pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.27047 · v1 · pith:BMKRLOYEnew · submitted 2026-05-26 · 🌀 gr-qc

Canonical quantization of massive vector field in Schwarzschild black hole background

Chandra Prakash , Rajesh Karmakar This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 16:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords Proca fieldcanonical quantizationSchwarzschild spacetimeDirac bracketsHawking spectrumquantum vacuafield condensate
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Proca field admits canonical quantization in Schwarzschild spacetime via the Dirac bracket formalism, yielding consistent operator algebra, Hawking spectrum, and significant condensate near the future horizon.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper performs a first-principles canonical quantization of the massive vector Proca field in Schwarzschild spacetime. It applies the Dirac bracket formalism to manage the field's inherent constraints and derives a consistent commutator algebra for creation and annihilation operators. Standard vacua are defined, the Hawking spectrum is obtained in the Unruh vacuum, and the two-point function condensate is evaluated numerically across the vacua. A sympathetic reader would care because the longitudinal polarization mode of the massive field requires this constrained treatment, which is absent for massless vectors, and the results show its condensate grows large near the horizon.

Core claim

By implementing the Dirac bracket formalism to treat the constraints inherent in the Proca action, we derive a consistent framework for the commutator algebra of creation and annihilation operators. Following this construction, we define the usual Boulware, Unruh, and Hartle-Hawking vacua. Using the Unruh vacuum, we derive and analyze the Hawking spectrum of the Proca field. Furthermore, we numerically evaluate the Proca condensate constructed from the two-point correlation function, and we find that the condensate becomes significant near the boundary of the future horizon.

What carries the argument

The Dirac bracket formalism applied to the constrained Proca field variables on the Schwarzschild background, which produces the commutator algebra and permits vacuum definitions.

If this is right

  • The commutator algebra of creation and annihilation operators for the Proca field is consistent.
  • The Hawking spectrum of the Proca field follows from the Unruh vacuum construction.
  • The Proca condensate constructed from the two-point function becomes significant near the future horizon boundary.
  • The interplay among the different polarization modes affects the quantum observables.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method may be applied to other static black hole metrics to check whether condensate enhancement near the horizon persists.
  • Comparison of the derived Hawking spectrum against semiclassical expectations for massive vectors could test the framework.
  • The condensate result raises the possibility that massive vector contributions to near-horizon stress-energy differ from those of massless fields.

Load-bearing premise

The Dirac bracket formalism developed for flat-space constrained systems continues to produce a consistent positive-definite inner product and unitary evolution when the background metric is the curved Schwarzschild geometry and the field has a mass term.

What would settle it

An explicit calculation demonstrating that the Dirac brackets yield a non-positive-definite inner product or non-unitary evolution for Proca modes in Schwarzschild coordinates would falsify the quantization framework.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.27047 by Chandra Prakash, Rajesh Karmakar.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Representation of out and down radial modes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Representation of in and up radial modes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Penrose diagram of maximally extended [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The Hawking spectrum has been plotted for different polarizations. Comparisons have been made between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: The Proca condensate has been plotted with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We perform a first-principles canonical quantization of a massive vector field, often referred to as the Proca field, in a Schwarzschild spacetime background. While scalar, fermionic, and electromagnetic fields are well studied in this context, the Proca field requires a more nuanced treatment because of the physical nature of the longitudinal polarization mode and the constrained dynamics of the field variables. By implementing the Dirac bracket formalism to treat the constraints inherent in the Proca action, we derive a consistent framework for the commutator algebra of creation and annihilation operators. Following this construction, we define the usual Boulware, Unruh, and Hartle-Hawking vacua. Using the Unruh vacuum, we derive and analyze the Hawking spectrum of the Proca field. Furthermore, we numerically evaluate the Proca condensate constructed from the two-point correlation function $\langle A_\mu(x) A_\nu(x') \rangle$, defined on all three vacuum states. We find that the condensate becomes significant near the boundary of the future horizon. Our results highlight the interplay among the different polarization modes and the significance of the Proca mass in quantum observables.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript performs a first-principles canonical quantization of the massive vector (Proca) field on a Schwarzschild background. It applies the Dirac bracket formalism to the constrained Proca action to obtain the commutator algebra of creation and annihilation operators, defines the Boulware, Unruh and Hartle-Hawking vacua, extracts the Hawking spectrum in the Unruh vacuum, and numerically evaluates the two-point condensate ⟨A_μ(x)A_ν(x')⟩ on all three vacua, reporting that the condensate becomes significant near the future horizon.

