pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.27947 · v1 · pith:7RWOUGGAnew · submitted 2026-05-27 · 💻 cs.RO

SANTS: A State-Adaptive Scheduler for World Action Models

Yirui Sun , Guangyu Zhuge , Keliang Liu , Jie Gu , Xinyu Bing , Zhongxue Gan , Chunxu Tian This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 11:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords world action modelsvideo diffusion policiesadaptive schedulingnoise trajectoryrobot manipulationdenoising depthlatency reductionaction generation
0
0 comments X

The pith

State-adaptive scheduler selects the right denoising depth along the video noise trajectory for each robot state.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

World Action Models condition robot actions on future video predictions from diffusion, yet full denoising is not always best and can add unnecessary cost. Controlled scans reveal that action error improves up to a state-dependent point and may then plateau or worsen. SANTS trains a lightweight model to read the current video-state representation and noise level, then output a stopping hazard and noise-progression ratio. Training uses a path-level reward from the downstream action chunk, so the scheduler targets action quality rather than video fidelity while penalizing extra steps. The result is comparable task success at roughly one-fifth the latency of full denoising.

Core claim

SANTS is a post-trained scheduler for video-to-action diffusion policies. At each decision point it takes the current video-state representation and noise level and jointly predicts a cumulative stopping hazard together with a relative noise-progression ratio. The scheduler is optimized end-to-end with a path-level reward computed after the frozen action branch produces its final action chunk, explicitly penalizing redundant video-state updates. This replaces the fixed terminal denoising depth with a state-dependent stopping rule along the noise trajectory.

What carries the argument

State-Adaptive Noise Trajectory Scheduler (SANTS) that predicts cumulative stopping hazard and relative noise-progression ratio from current video-state representation and noise level.

If this is right

  • Adaptive selection along the video noise trajectory preserves the control benefits of full WAM future reasoning.
  • Redundant video-state updates are removed while downstream action quality remains the training objective.
  • Latency drops 81.7 percent on RoboTwin 2.0 and 79.0 percent on real-robot tasks at 94.4 percent and 73.1 percent success respectively.
  • The scheduler can be post-trained without retraining the underlying video or action networks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar hazard-based early stopping could be tested on non-video diffusion policies where intermediate representations lose task relevance.
  • The approach suggests a general template for trading computation against prediction utility in any generative model used for control.
  • If the reward proxy transfers across environments, the same scheduler architecture might apply to other modalities such as audio or point-cloud futures.

Load-bearing premise

The path-level reward computed after the frozen action branch generates the final action chunk is a faithful proxy for the optimal per-state stopping point along the noise trajectory.

What would settle it

An experiment that compares SANTS-chosen denoising depths against an oracle that selects the depth minimizing downstream action error on held-out tasks; a consistent gap in action error would falsify the scheduler's optimality.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.27947 by Chunxu Tian, Guangyu Zhuge, Jie Gu, Keliang Liu, Xinyu Bing, Yirui Sun, Zhongxue Gan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of SANTS and main results. The left side contrasts SANTS with a full-denoising [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of SANTS. SANTS is attached to a frozen video–action diffusion policy. During [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Effect of video denoising depth on action-generation error. In both panels, colored curves [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Real-robot task sequences on the AgileX bimanual and UR10 kitchen platforms. Colored [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Denoising-budget traces from four closed-loop RoboTwin 2.0 rollouts. The plot shows the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

