pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.27967 · v1 · pith:K4WXMVRCnew · submitted 2026-05-27 · 📊 stat.ME · cs.AI· cs.LG· stat.ML

Multi-Teacher Knowledge Distillation via Teacher-Informed Mixture Priors

Luyang Fang , Yongkai Chen , Jiazhang Cai , Ping Ma , Wenxuan Zhong This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 11:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📊 stat.ME cs.AIcs.LGstat.ML
keywords knowledge distillationBayesian knowledge distillationmulti-teachermixture priorsuncertainty quantificationmodel compressionentropy weighting
0
0 comments X

The pith

Multi-teacher Bayesian knowledge distillation uses a teacher-informed mixture prior to improve student accuracy and quantify uncertainty.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents MT-BKD as a Bayesian method for distilling knowledge from multiple teachers into a student model. It incorporates a teacher-informed mixture prior that blends knowledge from the teachers with the training data, along with an entropy-based weighting to balance their influences. This framework aims to make the distillation more interpretable, boost predictive performance, and enable uncertainty estimates. Validation on synthetic data and real tasks such as protein subcellular location prediction and image classification demonstrates these benefits.

Core claim

MT-BKD allows a distilled student model to learn from multiple teachers within the Bayesian framework by leveraging a teacher-informed prior that integrates external knowledge from teacher models and task-specific training data. An entropy-based weighting mechanism adaptively adjusts each teacher's influence. This results in enhanced interpretability of the learning process, improved predictive accuracy, and provision of uncertainty quantification.

What carries the argument

The teacher-informed mixture prior, which serves as the mechanism to integrate knowledge from multiple teachers and data in the Bayesian distillation process.

If this is right

  • The student model effectively combines expertise from diverse teachers without one dominating.
  • Predictions include uncertainty measures suitable for applications needing reliability assessment.
  • Performance improves on tasks like image classification and protein prediction compared to standard distillation.
  • The method scales to complex models including large language models.
  • Robustness and generalization are enhanced through the mixture prior.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach might help in scenarios where teachers disagree by letting the prior and weighting resolve conflicts.
  • Extending the entropy weighting to other Bayesian models could improve ensemble methods in statistics.
  • Applying MT-BKD to sequential data or time-series tasks could test its adaptability further.

Load-bearing premise

The teacher-informed prior integrates knowledge from the teachers and data in a way that improves results without adding biases or needing heavy tuning.