Significance. If the algebraic construction is shown to be consistent, the work would supply a concrete framework for quantizing a massive vector field with a dynamical longitudinal mode in a black-hole geometry. The numerical condensate result would then constitute a falsifiable prediction for the behavior of massive gauge fields near horizons. The paper correctly invokes standard techniques (Dirac brackets, Unruh vacuum) without parameter fitting, which is a methodological strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and constrained-dynamics section] The central claim that the Dirac-bracket algebra yields a positive-definite inner product and unitary evolution for all three polarization modes (including the longitudinal mode) is load-bearing, yet the manuscript supplies neither the explicit mode equations nor the resulting commutators [a_i,a_j†] after reduction on the Schwarzschild background. Without these expressions it is impossible to verify that the curved-space symplectic form and position-dependent mass term do not produce negative-norm states near the horizon.
  2. [Numerical condensate section] The numerical evaluation of the Proca condensate is presented without error estimates, convergence tests, or a statement of the radial cutoff and mode truncation used. This undermines the quantitative claim that the condensate “becomes significant near the boundary of the future horizon.”
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the three polarization vectors and the decomposition into transverse and longitudinal modes should be introduced once and used consistently.
  2. The manuscript should cite the original Dirac-bracket literature for constrained systems and at least one prior treatment of massive vector fields in curved space for context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the two major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and constrained-dynamics section] The central claim that the Dirac-bracket algebra yields a positive-definite inner product and unitary evolution for all three polarization modes (including the longitudinal mode) is load-bearing, yet the manuscript supplies neither the explicit mode equations nor the resulting commutators [a_i,a_j†] after reduction on the Schwarzschild background. Without these expressions it is impossible to verify that the curved-space symplectic form and position-dependent mass term do not produce negative-norm states near the horizon.

    Authors: We agree that the explicit mode equations and the reduced commutators [a_i, a_j†] are necessary to allow independent verification of the positive-definite inner product and unitary evolution. The manuscript describes the application of the Dirac-bracket procedure to the constrained Proca action and states that the resulting algebra is consistent for all three polarizations, but does not display the explicit expressions after reduction on the Schwarzschild metric. In the revised version we will insert the mode equations obtained from the Dirac brackets together with the final commutators, thereby making the absence of negative-norm states explicit. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical condensate section] The numerical evaluation of the Proca condensate is presented without error estimates, convergence tests, or a statement of the radial cutoff and mode truncation used. This undermines the quantitative claim that the condensate “becomes significant near the boundary of the future horizon.”

    Authors: We accept that the numerical section is insufficiently documented. The condensate was obtained from a mode-sum representation of the two-point function in the three vacua, yet the manuscript omits error bars, convergence checks, and the precise values of the radial cutoff and mode truncation. In the revision we will add these details, including tabulated convergence tests and a statement of the truncation parameters, so that the reported growth of the condensate near the future horizon is placed on a firmer quantitative footing. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: first-principles application of standard Dirac-bracket quantization

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by applying the established Dirac bracket procedure for constrained systems (Proca action) to the Schwarzschild background, constructing the commutator algebra, defining standard vacua (Boulware, Unruh, Hartle-Hawking), and computing the Hawking spectrum and condensate from the two-point function. No step reduces a claimed prediction or result to a fitted parameter, self-defined quantity, or load-bearing self-citation; the central construction is independent of the target observables and relies on external mathematical techniques rather than re-deriving its own inputs. The positive-definiteness question raised by the skeptic is a potential correctness or applicability issue, not a circularity reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the Dirac-bracket treatment of Proca constraints is treated as a standard tool imported from prior literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5723 in / 1342 out tokens · 33503 ms · 2026-06-29T16:08:56.137726+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · 31 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    × 10-6 ωrh 〈Nωℓm〉 Hawking flux ℓ=2,∀m Even parity(+) Even parity(-) Odd parity 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0

