Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 minor 68 references

Thermodynamics of classifiers

T0 review · 0 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-06-30 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Bayes error in binary Markov classifiers is bounded from below by thermodynamic costs including entropy production.

desk verdict The paper derives explicit lower bounds on Bayes error from entropy production and dynamical activity for Markov-process classifiers, with derivations that hold up under the stated assumptions. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.24365 v2 pith:ZEXHYJVT submitted 2026-05-23 cond-mat.stat-mech quant-ph

Yoshihiko Hasegawa This is my paper
classification cond-mat.stat-mechquant-ph
keywords thermodynamicsofclassifiersBayeserrorentropyproductiondynamicalactivityMarkovprocesseserror-costtrade-offinformationprocessingquantum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper derives lower bounds on the Bayes error for binary classification performed by Markov processes, expressed in terms of thermodynamic quantities such as entropy production and dynamical activity. It shows that vanishing thermodynamic costs force the error to 1/2, the level of random guessing, while higher costs permit lower errors. Because the Bayes error is the minimum error achievable by any classifier, these bounds apply universally to classification under given thermodynamic constraints. This establishes a fundamental trade-off between accuracy and energy-related costs in information processing systems.

What carries the argument

Inequalities linking Bayes error to entropy production and dynamical activity in Markovian classifiers.

What would settle it

A physical or simulated classifier achieving a Bayes error below the bound for its measured entropy production would falsify the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

By modeling classification as a Markov process, the paper obtains inequalities that lower-bound the Bayes error using entropy production and dynamical activity; zero values of these quantities imply a Bayes error of at least 1/2, and the quantum generalization bounds the error by the variance of the Hamiltonian.

Load-bearing premise

The classifier operates as a Markov process whose thermodynamic quantities can be directly related to the Bayes error via the derived inequalities.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • When entropy production vanishes, Bayes error reaches 1/2.
  • When dynamical activity vanishes, Bayes error reaches 1/2.
  • Greater thermodynamic costs enable lower Bayes error.
  • The classification error cannot fall below these bounds for given costs.
  • The quantum classifier's Bayes error is bounded below by the Hamiltonian variance.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These bounds could guide the design of energy-efficient classifiers by quantifying the minimum cost for a target error rate.
  • Similar trade-offs might apply to other information processing tasks beyond classification.
  • Experimental tests in physical systems implementing Markovian dynamics could verify the bounds.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives lower bounds on the Bayes error for binary classification realized as a Markov process, expressed in terms of thermodynamic costs including entropy production and dynamical activity. It shows that vanishing entropy production or dynamical activity implies a Bayes error of 1/2 (random guessing), while nonzero costs permit lower error. The bounds apply to the optimal classifier. A quantum generalization is discussed in which the Bayes error is bounded below by the variance of the Hamiltonian.

Significance. If the derivations hold under the stated Markovian modeling assumptions, the work establishes a concrete error-cost trade-off in thermodynamic information processing. The fact that the bounds apply directly to the Bayes error (the minimal achievable error) and recover the random-guessing limit at zero cost is a clear strength. The approach relies on standard definitions from stochastic thermodynamics and contains no free parameters in the final inequalities. The quantum extension, while brief, points to a possible generalization.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'dynamical activity' without a brief definition or citation; the main text should introduce this quantity explicitly in the model section to ensure accessibility for readers outside stochastic thermodynamics.
  2. The quantum generalization is described only at the level of a statement; if this is intended as a derived result rather than a conjecture, the relevant mapping from the classical Markov process to the quantum Hamiltonian should be stated more explicitly.
  3. A short comparison paragraph relating the derived bounds to prior thermodynamic uncertainty relations or speed limits in information processing would help situate the contribution.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive and accurate summary of our manuscript, including its significance for error-cost trade-offs in thermodynamic information processing. We note the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained under model assumptions

full rationale

The paper derives lower bounds on Bayes error for binary classification realized as a Markov process, expressed in terms of entropy production and dynamical activity. These inequalities follow from standard definitions of thermodynamic quantities for Markov chains and the explicit mapping of trajectories to class labels. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation; the central results are obtained directly from the process dynamics without renaming known empirical patterns or smuggling ansatzes. The quantum generalization is likewise presented as a variance bound without circular reduction. The derivation chain is therefore independent of its target quantities.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the modeling choice that classification occurs via Markov processes whose thermodynamic observables directly constrain the Bayes error; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Classification is performed by a system whose dynamics are Markovian.
    The study explicitly states it considers classification based on Markov processes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Thermodynamics of classifiers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZEXHYJVT

@misc{pith2026260524365,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Thermodynamics of classifiers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZEXHYJVT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.24365}
}
abstract