What would settle it

Running MT-BKD and standard distillation on a held-out real-world dataset and finding no gains in accuracy or poorer uncertainty calibration would challenge the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.27967 by Jiazhang Cai, Luyang Fang, Ping Ma, Wenxuan Zhong, Yongkai Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The multiple teacher Bayesian knowledge distillation (MT-BKD) framework. A teacher-informed prior is established for the student model’s parame￾ters based on the predicted probabilities from multiple teacher models, and the posterior distribution is derived. An importance-aware weighting mechanism balances contributions from the teachers. The stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD) method is then appl… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison of posterior distributions obtained through MT-BKD and the es [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Top left panel: Ground truth probability distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of coverage rate of (a) simulation 1 and (b) simulation 2 at three [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Data description. (a) Ten eukaryotic subcellular compartments for the local [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Distribution of log-transformed mean deviance. (a) The first box shows results [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Left panel showcases images with the lowest uncertainty, while the bottom panel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Knowledge distillation is a powerful method for model compression, enabling the efficient deployment of complex deep learning models (teachers), including large language models. However, its underlying statistical mechanisms remain unclear, and uncertainty evaluation is often overlooked, especially in real-world scenarios requiring diverse teacher expertise. To address these challenges, we introduce \textit{Multi-Teacher Bayesian Knowledge Distillation} (MT-BKD), where a distilled student model learns from multiple teachers within the Bayesian framework. Our approach leverages Bayesian inference to capture inherent uncertainty in the distillation process. We introduce a teacher-informed prior, integrating external knowledge from teacher models and task-specific training data, offering better generalization, robustness, and scalability. Additionally, an entropy-based weighting mechanism adaptively adjusts each teacher's influence, allowing the student to combine multiple sources of expertise effectively. MT-BKD enhances the interpretability of the student model's learning process, improves predictive accuracy, and provides uncertainty quantification. We validate MT-BKD on both synthetic and real-world tasks, including protein subcellular location prediction and image classification. Our experiments show improved performance and robust uncertainty quantification, highlighting the strengths of our MT-BKD framework.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Multi-Teacher Bayesian Knowledge Distillation (MT-BKD), a Bayesian framework for distilling knowledge from multiple teachers to a student model. It introduces a teacher-informed mixture prior that integrates external knowledge from teachers and task-specific data, combined with an entropy-based weighting mechanism to adaptively balance teacher influence. The method is claimed to improve generalization, robustness, scalability, interpretability of the learning process, predictive accuracy, and uncertainty quantification. Validation is reported on synthetic data plus two real tasks (protein subcellular location prediction and image classification), with experiments showing improved performance and robust UQ relative to standard distillation.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work supplies a statistically grounded extension of knowledge distillation to the multi-teacher setting, explicitly addressing uncertainty quantification that is frequently omitted in the literature. The teacher-informed prior and entropy weighting provide a mechanism for combining heterogeneous expertise without manual tuning, which could be relevant for compressing large models including LLMs. The empirical validation on both synthetic and applied tasks (protein localization, image classification) supplies concrete evidence of practical utility.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract and introduction would benefit from a concise statement of the precise form of the teacher-informed mixture prior (e.g., whether it is a finite mixture of teacher posteriors or a hierarchical construction) and the exact entropy-weighting formula, to allow readers to assess identifiability and computational cost without reading the full methods section.
  2. In the experimental section, clarify the baseline implementations (standard KD, ensemble averaging, etc.) and report whether the same hyper-parameter search budget was used for all methods; this would strengthen the claim of improved generalization.
  3. Notation for the student posterior and the mixture weights should be introduced once in a dedicated notation table or paragraph to avoid repeated re-definition across sections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the recommendation of minor revision. The referee's summary correctly identifies the core elements of MT-BKD, including the teacher-informed mixture prior and entropy-based weighting, as well as the empirical validation on synthetic and real-world tasks.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper presents MT-BKD as a Bayesian framework incorporating a teacher-informed mixture prior and entropy-based weighting to integrate multiple teacher models. The central claims rest on this construction plus empirical validation on synthetic data and real tasks (protein localization, image classification). No load-bearing step reduces a prediction to a fitted quantity by definition, invokes self-citation as the sole justification for uniqueness or ansatz, or renames a known result. The derivation is self-contained against external benchmarks with independent content from the Bayesian prior and weighting scheme.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available; no specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted from the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5742 in / 1014 out tokens · 21204 ms · 2026-06-29T11:17:03.505180+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Bates, D. M. and D. G. Watts (1988). Nonlinear Regression Analysis and Its Applications . Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Wiley

    1988

  2. [2]

    Bauer, B. and M. Kohler (2019). On deep learning as a remedy for the curse of dimensionality in nonparametric regression. The Annals of Statistics\/ 47\/ (4), 2261--2285

    2019

  3. [3]

    Bernardo, J. M. (1979). Reference posterior distributions for bayesian inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology\/ 41\/ (2), 113--128

    1979

  4. [4]

    Cornebise, K

    Blundell, C., J. Cornebise, K. Kavukcuoglu and D. Wierstra (2015). Weight uncertainty in neural network. In International conference on machine learning , pp.\ 1613--1622. PMLR

    2015

  5. [5]

    Braulke, T. and J. S. Bonifacino (2009). Sorting of lysosomal proteins. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Molecular Cell Research\/ 1793\/ (4), 605--614

    2009

  6. [6]

    Chen, D., J.-P. Mei, H. Zhang, C. Wang, Y. Feng and C. Chen (2022). Knowledge distillation with the reused teacher classifier. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pp.\ 11933--11942

    2022

  7. [7]

    Chen, M.-H., J. G. Ibrahim and Q.-M. Shao (2000). Power prior distributions for generalized linear models. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference\/ 84\/ (1-2), 121--137

    2000

  8. [8]

    Dingwall, C. and R. A. Laskey (1991). Nuclear targeting sequences—a consensus? Trends in biochemical sciences\/ 16 , 478--481

    1991

  9. [9]

    An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale

    Dosovitskiy, A., L. Beyer, A. Kolesnikov, D. Weissenborn, X. Zhai, T. Unterthiner et al. (2020). An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929\/

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    Ma and Y

    Fan, J., C. Ma and Y. Zhong (2020). A selective overview of deep learning. Statistical science: a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics\/ 36\/ (2), 264

