pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.27731 · v1 · pith:7OUFAADEnew · submitted 2026-05-26 · ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· cond-mat.soft· nlin.CD· physics.app-ph

Polymer extension at stagnation points governs flow thickening of polymer solutions in ordered porous media

Emily Y. Chen , Simon J. Haward , Amy Q. Shen , Sujit S. Datta This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 15:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.softnlin.CDphysics.app-ph
keywords polymer solutionsflow thickeningporous mediastagnation pointspolymer extensionordered mediaviscous dissipationrheology
0
0 comments X

The pith

Polymer extension at stagnation points governs flow thickening of polymer solutions in ordered porous media.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a model connecting pore-scale flow patterns to the rheology of polymer solutions, showing that the sudden rise in macroscopic flow resistance above a threshold rate occurs because polymers stretch at stagnation points. This explains why the effect appears in porous media but not in bulk flow, and why ordered arrangements differ from disordered ones where flow fluctuations add extra dissipation. Experiments in both two- and three-dimensional porous structures validate the quantitative predictions. A sympathetic reader would care because the result supplies a way to forecast resistance in applications that rely on polymer flows through structured media.

Core claim

Flow thickening in ordered porous media is governed by polymer extension at stagnation points. A model is developed that quantitatively links pore-scale flow fields and fluid rheology to macroscopic flow thickening and is validated by experiments in 2D and 3D porous media. In contrast to disordered media, where viscous dissipation by unsteady flow fluctuations also contributes substantially.

What carries the argument

The quantitative model that links pore-scale flow fields and fluid rheology to macroscopic flow thickening, with polymer extension at stagnation points as the governing mechanism in ordered media.

If this is right

  • Flow thickening in ordered media can be predicted from pore-scale kinematics alone.
  • The distinction between ordered and disordered media enables geometry-specific control of macroscopic resistance.
  • The validated model applies across two- and three-dimensional geometries.
  • Predictions become available for energy, environmental, industrial, and microfluidic applications.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Designing ordered media to reduce the number or strength of stagnation points could suppress thickening without changing the polymer.
  • The same stagnation-point mechanism may govern viscoelastic thickening in other flows that contain zero-velocity points, such as certain microfluidic contractions.
  • Systematic variation of stagnation-point density in fabricated media would provide a direct test of the model's scaling.

Load-bearing premise

The developed model quantitatively links pore-scale flow fields and fluid rheology to macroscopic flow thickening and is validated by experiments in 2D and 3D porous media.

What would settle it

An experiment in an ordered porous medium in which the measured flow thickening deviates from the model's prediction based on polymer extension at stagnation points.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.27731 by Amy Q. Shen, Emily Y. Chen, Simon J. Haward, Sujit S. Datta.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Fluid rheology and experimental setup. (a) Steady [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Experiments in 2D hexagonal arrays. (a-b) Path [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Collapse of measured macroscopic flow resistance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Polymer solutions exhibit anomalous flow thickening -- marked by an abrupt increase in the macroscopic flow resistance -- above a threshold flow rate in a porous medium, but not in bulk solution. This phenomenon has evaded a mechanistic description for over half a century. Here, we develop a model that quantitatively links pore-scale flow fields and fluid rheology to macroscopic flow thickening, and validate it in experiments in two- and three-dimensional (2D and 3D) porous media. We find that flow thickening in ordered media is governed by polymer extension at stagnation points -- in contrast to disordered media, where viscous dissipation by unsteady flow fluctuations also contributes substantially. Our results provide a foundation to predict and control such flows in energy, environmental, industrial, and microfluidic applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims that flow thickening of polymer solutions in porous media arises from polymer extension at stagnation points in ordered media (with a quantitative model linking pore-scale flow fields and rheology to macroscopic resistance), while disordered media involve additional viscous dissipation from unsteady fluctuations. The model is developed and validated experimentally in both 2D and 3D ordered and disordered porous media.