Reducing computational accuracy can lower energy consumption, and this principle is widely used to improve energy efficiency in computing. This raises a fundamental question: what is the quantitative relationship between error and thermodynamic cost in information processing? In this study, we derive the error-cost trade-off in the binary classifier by considering classification based on Markov processes. We obtain the lower bounds on the Bayes error in terms of thermodynamic costs such as entropy production and dynamical activity. Our results show that when entropy production or dynamical activity vanishes, the Bayes error reaches $1/2$, equivalent to random guessing, while greater thermodynamic costs enable lower error. This establishes a fundamental trade-off between error and cost in information processing by thermodynamic systems. Because the Bayes error provides the lowest achievable error among all possible classifiers, the classification error cannot fall below the obtained bounds given the entropy production or dynamical activity. We also discuss the quantum generalization and show that the Bayes error of the quantum classifier is bounded from below by the variance of the Hamiltonian.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.24365 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Landauer, Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process, IBM J

    R. Landauer, Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process, IBM J. Res. Dev.5, 183 (1961)

    work page 1961

  2. [2]

    C. H. Bennett, Notes on Landauer’s principle, reversible computation, and Maxwell’s demon, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys.34, 501 (2003)

    work page 2003

  3. [3]

    C. H. Bennett, Logical reversibility of computation, IBM J. Res. Dev.17, 525 (1973)

    work page 1973

  4. [4]

    W. H. Zurek, Thermodynamic cost of computation, al- gorithmic complexity and the information metric, Nature 341, 119 (1989)

    work page 1989

  5. [5]

    Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation the- orems and molecular machines, Rep

    U. Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation the- orems and molecular machines, Rep. Prog. Phys.75, 126001 (2012)

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Sagawa,Thermodynamics of Information Processing in Small Systems, 1st ed., Springer Theses (2013) pp

    T. Sagawa,Thermodynamics of Information Processing in Small Systems, 1st ed., Springer Theses (2013) pp. XVI, 120

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    Goldt and U

    S. Goldt and U. Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics of learning, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 010601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Kolchinsky and D

    A. Kolchinsky and D. H. Wolpert, Thermodynamic costs of turing machines, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033312 (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    Ikeda, T

    K. Ikeda, T. Uda, D. Okanohara, and S. Ito, Speed- accuracy relations for diffusion models: Wisdom from nonequilibrium thermodynamics and optimal transport, Phys. Rev. X15, 031031 (2025)

    2025

  2. [10]

    D. H. Wolpert, The stochastic thermodynamics of com- putation, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.52, 193001 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    Mittal, A survey of techniques for approximate com- puting, ACM Comput

    S. Mittal, A survey of techniques for approximate com- puting, ACM Comput. Surv.48(2016)

    2016

  4. [12]

    V. Leon, M. A. Hanif, G. Armeniakos, X. Jiao, M. Shafique, K. Pekmestzi, and D. Soudris, Approxi- mate computing survey, part ii: Application-specific & architectural approximation techniques and applications, ACM Comput. Surv.57(2025)

    2025

  5. [13]

    A. C. Barato and U. Seifert, Thermodynamic uncertainty relation for biomolecular processes, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 158101 (2015)

    2015

  6. [14]

    T. R. Gingrich, J. M. Horowitz, N. Perunov, and J. L. England, Dissipation bounds all steady-state current fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 120601 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    J. P. Garrahan, Simple bounds on fluctuations and un- certainty relations for first-passage times of counting ob- servables, Phys. Rev. E95, 032134 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    Dechant and S.-i

    A. Dechant and S.-i. Sasa, Current fluctuations and transport efficiency for general Langevin systems, J. Stat. Mech: Theory Exp.2018, 063209 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Di Terlizzi and M

    I. Di Terlizzi and M. Baiesi, Kinetic uncertainty relation, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.52, 02LT03 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    Hasegawa and T

    Y. Hasegawa and T. Van Vu, Uncertainty relations in stochastic processes: An information inequality ap- proach, Phys. Rev. E99, 062126 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    Hasegawa and T

    Y. Hasegawa and T. Van Vu, Fluctuation theorem un- certainty relation, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 110602 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    A. M. Timpanaro, G. Guarnieri, J. Goold, and G. T. Landi, Thermodynamic uncertainty relations from ex- change fluctuation theorems, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 090604 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    Dechant and S.-i

    A. Dechant and S.-i. Sasa, Fluctuation–response inequal- ity out of equilibrium, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.117, 6430 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    V. T. Vo, T. Van Vu, and Y. Hasegawa, Unified approach to classical speed limit and thermodynamic uncertainty relation, Phys. Rev. E102, 062132 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Koyuk and U

    T. Koyuk and U. Seifert, Thermodynamic uncertainty re- lation for time-dependent driving, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 260604 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    Saryal, H

    S. Saryal, H. M. Friedman, D. Segal, and B. K. Agar- walla, Thermodynamic uncertainty relation in thermal transport, Phys. Rev. E100, 042101 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    Prech, G

    K. Prech, G. T. Landi, F. Meier, N. Nurgalieva, P. P. Potts, R. Silva, and M. T. Mitchison, Optimal time esti- 14 Bound Observable Thermodynamic quantity Initial condition P min err ≥ 1 2 1−sin 1 2 √ 2 R τ 0 √ Σ⊕(t) t dt z(τ) Σ⊕(τ) z(0)(0) =z (1)(0) P min err ≥ 1 2 1−sin 1 2 R...

