pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.26021 · v1 · pith:552DV354new · submitted 2026-05-25 · 🪐 quant-ph

Toward General Quantum Control with Physics-Informed Large Language Models

Yusheng Zhao , Han Wang , Xin Liu , Xinjie Song , Jixi He , Lingwei Song , Yuanhe Ji , Ken Deng
show 5 more authors
Runqing Zhang Zhiguo Huang Ling Qian Jize Han Di Luo
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 21:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum controllarge language modelsphysics-informed AIquantum informationcontrol protocolsbenchmarkopen quantum systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

Physics-informed large language models generate high-fidelity analytic control protocols for generic quantum systems without task-specific training.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that VF-QCTRL, a framework pairing large language models with symbolic reasoning and optimization feedback, can propose and refine analytic control ansatze for quantum systems. A sympathetic reader would care because existing numerical solvers demand per-problem engineering and yield opaque pulses, while plain LLMs lack physical consistency. If the approach holds, it would enable training-free design of interpretable protocols that match or exceed conventional solvers across closed and open dynamics in both noiseless and noisy regimes. The authors support this by introducing QCTRL-BENCH, a suite of sixteen tasks spanning single- and multi-qubit cases, and by demonstrating favorable scaling with inference time and pulse resolution.

Core claim

VF-QCTRL applies to generic quantum control systems without task-specific training, achieves performance competitive with or exceeding state-of-the-art conventional solvers in both noiseless and noisy regimes with query efficiency, exhibits favorable inference-time scaling and pulse resolution scaling, and derives physically interpretable analytical protocols directly from prompts.

What carries the argument

The VF-QCTRL framework, which combines an LLM's symbolic reasoning with optimization feedback loops to propose and iteratively refine analytic control ansatze.

If this is right

  • The method works on both closed and open quantum dynamics without retraining.
  • Performance remains competitive in noisy regimes while using fewer queries than conventional solvers.
  • Inference-time and pulse-resolution scaling remain favorable as system size or sequence length grows.
  • The generated protocols are analytic expressions that admit direct physical interpretation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the LLM component can be swapped for newer models without retraining, the same pipeline could extend to control problems in molecular or many-body systems.
  • The interpretability of the analytic ansatze may allow experimentalists to translate LLM outputs into hardware instructions more directly than numerical pulse tables.
  • Success on the benchmark suggests the framework could serve as a starting point for hybrid human-AI design loops where physicists edit the proposed analytic forms.

Load-bearing premise

An off-the-shelf or lightly prompted large language model can reliably produce physically valid, high-fidelity control sequences for many different quantum systems and noise models without any task-specific fine-tuning.

What would settle it

A new multi-qubit open-system task with a noise model absent from QCTRL-BENCH on which VF-QCTRL produces control pulses whose fidelity falls below that of standard numerical solvers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.26021 by Di Luo, Han Wang, Jixi He, Jize Han, Ken Deng, Ling Qian, Lingwei Song, Runqing Zhang, Xinjie Song, Xin Liu, Yuanhe Ji, Yusheng Zhao, Zhiguo Huang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: iteration_n.md rendered for the Dicke-state task (normal mode). Each pill is the template variable; the bubble below shows the actual substituted content sent to the LLM at iteration ≥ 2. Gray text marks elisions / annotations, not real prompt content. Prepare a Dicke state. PHYSICS - 3 spin-1/2 particles, symmetric subspace (dim 4) - H(x1, x2) = 5.0 * [cos(x1)*Jx + cos(x2)*Jy] + 1.2 * Jz^2 - Initial: |0..… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: iteration_n_function_class.md rendered for the Dicke-state task (function-class mode). Same pill+bubble structure; same color rules. The system bubble now describes parameterized control bases, and previous attempts list expressions instead of numeric arrays. Prepare a Dicke state (FUNCTION-CLASS mode). PHYSICS - 3 spin-1/2 particles (dim 4) - H(x1, x2) = 5.0 * [cos(x1)*Jx + cos(x2)*Jy] + 1.2 * Jz^2 - Init… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantum control is essential for quantum information science and technology, yet designing high-fidelity control protocols remains challenging due to complex optimization landscapes, hardware noise, and long pulse sequences. Existing numerical solvers often require problem-specific engineering and produce opaque control amplitudes, while naive large language models (LLMs) lack the physical consistency and long-horizon precision for reliable quantum control synthesis. Here we introduce VF-QCTRL, a physics-informed large language model framework for general quantum control that combines symbolic reasoning with optimization to propose analytic control ans\"atze and coherently refine their parameters through feedback. To systematically evaluate LLM-driven quantum control, we develop QCTRL-BENCH, a benchmark spanning sixteen tasks across single- and multi-qubit systems, closed and open quantum dynamics, noiseless and noisy settings, and both analytic and numerical protocols. Across the benchmark, VF-QCTRL demonstrates strong universality, accuracy, efficiency, and interpretability: it applies to generic quantum control systems without task-specific training, achieves performance competitive with or exceeding state-of-the-art conventional solvers in both noiseless and noisy regimes with query efficiency, exhibits favorable inference-time scaling and pulse resolution scaling, and derives physically interpretable analytical protocols directly from prompts. Our results establish physics-informed LLM-based quantum control as a promising paradigm for accurate, efficient, interpretable, and training-free quantum control protocol design across a broad range of quantum systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper introduces VF-QCTRL, a physics-informed LLM framework that combines symbolic reasoning with optimization feedback to generate and refine analytic control ansätze for quantum systems. It also presents QCTRL-BENCH, a benchmark of 16 tasks spanning single- and multi-qubit systems, closed/open dynamics, and noiseless/noisy regimes. The central claims are that VF-QCTRL achieves universality (applicable to generic systems without task-specific training), competitive or superior performance to conventional solvers with query efficiency, favorable scaling, and physical interpretability of the resulting protocols.

