pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.24439 · v1 · pith:PPX6E3GCnew · submitted 2026-05-23 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Emergence of Triplet Superconductivity from Cavity Vacuum Fluctuations

Xin-Xin Yang , Shuai Zhang , Kun Ding , Xiaopeng Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 12:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
keywords triplet superconductivitycavity vacuum fluctuationslight-matter couplingsinglet-triplet transitionFermi surface renormalizationunconventional superconductivityquantum materials engineering
0
0 comments X

The pith

Cavity vacuum fluctuations switch a superconductor from singlet to triplet pairing above a critical coupling.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that cavity vacuum fluctuations alone can induce triplet superconductivity in a material that would otherwise only support singlet pairing. The fluctuations renormalize the electronic band structure in a polarization-dependent way, which reshapes the Fermi surface and shifts the competition between allowed pairing symmetries. Above a threshold light-matter coupling strength, triplet pairing becomes the leading instability and produces a superconducting state absent without the cavity. A reader would care because the result points to a route for creating unconventional superconductors using only the vacuum environment of a cavity.

Core claim

Cavity vacuum fluctuations renormalize the electronic band structure in a polarization-dependent manner, reshaping the Fermi surface and altering the competition among symmetry-allowed pairing channels. Above a critical light-matter coupling, the leading instability switches from singlet to triplet pairing, yielding a superconducting state absent in the bare material. This vacuum-induced symmetry transition produces distinct modifications of the gap structure and low-energy quasiparticle spectrum.

What carries the argument

Polarization-dependent renormalization of the band structure by cavity vacuum fluctuations, which alters the Fermi surface and favors triplet pairing over singlet.

If this is right

  • Multiple superconducting phases arise from the cavity vacuum fluctuations.
  • The gap structure and low-energy quasiparticle spectrum acquire distinct modifications.
  • Triplet states of potential relevance for topological superconductivity become accessible.
  • A vacuum-induced symmetry transition occurs between singlet and triplet regimes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same vacuum-renormalization mechanism could be tested in other materials where singlet and triplet channels compete closely.
  • Varying cavity geometry or polarization direction offers an experimental knob to tune the transition point without changing the sample chemistry.
  • The approach may extend to stabilizing other unconventional orders if the polarization dependence can be engineered to favor different symmetries.
  • A concrete test would be to embed a known singlet superconductor in a high-Q cavity and track the pairing symmetry via tunneling or transport as coupling strength is increased.

Load-bearing premise

The cavity vacuum field couples to the electrons solely through polarization-dependent band renormalization without introducing decoherence, dissipation, or higher-order photon processes.

What would settle it

Measurement showing that triplet pairing never becomes dominant even as light-matter coupling is increased well beyond the predicted critical value, or direct detection of decoherence that suppresses the transition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.24439 by Kun Ding, Shuai Zhang, Xiaopeng Li, Xin-Xin Yang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Schematic of cavity-controlled switching from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Dispersion ξν(k) at zero temperature along the high-symmetry path for a cavity polarized along ex, compar￾ing the cavity-free case (solid) with g 2 eff = 0.05 (dashed) and g 2 eff = 0.2 (dotted). (b) Dispersion ξν(k) for cavities polarized along ey (green) and e13 = (1, 1)/ √ 2 (red) at g 2 eff = 0.07. (c) and (d) Corresponding FS contours for panels (a) and (b), respectively. the flattening along Y → … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Superconducting transition temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Engineering quantum materials with cavity fields has emerged as a powerful route to manipulate phases of quantum matter in solids. Here we demonstrate that cavity vacuum fluctuations alone can drive the emergence of triplet superconductivity in an otherwise singlet superconductor. The vacuum field renormalizes the electronic band structure in a polarization dependent manner, reshaping the Fermi surface and altering the competition among symmetry allowed pairing channels. As a result, multiple superconducting phases arise from the cavity vacuum fluctuations. Above a critical light matter coupling, the leading instability switches from singlet to triplet pairing, yielding a superconducting state absent in the bare material. This vacuum induced symmetry transition produces distinct modifications of the gap structure and low energy quasiparticle spectrum. Our results establish cavity vacuum engineering as a mechanism for generating unconventional superconducting phases and stabilizing triplet states of potential relevance for topological superconductivity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that cavity vacuum fluctuations alone can drive the emergence of triplet superconductivity in an otherwise singlet superconductor. The vacuum field is said to renormalize the electronic band structure in a polarization-dependent manner, reshaping the Fermi surface and altering the competition among symmetry-allowed pairing channels. Above a critical light-matter coupling, the leading instability switches from singlet to triplet pairing, producing a superconducting state absent in the bare material, with distinct modifications to the gap structure and low-energy quasiparticle spectrum.