    2020

  11. [11]

    Fang, L., Y. Chen, W. Zhong and P. Ma (2024). Bayesian knowledge distillation: A bayesian perspective of distillation with uncertainty quantification. In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning , pp.\ 12935--12956. PMLR

    2024

  12. [12]

    Faraway, J. J. (2016). Extending the Linear Model with R: Generalized Linear, Mixed Effects and Nonparametric Regression Models\/ (Second Edition ed.). Chapman & Hall/CRC Texts in Statistical Science. CRC Press

    2016

  13. [13]

    Suzuki, G

    Fukuda, T., M. Suzuki, G. Kurata, S. Thomas, J. Cui and B. Ramabhadran (2017). Efficient knowledge distillation from an ensemble of teachers. In Interspeech , pp.\ 3697--3701

    2017

  14. [14]

    Gal, Y. and Z. Ghahramani (2016). Dropout as a B ayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning. In international conference on machine learning , pp.\ 1050--1059. PMLR

    2016

  15. [15]

    Garthwaite, P. H., J. B. Kadane and A. O'Hagan (2005). Statistical methods for eliciting probability distributions. Journal of the American statistical Association\/ 100\/ (470), 680--701

    2005

  16. [16]

    Gelman, A., J. B. Carlin, H. S. Stern, D. B. Dunson, A. Vehtari and D. B. Rubin (2013). Bayesian Data Analysis\/ (3rd ed.). Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC

    2013

  17. [17]

    Gelman, A., J. B. Carlin, H. S. Stern and D. B. Rubin (1995). Bayesian Data Analysis . Chapman and Hall/CRC

    1995

  18. [18]

    Genest, C., K. J. McConway and M. J. Schervish (1986). Characterization of externally bayesian pooling operators. The Annals of Statistics\/ , 487--501

    1986

  19. [19]

    Girolami, M. and B. Calderhead (2011). Riemann manifold L angevin and H amiltonian M onte C arlo methods. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology\/ 73\/ (2), 123--214

    2011

  20. [20]

    Bengio and A

    Goodfellow, I., Y. Bengio and A. Courville (2016). Deep Learning . MIT Press

    2016

  21. [21]

    Gou, J., B. Yu, S. J. Maybank and D. Tao (2021). Knowledge distillation: A survey. International Journal of Computer Vision\/ 129\/ (6), 1789--1819

    2021

  22. [22]

    Gui, S., Z. Wang, J. Chen, X. Zhou, C. Zhang and Y. Cao (2023). Mt4mtl-kd: a multi-teacher knowledge distillation framework for triplet recognition. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging\/

    2023

  23. [23]

    Kohler, A

    Gy \"o rfi, L., M. Kohler, A. Krzyzak and H. Walk (2006). A distribution-free theory of nonparametric regression . Springer Science & Business Media

    2006

  24. [24]

    Zhou and X

    He, M., X. Zhou and X. Wang (2024). Glycosylation: mechanisms, biological functions and clinical implications. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy\/ 9\/ (1), 194

    2024

  25. [25]

    Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network

    Hinton, G., O. Vinyals, J. Dean and others (2015). Distilling the knowledge in a neural network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531\/

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  26. [26]

    Horowitz, J. L. and E. Mammen (2007). Rate-optimal estimation for a general class of nonparametric regression models with unknown link functions

    2007

  27. [27]

    Stein, D

    Huang, D., N. Stein, D. B. Rubin and S. Kou (2020). Catalytic prior distributions with application to generalized linear models. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences\/ 117\/ (22), 12004--12010

    2020

  28. [28]

    Hung, M.-C. and W. Link (2011). Protein localization in disease and therapy. Journal of cell science\/ 124\/ (20), 3381--3392

    2011

  29. [29]

    G., M.-H

    Ibrahim, J. G., M.-H. Chen, Y. Gwon and F. Chen (2015). The power prior: theory and applications. Statistics in medicine\/ 34\/ (28), 3724--3749

    2015

  30. [30]

    Kondratyuk, D., L. Yu, X. Gu, J. Lezama, J. Huang, R. Hornung et al. (2023). Videopoet: A large language model for zero-shot video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.14125\/

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    Rathod, K

    Korattikara Balan, A., V. Rathod, K. P. Murphy and M. Welling (2015). Bayesian dark knowledge. Advances in neural information processing systems\/ 28

    2015

  32. [32]

