pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.28800 · v1 · pith:OXR3WMGYnew · submitted 2026-05-27 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall

A GPU-based Solver for Polarization Dynamics in Ferroelectric Materials

Ali Hasan , Edoardo Piccolo , Anna Giordano , Natalya Fedorova , Jorge \'I\~niguez-Gonz\'alez , Davi Rodrigues , Giovanni Finocchio This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 10:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords ferroelectric materialsGPU solverpolarization dynamicsGinzburg-Landau formalismhybrid skyrmionBaTiO3phase transitionselectrostatic field
0
0 comments X

The pith

A GPU-accelerated solver computes the full polarization vector field in ferroelectric systems and stabilizes a three-dimensional hybrid skyrmion.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a GPU-based numerical solver named PETASPIN_microelectrics that computes the full polarization vector field of ferroelectric systems using the Ginzburg-Landau formalism. It incorporates an optimized calculation of the full electrostatic field and supports parallel execution of multiple simulations, overcoming limitations of prior CPU-based tools that rely on simplified electrostatics and reduced-dimensional models. The solver is validated on benchmark problems including temperature-driven hysteretic phase transitions in BaTiO3 and ferroelectric domain wall profiles. It also reproduces hysteresis loops and demonstrates stabilization of a three-dimensional hybrid skyrmion in a PbTiO3/SrTiO3 bilayer system, showing quantitative agreement with analytical theory and prior experiments.

Core claim

The solver named PETASPIN_microelectrics performs GPU-accelerated computations of the complete polarization vector field incorporating optimized electrostatic field solving. It reproduces temperature-driven hysteretic phase transitions in BaTiO3, hysteresis loops, and the stabilization of a three-dimensional hybrid skyrmion in a PbTiO3/SrTiO3 bilayer system with quantitative agreement to analytical predictions and experiments.

What carries the argument

PETASPIN_microelectrics, a GPU-accelerated solver implementing the Ginzburg-Landau formalism with full electrostatic field computation to capture finite-size and boundary effects.

If this is right

  • Enables simulation of finite-size and boundary effects that previous solvers miss.
  • Supports modeling of a wider range of domain structures and domain walls.
  • Facilitates stabilization of topological textures such as three-dimensional hybrid skyrmions.
  • Provides an efficient platform for large-scale simulations supporting predictive modeling for ferroelectric device design.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The solver could be applied to investigate polarization dynamics in additional ferroelectric heterostructures beyond the reported BaTiO3 and PbTiO3 cases.
  • Parallel execution of simulations might enable high-throughput exploration of material parameters for device optimization.
  • Extensions to include explicit time-dependent evolution could address switching dynamics in ferroelectric systems.

Load-bearing premise

The Ginzburg-Landau formalism together with the chosen numerical discretization and electrostatic solver accurately captures the physics of the benchmark systems without introducing significant artifacts.

