pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.27830 · v1 · pith:WAIONRGEnew · submitted 2026-05-27 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall· physics.app-ph

Magneto-Optical Detection of Anisotropic Spin Currents in Altermagnetic RuO2

Joongwon Lee , Jeonglyul Kim , Sreejith Nair , Seung Gyo Jeong , Changi Kim , Jae-Pil So , Bohm-Jung Yang , Bharat Jalan
show 4 more authors
Hyobin Yoo Farhan Rana Taekoo Oh Hong-Gyu Park
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 11:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.app-ph
keywords altermagnetsRuO2spin-splitter effectmagneto-optical Kerr effectsecond-harmonic generationNéel orderspin currentanisotropic spin polarization
0
0 comments X

The pith

In 12-nm RuO2, applied current generates strong spin polarization only along [010] and none along [-101], matching altermagnetic spin-splitter symmetry.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that a 12-nm-thick RuO2 film sustains altermagnetic Néel order sufficient to produce directionally anisotropic spin currents. Polarization-resolved second-harmonic generation confirms the surface symmetry and magnetic order, while current-driven measurements with both second-harmonic generation and polar magneto-optical Kerr effect show large spin polarization signals for current along [010] that are strongly suppressed along [-101]. This pattern follows the symmetry expected for the altermagnetic spin-splitter effect and is inconsistent with non-magnetic or Rashba-type contributions. Scanning transmission electron microscopy indicates that strain remains in the film, offering one route by which the order persists at this thickness. The results position RuO2 as a metallic spin source for devices that do not require external magnetic fields.

Core claim

Under an applied current, both second-harmonic generation and polar magneto-optical Kerr effect measurements detect a pronounced, directionally anisotropic spin polarization in the 12-nm (101)-oriented RuO2 film, exhibiting enhanced signals for current along [010] and strongly suppressed responses for current along [-101], in agreement with the symmetry of the altermagnetic spin-splitter effect.

What carries the argument

Altermagnetic spin-splitter effect, the mechanism by which collinear antiferromagnetic order with specific crystal symmetry converts charge current into spin current whose polarization direction depends on the current axis relative to the Néel vector.

If this is right

  • RuO2 functions as an efficient metallic spin source at thicknesses compatible with device fabrication.
  • Altermagnets enable field-free spintronic operation because the generated spin current is set by crystal symmetry alone.
  • Optical second-harmonic generation and Kerr effect can serve as non-contact probes of current-induced spin accumulation in altermagnetic films.
  • Persistent strain in relatively thick RuO2 films can stabilize the magnetic order needed for the spin-splitter effect.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same optical methods could be applied to other predicted altermagnets to test whether their spin-splitter response survives at device-relevant thicknesses.
  • If the strain-stabilized order proves general, altermagnetic layers could be integrated into heterostructures without requiring epitaxial matching to ultrathin limits.
  • The directional selectivity implies that device layouts can be engineered to turn spin injection on or off simply by rotating the current direction relative to the crystal axes.

Load-bearing premise

The 12-nm film sustains robust Néel order with the predicted altermagnetic spin splitting, and the observed symmetry-selective response cannot be produced by non-magnetic or Rashba-type mechanisms.

