pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.26212 · v1 · pith:3V4JVRATnew · submitted 2026-05-25 · ✦ hep-th

EFTs with Symmetric Moduli Spaces: the Landscape and the Swampland

Stephanie Baines , Veronica Collazuol , Bernardo Fraiman , Mariana Gra\~na , Daniel Waldram This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 20:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords Swampland Distance ConjectureEmergent String ConjectureSymmetric Moduli SpacesWeight PolytopesEffective Field TheoryString CompactificationsE8(8)Decompactification Limits
0
0 comments X

The pith

Assuming irreducible representations, only a finite list of symmetric moduli spaces and weight polytopes satisfy the Swampland Distance and Emergent String Conjectures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines effective field theories whose moduli spaces are symmetric spaces to determine which ones are consistent with the Swampland Distance Conjecture and the Emergent String Conjecture. It shows that the required exponential decay rates of towers of states are encoded in the weight polytopes of the particle representations. When those representations are irreducible, only finitely many such polytopes and moduli spaces exist. The different EFTs connect to one another through embeddings of moduli spaces or decompactification limits, and most can be reached by branching from an underlying E8(8) theory. Three cases in the list, however, cannot be obtained from any known M-theory or string-theory compactification, and the same embedding procedure identifies the string and brane representations that must appear in the spectrum.

Core claim

Under the assumption that particle states transform in irreducible representations, the symmetric moduli spaces compatible with the precise mass-decay rates demanded by the Emergent String Conjecture form a finite list; these spaces are related by embeddings or decompactification, most descend from the E8(8) theory via branching rules, yet three remain that cannot arise from string or M-theory compactifications, while the procedure also fixes the required string and brane representations.

What carries the argument

The weight polytope of an irreducible particle representation, which encodes the precise exponential decay rates required by the Swampland Distance Conjecture on a given symmetric moduli space.

If this is right

  • All admissible EFTs are connected by moduli-space embeddings or decompactification limits.
  • Branching rules under these embeddings must preserve the representation content.
  • Most theories in the list arise from an underlying E8(8)-based EFT.
  • Three specific cases in the finite list cannot be realized by M- or string-theory compactifications.
  • The string and brane representations required in each spectrum are fixed by the same embedding procedure.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The finiteness result would imply that the landscape of symmetric-space EFTs consistent with these swampland conjectures is discrete and small.
  • If the three exceptional cases truly cannot be realized, they would constitute concrete swampland exclusions beyond the distance conjecture itself.
  • Relaxing the irreducible-representation assumption could enlarge the list or produce infinite families, providing a clear test of the assumption's necessity.
  • The embedding relations suggest a partial order on the space of allowed EFTs that might extend to other classes of moduli spaces.

Load-bearing premise

That the particle states transform in an irreducible representation.