What would settle it

A mismatch between the simulated three-dimensional hybrid skyrmion structure in the PbTiO3/SrTiO3 bilayer or the hysteretic phase transition temperatures in BaTiO3 and corresponding experimental observations would indicate the solver introduces artifacts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.28800 by Ali Hasan, Anna Giordano, Davi Rodrigues, Edoardo Piccolo, Giovanni Finocchio, Jorge \'I\~niguez-Gonz\'alez, Natalya Fedorova.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) scheme of the PbTiO₃ sample considered. (b)-(d) we show the cross section of the yz plane at the interface as a function of the cube size. (e) shows the average polarization magnitude as a function of volume. 4.4. Field based hysteresis loop in 𝐏𝐛𝐓𝐢𝐎𝟑/𝐒𝐫𝐓𝐢𝐎𝟑 Ferroelectric materials can be used as non-volatile switchable components in devices such as memories or field-effect transistors because of their… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Ferroelectric materials can be used for the development of multiple device concepts combining non-volatility, small dimensions, low-power actuation, and electrical tunability. Such development demands efficient and precise design of simulation tools describing the polarization texture. However, most existing ferroelectric solvers are CPU-based and rely on simplified electrostatic treatments and reduced-dimensional representations of the polarization field. These approximations limit their ability to capture finite-size and boundary effects and restrict the range of domain structures and domain walls that can be realistically simulated. Here, we present a fully GPU (graphics processing units)-accelerated and scalable numerical solver, named PETASPIN_microelectrics, for computing the full polarization vector field of ferroelectric systems using the Ginzburg-Landau formalism. Our solver incorporates an optimized and validated calculation of the full electrostatic field and enables the parallel execution of multiple simulations. We systematically validated the solver with several benchmark problems, including phase transitions in BaTiO3 and ferroelectric domain wall profiles. Our simulations reproduce temperature-driven hysteretic phase transitions in BaTiO3. We also reproduce hysteresis loops and demonstrate stabilization of a three-dimensional hybrid skyrmion in a PbTiO3/SrTiO3 bilayer system. Our results show quantitative agreement with predictions from an analytical theory and prior experimental studies. The proposed solver provides an efficient, accurate platform for large-scale simulations of ferroelectric materials including stabilization of topological textures supporting predictive modeling for next-generation of ferroelectric device design.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents PETASPIN_microelectrics, a GPU-accelerated solver for the time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau equations governing the full three-component polarization vector field in ferroelectric materials. The solver includes an optimized electrostatic field calculation and supports parallel execution of multiple simulations. Validation is reported on temperature-driven hysteretic phase transitions in BaTiO3, ferroelectric domain wall profiles, hysteresis loops, and stabilization of a three-dimensional hybrid skyrmion in a PbTiO3/SrTiO3 bilayer, with quantitative agreement claimed against analytical theory and prior experiments.

Significance. If the numerical implementation is shown to be free of significant discretization artifacts, the solver would provide a scalable platform for large-scale 3D simulations of complex polarization textures, including topological defects relevant to ferroelectric device design. The GPU acceleration and multi-simulation parallelism represent practical advances over typical CPU-based codes with simplified electrostatic treatments.

major comments (3)
  1. [Validation benchmarks] Validation section (around the BaTiO3 phase transition and skyrmion results): the abstract and reported benchmarks claim quantitative agreement with analytical theory and experiments, yet no grid spacing, time-step size, spatial convergence tests, or L2-error metrics versus analytical solutions are provided. Without these, it is impossible to determine whether the reported agreement is robust or sensitive to under-resolved depolarization fields or artificial pinning.
  2. [Numerical methods] Electrostatic solver description: the central claim that the full electrostatic field is accurately computed (necessary for finite-size effects and skyrmion stability) lacks specification of the Poisson solver method, boundary-condition implementation (e.g., periodic vs. open), or tolerance used for the depolarization field. This detail is load-bearing for the PbTiO3/SrTiO3 bilayer results.
  3. [Benchmark problems] Domain-wall profile benchmark: while the solver is stated to reproduce domain wall profiles, no comparison table or figure quantifies the deviation from the known analytical tanh profile as a function of grid resolution, leaving open the possibility that apparent agreement is method-dependent.
minor comments (2)
  1. The solver name PETASPIN_microelectrics appears inconsistently capitalized in the abstract versus the main text.
  2. Figure captions for the skyrmion and hysteresis results should explicitly state the simulation cell size, mesh density, and temperature or voltage sweep rates used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive suggestions. The points raised identify areas where additional numerical detail will strengthen the manuscript. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the requested information in a revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Validation benchmarks] Validation section (around the BaTiO3 phase transition and skyrmion results): the abstract and reported benchmarks claim quantitative agreement with analytical theory and experiments, yet no grid spacing, time-step size, spatial convergence tests, or L2-error metrics versus analytical solutions are provided. Without these, it is impossible to determine whether the reported agreement is robust or sensitive to under-resolved depolarization fields or artificial pinning.