What would settle it

Detection of isotropic or direction-independent spin polarization under current, or a response whose angular dependence matches Rashba rather than altermagnetic symmetry, would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.27830 by Bharat Jalan, Bohm-Jung Yang, Changi Kim, Farhan Rana, Hong-Gyu Park, Hyobin Yoo, Jae-Pil So, Jeonglyul Kim, Joongwon Lee, Seung Gyo Jeong, Sreejith Nair, Taekoo Oh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Crystal symmetry and optical detection scheme. a, Crystallographic and magnetic structures of RuO2. Gray and red spheres denote Ru and O atoms, respectively, and green arrows indicate the Ru magnetic moments. b, Schematic spin-split Fermi surfaces of RuO2, showing spin￾up (𝜎↑ , blue) and spin-down (𝜎↓ , red) states. The dotted and solid lines represent the equilibrium and current-shifted nonequilibrium dis… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: SHG measurements of Nèel order. a, Schematic diagram of the SHG setup. A half-wave plate and a polarizer are used to control and analyze the polarization states of the incident fundamental beam and the emitted SHG signal, respectively. Inset: Scanning SHG image. Scale bar, 10 μm. b, Polarization-resolved SHG patterns for analyzer angles (β) of 0°, 45°, 90°, and 135° [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: MOKE measurements of the ASSE. a, Schematic of the MOKE setup. b, MOKE signal as a function of applied current for conduction channels along the [010] direction (θ = 0°, top) and the [1̅01] direction (θ = 90°, bottom). Black and red circles represent in-phase and quadrature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: STEM imaging of thin-film strain. a, Virtual annular dark-field (VADF) image generated from 4D STEM data. Scale bar, 20 nm. The inset shows an averaged NBED pattern, with the virtual annual detector indicated with a yellow annulus. Scale bar, 2 nm-1 . b, Spatial distribution map of the three structural clusters (Clusters 1–3; top) and their corresponding averaged NBED patterns (bottom). Scale bars, 20 nm (… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Altermagnets are a recently identified class of collinear antiferromagnets that host large spin-split electronic bands, offering a promising platform for efficient spin-current generation. Among proposed candidates, the metallic oxide RuO2 is predicted to exhibit strong altermagnetic spin splitting; however, whether it sustains robust magnetic order beyond the ultrathin thickness limit remains unresolved. Here, we employ optical probes to investigate charge-to-spin conversion in a 12-nm-thick (101)-oriented RuO2 film grown on sapphire. Polarization-resolved second-harmonic generation reveals nonlinear optical responses consistent with the surface symmetry and N\'eel order of RuO2. Under an applied current, both second-harmonic generation and polar magneto-optical Kerr effect measurements detect a pronounced, directionally anisotropic spin polarization, exhibiting enhanced signals for current along [010] and strongly suppressed responses for current along [-101], in agreement with the symmetry of the altermagnetic spin-splitter effect. Non-magnetic or Rashba-type mechanisms cannot explain this symmetry-selective response. Scanning transmission electron microscopy further reveals that substantial strain persists even in relatively thick films, providing a possible explanation for the observed behavior. Therefore, these results establish RuO2 as an efficient spin source and demonstrate the potential of altermagnets for field-free spintronic devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports that polarization-resolved second-harmonic generation (SHG) and current-induced polar magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) measurements on a 12-nm-thick (101)-oriented RuO2 film on sapphire detect a pronounced, directionally anisotropic spin polarization under applied current, with enhanced signals for J ∥ [010] and suppressed responses for J ∥ [-101]. This anisotropy is attributed to the altermagnetic spin-splitter effect, with scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) showing persistent strain as a possible stabilizer of Néel order beyond the ultrathin limit. The authors conclude that non-magnetic or Rashba mechanisms cannot account for the symmetry-selective response, positioning RuO2 as an efficient spin source for field-free spintronics.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work would provide optical evidence for altermagnetic spin splitting and charge-to-spin conversion in relatively thick RuO2 films, extending prior ultrathin-limit results and demonstrating a practical route to anisotropic spin sources. The symmetry-selective optical detection method itself is a potentially useful addition to the toolkit for probing altermagnets.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and discussion of film thickness and strain] The central claim that the 12-nm film sustains robust Néel order with the predicted altermagnetic spin splitting rests on qualitative symmetry matching of the SHG/MOKE signals plus observation of strain in STEM; no direct probe of the order parameter (XMLD, neutron diffraction) or temperature dependence through the putative TN is described, leaving the magnetic origin as an inference rather than a measurement.
  2. [Results on current-induced signals] The statement that non-magnetic or Rashba-type mechanisms cannot produce the observed directional selectivity (enhanced for [010], suppressed for [-101]) is asserted without quantitative modeling of expected Kerr rotation or SHG intensity from altermagnetic bands versus alternative mechanisms, making it difficult to assess whether the symmetry match is unique.
  3. [Experimental methods and figures] No error bars, raw data traces, or detailed methods for the SHG and MOKE measurements are referenced in the provided text, preventing assessment of signal-to-noise or reproducibility of the anisotropy.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for crystal directions (e.g., [010], [-101]) should be consistently defined with respect to the (101) film orientation early in the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We respond point by point to the major comments and indicate where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and discussion of film thickness and strain] The central claim that the 12-nm film sustains robust Néel order with the predicted altermagnetic spin splitting rests on qualitative symmetry matching of the SHG/MOKE signals plus observation of strain in STEM; no direct probe of the order parameter (XMLD, neutron diffraction) or temperature dependence through the putative TN is described, leaving the magnetic origin as an inference rather than a measurement.

