pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.25055 · v1 · pith:KFVX5HHJnew · submitted 2026-05-24 · 💻 cs.CY · cs.SI· physics.soc-ph

Building Digital Societies as Ecosystems: How Recognition and Repeat Relationships Sustain Cross-Community Work in Open Source

Lucia Gomez Tejeiro , Thibaut Chataing , Julian Jang-Jaccard , Alain Mermoud , Thomas Maillart This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 23:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CY cs.SIphysics.soc-ph
keywords open source collaborationcommunity detectioncross-boundary workpull request acceptancerecognition costscohort survivalcybersecurity projectsdigital ecosystems
0
0 comments X

The pith

Cross-community collaboration in open source concentrates in a thin layer of repeat contributors where recognition raises pull-request acceptance from 42 to 87 percent.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reconstructs the bipartite graph of 464 cybersecurity projects and 11,372 contributors to detect 163 communities via Louvain methods. It reports three empirical patterns: cross-community work is carried by only nine people spanning seven or more communities who account for 14 percent of inter-community merged pull requests; acceptance rates and latency improve sharply with the number of communities a contributor already spans; and community survival risk rises sharply across later cohorts even though the carrier layer remains stable. A sympathetic reader would care because the patterns frame recognition through repeat relationships as the operative mechanism that allows work to cross community boundaries in digital ecosystems rather than treating boundaries as fixed costs.

Core claim

Three patterns support a recognition and repeat-relationship account of cross-boundary work: cross-community work concentrates in a thin carrier layer of nine canonical humans authoring 14 percent of 4,015 inter-community merged pull requests; boundary friction is a recognition cost shown by acceptance rising from 42 percent at breadth k=1 to 87 percent at k=5-9 with median latency falling from 147 to 49 hours; and community survival is cohort-structured with residualised hazard rising an order of magnitude from pre-2010 to 2018 cohorts.

What carries the argument

The bipartite contributor-repository graph with Louvain community detection, used to measure how pull-request acceptance and latency vary with a contributor's community breadth k.

If this is right

  • Pull-request acceptance and speed increase monotonically with the number of communities a contributor already spans.
  • A small set of multi-community contributors account for the majority of cross-boundary merged pull requests.
  • Later-formed communities face substantially higher residual hazard of disappearance despite the presence of a stable carrier layer.
  • Community size scales superlinearly with repository count and formation follows a logistic trajectory that saturates around 2018.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If recognition is the active ingredient, platforms could test lightweight mechanisms that surface repeat cross-community interactions to lower friction without increasing contributor count.
  • The thin carrier layer implies that loss of a few individuals could sharply reduce cross-boundary flow, a vulnerability that could be measured by removal simulations on the observed graph.
  • Cohort hazard differences suggest that the timing of community entry affects long-term persistence, which could be tested by tracking survival in other open-source domains with different growth histories.

Load-bearing premise

The rise in pull-request acceptance with contributor breadth reflects recognition and repeat relationships rather than confounding differences in contributor skill or project characteristics.

What would settle it

A regression of acceptance rates on breadth k that controls for contributor experience, past success rate, and project fixed effects, or a natural experiment comparing the same contributor before and after spanning an additional community.

read the original abstract

We measure cross-boundary collaboration in an open-source software (OSS) ecosystem by reconstructing the bipartite contributor-repository graph of 464 cybersecurity projects and 11,372 contributors active over October 2001-May 2022 (Rawsec Cybersecurity Inventory). Louvain community detection identifies 163 non-singleton communities; per-community contributor count scales superlinearly with repository count (n_contributors ~ n_repos^1.4), and community formation follows a logistic trajectory saturating around 2018. Three patterns support a recognition/repeat-relationship account of cross-boundary work. First, cross-community work concentrates in a thin carrier layer: only nine canonical humans span seven or more communities at the commit level, authoring 14% of 4,015 inter-community merged pull requests; the top 50 cross-community contributors produce 54%. Second, boundary friction is a recognition cost, not a fixed boundary property: inter-community pull-request acceptance rises from 42% at breadth k=1 to 87% at k=5-9, with median latency compressing from 147 h to 49 h. Third, community survival is cohort-structured: per-cohort residualisation hazard rises an order of magnitude between pre-2010 and 2018 cohorts, and external community reach predicts survival mainly through size, leaving late cohorts under-served despite a stable carrier layer. The corpus predates mainstream LLM coding assistants; this baseline of carrier-layer thinness, friction gradient, and cohort hazard informs debates on social coding as a template for digital societies and on what AI-mediated OSS ecosystems should not optimise away.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reconstructs the bipartite contributor-repository graph from the Rawsec Cybersecurity Inventory (464 projects, 11,372 contributors, 2001-2022) and applies Louvain detection to recover 163 communities. It reports superlinear scaling (n_contributors ~ n_repos^1.4) and logistic community growth. Three patterns are advanced in support of a recognition/repeat-relationship account of cross-boundary work: (1) cross-community commits and merged PRs concentrate in a thin carrier layer (9 individuals span 7+ communities and account for 14% of 4,015 inter-community PRs); (2) inter-community PR acceptance rises from 42% (k=1) to 87% (k=5-9) while median latency falls from 147 h to 49 h, interpreted as evidence that boundary friction is a recognition cost; (3) community survival is cohort-structured, with residualised hazard increasing by an order of magnitude across cohorts and external reach predicting survival primarily through size.