World Action Models (WAMs) improve robot manipulation by using video-based future representations to condition action generation. In pixel-space WAMs, however, the best action condition is not necessarily the fully denoised video. Controlled denoising-depth scans show that video refinement can reduce action error up to a state-dependent point, after which the gain may saturate or even reverse when late predictions become less action-relevant or physically unreliable. This suggests that action generation should use a state-dependent point along the video noise trajectory rather than a fixed terminal denoising depth. We introduce State-Adaptive Noise Trajectory Scheduler (SANTS), a lightweight scheduler for video-to-action diffusion policies. At each video decision point, SANTS reads the current video-state representation and noise level, then jointly predicts a cumulative stopping hazard and a relative noise-progression ratio. SANTS is post-trained with a path-level reward computed after the frozen action branch generates the final action chunk, so the scheduler is optimized for downstream action quality rather than intermediate video fidelity, while redundant video-state updates are explicitly penalized. Experiments show that SANTS reaches \(94.4\%\) overall success on RoboTwin 2.0 and \(73.1\%\) average success across seven real-robot tasks, while reducing latency by \(81.7\%\) and \(79.0\%\) relative to full video denoising, respectively. These results indicate that adaptive selection along the video noise trajectory can preserve the control benefits of WAM-style future reasoning while removing much of its redundant inference cost.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces SANTS, a lightweight state-adaptive scheduler for video-to-action diffusion policies in World Action Models. It claims that the optimal point along the video noise trajectory for conditioning action generation is state-dependent (as shown by denoising-depth scans where refinement can saturate or reverse), and proposes jointly predicting a cumulative stopping hazard and relative noise-progression ratio from the current video-state representation and noise level. The scheduler is post-trained using a path-level reward derived after the frozen action branch produces the final action chunk, with explicit penalty on redundant updates. Experiments report 94.4% overall success on RoboTwin 2.0 and 73.1% average success on seven real-robot tasks, with latency reductions of 81.7% and 79.0% relative to full denoising.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work could make WAM-style future reasoning more practical for real-time robot control by eliminating redundant inference while retaining performance gains. The post-training on downstream action quality (rather than video fidelity) and the explicit redundancy penalty are positive design choices. No machine-checked proofs or parameter-free derivations are present.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the reported success rates (94.4%, 73.1%) and latency reductions (81.7%, 79.0%) are given without error bars, ablation details, dataset sizes, or statistical tests, so the claim that adaptive stopping is superior cannot be evaluated from the provided evidence.
  2. [Scheduler Training] Scheduler training description: the path-level reward is computed only after the frozen action branch generates the final chunk; no separate validation is provided that the learned hazard/ratio predictions recover the empirically optimal per-state stopping depths from the denoising scans, leaving open the possibility that the reward optimizes aggregate trajectory quality rather than marginal per-state action relevance.
  3. [Experiments] Experiments section: the denoising-depth scans that motivate the state-dependent claim are referenced but lack quantitative details on the number of states evaluated, the exact error curves, or how reversal of action relevance was measured, making it impossible to assess whether the scheduler training objective aligns with those observations.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Notation for the hazard and ratio predictions should be introduced with explicit equations rather than descriptive text only.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and evidence presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the reported success rates (94.4%, 73.1%) and latency reductions (81.7%, 79.0%) are given without error bars, ablation details, dataset sizes, or statistical tests, so the claim that adaptive stopping is superior cannot be evaluated from the provided evidence.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from additional context to support evaluation of the claims. In the revision we will update the abstract to reference error bars (standard deviation over multiple seeds), dataset sizes, the ablation studies already present in the experiments section, and the statistical tests used to compare against fixed-depth baselines. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Scheduler Training] Scheduler training description: the path-level reward is computed only after the frozen action branch generates the final chunk; no separate validation is provided that the learned hazard/ratio predictions recover the empirically optimal per-state stopping depths from the denoising scans, leaving open the possibility that the reward optimizes aggregate trajectory quality rather than marginal per-state action relevance.

    Authors: The path-level reward is computed on the final action chunk precisely so that the scheduler optimizes for downstream action quality rather than video fidelity. We acknowledge the absence of an explicit validation comparing learned stopping depths to the scan optima. In the revision we will add such a validation on a held-out set of states, reporting quantitative alignment between the scheduler predictions and the empirically best depths from the scans. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Experiments] Experiments section: the denoising-depth scans that motivate the state-dependent claim are referenced but lack quantitative details on the number of states evaluated, the exact error curves, or how reversal of action relevance was measured, making it impossible to assess whether the scheduler training objective aligns with those observations.