Significance. If the central result holds, the work would establish cavity vacuum engineering as a mechanism for generating unconventional superconducting phases and stabilizing triplet states of potential relevance for topological superconductivity. The approach of using vacuum-induced band reshaping to invert pairing-channel dominance without external fields or doping would be a notable addition to cavity QED control of quantum materials.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Model] The load-bearing assumption is that the cavity vacuum couples to electrons solely through polarization-dependent renormalization of the single-particle dispersion while leaving the bare pairing kernel unchanged. This decoupling is stated in the abstract but is not derived from a microscopic light-matter Hamiltonian; the virtual exchange of cavity photons would generically generate an additional retarded interaction whose symmetry content must be shown to be negligible compared with the band-renormalization effect.
  2. [Results] The reported switch in leading instability from singlet to triplet is asserted to arise from Fermi-surface reshaping alone. Without an explicit calculation of the pairing eigenvalues (e.g., the eigenvalue spectrum of the linearized gap equation before and after renormalization) or a demonstration that the interaction kernel V(k,k') remains fixed, it is unclear whether the claimed inversion survives once the full photon-mediated contribution is included.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the light-matter coupling strength and the polarization vectors should be defined consistently between the abstract and the main text.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'multiple superconducting phases' arising from the vacuum fluctuations; a brief statement of which additional phases appear (beyond the singlet-triplet switch) would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments. We address the major points below and indicate the revisions that will be incorporated.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Model] The load-bearing assumption is that the cavity vacuum couples to electrons solely through polarization-dependent renormalization of the single-particle dispersion while leaving the bare pairing kernel unchanged. This decoupling is stated in the abstract but is not derived from a microscopic light-matter Hamiltonian; the virtual exchange of cavity photons would generically generate an additional retarded interaction whose symmetry content must be shown to be negligible compared with the band-renormalization effect.

    Authors: We agree that a microscopic derivation is necessary to justify the decoupling. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated section deriving the effective Hamiltonian from the full light-matter model (including both paramagnetic and diamagnetic terms) and explicitly estimate the strength of the virtual-photon-mediated retarded interaction. We will show that, in the vacuum-fluctuation regime and for the light-matter couplings considered, this contribution remains subdominant and does not alter the symmetry classification of the dominant pairing channels relative to the band-renormalization effect. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] The reported switch in leading instability from singlet to triplet is asserted to arise from Fermi-surface reshaping alone. Without an explicit calculation of the pairing eigenvalues (e.g., the eigenvalue spectrum of the linearized gap equation before and after renormalization) or a demonstration that the interaction kernel V(k,k') remains fixed, it is unclear whether the claimed inversion survives once the full photon-mediated contribution is included.

    Authors: The calculations in the manuscript were performed with the linearized gap equation using the cavity-renormalized dispersion while keeping V(k,k') fixed. In the revision we will include explicit plots of the leading eigenvalues (both singlet and triplet channels) as functions of the light-matter coupling strength, before and after renormalization, to demonstrate the crossing. We will also state clearly that V(k,k') is held fixed within the present scope, which isolates the band-renormalization mechanism; a quantitative treatment of the additional photon-mediated terms is left for future work but is not expected to reverse the qualitative inversion on symmetry grounds. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; band renormalization treated as input to standard pairing eigenvalue problem.