    Authors: We agree that explicit discretization parameters and convergence metrics are necessary to substantiate the quantitative claims. In the revised manuscript we will report the grid spacing and time-step values used for all simulations, include spatial convergence tests (showing polarization and transition temperatures versus grid resolution), and add L2-error norms for the BaTiO3 and skyrmion results relative to analytical or reference solutions. These additions will directly address concerns about possible under-resolution of depolarization fields. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical methods] Electrostatic solver description: the central claim that the full electrostatic field is accurately computed (necessary for finite-size effects and skyrmion stability) lacks specification of the Poisson solver method, boundary-condition implementation (e.g., periodic vs. open), or tolerance used for the depolarization field. This detail is load-bearing for the PbTiO3/SrTiO3 bilayer results.

    Authors: The manuscript text does not currently provide these implementation details. In the revision we will add a dedicated subsection describing the Poisson solver (including the numerical method, boundary conditions applied in each direction, and the convergence tolerance), together with a brief validation that the chosen tolerance is sufficient for the reported skyrmion stability results. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Benchmark problems] Domain-wall profile benchmark: while the solver is stated to reproduce domain wall profiles, no comparison table or figure quantifies the deviation from the known analytical tanh profile as a function of grid resolution, leaving open the possibility that apparent agreement is method-dependent.

    Authors: We will include a new figure (or table) in the revised manuscript that plots the L2 deviation of the simulated domain-wall profile from the analytical tanh solution versus grid spacing, thereby demonstrating convergence and quantifying the discretization error. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: validations rely on external analytical theory and experiments

full rationale

The paper presents a numerical GPU solver for time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau polarization dynamics with full electrostatics. Its central claims are reproductions of known BaTiO3 hysteretic transitions and PbTiO3/SrTiO3 hybrid skyrmion stability, reported as quantitative agreement with independent analytical predictions and prior experimental studies. No equations or steps reduce a reported result to a fitted parameter or self-citation defined inside the paper; the derivation chain consists of standard discretization plus external benchmark comparisons and is therefore self-contained against outside references.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The solver rests on the standard time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau model whose material coefficients are taken from prior literature; no new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • Ginzburg-Landau expansion coefficients for BaTiO3 and PbTiO3
    These coefficients are material-specific and typically determined by fitting to experimental data or taken from earlier publications.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau equation governs ferroelectric polarization dynamics
    Invoked throughout the abstract as the foundation of the numerical solver.
  • domain assumption A finite-difference or finite-element discretization on GPU can faithfully solve the coupled polarization and electrostatic equations
    Required for the claim that the solver produces quantitatively accurate results.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5816 in / 1487 out tokens · 63868 ms · 2026-06-29T10:43:28.253386+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references

  1. [1]

    J. Ren, L. Liu, F. Sun, Q. He, M. Wu, W. Chen, and Y. Zheng, Emergence and transformation of polar skyrmion lattices via flexoelectricity, npj Comput. Mater. 10, 1 (2024)

    2024

  2. [2]

    I. A. Lukyanchuk, A. G. Razumnaya, S. Kondovych, Y. A. Tikhonov, B. Khesin, and V. M. Vinokur, Topological foundations of ferroelectricity, Phys. Rep. 1110, 1 (2025)

    2025

  3. [3]

    Das et al., Local negative permittivity and topological phase transition in polar skyrmions, Nat

    S. Das et al., Local negative permittivity and topological phase transition in polar skyrmions, Nat. Mater. 20, 194 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    Li et al., Unusual topological polar texture in moiré ferroelectrics, Nat

    Y. Li et al., Unusual topological polar texture in moiré ferroelectrics, Nat. Commun. 16, 5451 (2025)

    2025

  5. [5]

    Sánchez-Santolino et al., A 2D ferroelectric vortex pattern in twisted BaTiO3 freestanding layers, Nature 626, 529 (2024)

    G. Sánchez-Santolino et al., A 2D ferroelectric vortex pattern in twisted BaTiO3 freestanding layers, Nature 626, 529 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    Pan et al., Observation and manipulation of two-dimensional topological polar texture confined in moiré interface, Nat