Significance. If the performance and universality claims hold with rigorous quantitative support, the work would establish a new training-free paradigm for quantum control that could reduce problem-specific engineering and improve interpretability across diverse quantum platforms.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that VF-QCTRL 'applies to generic quantum control systems without task-specific training' and 'achieves performance competitive with or exceeding state-of-the-art conventional solvers' is presented without any quantitative results, error bars, baseline comparisons, or exclusion criteria. This absence makes the central performance and universality assertions impossible to evaluate from the provided text.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and (presumed) Methods: the universality claim requires that a single general prompting strategy plus symbolic/optimization feedback suffices for all 16 tasks without per-task adaptation. No evidence is supplied on whether prompt templates are uniform or whether distinct structures, system-specific examples, or hand-crafted symbolic templates are used per task category (single/multi-qubit, closed/open, noiseless/noisy). If the latter, performance would reflect prompt engineering rather than emergent LLM capability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address the two major comments point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that VF-QCTRL 'applies to generic quantum control systems without task-specific training' and 'achieves performance competitive with or exceeding state-of-the-art conventional solvers' is presented without any quantitative results, error bars, baseline comparisons, or exclusion criteria. This absence makes the central performance and universality assertions impossible to evaluate from the provided text.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by the inclusion of key quantitative results. While the main text (Sections 4–6 and Tables 1–3) reports full quantitative comparisons—including mean fidelities with standard deviations over multiple runs, direct baseline comparisons against GRAPE, Krotov, and other solvers, query counts, and explicit task coverage with no exclusions—the abstract itself summarizes these findings without numbers. We will revise the abstract to incorporate concise quantitative highlights (e.g., average fidelity and query-efficiency metrics across the 16-task benchmark) so that the central claims can be evaluated directly from the abstract. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and (presumed) Methods: the universality claim requires that a single general prompting strategy plus symbolic/optimization feedback suffices for all 16 tasks without per-task adaptation. No evidence is supplied on whether prompt templates are uniform or whether distinct structures, system-specific examples, or hand-crafted symbolic templates are used per task category (single/multi-qubit, closed/open, noiseless/noisy). If the latter, performance would reflect prompt engineering rather than emergent LLM capability.

    Authors: VF-QCTRL uses a single, uniform prompting strategy and symbolic-reasoning procedure for every task. The prompt template accepts the system Hamiltonian, initial/target states, control constraints, and (when applicable) noise model as inputs; the same physics-informed symbolic generation step and optimization-feedback loop are then applied without modification. No task-specific examples, hand-crafted symbolic templates, or category-dependent prompt structures were employed. This uniform procedure is described in Section 3 and Figure 1 and was used identically for all 16 tasks spanning the four categories. To make the uniformity explicit, we will add a clarifying statement in the revised Methods section and include the general prompt template in the supplementary material. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims rest on independent framework and benchmark

full rationale

The paper introduces VF-QCTRL as a novel combination of LLM prompting, symbolic reasoning, and optimization feedback for quantum control, evaluated on the newly defined QCTRL-BENCH spanning 16 tasks. No equations, fitted parameters, or performance metrics in the abstract or described claims reduce by construction to quantities defined from the same inputs or self-citations. The universality claim (no task-specific training) is presented as an empirical outcome of the general prompting strategy rather than a definitional tautology. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatze imported from prior author work are referenced in the provided text. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and externally falsifiable via the benchmark results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the central claim rests on the unstated premise that LLMs can be steered to respect quantum dynamics via prompting alone.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5810 in / 1097 out tokens · 31831 ms · 2026-06-29T21:53:48.563560+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    European Physical Journal D69, 279 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2015-60464-1