What would settle it

Explicit construction of a string or M-theory compactification that realizes one of the three exceptional symmetric moduli spaces with an irreducible representation whose decay rates match the conjecture.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.26212 by Bernardo Fraiman, Daniel Waldram, Mariana Gra\~na, Stephanie Baines, Veronica Collazuol.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Convex hulls with respect to the fundamental weight basis for the 3, 8, 6, 15∗ irreducible representations of sl(3, R) and for the 10, 14 and 16 irreducible representations of sp(4, R). Weights are shown as dots, with the largest ones being those in the Weyl orbit of the highest weight λ. The dashed line indicates the α-hull. One sees that local extrema of α(H) occur at edges of the convex hull where pairs… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Representation of the face FI at a distance dI from the centre of the weight diagram. for non-negative real coefficients γ i that are bounded depending on the shape of the face itself. In particular, the convex hull of the face FI is the convex hull of the orbit of λ under the subgroup of the Weyl group generated by reflections in the planes orthogonal to the fundamental roots in I. Not all subsets of root… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Perturbative hull for SO(2, 2) × R for the 4 representation of SO(2, 2) with R weight q forming the base of a cone parallel to the x − y plane, at height q on the z axis). minimum distance to the face as d(I ′ ,q) , and they are given by d 2 (I ′ ,q) = d 2 I ′ + q 2 , (3.20) where dI ′ is the corresponding distance to the convex hull Cλ′ in the G′ weight space. One key new point is that we should view that… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: SL(4, R), SL(3, R) × R and SO(2, 2) × R polytopes of the 12 representation of SL(4, R). 4 Allowed EFTs: general results In this section, we focus on EFTs in d ≥ 3 space-time dimensions with locally symmetric moduli spaces M = Γ\G/K satisfying the compactifiability condition, which implies the duality group Γ is arithmetic. As we have seen, the particle states have to transform in some representation ρ of G… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Convex hulls with respect to the fundamental weights basis for the 7, 27 and 77 irreducible representations of g2(2) where the metric ⟨·, ·⟩ in each case has been chosen so that length squared of the long roots are 6, 3 2 and 1 respectively, so that the three polytopes are identical. The minimal representation λmin is the 7, which is also the only representation without additional weights on the edges. One… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Examples of slices (a) passing through the centre of the original convex hull and (b) not passing through the centre, but orthogonal to a vertex. triangular prism as a decompactification slice as: 1 1 1 ∞ ∞ (This is the one case of a reducible representation that, for convenience, we included in the tree in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Polytopes with no Abelian factors (except for and n ∞) and their descendents. Vertical arrows indicate decompactification limits, with each colour corresponding to a differ￾ent polytope family. Dashed arrows indicate embeddings with the same value of d. Only the ones with z ≤ zmax are shown, such that the corresponding theories cannot be decompactified to more than d = 11. For clarity, we show only those r… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Example of how we can get both single and multiple irrep slices from the same Weyl polytope 1,2,3,∞, all in d = 3. (a) 71,2 slice, (b) □1,∞ slice and (c) hexagonal tower polytope with n = {1, 2} at the vertices. corresponding to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Embedding of C ′ = □2,∞ in C = 1,2,∞. These polytopes can be realised by the EFTs (sl2 ⊕ sl2,(2, 2), d = 4)n∅=2 and (so(4, 3), 8, d = 4) respectively. 5.2 Descendent polytopes: decompactifications For decompactification limits we again need a way of deriving a smaller, non-compact sym￾metric moduli space M′ from the original moduli space M. Rather than an embedding, this should be associated to a point on … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Decompactification limits of 1,2,∞ to △1,∞ and ∞ ∞. These can be realized respectively by (so(4, 3), 8, d = 4), (sl3, 3, d = 5) and (sl2, 2, d = 6). Moving along a geodesic corresponding to the F∅ face (or rather vertex) coloured in red in the first figure, decompactifies a single dimension. The corresponding parabolic group is maximal, with aP(Q) one-dimensional and given by the line R through the vertex… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Decompactification limits of 1,2,3,∞ ((e3(3),(2, 3), d = 8)) to 1,2,∞, ∞ 10D ∞ , 1 10D ∞ and • 11D (white dot). The first two are realized by (e2(2), 2(−3/ √ 14) ⊕ 1(4/ √ 14), d = 9) and (sl2, 2, d = 10) respectively. The isosceles triangle is not in our list in Tables 5 and 6 as the particle content is not in a single irrep. These two examples already capture the generic features of the decompactificatio… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Kaluza–Klein towers and emergent strings on the decompactified slice. Iterating this argument by decompactifying in the direction of the further vertices one finds that the particle hull C ′ defined by decompactifying the face FI of dimension k −1 (with k < r − 1) is given by C ′ = convex hull of vertices closest to FI (5.17) where by “closest” we mean each vertex of C ′ lies on a k-dimensional simplex wh… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Decompactification limits of 1,2,3,∞ to <=1,2,∞, 5D 1,∞ and • 6D. 5.3 String theory interpretation In this section we make a few comments about the theories that we classified in light of string/M theory. First of all, as we have already mentioned, our list of theories includes, as it should, the standard known cases of ed(d) and so(k, k) ⊕ R with the correct string theoretic particle representation. Furt… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: (a) C1, (b) in black 1 2C2, and in violet the weights corresponding to the vertices of C2 and (c) C max 2 . If we take the minimal representation λ1 = λmin then we can say something stronger about C2. Let λI = 2⃗αSt for each orthoplex face FI . 29 Then the only way to have 1 2C2 ⊂ C1 is if ρ2 is the sum of the irrep defined by the highest weights λI , that is ρ2 = M I∈orthoplex ρλI , (6.5) and C2 = conv [… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Kaluza-Klein, particle, string and Kaluza-Klein monopole states in the decom￾pactification of the 1,2,∞. From the orthogonal distance to the centre of each slice, we find the following exponential 49 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: The slices of the (d = 8, e3(3),(2, 3 ∗ )) polytope under the decompactification to (d = 9, e2(2)), showing KK mode, particle and string representations in purple, blue and green respectively. Decomposing under (sl2 ⊕R)⊕R ⊂ sl3 ⊕sl2, where the second R factor is the Cartan aP(Q) of the parabolic group defining the decompactification and measures the distance of the slices from the centre of the polytope, … view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: On the left the particle (pmax = 1), and on the right the pmax = 2 polytope for M-theory on a T 2 . As two final examples, consider the sp6 cubeoctahedron in d = 3 and the sl3 triangle in d = 5. Decompactifying one dimension for the cubeoctahedron we get five slices as shown in 53 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p054_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Decompactification slices of the cuboctahedron and triangle. 7 Conclusions In this paper we continued the study of the Swampland Distance Conjecture for locally sym￾metric moduli spaces M = Γ\G/K started in [1]. In particular, we considered the constraints on the allowed moduli space and particle representations ρ that came from imposing that the Emergent String Conjecture (ESC) holds. By this we mean tha… view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Dynkin diagrams of simple Lie algebras and the ordering convention for the simple roots. On the upper row we show the classical series Ar, Br, Cr, and Dr, while the exceptional types Er, F4, and G2 are on the bottom. B Ek(k) moduli spaces and pmax-polytopes Here we collect some extra information about the theories with Ek(k) moduli spaces and their polytopes. The representations for particles, strings and… view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Chain of embeddings of d = 3 single irrep polytopes of rank 2 or more, coming from ones with a fundamental representation. The seed polytope for each chain is shown in violet. 8 so(4,3) <=(2,2) sl⊕2 2 □(2) 4 sp4 □(2) (2,2) sl⊕2 2 14′ sp6 (2,2,2) sl⊕3 2 □(2) 5 sp4 (5,2) sp4 sl2 (4,2) sp4 sl2 V56 56 e7(7) oc(2) 27 sp8 oc(2) 28 so(4,4) oc(2) 26 f4(4) □(2) (3,2) sl⊕2 2 7(2) 14 g2(2) 7(2) 8 sl3 7 ∞ (6) 8 sl3 (… view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Chain of embeddings d = 4 single irrep polytopes of rank 2 or more coming from fundamental ones. The seed polytope for each chain is shown in violet. 64 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p065_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Chain of embeddings for d = 5 single irrep polytopes coming from fundamental ones. The seed polytope is shown in violet. demi16 so(5,5) (2) 8 so(4,3) (2) (2,2,2) sl⊕3 2 □(4) 5 sp4 (2) 4 sl2 (5) 4 sl2 <=(2) (2,2) sl⊕2 2 □(4) 4 sp4 □(4) (2,2) sl⊕2 2 (4) 3 sl2 <=(2) (3,2) sl⊕2 2 (2) (4,2) sp4 sl2 (4) 2 sl2 (∞)sl2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p066_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Chain of embeddings for d = 6 single irrep polytopes coming from fundamental ones. The seed polytope is shown in violet. 7 ∞ (3) 14 g2(2) (∞)sl2 oc26 f4(4) 8 so(4,3) △3 sl3 oc27 sp8 (4,2) sp4 sl2 V240 248 e8(8) V56 56 e7(7) V27 27 e6(6) demi16 so(5,5) tetro10∗ sl5 (2,3 ∗) sl2sl3 d = 8 d = 7 d = 6 d = 5 d = 4 d = 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p066_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Chains of decompactification slices for minimal representation and minimal n∅. Chains for non-minimal n∅ theories can be obtained by substituting n∅ → zn∅ and d → z(d − 2) + 2. 65 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p066_24.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Swampland Distance Conjecture (SDC) states that, for any infinite-distance limit in the moduli space of a quantum gravity effective field theory (EFT), there should exist an infinite tower of states that become exponentially light. According to the Emergent String Conjecture, such a tower should consist either of tensionless strings or of Kaluza-Klein modes, each with a mass-decay rate that depends in a precise way on the dimension of the effective field theory. In this paper, we use the results obtained in arXiv:2508.18401 on the SDC for symmetric moduli spaces and how these rates are encoded in the weight polytope of the corresponding particle-state representations to determine the symmetric space EFTs and representations that have these decay rates. Remarkably, assuming that the particle states transform in an irreducible representation, the list of possible polytopes and moduli spaces is finite. Different EFTs are related by embedding one moduli space in another or by taking a decompactification limit. Requiring compatibility of the particle representations under such branching, we find that, while most of the theories can be obtained from an EFT based on $E_{8(8)}$, there remain three in our list that appear to be impossible to get from M- or string-theory compactifications. Using the same embedding procedure, we also identify the string and brane representations that should be present in the spectrum.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript classifies effective field theories with symmetric moduli spaces whose SDC mass-decay rates match those required by the Emergent String Conjecture, using the weight-polytope encoding established in arXiv:2508.18401. Under the explicit assumption that particle states transform in irreducible representations, the admissible polytopes and moduli spaces form a finite list. These theories are related by moduli-space embeddings or decompactification limits; branching rules under embeddings show that most cases descend from an E_{8(8)} EFT, while three cases cannot be realized in M- or string-theory compactifications. The work also identifies the string and brane representations required in the spectrum.