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by taking a light-matter Hamiltonian that produces a polarization-dependent renormalization of the single-particle dispersion, then solving the linearized gap equation for singlet versus triplet channels with an unchanged bare interaction kernel. This is a conventional computational workflow whose output (switch in leading instability) is not identical to the input by construction, nor obtained via fitted parameters renamed as predictions, nor justified solely by self-citation chains. No equations are shown to reduce to each other tautologically, and the central claim retains independent content from the explicit diagonalization step. The modeling choice to omit photon-mediated pairing corrections is an assumption about the Hamiltonian, not a circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields an incomplete ledger; the central claim rests on an unspecified microscopic light-matter Hamiltonian whose parameters are not listed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5669 in / 1030 out tokens · 20931 ms · 2026-06-30T12:36:38.214766+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    I.-T. Lu, D. Shin, M. Kamper Svendsen, S. Latini, H. H¨ ubener, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, Cavity En- gineering of Solid-State Materials without External Driv- ing, Adv. Opt. Photon.17, 441 (2025)

    2025

  2. [2]

    F. J. Garcia-Vidal, C. Ciuti, and T. W. Ebbesen, Ma- nipulating Matter by Strong Coupling to Vacuum Fields, Science373, eabd0336 (2021)

    2021

  3. [3]

    Bloch, A

    J. Bloch, A. Cavalleri, V. Galitski, M. Hafezi, and A. Ru- bio, Strongly Correlated Electron-Photon Systems, Na- ture606, 41 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    Schlawin, D

    F. Schlawin, D. M. Kennes, and M. A. Sentef, Cavity Quantum Materials, Appl. Phys. Rev.9, 011312 (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    H. M. Bretscheret al., Fluctuation Engineering in Cavity Quantum Materials, arXiv:2604.08666v1 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  6. [6]

    Baydin, H

    A. Baydin, H. Zhu, M. Bamba, K. R. A. Hazzard, and J. Kono, Perspective on Quantum Vacuum in Matter, Opt. Mater. Express15, 1833 (2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    X. Li, M. Bamba, Q. Zhang, S. Fallahi, G. C. Gard- ner, W. Gao, M. Lou, K. Yoshioka, M. J. Manfra, and J. Kono, Vacuum Bloch-Siegert Shift in Landau Polari- tons with Ultra-High Cooperativity, Nat. Photonics12, 324 (2018)

    2018

  8. [8]

    G. L. Paravicini-Baglianiet al., Magneto-Transport Con- trolled by Landau Polariton States, Nat. Phys.15, 186 (2019)

    2019

  9. [9]

    Enkneret al., Testing the Renormalization of the von Klitzing Constant by Cavity Vacuum Fields, Phys

    J. Enkneret al., Testing the Renormalization of the von Klitzing Constant by Cavity Vacuum Fields, Phys. Rev. X14, 021038 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    Enkneret al., Tunable Vacuum-Field Control of Frac- tional and Integer Quantum Hall Phases, Nature641, 884 (2025)

    J. Enkneret al., Tunable Vacuum-Field Control of Frac- tional and Integer Quantum Hall Phases, Nature641, 884 (2025)

    2025

  11. [11]

    Appugliese, J

    F. Appugliese, J. Enkner, G. L. Paravicini-Bagliani, M. Beck, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, G. Scalari, C. Ciuti, and J. Faist, Breakdown of Topological Protection by Cavity Vacuum Fields in the Integer Quantum Hall Ef- fect, Science375, 1030 (2022)

    2022

  12. [12]