Significance. If the quantitative linkage and experimental validation hold, the work supplies the first mechanistic account of a phenomenon that has resisted explanation for over 50 years. The ordered/disordered distinction and the pore-to-macro upscaling provide a predictive foundation for applications in energy, environmental, industrial, and microfluidic flows. Experimental coverage of both 2D and 3D geometries adds robustness.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'quantitatively links pore-scale flow fields and fluid rheology to macroscopic flow thickening' would benefit from a one-sentence indication of the central relation or upscaling step used.
  2. [Methods / Figures] Figure captions and methods: ensure all error bars, number of replicates, and any data-exclusion criteria are stated explicitly so that the claimed quantitative agreement can be assessed directly.
  3. [Model section] Notation: define all symbols (e.g., local extension rate, resistance coefficient) at first use and confirm consistency between the model equations and the experimental observables.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our work and for recommending minor revision. The referee's summary accurately captures the central claim that polymer extension at stagnation points governs flow thickening in ordered porous media, with additional contributions from flow fluctuations in disordered media, and the experimental validation in 2D and 3D geometries. Since no major comments are provided in the report, we have no specific points requiring response or revision at this stage.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation grounded in pore-scale physics and external experimental validation

full rationale

The paper develops a model that quantitatively links pore-scale flow fields and fluid rheology to macroscopic flow thickening, validated in 2D and 3D experiments. The central claim (flow thickening in ordered media governed by polymer extension at stagnation points, in contrast to disordered media) is presented as following from this linkage and experimental data, without evidence of self-definitional reductions, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that collapse the result to its inputs by construction. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; the central claim rests on the domain assumption that polymer solutions exhibit anomalous flow thickening in porous media but not bulk solution, and that the model can be validated experimentally.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Polymer solutions exhibit anomalous flow thickening above a threshold flow rate in a porous medium but not in bulk solution
    Stated as background fact in the abstract opening sentence

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5685 in / 1168 out tokens · 39373 ms · 2026-06-29T15:02:11.551496+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    C. A. Browne and S. S. Datta, Elastic turbulence gener- ates anomalous flow resistance in porous media, Sci. Adv. 7, 11 (2021)

    2021

  2. [2]

    C. A. Browne, R. B. Huang, C. W. Zheng, and S. S. Datta, Homogenizing fluid transport in stratified porous media using an elastic flow instability, J. Fluid Mech. 963, A30 (2023)

    2023

  3. [3]

    Chilcott and J

    M. Chilcott and J. Rallison, Creeping flow of dilute poly- mer solutions past cylinders and spheres, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech.29, 381 (1988)

    1988

  4. [4]

    K. K. Talwar and B. Khomami, Flow of viscoelastic flu- ids past periodic square arrays of cylinders: inertial and shear thinning viscosity and elasticity effects, J. Rheol. 57, 177 (1995)

    1995

  5. [5]

    Khomami and L

    B. Khomami and L. D. Moreno, Stability of viscoelastic flow around periodic arrays of cylinders, Rheol. Acta36, 367 (1997)

    1997

  6. [6]

    Mokhtari, J.-C

    O. Mokhtari, J.-C. Latch´ e, M. Quintard, and Y. Davit, Birefringent strands drive the flow of viscoelastic fluids past obstacles, J. Fluid Mech.948, A2 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    E. H. Wissler, Viscoelastic Effects in the Flow of Non- Newtonian Fluids through a Porous Medium, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fund.10, 411 (1971)

    1971

  8. [8]

    Vossoughi and F

    S. Vossoughi and F. A. Seyer, Pressure drop for flow of polymer solution in a model porous medium, Can. J. Chem. Eng.52, 666 (1974)

    1974

  9. [9]

    R. V. Dharmadhikari and D. D. Kale, Flow of non- Newtonian fluids through porous media, Chem. Eng. Sci. 40, 527 (1985)

    1985

  10. [10]

    Bendov´ a, B.ˇSiˇ ska, and I

    H. Bendov´ a, B.ˇSiˇ ska, and I. Machaˇ c, Pressure drop ex- cess in the flow of viscoelastic liquids through fixed beds of particles, Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif.48, 29 (2009)