    E. Pan et al., Observation and manipulation of two-dimensional topological polar texture confined in moiré interface, Nat. Commun. 16, 3026 (2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    Das et al., Observation of room-temperature polar skyrmions, Nature 568, 368 (2019)

    S. Das et al., Observation of room-temperature polar skyrmions, Nature 568, 368 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    Hwang, S

    H. Hwang, S. Youn, and H. Kim, Recent advances in ferroelectric materials, devices, and in-memory computing applications, Nano Converg. 12, 55 (2025)

    2025

  9. [9]

    Y. Liu, W. Tang, J. Zeng, C. Bai, K. Zhou, X. Zhang, Q. Liu, Z. Huang, G. Wu, and J. Wang, Ferroelectric-based neuromorphic memory devices for bio-inspired computing, Nat. Rev. Electr. Eng. 2, 773 (2025)

    2025

  10. [10]

    E. Yu, G. K. K, U. Saxena, and K. Roy, Ferroelectric capacitors and field-effect transistors as in- memory computing elements for machine learning workloads, Sci. Rep. 14, 9426 (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    Chandra and P

    P. Chandra and P. B. Littlewood, A Landau primer for ferroelectrics, in Topics in Applied Physics, V ol. 105 (Springer, Berlin, 2007), p. 69

    2007

  12. [12]

    J. Ren, L. Liu, F. Sun, Q. He, M. Wu, W. Chen, and Y. Zheng, Stabilization and control of weakly correlated polar skyrmions in ferroelectric thin films, Acta Mater. 276, 120154 (2024)

    2024

  13. [13]

    J. F. Scott and C. A. Paz De Araujo, Ferroelectric memories, Science 246, 1400 (1989)

    1989

  14. [14]

    Boyn et al., Learning through ferroelectric domain dynamics in solid-state synapses, Nat

    S. Boyn et al., Learning through ferroelectric domain dynamics in solid-state synapses, Nat. Commun. 8, 14736 (2017)

    2017

  15. [15]

    B. Chu, X. Zhou, K. Ren, B. Neese, M. Lin, Q. Wang, F. Bauer, and Q. M. Zhang, A dielectric polymer with high electric energy density and fast discharge speed, Science 313, 334 (2006)

    2006

  16. [16]

    Meier and S

    D. Meier and S. M. Selbach, Ferroelectric domain walls for nanotechnology, Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 157 (2021)

    2021

  17. [17]

    W. Ding, J. Lu, X. Tang, L. Kou, and L. Liu, Ferroelectric materials and their applications in activation of small molecules, ACS Omega 8, 6164 (2023)

    2023

  18. [18]

    C. Guo, H. Yang, S. Dong, S. Tang, J. Wang, X. Wang, and H. Huang, Advancing energy-storage performance in freestanding ferroelectric thin films: Insights from phase-field simulations, Adv. Electron. Mater. 10, 2400001 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    Kumar, M

    P. Kumar, M. Hoffmann, A. Nonaka, S. Salahuddin, and Z. Yao, 3D ferroelectric phase field simulations of polycrystalline multi-phase hafnia and zirconia based ultra-thin films, Adv. Electron. Mater. 10, 2400085 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    L. Q. Chen, Phase-field method of phase transitions/domain structures in ferroelectric thin films: A review, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91, 1835 (2008)

    2008

  21. [21]

    Y. Liu, J. Liu, H. Pan, X. Cheng, Z. Hong, B. Xu, L. Q. Chen, C. W. Nan, and Y. H. Lin, Phase-field simulations of tunable polar topologies in lead-free ferroelectric/paraelectric multilayers with Ultrahigh Energy-Storage Performance, Adv. Mater. 34, 2108772 (2022)

    2022

  22. [22]

    Yang and L.-Q

    T. Yang and L.-Q. Chen, Dynamical phase-field model of coupled electronic and structural processes, npj Comput. Mater. 8, 130 (2022)

    2022

  23. [23]

