pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.25118 · v1 · pith:H52VUVR7new · submitted 2026-05-24 · 🪐 quant-ph

A framework for the benchmarking of transport-induced excitations in shuttling-based ion-trap quantum processors

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 00:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords ion-trap quantum processorsshuttlingtransport-induced excitationsmotional heatingprimitive operationsalgebraic combinationcompiler cost function
0
0 comments X

The pith

Transport-induced heating in ion-trap shuttling can be predicted by algebraically combining the effects of individual primitive operations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a framework that breaks shuttling protocols into a set of primitive operations such as linear transports and swaps. Each primitive is characterized independently for the heating it imparts to the ions' motional states. The total heating for any complete trajectory is then recovered from these separate values through a fixed algebraic expression rather than a new full simulation. The method is illustrated on an eight-qubit linear processor that uses these primitives to realize all-to-all connectivity. The same decomposition also supplies a cost function that compilers can use to penalize motional operations during gate scheduling.

Core claim

By decomposing any shuttling protocol into primitive operations and determining the heating contribution of each primitive in isolation, the total motional excitation produced by an arbitrary sequence of transports and swaps follows directly from an algebraic combination of those individual contributions.

What carries the argument

Decomposition of shuttling protocols into primitive operations whose heating properties are measured separately and then combined by an algebraic expression.

If this is right

  • Heating rates for complete ion trajectories are obtained without repeated full-protocol simulations.
  • Motional costs can be inserted directly into compiler cost functions for gate scheduling.
  • Heating performance of each primitive can be benchmarked and optimized independently.
  • The same algebraic rule applies to any processor design built from the same set of linear-transport and swap primitives.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Compilers could use the per-primitive costs to explore trade-offs between shuttling depth and overall error rate in algorithm mapping.
  • The framework supplies a way to compare the motional overhead of different connectivity graphs without resimulating every possible routing.
  • If the algebraic rule holds across devices, it offers a standardized metric for ranking shuttling architectures by their transport-induced error.

Load-bearing premise

The heating produced by one primitive does not depend on the sequence of other primitives that precede or follow it.

What would settle it

A full numerical trajectory simulation of a multi-primitive shuttling sequence whose total heating deviates from the algebraic prediction by more than the stated uncertainty of the individual primitive measurements.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.25118 by Brigitte Kaune, Christian Ospelkaus, Phil Nuschke, Rodrigo Munoz, Teresa Meiners.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: a) Electrode layout featuring a central gate zone with 14 control electrodes highlighted in red, an asymmetric RF electrode and two storage register to each side where the electrode number indicates the multiplexing of the control signals. The dots along the x-direction show the positions at which the ions may stay in rest. An example where all ions are stored in the left storage is shown. overlapped with … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Network slice. Nodes represent the different ion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Energy transfer for a single transported ion as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The three stages for merging or splitting a two-ion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The case of a purely quadratic potential is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Ion positions during splitting or merging for dif [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Equilibrium distance vs COM frequency for dif [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Frequency trajectories νcom(t) for two different transport schemes: a) symmetric and b) asymmetric, in the context of splitting and merging. For each νcom(t), the cor￾responding transport profiles from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Total transport time T needed for near-adiabatic two-ion splitting (n <¯ 1), with respect to the minimum fre￾quency νcrit and the slope parameter Nval of the transport profile. Analyzed for Nval = 3.3 (green), Nval = 3 (yellow) and Nval = 2.7 (blue) in the context of an asymmetric fre￾quency trajectory. The results in the case of merging are comparable, i.e., negligibly different. However, for reliably rea… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Average phonon excitation vs. transport time in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Voltage waveforms for the 14 DC electrodes of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Equilibrium positions in a rotating frame dur [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: IP and OOP mode frequencies of the two-ion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Average phonon number of the axial modes vs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Phonon excitation during two-ion merging with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Breakdown of the term structure within a hypo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Phonon excitations for reorderings that map the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Simulation of ion reorderings that map the ion configuration from Fig. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_19.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We develop a theoretical and numerical framework to analyze the effect of transport on the motional states of ions in a trapped-ion quantum processor. We decompose the shuttling protocol into primitive operations and characterize these in terms of their heating performance. Instead of having to simulate the whole transport protocol for each complete ion trajectory, the method allows us to determine the heating properties of each primitive operation separately and obtain the global result through an algebraic expression. We demonstrate our method by applying it to an 8-qubit quantum processor design based on linear transport and swap operations for all-to-all connectivity. We show how to incorporate the price of motional operations at the level of the compiler as a cost function.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a theoretical and numerical framework to analyze transport-induced excitations on motional states of ions in shuttling-based ion-trap processors. Shuttling protocols are decomposed into primitive operations that are individually characterized for heating performance; the global heating result for a full trajectory is then obtained via an algebraic expression rather than full end-to-end simulation. The framework is demonstrated on an 8-qubit linear-transport processor design that uses swap operations to realize all-to-all connectivity, and the motional-operation cost is incorporated into the compiler as an explicit cost function.