Significance. If the classification holds, the result supplies a concrete, finite list of symmetric-space EFTs consistent with the SDC, together with explicit swampland exclusions and required higher-dimensional objects. The use of embedding relations and branching rules to connect different theories is a methodological strength that could be applied more broadly. The manuscript gives credit to the prior polytope encoding and performs a systematic extension rather than a standalone derivation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the finiteness of the list of polytopes and the identification of three unrealizable cases are obtained only after restricting to irreducible representations so that weight polytopes are well-defined and branching rules can be applied. The manuscript states the restriction but supplies no argument that reducible representations are absent or reduce to the irreducible case while preserving the SDC decay rates; if reducible representations are admitted, the set of admissible polytopes need not remain finite and the embedding analysis could admit additional solutions.
  2. [Classification and embedding analysis] The classification and E_{8(8)} embedding procedure (described after the abstract): the compatibility checks and exclusion of the three cases rest entirely on the SDC rates and polytope encoding imported from arXiv:2508.18401 without re-derivation or independent verification of the weight-polytope matching in this work. This makes the load-bearing steps of the finiteness claim and the swampland exclusions dependent on the unexamined prior results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We respond point-by-point to the major comments below, indicating where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the finiteness of the list of polytopes and the identification of three unrealizable cases are obtained only after restricting to irreducible representations so that weight polytopes are well-defined and branching rules can be applied. The manuscript states the restriction but supplies no argument that reducible representations are absent or reduce to the irreducible case while preserving the SDC decay rates; if reducible representations are admitted, the set of admissible polytopes need not remain finite and the embedding analysis could admit additional solutions.