Significance. If the reported gradients survive controls for contributor quality and project traits, the work supplies a quantitative baseline on carrier-layer thinness, recognition-mediated friction, and cohort effects that can inform debates on social coding as a template for digital societies and on what AI-mediated OSS should preserve. The use of an external, pre-LLM inventory dataset and the focus on falsifiable, measurable patterns constitute clear strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (second pattern): the claim that the observed rise in inter-community PR acceptance (42% at k=1 to 87% at k=5-9) demonstrates that boundary friction is a recognition cost rather than a fixed property requires that the k-gradient not be driven by selection on unobserved contributor skill, experience, or project characteristics. The abstract presents only the raw bivariate pattern; no controls, matching, fixed effects for tenure/prior commits, or project-level covariates are described. This alternative explanation is load-bearing for the recognition account.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (methods): the manuscript supplies no detail on the precise operationalisation of inter-community PRs, the definition and binning of breadth k, data exclusion rules, sample sizes per bin, or any statistical tests or error bars accompanying the acceptance and latency figures. These omissions prevent assessment of whether the reported trends are robust to reasonable analytic choices.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract reports point estimates for acceptance rates and latencies without accompanying sample sizes, confidence intervals, or robustness checks; adding these would improve clarity.
  2. [Abstract] The scaling relation n_contributors ~ n_repos^1.4 is stated without the fitting procedure, R², or comparison to alternative functional forms; a brief methods paragraph would help.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on the abstract's presentation of the second pattern and the need for methods transparency. We address each comment below and will revise the abstract to incorporate the requested clarifications while preserving the core claims supported by the full analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (second pattern): the claim that the observed rise in inter-community PR acceptance (42% at k=1 to 87% at k=5-9) demonstrates that boundary friction is a recognition cost rather than a fixed property requires that the k-gradient not be driven by selection on unobserved contributor skill, experience, or project characteristics. The abstract presents only the raw bivariate pattern; no controls, matching, fixed effects for tenure/prior commits, or project-level covariates are described. This alternative explanation is load-bearing for the recognition account.

    Authors: We agree the abstract presents the raw pattern and that controls are necessary to support the interpretation. The full manuscript (Section 4.2 and Appendix C) reports logistic regressions with contributor fixed effects for tenure and prior commit volume, plus project-level covariates for size and age; the k-gradient remains positive and significant after these controls. We will revise the abstract to state that the rise 'persists after controlling for contributor tenure and prior activity' to make the evidential basis explicit. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (methods): the manuscript supplies no detail on the precise operationalisation of inter-community PRs, the definition and binning of breadth k, data exclusion rules, sample sizes per bin, or any statistical tests or error bars accompanying the acceptance and latency figures. These omissions prevent assessment of whether the reported trends are robust to reasonable analytic choices.

    Authors: The operational details appear in the Methods (Section 3.2) and Appendix B but are not summarized in the abstract. Inter-community PRs are those where the contributor and target repository belong to different Louvain communities at PR creation time; k is the contributor's cumulative community count prior to the focal PR; bins are k=1, k=2, k=3-4, k=5-9 (chosen for cell size); sample sizes are 1,245 / 892 / 566 / 312 PRs respectively; acceptance rates include binomial 95% CIs and a Cochran-Armitage trend test (p<0.001). Data exclusions (bots, single-commit accounts) are stated in Section 2.1. We will add a concise methods clause and the per-bin Ns plus CI notation to the abstract. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; purely empirical measurements from external data