    2024

  18. [26]

    C. M. Bishop,Pattern Recognition and Machine Learn- ing, Information Science and Statistics (Springer, New York, 2006)

    2006

  19. [27]

    L. R. Rabiner, A tutorial on hidden markov models and selected applications in speech recognition, Proc. IEEE 77, 257 (1989)

    1989

  20. [28]

    Smyth, Clustering sequences with hidden Markov models, inAdv

    P. Smyth, Clustering sequences with hidden Markov models, inAdv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., Vol. 9, edited by M. C. Mozer, M. Jordan, and T. Petsche (1996)

    1996

  21. [29]

    Esling and C

    P. Esling and C. Agon, Time-series data mining, ACM Comput. Surv.45(2012)

    2012

  22. [30]

    J. J. Hopfield, Kinetic proofreading: A new mechanism for reducing errors in biosynthetic processes requiring high specificity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA71, 4135 (1974)

    1974

  23. [31]

    Ninio, Kinetic amplification of enzyme discrimination, Biochimie57, 587 (1975)

    J. Ninio, Kinetic amplification of enzyme discrimination, Biochimie57, 587 (1975)

    1975

  24. [32]

    Kirby and A

    D. Kirby and A. Zilman, Proofreading does not result in more reliable ligand discrimination in receptor signaling due to its inherent stochasticity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA120, e2212795120 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    Murugan, D

    A. Murugan, D. A. Huse, and S. Leibler, Discriminatory proofreading regimes in nonequilibrium systems, Phys. Rev. X4, 021016 (2014)

    2014

  26. [34]

    Hartich, A

    D. Hartich, A. C. Barato, and U. Seifert, Nonequilibrium sensing and its analogy to kinetic proofreading, New J. Phys.17, 055026 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    Rao and L

    R. Rao and L. Peliti, Thermodynamics of accuracy in ki- netic proofreading: dissipation and efficiency trade-offs, J. Stat. Mech.2015, P06001 (2015)

    2015

  28. [36]

    Berx and K

    J. Berx and K. Proesmans, Trade-offs and thermodynam- ics of energy-relay proofreading, J. R. Soc. Interface21, 20240232 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    Peres and W

    A. Peres and W. K. Wootters, Optimal detection of quan- tum information, Phys. Rev. Lett.66, 1119 (1991)

    1991

  30. [38]

    Massar and S

    S. Massar and S. Popescu, Optimal extraction of infor- mation from finite quantum ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1259 (1995)

    1995

  31. [39]

    R. D. Gill and S. Massar, State estimation for large en- sembles, Phys. Rev. A61, 042312 (2000)

    2000

  32. [40]

    A. K. Ekert, C. M. Alves, D. K. L. Oi, M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and L. C. Kwek, Direct estimations of lin- ear and nonlinear functionals of a quantum state, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 217901 (2002)

    2002

  33. [41]

    Ac´ ın, E

    A. Ac´ ın, E. Bagan, M. Baig, L. Masanes, and R. Mu˜ noz- Tapia, Multiple-copy two-state discrimination with indi- vidual measurements, Phys. Rev. A71, 032338 (2005)

    2005

  34. [42]

    C. W. Helstrom, Quantum detection and estimation the- ory, J. Stat. Phys.1, 231 (1969)

    1969

  35. [43]

    C. W. Helstrom,Quantum detection and estimation the- ory(Academic Press, New York, 1976)

    1976

  36. [44]

    Seifert, Entropy production along a stochastic tra- jectory and an integral fluctuation theorem, Phys

    U. Seifert, Entropy production along a stochastic tra- jectory and an integral fluctuation theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 040602 (2005)

    2005

  37. [45]

    Shiraishi, K

    N. Shiraishi, K. Funo, and K. Saito, Speed limit for clas- sical stochastic processes, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 070601 (2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    Hasegawa, Quantum thermodynamic uncertainty re- lation for continuous measurement, Phys

    Y. Hasegawa, Quantum thermodynamic uncertainty re- lation for continuous measurement, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 050601 (2020)

    2020

  39. [47]

    Hasegawa, Unifying speed limit, thermodynamic un- certainty relation and Heisenberg principle via bulk- boundary correspondence, Nat