    Authors: We agree that the restriction to irreducible representations is essential for the weight-polytope formalism and branching rules from arXiv:2508.18401. While the manuscript states the assumption explicitly, we will add a clarifying paragraph in the introduction explaining that any reducible representation decomposes into irreducibles and that the SDC decay rate is governed by the irreducible component yielding the slowest decay (smallest exponent). This reduces the problem to the irreducible case without generating additional admissible polytopes, thereby preserving finiteness. We will also note this in the abstract for emphasis. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Classification and embedding analysis] The classification and E_{8(8)} embedding procedure (described after the abstract): the compatibility checks and exclusion of the three cases rest entirely on the SDC rates and polytope encoding imported from arXiv:2508.18401 without re-derivation or independent verification of the weight-polytope matching in this work. This makes the load-bearing steps of the finiteness claim and the swampland exclusions dependent on the unexamined prior results.

    Authors: The manuscript is explicitly an application of the established polytope-encoding framework from arXiv:2508.18401 to classify symmetric-space EFTs and perform the embedding analysis. Our original contributions are the exhaustive enumeration under the irreducibility assumption, the systematic use of branching rules to connect theories, and the identification of the three swampland cases. We do not re-derive the prior results, as is standard for follow-up work, but we will add a concise summary of the relevant SDC-rate and polytope-matching statements from the reference (with explicit citations) in Section 2 to make the dependence transparent and self-contained. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; new classification extends prior encoding without tautological reduction

full rationale

The derivation begins from the SDC rates and polytope encoding imported from arXiv:2508.18401, then imposes the explicit assumption of irreducible representations to obtain finiteness of the list, followed by embedding/branching analysis to relate EFTs and flag three unrealizable cases. This chain does not reduce any output (the finite list, the E8(8) embeddings, or the exclusions) to the inputs by construction; the finiteness and compatibility checks are consequences of the stated assumption plus branching rules applied to the imported data. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citation chains appear. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks because the new results (the specific list and the three exclusions) are not equivalent to quantities already fixed in the cited paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on two domain conjectures taken from the swampland literature and on the mathematical results of the cited prior paper; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Swampland Distance Conjecture holds and its rates are encoded in weight polytopes of representations
    Taken as input from the literature and arXiv:2508.18401.
  • domain assumption Emergent String Conjecture correctly specifies the allowed mass-decay rates for string and KK towers
    Used to filter which polytopes are acceptable.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5796 in / 1430 out tokens · 37404 ms · 2026-06-29T20:18:09.736021+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages · 27 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Baines, V