Significance. If the algebraic combination rule holds for the target device parameters, the framework offers a computationally efficient route to benchmark and optimize transport protocols in scaled ion-trap processors. The construction is presented with no free parameters and as a direct modeling choice whose validity is left to the specific hardware, which strengthens reproducibility. The explicit demonstration on an 8-qubit design together with compiler integration supplies a concrete, falsifiable use case.

minor comments (2)
  1. The precise algebraic expression that combines the primitive heating metrics should be stated explicitly (ideally as an equation) in the framework section so that readers can verify the claimed separation of primitives from global results.
  2. Figure captions and the 8-qubit demonstration section would benefit from a short statement of the numerical method used to extract the per-primitive heating values and any associated statistical uncertainty.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of the manuscript, the clear summary of its contributions, and the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were listed in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; framework is a new decomposition with algebraic combination presented as modeling choice

full rationale

The paper introduces a decomposition of shuttling protocols into primitive operations, characterizes each by heating metrics, and combines them via an algebraic expression to obtain global results without full trajectory simulation. This construction is self-contained as an empirical modeling framework applied to an 8-qubit design; the algebraic rule is stated as an assumption (linear or simple combination) rather than derived from or fitted to the target quantities. No self-definitional reductions, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided abstract or described derivation. The demonstration is an application of the framework, not a claim that forces the result by construction. The central claim remains independent of its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all such items are therefore recorded as empty.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5655 in / 1045 out tokens · 33419 ms · 2026-06-30T00:35:40.646225+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · 8 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    All of these quantities can be extracted from the heating analyses of the primitive operations. The only exception is the homogeneous contribution ¯ni,hom (¯ni−1,tot , ϑi−1), which must be evaluated based on the initial conditions — and therefore has to be re- calculated at each intermediate step of the full routine. However, this can be circumvented by c...

  2. [2]

    J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Physical Review Letters74, 4091 (1995)

  3. [3]

    Bermudez, X

    A. Bermudez, X. Xu, R. Nigmatullin, J. O’Gorman, V. Negnevitsky, P. Schindler, T. Monz, U. G. Poschinger, C. Hempel, J. Home, F. Schmidt-Kaler, M. Biercuk, R. Blatt, S. Benjamin, and M. Müller, Physical Review X7, 041061 (2017)

  4. [4]

    Kielpinski, C

    D. Kielpinski, C. Monroe, and D. J. Wineland, Nature 417, 709 (2002)

  5. [5]

    Experimental issues in coherent quantum-state manipulation of trapped atomic ions

    D. J. Wineland, C. Monroe, W. M. Itano, D. Leibfried, B. E. King, and D. M. Meekhof, “Experimental issues in coherent quantum-state manipulation of trapped atomic ions,” (1998), arXiv:quant-ph/9710025

  6. [6]

    N. M. Linke, D. Maslov, M. Roetteler, S. Debnath, C. Figgatt, K. A. Landsman, K. Wright, and C. Mon- roe, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, 3305 (2017)

  7. [7]

    L.Z.Cohen, I.H.Kim, S.D.Bartlett, andB.J.Brown, Science Advances8, eabn1717 (2022), arXiv:2110.10794 [quant-ph]

  8. [8]

    Sørensen and K

    A. Sørensen and K. Mølmer, Physical Review Letters 82, 1971 (1999)

  9. [9]

    Leibfried, B

    D. Leibfried, B. DeMarco, V. Meyer, D. Lucas, M. Bar- rett, J. Britton, W. M. Itano, B. Jelenković, C. Langer, T. Rosenband, and D. J. Wineland, Nature422, 412 (2003)

  10. [10]

    J. M. Pino, J. M. Dreiling, C. Figgatt, J. P. Gaebler, S.A.Moses, M.S.Allman, C.H.Baldwin, M.Foss-Feig, D. Hayes, K. Mayer, C. Ryan-Anderson, and B. Neyen- huis, Nature592, 209 (2021), arXiv:2003.01293 [quant- ph]

  11. [11]

    Y. Wan, R. Jördens, S. D. Erickson, J. J. Wu, R. Bowler, T. R. Tan, P.-Y. Hou, D. J. Wineland, A. C. Wilson, and D. Leibfried, Advanced Quantum Tech- nologies3, 2000028 (2020), arXiv:2003.03520 [quant- ph]

  12. [12]

    Husimi, Progress of Theoretical Physics9, 381 (1953)

    K. Husimi, Progress of Theoretical Physics9, 381 (1953)

  13. [13]