    Glaser, S.J., Boscain, U., Calarco, T., Koch, C.P., K¨ ockenberger, W., Kosloff, R., Kuprov, I., Luy, B., Schirmer, S., Schulte-Herbr¨ uggen, T., Sugny, D., Wilhelm, F.K.: Training Schr¨ odinger’s cat: quantum optimal control. European Physical Journal D69, 279 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2015-60464-1

    work page doi:10.1140/epjd/e2015-60464-1 2015

  2. [2]

    strategic report on current status, visions and goals for research in Europe

    Koch, C.P., Boscain, U., Calarco, T., Dirr, G., Filipp, S., Glaser, S.J., Kosloff, R., Montangero, S., Schulte-Herbr¨ uggen, T., Sugny, D., Wilhelm, F.K.: Quantum optimal control in quantum technologies. strategic report on current status, visions and goals for research in Europe. EPJ Quantum Technology9, 19 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-02...

    work page doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-022-00138-x 2022

  3. [3]

    Nature Communications10, 5464 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13534-2

    Wright, K., Beck, K.M., Debnath, S., Amini, J.M., Nam, Y., Grzesiak, N., Chen, J.-S., Pisenti, N.C., Chmielewski, M., Collins, C., Hudek, K.M., Mizrahi, J., Wong- Campos, J.D., Allen, S., Apisdorf, J., Solomon, P., Williams, M., Ducore, A.M., Blinov, A., Kreikemeier, S.M., Chaplin, V., Keesan, M., Monroe, C., Kim, J.: Benchmarking an 11-qubit quantum comp...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13534-2 2019

  4. [4]

    Applied Physics Reviews6(2), 021314 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5088164

    Bruzewicz, C.D., Chiaverini, J., McConnell, R., Sage, J.M.: Trapped-ion quantum computing: Progress and challenges. Applied Physics Reviews6(2), 021314 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5088164

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5088164 2019

  5. [5]

    Applied Physics Reviews , author =

    Krantz, P., Kjaergaard, M., Yan, F., Orlando, T.P., Gustavsson, S., Oliver, W.D.: A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits. Applied Physics Reviews 6(2), 021318 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5089550 41

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5089550 2019

  6. [6]

    Nature Physics16(2), 132–142 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-019-0733-z

    Browaeys, A., Lahaye, T.: Many-body physics with individually controlled Ryd- berg atoms. Nature Physics16(2), 132–142 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-019-0733-z

    2020

  7. [7]

    Nature622(7982), 268–272 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-023-06481-y

    Evered, S.J., Bluvstein, D., Kalinowski, M., Ebadi, S., Manovitz, T., Zhou, H., Li, S.H., Geim, A.A., Wang, T.T., Maskara, N., Levine, H., Semeghini, G., Omran, A., Lukin, M.D.: High-fidelity parallel entangling gates on a neutral-atom quantum computer. Nature622(7982), 268–272 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-023-06481-y

    2023

  8. [8]

    Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2007)

    D’Alessandro, D.: Introduction to Quantum Control and Dynamics. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2007). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781584888833

    work page doi:10.1201/9781584888833 2007

  9. [9]

    Journal of Magnetic Resonance172(2), 296–305 (2005) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2004.11.004

    Khaneja, N., Reiss, T., Kehlet, C., Schulte-Herbr¨ uggen, T., Glaser, S.J.: Optimal control of coupled spin dynamics: design of NMR pulse sequences by gradient ascent algorithms. Journal of Magnetic Resonance172(2), 296–305 (2005) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2004.11.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2004.11.004 2005

  10. [10]

    Marcel Dekker, New York (1996)

    Krotov, V.F.: Global Methods in Optimal Control Theory. Marcel Dekker, New York (1996)

    1996

  11. [11]

    Physical Review Letters106(19), 190501 (2011) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.190501

    Doria, P., Calarco, T., Montangero, S.: Optimal control technique for many- body quantum dynamics. Physical Review Letters106(19), 190501 (2011) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.190501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.190501 2011