    Authors: We agree that the presence of Néel order is inferred from the symmetry of the optical signals and the persistence of strain in STEM rather than from direct probes such as XMLD or neutron diffraction, and that temperature dependence across TN is not reported. This is a genuine limitation of the present optical-focused study. We will revise the discussion section to state explicitly that the magnetic order is inferred and to note the absence of direct probes as an avenue for future confirmation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on current-induced signals] The statement that non-magnetic or Rashba-type mechanisms cannot produce the observed directional selectivity (enhanced for [010], suppressed for [-101]) is asserted without quantitative modeling of expected Kerr rotation or SHG intensity from altermagnetic bands versus alternative mechanisms, making it difficult to assess whether the symmetry match is unique.

    Authors: The directional selectivity follows directly from the altermagnetic spin-splitter symmetry and is incompatible with Rashba or non-magnetic mechanisms on symmetry grounds alone. While we have not performed quantitative modeling of Kerr rotation magnitudes, the observed pattern (enhanced for J ∥ [010], suppressed for J ∥ [-101]) is a qualitative symmetry signature. We will add a supplementary note providing the group-theoretical reasoning that demonstrates why alternative mechanisms cannot reproduce this anisotropy. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Experimental methods and figures] No error bars, raw data traces, or detailed methods for the SHG and MOKE measurements are referenced in the provided text, preventing assessment of signal-to-noise or reproducibility.

    Authors: The full manuscript includes error bars on the plotted data, raw traces, and detailed experimental methods in the supplementary information. We will revise the main text to add explicit references to these elements so that signal-to-noise and reproducibility can be evaluated directly from the manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental observations compared to external predictions

full rationale

This is an experimental report presenting SHG and polar MOKE measurements on a 12-nm RuO2 film. The central claims rest on observed directional anisotropy (enhanced for J ∥ [010], suppressed for J ∥ [-101]) matching the symmetry of altermagnetic spin-splitter effect from prior external theory. No mathematical derivation chain, fitted parameters, or self-defined quantities exist within the paper; symmetry matching is to independent predictions rather than reducing to inputs defined here. No self-citation load-bearing steps or ansatz smuggling are present. The result is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is experimental and relies on standard condensed-matter symmetry arguments and optical response assumptions rather than new postulates or fitted parameters.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard assumptions about crystal symmetry, optical selection rules, and distinction between altermagnetic, Rashba, and non-magnetic spin effects hold for the (101) RuO2 surface.
    Invoked to interpret the direction-dependent signals as altermagnetic rather than alternative mechanisms.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5823 in / 1302 out tokens · 43511 ms · 2026-06-29T11:46:25.843530+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2023)

    2023

  2. [2]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging Research Landscape of Altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  3. [3]

    Gomonay, V

    O. Gomonay, V. P. Kravchuk, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, K. V. Yershov, T. Jungwirth, L. Šmejkal, J. van den Brink, and J. Sinova, Structure, Control, and Dynamics of Altermagnetic Textures, npj Spintron. 2, 35 (2024)

    2024

  4. [4]

    Berlijn, P

    T. Berlijn, P. Snijders, O. Delaire, H. -D. Zhou, T. Maier, H. -B. Cao, S.-X. Chi, M. Matsuda, Y. Wang, M. Koehler, P. C. Kent, and H.Weitering, Itinerant Antiferromagnetism in RuO 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 077201 (2017)

    2017

  5. [5]

    Z. H. Zhu, J. Strempfer, R. R. Rao, C. A. Occhialini, J. Pelliciari, Y. Choi, T. Kawaguchi, H. You, J. F. Mitchell, Y. Shao- Horn, and R. Comin, Anomalous Antiferromagnetism in Metallic RuO2 Determined by Resonant X-ray Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 017202 (2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    Šmejkal, R

    L. Šmejkal, R. Gonzalez -Hernandez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal Time-reversal Symmetry Breaking and Spontaneous Hall Effect in Collinear Antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv. 6, eeaz8809 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    Ryden, and A

    W. Ryden, and A. Lawson, Electrical Transport Properties of IrO2 and RuO2, Phys. Rev. B 1, 1494 (1970)

    1970

  8. [8]

