pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.26217 · v1 · pith:ZIWAC2MRnew · submitted 2026-05-25 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP

Dynamical Stability and Habitability in the HD 20794 System

Stephen R. Kane This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 20:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP
keywords exoplanet dynamicshabitable zoneHD 20794N-body simulationseccentric orbitsplanetary stabilitysecular theoryhabitability
0
0 comments X

The pith

The HD 20794 system remains dynamically stable over 10 million years across all tested inclinations, with its eccentric planet d crossing the habitable zone and acting as the dominant habitability influence.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the three confirmed planets around the nearby G-type star HD 20794, focusing on planet d with its minimum mass of about 5.82 Earth masses and eccentricity of 0.45 that carries it through the habitable zone. N-body simulations test orbital evolution at inclinations from 5 to 90 degrees, finding no instability or disruptive encounters over the full 10 million year runs even when planet d's mass rises to roughly 67 Earth masses at the lowest inclination. Secular eccentricity changes follow a shared eigenperiod that shortens as total system mass increases, matching expectations from Laplace-Lagrange theory. A sympathetic reader would care because the system offers a concrete nearby example of how high eccentricity shapes potential surface conditions and rules out additional terrestrial planets.

Core claim

The HD 20794 system remains dynamically stable over the full 10^7 year integration for all tested inclinations, including i = 5° (M_d ≈ 67 M_⊕). The secular eccentricity oscillations share a common eigenperiod that scales inversely with the total system mass, consistent with Laplace-Lagrange secular theory. HD 20794 d is the lowest-mass confirmed planet with e > 0.4 whose orbit crosses the HZ of its host star, and its periastron passage deep within the HZ makes it a likely dynamical disruptor for additional terrestrial planets.

What carries the argument

N-body simulations run across inclinations from 5° to 90° that track long-term orbital stability and secular eccentricity oscillations in the three-planet configuration.

If this is right

  • Planet d spends a measurable fraction of each orbit inside both the conservative and optimistic habitable zone boundaries.
  • The secular interactions produce eccentricity oscillations with a single shared eigenperiod across the planets.
  • The eccentricity of planet d could arise from planet-planet scattering or secular forcing by an unseen outer companion.
  • Planet d is expected to clear or disrupt the orbits of any additional terrestrial planets that might otherwise form in the system.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar nearby systems with eccentric habitable-zone planets may need comparable inclination-dependent stability tests before habitability assessments proceed.
  • Radial-velocity monitoring to exclude additional companions would directly strengthen the no-unseen-planet premise used here.
  • The quantified time planet d spends in the habitable zone could be combined with climate models to estimate surface temperature swings on any hypothetical moons or co-orbiting worlds.
  • Extending the integration length or including general-relativistic effects might reveal slower secular drifts not visible at 10 million years.

Load-bearing premise

The observed minimum masses and orbital elements of the three planets are sufficient to model the system's dynamics without additional unseen planets or significant uncertainties in the parameters affecting the stability conclusions.

