Pith. sign in

super hub Baseline reference

Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset

Baseline reference. 54% of citing Pith papers use this work as a benchmark or comparison.

468 Pith papers citing it
277 external citations · Pith
Baseline 54% of classified citations
abstract

Many intellectual endeavors require mathematical problem solving, but this skill remains beyond the capabilities of computers. To measure this ability in machine learning models, we introduce MATH, a new dataset of 12,500 challenging competition mathematics problems. Each problem in MATH has a full step-by-step solution which can be used to teach models to generate answer derivations and explanations. To facilitate future research and increase accuracy on MATH, we also contribute a large auxiliary pretraining dataset which helps teach models the fundamentals of mathematics. Even though we are able to increase accuracy on MATH, our results show that accuracy remains relatively low, even with enormous Transformer models. Moreover, we find that simply increasing budgets and model parameter counts will be impractical for achieving strong mathematical reasoning if scaling trends continue. While scaling Transformers is automatically solving most other text-based tasks, scaling is not currently solving MATH. To have more traction on mathematical problem solving we will likely need new algorithmic advancements from the broader research community.

hub tools

citation-role summary

dataset 48 background 32 method 1

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • abstract Many intellectual endeavors require mathematical problem solving, but this skill remains beyond the capabilities of computers. To measure this ability in machine learning models, we introduce MATH, a new dataset of 12,500 challenging competition mathematics problems. Each problem in MATH has a full step-by-step solution which can be used to teach models to generate answer derivations and explanations. To facilitate future research and increase accuracy on MATH, we also contribute a large auxiliary pretraining dataset which helps teach models the fundamentals of mathematics. Even though we are

authors

co-cited works

representative citing papers

Large Language Diffusion Models

cs.CL · 2025-02-14 · unverdicted · novelty 8.0

LLaDA is a scalable diffusion-based language model that matches autoregressive LLMs like LLaMA3 8B on tasks and surpasses GPT-4o on reversal poem completion.

Tandem Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards

cs.AI · 2026-06-26 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

TRL extends tandem training to RLVR pipelines, matching GRPO solo reasoning on Qwen3-4B math tasks while improving handoff robustness, reducing distributional drift, and increasing CoT legibility for the junior.

A Verifiable Search Is Not a Learnable Chain-of-Thought

cs.LG · 2026-06-20 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Verifiable search procedures cannot be learned as forward chain-of-thought by language models; they instead learn memorization, verification, or require precomputed catalogs.

GraphPO: Graph-based Policy Optimization for Reasoning Models

cs.CL · 2026-06-17 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

GraphPO represents reasoning rollouts as a DAG to merge semantically equivalent paths, share suffixes, and assign separate efficiency and correctness advantages for lower variance and better performance than chain or tree baselines.

Agreement in Representation Space for Open-Ended Self-Consistency

cs.CL · 2026-06-10 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

EBA clusters sampled LLM generations in representation space to estimate agreement, outperforming random selection with stable scaling and showing that central positions correlate with higher generation quality.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 468 citing papers.