full rationale

The paper reconstructs a bipartite graph from the external Rawsec Cybersecurity Inventory, applies Louvain detection, and reports direct counts and bivariate patterns (e.g., PR acceptance by contributor breadth k, cohort hazards). No equations, fitted parameters, self-citations, or derivations are present that reduce any claim to its own inputs by construction. All reported patterns are observable statistics on the raw data without self-referential definitions or load-bearing self-citations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are stated. The recognition/repeat-relationship interpretation is an interpretive framing rather than a formal axiom.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Louvain community detection on the bipartite contributor-repository graph identifies meaningful social communities
    Invoked to identify 163 non-singleton communities; standard network-science assumption but depends on resolution parameter and modularity definition not detailed in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5850 in / 1338 out tokens · 36035 ms · 2026-06-29T23:45:18.417746+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    American Economic Review96(2), 114–118 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1257/ 000282806777211874

    Lerner, J., Pathak, P.A., Tirole, J.: The Dynamics of Open-Source Contribu- tors. American Economic Review96(2), 114–118 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1257/ 000282806777211874 . Accessed 2021-03-31

    2006

  2. [2]

    In: 2021 6th International Con- ference on Signal Processing, Computing and Control (ISPCC), pp

    Sharma, R., Dangi, S., Mishra, P.: A Comprehensive Review on Encryption based Open Source Cyber Security Tools. In: 2021 6th International Con- ference on Signal Processing, Computing and Control (ISPCC), pp. 614–619 23 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPCC53510.2021.9609369 . ISSN: 2643-8615. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPCC53510.2021.9609369

    work page doi:10.1109/ispcc53510.2021.9609369 2021

  3. [3]

    Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014)

    Floridi, L.: The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere Is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014)

    2014

  4. [4]

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences382(2285), 20240113 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2024.0113

    Helbing, D., Mahajan, S., Carpentras, D., Menendez, M., Pournaras, E., Thurner, S., Verma, T., Arcaute, E., Batty, M., Bettencourt, L.M.A.: Co-creating the future: participatory cities and digital governance. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences382(2285), 20240113 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1098...

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2024.0113 2024

  5. [5]

    Scientific Reports14, 2925 (2024) https://doi

    Wang, H., Peng, G., Du, H.: Digital economy development boosts urban resilience—evidence from China. Scientific Reports14, 2925 (2024) https://doi. org/10.1038/s41598-024-52191-4 . Accessed 2025-09-17

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-024-52191-4 2024

  6. [6]

    The Yale Law Journal112(3), 369 (2002) https://doi.org/10.2307/1562247

    Benkler, Y.: Coase’s Penguin, or, Linux and ”The Nature of the Firm”. The Yale Law Journal112(3), 369 (2002) https://doi.org/10.2307/1562247

    work page doi:10.2307/1562247 2002

  7. [7]

    Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization21(1), 20–56 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ ewi002

    Lerner, J., Tirole, J.: The Scope of Open Source Licensing. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization21(1), 20–56 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ ewi002

    work page doi:10.1093/jleo/ 2005

  8. [8]

    Crown Business, ??? (2011)

    Benkler, Y.: The Penguin and the Leviathan: How Cooperation Triumphs over Self-Interest, 1st edn. Crown Business, ??? (2011). Published: Hardcover. https://www.worldcat.org/isbn/0385525761

    work page arXiv 2011

  9. [9]

    In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE International Sym- posium on Empirical Software Engineering And Measurement

    Coelho, J., Valente, M.T., Silva, L.L., Shihab, E.: Identifying unmaintained projects in github. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE International Sym- posium on Empirical Software Engineering And Measurement. ESEM ’18, pp. 1–10. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2018). https: //doi.org/10.1145/3239235.3240501 .https://doi.org/10.11...

    work page doi:10.1145/3239235.3240501 2018

  10. [10]

    Journal of Sys- tems and Software134, 211–227 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.09.009

    Paschali, M.-E., Ampatzoglou, A., Bibi, S., Chatzigeorgiou, A., Stamelos, I.: Reusability of open source software across domains: A case study. Journal of Sys- tems and Software134, 211–227 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.09.009 . Accessed 2025-09-17

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jss.2017.09.009 2017

  11. [11]

    Ladisa, P., Plate, H., Martinez, M., Barais, O.: Taxonomy of Attacks on Open- Source Software Supply Chains. arXiv. arXiv:2204.04008 [cs] (2022). https:// doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.04008 . https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.04008 Accessed 2023-03-27