    Authors: We agree that the motivating scans require more quantitative detail. In the revision we will expand the experiments section to report the number of states evaluated, summarize or display the error curves, and describe the criterion used to identify reversal of action relevance. This will make explicit the alignment between the observed state dependence and the scheduler training objective. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: scheduler training uses independent downstream reward signal

full rationale

The paper's core derivation trains SANTS via a path-level reward computed from the frozen action branch after generating the final action chunk. This is a standard optimization setup that does not reduce the hazard/ratio predictions to a fitted constant by construction, nor does it rely on self-citations, imported uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes smuggled from prior work. The state-dependent stopping decision is justified by external denoising-depth scans and explicit redundancy penalties, remaining self-contained against the target performance metrics. No load-bearing step collapses to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies insufficient detail to enumerate free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the scheduler's hazard and ratio predictors are presumed to contain fitted weights but none are named.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5822 in / 1123 out tokens · 29426 ms · 2026-06-29T11:54:16.696713+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. World Action Models: A Survey

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A survey that clarifies boundaries and organizes World Action Models by generation requirements and predictive substrates, identifying a trend toward generating less of the future.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 26 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    S. Wang, J. Shi, Z. Fu, X. He, F. Liu, C. Yang, Y . Zhou, Z. Fei, J. Gong, J. Fu, M. Z. Shou, X. Huang, X. Qiu, and Y .-G. Jiang. World action models: The next frontier in embodied ai,

  2. [2]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12090

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    C. Zhu, R. Yu, S. Feng, B. Burchfiel, P. Shah, and A. Gupta. Unified world models: Coupling video and action diffusion for pretraining on large robotic datasets, 2025. URLhttps:// arxiv.org/abs/2504.02792

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    L. Li, Q. Zhang, Y . Luo, S. Yang, R. Wang, F. Han, M. Yu, Z. Gao, N. Xue, X. Zhu, Y . Shen, and Y . Xu. Causal world modeling for robot control, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/ 2601.21998

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  5. [5]

    S. Ye, Y . Ge, K. Zheng, S. Gao, S. Yu, G. Kurian, S. Indupuru, Y . L. Tan, C. Zhu, J. Xiang, et al. World action models are zero-shot policies.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.15922, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  6. [6]

    M. J. Kim, Y . Gao, T.-Y . Lin, Y .-C. Lin, Y . Ge, G. Lam, P. Liang, S. Song, M.-Y . Liu, C. Finn, and J. Gu. Cosmos policy: Fine-tuning video models for visuomotor control and planning,

  7. [7]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2601.16163

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    Y . Hu, Y . Guo, P. Wang, X. Chen, Y .-J. Wang, J. Zhang, K. Sreenath, C. Lu, and J. Chen. Video prediction policy: A generalist robot policy with predictive visual representations. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 24328–24346. PMLR, 2025. 9

    2025

  9. [9]

    J. Pai, L. Achenbach, V . Montesinos, B. Forrai, O. Mees, and E. Nava. mimic-video: Video- action models for generalizable robot control beyond vlas, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/ abs/2512.15692

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    T. Ma, J. Zheng, Z. Wang, C. Jiang, A. Cui, J. Liang, and S. Yang. Dit4dit: Jointly modeling video dynamics and actions for generalizable robot control, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv. org/abs/2603.10448

    work page arXiv 2026

  11. [11]

    H. Bi, H. Tan, S. Xie, Z. Wang, S. Huang, H. Liu, R. Zhao, Y . Feng, C. Xiang, Y . Rong, et al. Motus: A unified latent action world model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.13030, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    T. Yuan, Z. Dong, Y . Liu, and H. Zhao. Fast-wam: Do world action models need test-time future imagination?, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16666

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  13. [13]

    Learning Visual Feature-Based World Models via Residual Latent Action

    X. Zhang, Z. Xu, Y . Tao, Y . Wang, Y . She, and A. Boularias. Learning visual feature-based world models via residual latent action, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07079