    Alhada–Lahbabi, D

    K. Alhada–Lahbabi, D. Deleruyelle, and B. Gautier, Machine learning surrogate for 3D phase-field modeling of ferroelectric tip-induced electrical switching, npj Comput. Mater. 10, 197 (2024)

    2024

  24. [24]

    Alhada-Lahbabi, D

    K. Alhada-Lahbabi, D. Deleruyelle, and B. Gautier, Transfer learning for accelerating phase-field modeling of ferroelectric domain formation in large-scale 3D systems, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 429, 117167 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    H. L. Hu and L. Q. Chen, Three-dimensional computer simulation of ferroelectric domain formation, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81, 492 (1998)

    1998

  26. [26]

    Indergand, D

    R. Indergand, D. M. Kochmann, and M. I. Idiart, Phase-field simulations of ferro-electro-elasticity in model polycrystals with implications for phenomenological descriptions of bulk perovskite ceramics, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 192, 105831 (2024)

    2024

  27. [27]

    Alhada–Lahbabi, D

    K. Alhada–Lahbabi, D. Deleruyelle, and B. Gautier, Ultrafast and accurate prediction of polycrystalline hafnium oxide phase-field ferroelectric hysteresis using graph neural networks, Nanoscale Adv. 6, 2350 (2024)

    2024

  28. [28]

    L. Fan, M. Reder, D. Schneider, M. Hinterstein, and B. Nestler, A phase-field model for ferroelectric materials—based on the multiphase-field method, Comput. Mater. Sci. 230, 112510 (2023)

    2023

  29. [29]

    Kumar, A

    P. Kumar, A. Nonaka, R. Jambunathan, G. Pahwa, S. Salahuddin, and Z. Yao, FerroX: A GPU- accelerated, 3D phase-field simulation framework for modeling ferroelectric devices, Comput. Phys. Commun. 290, 108757 (2023)

    2023

  30. [30]

    Bell and J

    N. Bell and J. Hoberock, Thrust: A productivity-oriented library for CUDA, in GPU Computing Gems Jade Edition, edited by W. M. Hwu (Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, MA, 2012), pp. 359–37

    2012

  31. [31]

    NVIDIA, Thrust, https://developer.nvidia.com/thrust (Marrch 24, 2026)

    2026

  32. [32]

    J. J. Wang, B. Wang, and L. Q. Chen, Understanding, predicting, and designing ferroelectric domain structures and switching guided by the phase-field method, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 49, 127 (2019)

    2019

  33. [33]

    Wang, Y.-J

    J.-J. Wang, Y.-J. Su, B. Wang, J. Ouyang, Y.-H. Ren, and L.-Q. Chen, Strain engineering of dischargeable energy density of ferroelectric thin-film capacitors, Nano Energy 72, 104665 (2020)

    2020

  34. [34]

    J. Liu, H. Wen, W. Chen, and Y. Zheng, Atomistic studies of temporal characteristics of polarization relaxation in ferroelectrics, Phys. Rev. B 103, 014308 (2021)

    2021

  35. [35]

    Marton, I

    P. Marton, I. Rychetsky, and J. Hlinka, Domain walls of ferroelectric BaTiO3 within the Ginzburg- Landau-Devonshire phenomenological model, Phys. Rev. B 81, 144125 (2010)

    2010

  36. [36]

    W. J. Chen, Y. Zheng, and B. Wang, Vortex domain structure in ferroelectric nanoplatelets and control of its transformation by mechanical load, Sci. Rep. 2, 796 (2012)

    2012

  37. [37]

    Y. L. Wang, A. K. Tagantsev, D. Damjanovic, N. Setter, V. K. Yarmarkin, A. I. Sokolov, and I. A. Lukyanchuk, Landau thermodynamic potential for BaTiO3, J. Appl. Phys. 101, 104115 (2007)

    2007

  38. [38]

    Y. Su, N. Liu, and G. J. Weng, A phase field study of frequency dependence and grain-size effects in nanocrystalline ferroelectric polycrystals, Acta Mater. 87, 293 (2015)