    S. Baines, V. Collazuol, B. Fraiman, M. Gra˜ na, and D. Waldram,The Boundary of Symmetric Moduli Spaces and the Swampland Distance Conjecture, arXiv:2508.18401

    work page arXiv

  2. [2]

    The String Landscape and the Swampland

    C. Vafa,The String landscape and the swampland,hep-th/0509212

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    T. D. Brennan, F. Carta, and C. Vafa,The String Landscape, the Swampland, and the Missing Corner,PoSTASI2017(2017) 015, [arXiv:1711.00864]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    The Swampland: Introduction and Review

    E. Palti,The Swampland: Introduction and Review,Fortsch. Phys.67(2019), no. 6 1900037, [arXiv:1903.06239]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    N. B. Agmon, A. Bedroya, M. J. Kang, and C. Vafa,Lectures on the string landscape and the Swampland,arXiv:2212.06187

    work page arXiv

  6. [6]

    van Beest, J

    M. van Beest, J. Calder´ on-Infante, D. Mirfendereski, and I. Valenzuela,Lectures on the Swampland Program in String Compactifications,arXiv:2102.01111

    work page arXiv

  7. [7]

    Gra˜ na and A

    M. Gra˜ na and A. Herr´ aez,The Swampland Conjectures: A Bridge from Quantum Gravity to Particle Physics,Universe7(2021), no. 8 273, [arXiv:2107.00087]

    work page arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa,On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland, Nucl. Phys. B766(2007) 21–33, [hep-th/0605264]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  9. [9]

    Black Holes and Large N Species Solution to the Hierarchy Problem

    G. Dvali,Black Holes and Large N Species Solution to the Hierarchy Problem,Fortsch. Phys.58(2010) 528–536, [arXiv:0706.2050]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  10. [10]

    Black Hole Bound on the Number of Species and Quantum Gravity at LHC

    G. Dvali and M. Redi,Black Hole Bound on the Number of Species and Quantum Gravity at LHC,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 045027, [arXiv:0710.4344]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  11. [11]

    Evaporation of Microscopic Black Holes in String Theory and the Bound on Species

    G. Dvali and D. Lust,Evaporation of Microscopic Black Holes in String Theory and the Bound on Species,Fortsch. Phys.58(2010) 505–527, [arXiv:0912.3167]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  12. [12]

    Species and Strings

    G. Dvali and C. Gomez,Species and Strings,arXiv:1004.3744

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    Hamada, M

    Y. Hamada, M. Montero, C. Vafa, and I. Valenzuela,Finiteness and the swampland,J. Phys. A55(2022), no. 22 224005, [arXiv:2111.00015]

    work page arXiv 2022

  14. [14]

    Stout,Infinite Distance Limits and Information Theory,arXiv:2106.11313

    J. Stout,Infinite Distance Limits and Information Theory,arXiv:2106.11313

    work page arXiv

  15. [15]

    Stout,Infinite Distances and Factorization,arXiv:2208.08444

    J. Stout,Infinite Distances and Factorization,arXiv:2208.08444

    work page arXiv

  16. [16]

    Calder´ on-Infante, A

    J. Calder´ on-Infante, A. Castellano, A. Herr´ aez, and L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez,Entropy bounds and the species scale distance conjecture,JHEP01(2024) 039, [arXiv:2306.16450]. 66

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche, and T. Weigand,Tensionless Strings and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,JHEP10(2018) 164, [arXiv:1808.05958]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche, and T. Weigand,Emergent strings from infinite distance limits, JHEP02(2022) 190, [arXiv:1910.01135]

    work page arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Etheredge, B

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, S. Kaya, Y. Qiu, and T. Rudelius,Sharpening the Distance Conjecture in diverse dimensions,JHEP12(2022) 114, [arXiv:2206.04063]

    work page arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Gendler and I

    N. Gendler and I. Valenzuela,Merging the weak gravity and distance conjectures using BPS extremal black holes,JHEP01(2021) 176, [arXiv:2004.10768]

    work page arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Bedroya and C

    A. Bedroya and C. Vafa,Trans-Planckian Censorship and the Swampland,JHEP09 (2020) 123, [arXiv:1909.11063]

    work page arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    Andriot, N

    D. Andriot, N. Cribiori, and D. Erkinger,The web of swampland conjectures and the TCC bound,JHEP07(2020) 162, [arXiv:2004.00030]

    work page arXiv 2020

  23. [23]