What would settle it

An N-body integration to 10^8 years that produces orbital instability or close encounters, or the detection of a fourth planet that induces chaos in the existing configuration, would falsify the reported stability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.26217 by Stephen R. Kane.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: HZ and planetary orbits in the HD 20794 system, where the orbits are labeled by planet designation. The scale of the figure is 2.9 AU along each side. Right: Variation in incident flux received by HD 20794 d during one complete orbit. For both panels, the extent of the HZ is shown in green, where light green and dark green indicate the CHZ and OHZ, respectively. the CHZ, suggesting that on average th… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The true mass of planet d as a function of as￾sumed orbital inclination. The shaded regions indicate the likely planetary nature, including terrestrial, mini-Neptune, and sub-Saturn. The results of the inclination-dependent stability anal￾ysis demonstrate that the HD 20794 system is remark￾ably robust to changes in the assumed planetary masses. For all tested inclinations, from i = 90◦ (Md ≈ 5.82 M⊕) down … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Eccentricity evolution for the three known planets of the HD 20794 system for the inclination case of i = 90◦ . Data are shown for the full 107 year integration. stant throughout the 107 year integrations at all tested inclinations, with variations of less than ∼0.01%. This is consistent with the conservation of semi-major axes in Laplace-Lagrange secular theory, where only the ec￾centricities and longitud… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The dominant secular eigenperiod of the ec￾centricity oscillations as a function of total planet mass for the HD 20794 system. The red dashed line shows the Psec ∝ 1/Mtotal scaling predicted by Laplace-Lagrange sec￾ular theory, which matches the simulation results to within 0.7%. reported by Nari et al. (2025) at all tested inclinations. The near-constancy of these amplitudes across the mass range is a con… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The mass and semi-major axis of an additional planet in a circular orbit whose angular momentum equals the angular momentum deficit (AMD) for the HD 20794 sys￾tem, and may have been previously ejected from the system. The dots indicate the minimum masses and semi-major axes of the known planets in the system. event that resulted in the present system architecture (Kane et al. 2023). The concentration of th… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Projected and angular separation of HD 20794 d from the host star, assuming inclinations of i = 90◦ (left) and i = 0◦ (right). An orbital phase of zero corresponds to the location of superior conjunction. 2022b; Fujii et al. 2018). The combination of HWO reflected-light and LIFE thermal-emission observations would provide a comprehensive atmospheric characteri￾zation of planet d (Fujii et al. 2018; Catling… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Keplerian orbit of a terrestrial planet can be a significant driver in the evolution of surface conditions, as well as influencing the overall dynamics of the system. The HD 20794 system harbors three confirmed planets orbiting a nearby G-type star, including HD 20794 d, a $\sim$5.82 $M_\oplus$ (minimum mass) planet on a highly eccentric ($e = 0.45$) orbit that passes through the Habitable Zone (HZ). Here, we present a dynamical analysis of the HD 20794 system. We calculate the HZ boundaries and quantify the fraction of the orbital period that planet d spends within the conservative and optimistic HZ limits. Using N-body simulations, we explore the long-term orbital stability across inclinations spanning $\sim$5--90\degr. The system remains dynamically stable over the full $10^7$ year integration for all tested inclinations, including $i = 5\degr$ ($M_d \approx 67$ $M_\oplus$). The secular eccentricity oscillations share a common eigenperiod that scales inversely with the total system mass, consistent with Laplace-Lagrange secular theory. We examine the origin of the eccentricity of planet d, including planet-planet scattering and secular excitation from an unseen eccentric outer companion. HD 20794 d is the lowest-mass confirmed planet with $e > 0.4$ whose orbit crosses the HZ of its host star, and its periastron passage deep within the HZ makes it a likely dynamical disruptor for additional terrestrial planets, reinforcing its status as the dominant habitability prospect in the system. The proximity of HD 20794 and its inclusion on the Habitable Worlds Observatory precursor target list make this a high-priority system for understanding the interplay between orbital dynamics and planetary habitability.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that the HD 20794 three-planet system remains dynamically stable over 10^7 yr N-body integrations for all tested inclinations (5°–90°), including the high-mass i=5° case (M_d≈67 M_⊕), with secular eccentricity oscillations matching Laplace-Lagrange theory; planet d (e=0.45) is identified as the lowest-mass confirmed planet with e>0.4 whose orbit crosses the HZ, acting as a dynamical disruptor and making the system a high-priority target for habitability studies.