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  14. [14]

    Sabour, S

    A. Sabour, S. Fidler, and K. Kreis. Align your steps: Optimizing sampling schedules in diffu- sion models, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2404.14507

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Spectrally-Guided Diffusion Noise Schedules

    C. Esteves and A. Makadia. Spectrally-guided diffusion noise schedules, 2026. URLhttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2603.19222

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  16. [16]

    S.-A. Yu, F. Gao, Y . Wu, C. Yu, and Y . Wang. D3p: Dynamic denoising diffusion policy via reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.06804, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    T. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chen, Z. Cai, Y . Liu, Z. Li, Q. Liang, X. Lin, Y . Ge, Z. Gu, W. Deng, Y . Guo, T. Nian, X. Xie, Q. Chen, K. Su, T. Xu, G. Liu, M. Hu, H.-a. Gao, K. Wang, Z. Liang, Y . Qin, X. Yang, P. Luo, and Y . Mu. Robotwin 2.0: A scalable data generator and bench- mark with strong domain randomization for robust bimanual robotic manipulation, 2...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    H. Wu, Y . Jing, C. Cheang, G. Chen, J. Xu, X. Li, M. Liu, H. Li, and T. Kong. Unleashing large-scale video generative pre-training for visual robot manipulation, 2023. URLhttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2312.13139

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    GR-2: A Generative Video-Language-Action Model with Web-Scale Knowledge for Robot Manipulation

    C.-L. Cheang, G. Chen, Y . Jing, T. Kong, H. Li, Y . Li, Y . Liu, H. Wu, J. Xu, Y . Yang, H. Zhang, and M. Zhu. Gr-2: A generative video-language-action model with web-scale knowledge for robot manipulation, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2410.06158

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    J. Cen, C. Yu, H. Yuan, Y . Jiang, S. Huang, J. Guo, X. Li, Y . Song, H. Luo, F. Wang, D. Zhao, and H. Chen. Worldvla: Towards autoregressive action world model, 2025. URLhttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2506.21539

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Q. Feng, J. Yu, J. Liu, Y . Jia, Z. Wu, H. Chen, Z. Qian, S. Gu, P. Jia, S. Ma, and S. Zhang. Harmowam: Harmonizing generalizable and precise manipulation via adaptive world action models, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10942

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  22. [22]

    Finn and S

    C. Finn and S. Levine. Deep visual foresight for planning robot motion. InIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2017

    2017

  23. [23]

    Y . Li, Y . Zhu, J. Wen, C. Shen, and Y . Xu. Worldeval: World model as real-world robot policies evaluator, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2505.19017

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    J. Yang, K. Lin, J. Li, W. Zhang, T. Lin, L. Wu, Z. Su, H. Zhao, Y .-Q. Zhang, L. Chen, P. Luo, X. Yue, and H. Li. Rise: Self-improving robot policy with compositional world model, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11075. 10

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    Y . Wen, J. Lin, Y . Zhu, J. Han, H. Xu, S. Zhao, and X. Liang. Vidman: Exploiting implicit dynamics from video diffusion model for effective robot manipulation, 2024. URLhttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2411.09153

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Routray, H

    S. Routray, H. Pan, U. Jain, S. Bahl, and D. Pathak. Vipra: Video prediction for robot actions,

  27. [27]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2511.07732

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    Y . Li, B. Zhang, C. Gu, Z. Ma, J. Zhang, J. Deng, X. Zhu, and L. Zhang. From imagined futures to executable actions: Mixture of latent actions for robot manipulation, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12167

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    Y . Liu, P. Sun, S. Li, Y . Xie, L. Zhang, X. Chao, S. Dong, F. Chen, X.-P. Zhang, and W. Ding. Oa-wam: Object-addressable world action model for robust robot manipulation, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06481

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    MotuBrain: An Advanced World Action Model for Robot Control