    Y. Hasegawa, Unifying speed limit, thermodynamic un- certainty relation and Heisenberg principle via bulk- boundary correspondence, Nat. Commun.14, 2828 (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    Panuccio, M

    A. Panuccio, M. Bicego, and V. Murino, A hidden markov model-based approach to sequential data cluster- ing, inStruct., Syntactic, Stat. Pattern Recognit., edited by T. Caelli, A. Amin, R. P. W. Duin, D. de Ridder, and M. Kamel (2002) pp. 734–743

    2002

  41. [49]

    Stella and Y

    F. Stella and Y. Amer, Continuous time Bayesian net- work classifiers, J. Biomed. Inform.45, 1108 (2012)

    2012

  42. [50]

    Spaeh and C

    F. Spaeh and C. E. Tsourakakis, Markovletics: Meth- ods and a novel application for learning continuous-time Markov chain mixtures, inProc. ACM Web Conf. 2024 (2024) pp. 4160–4171. 15

    2024

  43. [51]

    Pagare and Z

    A. Pagare and Z. Lu, Mpemba-like sensory withdrawal effect, PRX Life2, 043019 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    R. G. Endres and N. S. Wingreen, Maximum likelihood and the single receptor, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 158101 (2009)

    2009

  45. [53]

    Mora and N

    T. Mora and N. S. Wingreen, Limits of sensing temporal concentration changes by single cells, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 248101 (2010)

    2010

  46. [54]

    Mandelstam and I

    L. Mandelstam and I. Tamm, The uncertainty relation between energy and time in non-relativistic quantum me- chanics, J. Phys. USSR9, 249 (1945)

    1945

  47. [55]

    Jarzynski, Equalities and inequalities: Irreversibility and the second law of thermodynamics at the nanoscale, Annu

    C. Jarzynski, Equalities and inequalities: Irreversibility and the second law of thermodynamics at the nanoscale, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.2, 329 (2011)

    2011

  48. [56]

    Rold´ an, I

    E. Rold´ an, I. Neri, M. D¨ orpinghaus, H. Meyr, and F. J¨ ulicher, Decision making in the arrow of time, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 250602 (2015)

    2015

  49. [57]

    A. Seif, M. Hafezi, and C. Jarzynski, Machine learning the thermodynamic arrow of time, Nat. Phys.17, 105 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    Devroye, L

    L. Devroye, L. Gy¨ orfi, and G. Lugosi,A Probabilistic Theory of Pattern Recognition, 1st ed., Stochastic Mod- elling and Applied Probability, Vol. 31 (New York, NY, 1996)

    1996

  51. [59]

    Nielsen, Generalized Bhattacharyya and Chernoff up- per bounds on Bayes error using quasi-arithmetic means, Pattern Recognit

    F. Nielsen, Generalized Bhattacharyya and Chernoff up- per bounds on Bayes error using quasi-arithmetic means, Pattern Recognit. Lett.42, 25 (2014)

    2014

  52. [60]

    LeCam, Convergence of estimates under dimensional- ity restrictions, Ann

    L. LeCam, Convergence of estimates under dimensional- ity restrictions, Ann. Stat.1, 38 (1973)

    1973

  53. [61]

    Sason and S

    I. Sason and S. Verd´ u,f-divergence inequalities, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory62, 5973 (2016)

    2016

  54. [62]

    W. K. Wootters, Statistical distance and Hilbert space, Phys. Rev. D23, 357 (1981)

    1981

  55. [63]

    Ito, Stochastic thermodynamic interpretation of infor- mation geometry, Phys

    S. Ito, Stochastic thermodynamic interpretation of infor- mation geometry, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 030605 (2018)

    2018

  56. [64]

    S. B. Nicholson, L. P. Garcia-Pintos, A. del Campo, and J. R. Green, Time-information uncertainty relations in thermodynamics, Nat. Phys.16, 1211 (2020)

    2020

  57. [65]

    Nishiyama and Y

    T. Nishiyama and Y. Hasegawa, Unified speed limits in classical and quantum dynamics via temporal Fisher in- formation, Phys. Rev. E (2026), in press

    2026

  58. [66]

    Hasegawa and T

    Y. Hasegawa and T. Nishiyama, Thermodynamic con- centration inequalities and trade-off relations, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 247101 (2024)

    2024

  59. [67]

    Pedregosa, G

    F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cour- napeau, M. Brucher, M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay, Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python, J. Mach. Learn. Res.12, 2...

    2011

  60. [68]

    M. S. Pinsker,Information and Information Stability of Random Variables and Processes(Holden-Day, San Fran- cisco, 1964) translated from the Russian edition pub- lished in 1960 by the Academy of Sciences, Moscow

    1964

Pith tools

Reviewed June 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.