Significance. If the stability result is robust, the work supplies a concrete nearby-system example of the interplay between high-eccentricity orbits, HZ crossing, and long-term dynamical stability, with explicit credit due for the direct comparison of N-body secular periods to analytic Laplace-Lagrange predictions. The identification of HD 20794 d as the lowest-mass e>0.4 HZ-crossing planet is a falsifiable claim that strengthens the paper’s relevance to Habitable Worlds Observatory target selection.

major comments (2)
  1. [N-body stability analysis] N-body stability section: stability at all inclinations, including i=5° (M_d≈67 M_⊕), is shown only for single integrations that adopt the fixed best-fit Keplerian elements; no Monte Carlo draws from the observational posterior or tests with injected unseen companions are reported. At elevated masses the secular forcing and close-encounter timescales shorten, so a modest shift in a or e within the reported 1σ errors can move the system across a stability boundary that the nominal runs do not probe.
  2. [HZ and habitability discussion] HZ-crossing and habitability section: the claim that planet d is “the lowest-mass confirmed planet with e>0.4 whose orbit crosses the HZ” rests on the nominal minimum mass and eccentricity; without posterior sampling it is unclear whether the conclusion survives the full uncertainty range of the orbital fit.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the fraction of the orbital period spent in the conservative and optimistic HZ is quantified, but the corresponding numerical values and integration details are not referenced to a table or figure in the provided text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which highlight important aspects of robustness in the dynamical analysis. We agree that Monte Carlo sampling from the observational posterior would strengthen the stability and habitability claims, and we will incorporate such tests in the revised manuscript. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [N-body stability analysis] N-body stability section: stability at all inclinations, including i=5° (M_d≈67 M_⊕), is shown only for single integrations that adopt the fixed best-fit Keplerian elements; no Monte Carlo draws from the observational posterior or tests with injected unseen companions are reported. At elevated masses the secular forcing and close-encounter timescales shorten, so a modest shift in a or e within the reported 1σ errors can move the system across a stability boundary that the nominal runs do not probe.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the presented N-body results rely on single integrations using the nominal best-fit elements. The agreement between the simulated secular periods and Laplace-Lagrange analytic predictions offers supporting evidence independent of the specific numerical realizations. To address the concern directly, the revised manuscript will include Monte Carlo draws from the observational posterior, with multiple integrations sampling a and e within 1σ uncertainties, focused on the high-mass i=5° case. Tests with injected unseen companions are not performed because no evidence for additional planets exists in the current data; we will note this as a limitation rather than a required extension of the three-planet analysis. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [HZ and habitability discussion] HZ-crossing and habitability section: the claim that planet d is “the lowest-mass confirmed planet with e>0.4 whose orbit crosses the HZ” rests on the nominal minimum mass and eccentricity; without posterior sampling it is unclear whether the conclusion survives the full uncertainty range of the orbital fit.

    Authors: The identification uses the published minimum mass (~5.82 M_⊕) and e=0.45. While posterior sampling would provide a more complete assessment, the nominal values lie well inside the reported 1σ uncertainties, and no other confirmed planet satisfies the low-mass, high-eccentricity, HZ-crossing criteria. In revision we will add a short check confirming that the conclusion remains unchanged when parameters are varied within their 1σ ranges. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; standard N-body application to fixed inputs

full rationale

The paper's central stability result follows from direct N-body integrations over 10^7 years using the reported best-fit Keplerian elements and masses at each tested inclination. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, nor does any load-bearing claim rest on a self-citation chain or imported uniqueness theorem; the secular eigenperiod comparison is to standard Laplace-Lagrange theory. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external dynamical benchmarks and receives the default non-finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard assumptions of celestial mechanics and the accuracy of the input orbital parameters from observations.

free parameters (1)
  • planetary masses and eccentricities
    Taken from observational data as inputs to the model.
axioms (2)
  • standard math The planets interact only through Newtonian gravity in a multi-body system
    Basis for N-body simulations.
  • domain assumption The system has no additional undetected planets significantly affecting the dynamics
    Implicit in the stability analysis of the known planets.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5856 in / 1152 out tokens · 38918 ms · 2026-06-29T20:16:24.823978+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 87 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P., Konrad, B

    Alei, E., Quanz, S. P., Konrad, B. S., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A245, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450320

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450320 2024

  2. [2]

    R., & Lai, D

    Anderson, K. R., & Lai, D. 2017, MNRAS, 472, 3692, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2250

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2250 2017

  3. [3]

    2014, MNRAS, 437, 3473, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2146

    Pollacco, D. 2014, MNRAS, 437, 3473, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2146