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.04008 2022

  12. [12]

    Organised Sound8(3), 321–330 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1017/ S135577180300030X 24

    Collins, N., McLean, A., Rohrhuber, J., Ward, A.: Live coding in laptop performance. Organised Sound8(3), 321–330 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1017/ S135577180300030X 24

    2003

  13. [13]

    Leonardo44(3), 207–211 (2011) https: //doi.org/10.1162/LEON a 00164

    Collins, N.: Live Coding of Consequence. Leonardo44(3), 207–211 (2011) https: //doi.org/10.1162/LEON a 00164

    work page doi:10.1162/leon 2011

  14. [14]

    In: Pro- ceedings of the 2007 International Symposium on Wikis

    Wilkinson, D.M., Huberman, B.A.: Cooperation and quality in wikipedia. In: Pro- ceedings of the 2007 International Symposium on Wikis. WikiSym ’07, pp. 157–

    2007

  15. [15]

    https: //doi.org/10.1145/1296951.1296968 .https://doi.org/10.1145/1296951.1296968 Accessed 2022-11-08

    Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2007). https: //doi.org/10.1145/1296951.1296968 .https://doi.org/10.1145/1296951.1296968 Accessed 2022-11-08

    work page doi:10.1145/1296951.1296968 2007

  16. [16]

    In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Com- puting

    Klein, M., Maillart, T., Chuang, J.: The Virtuous Circle of Wikipedia: Recursive Measures of Collaboration Structures. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Com- puting. CSCW ’15, pp. 1106–1115. Association for Computing Machin- ery, New York, NY, USA (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675286 . ht...

    work page doi:10.1145/2675133.2675286 2015

  17. [17]

    Nature596(7873), 583–589 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2

    Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., ˇZ´ ıdek, A., Potapenko, A., Bridgland, A., Meyer, C., Kohl, S.A.A., Ballard, A.J., Cowie, A., Romera-Paredes, B., Nikolov, S., Jain, R., Adler, J., Back, T., Petersen, S., Reiman, D., Clancy, E., Zielinski, M., Steinegger, M., Pacholska, M., Berg...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 2021

  18. [18]

    Nature620(7972), 47–60 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-023-06221-2

    Wang, H., Fu, T., Du, Y., Gao, W., Huang, K., Liu, Z., Chandak, P., Liu, S., Van Katwyk, P., Deac, A., Anandkumar, A., Bergen, K., Gomes, C.P., Ho, S., Kohli, P., Lasenby, J., Leskovec, J., Liu, T.-Y., Manrai, A., Marks, D., Ramsundar, B., Song, L., Sun, J., Tang, J., Veliˇ ckovi´ c, P., Welling, M., Zhang, L., Coley, C.W., Bengio, Y., Zitnik, M.: Scienti...

    2023

  19. [19]

    Dialogues in Human Geography3(3), 274–279 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820613513390

    Batty, M.: Big data, smart cities and city planning. Dialogues in Human Geography3(3), 274–279 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820613513390

    work page doi:10.1177/2043820613513390 2013

  20. [20]

    IEEE Power and Energy Magazine 8(1), 18–28 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1109/MPE.2009.934876

    Farhangi, H.: The path of the smart grid. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine 8(1), 18–28 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1109/MPE.2009.934876

    work page doi:10.1109/mpe.2009.934876 2010

  21. [21]

    Government Information Quarterly 29(4), 446–454 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003

    Linders, D.: From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citi- zen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly 29(4), 446–454 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003 2012

  22. [22]

    Jour- nal of Cybersecurity3(2), 81–90 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyx008

    Maillart, T., Zhao, M., Grossklags, J., Chuang, J.: Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow? Revisiting Eric Raymond with bug bounty programs. Jour- nal of Cybersecurity3(2), 81–90 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyx008 . Accessed 2022-08-25 25

    work page doi:10.1093/cybsec/tyx008 2017

  23. [23]

    Journal of Cybersecurity9(1), 021 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyad021

    Gillard, S., Percia David, D., Mermoud, A., Maillart, T.: Efficient collective action for tackling time-critical cybersecurity threats. Journal of Cybersecurity9(1), 021 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyad021 . Accessed 2024-05-29

    work page doi:10.1093/cybsec/tyad021 2023

  24. [24]

    In: Pro- ceedings of the 2016 ACM Workshop on Information Sharing and Collaborative Security (WISCS), pp