    On the Transport of Atomic Ions in Linear and Multidimensional Ion Trap Arrays

    D. Hucul, M. Yeo, W. K. Hensinger, J. Rabchuk, S. Olmschenk, and C. Monroe, “On the Transport of Atomic Ions in Linear and Multidimensional Ion Trap Arrays,” (2008), arXiv:quant-ph/0702175

  14. [14]

    Analysis of motional heating during ion- transport through RF junctions in a surface-electrode Paul trap,

    P. Nuschke, “Analysis of motional heating during ion- transport through RF junctions in a surface-electrode Paul trap,” (2025)

  15. [15]

    Fast ion swapping for quantum information processing

    H. Kaufmann, T. Ruster, C. T. Schmiegelow, M. A. Luda, V. Kaushal, J. Schulz, D. von Lindenfels, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and U. G. Poschinger, Physical Re- view A95, 052319 (2017), arXiv:1607.03734 [quant-ph]

  16. [16]

    Shortcuts to adiabatic rotation of a two-ion chain,

    A. Tobalina, J. G. Muga, I. Lizuain, and M. Palmero, “Shortcuts to adiabatic rotation of a two-ion chain,” (2021), arXiv:2106.09293 [quant-ph]

  17. [17]

    Ospelkaus, C

    C. Ospelkaus, C. E. Langer, J. M. Amini, K. R. Brown, D. Leibfried, and D. J. Wineland, Physical Review Let- ters101, 090502 (2008)

  18. [18]

    Ospelkaus, U

    C. Ospelkaus, U. Warring, Y. Colombe, K. R. Brown, J. M. Amini, D. Leibfried, and D. J. Wineland, Nature 476, 181 (2011)

  19. [19]

    Carsjens, M

    M. Carsjens, M. Kohnen, T. Dubielzig, and C. Os- pelkaus, inCLEO: 2014 (2014), Paper JTu4A.42(Op- tica Publishing Group, 2014) p. JTu4A.42

  20. [20]

    Wahnschaffe, H

    M. Wahnschaffe, H. Hahn, G. Zarantonello, T. Du- bielzig, S. Grondkowski, A. Bautista-Salvador, M. Kohnen, and C. Ospelkaus, Applied Physics Let- ters110, 034103 (2017), arXiv:1601.06460 [quant-ph]

  21. [21]

    H. Hahn, G. Zarantonello, M. Schulte, A. Bautista- Salvador, K. Hammerer, and C. Ospelkaus, npj Quan- tum Information5, 70 (2019), arXiv:1902.07028 [quant- ph]

  22. [22]

    Zarantonello, H

    G. Zarantonello, H. Hahn, J. Morgner, M. Schulte, A. Bautista-Salvador, R. F. Werner, K. Hammerer, and C. Ospelkaus, Physical Review Letters123, 260503 (2019)

  23. [23]

    M. Duwe, G. Zarantonello, N. Pulido-Mateo, H. Mend- para, L. Krinner, A. Bautista-Salvador, N. V. Vi- tanov, K. Hammerer, R. F. Werner, and C. Ospelkaus, Quantum Science and Technology7, 045005 (2022), 21 arXiv:2112.07714 [quant-ph]

  24. [24]

    Pulido-Mateo, H

    N. Pulido-Mateo, H. Mendpara, M. Duwe, T. Dubielzig, G. Zarantonello, L. Krinner, and C. Ospelkaus, Physi- cal Review Research6, L022067 (2024)

  25. [25]

    Srinivas, S

    R. Srinivas, S. C. Burd, H. M. Knaack, R. T. Suther- land, A. Kwiatkowski, S. Glancy, E. Knill, D. J. Wineland, D. Leibfried, A. C. Wilson, D. T. C. All- cock, and D. H. Slichter, Nature597, 209 (2021)

  26. [26]

    Harty and T

    T. Harty and T. P. Harty,High-Fidelity Microwave- Driven Quantum Logic in Intermediate-Field 43Ca+, http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text, Oxford University, UK (2013)

  27. [27]

    Hughes, R

    A. C. Hughes, R. Srinivas, C. M. Löschnauer, H. M. Knaack, R. Matt, C. J. Ballance, M. Malinowski, T. P. Harty, and R. T. Sutherland, “Trapped-ion two-qubit gates with>99.99% fidelity without ground-state cool- ing,” (2025), arXiv:2510.17286 [quant-ph]

  28. [28]

    P. C. Holz, S. Auchter, G. Stocker, M. Valentini, K. Lakhmanskiy, C. Rössler, P. Stampfer, S. Sgouridis, E. Aschauer, Y. Colombe, and R. Blatt, Advanced Quantum Technologies3, 2000031 (2020)

  29. [29]

    J. H. Wesenberg, Physical Review A78, 063410 (2008), arXiv:0808.1623 [quant-ph]

  30. [30]