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2146 2014

  4. [4]

    Barnes, R., & Raymond, S. N. 2004, ApJ, 617, 569, doi: 10.1086/423419

    work page doi:10.1086/423419 2004

  5. [5]

    2024, MNRAS, 530, 4300, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1124

    Biasiotti, L., Simonetti, P., Vladilo, G., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 530, 4300, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1124

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1124 2024

  6. [6]

    M., et al

    Blunt, S., Endl, M., Weiss, L. M., et al. 2019, AJ, 158, 181, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab3e63

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab3e63 2019

  7. [7]

    2018, ApJL, 867, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aae710

    Foreman-Mackey, D. 2018, ApJL, 867, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aae710

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aae710 2018

  8. [8]

    A., Bizzarro, M., Latham, D

    Buchhave, L. A., Bizzarro, M., Latham, D. W., et al. 2014, Nature, 509, 593, doi: 10.1038/nature13254

    work page doi:10.1038/nature13254 2014

  9. [9]

    N., & Davies, M

    Carrera, D., Raymond, S. N., & Davies, M. B. 2019, A&A, 629, L7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935744

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935744 2019

  10. [10]

    C., Krissansen-Totton, J., Kiang, N

    Catling, D. C., Krissansen-Totton, J., Kiang, N. Y., et al. 2018, Astrobiology, 18, 709, doi: 10.1089/ast.2017.1737

    work page doi:10.1089/ast.2017.1737 2018

  11. [11]

    Chambers, J. E. 1999, MNRAS, 304, 793, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02379.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02379.x 1999

  12. [12]

    E., Wetherill, G

    Chambers, J. E., Wetherill, G. W., & Boss, A. P. 1996, Icarus, 119, 261, doi: 10.1006/icar.1996.0019

    work page doi:10.1006/icar.1996.0019 1996

  13. [13]

    B., Matsumura, S., & Rasio, F

    Chatterjee, S., Ford, E. B., Matsumura, S., & Rasio, F. A. 2008, ApJ, 686, 580, doi: 10.1086/590227

    work page doi:10.1086/590227 2008

  14. [14]

    2017, ApJ, 834, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/17

    Chen, J., & Kipping, D. 2017, ApJ, 834, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/17

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/17 2017

  15. [15]

    2023, A&A, 678, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347232 12 Stephen R

    Cretignier, M., Dumusque, X., Aigrain, S., & Pepe, F. 2023, A&A, 678, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347232 12 Stephen R. Kane

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347232 2023

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    Cumming, A. 2004, MNRAS, 354, 1165, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08275.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08275.x 2004

  17. [17]

    M., et al

    Damasso, M., Perger, M., Almenara, J. M., et al. 2022, A&A, 666, A187, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243522

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243522 2022

  18. [18]

    2007, A&A, 473, 983, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078144

    Mayor, M. 2007, A&A, 473, 983, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078144

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078144 2007

  19. [19]

    Raymond, S. N. 2010, ApJ, 721, 1295, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/721/2/1295

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/721/2/1295 2010

  20. [20]

    Feng, F., Tuomi, M., & Jones, H. R. A. 2017, A&A, 605, A103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730406

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730406 2017

  21. [21]

    Ford, E. B. 2008, AJ, 135, 1008, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/135/3/1008 —. 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 111, 12616, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1304219111

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/135/3/1008 2008

  22. [22]

    B., & Rasio, F

    Ford, E. B., & Rasio, F. A. 2008, ApJ, 686, 621, doi: 10.1086/590926

    work page doi:10.1086/590926 2008

  23. [23]

    2018, Astrobiology, 18, 739, doi: 10.1089/ast.2017.1733

    Fujii, Y., Angerhausen, D., Deitrick, R., et al. 2018, Astrobiology, 18, 739, doi: 10.1089/ast.2017.1733

    work page doi:10.1089/ast.2017.1733 2018

  24. [24]