    Lanza, F

    S. Lanza, F. Marchesano, L. Martucci, and I. Valenzuela,Swampland Conjectures for Strings and Membranes,JHEP02(2021) 006, [arXiv:2006.15154]

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Etheredge, B

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, J. McNamara, T. Rudelius, I. Ruiz, and I. Valenzuela, Running decompactification, sliding towers, and the distance conjecture,JHEP12 (2023) 182, [arXiv:2306.16440]

    work page arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Alice in Warpland: KK modes, Warped Compactifications and the Swampland

    S. Raucci, I. Ruiz, and I. Valenzuela,Alice in Warpland: KK modes, Warped Compactifications and the Swampland,arXiv:2603.11163

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    Sharpening the Weak Gravity Conjecture with Dimensional Reduction

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece, and T. Rudelius,Sharpening the Weak Gravity Conjecture with Dimensional Reduction,JHEP02(2016) 140, [arXiv:1509.06374]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  27. [27]

    The Swampland Conjecture and F-term Axion Monodromy Inflation

    R. Blumenhagen, I. Valenzuela, and F. Wolf,The Swampland Conjecture and F-term Axion Monodromy Inflation,JHEP07(2017) 145, [arXiv:1703.05776]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  28. [28]

    T. W. Grimm, E. Palti, and I. Valenzuela,Infinite Distances in Field Space and Massless Towers of States,JHEP08(2018) 143, [arXiv:1802.08264]

    work page arXiv 2018

  29. [29]

    Emergence and the Swampland Conjectures

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece, and T. Rudelius,Emergence of Weak Coupling at Large Distance in Quantum Gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018), no. 5 051601, [arXiv:1802.08698]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  30. [30]

    The Refined Swampland Distance Conjecture in Calabi-Yau Moduli Spaces

    R. Blumenhagen, D. Kl¨ awer, L. Schlechter, and F. Wolf,The Refined Swampland Distance Conjecture in Calabi-Yau Moduli Spaces,JHEP06(2018) 052, [arXiv:1803.04989]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche, and T. Weigand,A Stringy Test of the Scalar Weak Gravity Conjecture,Nucl. Phys. B938(2019) 321–350, [arXiv:1810.05169]. 67

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  32. [32]

    Distance and de Sitter Conjectures on the Swampland

    H. Ooguri, E. Palti, G. Shiu, and C. Vafa,Distance and de Sitter Conjectures on the Swampland,Phys. Lett. B788(2019) 180–184, [arXiv:1810.05506]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  33. [33]

    Corvilain, T

    P. Corvilain, T. W. Grimm, and I. Valenzuela,The Swampland Distance Conjecture for K¨ ahler moduli,JHEP08(2019) 075, [arXiv:1812.07548]

    work page arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    T. W. Grimm, C. Li, and E. Palti,Infinite Distance Networks in Field Space and Charge Orbits,JHEP03(2019) 016, [arXiv:1811.02571]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    Buratti, J

    G. Buratti, J. Calder´ on, and A. M. Uranga,Transplanckian axion monodromy!?, JHEP05(2019) 176, [arXiv:1812.05016]

    work page arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    L¨ ust, E

    D. L¨ ust, E. Palti, and C. Vafa,AdS and the Swampland,Phys. Lett. B797(2019) 134867, [arXiv:1906.05225]

    work page arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    Joshi and A

    A. Joshi and A. Klemm,Swampland Distance Conjecture for One-Parameter Calabi-Yau Threefolds,JHEP08(2019) 086, [arXiv:1903.00596]

    work page arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    Erkinger and J

    D. Erkinger and J. Knapp,Refined swampland distance conjecture and exotic hybrid Calabi-Yaus,JHEP07(2019) 029, [arXiv:1905.05225]

    work page arXiv 2019

  39. [39]

    Marchesano and M

    F. Marchesano and M. Wiesner,Instantons and infinite distances,JHEP08(2019) 088, [arXiv:1904.04848]

    work page arXiv 2019

  40. [40]

    A. Font, A. Herr´ aez, and L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez,The Swampland Distance Conjecture and Towers of Tensionless Branes,JHEP08(2019) 044, [arXiv:1904.05379]

    work page arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    Baume and J

    F. Baume and J. Calder´ on Infante,Tackling the SDC in AdS with CFTs,JHEP08 (2021) 057, [arXiv:2011.03583]

    work page arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    Perlmutter, L