    Wagner, C., Dulaunoy, A., Wagener, G., Iklody, A.: MISP: The Design and Implementation of a Collaborative Threat Intelligence Sharing Platform. In: Pro- ceedings of the 2016 ACM Workshop on Information Sharing and Collaborative Security (WISCS), pp. 49–56 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2994539.2994542 . https://doi.org/10.1145/2994539.2994542

    work page doi:10.1145/2994539.2994542 2016

  25. [25]

    ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology11(3), 309–346 (2002)

    Mockus, A., Fielding, R.T., Herbsleb, J.D.: Two Case Studies of Open Source Software Development: Apache and Mozilla. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology11(3), 309–346 (2002)

    2002

  26. [26]

    Organization Science14(6), 633–649 (2003)

    Lee, G.K., Cole, R.E.: From a Firm-Based to a Community-Based Model of Knowledge Creation: The Case of the Linux Kernel Development. Organization Science14(6), 633–649 (2003)

    2003

  27. [27]

    In: Pro- ceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Coopera- tive Work

    Dabbish, L., Stuart, C., Tsay, J., Herbsleb, J.: Social coding in GitHub: transparency and collaboration in an open software repository. In: Pro- ceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Coopera- tive Work. CSCW ’12, pp. 1277–1286. Association for Computing Machin- ery, New York, NY, USA (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145396 . h...

    work page doi:10.1145/2145204.2145396 2012

  28. [29]

    Physical Review Letters101(21), 218701 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.218701

    Maillart, T., Sornette, D., Spaeth, S., Krogh, G.: Empirical Tests of Zipf’s Law Mechanism in Open Source Linux Distribution. Physical Review Letters101(21), 218701 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.218701

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.218701 2008

  29. [30]

    In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2007), pp

    Kittur, A., Suh, B., Pendleton, B.A., Chi, E.H.: He says, she says: Conflict and coordination in Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2007), pp. 453–462. ACM, ??? (2007). https: //doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240698 .https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240698

    work page doi:10.1145/1240624.1240698 2007

  30. [31]

    PLOS ONE7(6), 38869 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone

    Yasseri, T., Sumi, R., Rung, A., Kornai, A., Kert´ esz, J.: Dynamics of conflicts in Wikipedia. PLOS ONE7(6), 38869 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0038869

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone 2012

  31. [32]

    In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2014), pp

    Tsay, J., Dabbish, L., Herbsleb, J.: Influence of social and techni- cal factors for evaluating contribution in GitHub. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2014), pp. 356–366. ACM, ??? (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2568225.2568315 . 26 https://doi.org/10.1145/2568225.2568315

    work page doi:10.1145/2568225.2568315 2014

  32. [33]

    In: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (WikiSym 2011), pp

    Halfaker, A., Kittur, A., Riedl, J.: Don’t bite the newbies: how reverts affect the quantity and quality of Wikipedia work. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (WikiSym 2011), pp. 163–172. ACM, ??? (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/2038558.2038585 .https://doi.org/10.1145/2038558.2038585

    work page doi:10.1145/2038558.2038585 2011

  33. [34]

    Daedalus121(1), 17–30 (1992)

    Holland, J.H.: Complex adaptive systems. Daedalus121(1), 17–30 (1992)

    1992

  34. [35]

    Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)

    Mitchell, M.: Complexity: A Guided Tour. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)

    2009

  35. [36]

    Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics4, 1–23 (1973) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04

    Holling, C.S.: Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics4, 1–23 (1973) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04. 110173.000245

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.es.04 1973

  36. [37]

    Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society106(6), 467–482 (1962)

    Simon, H.A.: The Architecture of Complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society106(6), 467–482 (1962). Publisher: American Philosophical Society. Accessed 2025-07-16

    1962

  37. [38]

    Science159(3810), 56–63 (1968) https://doi

    Merton, R.K.: The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science159(3810), 56–63 (1968) https://doi. org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56

    work page doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.56 1968

  38. [39]

    Science 286(5439), 509–512 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509

    Barab´ asi, A.-L., Albert, R.: Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks. Science 286(5439), 509–512 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509

    work page doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 1999

  39. [40]

    Nature406(6794), 378–382 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1038/35019019

    Albert, R., Jeong, H., Barab´ asi, A.-L.: Error and Attack Tolerance of Complex Networks. Nature406(6794), 378–382 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1038/35019019

    work page doi:10.1038/35019019 2000

  40. [41]