  12. [12]

    npj Quantum Information5, 33 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-019-0141-3

    Niu, M.Y., Boixo, S., Smelyanskiy, V.N., Neven, H.: Universal quantum control through deep reinforcement learning. npj Quantum Information5, 33 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-019-0141-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0141-3 2019

  13. [13]

    Communications Physics2, 61 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-019-0169-x

    Porotti, R., Tamascelli, D., Restelli, M., Prati, E.: Coherent transport of quantum states by deep reinforcement learning. Communications Physics2, 61 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-019-0169-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-019-0169-x 2019

  14. [14]

    Reinforcement Learning in Different Phases of Quantum Control

    Bukov, M., Day, A.G.R., Sels, D., Weinberg, P., Polkovnikov, A., Mehta, P.: Rein- forcement learning in different phases of quantum control. Physical Review X8(3), 031086 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.031086 arXiv:1705.00565

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.031086 2018

  15. [15]

    Nature Machine Intelligence5(7), 780–791 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-023-00687-5 arXiv:2201.11790

    Metz, F., Bukov, M.: Self-correcting quantum many-body control using reinforce- ment learning with tensor networks. Nature Machine Intelligence5(7), 780–791 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-023-00687-5 arXiv:2201.11790

    work page doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00687-5 2023

  16. [16]

    Nature Communications14, 7138 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42901-3 arXiv:2210.16715 42

    Reuer, K., Landgraf, J., F¨ osel, T., O’Sullivan, J., Beltr´ an, L., Akin, A., Norris, G.J., Remm, A., Kerschbaum, M., Besse, J.-C., Marquardt, F., Wallraff, A., Eichler, C.: Realizing a deep reinforcement learning agent discovering real-time feedback control strategies for a quantum system. Nature Communications14, 7138 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42901-3 2023

  17. [17]

    Physical Review X15(4), 041012 (2025) arXiv:2402.17761

    Zen, R., Olle, J., Colmenarez, L., Puviani, M., M¨ uller, M., Marquardt, F.: Quantum circuit discovery for fault-tolerant logical state preparation with reinforcement learning. Physical Review X15(4), 041012 (2025) arXiv:2402.17761

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Physical Review Letters68(10), 1500–1503 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1500

    Judson, R.S., Rabitz, H.: Teaching lasers to control molecules. Physical Review Letters68(10), 1500–1503 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1500

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.68.1500 1992

  19. [19]

    Physical Review A95(4), 042318 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.042318

    Leung, N., Abdelhafez, M., Koch, J., Schuster, D.: Speedup for quantum optimal control from automatic differentiation based on graphics processing units. Physical Review A95(4), 042318 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.042318

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.95.042318 2017

  20. [20]

    Physical Review Research 8(1), 012043 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.8.L012043

    Vaidhyanathan, P., Marquardt, F., Mitchison, M.T., Ares, N.: Quantum feedback control with a transformer neural network architecture. Physical Review Research 8(1), 012043 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.8.L012043

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.8.l012043 2026

  21. [21]

    Machine Learning: Science and Technology1(3), 035009 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ab9802

    Sch¨ afer, F., Kloc, M., Bruder, C., L¨ orch, N.: A differentiable programming method for quantum control. Machine Learning: Science and Technology1(3), 035009 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ab9802

    work page doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ab9802 2020

  22. [22]

    PRX Quantum2, 020332 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PRXQuantum.2.020332

    Coopmans, L., Luo, D., Kells, G., Clark, B.K., Carrasquilla, J.: Protocol discovery for the quantum control of majoranas by differentiable programming and natural evolution strategies. PRX Quantum2, 020332 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PRXQuantum.2.020332

    2021

  23. [23]

    Teleportation Systems Toward a Quantum Internet,

    Porotti, R., Peano, V., Marquardt, F.: Gradient-ascent pulse engineering with feed- back. PRX Quantum4(3), 030305 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum. 4.030305 arXiv:2203.04271

    work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum 2023

  24. [24]

    PRX Quantum6(4), 040201 (2025) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.6.040201

    Duncan, C.W., Poggi, P.M., Bukov, M., Zinner, N.T., Campbell, S.: Taming quantum systems: A tutorial for using shortcuts-to-adiabaticity, quantum optimal control, and reinforcement learning. PRX Quantum6(4), 040201 (2025) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.6.040201

    work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.6.040201 2025

  25. [25]

    Review article (2026)

    Bukov, M., Marquardt, F.: Reinforcement Learning for Quantum Technology. Review article (2026)