    Xue, H.-C

    H. Xueet al., Observation of Cavity-Mediated Nonlinear Landau Fan and Modified Landau Level Degeneracy in Graphene Quantum Transport, arXiv:2506.21409 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    X. Wang, E. Ronca, and M. A. Sentef, Cavity Quan- tum Electrodynamical Chern Insulator: Towards Light- Induced Quantized Anomalous Hall Effect in Graphene, Phys. Rev. B99, 235156 (2019)

    2019

  14. [14]

    Jiang, M

    C. Jiang, M. Baggioli, and Q.-D. Jiang, Engineering Flat Bands in Twisted-Bilayer Graphene away from the Magic Angle with Chiral Optical Cavities, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 6 166901 (2024)

    2024

  15. [15]

    H. Liu, F. Troisi, H. H¨ ubener, S. Latini, and A. Rubio, Cavity-Mediated Electron-Electron Interactions: Renor- malizing Dirac States in Graphene, Sci. Adv.11, eadz1855 (2025)

    2025

  16. [16]

    Z. Lin, C. Xiao, D.-P. Nguyen, G. Arwas, C. Ciuti, and W. Yao, Remote Gate Control of Topological Transitions in Moir´ e Superlattices via Cavity Vacuum Fields, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.121, e2306584120 (2024)

    2024

  17. [17]

    Nguyen, G

    D.-P. Nguyen, G. Arwas, Z. Lin, W. Yao, and C. Ciuti, Electron-Photon Chern Number in Cavity-Embedded 2D Moir´ e Materials, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 176602 (2023)

    2023

  18. [18]

    C. B. Dag and V. Rokaj, Engineering Topology in Graphene with Chiral Cavities, Phys. Rev. B110, L121101 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    Latini, D

    S. Latini, D. Shin, S.-A. Sato, C. Sch¨ afer, U. De Giovan- nini, H. H¨ ubener, and A. Rubio, The Ferroelectric Photo Ground State of SrTiO 3 from Cavity Materials Engi- neering, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.118, e2105618118 (2021)

    2021

  20. [20]

    Ashida, A

    Y. Ashida, A. ˙Imamo˘ glu, J. Faist, D. Jaksch, A. Caval- leri, and E. Demler, Quantum Electrodynamic Control of Matter: Cavity-Enhanced Ferroelectric Phase Transi- tion, Phys. Rev. X10, 041027 (2020)

    2020

  21. [21]

    J. B. Curtis, M. H. Michael, and E. Demler, Local Fluc- tuations in Cavity Control of Ferroelectricity, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 043118 (2023)

    2023

  22. [22]

    Jarcet al., Cavity-Mediated Thermal Control of Metal-to-Insulator Transition in 1T-TaS 2, Nature622, 487 (2023)

    G. Jarcet al., Cavity-Mediated Thermal Control of Metal-to-Insulator Transition in 1T-TaS 2, Nature622, 487 (2023)

    2023

  23. [23]

    Masuki and Y

    K. Masuki and Y. Ashida, Cavity Moir´ e Materials: Controlling Magnetic Frustration with Quantum Light- Matter Interaction, Phys. Rev. B109, 195173 (2024)

    2024

  24. [24]

    Chiocchetta, D

    A. Chiocchetta, D. Kiese, C. P. Zelle, F. Piazza, and S. Diehl, Cavity-Induced Quantum Spin Liquids, Nat. Commun.12, 5901 (2021)

    2021

  25. [25]

    F. Tay, S. Sanders, A. Baydin, Z. Song, D. M. Welakuh, A. Alabastri, V. Rokaj, C. B. Dag, and J. Kono , Tera- hertz Chiral Photonic-Crystal Cavities for Dirac Gap En- gineering in Graphene, Nat. Commun.16, 5270 (2025)

    2025

  26. [26]

    Riolo, A

    R. Riolo, A. Tomadin, G. Mazza, R. Asgari, A. H. Mac- Donald, and M. Polini, Tuning Fermi Liquids with Po- laritonic Cavities, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.122 e2407995122 (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    Thomas, E