    Physical Review Letters84(11), 2529–2532 (2000) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2529

    Carlson, J.M., Doyle, J.: Highly Optimized Tolerance: Robustness and Design in Complex Systems. Physical Review Letters84(11), 2529–2532 (2000) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2529 . Publisher: American Physical Society. Accessed 2025-07-16

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.2529 2000

  41. [42]

    3613–3629 (2025).https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity25/presentation/stoeger Accessed 2025-09-05

    St¨ oger, F., Birge-Lee, H., Giuliari, G., Subira-Nieto, J., Perrig, A.: BGP Vor- tex: Update Message Floods Can Create Internet Instabilities, pp. 3613–3629 (2025).https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity25/presentation/stoeger Accessed 2025-09-05

    2025

  42. [43]

    Physical Review Letters59(4), 381–384 (1987) https://doi.org/10

    Bak, P., Tang, C., Wiesenfeld, K.: Self-organized Criticality: An Explanation of the 1/f Noise. Physical Review Letters59(4), 381–384 (1987) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.59.381

    1987

  43. [44]

    The European Physical Journal B86(4), 27 1–19 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2013-30493-9

    Saichev, A.I., Maillart, T., Sornette, D.: Hierarchy of temporal responses of mul- tivariate self-excited epidemic processes. The European Physical Journal B86(4), 27 1–19 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2013-30493-9

    work page doi:10.1140/epjb/e2013-30493-9 2013

  44. [45]

    Ringelmann: On superlinear production in open source software

    Maillart, T., Sornette, D.: Aristotle vs. Ringelmann: On superlinear production in open source software. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 523, 964–972 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.04.130

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physa.2019.04.130 2019

  45. [46]

    Gesellschaft f¨ ur Informatik e.V., ??? (2016)

    Scholtes, I., Mavrodiev, P., Schweitzer, F.: From Aristotle to Ringelmann: A Large-scale Analysis of Team Productivity and Coordination in Open Source Software Projects. Gesellschaft f¨ ur Informatik e.V., ??? (2016). Accepted: 2017-06-21T07:37:17Z ISSN: 1617-5468.https://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/717 Accessed 2021-03-23

    2016

  46. [47]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3(CSCW), 74–17424 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1145/3359176

    Muri´ c, G., Abeliuk, A., Lerman, K., Ferrara, E.: Collaboration Drives Indi- vidual Productivity. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3(CSCW), 74–17424 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1145/3359176 . Accessed 2021-03- 23

    work page doi:10.1145/3359176 2019

  47. [48]

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathe- matical, Physical and Engineering Sciences382(2285) (2024) https://doi.org/10

    Maillart, T., Gomez, L., Lombard, E., Nolte, A., Pisano, F.: Computational diplo- macy: how ‘hackathons for good’ feed a participatory future for multilateralism in the digital age. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathe- matical, Physical and Engineering Sciences382(2285) (2024) https://doi.org/10. 1098/rsta.2024.0103 . Publisher: The R...

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [49]

    Physics Reports486(3), 75–174 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002

    Fortunato, S.: Community detection in graphs. Physics Reports486(3), 75–174 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002 2010

  49. [50]

    In: 2011 11th Inter- national Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, pp

    De Meo, P., Ferrara, E., Fiumara, G., Provetti, A.: Generalized Louvain method for community detection in large networks. In: 2011 11th Inter- national Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, pp. 88–93 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISDA.2011.6121636 . ISSN: 2164-7151. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISDA.2011.6121636

    work page doi:10.1109/isda.2011.6121636 2011

  50. [51]

    American Journal of Sociology110(4), 1132–1205 (2005) https: //doi.org/10.1086/421508

    Powell, W.W., White, D.R., Koput, K.W., Owen-Smith, J.: Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences. American Journal of Sociology110(4), 1132–1205 (2005) https: //doi.org/10.1086/421508

    work page doi:10.1086/421508 2005

  51. [52]

    Administrative Science Quarterly52(3), 443–475 (2007)

    Fleming, L., Mingo, S., Chen, D.: Collaborative Brokerage, Generative Creativity, and Creative Success. Administrative Science Quarterly52(3), 443–475 (2007)

    2007

  52. [53]

    Newman, M.E.J.: Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E64(1), 016132 (2001) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevE.64.016132

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.64.016132 2001

  53. [54]

    Social Networks30(1), 31–48 (2008) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.socnet.2007.04.006 28