    1993, Icarus, 106, 247, doi: 10.1006/icar.1993.1169

    Gladman, B. 1993, Icarus, 106, 247, doi: 10.1006/icar.1993.1169

    work page doi:10.1006/icar.1993.1169 1993

  25. [25]

    K., Dressing, C

    Harada, C. K., Dressing, C. D., Kane, S. R., & Ardestani, B. A. 2024, ApJS, 272, 30, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad3e81

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad3e81 2024

  26. [26]

    L., Bott, K., Dalba, P

    Hill, M. L., Bott, K., Dalba, P. A., et al. 2023, AJ, 165, 34, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aca1c0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aca1c0 2023

  27. [27]

    L., Kane, S

    Hill, M. L., Kane, S. R., Seperuelo Duarte, E., et al. 2018, ApJ, 860, 67, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac384

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac384 2018

  28. [28]

    2023, A&A, 674, A10, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244161

    Holl, B., Sozzetti, A., Sahlmann, J., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A10, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244161

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244161 2023

  29. [29]

    R., Marshall, J

    Horner, J., Kane, S. R., Marshall, J. P., et al. 2020, PASP, 132, 102001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab8eb9 Juri´ c, M., & Tremaine, S. 2008, ApJ, 686, 603, doi: 10.1086/590047

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ab8eb9 2020

  30. [30]

    Kane, S. R. 2007, MNRAS, 380, 1488, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12144.x —. 2013, ApJ, 766, 10, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/766/1/10 —. 2015, ApJL, 814, L9, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/814/1/L9 —. 2023, AJ, 166, 187, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acfb01 —. 2025, AJ, 170, 329, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ae17c9

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12144.x 2007

  31. [31]

    R., & Blunt, S

    Kane, S. R., & Blunt, S. 2019, AJ, 158, 209, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab4c3e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab4c3e 2019

  32. [32]

    R., & Burt, J

    Kane, S. R., & Burt, J. A. 2024, AJ, 168, 279, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad8a68

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad8a68 2024

  33. [33]

    , keywords =

    Kane, S. R., Ciardi, D. R., Gelino, D. M., & von Braun, K. 2012, MNRAS, 425, 757, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21627.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21627.x 2012

  34. [34]

    R., & Fetherolf, T

    Kane, S. R., & Fetherolf, T. 2023, AJ, 166, 205, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acff5a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac 2023

  35. [35]

    R., & Gelino, D

    Kane, S. R., & Gelino, D. M. 2012, Astrobiology, 12, 940, doi: 10.1089/ast.2011.0798

    work page doi:10.1089/ast.2011.0798 2012

  36. [36]

    Harada, C. K. 2024, AJ, 168, 195, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad6a50

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad6a50 2024

  37. [37]

    R., Li, Z., Wolf, E

    Kane, S. R., Li, Z., Wolf, E. T., Ostberg, C., & Hill, M. L. 2021a, AJ, 161, 31, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abcbfd

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abcbfd

  38. [38]

    R., & Raymond, S

    Kane, S. R., & Raymond, S. N. 2014, ApJ, 784, 104, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/784/2/104

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/784/2/104 2014

  39. [39]

    R., & Torres, S

    Kane, S. R., & Torres, S. M. 2017, AJ, 154, 204, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa8fce

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa8fce 2017

  40. [40]

    R., Dalba, P

    Kane, S. R., Dalba, P. A., Li, Z., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 252, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab1ddf

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab1ddf 2019

  41. [41]

    R., Arney, G

    Kane, S. R., Arney, G. N., Byrne, P. K., et al. 2021b, Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 126, e06643, doi: 10.1002/jgre.v126.2

    work page doi:10.1002/jgre.v126.2

  42. [42]

    R., Foley, B

    Kane, S. R., Foley, B. J., Hill, M. L., et al. 2022, AJ, 163, 20, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac366b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac366b 2022

  43. [43]

    R., Hill, M

    Kane, S. R., Hill, M. L., Dalba, P. A., et al. 2023, AJ, 165, 252, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acd17a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acd17a 2023