  2. [2]

    5: The Hawking spectrum has been plotted for different polarizations

    × 10-8 ωrh 〈Nωℓm〉 Hawking flux ℓ=3,∀m FIG. 5: The Hawking spectrum has been plotted for different polarizations. Comparisons have been made between differentℓmodes atI +. GB µν′(x, x′) = X λ,ℓ,m Z ∞ µ dω A (ζ) in µ (x)A (ζ) in∗ ν′ (x′) + Z ∞ 0 dω A (ζ) up µ (x)A (ζ) up∗ ν′ (x′) ,(7.3) GU µν′(x, x′) = X λ,ℓ,m Z ∞ µ dω A (ζ) in µ (x)A (ζ) in∗ ν′ (x′) + Z ∞ ...

  3. [3]

    Towards the Theory of Reheating After Inflation

    L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. D56, 3258 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9704452

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  4. [4]

    S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys.43, 199 (1975), [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

    1975

  5. [5]

    Candelas, Phys

    P. Candelas, Phys. Rev. D21, 2185 (1980)

    1980

  6. [6]

    E. W. Kolb and A. J. Long, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 045005 (2024), arXiv:2312.09042 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1982)

    1982

  8. [8]

    L. E. Parker and D. Toms,Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime: Quantized Field and Gravity, Cam- bridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cam- bridge University Press, 2009)

    2009

  9. [9]

    P. C. W. Davies, S. A. Fulling, and W. G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. D13, 2720 (1976)

    1976

  10. [10]

    W. G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. D14, 870 (1976)

    1976

  11. [11]

    Candelas and K

    P. Candelas and K. W. Howard, Phys. Rev. D29, 1618 (1984)

    1984

  12. [12]

    K. W. Howard and P. Candelas, Phys. Rev. Lett.53, 403 (1984)

    1984

  13. [13]

    J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking, Phys. Rev. D13, 2188 (1976)

    1976

  14. [14]

    Israel, Phys

    W. Israel, Phys. Lett. A57, 107 (1976)

    1976

  15. [15]

    Anomaly induced effective actions and Hawking radiation

    R. Balbinot, A. Fabbri, and I. L. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 1494 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9904074

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  16. [16]

    Particle production and complex path analysis

    K. Srinivasan and T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rev. D60, 024007 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9812028

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  17. [17]

    M. K. Parikh and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 5042 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/9907001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  18. [18]

    S. P. Robinson and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 011303 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0502074

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  19. [19]

    B. R. Majhi, Phys. Rev. D79, 044005 (2009), arXiv:0809.1508 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  20. [20]

    Hawking black body spectrum from tunneling mechanism

    R. Banerjee and B. R. Majhi, Phys. Lett. B675, 243 (2009), arXiv:0903.0250 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  21. [21]

    An exact derivation of the Hawking effect in canonical formulation

    S. Barman, G. M. Hossain, and C. Singha, Phys. Rev. D97, 025016 (2018), arXiv:1707.03614 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  22. [22]

    Quantum Tunneling and Back Reaction

    R. Banerjee and B. R. Majhi, Phys. Lett. B662, 62 (2008), arXiv:0801.0200 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  23. [23]

    S. M. Christensen and S. A. Fulling, Phys. Rev. D15, 2088 (1977)

    2088

  24. [24]

    Balakumar, R

    V. Balakumar, R. P. Bernar, and E. Winstanley, Phys. Rev. D106, 125013 (2022), arXiv:2205.14483 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    Egorov, M

    V. Egorov, M. Smolyakov, and I. Volobuev, Phys. Rev. D107, 025001 (2023), arXiv:2209.02067 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    P. R. Anderson, W. A. Hiscock, and D. A. Samuel, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 1739 (1993)

    1993

  27. [27]

    D. G. Boulware, Phys. Rev. D12, 350 (1975)

    1975

  28. [28]