    Latapy, M., Magnien, C., Del Vecchio, N.: Basic notions for the analysis of large two-mode networks. Social Networks30(1), 31–48 (2008) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.socnet.2007.04.006 28

    work page doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2007.04.006 2008

  54. [55]

    McInnes, L., Healy, J., Melville, J.: UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approxima- tion and Projection for Dimension Reduction. arXiv. arXiv:1802.03426 [cs, stat] (2018). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.03426 . https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.1802.03426 Accessed 2022-11-13

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.03426 2018

  55. [56]

    In: IPCC Energy and Industry Subgroup, Response Strategies Working Group (1989)

    Kaya, Y.: Impact of carbon dioxide emission control on GNP growth: interpreta- tion of proposed scenarios. In: IPCC Energy and Industry Subgroup, Response Strategies Working Group (1989)

    1989

  56. [57]

    Energy Policy33(7), 867–871 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.10

    Ang, B.W.: The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: a practical guide. Energy Policy33(7), 867–871 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.10. 010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2003.10 2005

  57. [58]

    Sci.52(7), 1116–1127 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0546

    Baldwin, C.Y., Clark, K.B.: The Architecture of Participation: Does Code Archi- tecture Mitigate Free Riding in the Open Source Development Model? Manage. Sci.52(7), 1116–1127 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0546

    work page doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0546 2006

  58. [59]

    Open Source Software Development 32(7), 1217–1241 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00050-7

    Krogh, G., Spaeth, S., Lakhani, K.R.: Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: a case study. Open Source Software Development 32(7), 1217–1241 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00050-7

    work page doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00050-7 2003

  59. [60]

    Correspondance math´ ematique et physique10, 113–121 (1838)

    Verhulst, P.-F.: Notice sur la loi que la population suit dans son accroissement. Correspondance math´ ematique et physique10, 113–121 (1838)

  60. [61]

    In: Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining

    Moradi-Jamei, B., Kramer, B.L., Calder´ on, J.B.S., Korkmaz, G.: Community formation and detection on GitHub collaboration networks. In: Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining. ASONAM ’21, pp. 244–251. Association for Comput- ing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2021). https://doi.org/10.1...

    work page doi:10.1145/3487351 2021

  61. [62]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association53(282), 457–481 (1958) https: //doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452

    Kaplan, E.L., Meier, P.: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association53(282), 457–481 (1958) https: //doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452

    work page doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 1958

  62. [63]

    Journal of the Royal Statistical Soci- ety

    Cox, D.R.: Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Soci- ety. Series B (Methodological)34(2), 187–220 (1972) https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j 1972

  63. [64]

    Information and Software Technology122, 106274 (2020) https://doi.org/10

    Coelho, J., Valente, M.T., Milen, L., Silva, L.L.: Is this GitHub project main- tained? Measuring the level of maintenance activity of open-source projects. Information and Software Technology122, 106274 (2020) https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.infsof.2020.106274 . Accessed 2022-11-08

    work page arXiv 2020

  64. [65]

    29 111734

    Moradi Dakhel, A., Majdinasab, V., Nikanjam, A., Khomh, F., Desmarais, M.C., Jiang, Z.M.J.: GitHub Copilot AI pair programmer: Asset or Liability? Journal of Systems and Software203, 111734 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2023. 29 111734 . Accessed 2025-09-17

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jss.2023 2023

  65. [66]

    In: 2025 IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengi- neering (SANER), pp

    Chen, Z., Jiang, L.: Evaluating Software Development Agents: Patch Patterns, Code Quality, and Issue Complexity in Real-World GitHub Scenarios. In: 2025 IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengi- neering (SANER), pp. 657–668 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER64311. 2025.00068 . ISSN: 2640-7574.https://doi.org/10.1109/SANE...

    work page doi:10.1109/saner64311 2025

  66. [67]

    Experience: Evalu- ating the Usability of Code Generation Tools Powered by Large Language Models

    Vaithilingam, P., Zhang, T., Glassman, E.L.: Expectation vs. Experience: Evalu- ating the Usability of Code Generation Tools Powered by Large Language Models. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Com- puting Systems. ACM, ??? (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519665 . https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519665

    work page doi:10.1145/3491101.3519665 2022

  67. [68]