  44. [44]

    M., Matr` a, L., Marmier, M., et al

    Kennedy, G. M., Matr` a, L., Marmier, M., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 3121, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv511

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv511 2015

  45. [45]

    K., & Barnes, R

    Kopparapu, R. K., & Barnes, R. 2010, ApJ, 716, 1336, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/716/2/1336

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/716/2/1336 2010

  46. [46]

    K., Ramirez, R

    Kopparapu, R. K., Ramirez, R. M., SchottelKotte, J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 787, L29, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/787/2/L29

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/787/2/l29 2014

  47. [47]

    K., Ramirez, R., Kasting, J

    Kopparapu, R. K., Ramirez, R., Kasting, J. F., et al. 2013, ApJ, 765, 131, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/765/2/131

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/765/2/131 2013

  48. [48]

    K., H´ ebrard, E., Belikov, R., et al

    Kopparapu, R. K., H´ ebrard, E., Belikov, R., et al. 2018, ApJ, 856, 122, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab205

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab205 2018

  49. [49]

    A., Mamajek, E

    Laliotis, K., Burt, J. A., Mamajek, E. E., et al. 2023, AJ, 165, 176, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acc067

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acc067 2023

  50. [50]

    1997, A&A, 317, L75 —

    Laskar, J. 1997, A&A, 317, L75 —. 2008, Icarus, 196, 1, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2008.02.017

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2008.02.017 1997

  51. [51]

    Laskar, J., & Petit, A. C. 2017, A&A, 605, A72, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201630022

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201630022 2017

  52. [52]

    2004, A&A, 428, 261, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041335

    Laskar, J., Robutel, P., Joutel, F., et al. 2004, A&A, 428, 261, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041335

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041335 2004

  53. [53]

    2013, Nature, 504, 268, doi: 10.1038/nature12827

    Pottier, A. 2013, Nature, 504, 268, doi: 10.1038/nature12827

    work page doi:10.1038/nature12827 2013

  54. [54]

    Lunine, J. I. 2017, Acta Astronautica, 131, 123, doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.11.017

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.11.017 2017

  55. [55]

    2022, Science, 377, 1211, doi: 10.1126/science.abl7164

    Luque, R., & Pall´ e, E. 2022, Science, 377, 1211, doi: 10.1126/science.abl7164

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abl7164 2022

  56. [56]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2402.12414, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2402.12414

    Mamajek, E., & Stapelfeldt, K. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2402.12414, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2402.12414

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.12414 2024

  57. [57]

    2023a, A&A, 670, A68, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243751 Dynamical Stability and Habitability in the HD 20794 System 13 —

    Mishra, L., Alibert, Y., Udry, S., & Mordasini, C. 2023a, A&A, 670, A68, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243751 Dynamical Stability and Habitability in the HD 20794 System 13 —. 2023b, A&A, 670, A69, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244705 M¨ uller, S., Baron, J., Helled, R., Bouchy, F., & Parc, L. 2024, A&A, 686, A296, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348690

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243751 2024

  58. [58]

    D., & Dermott, S

    Murray, C. D., & Dermott, S. F. 1999, Solar System Dynamics (Cambridge University Press), doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139174817

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174817 1999

  59. [59]

    2008, ApJ, 678, 498, doi: 10.1086/529369

    Nagasawa, M., Ida, S., & Bessho, T. 2008, ApJ, 678, 498, doi: 10.1086/529369

    work page doi:10.1086/529369 2008

  60. [60]

    2013, MNRAS, 431, 2155, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt302

    Teyssandier, J. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 2155, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt302

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt302 2013

  61. [61]

    C., et al

    Nari, N., Dumusque, X., Hara, N. C., et al. 2025, A&A, 693, A297, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451769

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451769 2025

  62. [62]

    F., Bouchy, F., & Helled, R

    Otegi, J. F., Bouchy, F., & Helled, R. 2020, A&A, 634, A43, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936482

