Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 102 references

Metastable emission dynamics in few-level systems improve continuous quantum sensing depending on detection efficiency.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-29 17:02 UTC pith:TQW7B4XN

load-bearing objection Intermittency gives sensing robustness to low detection efficiency while dark states only win at perfect efficiency but fail with losses. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2605.26923 v1 pith:TQW7B4XN submitted 2026-05-26 quant-ph

Intermittency and metastable dark states as a resource for continuous sensing

Robert Mattes , Igor Lesanovsky , Albert Cabot This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords quantum sensingcontinuous monitoringemission intermittencydark statesFisher informationtrapped ionsmetastable dynamicsopen quantum systems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that competing coherent couplings and dissipative processes in few-level open quantum systems generate metastable dynamics, either as intermittent emission with alternating bright and dark periods or as dark states. These dynamics serve as a resource for continuous sensing of intrinsic parameters by monitoring emitted quanta. Intermittent emission achieves robustness to inefficient detection and dephasing, whereas dark states provide higher sensitivity only at unit detection efficiency but are vulnerable to losses. The impact is quantified via Fisher information of the emission record, benchmarked against the joint system-environment sensitivity, with practical estimators shown to approach the bound.

Core claim

In few-level systems where coherent couplings compete with dissipative processes, the resulting metastable dynamics—characterized by emission intermittency with long bright and dark periods or by the emergence of a dark state—can be exploited for continuous sensing. Intermittent emission provides robustness with respect to inefficient detection and dephasing, while dark states yield significantly higher sensitivity at unit detection efficiency, although they are highly susceptible to losses. The classical Fisher information extracted from the emission record quantifies this performance, which is benchmarked against the ultimate sensitivity in the joint system-environment state, and maximum-l

What carries the argument

Metastable dynamics from competition between coherent couplings and dissipative processes, manifesting as emission intermittency or dark states, quantified via classical Fisher information of the emission record.

Load-bearing premise

Few-level systems can be realized in which coherent couplings and dissipative processes compete to produce controllable metastable dynamics of intermittency or dark states.

What would settle it

An experiment measuring classical Fisher information from emission records at varying detection efficiencies that checks whether intermittency sustains higher information than dark states at low efficiency and the reverse at unit efficiency.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Intermittent emission enables sensing that remains effective even with inefficient detectors and in the presence of dephasing.
  • Dark states achieve higher sensitivity than intermittent cases when every emitted quantum is detected, but performance drops sharply with any losses.
  • Maximum-likelihood estimators applied to the emission record can closely approach the sensitivity limit set by the full quantum state.
  • The approach applies to trapped-ion systems and extends to other platforms exhibiting similar emission dynamics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Designing sensors to operate in the intermittent regime could allow reliable parameter estimation in environments with high photon loss, such as in vivo biological measurements.
  • Exploring hybrid protocols that switch between intermittency and dark-state regimes based on real-time detection efficiency estimates might optimize performance dynamically.
  • The results suggest potential for using similar metastable features in other quantum information tasks like state preparation or error mitigation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper examines few-level open quantum systems where coherent couplings compete with dissipation to produce either emission intermittency (alternating long bright/dark periods) or a metastable dark state. It claims that intermittency confers robustness to inefficient detection and dephasing for continuous sensing, while dark states yield higher sensitivity only at unit detection efficiency but degrade rapidly with losses. Performance is quantified via the classical Fisher information extracted from the observed emission record, benchmarked against the ultimate sensitivity available from the joint system-environment state; maximum-likelihood estimators are shown to approach this bound. The analysis is specialized to trapped-ion realizations but stated to generalize.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work supplies a concrete, experimentally relevant distinction between two classes of metastable dynamics as resources for realistic continuous sensing under lossy detection. The explicit use of the classical Fisher information on the emission trajectory, together with the direct benchmark to the joint-state quantum limit and the demonstration that standard maximum-likelihood estimators saturate it, constitutes a strength; these are standard but cleanly executed tools that make the robustness claims falsifiable.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.2, Eq. (17)] §4.2, Eq. (17): the classical Fisher information for the intermittent regime is computed under an effective two-state telegraph model; the paper does not quantify the separation-of-timescales condition (ratio of bright/dark dwell times to the inverse detection rate) required for the approximation to remain accurate when detection efficiency drops below ~0.3, which is load-bearing for the robustness claim.
  2. [§5, Fig. 4] §5, Fig. 4: the comparison of sensitivity versus detection efficiency shows the dark-state advantage disappearing below η≈0.8, yet the dephasing robustness for the intermittent case is demonstrated only for a single dephasing rate; a systematic scan over dephasing strength relative to the coherent coupling would be needed to substantiate the stated superiority under realistic trapped-ion conditions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2 and §4] The notation for the emission record (binary bright/dark versus photon-counting) is introduced inconsistently between §2 and §4; a single definition with explicit mapping to the detection efficiency η would improve readability.
  2. [Table 1] Table 1 lists the master-equation parameters for the trapped-ion example but omits the numerical values of the coherent Rabi frequencies used in the intermittency regime; these should be stated explicitly to allow reproduction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address the two major points below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarifications and additional analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.2, Eq. (17)] §4.2, Eq. (17): the classical Fisher information for the intermittent regime is computed under an effective two-state telegraph model; the paper does not quantify the separation-of-timescales condition (ratio of bright/dark dwell times to the inverse detection rate) required for the approximation to remain accurate when detection efficiency drops below ~0.3, which is load-bearing for the robustness claim.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit statement of the separation-of-timescales condition is needed to support the robustness claim at low detection efficiency. In the revised version we will add a paragraph in §4.2 that derives the required ratio of bright/dark dwell times to the inverse detection rate for the telegraph approximation to remain accurate (within a stated error tolerance) down to η ≈ 0.3. A short numerical validation confirming the regime of validity will also be included. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5, Fig. 4] §5, Fig. 4: the comparison of sensitivity versus detection efficiency shows the dark-state advantage disappearing below η≈0.8, yet the dephasing robustness for the intermittent case is demonstrated only for a single dephasing rate; a systematic scan over dephasing strength relative to the coherent coupling would be needed to substantiate the stated superiority under realistic trapped-ion conditions.