    2009

  11. [11]

    Sobti and R

    A. Sobti and R. K. Wanchoo, Creeping Flow of Viscoelas- tic Fluid through a Packed Bed, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53, 14508 (2014)

    2014

  12. [12]

    C. A. Browne and S. S. Datta, Harnessing elastic instabil- ities for enhanced mixing and reaction kinetics in porous media, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.121, e2320962121 (2024)

    2024

  13. [13]

    S. S. Datta, A. M. Ardekani, P. E. Arratia, A. N. Beris, I. Bischofberger, G. H. McKinley, J. G. Eggers, J. E. L´ opez-Aguilar, S. M. Fielding, A. Frishman,et al., Per- spectives on viscoelastic flow instabilities and elastic tur- bulence, Phys. Rev. Fluids7, 080701 (2022)

    2022

  14. [14]

    Groisman and V

    A. Groisman and V. Steinberg, Elastic turbulence in a polymer solution flow, Nature405, 53 (2000)

    2000

  15. [15]

    Groisman and V

    A. Groisman and V. Steinberg, Elastic turbulence in curvilinear flows of polymer solutions, New J. Phys.6, 29 (2004)

    2004

  16. [16]

    J. Zilz, R. J. Poole, M. A. Alves, D. Bartolo, B. Levach´ e, and A. Lindner, Geometric scaling of a purely elastic flow instability in serpentine channels, J. Fluid Mech.712, 203 (2012)

    2012

  17. [17]

    Casanellas, M

    L. Casanellas, M. A. Alves, R. J. Poole, S. Lerouge, and A. Lindner, The stabilizing effect of shear thinning on the onset of purely elastic instabilities in serpentine mi- croflows, Soft Matter12, 6167 (2016)

    2016

  18. [18]

    Qin and P

    B. Qin and P. E. Arratia, Characterizing elastic tur- bulence in channel flows at low Reynolds number, Phys. Rev. Fluids2, 083302 (2017)

    2017

  19. [19]

    van Buel and H

    R. van Buel and H. Stark, Characterizing elastic tur- bulence in the three-dimensional von K´ arm´ an swirling flow using the Oldroyd-B model, Phys. Fluids34, 043112 (2022)

    2022

  20. [20]

    ¨Oztekin, B

    A. ¨Oztekin, B. Alakus, and G. H. McKinley, Stability of planar stagnation flow of a highly viscoelastic fluid, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech.72, 1 (1997)

    1997

  21. [21]

    P. E. Arratia, C. C. Thomas, J. Diorio, and J. P. Gol- lub, Elastic Instabilities of Polymer Solutions in Cross- Channel Flow, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 144502 (2006)

    2006

  22. [22]

    R. J. Poole, M. A. Alves, and P. J. Oliveira, Purely elastic flow asymmetries, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 164503 (2007)

    2007

  23. [23]

    Shi and G

    X. Shi and G. Christopher, Growth of viscoelastic in- stabilities around linear cylinder arrays, Phys. Fluids28, 124102 (2016)

    2016

  24. [24]

    Y. Zhao, A. Q. Shen, and S. J. Haward, Flow of worm- like micellar solutions around confined microfluidic cylin- ders, Soft Matter12, 8666 (2016)

    2016

  25. [25]

    B. Qin, P. F. Salipante, S. D. Hudson, and P. E. Arra- tia, Upstream vortex and elastic wave in the viscoelastic flow around a confined cylinder, J. Fluid Mech.864, R2 (2019). 8

    2019

  26. [26]

    S. J. Haward, N. Kitajima, K. Toda-Peters, T. Taka- hashi, and A. Q. Shen, Flow of wormlike micellar solu- tions around microfluidic cylinders with high aspect ratio and low blockage ratio, Soft Matter15, 1927 (2019)

    1927

  27. [27]

    S. J. Haward, C. C. Hopkins, and A. Q. Shen, Asymmet- ric flow of polymer solutions around microfluidic cylin- ders: Interaction between shear-thinning and viscoelas- ticity, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech.278, 104250 (2020)