    ARTIQ Releases — ARTIQ 8.9024+a1bf0e1 documentation,

    “ARTIQ Releases — ARTIQ 8.9024+a1bf0e1 documentation,” https://m- labs.hk/artiq/manual/releases.html

  31. [31]

    Guéry-Odelin, A

    D. Guéry-Odelin, A. Ruschhaupt, A. Kiely, E. Tor- rontegui, S.Martínez-Garaot, andJ.G.Muga,Reviews of Modern Physics91, 045001 (2019), arXiv:1904.08448 [quant-ph]

  32. [32]

    Controlling fast transport of cold trapped ions

    A. Walther, F. Ziesel, T. Ruster, S. T. Dawkins, K. Ott, M. Hettrich, K. Singer, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and U. Poschinger, Physical Review Letters109, 080501 (2012), arXiv:1206.0364 [physics]

  33. [33]

    Transport dynamics of single ions in segmented microstructured Paul trap arrays

    R. Reichle, D. Leibfried, R. B. Blakestad, J. Britton, J. D. Jost, E. Knill, C. Langer, R. Ozeri, S. Seidelin, and D. J. Wineland, Fortschritte der Physik54, 666 (2006), arXiv:quant-ph/0606237

  34. [34]

    Electrode Configurations for Fast Separation of Trapped Ions

    J. P. Home and A. M. Steane, “Electrode Configura- tions for Fast Separation of Trapped Ions,” (2005), arXiv:quant-ph/0411102

  35. [35]

    Towards Fast Separation of Trapped Ions with Inner Segmented Electrodes,

    L. Savas, “Towards Fast Separation of Trapped Ions with Inner Segmented Electrodes,” (2026)

  36. [36]

    Kaufmann,A Scalable Quantum Processor, Ph.D

    H. Kaufmann,A Scalable Quantum Processor, Ph.D. thesis (2017)

  37. [37]

    Negnevitsky (ETH Zurich, 2018) p

    V. Negnevitsky (ETH Zurich, 2018) p. 165 p., 20.500.11850/295923

  38. [38]

    A. H. Nizamani and W. K. Hensinger, Applied Physics B106, 327 (2012)

  39. [39]

    von Boehn, J

    M. von Boehn, J. Schaper, J. A. Coenders, J. Brom- bacher, T. Meiners, M. Niemann, J. M. Cornejo, S. Ul- mer, and C. Ospelkaus, Communications Physics8, 107 (2025)

  40. [40]

    Qi,Optimizing Ion-Shuttling Operations in Trapped- Ion Quantum Computers, Thesis, Massachusetts Insti- tute of Technology (2021)

    L. Qi,Optimizing Ion-Shuttling Operations in Trapped- Ion Quantum Computers, Thesis, Massachusetts Insti- tute of Technology (2021)

  41. [41]

    Speeding up Ion Transport in Scalable Trapped-Ion Quantum Processors,

    L. Krieger, “Speeding up Ion Transport in Scalable Trapped-Ion Quantum Processors,” (2026)

  42. [42]

    R. D. Delaney, L. R. Sletten, M. J. Cich, B. Estey, M. I. Fabrikant, D. Hayes, I. M. Hoffman, J. Hostetter, C. Langer, S. A. Moses, A. R. Perry, T. A. Peterson, A. Schaffer, C. Volin, G. Vittorini, and W. C. Burton, Physical Review X14, 041028 (2024), arXiv:2403.00756 [quant-ph]

  43. [43]

    Blakestad,Transport of Trapped-Ion Qubits within a Scalable Quantum Processor, Ph.D

    R. Blakestad,Transport of Trapped-Ion Qubits within a Scalable Quantum Processor, Ph.D. thesis, University of Colorado (2010)

  44. [44]

    J. P. Home, D. Hanneke, J. D. Jost, D. Leibfried, and D. J. Wineland, New Journal of Physics13, 073026 (2011), arXiv:1105.4752 [quant-ph]

  45. [45]

    Deslauriers, S

    L. Deslauriers, S. Olmschenk, D. Stick, W. K. Hensinger, J. Sterk, and C. Monroe, Physical Review Letters97, 103007 (2006)

  46. [46]

    Labaziewicz, Y

    J. Labaziewicz, Y. Ge, P. Antohi, D. Leibrandt, K. R. Brown, and I. L. Chuang, Physical Review Letters100, 013001 (2008)

  47. [47]

    Langer, R

    C. Langer, R. Ozeri, J. D. Jost, J. Chiaverini, B. De- Marco, A. Ben-Kish, R. B. Blakestad, J. Britton, D. B. Hume, W. M. Itano, D. Leibfried, R. Reichle, T. Rosen- band, T. Schaetz, P. O. Schmidt, and D. J. Wineland, Physical Review Letters95, 060502 (2005). Appendix A: Transport induced phonon excitation via propagator and generating functions Following...