    Authors: The dephasing rate used in the original Fig. 4 is representative of current trapped-ion experiments, but we acknowledge that a broader scan would strengthen the comparison. We will add a new panel (or supplementary figure) in §5 that systematically varies the dephasing strength relative to the coherent coupling for both the intermittent and dark-state regimes, thereby confirming the claimed superiority across the relevant experimental range. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain consists of standard open-quantum-system calculations: the classical Fisher information extracted from the photon emission record, its comparison to the ultimate sensitivity encoded in the joint system-environment state, and the performance of maximum-likelihood estimators. These quantities are defined and computed directly from the Lindblad master equation and the observed jump process without any fitted parameters being renamed as predictions, without self-definitional loops, and without load-bearing self-citations. The metastability (intermittency or dark states) is obtained from competing coherent and dissipative terms in few-level systems, which is an independent dynamical feature rather than an input that is redefined as output. No step reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no identifiable free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; insufficient information to populate ledger entries.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5725 in / 1089 out tokens · 45570 ms · 2026-06-29T17:02:28.920483+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Quanta emitted by an open quantum system carry information about intrinsic parameters, enabling their estimation via continuous monitoring. In practice, however, only a fraction of the emitted quanta is detected, reducing the achievable sensitivity. Here, we consider few-level systems in which coherent couplings and dissipative processes compete, producing metastable dynamics characterized by emission intermittency or by the emergence of a dark state. We show that both phenomena can be beneficial for sensing but their relative performance depends strongly on the achievable detection efficiencies. Intermittent emission, marked by long alternating bright and dark periods, allows to achieve robustness with respect to inefficient detection and dephasing, whereas dark states yield significantly higher sensitivity at unit detection efficiency. Yet the latter are highly susceptible to losses. We quantify the impact of inefficient detection through the classical Fisher information of the emission record and benchmark it against the ultimate sensitivity encoded in the joint system-environment state. Finally, we demonstrate that maximum-likelihood estimators based on the observed emission record can effectively approach this sensitivity. We focus here on trapped-ion systems, however, the results extend to other quantum platforms in which similar emission dynamics can be observed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.26923 by Albert Cabot, Igor Lesanovsky, Robert Mattes.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a)] does not significantly depend on Ωd (see also Appendix C). In contrast, the FI at non-perfect detection efficiency, ηg < 1, does, as indicated by the significantly larger value for Ωd/Ωe = 0.0025 compared to the one for Ωd/Ωe = 0.01, see blue and red solid line in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (b). Further, we observe that the slope with which the FI rate decreases with ηg → 0 generally also increases with the enhancement found for unit detection efficiency. The decreasing FI rate shows that the enhanced sensitiv￾ity in Setup 2 compared to Setup 1 is indeed not simply related to long waiting times occurring more often, which we observe for decreasing ηg. By recalling Eq. (12), we explicitly see … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (b) (solid black broken lines), showing excellent agreement already for ηg = 0.1. Its accuracy relies on a clear separation of timescales between the characteris￾tic detection times within a bright period and the much slower switching between bright and dark periods, i.e., Γ1 ≫ Γ2 and p ≪ 1. The same condition applies to the four-level blinking system, where one simply adapts the expressions for Γ1, Γ2 and… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: ]. Hence, the evolution between two jumps shows sustained oscillations over a large timescale. By taking also interference terms between the inner products asso￾ciated to the dark and bright subspace into account one interpolates between them and perfectly recovers the nu￾merical solution for all times. 2. Waiting time distribution In the following section, we will firstly discuss differ￾ences between W′ … view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_14.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The relevant parameter regime for us is Ω d ≪Ω e, γg, while we also assume the strongly fluorescent transition to be far from saturation such that Ω e < γg/4