    2020

  28. [29]

    C. C. Hopkins, S. J. Haward, and A. Q. Shen, Upstream wall vortices in viscoelastic flow past a cylinder, Soft Mat- ter18, 4868 (2022)

    2022

  29. [30]

    C. C. Hopkins, A. Q. Shen, and S. J. Haward, Effect of blockage ratio on flow of a viscoelastic wormlike micellar solution past a cylinder in a microchannel, Soft Matter 18, 8856 (2022)

    2022

  30. [32]

    S. J. Haward and A. Q. Shen, Effects of fluid rheol- ogy and geometric disorder on the enhanced resistance of viscoelastic flows through porous media, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech.349, 105619 (2026)

    2026

  31. [33]

    J. H. Snoeijer, A. Pandey, M. A. Herrada, and J. Eggers, The relationship between viscoelasticity and elasticity, Proc. R. Soc. A.476, 20200419 (2020)

    2020

  32. [34]

    See supplemental material at [url will be inserted by publisher] for experimental methods, derivation of the- ory, and additional analysis

  33. [35]

    F. T. Trouton, On the coefficient of viscous traction and its relation to that of viscosity., Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 77, 426 (1906)

    1906

  34. [37]

    S. S. Datta, H. Chiang, T. Ramakrishnan, and D. A. Weitz, Spatial fluctuations of fluid velocities in flow through a three-dimensional porous medium, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 064501 (2013)

    2013

  35. [38]

    Thielicke and E

    W. Thielicke and E. J. Stamhuis, PIVlab – Towards User- friendly, Affordable and Accurate Digital Particle Image Velocimetry in MATLAB, J. Open Res. Softw.2, e30 (2014)

    2014

  36. [41]

    S. P. Carrington and J. A. Odell, How do polymers stretch in stagnation point extensional flow-fields?, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech.67, 269 (1996)

    1996

  37. [42]

    S. J. Haward and G. H. McKinley, Instabilities in stag- nation point flows of polymer solutions, Phys. Fluids25, 083104 (2013)

    2013

  38. [43]

    S. J. Haward, Microfluidic extensional rheometry us- ing stagnation point flow, Biomicrofluidics10, 043401 (2016)

    2016

  39. [44]

    S. J. Haward, M. S. N. Oliveira, M. A. Alves, and G. H. McKinley, Optimized Cross-Slot Flow Geometry for Mi- crofluidic Extensional Rheometry, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 128301 (2012)

    2012

  40. [45]

    F. J. Galindo-Rosales, M. S. N. Oliveira, and M. A. Alves, Optimized cross-slot microdevices for homogeneous ex- tension, RSC Adv.4, 7799 (2014)

    2014

  41. [46]

    R. I. Al-Raoush and C. S. Willson, Extraction of physically realistic pore network properties from three- dimensional synchrotron X-ray microtomography images of unconsolidated porous media systems, J. Hydrol.300, 44 (2005)

    2005

  42. [47]

    K. E. Thompson, C. S. Willson, C. D. White, S. Ny- man, J. Bhattacharya, and A. H. Reed, Application of a new grain-based reconstruction algorithm to microto- mography images for quantitative characterization and flow modeling, inSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition(2005) pp. SPE–95887–MS

    2005

  43. [50]

    A. S. Lodge, A network theory of flow birefringence and stress in concentrated polymer solutions, Trans. Faraday Soc.52, 120 (1956)

    1956

  44. [51]

    Janeschitz-Kriegl, Flow birefringence of elastico- viscous polymer systems, inFortschritte der Hochpolymeren-Forschung, Vol

    H. Janeschitz-Kriegl, Flow birefringence of elastico- viscous polymer systems, inFortschritte der Hochpolymeren-Forschung, Vol. 6/2, edited by H. J. Cantow, G. Dall’Asta, J. D. Ferry, H. Fujita, W. Kern, G. Natta, S. Okamura, C. G. Overberger, W. Prins, G. V. Schulz, W. P. Slichter, A. J. Staverman, J. K. Stille, and H. A. Stuart (Springer Berlin Heidelbe...