    Latif, E., L. Fang, P. Ma and X. Zhai (2023). Knowledge distillation of LLM for education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.15842\/

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Lin, Z., H. Akin, R. Rao, B. Hie, Z. Zhu, W. Lu et al. (2023). Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model. Science\/ 379\/ (6637), 1123--1130

    2023

  34. [34]

    Zhang and J

    Liu, Y., W. Zhang and J. Wang (2020). Adaptive multi-teacher multi-level knowledge distillation. Neurocomputing\/ 415 , 106--113

    2020

  35. [35]

    Lu, J., T. Wu, B. Zhang, S. Liu, W. Song, J. Qiao et al. (2021). Types of nuclear localization signals and mechanisms of protein import into the nucleus. Cell communication and signaling\/ 19\/ (1), 60

    2021

  36. [36]

    Courtroom Analogy: New Perspective on Uncertainty-Aware Classification

    Malinin, A., B. Mlodozeniec and M. Gales (2019). Ensemble distribution distillation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.00076\/

    work page arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    McLachlan, G. J. and D. Peel (2000). Finite Mixture Models . Wiley-Interscience

    2000

  38. [38]

    Menon, A. K., A. S. Rawat, S. Reddi, S. Kim and S. Kumar (2021). A statistical perspective on distillation. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pp.\ 7632--7642. PMLR

    2021

  39. [39]

    Nezafat, M

    Owji, H., N. Nezafat, M. Negahdaripour, A. Hajiebrahimi and Y. Ghasemi (2018). A comprehensive review of signal peptides: Structure, roles, and applications. European journal of cell biology\/ 97\/ (6), 422--441

    2018

  40. [40]

    Peng, X., Q. Bai, X. Xia, Z. Huang, K. Saenko and B. Wang (2019). Moment matching for multi-source domain adaptation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pp.\ 1406--1415

    2019

  41. [41]

    Phuong, M. and C. Lampert (2019). Towards understanding knowledge distillation. In International conference on machine learning , pp.\ 5142--5151. PMLR

    2019

  42. [42]

    (2023, May)

    Ray, S. (2023, May). Samsung bans chatgpt among employees after sensitive code leak. Forbes\/ . Published May 2, 2023

    2023

  43. [43]

    Robbins, H. E. (1992). An empirical bayes approach to statistics. In Breakthroughs in Statistics: Foundations and basic theory , pp.\ 388--394. Springer

    1992

  44. [44]

    Kerssen, M

    Sch \"a fer, A., D. Kerssen, M. Veenhuis, W.-H. Kunau and W. Schliebs (2004). Functional similarity between the peroxisomal pts2 receptor binding protein pex18p and the n-terminal half of the pts1 receptor pex5p. Molecular and cellular biology\/ 24\/ (20), 8895--8906

    2004

  45. [45]

    Schmidt-Hieber, J. (2020). Nonparametric regression using deep neural networks with relu activation function

    2020

  46. [46]

    Shao, J. (1993). Linear model selection by cross-validation. Journal of the American statistical Association\/ 88\/ (422), 486--494

    1993

  47. [47]

    Shen, Y., L. Xu, Y. Yang, Y. Li and Y. Guo (2022). Self-distillation from the last mini-batch for consistency regularization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pp.\ 11943--11952

    2022

  48. [48]

    Spiegelhalter, D. J., N. G. Best, B. P. Carlin and A. Linde (2014). The deviance information criterion: 12 years on. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology\/ 76\/ (3), 485--493

    2014

  49. [49]

    Thumuluri, V., J. J. Almagro Armenteros, A. R. Johansen, H. Nielsen and O. Winther (2022). Deeploc 2.0: multi-label subcellular localization prediction using protein language models. Nucleic acids research\/ 50\/ (W1), W228--W234

    2022

  50. [50]

    The Llama 3 Herd of Models

    Touvron, H., T. Lavril, G. Izacard, X. Martinet, H. Jegou, E. Grave et al. (2024, July). The llama 3 herd of models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783\/

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    UniProt Consortium, T. (2018). Uniprot: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic acids research\/ 46\/ (5), 2699--2699

    2018

  52. [52]

    Jalaian and B

    Vadera, M., B. Jalaian and B. Marlin (2020). Generalized B ayesian posterior expectation distillation for deep neural networks. In Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence , pp.\ 719--728. PMLR

    2020

  53. [53]