    Karube, T

    S. Karube, T. Tanaka, D. Sugawara, N. Kadoguchi, M. Kohda, and J. Nitta, Observation and Spin-Splitter Torque in Collinear Antiferromagnetic RuO 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 137201 (2022)

    2022

  9. [9]

    S. G. Jeong, I. H. Choi, S. Nair, L. Buiaelli, B. Pourbahari, J. Y. Oh, B. Y. X. Lin, J. M. LeBeau, N. Bassim, D. Hirai, A. Seo, W. S. Choi, R. M. Fernandes, T. Birol, L. Zhao, J. S. Lee, and B. Jalan, Altermagnetic Polar Metallic Phase in Ultrathin Epitaxially Strained RuO2 Films, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 123, e2526641123 (2026)

    2026

  10. [10]

    K.-H. Ahn, A. Ariki, K. -W. Lee, and J. Kuneš, Antiferromagnetism in RuO 2 as d -wave Pomeranchuck instability, Phys. Rev. B 99, 184432 (2019). 21

    2019

  11. [11]

    A. Bose, N. J. Schreiber, R. Jain, D.-F. Shao, H. P. Nair, J. Sun, X. S. Zhang, D. A. Muller, E. Y. Tsymbal, D. G. Schlom, and D. C. Ralph, Tilted Spin Current Generated by the Collinear Antiferromagnet Ruthenium Dioxide, Nat. Electron. 5, 267 (2022)

    2022

  12. [12]

    Gonzalez-Hernandez, L

    R. Gonzalez-Hernandez, L. Šmejkal, K. Vyborny, Y. Yahagi, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and J. Želenzny, Efficient Electrical Spin Splitter Based on Nonrelativistic Collinear Antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 127701 (2021)

    2021

  13. [13]

    J. Liu, J. Zhan, T. Li, J. Liu, S. Cheng, Y. Shi, L. Deng, M. Zhang, C. Li, J. Ding, Q. Jiang, M. Ye, Z. Liu, Z. Jiang, S. Wang, Q. Li, Y. Xie, Y. Wang, S. Qiao, J. Wen, Y. Sun, and D. Shen, Absence of Altermagnetic Spin Splitting Character in Rutile Oxide RuO2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 176401 (2024)

    2024

  14. [14]

    Keßler, L

    P. Keßler, L. Garcia-Gassull, A. Suter, T. Prokscha, Z. Salman, D. Khalyavin, P. Manuel, F. Orlandi, I. I. Mazin, R. Valentí, and S. Moser, Absence of Magnetic Order in RuO2: Insights from μSR Spectroscopy and Neutron Diffraction. npj Spintron. 2, 50 (2024)

    2024

  15. [15]

    Zhang, S

    Y. Zhang, S. G. Jeong, L. Buiarelli, S. Lee, Y. Guo, J. Wen, H. Li, S. Nair, I. H. Choi, Z. Ren, Z. Yue, A. Fedorov, S -K. Mo, J. Kono, J. S. Lee, T. Low, T. Birol, R. M. Fernandes, M. Radovic, B. Jalan, and M. Yi, Observation of Mirror -Odd and Mirror -Even Spin Texture in Ultra-Thin Epitaxially-Strained RuO2 films, arXiv:2509.16361 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  16. [16]

    S. G. Jeong, S. Lee, J. Y. Oh, B. Y.X. Lin, A. Santhosh, J. M. LeBeau, A. J. Grutter, W. S. Choi, T. Low, V. Lauter, and B. Jalan, Emergence of Unconventional Magnetic Order in Strain-Engineered RuO2/TiO2 Superlattices, arXiv:2601.10518 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  17. [17]

    H. Bai, L. Han, X. Y. Feng, Y. J. Zhou, R. X. Su, Q.Wang, L. Y. Liao, W. X. Zhu, X. Z. Chen, F. Pan, X. L. Fan, and C. Song, Observation and Spin Splitting Torque in a Collinear Antiferromagnet RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 197202 (2022)

    2022

  18. [18]

    H. Bai, Y. C. Chang, Y. J. Zhou, P. Chen, C. H. Wan, L. Han, W. X. Zhu, S. X. Liang, Y. C. Su, X. F. Han, F. Pan, and C. Song, Efficient Spin -to-Charge Conversion via Altermagnetic Spin Splitting Effect in Antiferromagnet RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 216701 (2023)

    2023

  19. [19]