    1969

  45. [52]

    Sridhar, D

    T. Sridhar, D. A. Nguyen, and G. G. Fuller, Birefrin- gence and stress growth in uniaxial extension of polymer solutions, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech.90, 299 (2000)

    2000

  46. [53]

    J. P. Rothstein and G. H. McKinley, A comparison of the stress and birefringence growth of dilute, semi- dilute and concentrated polymer solutions in uniaxial ex- tensional flows, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech.108, 275 (2002)

    2002

  47. [54]

    P. T. Corona, B. Berke, M. Guizar-Sicairos, L. G. Leal, M. Liebi, and M. E. Helgeson, Fingerprinting soft ma- terial nanostructure response to complex flow histories, Phys. Rev. Materials6, 045603 (2022)

    2022

  48. [57]

    R. H. Ewoldt and C. Saengow, Designing Complex Flu- ids, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.54, 413 (2022)

    2022

  49. [58]

    J. A. Richards, D. J. M. Hodgson, R. E. O’Neill, M. E. DeRosa, and W. C. K. Poon, Optimizing non-Newtonian fluids for impact protection of laminates, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.121, e2317832121 (2024)

    2024

  50. [59]

    H. A. Stone, A. D. Stroock, and A. Ajdari, Engineering Flows in Small Devices: Microfluidics Toward a Lab-on- a-Chip, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.36, 381 (2004)

    2004

  51. [60]

    flow-thickening

    C. A. Browne, A. Shih, and S. S. Datta, Pore-Scale Flow Characterization of Polymer Solutions in Microflu- idic Porous Media, Small16, 1903944 (2020). 9 Supplementary Material:Polymer extension at stagnation points governs flow thickening of polymer solutions in ordered porous media Emily Y. Chen 1, Simon J. Haward 2, Amy Q. Shen 2 and Sujit S. Datta 3,1 ...

    2020

  52. [61]

    A. V. Dobrynin, R. H. Colby, and M. Rubinstein, Scaling Theory of Polyelectrolyte Solutions, Macromolecules28, 1859 (1995)

    1995

  53. [62]

    C. A. Browne and S. S. Datta, Elastic turbulence generates anomalous flow resistance in porous media, Sci. Adv.7, 11 (2021)

    2021

  54. [63]

    E. S. G. Shaqfeh, Purely Elastic Instabilities in Viscometric Flows, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.28, 129 (1996)

    1996

  55. [64]

    R. G. Larson, Instabilities in viscoelastic flows, Rheol. Acta31, 213 (1992)

    1992

  56. [65]

    A. M. Howe, A. Clarke, and D. Giernalczyk, Flow of concentrated viscoelastic polymer solutions in porous media: effect of MW and concentration on elastic turbulence onset in various geometries, Soft Matter11, 6419 (2015)

    2015

  57. [66]

    Casanellas, M

    L. Casanellas, M. A. Alves, R. J. Poole, S. Lerouge, and A. Lindner, The stabilizing effect of shear thinning on the onset of purely elastic instabilities in serpentine microflows, Soft Matter12, 6167 (2016)

    2016

  58. [67]

    M. I. Kolte and P. Szabo, Capillary thinning of polymeric filaments, J. Rheol.43, 609 (1999)

    1999

  59. [68]

    S. L. Anna and G. H. McKinley, Elasto-capillary thinning and breakup of model elastic liquids, J. Rheol.45, 115 (2001)

    2001

  60. [69]

    V. M. Entov and E. J. Hinch, Effect of a spectrum of relaxation times on the capillary thinning of a filament of elastic liquid, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech.72, 31 (1997)

    1997

  61. [70]

    D. M. Walkama, N. Waisbord, and J. S. Guasto, Disorder Suppresses Chaos in Viscoelastic Flows, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 164501 (2020)

    2020

  62. [71]