    Volobuev, V

    I. Volobuev, V. Egorov, and M. Smolyakov, Teor. Mat. Fiz.225, 591 (2025), arXiv:2410.07049 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    L. C. Crispino, A. Higuchi, and G. E. Matsas, Physical Review D63, 124008 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0011070

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  30. [30]

    Candelas, P

    P. Candelas, P. Chrzanowski, and K. W. Howard, Phys. Rev. D24, 297 (1981)

    1981

  31. [31]

    Hawking radiation for a Proca field in D-dimensions

    C. Herdeiro, M. O. P. Sampaio, and M. Wang, Phys. Rev. D85, 024005 (2012), arXiv:1110.2485 [gr-qc]. 24

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  32. [32]

    V. P. Frolov, P. Krtous, D. Kubizn´ ak, and J. E. Santos, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 231103 (2018), arXiv:1804.00030 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    G. D. Kribs, G. Lee, and A. Martin, Phys. Rev. D106, 055020 (2022), arXiv:2204.01755 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    The Dark Photon

    M. Fabbrichesi, E. Gabrielli, and G. Lanfranchi, (2020), 10.1007/978-3-030-62519-1, arXiv:2005.01515 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62519-1 2020

  35. [35]

    Marriott-Best, M

    A. Marriott-Best, M. Peloso, and G. Tasinato, Phys. Rev. D111, 103511 (2025), arXiv:2502.13116 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    March-Russell and J

    J. March-Russell and J. G. Rosa, Phys. Rev. D113, L101304 (2026), arXiv:2205.15277 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    E. C. G. Stueckelberg, Helv. Phys. Acta11(1938)

    1938

  38. [38]

    The Stueckelberg Field

    H. Ruegg and M. Ruiz-Altaba, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A19, 3265 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0304245

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  39. [39]

    Stueckelberg massive electromagnetism in curved spacetime: Hadamard renormalization of the stress-energy tensor and the Casimir effect

    A. Belokogne and A. Folacci, Phys. Rev. D93, 044063 (2016), arXiv:1512.06326 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  40. [40]

    S. W. Hawking, M. J. Perry, and A. Strominger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 231301 (2016), arXiv:1601.00921 [hep- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  41. [41]

    Hell, JCAP01, 056 (2022), arXiv:2109.05030 [hep-th]

    A. Hell, JCAP01, 056 (2022), arXiv:2109.05030 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    P. A. M. Dirac, Can. J. Math.2, 129 (1950)

    1950

  43. [43]

    P. G. Bergmann, Phys. Rev.75, 680 (1949)

    1949

  44. [44]

    P. G. Bergmann and I. Goldberg, Phys. Rev.98, 531 (1955)

    1955

  45. [45]

    Lectures on Constrained Systems

    G. Date, inRefresher Course for College Teachers(2010) arXiv:1010.2062 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  46. [46]

    Das,Lectures on quantum field theory(World Scien- tific, 2020)

    A. Das,Lectures on quantum field theory(World Scien- tific, 2020)

    2020

  47. [47]

    P. A. Dirac,Lectures on quantum mechanics(Courier Corporation, 2013)

    2013

  48. [48]

    D. N. Page, Phys. Rev. D13, 198 (1976)

    1976

  49. [49]

    J. G. Rosa and S. R. Dolan, Phys. Rev. D85, 044043 (2012), arXiv:1110.4494 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  50. [50]

    Black-hole hair from vector dark matter accretion

    F. Hancock and H. Witek, (2025), arXiv:2506.06554 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Percival and S

    J. Percival and S. R. Dolan, Phys. Rev. D102, 104055 (2020), arXiv:2008.10621 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  52. [52]

    T. V. Fernandes, D. Hilditch, J. P. S. Lemos, and V. Car- doso, Phys. Rev. D105, 044017 (2022), arXiv:2112.03282 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    Separation of Maxwell equations in Kerr-NUT-(A)dS spacetimes

    P. Krtous, V. P. Frolov, and D. Kubizn´ ak, Nucl. Phys. B934, 7 (2018), arXiv:1803.02485 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  54. [54]