    E. Perlmutter, L. Rastelli, C. Vafa, and I. Valenzuela,A CFT distance conjecture, JHEP10(2021) 070, [arXiv:2011.10040]

    work page arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    Klaewer, S.-J

    D. Klaewer, S.-J. Lee, T. Weigand, and M. Wiesner,Quantum corrections in 4dN= 1 infinite distance limits and the weak gravity conjecture,JHEP03(2021) 252, [arXiv:2011.00024]

    work page arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    Lanza, F

    S. Lanza, F. Marchesano, L. Martucci, and I. Valenzuela,The EFT stringy viewpoint on large distances,JHEP09(2021) 197, [arXiv:2104.05726]

    work page arXiv 2021

  45. [45]

    Lee and T

    S.-J. Lee and T. Weigand,Elliptic K3 surfaces at infinite complex structure and their refined Kulikov models,JHEP09(2022) 143, [arXiv:2112.07682]

    work page arXiv 2022

  46. [46]

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche, and T. Weigand,Physics of infinite complex structure limits in eight dimensions,JHEP06(2022) 042, [arXiv:2112.08385]. 68

    work page arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    Rudelius,Asymptotic scalar field cosmology in string theory,JHEP10(2022) 018, [arXiv:2208.08989]

    T. Rudelius,Asymptotic scalar field cosmology in string theory,JHEP10(2022) 018, [arXiv:2208.08989]

    work page arXiv 2022

  48. [48]

    Baume and J

    F. Baume and J. Calder´ on-Infante,On higher-spin points and infinite distances in conformal manifolds,JHEP12(2023) 163, [arXiv:2305.05693]

    work page arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    Rudelius,Revisiting the refined Distance Conjecture,JHEP09(2023) 130, [arXiv:2303.12103]

    T. Rudelius,Revisiting the refined Distance Conjecture,JHEP09(2023) 130, [arXiv:2303.12103]

    work page arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    ´Alvarez-Garc´ ıa, S.-J

    R. ´Alvarez-Garc´ ıa, S.-J. Lee, and T. Weigand,Non-minimal elliptic threefolds at infinite distance. Part I. Log Calabi-Yau resolutions,JHEP08(2024) 240, [arXiv:2310.07761]

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    ´Alvarez-Garc´ ıa, S.-J

    R. ´Alvarez-Garc´ ıa, S.-J. Lee, and T. Weigand,Non-minimal elliptic threefolds at infinite distance II: asymptotic physics,JHEP01(2025) 058, [arXiv:2312.11611]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Castellano, I

    A. Castellano, I. Ruiz, and I. Valenzuela,Stringy evidence for a universal pattern at infinite distance,JHEP06(2024) 037, [arXiv:2311.01536]

    work page arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Castellano, I

    A. Castellano, I. Ruiz, and I. Valenzuela,Universal Pattern in Quantum Gravity at Infinite Distance,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024), no. 18 181601, [arXiv:2311.01501]

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    Ooguri and Y

    H. Ooguri and Y. Wang,Universal Bounds on CFT Distance Conjecture, arXiv:2405.00674

    work page arXiv

  55. [55]

    Calder´ on-Infante and I

    J. Calder´ on-Infante and I. Valenzuela,Tensionless String Limits in 4d Conformal Manifolds,arXiv:2410.07309

    work page arXiv

  56. [56]

    Exceptional Calabi--Yau spaces: the geometry of $\mathcal{N}=2$ backgrounds with flux

    A. Ashmore and D. Waldram,Exceptional Calabi-Yau spaces: the geometry ofN= 2 backgrounds with flux,Fortsch. Phys.65(2017), no. 1 1600109, [arXiv:1510.00022]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  57. [57]

    Aoufia, I

    C. Aoufia, I. Basile, and G. Leone,Species scale, worldsheet CFTs and emergent geometry,arXiv:2405.03683

    work page arXiv

  58. [58]

    Friedrich, J

    B. Friedrich, J. Monnee, T. Weigand, and M. Wiesner,Emergent Strings in Type IIB Calabi–Yau Compactifications,arXiv:2504.01066

    work page arXiv

  59. [59]

    Backreacted Axion Field Ranges in String Theory

    F. Baume and E. Palti,Backreacted Axion Field Ranges in String Theory,JHEP08 (2016) 043, [arXiv:1602.06517]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  60. [60]