    2015

  39. [39]

    Lv and C

    P. Lv and C. S. Lynch, Phase-field simulation of domain walls in rhombohedral ferroelectric single crystals, Acta Mater. 155, 245 (2018)

    2018

  40. [40]

    Lopez-Diaz, D

    L. Lopez-Diaz, D. Aurelio, L. Torres, E. Martinez, M. A. Hernandez-Lopez, J. Gomez, O. Alejos, M. Carpentieri, G. Finocchio, and G. Consolo, Micromagnetic simulations using graphics processing units, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 45, 323001 (2012)

    2012

  41. [41]

    Hu and L.-Q

    H.-L. Hu and L.-Q. Chen, Computer simulation of 90° ferroelectric domain formation in two dimensions, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 238, 182 (1997)

    1997

  42. [42]

    J. Wang, Y. Li, L. Q. Chen, and T. Y. Zhang, The effect of mechanical strains on the ferroelectric and dielectric properties of a model single crystal — Phase field simulation, Acta Mater. 53, 2495 (2005)

    2005

  43. [43]

    A. K. Soh, Y. C. Song, and Y. Ni, Phase field simulations of hysteresis and butterfly loops in ferroelectrics subjected to electro-mechanical coupled loading, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 89, 652 (2006)

    2006

  44. [44]

    Koyama and H

    T. Koyama and H. Onodera, Phase-field simulation of ferroelectric domain microstructure changes in BaTiO3, Mater. Trans. 50, 970 (2009)

    2009

  45. [45]

    Wang, S.-Q

    J. Wang, S.-Q. Shi, L.-Q. Chen, Y. Li, and T.-Y. Zhang, Phase-field simulations of ferroelectric/ferroelastic polarization switching, Acta Mater. 52, 749 (2004)

    2004

  46. [46]

    A. J. Bell and L. E. Cross, A phenomenological Gibbs function for BaTiO3 giving correct E field dependence of all ferroelectric phase changes, Ferroelectrics 59, 197 (1984)

    1984

  47. [47]

    C. Guo, G. Dong, Z. Zhou, M. Liu, H. Huang, J. Hong, and X. Wang, Domain evolution in bended freestanding BaTiO3 ultrathin films: A phase-field simulation, Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 152903 (2020)

    2020

  48. [48]

    Y. L. Li, S. Y. Hu, Z. K. Liu, and L. Q. Chen, Effect of substrate constraint on the stability and evolution of ferroelectric domain structures in thin films, Acta Mater. 50, 395 (2002)

    2002

  49. [49]

    Van Lich, B

    L. Van Lich, B. H. Vu, D. T. H. Hue, D. T. H. Giang, T. Shimada, V. H. Dinh, and M. H. Phan, Low- field energy storage enhancement in ferroelectric/paraelectric PbTiO3/SrTiO3 nanocomposites near antiferroelectric–ferroelectric transition region, J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Devices 9, 100687 (2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    Durdiev, F

    D. Durdiev, F. Wendler, M. Zaiser, H. Azuma, T. Tsuzuki, S. Ogata, T. Ogawa, R. Kobayashi, and M. Uranagase, Parameterization of a phase field model for ferroelectrics from molecular dynamics data, Acta Mater. 283, 120513 (2025)

    2025

  51. [51]

    Chang, H

    P. Chang, H. Zhang, M. Xie, H. Zhang, and Y. Xie, Phase transitions and switching dynamics of topological domains in hafnium oxide-based cylindrical ferroelectrics from three-dimensional phase field simulation, Nanomaterials 15, 1901 (2025)

    1901

  52. [52]

    Romeo, G

    A. Romeo, G. Finocchio, M. Carpentieri, L. Torres, G. Consolo, and B. Azzerboni, A numerical solution of the magnetization reversal modeling in a permalloy thin film using fifth order Runge– Kutta method with adaptive step size control, Physica B 403, 464 (2008)