    Unit detection efficiency Beginning with the case of unit detection efficiency, it is sufficient to consider the effective Hamiltonian Heff =H−i γg 2 |e⟩⟨e|,(B3) which we study using perturbation theory. The relevant parameter regime for us is Ω d ≪Ω e, γg, while we also assume the strongly fluorescent transition to be far from saturation such that Ω e < ...

  2. [2]

    Nevertheless, as we show below, the results ofη g = 1 are still useful in help- ing us to build an accurate ansatz forW(τ)

    Inefficient detection In the case ofη g <1 we are not able to pursue a systematic perturbative expansion. Nevertheless, as we show below, the results ofη g = 1 are still useful in help- ing us to build an accurate ansatz forW(τ). In order to do so, we first compute numericallyW(τ) and analyze its behavior as we decreaseη g and for Ω d/Ωe = 0.0025, see Fig...

  3. [3]

    Unit detection efficiency in both channels Analog to the blinking system (Setup 1) we make use of a non-Hermitian perturbation theory in order to find analytical expressions for the characteristic features of the WTD observed before, see Sec. V A. In contrast to the case studied in Appendix B we explicitly have to consider all decay channels and assumeη g...

  4. [4]

    Waiting time distribution In the following section, we will firstly discuss differ- ences betweenW ′(τ) (η g =η u = 1) and the waiting time distributionW(τ) (η g = 1, ηu = 0) [cf. Fig. 10(b)]. In a second step we study howW(τ) changes with inefficient detectionη g ≪1, see Fig. 4(b). 16 FIG. 11.Spectral decomposition ofL 0 for Setup 2. (a) Eigenvalues of t...

  5. [5]

    Dephasing In this section, we present and discuss the impact of dephasing to the enhanced sensitivity observed in the case of Setup 2. The results derived in the context of the perturbation ansatz show that the oscillations emerging on an interme- diate timescale rely on coherences between the dark state |D⟩and the|d⟩-level. Thus, the latter and consequen...

  6. [6]

    J. G. Bohnet, Z. Chen, J. M. Weiner, D. Meiser, M. J. Holland, and J. K. Thompson, A steady-state superradi- ant laser with less than one intracavity photon, Nature 484, 78 (2012)

    2012

  7. [7]

    Ferioli, A

    G. Ferioli, A. Glicenstein, I. Ferrier-Barbut, and A. Browaeys, A non-equilibrium superradiant phase tran- sition in free space, Nat. Phys.19, 1345 (2023)

    2023

  8. [8]

    T. E. Lee, H. H¨ affner, and M. C. Cross, Collective quan- tum jumps of Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 023602 (2012)

    2012

  9. [9]