    Y. Liu, H. Bai, Y. Song, Z. Ji, S. Lou, Z. Zhang, C. Song, and Q. Jin, Inverse Altermagnetic Spin Splitting Effect -Induced Terahertz Emission in RuO 2, Adv. Opt . Mater. 11, 230017 (2023). 22

    2023

  20. [20]

    H. Jung, G. So, S. Noh, G-H. Kim, J. Lee, J. Lee, S. Lee, U. Seo, D -S. Han, Y. S. Oh, H. Jin, C. Sohn, and J-W. Yoo, Reversible Spin Splitting Effect in Altermagnetic RuO 2 Thin Films, Nano Lett. 25, 16985-16991 (2025)

    2025

  21. [21]

    S. G. Jeong, S. Lee, B. Lin. Z. Yang, I. H. Choi, J. Y. Oh, S. Song, S. Lee, S. Nair, R. Choudhary, J. Parikh, S. Park, W. S. Choi, J. S. Lee, J. M. LeBeau, T. Low , and B. Jalan, Metallicity and Anomalous Hall Effect in Epitaxially Strained, Atomically Thin RuO2 Films, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 122, e2500831122 (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    I. H. Choi, S. G. Jeong, B. Jalan, and J. S. Lee, Exploring Altermagnetism in RuO 2: From Conflicting Experiments To Emerging Consensus, Nano Convergence 13, 1 (2026)

    2026

  23. [23]

    J. D. S. Forte, S. G. Jeong, A. Santhosh, S . Lee, B. Jalan, and T. Low, Strain Engineering of Altermagnetic Symmetry in Epitaxial RuO2 Films, arXiv:2510.26581 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    I. H. Choi, S. G. Jeong, J. H. Lee, S. Kang, S. Nair, C. Kim, D. Wulferding, B. Jalan, and J. S. Lee, Strain -induced Dynamic Spin -Phonon Coupling in Epitaxial RuO 2 Films, arXiv:2509.23969 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Zhang, H

    Y. Zhang, H. Bai, L. Han, C. Chen, Y. Zhou, C. H. Back, F. Pan, Y. Wang , and C. Song, Simultaneously High Chage-Spin Conversion Efficiency and Large Spin Diffusion Length in Altermagnetic RuO2, Adv. Func. Mater. 34, 2313332 (2024)

    2024

  26. [27]

    W. H. Strehlow, and E. L. Cook, Compilation of Energy Band Gaps in Elemental and Binary Compound Semiconductors and Insulators, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 2, 163-200 (1973)

    1973

  27. [28]

    J. Lee, Z. Zhang, H. G. Xing, D. Jena, and F. Rana, Antiferromagnetic Spin Orientation and Magnetic Domain Structure in Eptiaxially Grown MnN Studied Using Optical Second - Harmonic Generation, Phys. Rev. Applied 18, 034020 (2022)

    2022

  28. [29]

    K. Lee, A. H. Dismukes, E. J. Telford, R. A. Wiscons, J. Wang, X. Xu, C. Nuckolls, C. R. Dean, X. Roy, and X. Zhu, Magnetic Order and Symmetry in the 2D Semiconductor CrSBr, Nano Lett. 21, 3511-3517 (2021)

    2021

  29. [30]

    Fiebig, D

    M. Fiebig, D. Fröhlich, Th. Lottermoser, V. V. Pavlov, R. V. Pisarev, and H.-J. Weber, Second Harmonic Generation in the Centrosymmetric Antiferromagnet NiO, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 137202 (2001) 23

    2001

  30. [31]

    Kirilyuk , and T

    A. Kirilyuk , and T. Rasing, Magnetization -induced-second-harmonic-generation from Surfaces and Interfaces, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 22, 148-167 (2005)

    2005

  31. [32]

    Pattabi, Z

    A. Pattabi, Z. Gu, J. Gorchon, Y. Yang, J. Finley, O. J. Lee, H. A. Raziq, S. Salahuddin, and J. Bokor, Direct Optical Detection of Current Induced Spin Accumulation in Metals by Magnetization-induced Second Harmonic Generation, Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 152404 (2015)

    2015

  32. [33]

    Sinova, S

    J. Sinova, S. O. Valenzuela, J. Wunderlich, C. H. Back , and T. Jungwirth, Spin Hall Effects, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1213 (2015)

    2015

  33. [35]