    A. Thomas, E. Devaux, K. Nagarajan, G. Rogez, M. Sei- del, F. Richard, C. Genet, M. Drillon, and T. W. Ebbe- sen, Large Enhancement of Ferromagnetism under a Col- lective Strong Coupling of YBCO Nanoparticles, Nano Lett.21, 4365 (2021)

    2021

  28. [28]

    Thomaset al., Exploring Superconductivity un- der Strong Coupling with the Vacuum Electromagnetic Field, J

    A. Thomaset al., Exploring Superconductivity un- der Strong Coupling with the Vacuum Electromagnetic Field, J. Chem. Phys.162, 134701 (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    Keren, T

    I. Keren, T. A. Webb, S. Zhang,et al., Cavity-Altered Superconductivity, Nature650, 864 (2026)

    2026

  30. [30]

    Rokaj, M

    V. Rokaj, M. Ruggenthaler, F. G. Eich, and A. Rubio, Free Electron Gas in Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 013012 (2022)

    2022

  31. [31]

    J. Li, L. Schamriß, and M. Eckstein, Effective Theory of Lattice Electrons Strongly Coupled to Quantum Electro- magnetic Fields, Phys. Rev. B105, 165121 (2022)

    2022

  32. [32]

    M. A. Sentef, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, Cav- ity Quantum-Electrodynamical Polaritonically Enhanced Electron-Phonon Coupling and Its Influence on Super- conductivity, Sci. Adv.4, eaau6969 (2018)

    2018

  33. [33]

    Hagenm¨ uller, J

    D. Hagenm¨ uller, J. Schachenmayer, C. Genet, T. W. Ebbesen, and G. Pupillo, Enhancement of the Electron-Phonon Scattering Induced by Intrinsic Surface Plasmon-Phonon Polaritons, ACS Photonics6, 1073 (2019)

    2019

  34. [34]

    Schlawin, A

    F. Schlawin, A. Cavalleri, and D. Jaksch, Cavity- Mediated Electron-Photon Superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 133602 (2019)

    2019

  35. [35]

    G. M. Andolina, A. De Pasquale, F. M. D. Pellegrino, I. Torre, F. H. L. Koppens, and M. Polini, Amperean Superconductivity Cannot Be Induced by Deep Subwave- length Cavities in a Two-Dimensional Material, Phys. Rev. B109, 104513 (2024)

    2024

  36. [36]

    I.-T. Lu, D. Shin, M. K. Svendsen, H. H¨ ubener, U. De Giovannini, S. Latini, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Ru- bio, Cavity-Enhanced Superconductivity in MgB 2 from First-Principles Quantum Electrodynamics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.121, e2415061121 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    V. K. Kozin, E. Thingstad, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Cavity-Enhanced Superconductivity via Band Engineer- ing, Phys. Rev. B111, 035410 (2025)

    2025

  38. [38]

    Sigrist and K

    M. Sigrist and K. Ueda, Phenomenological Theory of Un- conventional Superconductivity, Rev. Mod. Phys.63, 239 (1991)

    1991

  39. [39]

    Sato and Y

    M. Sato and Y. Ando, Topological Superconductors: A Review, Rep. Prog. Phys.80, 076501 (2017)

    2017

  40. [40]

    A. M. Clogston, Upper Limit for the Critical Field in Hard Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.9, 266 (1962)

    1962

  41. [41]

    B. S. Chandrasekhar, A Note on the Maximum Critical Field of High-Field Superconductors, Appl. Phys. Lett. 1, 7 (1962)

    1962

  42. [42]

    N. F. Berk and J. R. Schrieffer, Effect of Ferromagnetic Spin Correlations on Superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 433 (1966)

    1966

  43. [43]

    Fay and J

    D. Fay and J. Appel, Coexistence of p-State Supercon- ductivity and Itinerant Ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. B 22, 3173 (1980)

    1980

  44. [44]

    C. W. Hickset al., Strong Increase ofT c of Sr 2RuO4 under Both Tensile and Compressive Strain, Science344, 283 (2014)

    2014

  45. [45]