    2026

  26. [26]

    Nature625, 476–482 (2024) https://doi.org/10

    Trinh, T.H., Wu, Y., Le, Q.V., He, H., Luong, T.: Solving olympiad geometry without human demonstrations. Nature625, 476–482 (2024) https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41586-023-06747-5

    2024

  27. [27]

    Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code

    Chen, M., Tworek, J., Jun, H., Yuan, Q., Pinto, H.P.d.O., Kaplan, J., et al.: Evaluating large language models trained on code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03374 (2021)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    43 Nature625(7995), 468–475 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06924-6

    Romera-Paredes, B., Barekatain, M., Novikov, A., Balog, M., Kumar, M.P., Dupont, E., Ruiz, F.J.R., Ellenberg, J.S., Wang, P., Fawzi, O., Kohli, P., Fawzi, A.: Mathematical discoveries from program search with large language models. 43 Nature625(7995), 468–475 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06924-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06924-6 2024

  29. [29]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.07961 (2024)

    Yang, R., Wang, Z., Gu, Y., Chen, T., Liang, Y., Li, T.: QCircuitBench: A large-scale dataset for benchmarking quantum algorithm design. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.07961 (2024). NeurIPS 2025

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Nature Machine Intelligence8, 148–157 (2026) arXiv:2406.00626

    Arlt, S., Duan, H., Li, F., Xie, S.M., Wu, Y., Krenn, M.: Meta-designing quantum experiments with language models. Nature Machine Intelligence8, 148–157 (2026) arXiv:2406.00626

    work page arXiv 2026

  31. [31]

    Arlt, S., Gu, X., Krenn, M.: Towards autonomous quantum physics research using LLM agents with access to intelligent tools (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control37(3), 332–341 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1109/9.119632

    Spall, J.C.: Multivariate stochastic approximation using a simultaneous pertur- bation gradient approximation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control37(3), 332–341 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1109/9.119632

    work page doi:10.1109/9.119632 1992

  33. [33]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2022)

    Lu, P., Mishra, S., Xia, T., Qiu, L., Chang, K.-W., Zhu, S.-C., Tafjord, O., Clark, P., Kalyan, A.: Learn to explain: Multimodal reasoning via thought chains for science question answering. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2022)

    2022

  34. [34]

    Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset

    Hendrycks, D., Burns, C., Kadavath, S., Arora, A., Basart, S., Tang, E., Song, D., Steinhardt, J.: Measuring mathematical problem solving with the MATH dataset. NeurIPS (2021) arXiv:2103.03874

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing4(2) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1145/3550488

    Li, A., Stein, S., Krishnamoorthy, S., Ang, J.: QASMBench: A low-level quantum benchmark suite for NISQ evaluation and simulation. ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing4(2) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1145/3550488

    work page doi:10.1145/3550488 2023

  36. [36]

    Quantum7, 1062 (2023) https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-07-20-1062

    Quetschlich, N., Burgholzer, L., Wille, R.: MQT Bench: Benchmarking software and design automation tools for quantum computing. Quantum7, 1062 (2023) https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-07-20-1062

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2023-07-20-1062 2023

  37. [37]

    Scientific Data9, 582 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01639-1

    Perrier, E., Youssry, A., Ferrie, C.: QDataSet, quantum datasets for machine learn- ing. Scientific Data9, 582 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01639-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01639-1 2022

  38. [38]

    In: International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2024)

    Tang, Y., Xiong, H., Yang, N., Xiao, T., Yan, J.: Towards LLM4QPE: Unsupervised pretraining of quantum property estimation and a benchmark. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2024)

    2024

  39. [39]

    Evaluating Large Language Models in Scientific Discovery

    Song, Z., Lu, J., Du, Y., Yu, B., Pruyn, T.M., Huang, Y., Guo, K., Luo, X., Qu, Y., Qu, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, H., Guo, J., Gan, J., Shojaee, P., Luo, D., Dillmann, S., Bran, A.M., Li, G., Zhao, Q., et al.: Evaluating Large Language Models in Scientific Discovery. Introduces the SDE (Scientific Discovery Evaluation) framework and the sde-harness project-leve...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    https: //github.com/BerriAI/litellm

    BerriAI: LiteLLM: Open Source AI Gateway for 100+ LLM providers. https: //github.com/BerriAI/litellm. Python SDK and proxy server providing a unified OpenAI-format interface to 100+ LLM providers. (2023)

    2023

  41. [41]