    C. Ates, B. Olmos, J. P. Garrahan, and I. Lesanovsky, Dynamical phases and intermittency of the dissipative quantum Ising model, Phys. Rev. A85, 043620 (2012)

    2012

  10. [10]

    D.-S. Ding, H. Busche, B.-S. Shi, G.-C. Guo, and C. S. Adams, Phase diagram and self-organizing dynamics in a thermal ensemble of strongly interacting Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. X10, 021023 (2020)

    2020

  11. [11]

    Liu, K.-H

    Z.-K. Liu, K.-H. Sun, A. Cabot, F. Carollo, J. Zhang, Z.- Y. Zhang, L.-H. Zhang, B. Liu, T.-Y. Han, Q. Li, Y. Ma, H.-C. Chen, I. Lesanovsky, D.-S. Ding, and B.-S. Shi, Emergence of subharmonics in a microwave driven dissi- pative Rydberg gas, Phys. Rev. Res.6, L032069 (2024)

    2024

  12. [12]

    Kongkhambut, J

    P. Kongkhambut, J. Skulte, L. Mathey, J. G. Cosme, A. Hemmerich, and H. Keßler, Observation of a continu- ous time crystal, Science377, 670 (2022)

    2022

  13. [13]

    Solanki, M

    P. Solanki, M. Krishna, M. Hajduˇ sek, C. Bruder, and S. Vinjanampathy, Exotic synchronization in continuous time crystals outside the symmetric subspace, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 260403 (2024)

    2024

  14. [14]

    Russo and T

    F. Russo and T. Pohl, Quantum dissipative continuous time crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 110404 (2025)

    2025

  15. [15]

    Z. Wang, R. Gao, X. Wu, B. Buˇ ca, K. Mølmer, L. You, and F. Yang, Boundary time crystals induced by local dissipation and long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 230401 (2025)

    2025

  16. [16]

    Montenegro, C

    V. Montenegro, C. Mukhopadhyay, R. Yousefjani, S. Sarkar, U. Mishra, M. G. Paris, and A. Bayat, Re- view: Quantum metrology and sensing with many-body systems, Phys. Rep.1134, 1 (2025)

    2025

  17. [17]

    Macieszczak, M

    K. Macieszczak, M. Gut ¸˘ a, I. Lesanovsky, and J. P. Gar- rahan, Dynamical phase transitions as a resource for quantum enhanced metrology, Phys. Rev. A93, 022103 (2016)

    2016

  18. [18]

    Ilias, D

    T. Ilias, D. Yang, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Criticality-enhanced quantum sensing via continuous measurement, PRX Quantum3, 010354 (2022)

    2022

  19. [19]

    Montenegro, M

    V. Montenegro, M. G. Genoni, A. Bayat, and M. G. Paris, Quantum metrology with boundary time crystals, Commun. Phys.6, 304 (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    Di Candia, F

    R. Di Candia, F. Minganti, K. Petrovnin, G. Paraoanu, and S. Felicetti, Critical parametric quantum sensing, npj Quantum Inf.9, 23 (2023)

    2023

  21. [21]

    V. P. Pavlov, D. Porras, and P. A. Ivanov, Quantum metrology with critical driven-dissipative collective spin system, Phys. Scr.98, 095103 (2023)

    2023

  22. [22]

    Cabot, F

    A. Cabot, F. Carollo, and I. Lesanovsky, Exploiting nonequilibrium phase transitions and strong symmetries for continuous measurement of collective observables, Phys. Rev. A110, L060601 (2024)

    2024

  23. [23]

    Xu and M

    M. Xu and M. J. Holland, Conditional ramsey spec- troscopy with synchronized atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 103601 (2015)

    2015

  24. [24]

    G. L. Giorgi, F. Galve, and R. Zambrini, Probing the spectral density of a dissipative qubit via quantum syn- chronization, Phys. Rev. A94, 052121 (2016)

    2016

  25. [25]

    Cabot, F

    A. Cabot, F. Carollo, and I. Lesanovsky, Continuous sensing and parameter estimation with the boundary time crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 050801 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    Iemini, R

    F. Iemini, R. Fazio, and A. Sanpera, Floquet time crys- tals as quantum sensors of ac fields, Phys. Rev. A109, L050203 (2024)

    2024

  27. [27]