    F. S. Bergeret, A. F. Volkov, and K. B. Efetov, Odd Triplet Superconductivity and Related Phenomena in Superconductor-Ferromagnet Structures, Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 1321 (2005)

    2005

  46. [46]

    Linder and J

    J. Linder and J. W. A. Robinson, Superconducting Spin- tronics, Nat. Phys.11, 307 (2015)

    2015

  47. [47]

    Mandal, N

    M. Mandal, N. C. Drucker, P. Siriviboon, T. Nguyen, A. Boonkird, T. N. Lamichhane, R. Okabe, A. Chotrat- tanapituk, and M. Li, Topological Superconductors from a Materials Perspective, Chem. Mater.35, 6184 (2023)

    2023

  48. [48]

    Kino and H

    H. Kino and H. Fukuyama, Phase Diagram of Two- Dimensional Organic Conductors: (BEDT-TTF) 2X, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.65, 2158 (1996)

    1996

  49. [49]

    Watanabe, H

    H. Watanabe, H. Seo, and S. Yunoki, Phase Com- petition and Superconductivity inκ-(BEDT-TTF) 2X: Importance of Intermolecular Coulomb Interactions, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.86, 033703 (2017)

    2017

  50. [50]

    H. Seo, C. Hotta, and H. Fukuyama, Toward System- atic Understanding of Diversity of Electronic Properties in Low-Dimensional Molecular Solids, Chem. Rev.104, 5005 (2004)

    2004

  51. [51]

    A. U. B. Wolter, R. Feyerherm, E. Dudzik, S. S¨ ullow, C. Strack, M. Lang, and D. Schweitzer, Determin- 7 ing Ethylene Group Disorder Levels inκ-(BEDT- TTF)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br, Phys. Rev. B75, 104512 (2007)

    2007

  52. [52]

    C. Stracket al., Resistivity Studies under Hydrostatic Pressure on a Low-Resistance Variant of the Quasi- Two-Dimensional Organic Superconductorκ-(BEDT- TTF)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br: Search for Intrinsic Scattering Contributions, Phys. Rev. B72, 054511 (2005)

    2005

  53. [53]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, M. Naka, H. Seo, Y. Mo- tome, and H. Kusunose, Multipole Description of Emer- gent Spin-Orbit Interaction in Organic Antiferromag- netκ-(BEDT-TTF) 2Cu[N(CN)2]Cl, JPS Conf. Proc.30, 011149 (2020)

    2020

  54. [54]

    Platt, W

    C. Platt, W. Hanke, and R. Thomale, Functional Renor- malization Group for Multi-Orbital Fermi Surface Insta- bilities, Adv. Phys.62, 453 (2013)

    2013

  55. [55]

    See the Supplemental Material for the derivation of the effective Hamiltonian, details of the symmetry analysis, the explicit forms of the basis functions, and the projec- tion of the basis functions onto the band spectrum

  56. [56]

    B. J. Powell and R. H. McKenzie, Strong Electronic Cor- relations in Superconducting Organic Charge Transfer Salts, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter18, R827 (2006)

    2006

  57. [57]

    D. J. Scalapino, A Common Thread: The Pairing Inter- action for Unconventional Superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 1383 (2012)

    2012

  58. [58]

    Seo, Charge ordering in organic ET compounds, J

    H. Seo, Charge ordering in organic ET compounds, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.69, 805 (2000)

    2000

  59. [59]

    Watanabe, H

    H. Watanabe, H. Seo, and S. Yunoki, Mechanism of Superconductivity and Electron-Hole Doping Asymme- try inκ-Type Molecular Conductors, Nat. Commun.10, 3167 (2019)

    2019

  60. [60]

    Guterding, M

    D. Guterding, M. Altmeyer, H. O. Jeschke, and R. Va- lent´ ı, Near-Degeneracy of Extendeds+d x2−y2 andd xy Order Parameters in Quasi-Two-Dimensional Organic Superconductors, Phys. Rev. B94, 024515 (2016)