    Super-Planckian Spatial Field Variations and Quantum Gravity

    D. Klaewer and E. Palti,Super-Planckian Spatial Field Variations and Quantum Gravity,JHEP01(2017) 088, [arXiv:1610.00010]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  61. [61]

    Etheredge and B

    M. Etheredge and B. Heidenreich,Geodesic Gradient Flows in Moduli Space, arXiv:2311.18693. 69

    work page arXiv

  62. [62]

    Etheredge, B

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, T. Rudelius, I. Ruiz, and I. Valenzuela,Taxonomy of Infinite Distance Limits,arXiv:2405.20332

    work page arXiv

  63. [63]

    Etheredge,Dense geodesics, tower alignment, and the Sharpened Distance Conjecture,JHEP01(2024) 122, [arXiv:2308.01331]

    M. Etheredge,Dense geodesics, tower alignment, and the Sharpened Distance Conjecture,JHEP01(2024) 122, [arXiv:2308.01331]

    work page arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    EFT strings and dualities in 4d $\mathcal{N}=1$

    A. Grieco, I. Ruiz, and I. Valenzuela,EFT strings and dualities in 4dN= 1, arXiv:2504.16984

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  65. [65]

    Etheredge, B

    M. Etheredge, B. Heidenreich, and T. Rudelius,A Distance Conjecture for Branes, arXiv:2407.20316

    work page arXiv

  66. [66]

    Etheredge,Taxonomy of branes in infinite distance limits,arXiv:2505.10615

    M. Etheredge,Taxonomy of branes in infinite distance limits,arXiv:2505.10615

    work page arXiv

  67. [67]

    Delgado, D

    M. Delgado, D. van de Heisteeg, S. Raman, E. Torres, C. Vafa, and K. Xu,Finiteness and the Emergence of Dualities,arXiv:2412.03640

    work page arXiv

  68. [68]

    G. A. Margulis,Discrete Subgroups of Semisimple Lie Groups, vol. 17 ofErgebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3) [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas (3)]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991

    1991

  69. [69]

    T. W. Grimm, D. Prieto, and M. van Vliet,Tame embeddings, volume growth, and complexity of moduli spaces,Phys. Rev. D112(2025), no. 10 106015, [arXiv:2503.15601]

    work page arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    Cribiori and D

    N. Cribiori and D. Lust,String dualities and modular symmetries in supergravity: a review, 11, 2024

    2024

  71. [71]

    Calder´ on-Infante, A

    J. Calder´ on-Infante, A. M. Uranga, and I. Valenzuela,The Convex Hull Swampland Distance Conjecture and Bounds on Non-geodesics,JHEP03(2021) 299, [arXiv:2012.00034]

    work page arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    B. C. Hall,Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Representations: An Elementary Introduction, vol. 222 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, New York, 2nd ed., 2003

    2003

  73. [73]

    Satake,On representations and compactifications of symmetric riemannian spaces, Annals of Mathematics71(1960), no

    I. Satake,On representations and compactifications of symmetric riemannian spaces, Annals of Mathematics71(1960), no. 1 77–110

    1960

  74. [74]

    Dhillon and A

    G. Dhillon and A. Khare,Faces of highest weight modules and the universal weyl polyhedron,Advances in Mathematics319(2017) 111–152

    2017

  75. [75]

    Gosset,On the regular and semi-regular figures in space of n dimensions,Messenger of Mathematics29(1900) 43–48

    T. Gosset,On the regular and semi-regular figures in space of n dimensions,Messenger of Mathematics29(1900) 43–48

    1900

  76. [76]

    Blind and R

    G. Blind and R. Blind,The semiregular polytopes,Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 66(1991), no. 1 150–154. 70

    1991

  77. [77]

    Niven,Irrational numbers, vol

    I. Niven,Irrational numbers, vol. No. 11 ofThe Carus Mathematical Monographs. Mathematical Association of America, ; distributed by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1956

    1956

  78. [78]

    Berndt and C

    J. Berndt and C. Olmos,The index conjecture for symmetric spaces, 2020

    2020

  79. [79]

    Kollross and A

    A. Kollross and A. Rodr´ ıguez-V´ azquez,Totally geodesic submanifolds in exceptional symmetric spaces,arXiv:2202.10775

    work page arXiv

  80. [80]

    F. I. Karpelevich,Surfaces of transitivity of semisimple group of motions of a symmetric space,Dokl. Akad. Nauk93(1953) 401–404

    1953

Showing first 80 references.