,Baccigalupi,C.,Ballardini,M.,Banday,A.J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartolo, N., Basak, S., Battye, R., Benabed, K., Bernard, J.-P., Bersanelli, M., Bielewicz, P., Bock, J. J., Bond, J. R., Borrill, J., Bouchet, F. R., Boulanger, F., Bucher, M., Burigana, C., Butler, R. C., Calabrese, E., Cardoso...

    2020

  69. [70]

    Springel, E pur si muove: Galilean-invariant cosmologi- cal hydrodynamical simulations on a moving mesh, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society401, 791 (2010)

    V. Springel, E pur si muove: Galilean-invariant cosmologi- cal hydrodynamical simulations on a moving mesh, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society401, 791 (2010)

    2010

  70. [71]

    Vogelsberger, J

    M. Vogelsberger, J. Zavala, and A. Loeb, Subhaloes in self- interactinggalacticdarkmatterhaloes,MonthlyNoticesofthe Royal Astronomical Society423, 3740 (2012)

    2012

  71. [72]

    Vogelsberger and J

    M. Vogelsberger and J. Zavala, Direct detection of self- interacting dark matter, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society430, 1722 (2013)

    2013

  72. [73]

    M.Vogelsberger,J.Zavala,C.Simpson,andA.Jenkins,Dwarf galaxies in CDM and SIDM with baryons: observational probes of the nature of dark matter, Monthly Notices of the 17 Royal Astronomical Society444, 3684 (2014)

    2014

  73. [74]

    A. J. Benson, Galacticus: A semi-analytic model of galaxy formation, New Astronomy17, 175 (2012)

    2012

  74. [75]

    D. Yang, E. O. Nadler, and H.-B. Yu, Strong dark matter self- interactionsdiversifyhalopopulationswithinandsurrounding the Milky Way, The Astrophysical Journal949, 67 (2023)

    2023

  75. [76]

    Slone, F

    O. Slone, F. Jiang, M. Lisanti, and M. Kaplinghat, Orbital evolution of satellite galaxies in self-interacting dark matter models, Phys. Rev. D107, 043014 (2023)

    2023

  76. [77]

    N.J.Outmezguine,K.K.Boddy,S.Gad-Nasr,M.Kaplinghat, and L. Sagunski, Universal gravothermal evolution of isolated self-interactingdarkmatterhalosforvelocity-dependentcross- sections, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Soci- ety523,4786(2023),https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/523/3/4786/50681276/stad1705.pdf

    2023

  77. [78]

    S.Yang,X.Du,Z.C.Zeng,A.Benson,F.Jiang,E.O.Nadler, and A. H. G. Peter, Gravothermal solutions of SIDM halos: Mapping from constant to velocity-dependent cross section, The Astrophysical Journal946, 47 (2023)

    2023

  78. [79]

    Zhong, D

    Y.-M. Zhong, D. Yang, and H.-B. Yu, The impact of baryonic potentials on the gravothermal evolu- tion of self-interacting dark matter haloes, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society526, 758 (2023), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/526/1/758/51771239/stad2765.pdf

    2023

  79. [80]

    M. W. Auger, T. Treu, A. S. Bolton, R. Gavazzi, L. V. E. Koopmans,P.J.Marshall,L.A.Moustakas,andS.Burles,The Sloan Lens ACS survey. X. stellar, dynamical, and total mass correlations ofmassive early-type galaxies,The Astrophysical Journal724, 511 (2010)

    2010

  80. [81]

    Wu and Y

    Q. Wu and Y. Shen, A Catalog of Quasar Properties from Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 16,263, 42 (2022), arXiv:2209.03987 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2022

Showing first 80 references.