    2016

  61. [61]

    Mizukamiet al., Direct Observation of a Su- perconducting Electronic Structure ofκ-(BEDT- TTF)2Cu(NCS)2 by Photoemission Spectroscopy Using a 6-eV Laser, J

    K. Mizukamiet al., Direct Observation of a Su- perconducting Electronic Structure ofκ-(BEDT- TTF)2Cu(NCS)2 by Photoemission Spectroscopy Using a 6-eV Laser, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.94, 073701 (2025)

    2025

  62. [62]

    Malone, O

    L. Malone, O. J. Taylor, J. A. Schlueter, and A. Carring- ton, Location of Gap Nodes in the Organic Supercon- ductorsκ-(ET) 2Cu(NCS)2 andκ-(ET) 2Cu[N(CN)2]Br Determined by Magnetocalorimetry, Phys. Rev. B82, 014522 (2010)

    2010

  63. [63]

    Matsuda, K

    Y. Matsuda, K. Izawa, and I. Vekhter, Nodal Structure of Unconventional Superconductors Probed by Angle Re- solved Thermal Transport Measurements, J. Phys.: Con- dens. Matter18, R705(2006)

    2006

  64. [64]

    Z. Sun, M. M. Fogler, D. N. Basov, and A. J. Mills, Collective Modes and Terahertz Near-Field Response of Superconductors Phys. Rev. Research2, 023413(2020)

    2020

  65. [65]

    Buzziet al., Photomolecular High-Temperature Su- perconductivity, Phys

    M. Buzziet al., Photomolecular High-Temperature Su- perconductivity, Phys. Rev. X10, 031028 (2020)

    2020

  66. [66]

    H. H. Sheinfuxet al., High-quality Nanocavities through Multimodal Confinement of Hyperbolic Polaritons in Hexagonal Boron Nitride, Nat. Mater.23, 499 (2024)

    2024

  67. [67]

    Erkenov, S

    S. Erkenov, S. Fust, S. Oberbauer, W. Biberacher, N. D. Kushch, H. M¨ uller, F. L. Pratt, R. Gross, and M. V. Kartsovnik, Electronic Correlations and Spin Frustration in the Molecular Conductorsκ-(BEDT- TTF)2X Probed by Magnetic Quantum Oscillations, Phys. Rev. B110, 205149 (2024)

    2024

  68. [68]

    H. C. Kandpal, I. Opahle, Y.-Z. Zhang, H. O. Jeschke, and R. Valent´ ı, Revision of Model Parameters forκ-Type Charge Transfer Salts: An Ab Initio Study, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 067004 (2009)

    2009

  69. [69]

    Yonemitsu, High-Frequency Analysis of Effective Interactions and Bandwidth for Transient States af- ter Monocycle Pulse Excitation of Extended Hubbard Model, J

    K. Yonemitsu, High-Frequency Analysis of Effective Interactions and Bandwidth for Transient States af- ter Monocycle Pulse Excitation of Extended Hubbard Model, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.86, 064702 (2017)

    2017

  70. [70]

    Lin, H.-C

    Z. Lin, H.-C. Chan, W. Yang, Y. Sha, C. Xiao, S. Zhang, and W. Yao, Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking of Cav- ity Vacuum and Emergent Gyrotropic Effects in Embed- ded Moir´ e Superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 046903 (2026)

    2026

  71. [71]

    Koretsune, and C

    T. Koretsune, and C. Hotta, Evaluating model parame- ters of theκ- andβ ′-type Mott insulating organic solids, Phys. Rev. B89, 045102 (2014). 8 End Matter Appendix A: Details of the Model In the absence of the cavity, electron motion is de- scribed by nearest-neighbor hoppingst ij on the four dis- tinct bonds (b 1, b2, p, q) of theκ-type geometry [48, 49]...

    2014