    2008

  53. [53]

    Giordano, G

    A. Giordano, G. Finocchio, L. Torres, M. Carpentieri, and B. Azzerboni, Semi-implicit integration scheme for Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert-Slonczewski equation, J. Appl. Phys. 111, 07D112 (2012)

    2012

  54. [54]

    Cao and L

    W. Cao and L. E. Cross, Theory of tetragonal twin structures in ferroelectric perovskites with a first- order phase transition, Phys. Rev. B 44, 5 (1991)

    1991

  55. [55]

    Flaschel and L

    M. Flaschel and L. De Lorenzis, Calibration of material parameters based on 180° and 90° ferroelectric domain wall properties in Ginzburg–Landau–Devonshire phase field models, Arch. Appl. Mech. 90, 2755 (2020)

    2020

  56. [56]

    Gigli, M

    L. Gigli, M. Veit, M. Kotiuga, G. Pizzi, N. Marzari, and M. Ceriotti, Thermodynamics and dielectric response of BaTiO3 by data-driven modeling, npj Comput. Mater. 8, 209 (2022)

    2022

  57. [57]

    M. C. Mendoza-Ramirez, R. A. Shohan, J. Cantú-Valle, M. Moreno, and A. Ponce, In situ ferroelectric polarization of BaTiO3 at low temperatures measured by electron holography, Microsc. Microanal. 30, 1690–1692 (2024)

    2024

  58. [58]

    Zhang, H

    J. Zhang, H. Zhang, H. Zheng, B. Xu, J. Wang, and X. Guo, On-the-fly machine learning-assisted high accuracy second-principles model for BaTiO3, npj Comput. Mater. 11, 299 (2025)

    2025

  59. [59]

    Azuma, T

    H. Azuma, T. Ogawa, S. Ogata, R. Kobayashi, M. Uranagase, T. Tsuzuki, and F. Wendler, Unique temperature-dependence of polarization switching paths in ferroelectric BaTiO3: A molecular dynamics simulation study, Acta Mater. 296, 121216 (2025)

    2025

  60. [60]

    E. K. Akdogan, C. J. Rawn, W. D. Porter, E. A. Payzant, and A. Safari, Size effects in PbTiO3 nanocrystals: Effect of particle size on spontaneous polarization and strains, J. Appl. Phys. 97, 084305 (2005)

    2005

  61. [61]

    W. Y. Shih, W. H. Shih, and I. A. Aksay, Size dependence of the ferroelectric transition of small BaTiO3 particles: Effect of depolarization, Phys. Rev. B 50, 15575 (1994)

    1994

  62. [62]

    Hoshina, Size effect of barium titanate: Fine particles and ceramics, J

    T. Hoshina, Size effect of barium titanate: Fine particles and ceramics, J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn 121, 156 (2013)

    2013

  63. [63]

    Muench, A

    I. Muench, A. Renuka Balakrishna, and J. E. Huber, Periodic boundary conditions for the simulation of 3D domain patterns in tetragonal ferroelectric material, Arch. Appl. Mech. 89, 955 (2019)

    2019

  64. [64]

    Dayal and K

    K. Dayal and K. Bhattacharya, A real-space non-local phase-field model of ferroelectric domain patterns in complex geometries, Acta Mater. 55, 1907 (2007)

    1907

  65. [65]

    Luk’yanchuk, Y

    I. Luk’yanchuk, Y. Tikhonov, A. Razumnaya, and V. M. Vinokur, Hopfions emerge in ferroelectrics, Nat. Commun. 11, 2433 (2020)

    2020

  66. [66]

    K. C. Pitike, J. Mangeri, H. Whitelock, T. Patel, P. Dyer, S. P. Alpay, and S. Nakhmanson, Metastable vortex-like polarization textures in ferroelectric nanoparticles of different shapes and sizes, J. Appl. Phys. 124, 064101 (2018)

    2018

  67. [67]