    Vicol, J

    Wang, K.-C., P. Vicol, J. Lucas, L. Gu, R. Grosse and R. Zemel (2018). Adversarial distillation of B ayesian neural network posteriors. In International conference on machine learning , pp.\ 5190--5199. PMLR

    2018

  54. [54]

    Welling, M. and Y. W. Teh (2011). Bayesian learning via stochastic gradient langevin dynamics. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on machine learning (ICML-11) , pp.\ 681--688

    2011

  55. [55]

    Chiu and K.-H

    Wu, M.-C., C.-T. Chiu and K.-H. Wu (2019). Multi-teacher knowledge distillation for compressed video action recognition on deep neural networks. In ICASSP 2019-2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) , pp.\ 2202--2206. IEEE

    2019

  56. [56]

    Yogev, O. and O. Pines (2011). Dual targeting of mitochondrial proteins: mechanism, regulation and function. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Biomembranes\/ 1808\/ (3), 1012--1020

    2011

  57. [57]

    You, S., C. Xu, C. Xu and D. Tao (2017). Learning from multiple teacher networks. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining , pp.\ 1285--1294

    2017

  58. [58]

    Zagoruyko, S. and N. Komodakis (2016). Paying more attention to attention: Improving the performance of convolutional neural networks via attention transfer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.03928\/

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  59. [59]

    Zhang, A., Z. C. Lipton, M. Li and A. J. Smola (2021). Dive into Deep Learning . Cambridge University Press

    2021

  60. [60]

    Chen and C

    Zhang, H., D. Chen and C. Wang (2022). Confidence-aware multi-teacher knowledge distillation. In ICASSP 2022-2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) , pp.\ 4498--4502. IEEE

    2022

  61. [61]

    Zhao, B., Q. Cui, R. Song, Y. Qiu and J. Liang (2022). Decoupled knowledge distillation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pp.\ 11953--11962

    2022

  62. [62]

    Wang and X

    Zhao, S., X. Wang and X. Wei (2024). Mitigating accuracy-robustness trade-off via balanced multi-teacher adversarial distillation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence\/ (01), 1--14

    2024

  63. [63]

    and Lempitsky, V

    Ganin, Y. and Lempitsky, V. (2015). Unsupervised domain adaptation by backpropagation. In International conference on machine learning , pages 1180--1189. PMLR

    2015

  64. [64]

    He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016). Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 770--778

    2016

  65. [65]

    Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2023). Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model. Science , 379(6637):1123--1130

    2023

  66. [66]

    Y., et al

    Netzer, Y., Wang, T., Coates, A., Bissacco, A., Wu, B., Ng, A. Y., et al. (2011). Reading digits in natural images with unsupervised feature learning. In NIPS workshop on deep learning and unsupervised feature learning , volume 2011, page 4. Granada

    2011

  67. [67]

    Peng, X., Bai, Q., Xia, X., Huang, Z., Saenko, K., and Wang, B. (2019). Moment matching for multi-source domain adaptation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages 1406--1415

    2019

  68. [68]

    Shridhar, K., Laumann, F., and Liwicki, M. (2019). A comprehensive guide to B ayesian convolutional neural network with variational inference. arxiv 2019. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.02731

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  69. [69]

    E., Wang, Y., Huang, H., McGarvey, P

    Suzek, B. E., Wang, Y., Huang, H., McGarvey, P. B., Wu, C. H., and Consortium, U. (2015). Uniref clusters: a comprehensive and scalable alternative for improving sequence similarity searches. Bioinformatics , 31(6):926--932

    2015

  70. [70]

    Campbell, J. I. and S. Austin (2002). Effects of response time deadlines on adults' strategy choices for simple addition. Memory & Cognition\/ 30\/ (6), 988--994

    2002

  71. [71]

    Chi, M. T., P. J. Feltovich, and R. Glaser (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive science\/ 5\/ (2), 121--152

    1981

  72. [72]

    Schubert, C. C., T. K. Denmark, B. Crandall, A. Grome, and J. Pappas (2013). Characterizing novice-expert differences in macrocognition: an exploratory study of cognitive work in the emergency department. Annals of emergency medicine\/ 61\/ (1), 96--109

    2013

  73. [73]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION article output.bibitem format.authors "author" output.check author format.key output output.year.check new.block format.title "title" output.check new.block crossref missing format.jour.vol output format.article.crossref output.nonnull format.pages output if new.block note output fin.entry FUNCTION b...