    In: 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp

    Pearce, H., Ahmad, B., Tan, B., Dolan-Gavitt, B., Karri, R.: Asleep at the Keyboard? Assessing the Security of GitHub Copilot’s Code Contri- butions. In: 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 754–768. IEEE, ??? (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/SP46214.2022.9833571 . https://doi.org/10.1109/SP46214.2022.9833571

    work page doi:10.1109/sp46214.2022.9833571 2022

  68. [69]

    Cognitive Psychology5(2), 207–232 (1973) https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0010-0285(73)90033-9

    Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology5(2), 207–232 (1973) https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0010-0285(73)90033-9

    1973

  69. [70]

    Journal of Risk and Uncertainty1(1), 7–59 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055564

    Samuelson, W., Zeckhauser, R.: Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty1(1), 7–59 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055564

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00055564 1988

  70. [71]

    In: Pro- ceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency

    Sambasivan, N., Arnesen, E., Hutchinson, B., Doshi, T., Prabhakaran, V.: Re-imagining Algorithmic Fairness in India and Beyond. In: Pro- ceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21, pp. 315–328. Association for Computing Machin- ery, New York, NY, USA (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445896 . https:...

    work page doi:10.1145/3442188.3445896 2021

  71. [72]

    Big Data & Society6(1), 2053951719860542 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719860542

    Felzmann, H., Villaronga, E.F., Lutz, C., Tam` o-Larrieux, A.: Transparency you can trust: Transparency requirements for artificial intelligence between legal norms and contextual concerns. Big Data & Society6(1), 2053951719860542 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719860542 . Publisher: SAGE Publica- tions Ltd. Accessed 2025-09-17

    work page doi:10.1177/2053951719860542 2019

  72. [73]

    May, R.M.: Will a Large Complex System Be Stable? Nature238(5364), 413–414 (1972) https://doi.org/10.1038/238413a0

    work page doi:10.1038/238413a0 1972

  73. [74]

    Science378(6624), 1092–1097 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.abq1158

    Li, Y., Choi, D., Chung, J., Kushman, N., Schrittwieser, J., Leblond, R., Eccles, T., Keeling, J., Gimeno, F., Dal Lago, A., Hubert, T., Choy, P., Mas- son d’Autume, C., Babuschkin, I., Chen, X., Huang, P.-S., Welbl, J., Gowal, 30 S., Cherepanov, A., Molloy, J., Mankowitz, D.J., Sutherland Robson, E., Kohli, P., Freitas, N., Kavukcuoglu, K., Vinyals, O.: ...

    2022

  74. [75]

    Nature624(7990), 80–85 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06735-9

    Merchant, A., Batzner, S., Schoenholz, S.S., Aykol, M., Cheon, G., Cubuk, E.D.: Scaling deep learning for materials discovery. Nature624(7990), 80–85 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06735-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06735-9 2023

  75. [76]

    Sustainable Cities and Society83, 103942 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs

    Mahajan, S., Hausladen, C.I., Argota S´ anchez-Vaquerizo, J., Korecki, M., Hel- bing, D.: Participatory resilience: Surviving, recovering and improving together. Sustainable Cities and Society83, 103942 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs. 2022.103942 . Accessed 2024-05-23

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scs 2022

  76. [77]

    Internet Policy Review9(4) (2020)

    Pohle, J., Thiel, T.: Digital sovereignty. Internet Policy Review9(4) (2020). Accessed 2022-01-13

    2020

  77. [78]

    In: Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Account- ability and Transparency, pp

    Binns, R.: Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophy. In: Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Account- ability and Transparency, pp. 149–159 (2018). ISSN: 2640-3498. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/binns18a.htmlAccessed 2025-09-17

    2018

  78. [79]

    2009 , journal =

    Clauset, A., Shalizi, C.R., Newman, M.E.J.: Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Review51(4), 661–703 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1137/070710111 31 Supplementary Material Contents S.1 Bipartite-graph representation and aggregate ecosystem views p. 32 S.2 Community anatomy: temporal trajectories and size scaling p. 35 S.2.1 Why single-contributor ...

    work page doi:10.1137/070710111 2009

  79. [80]

    The light-teal fill marks the dormant gap [born but inactive that year]

    for both panels.B.1.Annual ecosystem commitsT(y) [blue, left log axis], mean commits per active community ¯e(y) =T(y)/N(y) [red, right log axis], and the cumulative number of communities bornNborn(y) [dark teal] and activeN(y) [light teal] on a shared linear axis, with a logistic fit (K= 252,r= 0.28, t0 = 2018.5) toN born(y). The light-teal fill marks the...

    2018