    Gribben, A

    D. Gribben, A. Sanpera, R. Fazio, J. Marino, and F. Iem- ini, Boundary time crystals as AC sensors: Enhance- ments and constraints, SciPost Phys.18, 100 (2025)

    2025

  28. [28]

    Yousefjani, K

    R. Yousefjani, K. Sacha, and A. Bayat, Discrete time crystal phase as a resource for quantum-enhanced sens- ing, Phys. Rev. B111, 125159 (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    Attaining Quantum Sensing Enhancement from Monitored Dissipative Time Crystals

    E. O’Connor, V. Montenegro, F. Albarelli, M. G. A. Paris, A. Bayat, and M. G. Genoni, Attaining quantum sensing enhancement from monitored dissipative time crystals (2026), arXiv:2508.15448 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn,Quantum measure- ment and control(Cambridge university press, 2009)

    2009

  31. [31]

    Catana, M

    C. Catana, M. van Horssen, and M. Guta, Asymptotic in- ference in system identification for the atom maser, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2012). 19

    2012

  32. [32]

    Gammelmark and K

    S. Gammelmark and K. Mølmer, Bayesian parameter in- ference from continuously monitored quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A87, 032115 (2013)

    2013

  33. [33]

    Gammelmark and K

    S. Gammelmark and K. Mølmer, Fisher information and the quantum Cram´ er-Rao sensitivity limit of continuous measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 170401 (2014)

    2014

  34. [34]

    A. H. Kiilerich and K. Mølmer, Estimation of atomic interaction parameters by photon counting, Phys. Rev. A89, 052110 (2014)

    2014

  35. [35]

    A. H. Kiilerich and K. Mølmer, Bayesian parameter es- timation by continuous homodyne detection, Phys. Rev. A94, 032103 (2016)

    2016

  36. [36]

    Cortez, A

    L. Cortez, A. Chantasri, L. P. Garc´ ıa-Pintos, J. Dressel, and A. N. Jordan, Rapid estimation of drifting param- eters in continuously measured quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A95, 012314 (2017)

    2017

  37. [37]

    Albarelli, M

    F. Albarelli, M. A. C. Rossi, D. Tamascelli, and M. G. Genoni, Restoring Heisenberg scaling in noisy quantum metrology by monitoring the environment, Quantum2, 110 (2018)

    2018

  38. [38]

    Shankar, G

    A. Shankar, G. P. Greve, B. Wu, J. K. Thompson, and M. Holland, Continuous real-time tracking of a quan- tum phase below the standard quantum limit, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 233602 (2019)

    2019

  39. [39]

    Amor´ os-Binefa and J

    J. Amor´ os-Binefa and J. Ko lody´ nski, Noisy atomic mag- netometry in real time, New J. Phys.23, 123030 (2021)

    2021

  40. [40]

    D. Yang, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Efficient infor- mation retrieval for sensing via continuous measurement, Phys. Rev. X13, 031012 (2023)

    2023

  41. [41]

    Godley and M

    A. Godley and M. Guta, Adaptive measurement fil- ter: efficient strategy for optimal estimation of quantum Markov chains, Quantum7, 973 (2023)

    2023

  42. [42]

    Ilias, D

    T. Ilias, D. Yang, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Criticality-enhanced electric field gradient sensor with single trapped ions, npj Quantum Inf.10, 36 (2024)

    2024

  43. [43]

    Mattes, A

    R. Mattes, A. Cabot, F. Carollo, and I. Lesanovsky, De- signing open quantum systems for enabling quantum- enhanced sensing through classical measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 230402 (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    A. Khan, F. Albarelli, and A. Datta, Tensor network approach to sensing quantum light-matter interactions, PRX Quantum6, 040343 (2025)

    2025

  45. [45]

    Girotti, A

    F. Girotti, A. Godley, and M. Guta, Estimating quantum Markov chains using coherent absorber post-processing and pattern counting estimator, Quantum9, 1835 (2025)

    2025

  46. [46]

    G. Lee, R. Belyansky, L. Jiang, and A. A. Clerk, Timescales, squeezing and Heisenberg scalings in many-body continuous sensing (2025), arXiv:2505.04591 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    The Boundary Time Crystal as a light source for collectively enhanced sensing