    Journal of Physical Chemistry A107(46), 9937–9945 (2003) https://doi.org/10

    Demirplak, M., Rice, S.A.: Adiabatic population transfer with control fields. Journal of Physical Chemistry A107(46), 9937–9945 (2003) https://doi.org/10. 1021/jp030708a

    2003

  42. [42]

    Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical42(36), 365303 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/42/36/ 365303

    Berry, M.V.: Transitionless quantum driving. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical42(36), 365303 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/42/36/ 365303

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8113/42/36/ 2009

  43. [43]

    Physical Review93(1), 99–110 (1954) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.93.99

    Dicke, R.H.: Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes. Physical Review93(1), 99–110 (1954) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.93.99

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.93.99 1954

  44. [44]

    Landau, L.D.: Zur theorie der energie¨ ubertragung. II. Physikalische Zeitschrift der Sowjetunion2, 46–51 (1932)

    1932

  45. [45]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A137(833), 696–702 (1932) https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1932.0165

    Zener, C.: Non-adiabatic crossing of energy levels. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A137(833), 696–702 (1932) https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1932.0165

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1932.0165 1932

  46. [46]

    Communi- cations in Mathematical Physics48(2), 119–130 (1976) https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF01608499

    Lindblad, G.: On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups. Communi- cations in Mathematical Physics48(2), 119–130 (1976) https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF01608499

    1976

  47. [47]

    Journal of Mathematical Physics17(5), 821–825 (1976) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.522979

    Gorini, V., Kossakowski, A., Sudarshan, E.C.G.: Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems. Journal of Mathematical Physics17(5), 821–825 (1976) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.522979

    work page doi:10.1063/1.522979 1976

  48. [48]

    An approximate Fourier transform useful in quantum factoring

    Coppersmith, D.: An approximate Fourier transform useful in quantum factoring. arXiv preprint arXiv:quant-ph/0201067 (2002). Originally IBM Research Report RC 19642 (1994)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  49. [49]

    Reviews of Modern Physics 89(1), 015006 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.015006

    Vitanov, N.V., Rangelov, A.A., Shore, B.W., Bergmann, K.: Stimulated Raman adiabatic passage in physics, chemistry, and beyond. Reviews of Modern Physics 89(1), 015006 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.015006

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.015006 2017

  50. [50]

    Reviews of Modern Physics84(2), 621–669 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.84.621

    Weedbrook, C., Pirandola, S., Garc´ ıa-Patr´ on, R., Cerf, N.J., Ralph, T.C., Shapiro, J.H., Lloyd, S.: Gaussian quantum information. Reviews of Modern Physics84(2), 621–669 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.84.621

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.621 2012

  51. [51]

    In: Automata, Languages and Programming

    Toffoli, T.: Reversible computing. In: Automata, Languages and Programming. Lec- ture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 85, pp. 632–644. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-10003-2 104

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-10003-2 1980

  52. [52]

    and Gambetta, Jay and Houck, A

    Koch, J., Yu, T.M., Gambetta, J., Houck, A.A., Schuster, D.I., Majer, J., Blais, A., Devoret, M.H., Girvin, S.M., Schoelkopf, R.J.: Charge-insensitive qubit design 45 derived from the Cooper pair box. Physical Review A76(4), 042319 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.76.042319

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.76.042319 2007

  53. [53]

    Physical Review Letters103(11), 110501 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.110501

    Motzoi, F., Gambetta, J.M., Rebentrost, P., Wilhelm, F.K.: Simple pulses for elimination of leakage in weakly nonlinear qubits. Physical Review Letters103(11), 110501 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.110501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.110501 2009

  54. [54]

    Journal of the American Chemical Society101(3), 760–762 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00497a058

    Morris, G.A., Freeman, R.: Enhancement of nuclear magnetic resonance signals by polarization transfer. Journal of the American Chemical Society101(3), 760–762 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00497a058

    work page doi:10.1021/ja00497a058 1979

  55. [55]

    Physical Review94(3), 630–638 (1954) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRev.94.630

    Carr, H.Y., Purcell, E.M.: Effects of diffusion on free precession in nuclear magnetic resonance experiments. Physical Review94(3), 630–638 (1954) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRev.94.630

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.94.630 1954

  56. [56]

    Physical Review Letters82(12), 2417–2421 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.82.2417 46

    Viola, L., Knill, E., Lloyd, S.: Dynamical decoupling of open quantum sys- tems. Physical Review Letters82(12), 2417–2421 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.82.2417 46

    1999