    S. J. Haward, C. C. Hopkins, and A. Q. Shen, Stagnation points control chaotic fluctuations in viscoelastic porous media flow, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA118, e2111651118 (2021)

    2021

  63. [72]

    D. W. Carlson, K. Toda-Peters, A. Q. Shen, and S. J. Haward, Volumetric evolution of elastic turbulence in porous media, J. Fluid Mech.950, A36 (2022)

    2022

  64. [73]

    Mitchell, K

    J. Mitchell, K. Lyons, A. M. Howe, and A. Clarke, Viscoelastic polymer flows and elastic turbulence in three-dimensional porous structures, Soft Matter12, 460 (2016)

    2016

  65. [74]

    Zami-Pierre, R

    F. Zami-Pierre, R. de Loubens, M. Quintard, and Y. Davit, Transition in the Flow of Power-Law Fluids through Isotropic Porous Media, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 074502 (2016)

    2016

  66. [75]

    Berg and J

    S. Berg and J. van Wunnik, Shear Rate Determination from Pore-Scale Flow Fields, Transp Porous Med117, 229 (2017)

    2017

  67. [76]

    Thielicke and E

    W. Thielicke and E. J. Stamhuis, PIVlab – Towards User-friendly, Affordable and Accurate Digital Particle Image Ve- locimetry in MATLAB, J. Open Res. Softw.2, e30 (2014)

    2014

  68. [77]

    F. T. Trouton, On the coefficient of viscous traction and its relation to that of viscosity., Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A77, 426 (1906)

    1906

  69. [78]

    C. J. S. Petrie, Extensional viscosity: A critical discussion, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech.137, 15 (2006)

    2006

  70. [79]

    S. J. Haward, S. Varchanis, G. H. McKinley, M. A. Alves, and A. Q. Shen, Extensional rheometry of mobile fluids. Part II: Comparison between the uniaxial, planar, and biaxial extensional rheology of dilute polymer solutions using numerically optimized stagnation point microfluidic devices, J. Rheol.67, 1011 (2023)

    2023

  71. [80]

    C. W. Macosko,Rheology: principles, measurements, and applications, Advances in interfacial engineering series (VCH, New York, 1994)

    1994

  72. [81]

    R. G. Larson,The Structure and Rheology of Complex Fluids(Oxford University Press, 1999)

    1999

  73. [82]

    G. H. McKinley and T. Sridhar, Filament-Stretching Rheometry of Complex Fluids, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.34, 375 (2002)

    2002

  74. [83]

    P. T. Corona, B. Berke, M. Guizar-Sicairos, L. G. Leal, M. Liebi, and M. E. Helgeson, Fingerprinting soft material nanostructure response to complex flow histories, Phys. Rev. Materials6, 045603 (2022)

    2022

  75. [84]

    Kumar, J

    M. Kumar, J. S. Guasto, and A. M. Ardekani, Lagrangian stretching reveals stress topology in viscoelastic flows, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.120, e2211347120 (2023)

    2023

  76. [85]

    Kumar, D

    M. Kumar, D. M. Walkama, A. M. Ardekani, and J. S. Guasto, Stress and stretching regulate dispersion in viscoelastic porous media flows, Soft Matter19, 6761 (2023)

    2023

  77. [86]

    R. B. Bird, R. C. Armstrong, and O. Hassager,Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids: Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 1 (Wiley Interscience, 1987)

    1987

  78. [87]

    Maklad and R

    O. Maklad and R. J. Poole, A review of the second normal-stress difference; its importance in various flows, measurement techniques, results for various complex fluids and theoretical predictions, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech.292, 104522 (2021)

    2021

  79. [88]

    P. G. De Gennes, Coil-stretch transition of dilute flexible polymers under ultrahigh velocity gradients, J. Chem. Phys.60, 14 (1974)

    1974

  80. [89]

    T. T. Perkins, D. E. Smith, and S. Chu, Single Polymer Dynamics in an Elongational Flow, Science276, 2016 (1997)

    2016

Showing first 80 references.