    V. Sih, R. C. Myers, Y. K. Kato, W. H. Lau, A. C. Gossard, and D. D. Awschalom, Spatial Imaging of the Spin Hall Effect and Current-induced Polarization in Two-dimensional Electron Gases, Nat. Phys. 1, 31 (2005)

    2005

  34. [36]

    Y. K. Kato, R. C. Myers, A. C. Gossard, and D. D. Awschalom, Observation of the Spin Hall Effect in Semiconductors, Science 306, 1910 (2004)

    1910

  35. [38]

    Valet, and A

    T. Valet, and A. Fert, Theory of the Perpendicular Magnetoresistance in Magnetic Multilayers, Phys. Rev. B 48, 7099 (1993)

    1993

  36. [39]

    I. Gray, T. Moriyama, N. Sivadas, G. M. Stiehl, J. T. Heron, R. Need, B. J. Kirby, D. H. Low, K. C. Nowack, D. G. Schlom, D. C. Ralph, T. Ono, and G. D. Fuchs, Spin Seebeck Imaging of Spin -Torque Switching in Antiferromagnetic Pt/NiO Heterostructures. Phys. Rev. X 9, 041016 (2019)

    2019

  37. [40]

    Sorn, and Y

    S. Sorn, and Y. Mokrousov, Activation of Anomalous Hall Effect and Orbital Magnetization by Domain Walls in Altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 112, 245115 (2025)

    2025

  38. [41]

    W. Nunn, S. Nair, H. Yun, A. K. Manjeshwar, A. Rajapitamahuni, D. Lee, K. A. Mkhoyan, and B. Jalan, Solid -source Metal-organic Molecular Beam Epitaxy of Epitaxial RuO 2, APL Mater. 9, 091112 (2021)

    2021

  39. [42]

    M. W. Tate, P. Purohit, D. Chamberlain, K. X. Nguyen, R. Hovden, C. S. Chang, P. Deb, E. Turgut, J. T. Heron, D. G. Schlom, D. C. Ralph, G. D. Fuchs, K. S. Shanks, H. T. Philipp, D. 24 A. Muller, and S. M. Gruner, High Dynamic Range Pixel Array Detector for Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy, Microsc. Microanal. 22, 237 (2016)

    2016

  40. [43]

    B. H. Savitzky, S. E. Zeltmann, L. A. Hughes, H. G. Brown, S. Zhao, P. M. Pelz, T. C. Pekin, E. S. Barnard, J. Donohue, L. R. DaCosta, E. Kennedy, Y. Xie, M. T. Janish, M. M. Schneider, P. Herring, C. Gopal, A. Anapolsky, R. Dhall, K. C. Bustillo, P. Ercius, M. C. Scott, J. Ciston, A. M. Minor, and C. Ophus, py4DSTEM: A Software Package for Four-Dimension...

    2021

  41. [44]

    Structural characterization Fig. S1. Structural characterization of the RuO2 film. a, θ–2θ X-ray diffraction (XRD) scan of a RuO 2 film grown on an r-plane sapphire substrate. b, Cross-sectional high -resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) image of the heterostructure. c-e, Fast Fourier transform (FFT) patterns corresponding to the color-code...

  42. [45]

    SHG and MOKE tensors for surface-normal incidence In isotropic materials possessing C2v symmetry, the linear and nonlinear magneto -optical responses are governed by 𝑃⃗ (𝜔)= 𝜀0 ( 𝜀𝑥𝑥 𝑖𝑄𝑀𝑧 −𝑖𝑄𝑀𝑦 −𝑖𝑄𝑀𝑧 𝜀𝑦𝑦 −𝑖𝑄𝑀𝑥 𝑖𝑄𝑀𝑦 −𝑖𝑄𝑀𝑥 𝜀𝑧𝑧 )𝐸⃗ , 𝑃⃗ (2𝜔)= 𝜀0( 𝜂𝑥𝑥𝑥𝑦𝑀𝑦 𝜂𝑥𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑀𝑦 𝜂𝑥𝑧𝑧𝑦𝑀𝑦 𝜂𝑥𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑀𝑧 𝜒𝑥𝑥𝑧 𝜂𝑥𝑥𝑦𝑥𝑀𝑥 𝜂𝑦𝑥𝑥𝑥𝑀𝑥 𝜂𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑥𝑀𝑥 𝜂𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑥𝑀𝑥 𝜒𝑦𝑦𝑧 𝜂𝑦𝑥𝑧𝑧𝑀𝑧 𝜂𝑦𝑥𝑦𝑦𝑀𝑦 𝜒𝑧𝑥𝑥 𝜒𝑧𝑦𝑦 𝜒𝑧𝑧𝑧 𝜂𝑧𝑦𝑧𝑥𝑀𝑥 ...