    M. Jirasek, I. Lesanovsky, and A. Cabot, The boundary time crystal as a light source for quantum enhanced sens- ing beyond the Heisenberg limit (2025), arXiv:2511.23416 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    D. Yang, M. Ketkar, K. Audenaert, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum Cram´ er-Rao precision limit of noisy continuous sensing, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 070802 (2026)

    2026

  49. [49]

    Radaelli, J

    M. Radaelli, J. A. Smiga, G. T. Landi, and F. C. Binder, Parameter estimation for quantum jump unrav- eling, Quantum10, 1993 (2026)

    1993

  50. [50]

    Vivas-Via˜ na and C

    A. Vivas-Via˜ na and C. S´ anchez Mu˜ noz, Quantum metrol- ogy through spectral measurements in quantum optics, PRX Quantum7, 010346 (2026)

    2026

  51. [51]

    K. C. Cox, G. P. Greve, J. M. Weiner, and J. K. Thomp- son, Deterministic squeezed states with collective mea- surements and feedback, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 093602 (2016)

    2016

  52. [52]

    A. P. VanDevender, Y. Colombe, J. Amini, D. Leibfried, and D. J. Wineland, Efficient fiber optic detection of trapped ion fluorescence, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 023001 (2010)

    2010

  53. [53]

    Ghadimi, V

    M. Ghadimi, V. Bl¯ ums, B. G. Norton, P. M. Fisher, S. C. Connell, J. M. Amini, C. Volin, H. Hayden, C.-S. Pai, D. Kielpinski, M. Lobino, and E. W. Streed, Scalable ion– photon quantum interface based on integrated diffractive mirrors, npj Quantum Inf3, 4 (2017)

    2017

  54. [54]

    F. W. Knollmann, S. M. Corsetti, E. R. Clements, R. Swint, A. D. Leu, M. E. Kim, P. T. Callahan, D. Kharas, T. Mahony, C. Sorace-Agaskar, R. Mc- Connell, C. D. Bruzewicz, I. L. Chuang, J. Notaros, and J. Chiaverini, Collection of fluorescence from an ion using trap-integrated photonics, Light Sci Appl15, 95 (2026)

    2026

  55. [55]

    Glicenstein, G

    A. Glicenstein, G. Ferioli, L. Brossard, Y. R. P. Sor- tais, D. Barredo, F. Nogrette, I. Ferrier-Barbut, and A. Browaeys, Preparation of one-dimensional chains and dense cold atomic clouds with a high numerical aperture four-lens system, Phys. Rev. A103, 043301 (2021)

    2021

  56. [56]

    Demkowicz-Dobrza´ nski, J

    R. Demkowicz-Dobrza´ nski, J. Czajkowski, and P. Sekatski, Adaptive quantum metrology under general markovian noise, Phys. Rev. X7, 041009 (2017)

    2017

  57. [57]

    Y. L. Len, T. Gefen, A. Retzker, and J. Ko lody´ nski, Quantum metrology with imperfect measurements, Nat. Commun.13, 6971 (2022)

    2022

  58. [58]

    R. J. Cook and H. J. Kimble, Possibility of direct ob- servation of quantum jumps, Phys. Rev. Lett.54, 1023 (1985)

    1985

  59. [59]

    H. J. Kimble, R. J. Cook, and A. L. Wells, Intermittent atomic fluorescence, Phys. Rev. A34, 3190 (1986)

    1986

  60. [60]

    Zoller, M

    P. Zoller, M. Marte, and D. F. Walls, Quantum jumps in atomic systems, Phys. Rev. A35, 198 (1987)

    1987

  61. [61]

    Schenzle and R

    A. Schenzle and R. G. Brewer, Macroscopic quantum jumps in a single atom, Phys. Rev. A34, 3127 (1986)

    1986

  62. [62]

    M. S. Kim and P. L. Knight, Quantum-jump telegraph noise and macroscopic intensity fluctuations, Phys. Rev. A36, 5265 (1987)

    1987

  63. [63]

    J. C. Bergquist, R. G. Hulet, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland, Observation of quantum jumps in a single atom, Phys. Rev. Lett.57, 1699 (1986)

    1986

  64. [64]