    MotuBrain Team, C. Xiang, F. Bao, H. Liu, H. Tan, H. Bi, J. Li, J. Liu, J. Pang, K. Jing, L. Liu, M. Cai, R. Cui, R. Zhao, R. Wang, S. Huang, Y . Feng, Y . Rong, Z. Wang, and J. Zhu. Motubrain: An advanced world action model for robot control, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv. org/abs/2604.27792

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  31. [31]

    F. Ma, Y . Cheng, X. Jin, W. Chen, J. Ji, C. Wei, Z. Chen, J. Liu, and H. Li. World-guided video- to-action diffusion policy: Efficiently scaling up generalizable robot policies with pretrained video generation models, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2602.22010

    work page arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    H. Yang, Z. Long, Z. Ren, C. Zhou, S. Jin, H. Xu, W. Zhang, B. Cui, and B. Zhou. Being- h0.7: Improving vision-language-action model with video generation, 2026. URLhttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2605.00078

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    J. Song, C. Meng, and S. Ermon. Denoising diffusion implicit models, 2020. URLhttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2010.02502

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  34. [34]

    C. Lu, Y . Zhou, F. Bao, J. Chen, C. Li, and J. Zhu. Dpm-solver: A fast ode solver for dif- fusion probabilistic model sampling in around 10 steps. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022

    2022

  35. [35]

    C. Lu, Y . Zhou, F. Bao, J. Chen, C. Li, and J. Zhu. Dpm-solver++: Fast solver for guided sampling of diffusion probabilistic models, 2022. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2211. 01095

    2022

  36. [36]

    Zheng, C

    K. Zheng, C. Lu, J. Chen, and J. Zhu. Dpm-solver-v3: Improved diffusion ode solver with empirical model statistics, 2023. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2310.13268

    work page arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    J. Guo, Q. Li, P. Li, Z. Chen, N. Sun, Y . Su, H. Wang, Y . Zhang, X. Li, and H. Liu. Unified 4d world action modeling from video priors with asynchronous denoising, 2026. URLhttps: //arxiv.org/abs/2604.26694

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    Y . Jia, J. Liu, S. Liu, R. Zhou, W. Yu, Y . Yan, X. Chi, Y . Guo, B. Shi, and S. Zhang. Video2act: A dual-system video diffusion policy with robotic spatio-motional modeling, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.03044

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    A. Ye, B. Wang, C. Ni, G. Huang, G. Zhao, H. Li, H. Li, J. Li, J. Lv, J. Liu, M. Cao, P. Li, Q. Deng, W. Mei, X. Wang, X. Chen, X. Zhou, Y . Wang, Y . Chang, Y . Li, Y . Zhou, Y . Ye, Z. Liu, and Z. Zhu. Gigaworld-policy: An efficient action-centered world–action model, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2603.17240

    work page arXiv 2026

  40. [40]

    X. Liu, C. Gong, and Q. Liu. Flow straight and fast: Learning to generate and transfer data with rectified flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.03003, 2022

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms

    J. Schulman, F. Wolski, P. Dhariwal, A. Radford, and O. Klimov. Proximal policy optimization algorithms.arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347, 2017. 11

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  42. [42]

    T. Wan, A. Wang, B. Ai, B. Wen, C. Mao, C.-W. Xie, D. Chen, F. Yu, H. Zhao, J. Yang, et al. Wan: Open and advanced large-scale video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20314, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Black, N

    K. Black, N. Brown, J. Darpinian, K. Dhabalia, D. Driess, A. Esmail, M. R. Equi, C. Finn, N. Fusai, M. Y . Galliker, et al.π 0.5: A Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalization. In9th Annual Conference on Robot Learning, 2025

    2025

  44. [44]

    Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization

    I. Loshchilov and F. Hutter. Decoupled weight decay regularization.arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101, 2017. 12 A Real-Robot Evaluation Protocol Figure 4: Real-robot task sequences on the AgileX bimanual and UR10 kitchen platforms. Colored arrows indicate temporal progress for each task. This appendix provides the hardware, observation, control, randomizatio...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017