  43. [46]

    Static SHG characterization and symmetry analysis Fig. S2. Static SHG response. a, Power-dependent SHG intensity. Inset: SHG spectrum. b, SHG polar patterns for analyzer angles of 0°, 45°, 90°, and 135° with respect to the [010] axis of RuO2. The azimuthal angle corresponds to the polarizer angle. Black circles represent the measured data, and the red das...

  44. [47]

    Current-polarity dependence of SHG response 34 Fig. S 3. Polarity-dependent SHG response . a,b, Normalized SHG intensity (a) and SHG asymmetry A (b) measured under two opposite current polarities (positive and negative). Black and red circles represent the positive and negative polarities, respectively. In this section, we demonstrate that the observed as...

  45. [48]

    Lock-in measurements to isolate intrinsic MOKE signals from Joule heating effects Fig. S4. Lock-in detection of MOKE signals and separation of thermal contributions . a,b, Measured first-harmonic (f) (a) and second-harmonic (2f) (b) lock-in voltage signals as a function of the applied charge current density (Jc). The primary y-axes show the raw lock-in ou...

  46. [49]

    Raw MOKE signals from devices with various orientations The full current-dependent in-phase and quadrature components for each angle are shown in Fig. S5. While ASSE predicts no spin accumulation for current applied along the [1̅01] direction, we observe a suppressed yet nonzero signal f or the [1̅01] direction (θ = 90°). This may partially stem from the ...

  47. [50]

    Estimation of spin accumulation from MOKE measurements Fig. S6. Band structure and Kerr rotation . a, Spin-resolved band structure of RuO2. Red and blue lines represent energy band s for spin-up and spin-down electrons, respectively. Black lines indicate spin-degenerate bands. b, Estimated spin Hall angle for currents along the [010] and [1̅01] directions...

  48. [51]

    4D-STEM analysis of structural heterogeneity of (101) RuO2 film 43 Fig. S7. 4D-STEM analysis of structural heterogeneity. a-c, Averaged NBED patterns acquired from Clusters 1 ( a), 2 ( b), and 3 ( c). Scale bar, 2 nm -1. d, Averaged line profiles of the NBED intensity for each cluster, extracted from the highlighted regions in a-c. e-g, Simulated NBED pat...

  49. [52]

    O. M. J. van ’t Erve, A. T. Hanbicki, K. M. McCreary, C. H. Li, and B. T. Jonker, Optical Detection of Spin Hall Effect in Metals, Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 174402 (2014)

    2014

  50. [53]

    Y. Su, H. Wang, J. Li, C. Tian, R. Wu, X. Jin, and Y. R. Shen, Absence of Detectable MOKE Signals from Spin Hall Effects in Metals, Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 042401 (2017)

    2017

  51. [54]

    Riego, S

    P. Riego, S. Velez, J. M. Gomez-Perez, J. A. Arregi, L. E. Hueso, F. Casanova, and A. Berger, Absence of Detectable Current-induced Magneto-optical Kerr Effects in Pt, Ta, and W, Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 172402 (2016)

    2016

  52. [55]

    Y. K. Kato, R. C. Myers, A. C. Gossard, and D. D. Awschalom, Observation of the Spin Hall Effect in Semiconductors, Science 306, 1910 (2004). 45

    1910

  53. [56]

    Stamm, C

    C. Stamm, C. Murer, M. Berritta, J. Feng, M. Gabureac, P. M. Oppeneer, and P. Gambardella, Magneto-Optical Detection of the Spin Hall Effect in Pt and W Thin Films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 087203 (2017)

    2017

  54. [57]

    Y. S. Touloukian, R. W. Powell, C. Y. Ho , and P. G. Klemens, Thermophysical Properties of Matter – The TRPC Data Series. Volume 2. Thermal Conductivity – Nonmetallic Solids, IFI/Plenum, New York (1970)

    1970

  55. [58]

    M. Roig, A. Kreisel, Y. Yu, B. M. Anderson, and D. F. Agterberg, Minimal Models for Altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. B 110, 144412 (2024)

    2024