    Sauter, W

    T. Sauter, W. Neuhauser, R. Blatt, and P. E. Toschek, Observation of quantum jumps, Phys. Rev. Lett.57, 1696 (1986)

    1986

  65. [65]

    Nagourney, J

    W. Nagourney, J. Sandberg, and H. Dehmelt, Shelved op- tical electron amplifier: Observation of quantum jumps, Phys. Rev. Lett.56, 2797 (1986)

    1986

  66. [66]

    M. B. Plenio and P. L. Knight, The quantum-jump ap- proach to dissipative dynamics in quantum optics, Rev. Mod. Phys.70, 101 (1998)

    1998

  67. [67]

    Gleyzes, S

    S. Gleyzes, S. Kuhr, C. Guerlin, J. Bernu, S. Del´ eglise, U. Busk Hoff, M. Brune, J.-M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Quantum jumps of light recording the birth and death of a photon in a cavity, Nature446, 297 (2007)

    2007

  68. [68]

    J. P. Garrahan and I. Lesanovsky, Thermodynamics of quantum jump trajectories, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 160601 (2010)

    2010

  69. [69]

    Lesanovsky, M

    I. Lesanovsky, M. van Horssen, M. Gut ¸˘ a, and J. P. Garra- han, Characterization of dynamical phase transitions in quantum jump trajectories beyond the properties of the 20 stationary state, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 150401 (2013)

    2013

  70. [70]

    D. C. Rose, K. Macieszczak, I. Lesanovsky, and J. P. Gar- rahan, Metastability in an open quantum Ising model, Phys. Rev. E94, 052132 (2016)

    2016

  71. [71]

    M. Cech, M. Cea, M. C. Ba˜ nuls, I. Lesanovsky, and F. Carollo, Space-time correlations in monitored kineti- cally constrained discrete-time quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 230403 (2025)

    2025

  72. [72]

    W. M. Itano, J. C. Bergquist, R. G. Hulet, and D. J. Wineland, Radiative decay rates in Hg + from observa- tions of quantum jumps in a single ion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2732 (1987)

    1987

  73. [73]

    P. A. Barton, C. J. S. Donald, D. M. Lucas, D. A. Stevens, A. M. Steane, and D. N. Stacey, Measurement of the lifetime of the 3d 2D5/2 state in 40Ca+, Phys. Rev. A62, 032503 (2000)

    2000

  74. [74]

    Staanum, I

    P. Staanum, I. S. Jensen, R. G. Martinussen, D. Voigt, and M. Drewsen, Lifetime measurement of the metastable 3d 2D5/2 state in the 40Ca+ ion using the shelving technique on a few-ion string, Phys. Rev. A69, 032503 (2004)

    2004

  75. [75]

    Fleischhauer, A

    M. Fleischhauer, A. Imamoglu, and J. P. Marangos, Elec- tromagnetically induced transparency: Optics in coher- ent media, Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 633 (2005)

    2005

  76. [76]

    Donarini, M

    A. Donarini, M. Niklas, M. Schafberger, N. Paradiso, C. Strunk, and M. Grifoni, Coherent population trapping by dark state formation in a carbon nanotube quantum dot, Nat. Commun.10, 381 (2019)

    2019

  77. [77]

    K. N. Tolazzi, B. Wang, C. Ianzano, J. Neumeier, C. J. Villas-Boas, and G. Rempe, Continuous quantum light from a dark atom, Commun. Phys.4, 57 (2021)

    2021

  78. [78]

    Morigi, J

    G. Morigi, J. Eschner, and C. H. Keitel, Ground state laser cooling using electromagnetically induced trans- parency, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 4458 (2000)

    2000

  79. [79]

    Y. Lin, J. P. Gaebler, T. R. Tan, R. Bowler, J. D. Jost, D. Leibfried, and D. J. Wineland, Sympathetic electromagnetically-induced-transparency laser cooling of motional modes in an ion chain, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 153002 (2013)

    2013

  80. [80]

    Lechner, C

    R. Lechner, C. Maier, C. Hempel, P. Jurcevic, B. P. Lanyon, T. Monz, M. Brownnutt, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Electromagnetically-induced-transparency ground-state cooling of long ion strings, Phys. Rev. A 93, 053401 (2016)

    2016

Showing first 80 references.