    Minucci and R

    M. Minucci and R. Panosso Macedo, General Relativity and Gravitation57, 33 (2025)

    2025

  55. [55]

    On analytic solutions of wave equations in regular coordinate systems on Schwarzschild background

    D. Philipp and V. Perlick, (2015), arXiv:1503.08101 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  56. [56]

    V. B. Bezerra, H. S. Vieira, and A. A. Costa, Class. Quant. Grav.31, 045003 (2014), arXiv:1312.4823 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  57. [57]

    H. S. Vieira, V. B. Bezerra, and C. R. Muniz, Annals Phys.350, 14 (2014), arXiv:1401.5397 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  58. [58]

    Unruh, Physical Review D14, 3251 (1976)

    W. Unruh, Physical Review D14, 3251 (1976)

    1976

  59. [59]

    X.-H. Ge, M. Matsumoto, and K. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 112, 046024 (2025), arXiv:2502.15627 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    Balakumar,Aspects of quantum charged scalar field theory in curved spacetime: Black hole superradiance and Hadamard renormalisation, Ph.D

    V. Balakumar,Aspects of quantum charged scalar field theory in curved spacetime: Black hole superradiance and Hadamard renormalisation, Ph.D. thesis, Sheffield U. (2022)

    2022

  61. [61]

    K. M. Vispute and R. Karmakar, will be submitted soon (2026)

    2026

  62. [62]

    C. L. Benone, E. S. de Oliveira, S. R. Dolan, and L. C. B. Crispino, Phys. Rev. D89, 104053 (2014), arXiv:1404.0687 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  63. [63]

    Poisson,A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics(Cambridge University Press, 2009)

    E. Poisson,A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics(Cambridge University Press, 2009)

    2009

  64. [64]

    Novikov and V

    I. Novikov and V. Frolov,Physics of black holes, Vol. 27 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

    2013

  65. [65]

    Henneaux and C

    M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim,Quantization of Gauge Systems(Princeton University Press, 1994)

    1994

  66. [66]

    H. J. Rothe and K. D. Rothe,Classical and quantum dy- namics of constrained Hamiltonian systems(World Sci- entific, Singapore, 2010)

    2010

  67. [67]

    A. W. Wipf, Lect. Notes Phys.434, 22 (1994), arXiv:hep- th/9312078

    work page arXiv 1994

  68. [68]

    J. D. Brown, Universe8, 171 (2022), arXiv:2201.06558 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  69. [69]

    Some Remarks on the Quantization of Gauge Theories

    R. Vathsan, J. Math. Phys.37, 1713 (1996), [Erratum: J.Math.Phys. 37, 6590 (1996)], arXiv:hep-th/9507066

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  70. [70]

    Chingangbam and P

    P. Chingangbam and P. Sharan, (1999), arXiv:quant- ph/9910049

    work page arXiv 1999

  71. [71]

    H. P. Pavel and V. N. Pervushin, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 14, 2285 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9706220

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  72. [72]

    P. W. Graham, J. Mardon, and S. Rajendran, Phys. Rev. D93, 103520 (2016), arXiv:1504.02102 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  73. [73]

    E. W. Kolb and A. J. Long, JHEP03, 283 (2021), arXiv:2009.03828 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  74. [74]

    Greiner and J

    W. Greiner and J. Reinhardt,Field quantization (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

    2013

  75. [75]

    A. Das, S. Dalui, C. Chowdhury, and B. R. Majhi, Phys. Rev. D100, 085002 (2019), arXiv:1902.03735 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  76. [76]

    Balbinot and A

    R. Balbinot and A. Fabbri, Universe10, 18 (2024), arXiv:2311.09943 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  77. [77]

    D. G. Boulware, Phys. Rev. D11, 1404 (1975)

    1975

  78. [78]

    M. D. Kruskal, Phys. Rev.119, 1743 (1960)

    1960

  79. [79]

    I. D. Novikov and V. P. Frolov,PHYSICS OF BLACK HOLES(Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1989)

    1989

  80. [80]

    S. A. Fulling and S. N. M. Ruijsenaars, Phys. Rept.152, 135 (1987)

    1987

Showing first 80 references.