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936482 2020

  63. [63]

    2011, A&A, 534, A58, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117055

    Pepe, F., Lovis, C., S´ egransan, D., et al. 2011, A&A, 534, A58, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117055

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117055 2011

  64. [64]

    ´A., & Lindegren, L

    Perryman, M., Hartman, J., Bakos, G. ´A., & Lindegren, L. 2014, ApJ, 797, 14, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/797/1/14

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/797/1/14 2014

  65. [65]

    C., Laskar, J., & Bou´ e, G

    Petit, A. C., Laskar, J., & Bou´ e, G. 2017, A&A, 607, A35, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731196

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731196 2017

  66. [66]

    2015, ApJ, 805, 75, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/75

    Petrovich, C. 2015, ApJ, 805, 75, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/75

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/805/1/75 2015

  67. [67]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Petrovich, C., Malhotra, R., & Tremaine, S. 2013, ApJ, 770, 24, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/24

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/770/1/24 2013

  68. [68]

    P., et al

    Quanz, S. P., Ottiger, M., Fontanet, E., et al. 2022a, A&A, 664, A21, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140366

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140366

  69. [69]

    P., Absil, O., Benz, W., et al

    Quanz, S. P., Absil, O., Benz, W., et al. 2022b, Experimental Astronomy, 54, 1197, doi: 10.1007/s10686-021-09791-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s10686-021-09791-z

  70. [70]

    A., & Ford, E

    Rasio, F. A., & Ford, E. B. 1996, Science, 274, 954, doi: 10.1126/science.274.5289.954

    work page doi:10.1126/science.274.5289.954 1996

  71. [71]

    N., Armitage, P

    Raymond, S. N., Armitage, P. J., & Gorelick, N. 2009a, ApJL, 699, L88, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/L88

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/699/2/l88

  72. [72]

    N., O’Brien, D

    Raymond, S. N., O’Brien, D. P., Morbidelli, A., & Kaib, N. A. 2009b, Icarus, 203, 644, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2009.05.016

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2009.05.016 2009

  73. [73]

    2014, Science, 345, 440, doi: 10.1126/science.1253253

    Robertson, P., Mahadevan, S., Endl, M., & Roy, A. 2014, Science, 345, 440, doi: 10.1126/science.1253253

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1253253 2014

  74. [74]

    Rogers, L. A. 2015, ApJ, 801, 41, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/801/1/41

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/801/1/41 2015

  75. [75]

    W., Kiang, N

    Schwieterman, E. W., Kiang, N. Y., Parenteau, M. N., et al. 2018, Astrobiology, 18, 663, doi: 10.1089/ast.2017.1729

    work page doi:10.1089/ast.2017.1729 2018

  76. [76]

    Shen, Y., & Turner, E. L. 2008, ApJ, 685, 553, doi: 10.1086/590548

    work page doi:10.1086/590548 2008

  77. [77]

    L., Barnes, R., Agol, E., et al

    Shields, A. L., Barnes, R., Agol, E., et al. 2016, Astrobiology, 16, 443, doi: 10.1089/ast.2015.1353 Stef´ ansson, G., Mahadevan, S., Winn, J. N., et al. 2025, AJ, 169, 107, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ada9e1

    work page doi:10.1089/ast.2015.1353 2016

  78. [78]

    W., Stark, C

    Tuchow, N. W., Stark, C. C., & Mamajek, E. 2024, AJ, 167, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad25ec Van Eylen, V., & Albrecht, S. 2015, ApJ, 808, 126, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/808/2/126

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad25ec 2024

  79. [79]

    J., & Georgakarakos, N

    Way, M. J., & Georgakarakos, N. 2017, ApJ, 835, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/835/1/L1

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/835/1/l1 2017

  80. [80]

    J., Ostberg, C., Foley, B

    Way, M. J., Ostberg, C., Foley, B. J., et al. 2023, SSRv, 219, 13, doi: 10.1007/s11214-023-00953-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-023-00953-3 2023

Showing first 80 references.