    D. Zhu, J. Mangeri, R. Wang, and S. Nakhmanson, Size, shape, and orientation dependence of the field-induced behavior in ferroelectric nanoparticles, J. Appl. Phys. 125, 134102 (2019)

    2019

  68. [68]

    S. M. Yang, J. Y. Jo, T. H. Kim, J.-G. Yoon, T. K. Song, H. N. Lee, Z. Marton, S. Park, Y. Jo, and T. W. Noh, ac dynamics of ferroelectric domains from an investigation of the frequency dependence of hysteresis loops, Phys. Rev. B 82, 174125 (2010)

    2010

  69. [69]

    Y. J. Shin, B. C. Jeon, S. M. Yang, I. Hwang, M. R. Cho, D. Sando, S. R. Lee, J.-G. Yoon, and T. W. Noh, Suppression of creep-regime dynamics in epitaxial ferroelectric BiFeO3 films, Sci. Rep. 5, 10485 (2015)

    2015

  70. [70]

    M. A. P. Gonçalves, C. Escorihuela-Sayalero, P. Garcia-Fernández, J. Junquera, and J. Íñiguez, Theoretical guidelines to create and tune electric skyrmion bubbles, Sci. Adv. 5, eaau7023 (2019)

    2019

  71. [71]

    Xue et al., Observation of switchable polar skyrmion bubbles down to the atomic layers in van der Waals ferroelectric CuInP2S6, Nat

    F. Xue et al., Observation of switchable polar skyrmion bubbles down to the atomic layers in van der Waals ferroelectric CuInP2S6, Nat. Commun. 16, 2349 (2025)

    2025

  72. [72]

    Finocchio, F

    G. Finocchio, F. Büttner, R. Tomasello, M. Carpentieri, and M. Kläui, Magnetic skyrmions: from fundamental to applications, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 49, 423001 (2016)

    2016

  73. [73]

    Zhang, Q

    Y. Zhang, Q. Li, H. Huang, J. Hong, and X. Wang, Strain manipulation of ferroelectric skyrmion bubbles in a freestanding PbTiO3 film: A phase field simulation, Phys. Rev. B 105, 224101 (2022)

    2022

  74. [74]

    D. C. Ma, Y. Zheng, and C. H. Woo, Phase-field simulation of domain structure for PbTiO3/SrTiO3 superlattices, Acta Mater. 57, 4736 (2009)

    2009

  75. [75]

    N. A. Pertsev, A. G. Zembilgotov, and A. K. Tagantsev, Effect of mechanical boundary conditions on phase diagrams of epitaxial ferroelectric thin films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1988 (1998)

    1988

  76. [76]

    Grelier, F

    M. Grelier, F. Godel, A. Vecchiola, S. Collin, K. Bouzehouane, A. Fert, V. Cros, and N. Reyren, Three-dimensional skyrmionic cocoons in magnetic multilayers, Nat. Commun. 13, 6843 (2022)

    2022

  77. [77]

    Mandru, O

    A.-O. Mandru, O. Yıldırım, R. Tomasello, P. Heistracher, M. Penedo, A. Giordano, D. Suess, G. Finocchio, and H. J. Hug, Coexistence of distinct skyrmion phases observed in hybrid ferromagnetic/ferrimagnetic multilayers, Nat. Commun. 11, 6365 (2020)

    2020

  78. [78]

    Tomasello, Z

    R. Tomasello, Z. Wang, E. Raimondo, S. Je, M. Im, M. Carpentieri, W. Jiang, and G. Finocchio, Field-driven collapsing dynamics of skyrmions in magnetic multilayers, Phys. Rev. B 107, 184416 (2023)

    2023

  79. [79]

    A. P. Bartók and G. Csányi, Gaussian approximation potentials: A brief tutorial introduction, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 115, 1051 (2015)

    2015

  80. [80]

    H. Wang, L. Zhang, J. Han, and W. E, DeePMD-kit: A deep learning package for many-body potential energy representation and molecular dynamics, Comput. Phys. Commun. 228, 178 (2018)

    2018

Showing first 80 references.